Social Media

Austria's far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ) has ushered in what its leader, Herbert Kickl, described as a "new era" following a landmark electoral win. The FPÖ secured 29.2% of the vote, surpassing the conservative People's Party (ÖVP), which garnered 26.5%, according to provisional results. Despite this triumph, the FPÖ remains well short of an outright majority, leaving the formation of a governing coalition uncertain. Kickl's victory marks another chapter in the rising tide of far-right successes across Europe. In his victory speech, Kickl praised the electorate for their "optimism, courage and trust," stating that they had contributed to a "piece of history." However, forming a government remains complicated. While the FPÖ has previously governed in coalition, the ÖVP, led by Chancellor Karl Nehammer, has refused to cooperate with Kickl. Nehammer has openly stated that it is “impossible to form a government with someone who adores conspiracy theories.” A high voter turnout of 74.9% reflected the intense public interest in an election shaped by concerns over migration, asylum, a struggling economy, and the ongoing war in Ukraine. As results rolled in and parts of Austria turned dark blue, representing FPÖ's victory, party general secretary Michael Schnedlitz declared, "The men and women of Austria have made history today." He remained cautious, however, not disclosing the party’s strategy for forming a coalition. The demographic breakdown of voters showed that those between 35 and 59 years of age were most inclined to support the far-right, with a slight tilt toward women. The FPÖ has claimed 58 seats in Austria's 183-seat parliament, while the ÖVP secured 52 seats, and the Social Democrats won 41. Kickl, a fiery figure in Austrian politics, campaigned on promises to build "Fortress Austria," restoring what he described as the nation's lost security, prosperity, and peace. His vision aligns closely with that of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, raising concerns about Austria's potential political trajectory. Andreas Babler, the leader of the Social Democrats, warned that Austria must avoid following the path of Hungary, where Orban's nationalist policies have raised alarms in Europe. Kickl has also expressed aspirations to become Austria’s "Volkskanzler" (people's chancellor), a term that some Austrians associate with Adolf Hitler from Nazi Germany. Founded by former Nazis in the 1950s, the FPÖ has a controversial history. Just days before the election, several of the party's candidates were filmed singing an SS song at a funeral, a reminder of the party’s historical roots. The electoral victory also prompted small protests outside Austria’s parliament, where demonstrators carried anti-Nazi banners. Forming a coalition government is expected to be a challenge for Kickl. While the Social Democrats, Greens, and Neos have ruled out any alliance with the far-right, the FPÖ's only viable coalition partner could be the conservatives. However, ÖVP’s leadership has made it clear that they do not support Kickl’s bid for chancellor. Political analyst Thomas Hofer suggested that it remains unclear whether Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen would even grant Kickl a mandate to form a government. There are rumors that Nehammer might face pressure from within his own party to drop his opposition to Kickl, especially after such a significant electoral defeat. A senior figure in the FPÖ even suggested that Nehammer should resign, though that notion was rejected by the general secretary of the ÖVP. President Van der Bellen has previously expressed reservations about the FPÖ due to its critical stance on the EU and its refusal to denounce Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Many FPÖ MPs walked out of a speech by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Vienna last year, and the party opposes EU sanctions against Moscow, citing Austria's neutrality. Kickl’s victory is the latest in a series of successes for far-right parties across Europe. In Italy, Giorgia Meloni now leads a right-wing coalition, while Germany’s AfD recently topped polls in Thuringia, and France’s National Rally won the European elections last June. However, unlike Kickl, Meloni has backed the EU's defense of Ukraine. The European far-right movement continues to gain momentum, with AfD co-leader Alice Weidel congratulating Kickl, and Marine Le Pen of France’s National Rally hailing the results as a sign of the "people's triumphs everywhere." Geert Wilders, who leads the far-right Freedom Party in the Netherlands, echoed these sentiments, stating that "identity, sovereignty, freedom and no more illegal immigration/asylum" are now key issues for millions of Europeans. For Kickl, Sunday's win represents a comeback from 2019, when the FPÖ fell to third place following a video sting scandal involving its former leader. As he now seeks to lead Austria, the political landscape remains fractured, with coalition negotiations likely to dominate the coming weeks. Based on a report from: BBC 2024-10-01

Newly obtained documents from The Insider confirm that Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny was poisoned during his imprisonment at the Polar Wolf penal colony in Russia's Far North, contradicting the official explanation of his death. On February 16, 2024, Navalny, who had long been a vocal critic of the Russian government, died under mysterious circumstances, with authorities attributing his death to natural causes. However, the documents reveal a disturbing cover-up, with key medical symptoms being systematically removed from official records. These symptoms, medical experts now confirm, strongly indicate poisoning. According to early documents signed by Russian investigator Alexander Varapaev, Navalny experienced a sudden and severe decline in his health while in an exercise yard. "On 16.02.2024, convict A.A. Navalny felt a sharp deterioration of his health condition while in exercise yard No. 2... He began to complain of sharp pain in the abdominal area; he started reflexive ejection of his stomach contents, had convulsions, and lost consciousness, which was immediately reported to the medical staff of the correctional facility." These symptoms, including abdominal pain, vomiting, and convulsions, are consistent with poisoning. However, in the final version of the official report, all mention of these critical symptoms had been removed. Further evidence of a poisoning attempt is found in an inventory of "seized objects" taken from the scene of Navalny's death, which included "samples of vomit." Despite being submitted for examination, neither the existence of the samples nor the examination's findings were ever officially reported. These omissions lend credibility to the suspicions raised by Navalny’s wife, Yulia, who had previously stated that her husband had complained of intense stomach pain just before his death. Medical experts agree that the official explanation given by the Russian Investigative Committee — that Navalny died of natural causes, specifically a heart rhythm disorder — does not align with the documented symptoms. ER doctor Alexander Polupan, who treated Navalny following his 2020 Novichok poisoning, noted that "the official cause of death — a heart rhythm disorder — would in no way explain the symptoms described: sharp abdominal pain, vomiting, or seizures. These symptoms can hardly be explained by anything other than poisoning." Polupan suggested that the symptoms were indicative of exposure to an organophosphorus agent, the same class of chemicals as Novichok, but possibly administered internally in this case. Navalny had previously survived a poisoning attempt in August 2020, when Russian FSB agents used a Novichok nerve agent on him during a flight from Tomsk to Moscow. That poisoning nearly claimed his life, but quick intervention by medical staff in Omsk saved him. Even then, Russian authorities tried to dismiss the incident, attributing his collapse to "low blood sugar" rather than the poisoning. In the wake of Navalny's death in 2024, Russian authorities delayed the release of his body for several days and refused to allow independent examination of biological samples. This reluctance to permit transparent investigation fueled immediate suspicions of foul play. Now, with the release of these documents, it is clear that Navalny was indeed poisoned, and that Russian officials actively worked to suppress the truth. The case of Navalny’s poisoning in prison is not just a tragic end for one of the most prominent critics of the Russian government, but also a stark reminder of the lengths to which the state will go to silence opposition. Despite the official narrative, evidence points overwhelmingly to deliberate poisoning, making Navalny a victim of the very regime he spent his life opposing. Based on a report from: The Insider 2024-10-01

Update: Nasrallah's Body Recovered After Israeli Strike, Hezbollah Suffers Major Losses The body of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah was retrieved from the rubble of an Israeli airstrike in Beirut’s southern suburbs, according to medical and security sources. The airstrike, which targeted Hezbollah’s underground headquarters in the Dahiyeh district, also killed more than 20 Hezbollah operatives, including some of Nasrallah’s closest allies and key military figures. Hezbollah confirmed Nasrallah’s death on Saturday, though the exact cause of death remained unclear. Sources indicated that his body showed no direct wounds, suggesting that blunt trauma from the explosion’s force may have been the cause. A short video, circulated by Lebanese media, purportedly shows the recovery of Nasrallah’s body from the underground bunker where the attack occurred. Ali Karaki, who managed Hezbollah’s military activities in southern Lebanon, had previously survived an Israeli assassination attempt earlier in the week. Hezbollah confirmed his death on Sunday. In addition to Hezbollah members, Abbas Nilforoushan, the deputy commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Quds Force, was also killed in the strike. The attack occurred as Hezbollah leaders and IRGC officials gathered in the group's primary underground command center in Beirut. According to the IDF, the headquarters were located beneath residential buildings, dangerously close to a United Nations-run school. The Israeli Air Force deployed F-15I fighter jets, which dropped dozens of bunker-busting bombs on the site, dealing a significant blow to Hezbollah’s command structure.

