Social Media

In an unexpected moment during a rally in Asheboro, North Carolina, former President Donald Trump stepped out of a bulletproof enclosure set up by the Secret Service to personally attend to a supporter who had fallen ill due to the intense heat. The rally, which marked Trump's first outdoor event since the July 13 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, featured heightened security measures, including a ballistics-glass panel at the podium and additional protective barriers flanking the former president's back and sides. The incident occurred mid-speech when Trump, 78, was interrupted by calls for medical assistance from the crowd. “What’s wrong?” Trump asked, directing his attention toward the disturbance. Upon realizing that a rally-goer required medical attention, Trump immediately requested assistance, saying, “A doctor, please,” and acknowledging the challenging conditions by noting, “It is very hot here.” As medical personnel moved to help a white-haired woman who had collapsed in the stands, Trump did something that surprised many—he left the safety of the bulletproof enclosure to offer the woman a comforting embrace. The moment was brief, but it was enough to prompt a swift response from the Secret Service, who quickly surrounded Trump as he moved toward the crowd, ensuring his protection as he broke protocol to connect with his supporter. Returning to the podium, Trump reflected on the dedication of his followers. “You know, they come two days, three days early, and it’s a lot. It’s a lot of stress,” he remarked, acknowledging the effort and devotion of those who attend his rallies. This rally was particularly significant given the recent assassination attempt, which had reportedly led the Secret Service to advise Trump against holding outdoor events. Despite the concerns, Trump’s affinity for open-air rallies remains strong, as they have become a hallmark of his presidential campaigns, drawing large crowds and allowing for a direct connection with his supporters. The event underscored the tension between ensuring the safety of a former president and maintaining the intimate, personal connection that Trump’s rallies are known for. As he continues to campaign, the balance between security and accessibility will likely remain a focal point for both Trump and his security team. Credit: NYP 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Colin Cowan, the brother of a Jewish man murdered during the brutal October 7 attacks by Hamas, has leveled serious accusations of anti-Semitism against the Scottish National Party (SNP) following a recent decision by the Scottish government to suspend meetings with Israeli diplomats. Cowan, whose brother, Bernard Cowan, was killed by Hamas militants at his home in Kibbutz Sufa in southern Israel, expressed profound disappointment and outrage over the SNP's actions. He asserted that there was "no doubt" in his mind that the suspension was driven by anti-Semitic motives. The Scottish government's announcement on Monday that ministers would halt all diplomatic talks with Israel unless certain demands were met has sparked significant controversy. Colin Cowan accused Scotland’s First Minister, Humza Yousaf, of exploiting his grieving mother for a "photo opportunity" during a memorial service for the October 7 victims, where Yousaf was photographed embracing Mrs. Cowan. Cowan described this gesture as an "act of Jew-washing," pointing to what he perceives as a "blatant double standard" in the SNP's diplomatic conduct, particularly in comparison to the treatment of Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Erdoğan's government has faced international criticism for its harsh crackdown on the Kurdish community and severe restrictions on judicial independence, freedom of speech, and women's rights in Turkey. Thousands of individuals have been prosecuted and sentenced for the crime of insulting the president. Despite these human rights concerns, Yousaf previously invited Erdoğan to Scotland, a move that has intensified Cowan's belief that the SNP's recent actions against Israel are rooted in anti-Semitism. Bernard Cowan was one of over 1,200 people killed in the surprise Hamas attack on October 7, which also saw around 250 hostages seized, according to Israeli officials. More than 100 hostages remain in captivity. In the aftermath of his brother's death, Colin Cowan has been vocal in his criticism of the SNP, particularly following the apology issued by Angus Robertson, Scotland's External Affairs Secretary, after he met with a senior Israeli diplomat earlier this month. Robertson was compelled to apologize after SNP MPs, MSPs, and party members expressed anger over the meeting, arguing that it undermined the party's condemnation of Israel’s actions in Gaza and its support for a separate Palestinian state. Some even called for Robertson's dismissal. In his apology, Robertson acknowledged that his decision to meet with Daniela Grudsky, Israel's deputy ambassador, was mistakenly interpreted by many as a normalization of relations between Scotland and Israel. He clarified that no further meetings with Israeli officials would occur "until such time as real progress has been made towards peace, unimpeded access to humanitarian assistance is provided, and Israel cooperates fully with its international obligations on the investigation of genocide and war crimes." Despite this, SNP ministers will continue to engage with Palestinian officials. First Minister John Swinney defended the decision, stating that Israel's conduct left "no further dialogue" possible. In an article published in The Herald, Colin Cowan criticized Yousaf's invitation to President Erdoğan during the COP28 summit in December, particularly given Erdoğan’s past statements labeling Israel as a "terror state" and Hamas as a "liberation group." Cowan also condemned the Scottish Government's decision to allocate £250,000 of taxpayers' money to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNWRA), an organization he claimed had "directly supported the massacre on October 7 which killed my brother." Cowan's grievances extend beyond these specific incidents, as he questions the SNP's broader stance towards Israel, asking, "What is so objectionable about the world’s only Jewish state that leads so many to criticize it above that of any other country? For me, as with many in Scotland’s Jewish communities, there is no doubt about the answer." He firmly believes that anti-Semitism is at the root of the SNP's actions and lamented that the issue was "the worst it's ever been" in Scotland during his lifetime. Cowan revealed that his nephew, Bernard's son, has even asked him if he would consider moving to Israel due to the growing "anti-Jew hatred" in Scotland. "That may seem absurd, that Scottish Jews would consider leaving Scotland for Israel amid safety fears, but I assure you that it’s a conversation taking place in Jewish communities across our country," he added. The Scottish Council of Jewish Communities (SCoJeC) also weighed in on the issue, emphasizing that the Scottish Government "cannot in conscience deny the right of the victims to prevent the promised repetition of the atrocities of Oct 7." SCoJeC stressed that if the Scottish Government aspires to contribute to a resolution of the long-running Israeli-Palestinian conflict and supports a two-state solution, it must engage with both parties. A Scottish Government spokesperson responded to Cowan’s criticisms by expressing the First Minister's deepest condolences for Cowan’s loss. The spokesperson added that Yousaf would be grateful for the opportunity to meet with Cowan and his family. The spokesperson reiterated the Scottish Government's condemnation of Hamas' attacks on October 7 and expressed support for an immediate ceasefire and a two-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians can live in peace. Additionally, they confirmed that Swinney had held talks with SCoJeC and assured that the Scottish Government takes issues of anti-Semitism "extremely seriously." Humza Yousaf himself also responded to the controversy, stating, "My thoughts continue to be with families who are suffering due to the horrific terror attack by Hamas on October 7th, including the Cowan family, and families in Gaza who have been devastated by Israel’s horrendous actions, resulting in tens of thousands of innocent people being killed." Yousaf defended his participation in the October memorial service, where he embraced Cowan's mother, saying, "I am proud of my lifelong campaigning against hatred in all of its forms, and believe that Islamophobia and anti-Semitism are two sides of the same coin." However, Yousaf stood by the Scottish Government's decision to suspend diplomatic relations with Israel, insisting that "there are not normal diplomatic relationships with the government of Israel until they comply with their international obligations and cease killing civilians with impunity." This stance has further fueled the debate over the SNP's approach to Israel and the underlying reasons for the recent diplomatic freeze. As tensions continue to rise, the accusations of anti-Semitism have added a complex and emotionally charged dimension to the already contentious issue of Scotland's foreign policy towards Israel. Credit: The Times 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A disturbing new report reveals that the Biden-Harris administration has lost track of more than 320,000 migrant children who crossed the U.S. border unaccompanied by parents. The Homeland Security Inspector General’s report, released on Monday, warns that these children, placed with "qualified sponsors" within the U.S., may now be at risk of sex trafficking, forced labor, and other forms of exploitation. As of May 2024, 291,000 of these children, who arrived in the U.S. as unaccompanied minors, were released without a scheduled immigration court date, making it nearly impossible to monitor their whereabouts. An additional 32,000 children, who were given hearing dates upon release by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), also failed to appear in court, as highlighted in the 14-page report covering the period from October 2018 to September 2023. Federal whistleblower Tara Rodas, who was initially recruited to assist the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with the surge of migrant children in 2021, expressed grave concerns about the situation. Rodas recounted her shock upon realizing that she was, in fact, placing these vulnerable children into the hands of traffickers and other dangerous individuals. "At the very beginning of the Biden administration, they stripped all the vetting out of the process," she stated, highlighting cases where sponsors, claiming to be relatives, were actually exploiting the children. In one particularly troubling case, Rodas encountered a 16-year-old girl whose sponsor falsely claimed to be her older brother. The girl appeared drugged, and her sponsor's social media posts suggested she was being exploited. Concerns are further heightened by reports that some non-family sponsors are hosting multiple migrant children, which Rodas describes as a major "red flag." In 2023 alone, 344 unaccompanied children were found living with non-family sponsors who were each responsible for at least three children. Dr. Jason Piccolo, a retired federal agent who previously exposed the government's release of children to potential criminals, described the situation as "deeply concerning." He called for immediate reforms, stating, "There needs to be an immediate standard operating procedure to track the status and whereabouts of every single unaccompanied migrant child across all involved agencies." The report also highlighted cases where children, released by the federal government, ended up working in exploitative conditions in slaughterhouses and factories. Rodas and other critics argue that a systemic failure within the government has allowed this situation to unfold. In one tragic instance, an MS-13 gang member, released into the U.S. as a minor, was accused of brutally raping and murdering Kayla Hamilton, a young autistic woman in Maryland, in July 2022. Hamilton's mother, Tammy Nobles, has blamed the federal government for failing to properly vet the alleged killer, noting that a simple check with El Salvadoran authorities would have revealed his gang affiliations. Nobles testified before Congress, criticizing HHS for its "operational neglect" and alleging that this neglect contributed to her daughter's death. She further condemned the agency for allowing the MS-13 member to live unsupervised with another illegal immigrant in a trailer park. Despite the alarming findings, the government watchdog report noted that only one of eight audited ICE offices made any attempts to locate the missing children. Rodas and others continue to raise the alarm, calling for urgent action to protect these vulnerable minors from further harm. Credit: NYP 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Lancashire Police have euthanized an XL bully dog after it fatally attacked its owner, David Daintree, 53, in Accrington. The tragic incident occurred at a residence on Ashley Court, where police were called around 9:30 PM on Tuesday following reports of a dog attack. Upon arrival, officers found Mr. Daintree deceased and determined that the dog, still presenting a significant threat, needed to be destroyed to prevent further harm. Supt Marie Jackson expressed her condolences, stating, “This is a heartbreaking event, and our thoughts are with the victim’s family. We are thoroughly investigating the circumstances surrounding this incident and encourage anyone with relevant information to come forward.” Police have increased their presence in the area to conduct inquiries and address any concerns from the community. Specially trained officers are providing support to Mr. Daintree’s family during this difficult time. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a chilling case that has haunted Australia for decades, a cult member who brutally killed her two-year-old daughter over an inability to properly complete chores has been sentenced to nine years in prison. The tragic story of Tillie Craig, who vanished from a remote religious commune in 1987, has only recently come to light, leading to justice for a crime long buried by the secrecy of a cult. Tillie Craig disappeared from the Ministry of God farm in New South Wales (NSW) in 1987, igniting a desperate, decades-long search by her father, Gerard Stanhope, who had been told his daughter was adopted. The heartbreaking reality was far more sinister. Tillie had been beaten to death with a plastic pipe by her own mother, Ellen Rachel Craig, when she was just two years old. Her small body was then allegedly cremated by the cult’s leader, her ashes scattered across the commune, erasing nearly all traces of her existence. Ellen Craig, now 62, was charged with her daughter’s murder in 2022 after a tip-off to police finally brought the truth to light. She later pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter. When sentencing Craig on Wednesday, Justice Natalie Adams of the NSW Supreme Court expressed the profound tragedy of the case, stating that to call Tillie’s death a tragedy would be "a gross understatement." Justice Adams emphasized the grave betrayal inherent in the act, noting that Tillie "died at the hands of someone whose role it was to protect her." The grim details of Tillie’s last moments were recounted in court, revealing a disturbing culture of discipline within the commune. According to the agreed facts, children at the Ministry of God farm were required to perform chores regardless of their age. Punishment for perceived failings was harsh, often involving a piece of black pipe. On July 7, 1987, Tillie had been sweeping when her mother, unhappy with the quality of the work, beat her to death. Craig, then 25 years old, later brought her lifeless daughter inside, uttering in horror, "She’s stopped breathing" and "Oh no, no she’s gone." The court heard that after the brutal beating, Craig laid Tillie in a bathtub and waited for the cult’s leader, known as Alexander Wilon or "Papa," to return. When he did, Wilon prayed for the resurrection of the little girl, a futile and macabre ritual. Wilon then allegedly cremated Tillie’s body and scattered her ashes, forbidding the other cult members from ever speaking of what had happened. This act of silencing, combined with the destruction of evidence, ensured that the truth remained hidden for more than three decades. Wilon was later charged with being an accessory to murder, along with separate charges related to sexual assault allegations. However, due to his terminal illness, he has been declared unfit to stand trial, escaping legal accountability for his role in Tillie’s death. Following Tillie’s murder, Ellen Craig was expelled from the cult by November 1987. She fled to her home country of New Zealand, where she lived under several aliases for more than 30 years. Her past finally caught up with her in 2021 when she was arrested and extradited to Australia to face justice for her crime. During her sentencing, a segment of a letter written by Craig was read aloud in court, offering a glimpse into her remorse. In the letter, Craig apologized for her actions, stating, "something happened" to her as a mother while living at the farm. She expressed deep regret, writing, "My actions were horrible, terrible, horrific. I will never forgive myself for what I have done." Craig also acknowledged her guilt and the need for accountability, adding that she wanted "justice" for her daughter and was "at peace" with her imprisonment. For Tillie’s father, Gerard Stanhope, the sentencing marked the end of a long, painful chapter of uncertainty and grief. In a victim impact statement read to the court, Stanhope described the torment of not knowing his daughter’s fate for so many years. "I spent years... waking up every day with the hope in my heart that I would find her, and going to bed devastated that I was unable to do so," he recalled. The devastating truth—that his daughter had been dead all along—only came to light more than 30 years later, when Craig was arrested. The court’s decision will see Ellen Craig eligible for parole after six years in custody, in November 2027. While the legal proceedings have concluded, the sorrow and horror of Tillie’s story remain, a stark reminder of the destructive power of cults and the unimaginable suffering they can inflict on the innocent. Credit: BBC 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Troll post and personal attack removed. Please keep to the topic @beautifulthailand99 A reported misinformation post also removed

A post making false claims has been removed. From the landing page: "Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source." An off topic video has also been removed along with a trolling meme. The topic here is: The Democratic Convention and the Gaza Debate: Unity Under Threat

Divers searching the wreckage of a superyacht that sank off the coast of Sicily have found the bodies of five of the six missing passengers. The tragic discovery comes after days of intense search efforts following the sinking of the yacht, known as the Bayesian, on Monday. The yacht was carrying 22 people when it capsized and sank in freak weather conditions. The Italian Coastguard has not yet formally identified the bodies recovered from the wreck, but the search has focused on locating four Britons and two Americans who were aboard the yacht. Among those missing are Mike Lynch, the UK tech entrepreneur whose wife owns the Bayesian yacht, his daughter Hannah Lynch, Jonathan Bloomer, the chairman of Morgan Stanley Bank International, and his wife Judy Bloomer. The first two bodies were brought ashore at Porticello harbor on Wednesday afternoon, with two more bodies recovered later that evening before the search was paused as night fell. The search for the remaining missing passenger continues. The Bayesian sank in the early hours of Monday, about 700 meters off the coast of Sicily. It is believed that the vessel was struck by a waterspout—a tornado over the water—which caused it to capsize and sink to a depth of 50 meters (164 feet) on the seabed. The violent weather event caught the yacht and its passengers by surprise, leading to the tragic incident that has now claimed multiple lives. Throughout Wednesday, a steady stream of boats ferried divers to and from the search site as the recovery operation continued. The small quayside at Porticello was lined with emergency services personnel as the bodies of the missing were returned to shore. One body bag was seen being placed in the back of an ambulance before the sound of sirens filled the harbor as the vehicle, escorted by two police cars, departed from the port. Italian authorities have not yet identified the recovered bodies, despite media reports speculating on the identities of the victims. This delay is likely due to the ongoing search for the remaining passenger, as well as the legal requirement in Italy for the deceased to be formally identified by a family member or someone close to the victims before the deaths can be officially certified. Salvatore Cocina, the head of Sicily's civil protection agency, emphasized that while an investigation into the incident would take place, the immediate priority was to locate everyone who was on board the Bayesian vessel. The yacht, which was 56 meters long and flying a British flag, was carrying 10 crew members and 12 passengers when it sank. Of the 22 people on board, 15 survived, including a British mother who described holding her baby girl above the surface of the sea to save her from drowning. The first body to be recovered from the wreck was that of the yacht's chef, Recaldo Thomas, a Canadian-Antiguan national. His body was found on Monday, shortly after the incident. Gareth Williams, a friend of Mr. Thomas, spoke to the BBC, sharing that he had known the chef for 30 years as they had grown up together in Antigua, where Mr. Thomas lived during yachting’s off-season. The passengers aboard the Bayesian were guests of Mike Lynch, the founder of the software giant Autonomy. The group was reportedly on the yacht to celebrate Lynch's acquittal in a massive U.S. fraud case. In June, Lynch was acquitted of multiple fraud charges related to the $11 billion (£8.6 billion) sale of Autonomy to U.S. computing giant Hewlett-Packard in 2011. In addition to the recovery efforts, inspections of the yacht's internal hull were conducted on Wednesday morning. A team of four British inspectors from the Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) arrived in Sicily to assist with the investigation. The depth of the wreckage has posed significant challenges to the rescue teams, as the yacht is lying on its side at the bottom of the seabed, with its access points blocked by debris. Italian rescue services have reported that the team of specialist divers has been hampered by these difficult conditions. The wreck is located at a depth where ambient light is minimal, making the situation even more perilous for the divers. Professional diver Andy Goddard, speaking before the bodies were recovered, described the conditions as "pretty dark," with limited visibility and debris floating around, creating an environment akin to being in a washing machine. "It's really dangerous for the diver," he told BBC Radio 5 Live. As the search continues for the final missing passenger, the tragedy has cast a somber shadow over the region. The investigation into the cause of the accident is expected to take time, with authorities focusing on ensuring that all those affected by the disaster are accounted for. The loss of life has been deeply felt by those who knew the victims and by the wider community, as the full impact of this maritime tragedy becomes apparent. Credit: BBC 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

On a tense night in Chicago, as anti-Israel protesters clashed with police officers outside the Israeli consulate, which is located just a couple of miles from the United Center, where the Democratic National Convention was taking place. The demonstrators, who were chanting "Free, free Palestine" and waving Palestinian flags, attempted to break through a police line formed by officers in riot gear outside the building housing the consulate. Videos captured the chaotic scene as police officers were seen shoving demonstrators, with some being tackled to the ground before being taken into custody. The night saw at least eight arrests. Adding to the tension, some protesters set fire to an American flag in the middle of the street, an act that further inflamed the situation. As dusk fell, the protesters shifted their chants to, "CPD, go home or we will bring the war home!" indicating their readiness for a continued standoff with law enforcement. One speaker, amplifying the urgency and anger of the crowd, shouted into a microphone, "Make them feel what Gaza feels! Make the DNC feel what Gaza feels! This f–king empire needs to burn to the ground!" The intensity of the emotions and rhetoric highlighted the depth of the protesters' grievances, particularly regarding the situation in Gaza. The Chicago Police Department issued an order to disperse the crowd around 8:30 p.m. local time. However, the protests had already made their mark, both in the physical scuffles with police and the symbolic acts, such as the flag burning. Among the protesters was Mike Lehman, a 50-year-old Chicago resident, who held a sign that read, "make Israel pay all its war-murder costs now." Lehman expressed his desire for the Democratic Party to take a stronger stance against Israel, reflecting the sentiments of many who had gathered that evening. The protests coincided with the second night of the Democratic National Convention, during which several prominent Democrats, including Senators Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders, as well as former President Barack Obama, were slated to speak. The proximity of the protests to such a significant political event underscored the broader national and international implications of the unrest. The Israeli consulate in Chicago has been a focal point for demonstrations since the outbreak of war in Gaza on October 7. The consulate is located in a building connected to the Ogilvie Transportation Center, a key hub for commuters. On Tuesday, law enforcement had closed most of the entrances to the consulate, leaving only one entrance open to travelers, where armed officers were stationed. The Associated Press reported that many of the shops within the building were also closed in anticipation of potential unrest. Earlier in the day, a group of Israel supporters, including family members of hostages kidnapped by Hamas, gathered near the consulate at an art installation. They called for continued U.S. military support for Israel and urged action to free those still held captive by the militants. This gathering provided a stark contrast to the later clashes, illustrating the deep divisions within the community regarding the conflict. While pro-Palestinian protesters have been given an array of accommodations by the city, the Jewish protesters are only able to gather due to the donation of a private lot by an owner for their use. Even as pro-Palestinian protesters veered off approved routes and tore down security fencing, it will be the Jewish protesters who will reportedly remain confined to this private lot under the watchful eye of the Chicago Police Department. Josh Weiner, co-founder of Chicago Jewish Alliance, confirmed that the group was not granted permits, so all they could do is walk around such approved protests to “make our presence felt.” He added that “pro-Palestine protesters have gotten multiple permits, including a march, which seems to be a little bit weighted on one side.” For Chicagoans like myself, the treatment of the pro-Israel protesters at the DNC could not be more ironic or disturbing. As the Democratic National Convention continued, the protests served as a stark reminder of the ongoing and passionate debate surrounding U.S. policy in the Middle East, particularly regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The clashes in Chicago highlighted the deep divisions and the powerful emotions that the issue evokes on both sides. As the convention progressed, the city remained on high alert, with the potential for further demonstrations and unrest looming large. Credit: NYP 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Former President Donald Trump recently clarified his stance on the federal regulation of abortion pills, and his position has ignited significant controversy among conservatives and anti-abortion activists. In an interview with CBS News, Trump declared that if re-elected, he would not use the 150-year-old Comstock Act to ban the mail delivery of abortion drugs, stating, “The federal government should have nothing to do with this issue.” This statement has been met with strong disapproval from many on the right, who view it as a betrayal of pro-life values. Prominent conservatives have labeled Trump's remarks as "nonsensical" and "cowardly," expressing concerns that his position could weaken support and enthusiasm among right-leaning voters in the upcoming election. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, was particularly vocal, stating, “It is not a pro-life position, it’s not an acceptable position, and it does not provide the contrast on this issue to the degree that we have had in the past between him and Kamala Harris. What President Trump is doing is suppressing his own support.” Trump's relationship with anti-abortion advocates has been complex, despite his role in appointing Supreme Court justices who played a pivotal part in overturning Roe v. Wade. This latest clash over his refusal to endorse a national abortion ban, along with his efforts to soften certain aspects of the GOP platform, has sparked further outrage from conservatives, including his former vice president, Mike Pence. The Trump campaign has yet to respond to the backlash. Meanwhile, abortion opponents have been exploring various legislative and legal strategies to restrict access to abortion pills, with many focusing on the Comstock Act as a potential tool. This law, originating from the 1870s and named after an official who opposed various forms of vice, prohibits the mailing of any "lewd or lascivious material," which includes any substance or instrument that could be used for an abortion. Some conservatives view the Comstock Act as a means of curtailing the distribution of abortion pills without the need for congressional approval. In 2023, Trump's running mate, Ohio Senator JD Vance, joined other members of Congress in urging the Justice Department to utilize the Comstock Act to prosecute those involved in the "reckless distribution of abortion drugs by mail." However, Trump's recent rejection of the Comstock approach has been perceived as hypocritical by many anti-abortion activists. They argue that his stance effectively endorses the actions of doctors and advocacy groups who mail abortion pills into states where they are banned, further complicating the legal landscape. Kristi Hamrick, chief policy strategist with Students for Life of America, criticized Trump's position, stating, “President Trump keeps saying that he wants to be out of the federal business of abortion. So, number one, stop funding it. And, two, end the federal prejudice in favor of this distribution.” Hamrick also warned that Trump's Comstock stance could undermine the GOP's reputation as the party of law and order, emphasizing, “We can’t ignore the rule of law and pick and choose the laws that we want to enforce.” Although the Comstock Act remains on the books, its scope has been significantly narrowed over the years. Lawmakers and judges have limited its application, and in 2022, the Biden administration issued a legal memo arguing that the law does not prohibit the mail delivery of abortion medication unless the sender intends for it to be used illegally. Despite efforts by Democrats in Congress to repeal the law, it continues to be a point of contention in the ongoing debate over abortion access. This is not the first time Trump has clashed with anti-abortion groups since leaving office. He has previously rejected calls for federal restrictions on abortion, blamed anti-abortion activists for electoral losses in 2022 and 2023, and led efforts to modify certain anti-abortion elements of the GOP platform. His recent comments have only deepened the rift between Trump and the anti-abortion movement. Conservatives were also frustrated by Trump's characterization of a recent Supreme Court ruling on abortion pills. The Court declined to roll back access to the pills but did not address the merits of the case, instead sending it back to lower courts for further consideration. Trump’s assertion that abortion pills are "going to be available" and that the Supreme Court had effectively endorsed this status quo further alienated his pro-life base. Lila Rose, founder of the anti-abortion group Live Action, expressed her disappointment with Trump's stance, saying, “Unfortunately, it seems like Trump doesn’t care about the pro-life base anymore. He came out recently and said that he supported access to these deadly abortion drugs, and that is horrific.” While many abortion opponents remain pessimistic about their chances of changing Trump’s mind, some activists are continuing to apply pressure. Students for Life has sent open letters to Trump and is engaging in "a lot of backdoor conversations" with his team. Rose, meanwhile, is lobbying Trump and other candidates to take a stronger pro-life stance, warning that failure to do so could cost them the election. “When Trump is publicly compromising, it’s deeply discouraging to pro-life and pro-family voters, and I think that he’s putting his own election in jeopardy,” Rose said. “Quite frankly, this is a losing strategy.” As the debate over abortion continues to evolve, Trump's latest remarks have only intensified the divisions within the conservative movement. The coming months will reveal whether these internal conflicts will have a lasting impact on the GOP’s electoral prospects and the broader fight over abortion rights in the United States. Credit: Politico 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

President Joe Biden has approved revisions to a classified nuclear strategy document that significantly alters Washington's approach to nuclear deterrence. For the first time, the strategy now prioritizes addressing China's rapidly expanding nuclear arsenal, signaling a major shift in U.S. defense policy. The document, titled "Nuclear Employment Guidance," was updated in March, marking a crucial development in the ongoing redefinition of global nuclear threats. The updates to this strategic document are highly classified, with only a few hard copies distributed to select national security and Pentagon officials. The New York Times reported on these changes, noting that the document is revised approximately every four years. No electronic versions exist, underscoring the sensitive nature of the information contained within. Hints of this strategic pivot were recently evident in public comments by senior Biden administration officials. In June, Pranay Vaddi, the National Security Council's senior director for arms control, disarmament, and nonproliferation, emphasized the need for a strategy that could simultaneously deter Russia, China, and North Korea. Speaking at the annual Arms Control Association meeting, Vaddi underscored the necessity of a multifaceted approach to nuclear deterrence in light of evolving global threats. Earlier this month, Vipin Narang, a former acting assistant secretary of defense for space policy, spoke of the recent updates to nuclear weapons employment guidance. Narang highlighted that the revisions were specifically designed to address the growing challenge posed by multiple nuclear-armed adversaries, with a particular focus on China's significantly expanding nuclear capabilities. Although the White House has not officially announced any changes to its nuclear deterrence strategy, the reports come at a time of heightened concern over potential nuclear threats from global adversaries such as China and Russia. The Pentagon's latest assessments indicate that Beijing now possesses over 500 operational nuclear warheads. This number is expected to surpass 1,000 by 2030, reflecting a rapid and concerning expansion of China's nuclear arsenal. The growing military collaboration between Russia, China, and North Korea, particularly in the context of Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine, has further exacerbated security concerns for the United States and its allies in the Indo-Pacific region. As these relationships deepen, the strategic environment becomes increasingly complex, requiring the U.S. to adapt its nuclear deterrence strategies accordingly. During his presidential campaign, former President Donald Trump repeatedly warned of an impending nuclear conflict, arguing that the U.S. could be heading toward a major nuclear confrontation. In an interview with Elon Musk, streamed live on X (formerly known as Twitter), Trump suggested that China might soon "catch up, maybe even surpass" the U.S. in terms of nuclear weapons capabilities. China's response to these claims was swift. Lin Jian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, addressed the issue at a press conference, stating that the "nuclear arsenal of the U.S. is way bigger than China's." Lin reiterated China's "no-first-use" policy, which commits the nation to not using nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction as a first strike in warfare. This policy stands in stark contrast to the aggressive nuclear posturing that has characterized recent global discourse. The Pentagon's report from the previous fall provided a sobering assessment of the U.S.'s own nuclear capabilities. It revealed that the United States has about 3,700 nuclear warheads in its stockpile, with approximately 1,419 strategic nuclear weapons currently deployed. These figures illustrate the scale of the U.S.'s nuclear arsenal, which, despite China's rapid expansion, remains significantly larger. As the Biden administration continues to navigate this increasingly volatile global landscape, the recent updates to the "Nuclear Employment Guidance" reflect a broader recognition of the shifting balance of power. The focus on China underscores the growing challenge that Beijing's military advancements pose to U.S. national security and global stability. In this context, the revisions to Washington's nuclear strategy represent not just a response to immediate threats, but a long-term adjustment to the changing dynamics of international security. The coming years will likely see further developments in this area as the U.S. seeks to maintain its strategic edge in an increasingly multipolar world. As tensions with nuclear-armed adversaries continue to rise, the importance of a robust and adaptable deterrence strategy cannot be overstated. Credit: Newsweek 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

David Lammy, the UK's Foreign Secretary, is under scrutiny for what many see as a broken promise to officially accuse China of genocide in Xinjiang. Last year, Lammy had committed to declaring the actions of Xi Jinping’s regime against the Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang as genocide. This commitment followed Labour’s earlier support in the Commons in 2021 for such a declaration. However, recent developments suggest a shift in the government's stance, leading to widespread criticism. The situation in Xinjiang, where approximately one million Uighur Muslims have been forced into internment camps, has been widely condemned. Reports from the region describe severe abuses and political indoctrination, which many international observers and human rights organizations have labeled as crimes against humanity. The international community has been pressing for stronger action, and Lammy's initial promise was seen as a significant step in holding China accountable. When asked by The Telegraph whether the UK would officially accuse China of genocide, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) refrained from using the term "genocide" and instead referred to the "repression" of Uighurs. An FCDO spokesman stated, "We are playing a leading role in pressing China to improve its human rights record and cease the repression of the Uighur people in Xinjiang. This includes raising our concerns at the highest levels of the Chinese government and coordinating efforts in international fora to hold China to account for human rights violations." This statement has fueled concerns that the UK government is stepping back from its previous commitments. The reluctance to use the term "genocide" is seen by critics as a significant shift in policy. This controversy comes on the heels of Labour's decision not to declare China a "threat," a promise that had been made in the Conservative manifesto by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. A week after his election, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer had pledged to be "robust" with China and challenge it on human rights and security issues. However, recent actions by his government have raised doubts about the fulfillment of these promises. Adding to the criticism is the recent delay by Starmer's government in implementing a new law to monitor lobbyists from Russia and China. This delay has sparked fears that the scheme could be diluted or even scrapped, further weakening the UK's stance on foreign influence and human rights abuses. The backlash against Lammy and the Labour government has been swift and severe. A report published by global experts in 2021 accused the Chinese government of violating every provision of the United Nations genocide convention in its actions in Xinjiang. Sir Iain Duncan Smith, a former Conservative leader, expressed his concern, stating, "This is madness, and it is another backslide. This is very dangerous. They knew what the risks from China were when they were in opposition, and they made sure that the Conservative government, which hadn’t been brilliant on it, got the message. But now they are in government, they are in the hands of the Foreign Office. Those of us who are sanctioned by the Chinese government are now very worried that Labour is now starting to backslide on its previous commitments." Alicia Kearns, a shadow foreign minister and Tory MP, also voiced her disapproval, accusing Lammy of reneging on pre-election commitments. "David Lammy promised a Labour Government would formally recognize the atrocities faced by the Uyghurs as genocide, pursue justice for their plight through international courts, and fundamentally reassess the UK’s relationship with China within 100 days of taking office," Kearns said. "Instead, within 100 days, Labour has reneged on these promises. We were promised a tougher stance on China by Labour – now, even Conservative measures introduced with cross-party support are being dropped. Protecting ourselves from CCP influence is a generational challenge, not just one of many pre-election pledges to be reneged on once in office." China, for its part, has consistently denied allegations of human rights abuses in Xinjiang, claiming that its policies are necessary to combat religious extremism and terrorism. Despite these denials, the international community has remained largely unconvinced, with many calling for stronger actions to hold China accountable for its treatment of the Uighur population. As the controversy unfolds, Lammy and the Labour government face increasing pressure to clarify their position on China and to follow through on their promises. The debate over whether to label China's actions as genocide is not just a matter of semantics but a critical issue that could define the UK's foreign policy approach in the years to come. With criticism mounting from both political opponents and human rights advocates, the government’s handling of this issue will be closely watched, both domestically and internationally. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Tensions are rising in the volatile South China Sea, where fresh confrontations between China and the Philippines have escalated the risks closer to the shores of a key U.S. ally. In the early hours of Monday morning, a series of collisions occurred between coast guard ships from the two nations, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing disputes over territorial claims in the region. The incidents unfolded in the dark of night, between 3 a.m. and 4 a.m. local time, when at least three collisions were reported near Sabina Shoal, an uninhabited reef located just 75 nautical miles from the Philippines’ west coast. According to the Philippine authorities, the first collision caused a significant hole, 3.6 feet in diameter, on the starboard side of a Philippine coast guard vessel. Only 16 minutes later, another Chinese coast guard ship rammed a different Philippine coast guard vessel twice, creating a gap 2.5 feet long and 3 feet wide on the port side. The Philippine government has squarely blamed China for these incidents, accusing the Chinese coast guard of aggressive and dangerous maneuvers. "We can fairly say that this is the biggest structural damage we have incurred as a result of the dangerous maneuvers carried out by the Chinese coast guard," said Jay Tarriela, a spokesman for the Philippine coast guard. China, however, has a different version of events, accusing the Philippine coast guard of deliberately causing the collisions. These latest confrontations are particularly significant because they occurred near Sabina Shoal, a location that has recently become a new flashpoint in the ongoing territorial disputes between the two nations. While previous confrontations have centered around Second Thomas Shoal, located about 30 nautical miles west of Sabina Shoal and roughly 100 nautical miles off the Philippines' west coast, Monday’s incidents mark a worrying shift in the focus of these disputes. Second Thomas Shoal, unlike Sabina Shoal, is a military outpost manned by a small detachment of Filipino marines. The area has been a source of tension for over a year, with China repeatedly trying to disrupt the Philippines’ resupply missions to the outpost. Despite an agreement reached in July between the two nations to ease tensions, disagreements have persisted, and Monday’s collision raises new questions about the durability of that deal. As the Philippines has adopted a more assertive stance against China’s expansive claims in the South China Sea, it has faced increased pressure from Beijing. This pressure has been exerted both diplomatically and through forceful actions at sea. Chinese vessels have employed various aggressive tactics around Second Thomas Shoal, including spraying water cannons, ramming Philippine ships, and even threatening Filipino military personnel with axes and knives. The Chinese coast guard is often accompanied by maritime militia boats, further outnumbering the Philippines in these encounters. While Sabina Shoal was not initially considered a major flashpoint like Second Thomas Shoal, tensions have been brewing there for months. China claims both sites, which lie within the Philippines’ 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone, as part of its broader claim to much of the South China Sea. However, a 2016 ruling by an international arbitral tribunal found that China’s claims have no legal basis—a ruling that Beijing has steadfastly rejected. In response to what it perceives as increased Chinese activity at Sabina Shoal, the Philippines has taken steps to assert its presence in the area. In mid-April, the Philippines deployed a large coast guard ship, the BRP Teresa Magbanua, for an extended stay at Sabina Shoal. This move was prompted by China’s increased deployment of maritime militia boats and research vessels to the area. In a briefing to journalists in May, the Philippine coast guard reported that Chinese research vessels had been observed at Sabina Shoal, sending divers to take measurements and make assessments of the area. The Philippines’ response included deploying small inflatable boats to monitor Chinese activities more closely. On at least one occasion, these boats were blocked by Chinese coast guard ships. The Philippine coast guard also reported the presence of Chinese navy vessels and helicopters, as well as a significant number of maritime militia boats at the site. Philippine divers tasked with studying the area also made a disturbing discovery: what appeared to be dead and crushed corals dumped underwater at various locations around Sabina Shoal. The Philippine coast guard warned that this could be a precursor to possible land reclamation by China—a tactic that Beijing has used before in the South China Sea, where it has constructed artificial islands that now serve as military bases. "If we don’t monitor and guard this, maybe in the following months, we’ll be shocked again that in Sabina Shoal, they’ve expanded the island," Tarriela warned during the May briefing. In response, China’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the Philippine assertions as "sheer rumor" and accused Manila of spreading "irresponsible claims designed to vilify China and mislead the international community." Over the months following these accusations, China has continued to pressure the Philippines, urging Manila to withdraw its vessels from Sabina Shoal. The situation came to a head on Monday when the two Philippine coast guard ships involved in the collisions were en route to resupply a different Philippine site in the South China Sea. The ships were passing near Sabina Shoal when they encountered the Chinese coast guard. Despite sustaining significant damage, the Philippine ships continued their mission, according to statements from the Philippine government. These incidents underscore the increasingly dangerous situation in the South China Sea, where the risk of escalation into a broader conflict looms large. The proximity of these confrontations to the Philippines, a key U.S. ally, raises the stakes for all parties involved, particularly given the potential for U.S. involvement under its mutual defense treaty with Manila. The South China Sea has long been a flashpoint for geopolitical tensions, with multiple nations laying claim to various parts of the sea. However, the recent encounters between China and the Philippines, particularly near Sabina Shoal, have brought the dangers closer to home for the Philippines. As China continues to assert its claims in the region, the potential for further confrontations—and the risk of these incidents spiraling into a larger conflict—remains high. The Philippines, for its part, is likely to continue its efforts to resist China’s advances in the South China Sea, bolstered by its alliance with the United States. However, as the events of Monday demonstrate, the path ahead is fraught with peril, and the situation remains volatile. The collisions at Sabina Shoal are a stark reminder of the fragility of peace in the South China Sea and the ever-present risks that come with contested territorial claims in one of the world’s most strategically important regions. Credit: WSJ 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Controversial influencer Andrew Tate has been remanded in custody as part of an investigation into new allegations against him. Romanian police have conducted another raid on the residence of Andrew Tate, who is currently facing serious charges, including human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women. The raid took place on Wednesday morning at the home Tate shares with his brother, Tristan Tate, in Romania. Both brothers have been under intense scrutiny as they await trial for these allegations. A dozen masked officers descended upon the property, marking another significant moment in the ongoing investigation led by Romania’s anti-organized crime agency, DIICOT. The agency confirmed that four homes in the counties of Bucharest and Ilfov were being searched in connection with a broad investigation that includes allegations of human trafficking, trafficking of minors, sexual intercourse with a minor, influencing statements, and money laundering. The presence of police and forensic teams at the Tate residence underscores the seriousness with which Romanian authorities are pursuing these charges. Mateea Petrescu, a spokesperson for Andrew Tate, responded to the raids by acknowledging that the charges listed in the search warrant were not fully clarified at the time but included suspicions of human trafficking and money laundering. Petrescu emphasized that the legal team representing the Tates was present during the raids, although notably, there was no direct addressal of the allegations involving minors. As the investigation continues, the Romanian authorities have reiterated the importance of the legal process and the rights of those under investigation. DIICOT stated, “During the entire criminal process, the investigated persons benefit from the procedural rights and guarantees provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure, as well as the presumption of innocence.” This statement highlights that, despite the severity of the allegations, the legal system in Romania ensures that the accused are afforded their legal rights and protections. Andrew Tate, 37, and his brother Tristan, 36, are both former kickboxers and hold dual British-U.S. citizenship. They have gained massive followings on social media, amassing millions of followers worldwide. However, their online presence has been marred by controversy, particularly Andrew Tate’s expression of misogynistic views. The brothers were arrested in 2022 near Bucharest, alongside two Romanian women, and were formally indicted by Romanian prosecutors last year. They have consistently denied all allegations. The legal process has been lengthy, with the Bucharest Tribunal ruling in April that the prosecutors’ case file against the Tates met the necessary legal criteria, thereby allowing a trial to proceed. However, the court did not set a specific date for the trial to begin. The delay was partly due to the preliminary chamber stages, where defendants have the opportunity to challenge the evidence and the case file presented by the prosecutors. Following their arrest in 2022, the Tate brothers were initially held in police detention for three months before being placed under house arrest. Their movements were further restricted to the Bucharest and Ilfov counties, and later to all of Romania. Last month, a court decision that had allowed the Tates to leave Romania was overturned. Previously, on July 5, the court had ruled that the brothers could travel within the 27-member European Union as long as they remained within its borders. However, the more recent ruling is final, and they must stay in Romania as they await trial. Andrew Tate has consistently maintained his innocence, claiming that there is no evidence against him and alleging that the charges are part of a broader political conspiracy aimed at silencing him. Despite his legal troubles, Tate continues to wield significant influence online, with 9.9 million followers on the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter). His notoriety online is linked to his outspoken and often controversial views, which have previously led to bans from various social media platforms due to his misogynistic remarks and hate speech. In addition to the ongoing Romanian case, the Tate brothers are also facing legal challenges in the United Kingdom. In March, they appeared at the Bucharest Court of Appeal following British authorities’ issuance of arrest warrants related to allegations of sexual aggression in a U.K. case dating back to 2012-2015. The appeals court in Romania granted the British request to extradite the Tates, but stipulated that the extradition would only occur after the legal proceedings in Romania have been concluded. Credit: The Independent 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a recent interview, former President Donald Trump revealed that he would consider offering Tesla CEO Elon Musk a position in his Cabinet if he wins the upcoming November election. The suggestion, which came during a conversation with Reuters, highlights Trump's admiration for Musk's intellect and capabilities. "He's a very smart guy. I certainly would, if he would do it, I certainly would. He's a brilliant guy," Trump stated, underscoring the high regard in which he holds Musk. This potential collaboration between the former president and the tech mogul is a reflection of Trump's strategic thinking, as he appears to be drawing on Musk's vast expertise in technology and business. During the same interview, Trump also hinted at a possible reversal of the $7,500 tax credit currently available to Americans who purchase electric vehicles. This tax credit has been a central component of the Biden administration's efforts to promote the adoption of electric vehicles as part of a broader strategy to combat climate change. Trump's openness to reconsidering this policy suggests a shift in the approach to environmental and energy issues that have been a focal point of the current administration. Musk, who has been a prominent figure in both the technology and automotive industries, also owns the social media platform X. His involvement in the political sphere has been evident, as