Social Media

The Economist announced its endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris on Thursday, citing concerns about the “unacceptable risk” that a second term for former President Donald Trump would pose to both America and the world. The influential U.K.-based publication, which has a history of supporting Democratic candidates in U.S. elections since endorsing John Kerry in 2004, highlighted Trump’s potential impact on critical issues, including economic stability, the rule of law, and global peace. The editorial team at The Economist acknowledged Harris' limitations, describing her as “underwhelming” but ultimately deeming her shortcomings as “ordinary” and not disqualifying. They argue that Harris, despite her perceived flaws, represents a far safer choice for America and its role on the global stage than her Republican opponent. The editors underscore the gravity of the choice facing American voters, stating, “By making Mr. Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace.” The publication’s endorsement comes amid mounting concern among international economists and leaders over Trump’s policy proposals and governance style. Recently, nearly two dozen Nobel Prize-winning economists publicly expressed their support for Harris’ economic plans, describing them as “vastly superior” to Trump’s. In their statement, The Economist editorial team underscored the dangers they see in Trump’s potential return to office. “We cannot quantify the chance that something will go badly wrong: nobody can,” they explain, further cautioning voters against underestimating the risks. “But we believe voters who minimize it are deluding themselves.” As Harris continues to campaign, endorsements like The Economist’s add a dimension of international perspective to the U.S. election, particularly from an established, respected voice known for its global outlook. The publication's assessment reflects not only concerns about domestic issues but also a broader apprehension over how American leadership influences global stability and economic progress. Based on a report by Daily Beast 2024-11-02

The International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) recent endorsement of Rachel Reeves’s budget has stirred controversy in the UK, with critics calling it a blow to working people struggling under rising taxes and slow wage growth. In a statement, the IMF praised the budget, particularly its aim to reduce the deficit through sustainable revenue measures and a plan to increase public investment, which they believe will spur growth and address crucial public service needs. "We support the envisaged reduction in the deficit over the medium term, including by sustainably raising revenue,” an IMF spokesperson remarked. The budget’s strategic increases in public investment were also applauded as necessary steps toward addressing urgent issues in public services. However, Robert Jenrick, a potential leader within the Conservative Party, expressed frustration with the IMF’s stance, describing it as a “slap in the face” to working citizens already stretched by rising taxes. Jenrick criticized the IMF's support of the budget's tax measures, especially given that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) projects these tax increases will slightly hinder economic growth over the next decade. The OBR warns that living standards, particularly as measured by disposable income adjusted for inflation, will experience slower growth due to higher employer National Insurance contributions. Jenrick’s criticism went further, calling the budget "gloom-and-bust," a reference to fears it may trigger higher inflation and escalating national debt. “This gloom-and-bust Budget is predicted by the OBR to lower growth, increase inflation, and cause debt to balloon. For working people being crippled by higher taxes, the IMF’s comments welcoming this Budget will feel like a slap in the face,” Jenrick stated. The IMF’s support has not been universally shared among economists, either. Douglas McWilliams, deputy chairman of the Centre for Economics and Business Research, was openly skeptical of the IMF’s assessment, questioning both the reliability of the Fund’s forecasts and its understanding of policy. McWilliams argued, “The IMF does not have a great track record of either forecasting or understanding policy. If you keep getting your forecasts wrong, it calls into doubt virtually everything else you do.” He further explained that slowing growth, as projected by the OBR, is likely to reduce tax revenues, which could mean higher borrowing down the line. “So the numbers on which the IMF is commenting on are almost certainly wrong,” he added. Rachel Reeves, the architect of the budget, has maintained that her plans are designed as a “once in a parliament Budget.” Still, she has conceded that further tax hikes may be necessary in the future. Despite her assertion, concerns linger that Britain’s tax burden is on course to reach a historic high, potentially hitting 38.2% by the end of the decade. This would be a significant rise, marking an increase of 5.1 percentage points compared to pre-pandemic levels. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-02

A Chicago man has been charged with terrorism and hate crimes following a violent attack on a Jewish man who was walking to his synagogue. Police have reported that the suspect, 22-year-old Sidi Mohamed Abdallahi, is accused of not only shooting at the Jewish man but also firing multiple times at police officers and paramedics who responded to the scene. Terrifying moment captured on camera: In addition to terrorism and hate crime charges, Abdallahi faces six counts of attempted first-degree murder, seven counts of aggravated discharge of a firearm, and one count of aggravated battery with a firearm. His next court appearance is scheduled for November 7. Superintendent Snelling emphasized the importance of a thorough investigation to ensure that the charges were properly founded, denying that the charges were influenced by public or media pressure. "There must be sufficient evidence to support hate crimes and terrorism charges, and it was important we took our time to thoroughly investigate and confirm that this was indeed a crime of that nature,” Snelling said. He added, “We will never go out in public, make statements, allegations, accusations or attempt to bring charges without any proof of what we’re attempting to charge someone for.” Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson condemned the attack, describing it as an assault on the city’s values and calling hate toward the Jewish community “hideous” and “wicked.” Johnson spoke out strongly against antisemitism, stating, “This is not just an attack against our beloved community of Jewish people; this was an attack against us as a city.” He affirmed that no one in Chicago should live in fear because of their beliefs, religion, or identity. Johnson assured the Jewish community that “we’re using every aspect of government to ensure that they are safe.” Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx remarked on the rarity of terrorism charges and highlighted the gravity of Abdallahi’s actions. “This charge sends a clear message: Any acts that seek to destabilize our communities through fear and hatred will face the fullest measure of accountability under the law,” Foxx stated. She added that the crime was not simply meant to intimidate but aimed to “inflict terror.” The Midwest branch of The Anti-Defamation League issued a statement on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday, acknowledging that the charges appropriately reflect the severity of the crime. “We must all turn our attention to supporting the victim and the West Rogers Park Jewish community as they recover from this heinous act,” the statement read. Abdallahi, a Mauritanian national, was first encountered by US Border Patrol in San Ysidro, California, on March 31, 2023, according to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Following his recent arrest, ICE “lodged an immigration detainer with Cook County Jail” on Tuesday, spokesperson Erin Bultje confirmed in a statement. ICE has not provided further information about his immigration status. Meanwhile, the victim of the shooting was discharged from the hospital on Saturday afternoon. Chicago's 50th Ward Alderman Debra Silverstein shared relief at his condition, expressing gratitude that he did not suffer life-threatening injuries. Superintendent Snelling also reflected on the long-term impact this event might have on the survivor, stating, “Thankfully, this victim did not suffer life-threatening injuries. We know that this is something that he’s going to have to deal with the rest of his days.” Based on a report by CNN 2024-11-02