Former President Donald Trump has issued a stern warning to Google, threatening legal prosecution if he is re-elected in November. Trump alleges that the tech giant manipulates its search results to display negative stories about him while favoring Vice President Kamala Harris with positive coverage. This accusation follows a recent report from the conservative watchdog group, Media Research Center (MRC), which claims Google unfairly promotes left-leaning news outlets over political candidates’ websites. Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to express his outrage. “It has been determined that Google has illegally used a system of only revealing and displaying bad stories about Donald J. Trump, some made up for this purpose while, at the same time, only revealing good stories about Comrade Kamala Harris,” Trump wrote. He called the alleged practice an "ILLEGAL ACTIVITY" and urged the Department of Justice to investigate. “Hopefully the Justice Department will criminally prosecute them for this blatant Interference of Elections,” Trump continued. “If not, and subject to the Laws of our Country, I will request their prosecution, at the maximum levels, when I win the Election, and become President of the United States!” While Trump did not provide details about what specifically triggered his post, it is likely in response to the report by the Media Research Center. The report claims that Google skews its search results to favor legacy media outlets, such as *The New York Times*, *The Washington Post*, and CNN, over political candidates’ websites, including those of Trump and Harris. The Media Research Center cited instances in which articles from these outlets appeared above the campaign websites of both candidates, implying that the search engine’s algorithm gives priority to left-leaning media. The report is part of a broader concern among conservatives that Big Tech platforms harbor bias against right-wing figures and viewpoints. In response to the claims, Google issued a statement refuting the allegations, and referenced their consistent ranking practices. “Both campaign websites consistently appear at the top of Search for relevant and common search queries,” a Google spokesperson told *The Hill*. The company dismissed the MRC report, emphasizing that it focused on "a single rare search term on a single day a few weeks ago," and stated that even in that instance, both candidates’ websites were among the top results. Google has long been under scrutiny from conservative circles, with accusations that its search algorithms favor liberal viewpoints and publications. Trump’s latest threats amplify the ongoing debate about tech companies’ role in shaping political discourse and their alleged influence on election outcomes. The former president has had an antagonistic relationship with tech giants, particularly during and after his presidency. Trump has accused platforms such as Google, Twitter, and Facebook of censoring conservative voices, allegations which these companies have repeatedly denied. His criticism reached a boiling point when several social media platforms, including Twitter and Facebook, banned him following the January 6 Capitol riots, citing violations of their terms of service. Trump’s vow to prosecute Google if re-elected adds another layer to his broader campaign strategy, positioning himself as a crusader against Big Tech’s alleged overreach. His remarks suggest that tech companies could face greater scrutiny and potential legal action under a second Trump administration, especially if he perceives their actions as undermining his candidacy or promoting his political opponents. As the 2024 presidential race heats up, it is clear that the relationship between Trump and Big Tech will remain contentious, with the former president determined to hold these companies accountable for what he views as biased behavior. Whether these claims lead to any significant legal action or policy changes remains to be seen. For now, the public debate over Big Tech’s role in politics continues to intensify. Based on a report from: The Hill 2024-09-30

Phillip Schofield, the former ITV presenter, has spoken candidly about his feelings of betrayal after details of his affair with a younger colleague surfaced, claiming that those around him had "thrown him under the bus." Schofield, 62, who left ITV last year after admitting to lying about a consensual relationship with a younger man who worked as a runner on *This Morning*, expressed his frustration and disbelief at how he was treated by the network and those he once trusted. "I could drive the same bus over so many people," Schofield said, alluding to the betrayals he experienced from people close to him. According to him, other TV personalities had engaged in similar conduct, but it was he who was singled out. In a recent interview during his comeback series *Cast Away*, Schofield shared his reflections on his career, his love for working at the famed Television Centre in London, and how the scandal affected him personally. "It was my greatest dream to walk into Television Centre," he reminisced. "At the age of 19, I became a bookings clerk at the BBC and I got a pass that got me into all of the BBC buildings. It was so magical to walk through those gates." Schofield went on to describe how his career at the iconic studio was a cherished experience, until the scandal turned everything upside down. "I loved being there. Which meant that when what happened to me happened to me, it screwed up my favourite building in the world. It pretty well blew away all those happy memories. Suddenly the place became hostile to me. And that was heartbreaking." His departure from ITV in May came after he publicly apologized for deceiving the media, his colleagues, and his friends about the nature of his relationship with the young man. Schofield clarified that while he had helped the teenager secure work experience with the channel when he was 19, there had been no sexual contact between them until the man was around 20 years old. Reflecting on the fallout from the scandal, Schofield revealed his feelings of betrayal by those who turned their backs on him during his lowest moments. "The people who did it to me know how important that building was to me. They know that when you throw someone under a bus, you’ve got to have a really bloody good reason to do it. Brand ambition is not good enough." His pain was evident as he spoke about the difficulty of accepting that those he trusted had "completely different agendas." "It has been hard to come to terms with the fact that the people you thought you knew were not the people that you thought you knew," Schofield admitted. "Man alive, people can be fake. They can be so fake when it’s all going well, and then sudden utter betrayal." He added, "How many friends do you need? I don’t need 200 fake friends." Schofield’s remarks come in the wake of speculation that he might join the cast of *I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here* for its upcoming season, though he seemed to dismiss the idea during an interview from his home in London before heading off to the *Cast Away* island. "I’m apparently four to one [odds] to do the other jungle programme," he said, referring to the ITV show hosted by his friends Ant McPartlin and Dec Donnelly. "Now, although my best mates host it, there are some channels you just won’t work for. There are just some people you won’t work for." *Cast Away*, which features Schofield trying to survive on an island in the Indian Ocean for ten days, airs over three nights starting September 30. Based on a report from: The Independent 2024-09-30

Kemi Badenoch, a Conservative leadership hopeful, has sparked debate by claiming that not all cultures are "equally valid" in the context of immigration. Badenoch, known for her forthright views, emphasized that it is "naive" to believe immigrants will automatically abandon long-standing cultural hostilities when they arrive in Britain. According to her, most politicians avoid discussing immigration in terms of culture, choosing instead to focus on its economic aspects because they fear the subject is too controversial. In an article for *The Telegraph*, Badenoch made clear that culture encompasses more than just "cuisine or clothes." It also includes "customs which may be at odds with British values." She noted that many immigrants bring deeply ingrained beliefs and tensions with them, and it is naive to think those feelings will vanish upon crossing a border. “We cannot be naïve and assume immigrants will automatically abandon ancestral ethnic hostilities at the border, or that all cultures are equally valid. They are not. I am struck, for example, by the number of recent immigrants to the UK who hate Israel. That sentiment has no place here,” she said. Badenoch, who was born in London to Nigerian parents and spent much of her childhood in Lagos before returning to the UK at 16, emphasized the complexity of immigration in modern times. She highlighted how technology and social media have transformed the immigrant experience, explaining that today's migrants remain closely connected to their countries of origin. “We must recognise that the world has changed. When I moved back to this country 30 years ago, it was impossible to communicate quickly with my family. Letters would take weeks to arrive, I had to schedule calls with the few people who had working telephones let alone mobiles. Today’s immigrants, even those arriving on boats, come with WhatsApp and Instagram. Their feet may be in the UK, but their heads and hearts are still back in their country of origin,” Badenoch said. She stressed the need for not just an immigration strategy but also an integration strategy that reflects these changes. “We need an integration strategy that takes this into account,” she urged, calling for a more nuanced approach to addressing cultural differences among immigrant populations. Badenoch argued that Britain’s tolerance must not be exploited by those who come to the country but then undermine the values that have allowed it to succeed. “We must never allow our tolerance to be taken advantage of by those who arrive, only to undermine the very values that have allowed us to succeed,” she concluded. Badenoch’s remarks come at a critical time in the Conservative Party's leadership race, where she, along with candidates such as Robert Jenrick, James Cleverly, and Tom Tugendhat, are vying for the top spot. Each contender is expected to present their policies to party members ahead of the next round of MP votes. Badenoch’s focus on immigration and culture will likely stir further debate as the leadership contest unfolds. Based on a report from: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-30