he endorsed Trump in the presidential race and threw his support behind a super PAC that is backing the former president's bid for office. This endorsement aligns with Musk's growing influence in various sectors, and his potential role in a future Trump administration could further extend his reach. The connection between Trump and Musk was further solidified last week when the two engaged in a two-hour conversation on X. During this discussion, Musk indicated his willingness to contribute to a government commission focused on studying the national debt and exploring ways in which Congress could reassess federal spending. The possibility of Musk taking on a Cabinet position was not mentioned during this exchange, but his interest in addressing governmental efficiency was clear. "I think it would be great to just have a government efficiency commission that looks at these things to make sure taxpayer money is spent in a good way," Musk told Trump during their conversation. "I'd be happy to help out on such a commission." Musk's statement reflects his pragmatic approach to governance and fiscal responsibility, areas where his expertise could be particularly valuable. Trump's consideration of Musk for a Cabinet role, along with the latter's openness to contributing to government initiatives, signals a potential collaboration that could bring significant changes to how the federal government operates. As both figures are known for their unconventional approaches and willingness to challenge the status quo, their partnership could lead to innovative solutions to some of the most pressing issues facing the nation. While the idea of Musk serving in a Trump Cabinet remains speculative, the mere suggestion of such a partnership has generated considerable interest. Both Trump and Musk have made headlines for their bold decisions and influential roles in their respective fields, and a collaboration between the two could potentially reshape aspects of American governance, particularly in areas related to technology, energy, and fiscal policy. As the election approaches, it remains to be seen whether Musk will indeed be offered a Cabinet position or if he will choose to serve on a government commission as he has expressed interest in doing. However, the dialogue between Trump and Musk highlights the former president's strategic considerations in assembling a team that could address the nation's challenges in innovative ways. With Musk's track record of success in multiple industries, his involvement in a future Trump administration could have far-reaching implications for the country's direction. Credit: Hill 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

John Fetterman, the towering and unconventional senator from Pennsylvania, is no stranger to controversy or the complexities of his own party. Once hailed as a beacon of Rust Belt revitalization and a progressive champion, Fetterman has recently found himself increasingly at odds with the Democratic Party. His steadfast support for Israel, particularly in the wake of the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, has drawn both public protests and internal criticism. Despite the mounting pressure, Fetterman remains unyielding in his stance, emphasizing his commitment to what he perceives as the morally correct path, even if it means alienating himself from the very base that once celebrated him. Fetterman’s decision to skip the Democratic National Convention in Chicago this year has raised eyebrows and fueled speculation about his standing within the party. However, the senator is quick to dismiss any notion that his absence has anything to do with the growing discord over his pro-Israel stance. "I’ve got three young kids, and they’re out of school," Fetterman explained, emphasizing his desire to spend time with his family over the four-day event. He also clarified that the decision to miss the convention was made "well before that debate," referring to the June 27 confrontation between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, which ultimately led to Biden stepping aside and Kamala Harris securing the Democratic nomination. The contrast between Fetterman and Harris could not be starker. Fetterman, a six-foot-eight figure clad in hoodies and shorts, resides in Braddock, a struggling ex-steel town just outside Pittsburgh that has lost 90 percent of its population. Harris, on the other hand, owns a home in the affluent Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles and is often seen donning double-stranded pearls and pantsuits. While Fetterman’s politics are fueled by what seems to be an earnest and almost reckless sense of righteousness, Harris’s beliefs remain less clear, leaving some to question what she truly stands for. On the day of the Hamas attacks, Harris tweeted a message that was as inoffensive as it was unobjectionable: "Doug’s and my prayers are with the victims of the heinous terrorist attacks in Israel. @POTUS and my support for Israel’s security is unwavering." Meanwhile, Fetterman’s response was far more forceful: "I forcefully condemn these cowardly, horrifying, unprovoked attacks on Israel by Hamas. Attacking innocent civilians is particularly despicable and reflects the craven behavior of this terrorist group. I unequivocally stand with the people of Israel now, and always." This disparity in responses highlights the growing chasm within the Democratic Party, particularly when it comes to Israel. While Harris’s statement was designed to offend as few people as possible, Fetterman’s declaration left no room for ambiguity. It is perhaps this stark clarity in his position that has led to his increasing isolation within the party. When asked if he ever feels lonely in his own party, Fetterman responded with uneasy laughter, "Well, I mean, it’s, it’s… I keep saying, just like the convention, it’s not about me." Despite his reassurances, it’s difficult to ignore the shift that has taken place within the Democratic Party—a shift that has left Fetterman, once a symbol of Rust Belt cool and progressive values, out in the cold. In 2022, Fetterman was the darling of the left. He was bald, hulking, and adorned with a goatee and tattoos, projecting a surly demeanor that resonated with voters who felt the Democratic Party had drifted too far from its working-class roots. His support for LGBTQIA+ rights and pro-choice stance further endeared him to the party’s progressive wing. Celebrities like Kerry Washington, Padma Lakshmi, John Legend, and even Oprah Winfrey—who had previously helped launch the television career of Fetterman’s Trump-backed Republican opponent, Dr. Mehmet Oz—lined up to endorse him. But the love affair with Fetterman didn’t last. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, one of the most prominent voices of the progressive left, suggested in May that Fetterman is a bully. Former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan lamented on Twitter that "a lot of folks don’t recognize John Fetterman these days." The Patriot-News, based in Harrisburg, published an op-ed titled "I wish I had never voted for you," addressing Fetterman directly. The turning point for Fetterman’s relationship with the progressive wing of the party appears to have been his shift away from identifying as a progressive. In December, the senator tweeted, "I’m not a progressive, I’m just a regular Democrat," signaling a departure from his earlier self-identification as a "progressive champion" during his unsuccessful Senate run in 2016. This shift, coupled with his unwavering support for Israel, has left many progressives feeling betrayed. Since the October 7 attacks, Fetterman has found an unexpected, albeit cautious, warmth from Republicans. "How is it possible that John Fetterman in the last few months has seemingly become more based than half of the Senate GOP???" Donald Trump Jr. tweeted in January. A Republican strategist, speaking on condition of anonymity, confessed, "No clue what this cat is up to." Fetterman’s embrace of border security may have contributed to this newfound, albeit tenuous, appreciation from the right, but his real transgression in the eyes of progressives has been his unflinching support for Israel. The backlash has been swift and unrelenting. In November, protesters outside the Capitol booed him. In January, anti-Israel protesters descended on Fetterman’s home in Braddock, where he defiantly took to the roof, waving an Israeli flag. Online, activists derisively dubbed him "Genocide John." Every Friday for months, protesters have demonstrated outside his Philadelphia office, chanting slogans like "Let Gaza live" and "Cease-fire now." These protests, known as "Fridays at Fetterman’s," have become a regular occurrence. The opposition to Fetterman’s stance isn’t limited to external activists. Even within his own office, there are staff members who disagree with him on Israel and Gaza. "I don’t agree with him," admitted Carrie Adams, Fetterman’s communications director, in a candid phone conversation. Adams suggested that Fetterman’s views are shaped by a less nuanced understanding of the region, influenced by the "might makes right" mentality prevalent during his formative years. In contrast, she noted that her generation and younger ones—who are often the ones protesting—tend to have a more nuanced view of the region. This level of internal dissent is rare in Washington, especially when it comes to criticizing "the principal," as Fetterman is known within his team. It underscores the generational and ideological divide that has opened up within the Democratic Party, particularly on issues related to Israel and Palestine. A January poll revealed that 65 percent of college students held a favorable opinion of the pro-Hamas encampments that took over many university campuses in the spring. This generational divide is not confined to college campuses; it has infiltrated the party’s ranks, threatening to erupt during the convention, where as many as 100,000 protesters are expected. Fetterman is keenly aware of the divide but remains steadfast in his convictions. "I’ve been frustrated by some of my members and how they’ve chosen to handle that situation," Fetterman said, referring to Israel’s war against Hamas. While he did not name specific Democratic members, it is likely he was alluding to the Squad and other members of the Progressive Caucus who have been vocal in their criticism of Israel. "I don’t agree with a lot of their views, but whatever kinds of political choices or any kind of political costs that I’ve incurred throughout all that, I don’t care." He added with conviction, "I haven’t once even regretted any of that." Fetterman’s unconventional style and progressive policies made him a darling of the left, but his recent shift on Israel has caused a rift with the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. His decision to distance himself from the progressive label and his unwavering support for Israel have led to accusations of betrayal from some of his former supporters. Despite the criticism, Fetterman remains unapologetic. He argues that his support for Israel is rooted in a commitment to justice and the protection of innocent lives. "There’s a moral imperative to support Israel in its fight against terrorism," Fetterman has said. "Hamas is a terrorist organization that has killed thousands of innocent people. To equate their actions with those of a democratic state like Israel is not only wrong but dangerous." Fetterman’s stance has earned him praise from some quarters, including Republicans who see him as a rare Democratic voice willing to stand up for Israel. However, it has also alienated him from many of his former allies on the left. The protests outside his home and office, as well as the criticism from within his own team, are indicative of the deep divisions that have opened up within the Democratic Party on this issue. He is driven by a deep sense of moral duty, one that often puts him at odds with the very people who once supported him. In the end, Fetterman’s journey from progressive hero to polarizing figure within his own party underscores the complexities of modern American politics. It is a reminder that even in a time of deep political polarization, there are still those who are willing to stand firm in their beliefs, no matter the cost. Whether Fetterman’s stance will ultimately prove to be politically wise or whether it will cost him the support of his party remains an open question. For now, he seems content to weather the storm, confident in the righteousness of his cause and unafraid of the consequences. Credit: TFP 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a political landscape where the far right is gaining ground in various parts of the world, Britain’s newly elected Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, has chosen a seemingly unconventional approach to counter this threat. While many leaders opt for stringent immigration policies or aggressive rhetoric, Starmer’s strategy is rooted in pragmatism and a desire to restore the public’s faith in government. His allies believe that addressing tangible, everyday issues like potholes in the roads and reducing hospital waiting times could be the key to defeating the far right in Britain. Starmer’s recent visit to Belfast underscored his commitment to tackling the aftermath of a series of anti-immigration riots that had erupted across Britain. These riots, a rare occurrence of violent lawlessness, demanded an urgent and robust response from the government. The initial reaction was to focus on law and order, a strategy that aligned with Starmer’s background as a former prosecutor. The government swiftly deployed extra police officers, held additional court hearings, and the U.K. Home Office called for volunteers to assist in handling the situation. By the end of the week, over 1,000 people had been arrested, and more than 600 charges had been issued in connection with the riots, as reported by the National Police Chiefs’ Council. However, the more significant challenge for Starmer lies in addressing the deep-rooted socio-economic issues that have created the conditions for such violence. Starmer’s team believes that the answer to these problems lies in demonstrating that politics can solve real-world issues, thereby rebuilding Britain’s battered faith in its political system. A Labour MP close to Starmer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, emphasized