Following the release of a documentary detailing alleged abuses by Mohamed al Fayed, the former Harrods and Fulham FC owner, over 400 individuals have come forward with testimonies, according to the Justice for Harrods Survivors group. These allegations span various accusations, including rape, attempted rape, sexual assault, and the abuse of minors. Many individuals who have spoken out had connections to Harrods, Fulham FC, and other locations linked to Fayed's business empire. Among those who have come forward is Bianca Gascoigne, daughter of former footballer Paul Gascoigne, who alleges that Fayed groomed and assaulted her when she worked as a teenager at Harrods. In addition, Ronnie Gibbons, a former Fulham Women captain, claims she was twice assaulted by Fayed. The allegations build on 21 previous claims made by women to the Metropolitan Police between 2005 and 2023, demonstrating a long-standing pattern of accusations. Harrods, the luxury department store formerly owned by Fayed from 1985 to 2010, has publicly distanced itself from the allegations. The company stated it is “utterly appalled” by the claims and emphasized that it is a “very different organization to the one owned and controlled by Fayed.” Based on a report by Sky News 2024-11-02

A New Zealand judge is set to determine whether the owners of Whakaari, the volcanic island where a tragic eruption in 2019 took the lives of 22 tourists and guides, were unjustly convicted. The three-day appeal hearing concluded Thursday, and Justice Simon Moore informed the High Court in Auckland that he would reach a decision by the end of the year. The owners’ company, Whakaari Management, controlled by three brothers, was previously convicted for not ensuring visitor safety on the island. This March, the company was ordered to pay substantial fines and restitution to the victims, most of whom were U.S. and Australian tourists who had traveled to the island by cruise ship. Following the conviction, Whakaari Management quickly appealed, with the case’s primary question being whether the company had a legal responsibility for visitor safety under New Zealand’s workplace health and safety laws. The case has spurred a debate on whether Whakaari Management should have been held accountable as an authority responsible for workplace safety on the island, as argued by New Zealand’s workplace regulator. Lawyers representing the regulator stated that Whakaari Management’s entire business model revolved around granting access to a naturally hazardous location, charging permit fees to tourists and scientific groups alike. As the prosecutor Kirsty McDonald argued in court, the company “had a duty to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, that the workplace it was granting access to was without risks to the health and safety of any person.” Prosecutors contended that the company should have carried out risk assessments to determine whether it was even safe for tourists to be allowed on the island. However, attorneys for Whakaari Management have countered that the company acted only as a landlord, merely granting access to Whakaari, rather than managing or supervising the tours themselves. Rachael Reed, a lawyer representing the company, argued, “the company did not run, direct or supervise the tours,” maintaining that responsibility for visitor safety lay with the tour operators, not with Whakaari Management. The legal team further emphasized that the conviction, if upheld, could have significant implications on how other landowners allow public access to natural sites across New Zealand. They argued that a precedent set by this case could discourage landowners from allowing visitors to areas with natural hazards, impacting the nation’s adventure tourism industry. Before the 2019 eruption, Whakaari—also known as White Island—was a favored tourist destination, reachable by boat or helicopter from the Bay of Plenty on New Zealand’s North Island. On the fateful December day, 47 individuals, including tourists and tour guides, were present on the island when superheated steam erupted from the volcano. Some visitors were killed instantly, while others sustained severe burns. Survivors recounted in court that they had been unaware of the risks posed by the active volcano and were not provided with any protective equipment. Many were wearing clothing that worsened the impact of the burns they suffered. Judge Evangelos Thomas, who initially ruled on the case, noted in his judgment that Whakaari Management failed to undertake a necessary risk assessment, despite a prior eruption on the island three years earlier. He ruled that the company should have sought expert guidance to evaluate the dangers and, based on that advice, either restricted public access entirely or implemented rigorous safety controls. In 2023, New Zealand’s workplace safety regulator charged 13 entities and individuals, including Whakaari Management, for safety lapses related to the eruption. Among these were helicopter and boat tour operators, a scenic flight operator, and the scientific agency GNS Science. Several of the parties accepted their charges, while others, including Whakaari Management, contested them. Some charges were subsequently dropped. The appeal’s outcome is eagerly awaited, with Justice Moore reserving his decision, yet refraining from committing to a specific date. The result could have profound effects on the responsibilities of companies offering access to natural attractions, potentially reshaping the regulatory landscape for adventure tourism in New Zealand. Original Court case Conviction Based on a report by AP 2024-11-02

A new report has advised citizens of the European Union to stockpile emergency supplies in anticipation of potential conflict or other severe crises. The report, published on Wednesday, was prepared by former Finnish President Sauli Niinistö in his role as Special Adviser to the President of the European Commission. In it, Niinistö warns that the EU’s current approach to crisis management is largely reactive and must become more proactive. Highlighting lessons learned from recent crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the report stresses the importance of individual preparedness and self-reliance. It recommends that EU member states encourage households to stockpile essential goods, sufficient for at least 72 hours, in preparation for any emergency. Such supplies include food, water, medicine, flashlights, and a battery-powered radio, among other critical items. The goal, according to the report, is to better equip citizens for a range of crises, from pandemics to extreme weather events or even armed conflict. This advice aims to avoid the widespread shortages experienced during the pandemic when people began panic-buying essential items. Although the report considers several potential threats, it highlights Russian aggression as a significant concern. “We do not have a clear plan on what the EU will do in the event of armed aggression against a Member State. The threat of war posed by Russia to European security forces us to address this as a centerpiece of our preparedness, without undermining the work to prepare for other major threats,” the report states. The report underscores that the EU’s security is interconnected across all its 27 member states. Any aggression against one member would inevitably affect the bloc as a whole. “The territorial integrity and political independence of every Member State is inextricably linked with that of other Member States, and the EU as a whole,” the document asserts. Niinistö’s report recommends empowering EU citizens as central to a successful crisis readiness strategy. He emphasizes that the EU must work to raise awareness and foster a sense of self-reliance across its population. Additionally, the report suggests significant increases in security investments, proposing that at least 20 percent of the EU’s budget should be allocated toward security and crisis preparedness. Enhanced intelligence sharing among EU member states is also advised to improve response coordination and strategic planning. The 165-page document, which was formally presented to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, marks a substantial call for a shift in EU policy. Niinistö’s recommendations indicate a pressing need to bolster both civilian and military defenses, preparing for potential threats to the EU’s collective security. By adopting these preparedness measures, the EU seeks to reassure its citizens of greater protection against a wide range of possible emergencies, while remaining vigilant of escalating threats. Based on a report by Newsweek 2024-11-02