UK lawmaker Rosie Duffield resigned from the Labour Party on Saturday, citing "staggering hypocrisy" by Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In her resignation letter, Duffield criticized Starmer for accepting lavish gifts while simultaneously endorsing policies that, in her view, harm vulnerable citizens. Duffield’s departure marks the first resignation in Starmer's government and comes after reports surfaced that the prime minister had received over £100,000 in gifts and hospitality. Among these were luxury items such as designer suits and glasses, gifts she deemed inappropriate for a leader at a time when cuts were being made to essential benefits for pensioners and families. "The sleaze, nepotism, and apparent avarice are off the scale," Duffield wrote, alluding to the stark contrast between Starmer’s personal affluence and his support for cutting benefits. Her criticisms extended to specific policies she labeled as "cruel and unnecessary," particularly the decision to cut an annual £300 winter heating payment to pensioners. She expressed her dismay that a prime minister with significant wealth would maintain the Conservatives' controversial two-child limit on benefits, which she believes perpetuates poverty among children. "Someone with far-above-average wealth choosing to keep the Conservatives’ two-child limit to benefit payments which entrenches children in poverty, while inexplicably accepting expensive personal gifts of designer suits and glasses costing more than most of those people can grasp – this is entirely undeserving of holding the title of Labour Prime Minister,” Duffield wrote in her letter. In announcing her departure, Duffield affirmed that she would continue her work as an independent MP, guided by what she described as her "core Labour values," implying that she no longer sees these values reflected in Starmer’s leadership. The resignation has sparked conversations about the direction of the Labour Party under Starmer’s leadership, with Duffield’s criticisms pointing to a growing discontent among certain factions of the party. Her move as an independent MP suggests a potential shift in the party’s internal dynamics, with greater scrutiny likely to follow regarding Starmer’s decisions and policies. Based on a report from: Barrons 2024-09-30

Donald Trump once told Fox News’s Sean Hannity that he wouldn’t be a dictator, “except on Day One.” On that first day back in office, he said, “I want to close the border, and I want to drill, drill, drill.” He quickly clarified his statement, saying, “After that, I’m not a dictator,” but his comment triggered outrage from critics who labeled it authoritarian. Meanwhile, those same critics ignored the aggressive unilateral actions of Joe Biden when he first took office. Biden's early presidency was marked by a flurry of executive orders, such as canceling the Keystone Pipeline, mandating masks on federal property, and rejoining the Paris Climate Accord. He also froze student debt collections, reinforced protections for illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children, and revoked Trump’s 1776 Commission. Moreover, Biden stopped border wall construction, suspended oil drilling leases on federal lands, and banned workplace discrimination against LGBTQ employees. The media lauded Biden’s sweeping changes, celebrating his efforts to reverse Trump’s policies. If Trump were to return to office, restoring order at the border would be his first priority. Illegal immigration remains a pressing concern for many voters, as the U.S. has seen more than 10 million unvetted individuals enter the country. Towns like Aurora, Colorado, have witnessed a rise in crime, partly due to sanctuary city policies in nearby Denver that attract gangs. Meanwhile, in New York City, residents are paying billions to house and care for migrants, many of whom are involved in violent crime. Trump has made it clear that this cannot continue. Eliminating sanctuary city laws is essential to Trump’s plan. These laws protect illegal immigrants from being deported, even when they commit serious crimes. In Trump’s view, such policies undermine the nation’s legal system, allowing dangerous individuals to remain within U.S. borders. Trump also wants to end birthright citizenship, which he sees as a major draw for illegal immigrants and birth tourism. While the U.S. is one of the few developed countries that still allows automatic citizenship to anyone born on its soil, Trump believes this practice should be abolished. Doing so, he argues, would significantly reduce incentives for illegal entry. Revising the U.S. Census to exclude illegal immigrants is another key issue. States like California and New York, which face population declines due to high taxes and poor governance, continue to receive federal benefits and maintain political influence because illegal residents are counted in the Census. Trump believes this distorts the political landscape and shields states from the consequences of their policies. In terms of energy policy, Trump plans to roll back Biden’s regulations that have made oil and gas drilling more difficult. A top priority would be reopening millions of acres in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil production, potentially boosting U.S. output by a million barrels per day. Increasing domestic production could lower energy prices and reduce dependence on foreign adversaries like Russia and Iran. Another foreign policy priority is reinstating the sanctions Trump imposed on Iran. Under Biden, Iran's oil production has surged, providing the country with significant revenue to fund its aggressive foreign policy. Trump views this as a serious threat to regional stability in the Middle East and aims to counter Iran’s influence by enforcing stricter sanctions. Trump has also proposed a Government Efficiency Commission, an idea endorsed by figures like Elon Musk and JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon. The goal is to streamline the federal bureaucracy, reducing waste and inefficiency. As part of this, Trump wants to cancel Biden’s executive order mobilizing federal agencies to register voters, a task he believes is not the government’s role and is vulnerable to partisan abuse. Revoking the security clearances of former intelligence officials who interfered in the 2020 election is another of Trump’s goals. He has repeatedly criticized the 51 officials who dismissed reports about Hunter Biden’s “laptop from Hell” as Russian disinformation. Now that the reports have been validated, Trump sees their actions as an attempt to mislead the public and influence the election. Trump also plans to eliminate the Department of Defense’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, which cost taxpayers $114 million in 2023. He believes such initiatives are unnecessary and a waste of resources. Finally, Trump’s most crucial priority is securing the integrity of U.S. elections. With over 80 percent of Americans supporting voter ID laws, he aims to make this a national requirement. Trump believes that restoring confidence in the electoral process is vital to ensuring the health of American democracy. If Trump is given the opportunity to return to the White House, he has a bold agenda to implement. From border security to energy independence, his focus remains on making the U.S. stronger and more secure. Based on an opinion from: The Hill 2024-09-30