the need to be pragmatic and clear about why politics is still relevant. "There is a deep sense that nobody is listening and that politics doesn’t make any difference. We have to be very pragmatic and clear about why that is not true," the MP stated. Starmer’s crackdown on rioters has resonated with the public, fitting neatly with his law-and-order credentials. Polling data shows that the majority of the electorate viewed the violent unrest as unacceptable, with two-thirds of voters characterizing the participants as “thugs,” according to research by YouGov. However, while only a small minority supported the violence, 16 percent of respondents believed that the rioters had legitimate concerns, with many pointing to immigration policy as a contributing factor. Luke Tryl, director of the polling firm More in Common, highlighted a widespread disillusionment with politics among the British public. "Politics isn’t working and it can’t deliver," Tryl noted, emphasizing that this sentiment extends beyond immigration issues to include everyday concerns such as access to healthcare, long waiting lists, and the rising cost of living. "That is something that politicians need to grasp because it is not sustainable to have a functioning democracy with such high levels of disillusionment," he added. Starmer and his team have long been considering how to address this deep-seated alienation. Their strategy is focused on delivering tangible results over the course of their parliamentary term. The same Labour MP close to Starmer mentioned earlier explained, "The central idea was focusing on a thing that we know we can do, and then doing it over the course of the parliament." This approach might involve something as seemingly simple as "mending every single pothole in Britain," a task that could serve as a symbol of political relevance in areas affected by the riots. The idea of focusing on practical, everyday issues has been influenced by the experience of local Labour politicians who successfully took on the British National Party (BNP) in the early 2000s. The BNP had made significant gains in Barking and Dagenham, a traditionally white, working-class area in East London. Margaret Hodge, a former Labour MP for Barking, drew parallels between the rise of the BNP and the current situation. Hodge recalled that at the time, people felt that the government was not listening to them or understanding their day-to-day problems. The response, she said, was not about "rocket science," but about addressing local concerns such as littering, graffiti, and parking shortages. One of the architects of this local strategy was Morgan McSweeney, who is now Starmer’s right-hand man in Downing Street. McSweeney played a crucial role in formulating Labour’s successful strategy during the 2024 election campaign and is now focused on ensuring that the government delivers on its promises. A senior Labour politician close to No. 10 mentioned that McSweeney is deeply engaged in the process of understanding the various factors contributing to the rise of the far right and devising strategies to counter it. "How to get these people arrested and banged up. And then more deeply about the politics and about the different strands behind it and what the government has to do to counter it," the politician stated. Despite the clear focus on addressing practical issues, some observers believe that Starmer needs to go beyond a purely pragmatic response. Parth Patel, a senior research fellow at the left-leaning think tank IPPR, suggested that there might be a reluctance on the part of Downing Street to engage in conversations about migration. "But if the government doesn’t articulate its views on identity and immigration in modern Britain, basically the most contentious issue of the 21st century, those debates will continually be dragged to the far right," Patel warned. Hodge agreed with the need for a more comprehensive approach. "Now we’re in government, we have a very powerful voice that can start developing a different discourse about integration," she said. The importance of addressing immigration and community identity cannot be overstated, especially as these issues have surged to the top of the list of public concerns, alongside law and order. Successfully articulating a new position for Labour on these issues may prove as challenging as reducing NHS waiting times, but Starmer has one significant advantage at this point in his premiership. As Tryl observed, "People might have low expectations of this government, but they definitely want him to give it a shot, and they want him to succeed." Credit: Politico 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a spirited address at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, President Joe Biden spoke to a crowd that, until recently, he had expected to address as the party's presidential nominee. Instead, Biden, who chose to cede the nomination to Vice President Kamala Harris following concerns about his age, used his speech to pass the torch to a new leader while emphasizing the threats to democracy posed by extremism. His speech, frequently interrupted by chants of "Thank you, Joe," reflected his commitment to the party and his determination to safeguard democratic values. Biden’s address was marked by moments of passion, particularly when discussing the preservation of democracy. "We came together in 2020 to save democracy," Biden declared, his voice rising in anger as he recounted the challenges faced during his presidency. Harris, who had surprised the audience with an earlier appearance at the lectern, echoed this sentiment, saying, "When we fight," before the crowd finished the phrase, "we win." The energy of the evening was palpable, with multiple speakers highlighting the significance of this moment in American political history. Among those who praised Biden was former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who acknowledged Harris' historic role as the second woman to head a Democratic ticket. Clinton also paid homage to other pioneering Democratic women, including Shirley Chisholm, the first Black woman to run for president in 1972, and Geraldine Ferraro, the first female vice-presidential nominee from a major American political party in 1984. The night was filled with reflections on the progress made and the challenges ahead, as the Democratic Party prepared to move forward under new leadership. Throughout the evening, speakers criticized the policies of former President Donald Trump, particularly those concerning the Supreme Court's decisions that led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The repeated slogan, "We’re not going back," underscored the party's commitment to preserving the rights that were at risk of being rolled back. In his speech, Biden highlighted several key issues, making claims that warranted closer examination. Below is an analysis of some of the statements made by Biden and other speakers during the convention’s first night, along with fact-checking based on available data and expert opinions. Abortion and Trump’s Stance Biden claimed that "Trump will do everything to ban abortion nationwide." This statement requires a nuanced analysis. Since April, Trump has consistently stated that he believes abortion legislation should be "left up to the states." In April, he told reporters that he would not sign a national ban. However, during his presidency, Trump endorsed a 20-week national abortion ban that was supported by House Republicans. Earlier in the 2024 election year, he also suggested support for 15- or 16-week federal abortion bans, as reported by various news outlets. While Trump has not explicitly advocated for a nationwide abortion ban, his support for federal restrictions indicates that Biden’s claim, while not entirely accurate, is rooted in concerns about Trump’s potential influence on abortion legislation. Further complicating this issue is the ambiguity surrounding Trump's position on other methods of restricting abortion, such as using the Comstock Act to ban the mailing of abortion pills or equipment used in abortion procedures. Trump's stance on these matters remains unclear, leaving room for interpretation and concern about the potential implications of his policies. The DNC’s Video Advertisement on Trump and Abortion A DNC video advertisement highlighted a statement Trump made in 2016, where he said, "There has to be some form of punishment" for women who have abortions. However, this ad is misleading as it fails to acknowledge that Trump quickly walked back this comment after facing widespread criticism. He clarified that it was doctors, not women, who should be punished for performing illegal abortions. Since then, there has been no evidence to suggest that Trump has reiterated this position or currently supports penalties for women who undergo abortions. Therefore, the ad’s portrayal of Trump’s stance is mostly false, as it omits critical context and misrepresents his current views. Health Care and Insulin Costs Biden claimed that "Instead of paying $400 a month for insulin, seniors with diabetes will pay $35 a month." This statement is partially accurate. The Inflation Reduction Act, which Biden signed into law in 2022, indeed capped out-of-pocket insulin costs at $35 a month for Medicare enrollees starting in 2023. However, drug pricing experts and research suggest that most Medicare enrollees were not paying $400 a month for insulin before these changes. A government estimate found that people with diabetes enrolled in Medicare or private insurance paid an average of $452 a year—approximately $38 a month. Uninsured users, on the other hand, paid significantly more, averaging about $996 annually. While some Medicare enrollees may have paid $400 in a given month, the statement requires context to avoid misleading implications. Social Security and Medicare Biden also stated that "Trump wants to cut Social Security and Medicare." This assertion is mostly false, particularly regarding Social Security. Although Trump has previously expressed openness to overhauling Social Security, including cuts and privatization, his stance has evolved. In a March 2024 CNBC interview, Trump mentioned that "There’s a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting," but he quickly retracted this statement. His campaign website explicitly states that not "a single penny" should be cut from Social Security. Regarding Medicare, Trump has said during the 2024 presidential campaign that he will not cut the program. However, it is worth noting that during his presidency, Trump proposed cuts to Medicare in four successive annual budgets, though experts remain divided on the potential impact of these cuts on beneficiaries. Biden’s claim, therefore, exaggerates the current stance of Trump and his campaign. Immigration and Border Encounters Addressing immigration, Biden stated, "The result of the executive action I took: Border encounters have dropped over 50 percent. In fact, there are fewer border crossings today than when Donald Trump left office." This statement is mostly true, but it requires context. Illegal border crossings in July 2024 were indeed lower than in December 2020, Trump’s last full month in office. However, experts caution against attributing changes in immigration solely to a single policy. The executive action in question, which limits the ability to apply for asylum at the southwest border, took effect in June, making it difficult to determine whether the declining trend will continue. In July, Border Patrol reported 56,408 encounters, a 52 percent drop from May's 117,900 encounters. Comparatively, in December 2020, there were 71,140 encounters. While Biden’s statement is accurate, it oversimplifies a complex issue that involves multiple factors and policies. Crime Rates and Trump’s Tenure Biden claimed that "On (Trump’s) watch the murder rate went up 30 percent, the biggest increase in history." This statement is half true. The number of murders in the United States did increase significantly from 2019 to 2020, with a rise of about 35 percent, making it the largest one-year increase since systematic record-keeping began in the early 1960s. However, most crime data analysts attribute the spike to a combination of the COVID-19 pandemic and the social unrest following George Floyd’s murder, rather than Trump’s direct actions. While the murder rate did rise dramatically during Trump’s presidency, attributing this solely to his watch oversimplifies the contributing factors. The Semiconductor Industry and Wage Claims In his speech, Biden claimed that the average semiconductor industry salary "will be over $100,000 a year, and you don’t need a college degree." This statement is mostly false. While the average salary in the semiconductor industry is around $170,000 according to the Semiconductor Industry Association and Oxford Economics, this figure includes all jobs within the industry, not just those that do not require a college degree. The most a person without a four-year degree can typically make in the industry is about $70,000, according to a 2021 report from the Semiconductor Industry Association and Oxford Economics. Biden’s claim, therefore, overstates the earning potential for those without a college degree in the semiconductor industry. The Racial Wealth Gap Biden also mentioned that during his tenure, there has been the "smallest racial wealth gap in 20 years." This statement is half true. Biden was referencing 2022 Federal Reserve data that showed a modest decrease in the wealth ratio between white and Black Americans. For every $100 the average white family held in wealth, the average Black family had $15.75. While this was the smallest gap in 20 years by one measure, another measure—the dollar amount difference in wealth—showed that the gap widened to its largest disparity since 1989. Therefore, Biden’s claim is partially accurate but does not capture the full complexity of the racial wealth gap. Tax Rates on Billionaires Biden claimed that "We have 1,000 billionaires in America. You know what their average tax rate (is)? 8.2 percent." This statement is false. The richest Americans currently pay an effective tax rate of more than 20 percent on income recognized by the government under the current tax code. Biden’s figure of 8.2 percent is based on a comparison that includes income not currently taxed under law, making it a theoretical figure rather than an accurate representation of what anyone is supposed to pay under the existing tax system. As a result, Biden’s statement is misleading and does not reflect the actual tax rates paid by billionaires. Trump and the Rule of Law Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: Trump “fell asleep at his own trial, and when he woke up, he made his own kind of history: the first person to run for president with 34 felony convictions.” It’s unclear whether Trump fell asleep during the Manhattan trial that ended with the former president found guilty on all counts. The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman reported that Trump “appeared to nod off a few times, his mouth going slack and his head drooping onto his chest.” But Trump and his team have rebutted the he-was-sleeping claims. Trump was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a scheme to cover up a hush money payment to adult film actor Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. The U.S. Constitution doesn’t prevent Trump from running for president following his conviction. Convicted felons have run for president in the past. Conclusion Biden’s DNC speech and the subsequent remarks by other speakers highlighted critical issues facing the nation while passing the mantle of leadership to a new generation. While many of the claims made during the speech were rooted in truth, several were either misleading or lacked the necessary context for a complete understanding. As the 2024 election approaches, it is essential to critically assess statements made by political figures to ensure that voters are informed by accurate and comprehensive information. The speech, while evocative and energizing, serves as a reminder of the need for careful scrutiny of political rhetoric in the pursuit of a fair and democratic process. Credit: PBS 2024-08-21 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