Germany has ordered the closure of all three Iranian consulates within its borders following Iran’s execution of Iranian-German national Jamshid Sharmahd, a 69-year-old dissident who resided in the United States. This decision, announced Thursday by German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, underscores a significant diplomatic fallout between Germany and Iran and leaves the Islamic Republic with only its embassy in Berlin. Sharmahd, who had been living in Glendora, California, was detained in 2020 after being kidnapped from Dubai by Iranian security forces while attempting to travel to India for business. On Monday, he was executed by Iranian authorities on terrorism charges, stemming from allegations of his involvement in a 2008 mosque bombing that killed 14 people and injured over 200 others. Iran further accused him of plotting additional attacks through the Kingdom Assembly of Iran and its militant wing, Tondar, as well as disclosing sensitive information about Iran’s missile sites during a 2017 television appearance. His family, however, has maintained his innocence, rejecting the charges as fabricated. Germany, the United States, and international human rights groups condemned Sharmahd’s trial, describing it as a “sham.” The German Foreign Ministry summoned Iran’s charge d’affaires to protest the execution, and German Ambassador Markus Potzel raised objections to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi before being recalled to Berlin for further consultations. Baerbock stated that her government had made it clear to Tehran that executing a German citizen would carry serious repercussions, emphasizing that Sharmahd’s case was central to discussions with Araghchi in New York only a month prior. “The latest comments by the Iranian foreign minister, in which he puts the cold-blooded murder of Jamshid Sharmahd in the context of German support for Israel, also speak for themselves,” Baerbock said. “Iran’s government knows above all the language of blackmail, threat, and violence.” Iran responded to Germany’s outcry with defiance. Foreign Minister Araghchi dismissed the protests, asserting that “a German passport does not provide impunity to anyone, let alone a terrorist criminal,” and accused Baerbock of “gaslighting.” He further contended that Germany was an “accomplice” in what he described as an “ongoing Israeli genocide,” referring to Germany’s alliance with Israel amidst rising tensions in Gaza and Lebanon. This diplomatic clash represents one of Germany’s rare moves to close foreign consulates, indicating a serious deterioration in relations. Last year, Germany similarly directed Russia to close four of its five consulates following diplomatic restrictions imposed on German missions in Russia. Baerbock remarked that diplomatic relations with Iran had already been “at more than a low point” and reiterated Germany’s intent to advocate for the release of other German nationals detained in Iran. At a broader level, the execution has further strained Iran’s ties with the European Union. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell stated Tuesday that “the execution of a European citizen is seriously harming relations between Iran and the European Union.” He added that the EU would “now consider targeted and significant measures,” without specifying further details. Baerbock highlighted that the EU had recently imposed new sanctions on Iran and expressed support for designating Iran’s Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Sharmahd’s family last received a message from him on July 28, 2020. Although the details surrounding his abduction remain unclear, tracking data indicated that his phone moved south from Dubai into Oman before the signal disappeared in Sohar. Two days later, Iranian authorities claimed to have captured Sharmahd in a “complex operation” and later released a photograph of him blindfolded. The diplomatic response has intensified since then, with Germany even expelling two Iranian diplomats last year over Sharmahd’s initial death sentence. The case has reignited international debate over Iran’s treatment of dissidents and Germany’s stance against Iran’s approach to foreign relations and human rights abuses. Based on a report by AP 2024-11-02

Former President Donald Trump has launched a $10 billion lawsuit against CBS News, claiming that the network deceptively edited an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris to sway public opinion and unfairly bolster her image. Trump’s legal team contends that the alleged editing was intended to mislead voters by presenting Harris’ responses on the sensitive issue of the Israel-Hamas conflict in a favorable light for the Democrats. Trump’s attorneys argue that these selective edits, which were not made publicly available in their uncut form, are part of a broader CBS strategy “to tip the scales in favor of the Democratic Party” through news distortion that was “intended to confuse, deceive, and mislead the public.” The suit also references Trump’s prior public call for CBS to release the unedited transcript, which he claims would reveal bias and selective framing. CBS responded to the lawsuit, refuting the claims as “completely without merit.” A spokesperson for the network stated that “60 MINUTES fairly presented the Interview to inform the viewing audience, and not to mislead it,” affirming the network’s commitment to responsible and unbiased journalism. CBS had previously acknowledged trimming Harris’ response, maintaining that it was a necessary edit to include more content within the program’s allotted time. “When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate, and on point,” the network had said on October 20. The legal filing calls for a jury trial and substantial damages, alleging that CBS’s actions violate Texas laws prohibiting deceptive acts in business practices. Trump, who has previously declined interview requests from “60 Minutes,” has labeled the alleged editing as potentially “the Biggest Scandal in Broadcast History.” CBS has stated it intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-02

In an upcoming documentary, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson shared an experience he claims involved a demon attack. Carlson, known for his outspoken views, recounted the unusual expereince, which he says left him with visible injuries and shook his understanding of the supernatural. The segment was filmed as part of *Christianities*, a crowdfunded documentary that explores various Christian traditions and experiences, although the exact timing of Carlson’s interview is unclear. This isn't the first time Carlson has mentioned an interest in the supernatural. The Wall Street Journal reported that he discussed demonic forces in a conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, allegedly telling Putin, “demonic possession is real, I happen to know for a fact.” Carlson’s apparent belief in such forces aligns with some statements made by his supporters, particularly following his departure from Fox News last April. During that period, Carlson, who once referred to former President Donald Trump as a “demonic force” in a text message during the January 6 insurrection, faced significant media scrutiny. Carlson’s firing sparked reactions among his Christian followers, with some asserting that his departure was due to spiritual warfare. Texas-based televangelist Lance Wallnau, in particular, claimed that Carlson’s exit from the network was a win for the “devil,” stating, “Tucker is a casualty of [the spiritual] war. I don’t like it when the devil wins.” Carlson’s story has sparked curiosity and speculation, though his representatives have not commented publicly on the claims. The documentary clip adds a new dimension to the former host’s outspoken persona, revealing his thoughts on faith, the supernatural, and his belief that his unusual experience with “something unseen” has left a lasting impact on his worldview. Based on a report by Daily Beast 2024-11-02

Conspiracey post on the the Kalerghi Plan removed. Repeat and it will be more than the post removed

A troll post and reply has been removed.