Ohio Senator JD Vance is approaching a critical moment in his political career as he prepares to debate Minnesota Governor Tim Walz in the vice-presidential face-off next week. The first-term senator, often regarded as a potential future leader of the MAGA movement, will step onto the debate stage amid poor polling numbers and increasing scrutiny over his controversial statements and positions. For Vance, this debate could determine whether he strengthens his political standing or further alienates voters, as he seeks to establish himself as a leading figure in the post-Trump era. Tammy Vigil, a professor of media science at Boston University, said that for Vance, this debate might be a make-or-break moment. “Vance has been in the news so much, for a lot of not-always-positive things,” Vigil said. “He has an opportunity here to either try to change the narrative or reinforce the narrative.” Vance’s political journey began with his memoir *Hillbilly Elegy*, which chronicled his experiences growing up in Appalachia, surrounded by poverty and addiction. A former Marine and venture capitalist, Vance initially criticized Donald Trump but later embraced the former president’s America First agenda. With Trump’s endorsement, Vance won his Senate seat by defeating Democratic challenger Tim Ryan. Since then, he has become one of the most prominent figures in the America First movement. He has also admitted that his past criticism of Trump was misguided, a position Trump himself has accepted, calling Vance a loyal ally. However, Vance’s association with Trump, while boosting his profile, has not insulated him from criticism within his own party. His foreign policy views and lack of political experience have raised doubts among some Republicans, particularly as Trump’s campaign progresses toward the 2024 election. Should Trump lose, he has said he will not run again, positioning Vance as a potential frontrunner for 2028. Yet, current polling presents challenges for Vance, with both he and Trump underwater in favorability ratings. Aggregated polls from The Hill and Decision Desk HQ reveal Vance has a net favorability of -11, with 49 percent of voters viewing him unfavorably. “Vance, at least if you look at the polls, is one of the singularly most unpopular vice presidential candidates around,” said Leonard Steinhorn, a professor of public communication at American University. Whether Vance can shift public opinion during the debate “will depend on A) his demeanor, and B) how well he makes his case, how well he sort of sands the edges of some of the things that he’s been saying,” Steinhorn noted. Among Vance’s most criticized remarks are his previous critiques of Trump and inflammatory comments aimed at Democrats. He faced recent backlash for amplifying a false claim about Haitian migrants and drawing criticism from pop star Taylor Swift for calling out “childless cat ladies,” a comment he defended as sarcastic. While Vance grapples with these issues, his Democratic opponent, Tim Walz, faces his own challenges. Walz, relatively unknown on the national stage, went viral this summer for his humorous critiques of the Trump-Vance ticket. Still, he must introduce himself to a broader audience while contending with attacks from the right about his progressive record and how he has represented his military service. Democratic strategist Steven Maviglio pointed out that, although Walz also faces hurdles, Vance is “more defined, and unfavorably” than his rival. Political analysts agree that the debate could have significant implications for Vance’s future. “In addition to some of Vance’s controversial comments on the trail or in interviews … Vance may have to clean up some of Trump’s comments from the debate,” said Aaron Kall, director of debate at the University of Michigan. Kall noted that Vance’s performance could be crucial as he seeks to present himself as a contender for leadership within the MAGA movement. As Vance prepares for this pivotal moment, the stakes are higher than usual in a race where both Trump and Vice President Harris are closely matched in battleground states. With national polls showing a narrow lead for Harris, the Vance-Walz debate may offer a final opportunity for both campaigns to sway voters, particularly with the likelihood of a second presidential debate appearing slim. The debate will air at 9 p.m. Tuesday Eastern on CBS News, moderated by Norah O'Donnell and Margaret Brennan. Based on a report from: The Hill 2024-09-30

In a stern message to the global community, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned Western nations not to attempt to achieve victory against a nuclear-armed Russia, signaling heightened tensions amid the ongoing war in Ukraine. Speaking at the United Nations General Assembly on Saturday, Lavrov condemned what he described as Western interference in Ukraine and the broader global conflict. His remarks came just days after Russian President Vladimir Putin hinted at adjustments to Russia’s nuclear posture. Lavrov was unable to get to Switzerland due to the EU ban on his plane. As soon as he started speaking on video, ambassadors and other diplomats left the hall as a sign of support for Ukraine. Watch: The United States and European Union quickly criticized Putin’s statements as “irresponsible.” Many viewed Putin’s remarks as a message to the West, particularly the U.S., which has provided substantial military aid to Ukraine. The Biden administration recently announced an additional $2.7 billion in military support for Ukraine, though it stopped short of authorizing long-range weapons capable of striking deep into Russian territory, something Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has long sought. During Lavrov’s UN address, no official response came from the U.S., which had a junior diplomat present during his speech. However, Lavrov’s comments did underscore the continued escalation in rhetoric and military action. Despite Western aid, Russia has made slow but steady gains in eastern Ukraine. At the same time, Ukraine has launched missile and drone strikes on Russian territory, even managing to briefly send troops across the border in a bold incursion last month. Zelenskyy has consistently called for peace, advocating for what he describes as a peace formula that would expel Russian forces from Ukraine, hold war criminals accountable, and secure the release of prisoners of war. Lavrov, however, dismissed Zelenskyy’s peace proposal as a “doomed ultimatum,” casting doubt on the prospects for a diplomatic resolution in the near future. While Western nations continue to back Ukraine, other countries like Brazil and China have begun promoting a peace plan that seeks to bring both sides to the negotiating table without further escalation. This proposal has garnered the support of a dozen countries, primarily in Africa and Latin America, which have joined a coalition of “friends for peace” in Ukraine. Lavrov acknowledged this initiative, stating at a press conference on Saturday that Russia would be open to providing advice and assistance to the group, though he emphasized that any solution must be based on “realities” rather than “abstract conversations.” At the core of Russia’s stance is the belief that the conflict stems from deeper issues, including what Moscow claims is the repression of Russian-speaking populations in eastern Ukraine and NATO’s expansion into Eastern Europe, which Russia views as a threat to its security. Lavrov reiterated that addressing these "root causes" is crucial to resolving the conflict. As the war grinds on into its third year, the danger of further escalation, including the use of nuclear weapons, remains a significant concern for the international community. With diplomatic efforts still struggling to gain traction, the world watches closely as the conflict shows little sign of abating. Based on a report from: The Guardian 2024-09-30

In a moment of swift heroism, Fox meteorologist Bob Van Dillen interrupted a live broadcast to save a woman trapped in her car amid the chaos of Hurricane Helene, a deadly Category 4 storm. The incident occurred early Friday morning as the hurricane wreaked havoc across North Atlanta, Georgia, bringing heavy flooding and strong winds. Watch: Van Dillen struggled to open the car door due to the water pressure, but he quickly instructed the woman to roll her window down. Miraculously, the car’s battery was still working despite being submerged in water. “That allowed the pressure to be equalized and allowed me to pry the door open, unbuckle her seatbelt, put her on me, in my side,” he explained. Reflecting on the rescue, Van Dillen noted that the water was warm, with temperatures around 80 degrees, which provided a bit of comfort in an otherwise dire situation. The fact that the car’s systems hadn’t short-circuited and allowed him to open the door was, in his words, a “miracle.” Hurricane Helene has left a devastating trail in its wake, with more than 37 people reported dead as it continues to batter the southeastern United States with heavy rainfall and dangerous winds. While the storm’s impact has been tragic, moments of bravery like Van Dillen’s serve as a reminder of the resilience and compassion shown by many during times of crisis. Based on a report from: The Independent 2024-09-30

Keir Starmer is preparing to reset the UK's relationship with the European Union, with plans to overhaul Britain's Brexit deal by the spring. This week, the Prime Minister will meet European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels. The talks come amid growing acknowledgment that stronger ties with the EU are crucial as the UK faces economic challenges and the need for growth. One of the key points of contention in the upcoming discussions is youth mobility. Starmer's government remains divided on the issue, particularly due to opposition from Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. Cooper has consistently opposed an agreement that would allow young people to move more freely between Europe and the UK, a proposal seen by many EU diplomats as essential for unlocking broader discussions in the spring. Pedro Serrano, the EU’s ambassador to the UK, recently floated the idea of a limited youth mobility scheme that would make it easier for young Europeans to spend a gap year in Britain and vice versa. However, Starmer rejected the idea of a more comprehensive deal, leaving officials in Brussels uncertain about the UK's intentions regarding closer EU ties. These preliminary talks are expected to lay the groundwork for a more formal EU-UK summit in the spring, where Starmer will meet with von der Leyen and António Costa, the incoming president of the European Council. However, it remains unclear what the outcomes of these discussions will be. Whether Starmer is willing to engage in any form of agreement on youth mobility will be an early indicator of how serious his government is about resetting relations with the EU. EU diplomats have grown frustrated with the UK's characterization of the youth mobility proposal as a form of "free movement of people," pointing out that the scheme would be age- and time-limited. "The EU is particularly keen on youth mobility, which seems to have turned into a test of good faith," said Anand Menon, director of the UK in a Changing Europe think tank. "It’s like they’re saying, ‘if the UK is serious, it’ll make some concessions on this.’ I don’t think they expect to get everything they’re asking for, but some member states are desperate. There’s political pressure to let young people come here. From our point of view, we want to start unlocking some of the kind of small things around the [Brexit deal] that could make life easier." While Downing Street continues to oppose any youth mobility deal, Labour insiders point to Cooper as the leading figure resisting this move due to her desire to curb immigration. “They are blaming Yvette for not being able to do [more], but they know they have to do youth mobility to get anything out of the EU,” one source said. At this stage, Labour is not considering rejoining the EU’s customs union or single market, steps that could have a more profound impact on the UK's economic growth. Within Labour’s ranks, there is some uncertainty about Starmer’s willingness to take significant political risks in order to achieve a meaningful revision of the Brexit deal. "On the Labour side, there’s political pressure to be seen to be doing something," Menon said. "It’s almost the mirror image of the Tories, because they spent a lot of time talking more extremely about the EU than they were willing to act in practice. With Labour, its members and voters want them to have a closer relationship with the EU, so Labour has to do enough to keep those people happy without actually breaching any of its red lines." An EU diplomat welcomed the proposed reset in relations but emphasized that the UK also needs to take proactive steps. “We are missing Great Britain very much on many issues in the council [of EU ministers],” the diplomat said. “A better relationship is very important, but again what is very important is to remember that it was the UK that quit.” Based on a report from: The Guardian 2024-09-30