A new biography of Queen Elizabeth II, written by the veteran journalist Craig Brown, has revealed candid and striking remarks the late monarch allegedly made about former U.S. President Donald Trump and his wife, Melania. Known for her discretion and astute judgment, Queen Elizabeth reportedly described Trump as "very rude" and speculated that he and Melania must have had "some sort of arrangement," questioning why she would have remained married to him otherwise. These claims are made in Brown's book, *A Voyage Around The Queen*, which is being serialized in the Daily Mail. The biography offers an intriguing blend of well-known anecdotes and fresh insights into the queen's life, drawing on Brown's connections within elite circles. The journalist, who has a background in Parliamentary sketch writing and contributions to the satirical magazine Private Eye, has long been regarded as an insider in British high society. His previous works, including a kaleidoscopic biography of Princess Margaret, have been praised for their originality and depth. In the new book, Brown recounts that a few weeks after Trump's visit to the United Kingdom in 2018, Queen Elizabeth confided in a lunch guest that she found the then-president "very rude." The queen reportedly took particular issue with Trump's habit of looking over her shoulder, as if he were searching for someone more interesting to engage with. This behavior, according to Brown, especially irked the queen. Furthermore, the queen is said to have speculated about the nature of Trump’s marriage to Melania, suggesting to her guest that the couple must have had some kind of arrangement. "Why would she have remained married to him?" the queen reportedly mused, expressing her bewilderment at the dynamics of their relationship. These revelations are particularly striking given the queen’s reputation for being a consummate diplomat who rarely voiced her personal opinions, especially in public or to those outside her immediate circle. Her comments, as recounted by Brown, offer a rare glimpse into her private thoughts about one of the most controversial figures she hosted during her long reign. Trump, for his part, has often spoken highly of Queen Elizabeth, describing their meetings in glowing terms. Following his state visit in 2019, Trump told Fox News that they had shared a jovial time together, saying, "We were laughing and having fun. And her people said she hasn’t had so much fun in 25 years." He later faced criticism for these remarks, with some suggesting that the lighthearted nature of the visit was inappropriate. Despite Trump’s public admiration for the queen, Buckingham Palace has not commented on the claims made in Brown’s book. The revelations add to the complex portrait of Queen Elizabeth as a leader who, while often seen as reserved, could also be a sharp judge of character, unafraid to express her true feelings in private. Brown’s biography, like his earlier work on Princess Margaret, combines a mix of well-known stories with original reporting, offering readers new insights into the lives of the British royal family. His portrayal of Queen Elizabeth, especially in her interactions with figures like Trump, provides a fresh perspective on the late monarch, highlighting her discerning nature and her ability to navigate the complexities of her role with both grace and subtlety. As the serialization of *A Voyage Around The Queen* continues, it is likely that more revelations will emerge, further illuminating the private thoughts and feelings of a monarch who was often viewed as inscrutable. For now, these accounts of her encounters with Donald Trump offer a fascinating glimpse into the inner world of Queen Elizabeth II, a figure who, even in her passing, continues to captivate the public imagination. Credit: Daily Beast 2024-08-21 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Nvidia Research has unveiled a groundbreaking generative AI weather model. This new model, which represents a significant leap forward in the accuracy of short-range weather forecasting, holds the potential to revolutionize how we predict and respond to natural disasters such as flash floods and tornado outbreaks. Nvidia shared the details of this innovative model with Axios, marking a pivotal moment in the intersection of technology and meteorology. The importance of this development cannot be overstated. Nvidia claims that this is the first AI model to demonstrate enhanced capability in simulating extreme weather events with precision down to the kilometer scale. If these findings are validated by other researchers, we could be on the cusp of a new era in weather forecasting. The implications of such advancements are profound, as more accurate short-term forecasts could save lives and protect property by providing more reliable warnings of impending weather hazards. Historically, AI weather and climate models developed by tech giants like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Google, as well as various research institutions, have shown promise in generating medium-range, global weather projections. These models have sometimes rivaled or even surpassed traditional, physics-based models that require the immense computing power of supercomputers. However, Nvidia’s latest model, as outlined in a new preprint study, takes this technology a step further. It not only delivers accurate forecasts but also offers the potential to refine global climate change projections for more precise application at local scales. This process, known as "downscaling," has traditionally been limited by computational constraints, but Nvidia's model could help overcome these barriers. "I'm convinced we're at that moment now where AI can compete with physics for storm-scale prediction," said Mike Pritchard, a climate scientist at Nvidia and a coauthor of the study, in an interview with Axios. His confidence underscores the transformative potential of this technology. The model, referred to as StormCast, is detailed in a paper submitted for peer review, co-authored by researchers from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of Washington. Nvidia asserts that StormCast can operate at the mesoscale level, meaning it can resolve small-scale weather systems and simulate some of the complex physics involved in the formation, intensification, and dissipation of thunderstorms. These "convection-allowing models" are crucial for predicting the development of dangerous weather phenomena like derechos, squall lines, and deadly flash floods. According to the study, StormCast already outperforms the top U.S. short-range weather prediction model, the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR), particularly in predicting the evolution of storms as observed on weather radar. Despite these advances, Pritchard emphasizes that traditional physics-based approaches should not be entirely supplanted by generative AI. Instead, he suggests that AI can be used to enhance and test the "physical credibility" of new models, ensuring that we can trust AI predictions and understand their limitations. The field of weather prediction and climate research is undergoing a rapid transformation, driven by the capabilities of AI models. These models offer significant advantages in terms of computational power and timeliness compared to traditional methods. While experts generally agree that the future of weather and climate forecasting will involve greater reliance on AI, there is also a consensus, including among Nvidia Research, that the established, proven methods should not be abandoned. One of the most intriguing aspects of AI models like StormCast is their ability to generate forecasts in minutes using readily available computers, a stark contrast to the hours it takes for traditional models to run on the world’s most powerful supercomputers. This speed opens up the possibility of incorporating such models into ensemble systems, where the model is run multiple times with slightly varied initial conditions. This approach can help forecasters assess the sensitivity of their predictions to changes in various parameters, thereby increasing confidence in the forecast or highlighting areas of uncertainty where storm behavior might differ from expectations. Nvidia, as a leader in AI-enabling chip technology, has made substantial investments in advancing scientific knowledge across various disciplines, including weather and climate science. The company has even created a digital twin of Earth, which Taiwan plans to use to improve typhoon predictions. StormCast is capable of producing hourly forecasts at small geographic scales, leveraging generative AI that has been trained on historical weather observations and forecast outcomes. Nvidia Research asserts that it is the first AI weather simulation to accurately predict variables like temperature and moisture concentration, which are crucial for determining atmospheric buoyancy. Buoyancy, in turn, plays a critical role in the formation of severe weather events, including tornadoes, large storm complexes, and heavy snowfall. This represents a significant breakthrough, as buoyancy is a key factor in determining whether a group of thunderstorms will intensify, merge into larger systems capable of producing flooding rains, or weaken and dissipate. Looking ahead, Nvidia is collaborating with The Weather Company and Colorado State University to further test the new model, with the possibility of making it more widely available in the future. This collaboration highlights the ongoing efforts to refine and validate the model’s performance across different meteorological contexts. Credit: AXIOS 2024-08-21 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Former President Donald Trump has sharply criticized the nomination of Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential candidate, calling it "not fair" and intensifying his rhetoric amid growing signs that Harris is gaining substantial support in key battleground states. In a fiery post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump accused the Democratic Party of orchestrating "the first ever 'Coup' in America." Trump's frustration follows President Joe Biden's unexpected decision to withdraw from the 2024 race, a move that cleared the path for Harris to become the Democratic nominee. This development has led Trump to assert that he is now facing the unprecedented challenge of running against two opponents: "Crooked Joe Biden" and Harris, whom he labeled a "Radical Left Marxist" and "Comrade." Expressing his belief that the current situation is "not fair," Trump suggested that this could be another form of "Election Interference," echoing his long-standing claims of impropriety in the U.S. electoral process. He particularly voiced his displeasure with the sudden change in his opponent, implying that the Democrats had deliberately orchestrated Biden's withdrawal to strengthen their chances in the election. While Harris remains actively on the campaign trail, preparing to head to Chicago for the Democratic National Convention (DNC) where she will accept her party's nomination, Trump's campaign has expressed confidence in his ability to defeat her. Trump stated, "the good news is that she should be easier to beat than Crooked Joe in that the USA will never allow itself to become a Communist Country." However, recent polling data suggests that the race may be more competitive than Trump's campaign anticipates. A new poll conducted by Focaldata for Semafor shows Harris leading Trump in three critical battleground states. The survey, which took place between August 6 and 16 with 4,854 likely voters across seven competitive states, indicates that Harris is ahead of Trump beyond the margin of error in Michigan (51 to 44 percent), Wisconsin (50 to 44 percent), and Nevada (48 to 44 percent). The poll also shows Harris with narrow leads within the margin of error in Pennsylvania (48 to 47 percent) and North Carolina (47 to 46 percent). Trump maintains a lead beyond the margin of error only in Georgia (49 to 45 percent) and holds a slim advantage in Arizona (46 to 45 percent). These results mark a significant shift from earlier polls that had shown Trump leading in all seven swing states when Biden was still in the race. According to Focaldata's chief researcher, James Kanagasooriam, "The dynamics of the race have been totally upended," adding, "Nobody seems to have locked up Pennsylvania—and if that's the case, come Election Day we will be heading into an election of great uncertainty." Despite the polling