Off topic troll posts removed @BruceWayne

Israel's recent accusations of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) colluding with Hamas have intensified scrutiny of the organization’s role in Gaza, threatening the delivery of critical humanitarian aid. In February, the Israeli Defense Force announced the discovery of a Hamas data center under the UNRWA headquarters in Gaza's Rimal neighborhood. According to Colonel Benny Aharon, “UNRWA provides cover for Hamas, UNRWA knows exactly what is happening underground, and UNRWA uses its budget to fund some of Hamas’s military capabilities, this is for certain.” This discovery, along with tunnels found beneath UNRWA schools, has raised serious questions about UNRWA’s relationship with Hamas. The controversy deepened when footage emerged allegedly showing an UNRWA employee loading the body of an Israeli victim into an SUV during the Oct. 7 attacks, sparking Israeli outrage. While UNRWA spokesperson Jonathan Fowler commented that verifying the footage was impossible, the video strained relations further. The Knesset recently passed laws banning UNRWA operations in Israel-controlled areas, marking an unprecedented rupture between Israel and the UN agency. As the primary provider of essential services for Palestinians in Gaza, UNRWA is viewed by many as vital for basic healthcare, education, and humanitarian aid. However, it has also come under fire from organizations like the independent UN Watch group, which has documented what it claims are UNRWA’s links to terrorism and Islamist ideology. Hillel Neuer, UN Watch’s chief executive, argues, “UNRWA has kept Palestinians in a state of dependency for 75 years. Rather than help make Gaza into Tel Aviv 2.0, they have told Palestinians their homes are not in Gaza but in Israel, nurturing grievance, revenge, and terrorism.” UNRWA, established in 1949 following the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, is the only UN agency dedicated exclusively to a specific region. Predominantly funded by the U.S., European countries, and the UK, which contributed £35 million in the past year, UNRWA provides essential support in Gaza. Yet, revelations of Hamas-aligned individuals within its staff complicate the situation. Neuer asserts, “For the past 10 years we have been monitoring UNRWA staff’s support for terrorism on public social media,” citing posts glorifying Adolf Hitler and praising violence against Jews. While UNRWA dismissed some staff after these findings, many were reinstated, such as Fathi al-Sharif, a teachers’ union leader in Lebanon who was suspended but later returned following protests. Further complicating matters is Suhail al-Hindi, former head of UNRWA’s teachers’ union in Gaza, whose affiliation with Hamas’ politburo was widely suspected for years before his dismissal in 2017. With prominent staff accused of supporting Hamas, Israel’s decision to ban UNRWA complicates both the organization’s ability to provide aid and the Western nations’ humanitarian involvement in Gaza. Despite these connections, some argue that while Hamas’ influence in Gaza may be significant, it does not directly implicate UNRWA’s relief mission. Yet Israel’s stance effectively formalizes a distrust of UNRWA, hardening the divide and making a peaceful resolution to this tense dynamic seem even more elusive. The Knesset, has effectively ended Israel’s dealings with UNRWA and banned it from any Israeli-controlled territory. This is due to take place in 3 months. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-01

The new government’s bold claim to “honesty with voters” has unraveled quickly, as its first Budget reveals a path fraught with challenges for Britain. In any administration, the first Budget after a prolonged period in opposition is a defining moment, laying out campaign promises as policy and setting a clear direction for the country. Labour’s initial pledge to avoid tax increases and stimulate growth was quickly contradicted, however, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves implementing a substantial £40 billion tax hike—one of the most significant in recent history, despite concerns that it may dampen economic momentum. In addition to this tax increase, Reeves is taking on significant borrowing, which she once promised to avoid in favor of “balancing the books.” The funds are intended for expansive public spending projects, a move that will undoubtedly drive inflation, keep interest rates high, and place additional financial burdens on future generations. Reeves contends that the spending will pay off, suggesting that these costs will be worth it for future generations, who will supposedly benefit from improved infrastructure, science initiatives, transportation, and enhanced educational and housing facilities. However, her most substantial allocation is to the National Health Service (NHS), receiving an additional £22 billion for daily operations without any proposed reforms or productivity goals attached. While Reeves points to a forthcoming “10-year plan” by Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who promises systemic improvements next year, past reforms suggest caution. History has shown that without a fundamental overhaul, the injection of funds into the NHS often fails to yield meaningful improvements, with much of the allocated money absorbed by inefficiencies and administrative costs. Reeves’s Budget has also broken several campaign promises. The government had vowed to leave National Insurance rates untouched and not manipulate fiscal figures to justify borrowing—commitments it quickly abandoned. Labour’s claim of a £22 billion “black hole” in the finances, meant to justify their tax measures, was revealed to be more fiction than fact, lacking support from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Instead, the OBR’s forecast projects growth to peak at only 2% before dropping, undermining Labour’s growth ambitions and prompting Reeves to reference a vague “long-term growth” projection, which lacks immediate relevance. This cautious economic outlook did little to dampen Labour MPs’ enthusiasm for Reeves, who was celebrated by her peers as she asserted that her policies would stimulate economic growth, portraying herself as a kind of modern-day economic “alchemist.” Despite her optimism, history shows that true growth is more often driven by businesses and entrepreneurs than government policies. Reeves’s approach, however, may stifle that entrepreneurial drive, as her Budget introduces new tax pressures and regulations. Labour’s Budget brings a hefty increase to the National Minimum Wage, including a 16% hike for workers aged 18 to 20. While framed by the Chancellor as a benefit, this cost ultimately falls on businesses. Reeves has also introduced new employee rights, estimated to cost employers £5 billion, while increasing National Insurance rates from 13.8% to 15%. Employers will now also start paying National Insurance at a lower income threshold—reduced from £9,100 to £5,000—adding £615 in National Insurance for every qualifying employee. Known as a “tax on jobs,” these changes will likely limit job creation, leading businesses to reconsider growth plans. This policy has been described by some as a “poll tax on business” that dampens innovation and expansion at a critical moment for the economy. Notably, none of the senior ministers in the current government have direct business experience, raising questions about the administration’s grasp of private sector dynamics. The National Insurance hike alone is expected to raise £25 billion, placing the revenue burden for public spending largely on businesses—the very engines of economic growth. Reeves defends these tax measures, arguing that businesses will ultimately benefit from improved schools, healthcare, and housing. While this may hold some truth, these benefits mean little to companies if they struggle to remain profitable under increased financial obligations. Overseas investors, whom Reeves claims she is keen to attract, may also be dissuaded by the new Capital Gains Tax hike, increased stamp duties, and stricter regulations on non-domiciled residents. Such changes pose significant deterrents for potential investors, who may think twice before bringing capital to the UK under such conditions. During the campaign, Conservatives warned that Labour would revert to its historical trend of tax hikes, increased spending, and heavy borrowing. True to form, the new government has done precisely that, contradicting its earlier promises. Rishi Sunak, the outgoing Opposition leader, summarized the situation succinctly, arguing that Labour’s supposed commitment to integrity and transparency with voters has already been exposed as a façade. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-01