As Donald Trump gears up for a possible second term in the White House, one of his most significant priorities is a radical overhaul of the Justice Department. His relationship with the agency has long been contentious, and now he is determined to reshape it in ways that would excite his most fervent supporters. The changes he envisions could dramatically alter the department's operations, from investigations to personnel decisions. At the heart of Trump’s grievances is his belief that the Justice Department has unfairly targeted him. “Our justice system is corrupt and discredited, especially as it pertains to the 45th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump,” he declared in a recent statement. Trump has repeatedly accused the department, along with the FBI, of being “obsessed with ‘getting Trump’.” For him, reforming the Justice Department is not just a policy goal but a deeply personal mission, fueled by years of legal battles and investigations. Trump’s retribution-driven agenda has raised alarm bells among critics and even some former supporters. His potential plan to replace career employees with loyalists and launch investigations into those who have prosecuted him has caused concern. Many fear that Trump, if elected again, would be more focused and determined to wield the department as a tool of political vengeance. In his own words, Trump has hinted that winning the presidency in 2024 would be his form of “retribution” against his perceived enemies. One of the key components of Trump’s plan involves appointing a new attorney general who shares his vision of presidential authority. Unlike previous presidents, who have sought to maintain the Justice Department’s independence, Trump wants someone who will act as a loyalist. During his first term, Trump expressed dissatisfaction with his choices for attorney general, including Jeff Sessions, who recused himself from the Russia investigation, and William Barr, who refused to pursue Trump’s baseless claims of voter fraud in 2020. Among the names being considered for the role are John Ratcliffe, former director of national intelligence under Trump, and Senators Eric Schmitt and Mike Lee. Trump has also mentioned figures like Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton and state attorneys general such as Andrew Bailey of Missouri and Kris Kobach of Kansas, both of whom have been involved in lawsuits challenging Biden administration policies. Trump’s allies have even pitched Mark Paoletta, former general counsel for Trump’s Office of Management and Budget, as a potential candidate. While no official decisions have been made, Trump’s campaign has been clear that his focus on the Justice Department will be central to his second term agenda. Campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt noted, “President Trump will choose the best people at the appropriate time.” However, the campaign has been tight-lipped about Trump’s specific priorities for the department. Critics warn that Trump’s approach could undermine the independence of the Justice Department. Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has worked to restore stability to the institution, has consistently rejected claims that the department is politically biased. He points to recent investigations into prominent Democrats, including President Biden’s son, Hunter, as evidence of the department’s impartiality. Yet Trump’s dissatisfaction with the Justice Department runs deep. His frustrations date back to the FBI’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, which led to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller. Although Mueller’s investigation did not find evidence of a criminal conspiracy, it cast a long shadow over Trump’s presidency. Since leaving office, Trump has faced additional legal challenges, including two special counsel investigations under the Biden administration. One focuses on his retention of classified documents, which led to a controversial search of his Mar-a-Lago residence. The other concerns his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol. Trump has vowed to pardon many of those involved in the Capitol riot, calling them political prisoners. In his quest to reform the Justice Department, Trump has suggested eliminating the special counsel system, which is designed to limit political interference in sensitive investigations. He has also signaled a desire to appoint his own prosecutor to investigate the Biden family and other political adversaries. “There needs to be a housecleaning on day one,” said Mike Davis, a legal activist close to Trump. Beyond personnel changes, Trump’s policy goals for the Justice Department include prioritizing religious rights over LGBTQ protections and tackling what he views as left-wing ideology on college campuses. He has also pledged to end investigations into local police departments for civil rights violations and adopt tougher measures to combat violent crime. With the 2024 election approaching, the future of the Justice Department could hinge on the outcome. If Trump wins, his vision for the department could mark a significant departure from its traditional role, setting the stage for a seismic shift in the balance between politics and law enforcement in the United States. Based on a report from: WSJ 2024-09-30

In a brazen repeat of their earlier destructive antics, climate protesters once again targeted Vincent van Gogh’s famed “Sunflowers” paintings at London’s National Gallery. This latest act of vandalism came just hours after two of their fellow activists were sentenced to prison for a similar stunt involving cans of tomato soup in 2022. Watch the Vandalism This incident is reminiscent of the original protest that took place in 2022, when Plummer and Holland caused an estimated $13,000 worth of damage to one of the “Sunflowers” paintings. Their act of protest, which involved gluing their hands to the floor and wall after hurling soup at the artwork, sent shockwaves through the art world. The two eco-activists, dressed in their “Just Stop Oil” shirts, justified their actions by questioning the values of society: “What is more important? Art or the right to have a healthy and sustainable food system?” The court, however, was clear in its response. Earlier on the same day as the latest protest, a jury found Plummer and Holland guilty of criminal damage, and they were sentenced accordingly. Plummer received a two-year sentence, while Holland was given 20 months behind bars. Judge Christopher Hehir, who presided over the case, had strong words for Plummer, saying, “You clearly think your beliefs give you the right to commit crimes when you feel like it.” He added firmly, “You do not.” In her defense, Plummer addressed the court with a broader message, declaring, “It is not just myself being sentenced today, or my co-defendants, but the foundations of democracy itself.” Despite her impassioned plea, the judge’s verdict was a stern reminder that personal convictions do not excuse criminal behavior. This ongoing clash between environmental activists and the institutions they target raises critical questions about the balance between civil disobedience and criminal activity. While the cause of climate change is undeniably urgent, the methods used by groups like “Just Stop Oil” continue to spark heated debate, as art and cultural heritage become unintended battlegrounds in the fight for a sustainable future. Based on a report from: NYP 2024-09-30

Boris Johnson has revealed that he is no longer certain the strict lockdowns during the Covid-19 pandemic played a decisive role in combating the virus. In his memoir *Unleashed*, the former British Prime Minister reflects on the unprecedented restrictions imposed, likening them to medieval measures in their harshness and consequences. He compares himself to the historical figure King Canute, famously known for attempting to command the sea, questioning whether his government’s actions could ever have truly stopped the spread of such a highly contagious virus. Johnson’s memoir marks a significant shift from his previous stance as the leader who enforced some of the most controversial peacetime policies in modern British history. Initially, he believed that the lockdowns were effective in suppressing the virus, but as he began to study the global patterns, his perspective changed. He noted that the waves of the pandemic rose and fell in different countries, regardless of the specific approaches taken by their governments. “There were always two waves, whether you were in China, where lockdowns were ruthlessly enforced, or in Sweden, where they took a more voluntary approach,” he writes. Though Johnson stops short of claiming lockdowns had no effect, he expresses doubt about whether they were truly decisive in reducing the spread of the disease. “I am not saying that lockdowns achieved nothing; I am sure they had some effect. But were they decisive in beating back the disease, turning that wave down? All I can say is that I am no longer sure.” He draws a parallel to King Canute's attempt to prove that no ruler could control the natural elements. Similarly, Johnson now questions whether government actions could truly repel the force of a virus. He notes how the pandemic lockdowns showed society had “barely progressed” from medieval times, referring to restrictions that echoed those imposed during Shakespeare’s era, such as closing theaters and limiting the size of funerals. Johnson also shares his belief that Covid-19 likely originated from a laboratory leak in China, rather than from a wildlife market. “The awful thing about the whole Covid catastrophe is that it appears to have been entirely man-made, in all its aspects,” he writes, speculating that the virus was the result of a botched experiment. This theory, long championed by figures like Donald Trump, has gained more credibility over time, with the FBI recently stating that it believes the virus most likely originated in a Chinese government-controlled lab. Reflecting on the strict measures, Johnson acknowledges that while lockdowns may have had some effect, they conflicted with his long-standing defense of individual liberties. Michael Gove, a senior figure in Johnson’s government and a supporter of tight Covid controls, noted in an inquiry that the lockdown measures ran counter to the former Prime Minister's typical "world view." Iain Duncan Smith, a former Conservative leader and vocal critic of lockdowns, echoed this sentiment, suggesting Johnson was “bullied” by scientists into following the restrictive policies. “Boris realises in hindsight that we had been led down the garden path by the scientists,” Smith commented. Johnson’s memoir also reveals his frustrations with some of the specific policies implemented, describing the tier system in late 2020 as “bonkers.” Comparing the rules to the obscure bans found in Leviticus, he questioned the logic behind many of the measures imposed at the time. The UK recorded just under 227,000 deaths with Covid-19 listed as a cause on death certificates. The most fatal day of the pandemic in the UK occurred on January 19, 2021, during the second lockdown, when 1,490 deaths were reported. Despite these numbers, Johnson’s memoir reflects a growing uncertainty about whether the actions taken during the crisis were truly the best way to handle the unprecedented situation. Based on a report from: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-30