In a move that highlights the complex interplay between his political alliances and business priorities, Elon Musk’s Tesla has publicly endorsed California’s climate policy to promote electric vehicles, even as former President Donald Trump, a political ally of Musk, vows to dismantle it if he is reelected. While some Republicans argue that California's plan will drive up gas prices, Musk’s electric car company insists the policy is beneficial both economically and environmentally, supporting California’s low-carbon fuel standard, which sets emissions limits for all transportation fuels sold in the state. Tesla joined other electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers, including Hyundai, GM, Audi, and Rivian, in urging California lawmakers to maintain the low-carbon fuel standard. In a letter to lawmakers on October 24, Tesla and its peers stated, “This program has achieved significant economic and environmental benefits for Californians, and we strongly support its continued advancement to drive even greater progress.” The letter, exclusively obtained by Politico, reflects a unified front among EV manufacturers, despite Musk’s political alliance with Trump. Musk’s support of California’s climate initiatives brings attention to a growing friction between his political and business interests. As Tesla and other EV companies advocate for policies that incentivize the adoption of electric vehicles, Trump has moderated his criticism of EVs in light of Musk’s influence as a campaign surrogate. Nevertheless, Trump remains committed to overturning California’s leading electric vehicle regulations. At a recent rally in Southern California, he declared, “I would not allow California politicians to get away with their plan to impose a 100 percent ban on the sale of gas-powered cars and trucks.” California has set ambitious goals to phase out the sale of combustion engine trucks by 2045 and gas-powered cars by 2035, which Trump has targeted as a key point of opposition. The policy updates proposed for California’s low-carbon fuel standard have also sparked debate among Congressional Republicans. Representatives Michelle Steel and David Valadao, both facing challenging reelection campaigns, joined other Republicans in opposing the amendments. On October 24, they signed a letter urging California regulators to delay the upcoming vote, citing concerns over potential gas price hikes, with state regulators previously estimating the amendments could increase costs by as much as 47 cents per gallon. California Governor Gavin Newsom has consistently backed the low-carbon fuel standard in the face of opposition from the oil industry and state Republicans. He has also pursued measures to address California’s high gas prices, including pushing for greater oversight of oil refiners and advocating for increased ethanol content in gasoline to help lower costs. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is set to vote on the proposed amendments to the low-carbon fuel standard on November 8, a decision that will be closely watched by both supporters and critics. As the state leads the charge for cleaner transportation, Tesla’s endorsement underscores the company’s alignment with California’s environmental goals, even as its founder navigates a complicated political landscape with allies who hold opposing views on the future of clean energy. Based on a report by Politico 2024-11-01

North Korea launched an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on Thursday, marking its longest recorded flight to date. The missile was in the air for an unprecedented 86 minutes, covering over 1,000 kilometers before descending into waters east of North Korea, according to reports from South Korea and Japan. The missile was launched at a sharply angled trajectory, reaching an altitude of around 7,000 kilometers (4,350 miles). Experts indicated that if launched on a flatter, horizontal trajectory, the missile could have achieved a much greater range, signaling North Korea's growing capability to cover extensive distances. The launch comes amid escalating tensions between North and South Korea, with Pyongyang adopting increasingly aggressive language and actions toward Seoul. Just a day before the missile test, South Korea warned that the North could be planning to conduct an ICBM launch close to the U.S. presidential election on November 5. The South Korean defense ministry stated that the recent test appeared aimed at developing capabilities for weapons that could “fire farther and higher.” In response to the test, South Korea announced plans to impose new sanctions on North Korea, a move intended to pressure Pyongyang into halting its missile developments. The United States was quick to condemn the launch as well. In a statement, Sean Savett, spokesperson for the White House’s National Security Council, called it a “flagrant violation of multiple UN Security Council resolutions.” He added that North Korea’s action “only demonstrates that [North Korea] continues to prioritize its unlawful weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programmes over the well-being of its people.” Pyongyang’s recent actions defy international sanctions that have long been in place. The last time North Korea launched an ICBM, in December 2023, the missile stayed airborne for 73 minutes and traveled approximately 1,000 kilometers. In a rare same-day report in North Korean state media, leader Kim Jong Un characterized Thursday's launch as a demonstration of North Korea’s “will to respond to our enemies” and described it as “appropriate military action.” Kim emphasized that “[North Korea] will never change its line of bolstering up its nuclear forces.” Experts believe this latest launch was likely aimed at enhancing the payload capacity of North Korea’s missile technology. Kim Dong-yup, an assistant professor at the University of North Korean Studies, commented that Pyongyang has been developing missiles capable of reaching the U.S. mainland, even with larger and potentially multiple warheads. Japan closely monitored Thursday's launch, while South Korean and U.S. officials convened soon afterward, pledging to “take strong and varied response measures,” according to a statement from the South Korean military. They emphasized the importance of sharing North Korean ballistic information among South Korean, U.S., and Japanese authorities, with the South reaffirming its full readiness to respond to further developments. The launch coincides with growing concerns that North Korea is deepening its alliance with Russia. Recently, South Korean and U.S. authorities accused Pyongyang of sending troops to Russia to support Vladimir Putin's campaign in Ukraine. The Pentagon estimates that approximately 10,000 North Korean soldiers have been deployed to training areas in eastern Russia, with a smaller contingent reportedly stationed in Russia’s west, near Kursk. The U.S. reported earlier this week that thousands more North Korean troops are en route to Russia. While North Korea and Russia have yet to confirm or deny these allegations, the perceived presence of North Korean troops in Russia has only heightened concerns over the burgeoning partnership between Putin and Kim, signaling new complexities in the region’s already fraught dynamics. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-01

Boston Dynamics has released a video of its latest autonomous humanoid robot, Atlas, which can now perform tasks independently with zero human intervention. In this new demonstration, Atlas efficiently completes a sequence of physical tasks typically required in industrial settings. Moving engine covers between containers and skillfully maneuvering a mobile sequencing dolly, the robot simulates factory work, marking a significant milestone in autonomous robotics. The video has garnered mixed reactions on social media, with some users expressing fascination and others finding Atlas’s movements “creepy.” In particular, viewers remarked on Atlas’s impressive flexibility; in one scene, it rises by planting its feet behind its head, demonstrating both strength and precision in reorienting its spinal column to stand upright. This seemingly lifelike flexibility has added to the sense of awe and trepidation surrounding Boston Dynamics’ latest robot. Atlas’s advancements come on the heels of Tesla’s new Optimus humanoid robot, which was showcased earlier this month by CEO Elon Musk. During the unveiling, Optimus models mingled with guests and even pulled pints, impressing onlookers with their conversational abilities, though they were controlled remotely by humans. Experts have suggested that fully autonomous humanoid robots, such as Optimus, may take another decade before they are fully integrated and functional within society. As Atlas demonstrates its capabilities in controlled environments, Boston Dynamics has clearly taken a step forward in the field of autonomous robotics. While fully autonomous robots functioning in public spaces may still be years away, Boston Dynamics’ latest advancements suggest a promising and potentially transformative future for robotics in industry and beyond. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-01

In the office of Rachel Reeves, the new Chancellor, hangs a portrait of Ellen Wilkinson, a bold socialist and one of the founders of the Communist Party of Great Britain. Known as “Red Ellen,” Wilkinson’s legacy as a pioneering Labour education minister and a woman of unyielding political resolve has become an apparent source of inspiration for Reeves as she presented her inaugural Budget in the House of Commons. This act of homage is telling: Reeves recently replaced a portrait of former Chancellor Nigel Lawson with Wilkinson’s likeness in her office at No. 11, a detail revealed in a Treasury photograph the night before her first Budget speech. Wilkinson’s life is a study in defiance and transformation, a theme that resonates with Reeves’s potential aspirations for Labour’s tenure. Ellen Wilkinson read history at the University of Manchester beginning in 1910, a time when higher education was still a rarity for women. Just four years earlier, Christabel Pankhurst had graduated as Manchester’s first-ever female law graduate. Wilkinson’s time at university marked her deep commitment to the labor movement and the women’s movement, initially through the university’s Fabian Society branch and later as a trade union organizer. During her university years, she became romantically involved with Walton Newbold, who later became the UK’s first Communist MP. Though the relationship eventually ended, her passion for political activism only grew. Wilkinson’s fervor for social justice sometimes came at a personal cost. She famously recounted that she sacrificed a First in her degree, receiving instead a 2:1, as she devoted her energy “to a strike raging in Manchester.” Inspired by the 1917 Russian Revolution, she joined members of the Independent Labour Party to co-found the Communist Party of Great Britain in 1920. A year later, she traveled to Moscow to attend a congress, meeting notable communist leaders such as Leon Trotsky and Lenin’s wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya, whose speech deeply influenced Wilkinson. Despite her zeal for revolution, Wilkinson eventually diverged from her Communist Party peers on ideology. She sought a parliamentary seat, running as a Labour candidate in Ashton-under-Lyne in 1923, boldly asserting, “We shall have only one class in this country: the working class.” Though unsuccessful, her second attempt in 1924 secured her a seat as MP for Middlesbrough East, where her active role in Labour continued despite having to resign from the Communist Party due to Labour’s policy against dual membership. Wilkinson’s legacy encapsulates the ideological struggle within Labour, balancing the push for socialism with a more centrist approach, a tension still evident in contemporary party dynamics. Her story embodies a balance of unwavering socialist principles with the pragmatism needed to navigate political structures, a reflection of Labour’s own internal debates that may continue under Keir Starmer’s leadership. For Reeves, Wilkinson’s portrait is more than decoration; it represents a figure she has long admired. In her 2019 book *Women of Westminster: The MPs Who Changed Politics*, Reeves praised Wilkinson’s “defiance, determination, and courage” in breaking into a male-dominated political sphere. With Wilkinson’s portrait now hanging in her office, Reeves’s choice signals a tribute to socialist ideals and the courage to confront entrenched norms. Whether Reeves, as Chancellor, will follow in the steps of Red Ellen, challenging the establishment with a similar revolutionary zeal, or pursue a more tempered approach remains to be seen. Her tenure may ultimately reveal whether she aligns herself with Wilkinson’s vision or if her ambitions, like her decor, will favor a softer tone. Based on a report by the Daily Telegraph 2024-11-01