Hassan Nasrallah, the longtime leader of Hezbollah, was killed in airstrikes carried out by Israel in Beirut, according to an Israeli statement released on Saturday. The Lebanese cleric, who had led the militant group since 1992, was reportedly targeted in a Friday attack on an underground command center located in southern Beirut. The destruction of the command center in southern Beirut is seen as part of Israel’s broader efforts to weaken Hezbollah’s infrastructure and leadership. The militant group, which operates with significant Iranian backing, has long been a thorn in Israel’s side, particularly in border clashes and through its military involvement in the Syrian conflict. Nasrallah’s demise could have far-reaching consequences for both Hezbollah and the wider region. His leadership had been marked by a combination of military strategy and political maneuvering, solidifying Hezbollah’s role not only as a militant force but also as a key player in Lebanese politics. The group's ties with Iran and its opposition to Israeli interests have made Nasrallah a figure of both admiration and revulsion, depending on one's perspective in the region. The situation remains fluid, with both sides expected to release more information in the coming days. However, Israel's announcement points to a significant shift in the conflict, potentially paving the way for further escalation between the two long-time adversaries. Based on a report from: Politico 2024-09-28

A couple of off topic and unsubstantiated posts removed, the title of the thread is: Inside Hezbollah’s Secret Tunnels: A Hidden Threat to Israel

In an unusual incident at a nightclub in Leeds, a man with a moustache refused to leave the women's restroom, claiming he "identifies as a woman." The situation unfolded on a student night at The Warehouse, a popular club in West Yorkshire, and left many attendees shocked. Connie Shaw, a 20-year-old student from the University of Leeds, described her encounter with the man, who has not been publicly identified. According to Ms. Shaw, she and a friend had entered the women's lavatory when they noticed the man inside. She recounted how other women in the restroom were already confronting him, telling him to leave. His response to the complaints was a simple, “I identify as a woman.” Connie Shaw Ms. Shaw, a third-year student studying philosophy, ethics, and religion, explained that the man’s response seemed rehearsed, as if he anticipated being questioned about his presence. “He said straight away, ‘I identify as a woman,’ because he knows and other men know that that is what will get them into women’s spaces,” she told *The Telegraph*. She also noted that the man was not using the facilities but was simply standing by a cubicle, watching others. “He wasn’t queuing, he was just standing there with his back to a cubicle just watching,” she added. Following the confrontation, a nightclub bouncer was alerted, and the man was removed from the premises. Ms. Shaw said the man was wearing a black T-shirt and sported a moustache, further fueling the discomfort of the women present. Despite reporting the incident to West Yorkshire Police, Ms. Shaw was informed that no crime had been committed and that it was up to the nightclub to handle the matter. Ms. Shaw, who is writing her dissertation on gender, has since voiced her frustration, particularly regarding the debates surrounding gender identity and women’s rights. A post she shared online about the incident caught the attention of J.K. Rowling, the famous author and outspoken gender-critical campaigner. Reflecting on the experience, Ms. Shaw expressed anger toward activists who claim incidents like this do not occur. “It makes me angry because trans activists say that this never happens – that terfs [trans-exclusionary radical feminists] fear-monger and make these things up,” she said. The issue of female-only spaces has been a contentious topic, especially as debates around gender identity continue to grow. Ms. Shaw emphasized the importance of maintaining these spaces, particularly in environments like nightclubs where women might already feel vulnerable. “There’s a reason why we have separate toilets, especially in a nightclub. We’re regressing. We’re harming young women in particular and violating women’s rights to have safe spaces,” she stated. She added that nightclubs, where incidents of assault are more common, should be especially mindful of maintaining these boundaries. "In a club especially, where you’re more likely to be assaulted in general, there needs to be somewhere for women to have a space." The nightclub, The Warehouse, has yet to release a comment on the incident. Based on a report from: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-28

Alice Webb, a 33-year-old mother of five, has tragically become the first person to die in the UK following a non-surgical liquid Brazilian butt lift (BBL). Alice fell ill shortly after undergoing the procedure and passed away at Gloucestershire Royal Hospital in the early hours of Tuesday morning. Her death has prompted an investigation by Gloucestershire Police, leading to the arrest of two individuals on suspicion of manslaughter. Both suspects have since been released on police bail. The incident has raised serious concerns about the safety of non-surgical BBL procedures. **Save Face**, a UK organization that accredits practitioners offering non-surgical cosmetic treatments, has been actively advocating for a ban on these high-risk procedures. Speaking about Alice's death, Ashton Collins, the director of Save Face, expressed deep frustration, stating, “It makes me incredibly sad and angry that Alice’s death could and should have been prevented.” The organization has been warning the government since December 2023, urging them to take immediate action to outlaw liquid BBLs, which have led to life-threatening complications for many women. Ms. Webb's death marks the first known fatality from a non-surgical BBL in the UK. However, Save Face has reported over 500 women suffering from serious complications, with many developing sepsis or requiring corrective surgery. Ms. Collins emphasized that liquid BBL procedures are often falsely advertised on social media as risk-free and cheaper alternatives to surgical methods. “Liquid BBL procedures are a crisis waiting to happen,” she said. “All of the procedures reported to us were carried out by non-healthcare practitioners who are performing incredibly dangerous procedures in unsterile environments.” The BBL procedure involves the injection of hyaluronic acid to reshape the buttocks. While this procedure is technically legal in the UK, it can be performed by unqualified individuals, increasing the risk of complications. Data has shown that botched procedures have left many women permanently disfigured, requiring extensive corrective surgery. One woman, who spoke to *The Independent*, shared how she was placed in a coma for four days following a liquid bum lift that went wrong, leaving her with long-term pain in her chest and arms. Alice Webb’s death has not only ignited public outrage but also shone a light on the dark side of the booming cosmetic surgery industry, which remains largely unregulated in many aspects. Her partner, Dane Knight, shared a heartfelt message on Facebook, thanking family and friends for their support during this difficult time. He wrote, “Please, please have these five girls’ feelings at heart here.” In what is believed to be Alice’s final Facebook post, she shared a photo of a pumpkin that had been given to her by a relative, captioning it simply: “How cute.” Alice’s best friend, Amy Seville, also took to social media to express her grief. “You were the best friend anyone could ever ask for. I’m heartbroken that you had to grow your angel wings,” she wrote. “Life will never be the same again.” Save Face’s ongoing efforts to ban non-surgical BBLs have gained new urgency following Alice’s death. “We launched a campaign in December 2023 calling upon the government to take urgent action to ban these procedures,” Ms. Collins said, adding, “I am devastated by the news of Alice’s passing.” The debate over the safety of cosmetic procedures, particularly those performed by unqualified individuals, is gaining traction. The Independent has recently reported hundreds of cases of women being rushed to the hospital after receiving botched cosmetic treatments from unregulated practitioners. Despite these warnings, the popularity of such procedures continues to rise, fueled by social media and promises of quick, affordable results. However, as Alice Webb’s tragic death illustrates, the risks of these treatments can be devastating, and the calls for stricter regulation are growing louder. Based on a report from: The Independent 2024-09-28