During his campaign, former President Donald Trump has hinted at a potential government overhaul, proposing roles for controversial figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Elon Musk if he secures the presidency again. While the conservative “Project 2025” outlines a framework for a second Trump administration, Trump himself has expressed ideas that go beyond this, especially in the areas of health and government restructuring. Trump has discussed giving Kennedy a free hand to reform health safety systems. At a rally in Madison Square Garden, Trump declared, “I’m going to let him go wild on the food. I’m going to let him go wild on the medicines.” Kennedy has campaigned on a “Make America Healthy Again” platform, emphasizing regenerative agriculture, toxin-free environments, and natural health practices. However, his stance has raised questions due to his history with conspiracy theories, including his suggestion that chemicals in water could affect gender identity and a past comment equating vaccine mandates to the persecution seen in Nazi Germany. On Monday, Kennedy mentioned that Trump has assured him control over key public health agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Department of Agriculture (USDA). “The key that I think I’m – you know, that President Trump has promised me is – is control of the public health agencies,” Kennedy stated. The exact nature of Trump’s plans for Kennedy remains unconfirmed, but CNN reporter Meg Tirrell highlights the public health community’s concerns, noting that Kennedy’s platform conspicuously avoids the topic of vaccines, despite his past anti-vaccine advocacy. His criticism of vaccines has evolved in recent campaigns, but the skepticism he and Trump share on this issue remains a point of contention. Elon Musk, another prominent figure Trump has proposed to involve in his administration, would be tasked with a radical restructuring of the federal government. Musk has suggested that the federal bureaucracy should be completely rethought, saying, “Let’s start from scratch.” This would involve slashing government spending, possibly through the use of artificial intelligence, and restructuring government efficiency, with Musk humorously suggesting a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), echoing his cryptocurrency interests. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, however, criticized Musk’s proposal to cut $2 trillion from government spending, pointing out, “Only 15% of the federal budget is for payroll. So even if you took every single person working for the federal government out, you couldn’t save anything like $2 trillion.” He added that achieving such cuts would require reductions to Social Security and Medicare—areas Trump has pledged to protect. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Trump ally, recently alluded to another ambitious goal: a “massive” overhaul of the health care system, potentially eliminating the Affordable Care Act (ACA), popularly known as “Obamacare.” At a recent event in Pennsylvania, Johnson confirmed, “No Obamacare,” to cheers from the crowd. Trump himself has yet to reveal a detailed alternative, though he claimed to have “concepts” of a plan. Although he failed to repeal the ACA in his previous term, the notion of reshaping health care remains a priority for his administration. Despite these grand proposals, Trump and his allies would likely encounter significant resistance within the Senate and legal constraints within the Constitution. Although the president holds some authority over the federal workforce, a sweeping restructuring, especially on the scale Musk envisions, would require legislative approval. In Kennedy’s case, Senate confirmation would be necessary if he were nominated to lead HHS. Yet, without specifics in place to match the ideas in Project 2025, it’s uncertain how feasible these drastic changes would be. In conclusion, Trump’s vision of a government overhaul would give RFK Jr. and Musk powerful roles that could radically reshape health policies and government operations. However, the ambitious nature of these plans faces substantial legal and political obstacles that could restrict their implementation if he were to return to the White House. Based on a report by CNN 2024-11-01

There exists an unspoken rule in British public discourse: when an attack occurs with potential links to jihadism or immigration, the public often remains uninformed of a possible motive, at least until withholding this information becomes impractical. This process follows predictable steps. Typically, those who do attempt to discuss likely motives are advised to avoid prejudicing any trial. Public officials often insist that there will be an appropriate time and place to discuss these issues – though, in practice, that opportunity may never arise. Incidents like the murder of Drummer Lee Rigby, the assassination of Sir David Amess, the Ariana Grande concert bombing, and more recently, the Taylor Swift dance class massacre, showcase this pattern. These tragic events reveal a recurring reluctance to fully address the motives behind certain attacks until public curiosity grows too intense to ignore. For now, such violent attacks remain rare in the UK. It is only natural that, alongside outrage, the public might feel curious about how such incidents occur. Yet, when it came to the Southport attack, information from law enforcement seemed notably sparse. This led some to speculate about the motive behind the crime. Had the assailant been a far-right extremist with slogans referencing figures like Oswald Mosley, for instance, the details may have come to light immediately. Or if the attacker had declared, "All Taylor Swift fans must be killed," this, too, would likely have been shared openly. Instead, there was silence. Eventually, a vague statement surfaced on Sky News and other major media outlets, disclosing that the suspect was from Cardiff. This information, rather than satisfying public curiosity, seemed almost incongruous. As some wondered, would any presume a “typical Welshman” behind the crime? Further details then emerged, identifying the suspect as of Rwandan descent, a revelation that momentarily redirected attention. For some, this discovery was sufficient to dismiss any significant implications about the suspect's background. Others pointed to Rwanda’s predominantly Christian demographics and argued that, given the suspect was a child of immigrants rather than a recent arrival, his heritage bore little relevance. The prevalent belief in the multicultural state posits that once someone settles in Britain, they become “as British as roast beef,” regardless of origins. The release of the suspect's name, 18-year-old Axel Rudakubana, brought a new wave of responses. Media outlets strategically displayed images of Rudakubana from his school years, a conscious effort to present him as a young person, though not as young as his victims. As public frustration boiled over, protests erupted in multiple cities, and some individuals resorted to violence, targeting police vehicles, a station, a mosque, and even a hotel housing illegal immigrants. While some perpetrators faced imprisonment for these violent acts, others found themselves arrested simply for speculating online about the attacker or sharing what was deemed “false news,” including suggestions that the attacker might be Muslim. Only this week did further details about the case surface, indicating that the suspect possessed al Qaeda training materials and had attempted to create the deadly toxin ricin. These are significant revelations, vital for Rudakubana’s trial. Yet, the authorities likely became aware of these details early on, possibly within hours of searching Rudakubana’s home. Now, individuals who were criticized for allegedly spreading “fake news” about the attacker’s motives appear to have, in part, anticipated the truth. Like many other people I look forward very much to the day when we get to find out where the truth really lies. Based on a report by the Spectator 2024-11-01

Ofcom has imposed a £100,000 fine on GB News, citing “serious and repeated” violations of impartiality rules after the channel gave then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak what it described as a “mostly uncontested platform” during a broadcast. The program, which aired on February 12, allowed Sunak an hour-long Q&A with a live audience, with Ofcom concluding that the episode failed to present an “appropriately wide range of significant viewpoints” and did not preserve “due impartiality.” While Ofcom issued the fine, it will defer enforcing payment until the conclusion of a judicial review that GB News has initiated to challenge the regulator’s original ruling. Ofcom is set to defend its decision, asserting the severity of the impartiality breaches as justification for the penalty. Additionally, the regulator has ordered GB News to broadcast a public statement of its findings, the timing and format of which will be at Ofcom’s discretion. GB News chief executive Angelos Frangopoulos responded to the fine by calling it a “direct attack on free speech and journalism in the United Kingdom.” He described the sanction as “unnecessary, unfair and unlawful,” emphasizing that the High Court has allowed GB News to seek judicial review to contest Ofcom’s original ruling. “The plan to sanction GB News flies in the face of Ofcom’s duty to act fairly, lawfully and proportionately to safeguard free speech, particularly political speech and on matters of public interest,” Frangopoulos added. He highlighted the role of The People’s Forum, where Sunak was interviewed, as an essential platform for public engagement, asserting that GB News took steps to maintain impartiality in line with the Broadcasting Code. “It was designed to allow members of the public to put their own questions directly to leading politicians,” he stated, further emphasizing the network’s commitment to operating within regulatory boundaries. Frangopoulos underscored the station’s belief in freedom of expression, arguing that Ofcom has a responsibility to apply its rules fairly. “At the People’s Channel we will continue to fearlessly champion freedom; for our viewers, for our listeners, and for everyone in the United Kingdom,” he said, underscoring what he sees as the network’s unique role in the UK media landscape. The People’s Forum episode, which featured Sunak, was intended to be the first in a series offering public access to political figures, according to GB News. The network indicated that Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer had been invited to participate in a similar program, though his appearance did not materialize after Ofcom initiated its investigation. Ofcom’s review found that due impartiality requirements were unmet, as an adequate range of perspectives was not presented nor addressed in other programs. As the legal challenge unfolds, the Ofcom ruling and the subsequent response from GB News will likely spark broader discussions about media impartiality, freedom of expression, and the responsibilities of broadcasters under UK law. Based on a report by Press Gazette 2024-11-01