As I entered the Hezbollah tunnel, which extended from an opening in Israel’s Galilee region, the air was thick with dust. The passage, uncovered by Israeli forces in 2019, spanned half a mile and was dug by Hezbollah fighters using handheld drills. Descending the narrow stairwell, past walls faintly lit by electric cables, it was astonishing to think such a massive structure was created manually, rather than by industrial equipment. Evidence of the labor was everywhere, with circular marks along the walls left by the drills. It must have taken countless hours for Hezbollah’s men to construct this hidden tunnel. There are different types of tunnels in Hezbollah’s arsenal: offensive tunnels along the border, logistical tunnels for moving supplies, and those for storing missiles and air defense systems. They even have tunnels beneath civilian infrastructure, such as football fields and homes, making them harder to target. Hezbollah’s tunnels are only one element of their vast weaponry. Their missile stockpile is believed to be far more advanced than what Hamas has in Gaza, with thousands of missiles capable of reaching deep into Israel, including Iranian-made Fateh-110 and Syrian-made M-600 short-range ballistic missiles. In 2006, Hezbollah shocked Israel when they managed to reverse-engineer Israel’s Spike anti-tank missile, with Iran creating their own version called the Almas missile. This missile, like the original, can be launched from various platforms and poses a serious threat to Israeli forces stationed near the border. Hezbollah has also fired smaller rockets, such as Falaq-1, Falaq-2, and Katyusha artillery rockets, since early October 2023. In 2006, they used the Iranian Fajr-5, but their current arsenal is even more formidable. Despite international efforts after the 2006 war to disarm Hezbollah, the group has only strengthened its military capabilities with the help of Iran and other regional allies. Israeli military experts now view Hezbollah as a far more dangerous adversary than ever before, with trained ground forces numbering around 100,000, including 20,000 full-time combatants. Hezbollah’s tunnel network and missile stockpiles have become an integral part of its strategy, making any future conflict with Israel a complex and deadly proposition. According to former Israeli national security adviser Yaakov Amidror, Israel’s biggest mistake was not addressing the growing threat from Hezbollah sooner. “Before 2006, Israel was addicted to the quietness and was not ready to make any efforts to prevent Hezbollah from building its military capabilities,” he reflected. As tensions rise, the tunnel I visited in 2020 is a reminder of the vast and hidden dangers Israel may face. Colonel Levy, who would later lose his life in the October 7 Hamas attack, summed up the situation grimly: “You need to hate Israel very much to build these things.” Based on a report from: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-28

Naomi Campbell, the iconic supermodel, has defended herself after being disqualified from serving as a charity trustee for five years due to serious mismanagement of funds in her charity, Fashion For Relief. Campbell, 54, founded the charity in 2005 with the goal of alleviating poverty through a combination of fashion and philanthropy. However, an investigation revealed that only a small portion of the charity's spending was allocated to actual charitable causes, while significant amounts were spent on personal luxuries, such as spa treatments and cigarettes. The Charity Commission, which regulates charities in England and Wales, launched an inquiry into Fashion For Relief in 2021, eventually dissolving the organization and removing it from the register of charities earlier this year. The investigation uncovered that only 8.5% of the charity’s expenditures between April 2016 and July 2022 went toward charitable grants. Misconduct included using the charity's funds to pay for Campbell’s stay at a five-star hotel in Cannes, France, along with associated expenses such as room service, spa treatments, and cigarettes. Campbell expressed deep concern over the findings but maintained that she was not in direct control of the charity’s management. “I was not in control of my charity, I put the control in the hands of a legal employer,” she said after being honored with a knighthood in France's Order of Arts and Letters for her contributions to French culture. She assured that an internal investigation was ongoing to determine the full extent of the mismanagement, adding, "We are investigating to find out what and how, and everything I do and every penny I ever raised goes to charity." As a result of the investigation, Campbell was disqualified from serving as a charity trustee for five years, alongside two other trustees, Bianka Hellmich and Veronica Chou, who were banned for nine and four years, respectively. The Charity Commission also recovered £344,000 and safeguarded an additional £98,000 in charitable funds. However, the report found no evidence that the trustees had taken sufficient action to ensure the charity’s fundraising methods were in its best interests or that its expenditures were justifiable. One of the more significant expenditures uncovered by the Charity Commission included a €14,800 (£12,300) flight from London to Nice in 2018 to transport art and jewelry for a fundraising event in Cannes. Additionally, the charity spent €9,400 (£7,800) on a three-night stay for Campbell at a five-star hotel in Cannes, expenses the trustees were unable to justify as cost-effective. Campbell’s personal expenses, totaling nearly €7,940 (£6,600), were also flagged, covering spa treatments, room service, and cigarettes. While the trustees claimed these expenses were often covered by donors, they failed to provide any evidence to support this assertion. Naomi Campbell, who rose to global fame after being discovered as a schoolgirl, was the first Black British model to grace the cover of British Vogue. In addition to her iconic career in fashion, Campbell recently welcomed her second child, a son, in 2023, two years after giving birth to her first child, a daughter, shortly before her 51st birthday. Based on a report from: Sky News 2024-09-28

Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, Britain's first Muslim Cabinet minister, resigned from the Conservative Party last night after the party initiated an investigation into comments deemed “divisive.” Warsi, who has long been a prominent figure in British politics, announced her departure from the party, citing its shift towards the “far Right” as the primary reason for her decision. Warsi, who was appointed to the Cabinet in 2010 by then-Prime Minister David Cameron, faced recent scrutiny for her public comments. Earlier this month, she openly celebrated the acquittal of a protester who had been accused of carrying a placard that referred to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Home Secretary Suella Braverman as “coconuts.” The term "coconut" is widely seen as a racist slur, suggesting a person of color is betraying their community by aligning with white interests. Warsi's subsequent tweet, in which she posted a picture of herself drinking from a coconut, sparked further controversy and led to complaints within the Conservative Party. Kemi Badenoch, a prominent Tory leadership candidate, confirmed that complaints had been lodged following Warsi's tweet. In response to the situation, a Conservative Party spokesperson stated, “Complaints were received regarding divisive language allegedly used by Baroness Sayeeda Warsi. Baroness Warsi was informed an investigation was about to begin earlier this week. We have a responsibility to ensure that all complaints are investigated without prejudice.” Reacting to the investigation, Lady Warsi took to X, formerly known as Twitter, to express her deep disappointment with the direction the Conservative Party has taken. "It is with a heavy heart that I have today informed my whip and decided for now to no longer take the Conservatives’ whip," she wrote. Warsi emphasized that her decision to resign was not taken lightly. “This is a sad day for me. I am a Conservative and remain so, but sadly the current party are far removed from the party I joined and served in Cabinet,” she explained. Warsi voiced her frustration with what she perceived as a growing divide within the party and its treatment of different communities. “My decision is a reflection of how far Right my party has moved and the hypocrisy and double standards in its treatment of different communities,” she stated. Adding to her statement, Warsi declared, “I will not be gagged on a point of principle. And I am not prepared to play games behind closed doors.” Baroness Warsi’s resignation comes just days before the release of her upcoming book, *Muslims Don’t Matter*, which is expected to explore issues of identity and representation in British society. Based on a report from: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-28