The United States recently recorded its first instance of bird flu in a pig, raising concerns over the potential for the virus to become a human threat. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced that the infection was found at a small, mixed-animal farm in Crook County, Oregon, a location where different species share water and shelter. Initial testing detected bird flu in poultry at the farm, and further tests this week confirmed that one of the farm's five pigs had also contracted the virus. In response, officials quarantined the farm, and all five pigs were euthanized to allow for more comprehensive testing. The farm operates outside of the commercial supply chain, so the USDA assured the public that the nation’s pork remains safe. However, this case has underscored the potential for bird flu to make a “species jump,” sparking discussions about whether the virus might eventually pose a more significant risk to humans. Jennifer Nuzzo, a pandemic researcher at Brown University, highlighted the concerns this development raises. Pigs are known carriers of various influenza viruses and can play a role in enabling bird viruses to adapt to human hosts. "Pigs can be infected with multiple types of flu, and the animals can play a role in making bird viruses better adapted to humans," Nuzzo explained. Reflecting on past outbreaks, she noted that the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic had swine origins, reinforcing the importance of vigilance. “If we’re trying to stay ahead of this virus and prevent it from becoming a threat to the broader public, knowing if it’s in pigs is crucial,” Nuzzo emphasized. Currently, the USDA has conducted genetic analyses on the infected farm’s poultry and has not found mutations that would suggest an increased likelihood of the virus adapting to humans. This reassures officials that the immediate risk to the public remains low. However, bird flu’s continued spread in the U.S. is a concern. This strain, classified as Type A H5N1, has become widespread among wild birds, poultry, cattle, and several other animals, increasing the potential for human exposure. Troy Sutton, a flu researcher at Penn State, weighed in on the implications of the Oregon case, noting that while it's noteworthy, it does not necessarily indicate a higher level of threat. "It isn’t a one-to-one relationship, where pigs get infected with viruses and they make pandemics,” Sutton clarified. Although the virus has affected many species, he said that a significant cause for concern would arise if the virus started spreading more broadly among pigs and led to human infections. “If the virus starts spreading more widely among pigs and if there are ensuing human infections, then we’re going to be more concerned,” he added. So far in 2024, nearly 40 human cases of bird flu have been reported across California, Colorado, Washington, Michigan, Texas, and Missouri. Fortunately, the reported symptoms have mostly been mild, with the most common being eye redness. All but one of those affected had direct contact with infected animals, suggesting that transmission between humans is not yet a concern. Based on a report by AFP 2024-11-01

Off topic trolling nonsense removed

Just days before Election Day, Vice President Kamala Harris sought to distance herself from President Joe Biden’s remarks that seemingly branded Donald Trump’s supporters as “garbage.” The comment, which sparked a swift backlash, left some Democrats privately frustrated with Biden for igniting a political controversy at such a critical time. "Harris on Biden's "garbage" comment: "I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for..." Biden’s comment and the subsequent fallout have further fueled tensions within the Democratic Party, with some insiders expressing concern over the president’s remarks potentially alienating undecided voters at a crucial moment. In the final stretch of the campaign, Harris’s efforts to publicly distance herself from Biden’s words reflect a strategic move to mitigate any potential damage, reaffirming her commitment to serving all Americans without partisan bias. Based on a report by CNN 2024-10-31

Spain is grappling with its deadliest flood disaster in decades as intense rainfall has claimed at least 95 lives, with many more people still missing. The catastrophic floods, which began on Tuesday, have ravaged the eastern province of Valencia and beyond, submerging communities and leaving a path of destruction. The torrential rains triggered flash floods that overwhelmed the region, destroying bridges and buildings and forcing many people to cling to trees or seek refuge on rooftops. As President Pedro Sánchez declared three days of national mourning, the severe weather continued, further complicating rescue efforts. Expressing deep sorrow for the victims, Sánchez addressed the nation on Wednesday, saying, “The whole of Spain weeps with you… we won’t abandon you.” Officials fear the death toll may rise as the number of missing persons remains high. Of the 95 deaths confirmed so far, 92 occurred in Valencia, two in the neighboring region of Castilla-La Mancha, and one in Málaga. The latter involved a 71-year-old British man who passed away in the hospital after being rescued. The disaster has become Spain’s deadliest flooding event since 1973 when catastrophic floods claimed at least 150 lives in the country’s southeast. In Horno de Alcedo, just outside Valencia, Mayor Consuelo Tarazon described how floodwaters rose by over a meter in a matter of minutes. “The currents were so quick – and we called the emergency services who started rescuing some people who had water up to their necks,” Tarazon shared with *BBC Newshour*. Spain has deployed over 1,000 troops to assist with ongoing rescue efforts, although many areas remain cut off due to flooded roads, power outages, and disrupted communication lines. The European Union responded quickly to Spain's crisis, with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen activating the Copernicus satellite system to help coordinate rescue teams. Neighboring European countries have also offered additional support. Spanish Defense Minister Margarita Robles called the floods "an unprecedented phenomenon" earlier on Wednesday, acknowledging that while various factors contribute to flooding, the intensifying effects of climate change make extreme rainfall more likely. As Spain faces this tragic loss and destruction, the country is bracing for a challenging recovery effort in the weeks and months ahead. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-10-31