A former chief superintendent of the Metropolitan Police has spoken out about the unsettlingly close relationship between Mohamed al Fayed’s Harrods and the police force, describing it as feeling "like a corrupt relationship." Stephen Otter, who held a senior role within the force, made these comments in an interview with Sky News, painting a troubling picture of the interactions between law enforcement and the luxury department store. According to Otter, the Met Police had a "special relationship" with Harrods, one that he was introduced to upon taking up his post in 1999 as borough commander for Kensington and Chelsea. He revealed that the arrangement involved the police providing "additional resources at Christmas," with the officers receiving lavish hampers and enjoying drinks at Christmas parties, all funded by Fayed’s iconic store. Otter recalled being told by another officer that this relationship was mutually beneficial: "which benefits both us and them." Watch: Lawyers representing the alleged victims of Mohamed Al Fayed have said in a new statement that they now represent 60 survivors. Reflecting on his early days in the borough, Otter described being issued with a police car that had been paid for by Harrods. The car, emblazoned with the Harrods logo, looked "more like a Harrods vehicle than a police vehicle." When he attempted to return the car to Harrods, he was met with resistance from a security boss who insisted the arrangement had been in place for years and that other senior officers had benefited from the perks, including Christmas hampers. Otter was told that once he had been around longer, he would "have a better understanding of this relationship." This relationship extended beyond cars and hampers. Otter mentioned how Harrods had its own detention center, which was "better than any detention center" he had seen within the entire Metropolitan Police. As he conducted a review of police operations, Otter concluded that Harrods was receiving a disproportionate level of support. He said, "Our policing of Harrods was like policing a Premiership match, and the risk just literally didn’t support the resources and the attention they got." Complaints from Harrods’ security boss further highlighted the cozy dynamic. Otter was informed that officers regularly visited the store "asking for freebies." When asked if he believed Met officers were corrupt, Otter responded, "I think they probably were," suggesting that the culture had made such behavior normalized. "It felt like a corrupt relationship on both sides," he admitted, emphasizing that Harrods held significant power over the police, with the store having "huge amounts of power over the leaders of the areas of policing around them." One of the more troubling aspects Otter discussed was how this close relationship may have negatively impacted police investigations into Fayed. He alleged that Harrods' security boss had access to sensitive information from the Met due to these ties. He described this as an "insidious infiltration" that not only benefited both parties but also potentially masked and created opportunities for Fayed’s alleged sexual misconduct. "Having a relationship with the police at a high level is so powerful," Otter remarked, underscoring how such influence could have compromised the integrity of investigations. He expressed concerns about the ease with which such relationships could enable individuals to "ring up people and say ‘can you just do a check on this person?’" Such access, he argued, "endangers the legitimacy that the British police service has." Based on a report from: Sky News 2024-09-28

A federal grand jury has indicted several Iranian nationals for their involvement in a hacking operation targeting Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. According to sources familiar with the investigation, the Iranians are accused of stealing internal communications from the campaign earlier this year. Although the specific charges and identities of the defendants have yet to be disclosed, it is reported that the grand jury approved the indictment in secret. The Department of Justice is expected to make an official announcement soon. In the summer, hackers allegedly accessed sensitive documents from Trump’s campaign and distributed them to journalists and individuals associated with President Joe Biden’s reelection team. This occurred before Kamala Harris became the Democratic nominee. Despite the serious nature of the breach, both the Justice Department and Trump’s campaign have refrained from public comment so far. The Trump campaign publicly acknowledged the hack in August after media outlets such as POLITICO received internal materials from an anonymous source. Among the stolen documents was a research dossier on Senator JD Vance, who is Trump’s running mate. The campaign pointed fingers at Tehran for the breach. A subsequent report from Microsoft revealed that in June, Iranian hackers had targeted a senior member of Trump’s campaign with a spear-phishing attack. Earlier this month, U.S. security agencies released a rare statement confirming that stolen materials from Trump’s campaign had indeed been sent to people connected to Biden’s campaign. However, the statement emphasized that there was no evidence the recipients acted on the information. Iranian attempts to infiltrate the Biden campaign have also been documented. Google’s cybersecurity team noted Iranian efforts to breach the campaign, though no evidence suggests these attempts were successful. “Russia, Iran, and China are trying by some measure to exacerbate divisions in U.S. society for their own benefit, and see election periods as moments of vulnerability,” said U.S. security agencies in a statement, highlighting the ongoing foreign efforts to influence American politics. This latest indictment is part of a broader pattern of federal action against foreign hackers, often targeting those in nations that are hostile to the United States. Although it is unlikely that these individuals will ever face arrest due to their location, U.S. officials hope that publicly naming these hackers may serve as a deterrent to future cyberattacks. In a related development, the Trump campaign claimed this week that U.S. intelligence officials informed them of an Iranian plot to assassinate Trump. This follows an earlier case in which a Pakistani man was charged by the Justice Department with plotting on behalf of Iran to kill high-ranking U.S. officials. While the target was not named, reports suggest that Trump was the intended victim. The motive behind these threats is believed to stem from Iran’s desire for revenge after the U.S. assassinated Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020. Soleimani, the former head of Iran’s Quds Force, was killed in a U.S. airstrike ordered by Trump. The Quds Force, responsible for foreign military operations, has long been classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. Since Soleimani’s death, several former Trump administration officials have maintained security due to continued threats from Iran. Foreign interference in U.S. elections has been an ongoing issue for years. In 2016, Russian operatives famously hacked and released emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign, creating a scandal that embarrassed the Democratic nominee. The Russian government also orchestrated a social media campaign to amplify divisions in U.S. society and promote Trump’s candidacy. More recently, the Justice Department charged two employees of Russian state media with funneling money to far-right American social media influencers. The goal of the operation was to spread pro-Trump and anti-Ukraine messages. As the U.S. prepares for another contentious election, foreign efforts to influence American politics show no signs of abating. Based on a report from: Politico 2024-09-28

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre in Long Island, New York, has reached a bankruptcy settlement totaling over $323 million to compensate more than 530 survivors of child sexual abuse. The settlement marks a significant resolution in a case that almost collapsed after initial offers were rejected. Victims had accused priests of abusing them as children, and the long-awaited deal provides a financial remedy for those affected. The diocese, which serves around 1.2 million Catholics in Nassau and Suffolk counties, had earlier faced the possibility of a failed bankruptcy settlement after survivors turned down a previous offer of $200 million. US Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn, overseeing the case in Manhattan, stated that the agreement represented "enormous progress," highlighting how close the settlement had come to collapsing. Under the new agreement, Rockville Centre will contribute $234.8 million to the settlement fund, while four insurers will provide an additional $85.3 million. Further contributions are expected from another insurer currently undergoing a separate insolvency process, as well as from attorneys representing the survivors. Eric Fasano, a spokesperson for the diocese, expressed relief at the settlement, stating that it would ensure “the equitable compensation of survivors of abuse while allowing the church to continue her essential mission.” The settlement follows the diocese’s filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October 2020, a move it made due to the mounting costs of lawsuits related to clergy sexual abuse cases dating back decades. This case is not unique to Rockville Centre. In recent years, more than two dozen Catholic dioceses in the United States have filed for bankruptcy after states, including New York, passed laws allowing victims of child sexual abuse to sue for decades-old crimes. This settlement may set a precedent for other dioceses facing similar claims. For example, the Archdiocese of New Orleans, which filed for bankruptcy in May 2020, recently proposed a $62.5 million settlement. However, claimants in that case are pushing for a higher settlement of $217 million, with expectations that insurers could contribute an additional $800 million. The legal landscape for these dioceses has shifted dramatically following a recent US Supreme Court ruling. The ruling, related to the bankruptcy of OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma, restricted the ability of bankruptcy courts to offer broad legal protections to non-bankrupt entities contributing to settlement funds. This ruling has forced Catholic dioceses to find new methods of securing contributions from insurers and parishes, which had traditionally provided funds in exchange for protection from further lawsuits. To overcome these challenges, Rockville Centre devised a solution by agreeing to have all of its parishes file for bankruptcy. This allowed the parishes to subject their assets and liabilities to court oversight, which in turn enabled them to gain legal protections. According to the diocese's attorney, Corinne Ball, insurers then agreed to buy back their policies from both the diocese and the parishes, effectively ending their responsibility for covering the sexual abuse claims. The settlement brings a degree of closure to the survivors and the diocese, though the trauma and pain inflicted by the abuse will remain. With more dioceses across the country grappling with similar claims, the Rockville Centre settlement may offer a framework for others to follow. Based on a report from: The Guardian 2024-09-28