data, the Trump campaign remains skeptical. In a recent interview on Fox News, Trump's running mate, Ohio Senator JD Vance, questioned the accuracy of the polls, stating, "First of all, the polls tend to radically overstate Democrats. We certainly saw that during the polling of summer of 2020 and summer of 2016, and of course, a lot of those polls were wrong when we came to Election Day." As the political landscape continues to shift, the Democratic Party is preparing for its nominating convention in Chicago, rallying behind Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. The convention is being held against a backdrop of growing enthusiasm for Harris's candidacy, as reflected in her rising poll numbers and impressive fundraising efforts. In a surprising twist, several prominent Republican figures are expected to attend the DNC, publicly endorsing Harris's bid for the presidency. Adam Kinzinger, a former congressman who represented Illinois's 16th congressional district from 2010 until January 2023, is scheduled to speak on Thursday, the same night Harris will deliver her keynote speech. Kinzinger, a long-time critic of Trump, notably voted to impeach the former president for "incitement of an insurrection" following the January 6 attacks. Last month, Kinzinger wrote that Trump had transformed the GOP into a "cult of personality." Another notable Republican figure, Ana Navarro, a political strategist and co-host of ABC's The View, will host Tuesday night's events. Navarro, who has been a frequent critic of Trump in recent years, explained her support for Harris in a heartfelt Instagram post, drawing from her personal experiences as a refugee who found freedom and opportunity in America. "I'm a little refugee girl who fled communism, who fled Nicaragua at the age of eight, found freedom, found opportunity, found a home in America, and for me to have the chance to stand on that stage and help my girl, Kamala, make history and become the Democratic nominee, it's just such a mind-blowing moment," Navarro shared. The appearance of Kinzinger and Navarro at the DNC comes in the wake of endorsements from other Republican colleagues, including former congresswoman Barbara Comstock. These endorsements from Republican figures align with the Harris campaign's recently launched "Republicans for Harris" initiative, which aims to appeal to Republican voters who "reject the chaos, division, and violence of Donald Trump and his Project 2025 agenda." This bipartisan support may signal a significant shift in the 2024 race, as voters from across the political spectrum rally behind Harris in a bid to prevent another Trump presidency. Credit: Newseek 2024-08-21 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Former President Donald Trump has made headlines once again, claiming that Vice President Kamala Harris has declined an invitation to participate in a Fox News debate scheduled for next month. The Republican nominee for president took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to share the news, writing, “Comrade Kamala Harris has just informed us that she will NOT do the Fox News Debate on September 4th.” The vice president’s reported decision not to engage in the debate did not come as a surprise to Trump. In his post, Trump suggested that Harris’s refusal stemmed from her inability to defend her record on various issues, particularly her stance on fracking and her role as the so-called "Border Czar." Trump expressed his belief that Harris is aware of the difficulties she would face in defending her positions, stating, “I am not surprised by this development because I feel that she knows it is very difficult, at best, for her to defend her record-setting Flip-Flopping on absolutely everything she once believed in, including her statements that THERE WILL BE NO FRACKING IN PENNSYLVANIA and her HORRIBLE Performance on the Border, our ‘Border Czar,’ where millions of criminals and people from mental institutions and terrorists, have been allowed to pour into our Country, totally unchecked and unvetted.” Trump also mentioned that the debate, had it taken place, would have occurred in Pennsylvania, though he offered no further details. The former president has previously stated that he agreed to three debates against Harris, including one hosted by NBC News on September 25, in addition to forums by ABC and Fox News. “So we have those three dates and those networks, they’re very anxiously awaiting that date and those dates,” Trump told reporters during a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate earlier this month. “We have spoken to the heads of the network and it’s all been confirmed.” However, according to Trump’s claims, Harris has only officially committed to participating in the ABC event. She had previously expressed hesitance about the Fox News debate, while appearing more open to the NBC News one. On August 8, Harris responded to inquiries about the debates, saying, “Well, I’m glad that he’s finally agreed to a debate on September 10. I am happy to have that conversation about an additional debate, or after September 10, for sure.” As the situation unfolds, it is important to note that Harris has not held a formal press conference since President Joe Biden’s July 21 decision to withdraw from the re-election race and endorse her as his successor. This decision has placed her at the forefront of the Democratic campaign, with many eyes on her next moves in the race. Trump's allegations of Harris declining the debate have added fuel to the ongoing political drama, intensifying the scrutiny on Harris as she navigates the pressures of a presidential campaign. Whether or not Harris's reported decision will impact her standing in the election remains to be seen, but it has certainly sparked conversation and speculation across the political spectrum. As the debates draw nearer, the nation will be watching closely to see how these dynamics play out and what they might mean for the future of the 2024 presidential race. Credit: NYP 2024-08-21 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

In a profession that demands unwavering impartiality, the police force is increasingly under scrutiny for practices that appear to contradict this principle. Police officers and detectives regularly demonstrate courage in the face of violence and danger, yet the leadership within some police forces seems to be swayed by divisive identity politics, casting doubt on their claims of impartiality. This contradiction raises important questions about the integrity of policing and whether these forces are truly as neutral as they claim to be. While the complexities of police operations, such as handling protests and responding to crime, are beyond the scope of this discussion, the administrative track record of some police forces over the past five years reveals troubling trends. These trends suggest that certain police forces are straying from their core mission of impartial law enforcement. For example, Cheshire Constabulary was found guilty of discrimination not just on the basis of race, but also sexual orientation and gender. The force rejected a prospective officer simply because he was a white heterosexual man. This case highlights the troubling possibility that identity politics may be influencing recruitment decisions within the police force. Similarly, the British Transport Police has been criticized for funding a scholarship that covers the tuition and living costs of a three-year law degree at King's College London. The scholarship, worth £75,000, is exclusively available to individuals of black heritage, with the expectation that they will use their education to "fight injustice." While the intent behind the scholarship may be noble, the exclusionary nature of the criteria raises concerns about fairness and impartiality within the force. In another case, a Metropolitan Police Chief Superintendent in 2022 expressed a desire to establish a charity and employ fundraisers to channel millions of pounds from businesses into minority-owned businesses. This initiative, while perhaps well-intentioned, further underscores the extent to which identity politics is shaping the priorities of some police leaders. Even more recently, Thames Valley Police, often regarded as a progressive force, was found guilty of racial discrimination when it promoted an Asian Sergeant to Detective Inspector without allowing a group of white Inspectors the opportunity to apply. Such instances suggest that these are not isolated incidents but part of a broader trend within policing. Experienced police officers often express frustration at these developments, noting that such occurrences are far from rare. The question arises: are these incidents merely coincidental, or do they reflect a deeper issue within policing—a problematic embrace of divisive identity politics? The decision by the National Police Chiefs' Council and the College of Policing to create a "Police Race Action Plan" in response to the death of George Floyd is another example of this trend. Floyd's death occurred thousands of miles away in a different country, with no direct involvement or connection to British policing. Yet, some of the most progressive and activist officers in the UK seized the moment, viewing it as an "opportunity" to push their agendas. The national director of the Police Race Action Plan, a Commander in the Metropolitan Police, recently struggled to articulate just how significant an "opportunity" Floyd's death and the Black Lives Matter movement presented for policing. This statement is indicative of a broader mindset within some police leadership, where identity politics and social activism are increasingly prioritized over the core responsibilities of law enforcement. Moreover, the creation of separate race action plans by every police force in the country has led to a situation where forces seem to be competing with each other in their commitment to identity politics. This focus diverts valuable time and resources away from the primary duties of fighting crime and protecting the public. It is important to acknowledge that this critique is not a blanket denial of racial or other disparities within policing, the criminal justice system, or society at large. These disparities were thoroughly examined by Labour's David Lammy in 2017. Commissioned by Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron, with the support of Theresa May, Lammy's report demanded that if criminal justice agencies could not "provide an evidence-based explanation for apparent disparities between ethnic groups, then reforms should be introduced." This "explain or reform" approach might seem reasonable at first glance. However, it often leads to a preference for reform over explanation, as reform is the path of least resistance for policymakers and senior leaders. In today's public services, the prevailing attitude seems to be that no one gets called racist for promising reform, even if the underlying issues remain unexamined. The swift and often reflexive dismissal of concerns about "woke" and "two-tier" policing by many police chiefs further suggests that asking them to critically assess, let alone reject, the influence of identity politics within their forces is akin to asking them to act against their own interests. If courageous police chiefs do not soon break ranks and address these issues, it will become increasingly clear that the problems within police leadership are even more severe than previously feared. Addressing these deep-rooted issues may require a complete overhaul of the leadership within the police force. Only by rebuilding the commanding heights of policing can we hope to restore the impartiality and integrity that the public rightly expects from those sworn to protect and serve. The task is daunting, but it is essential if we are to prevent the further erosion of trust in one of the most vital institutions in our society. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-21 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, has stirred controversy once again by falsely implying that pop superstar Taylor Swift has endorsed him. The former president posted a series of images on social media, many of which appear to have been generated using artificial intelligence, depicting Swift and her fans, known as "Swifties," as supporters of his campaign. Accompanying these images, Trump posted the message "I accept!" as though acknowledging Swift's endorsement, despite no such endorsement having been made. The images, which included one showing Swift fans wearing t-shirts that read "Swifties for Trump" and another mimicking a World War I-era U.S. Army recruiting poster with Swift's face replacing Uncle Sam's, were quickly recognized as doctored or satirical. One of the images even bore a label of "satire" with a headline that claimed, "Swifties turning to Trump after ISIS foiled Taylor Swift concert," a reference to a recent security threat that led to the cancellation of three of Swift's concerts in Vienna. Police arrested two individuals suspected of planning attacks inspired by the Islamic State group, though there is no connection between this incident and the Trump campaign. The backlash from Swift's fanbase was swift and severe. Many of her fans accused Trump of spreading misinformation, and they were quick to point out that the singer has never endorsed him. In fact, Taylor Swift has been vocal about her political stance, supporting the Democratic Party in the 2020 election and criticizing Trump during his presidency. Notably, during the nationwide protests following the police murder of George Floyd, Swift took to Twitter, now known as X, to condemn Trump's rhetoric, stating, "After stoking the fires of white supremacy and racism your entire presidency, you have the nerve to feign moral superiority before threatening violence? We will vote you out in November." Despite this, Trump has attempted to present Swift as a supporter, even re-posting photos that NBC News identified as featuring real women who are indeed Trump supporters, though they have no connection to Swift. This move seems to be part of a broader strategy to appeal to younger voters and Swift's massive fanbase. However, the use of misleading and doctored images has only further alienated Swift's followers and drawn attention to the questionable tactics being employed by Trump's campaign. Earlier this year, the BBC uncovered numerous deepfake images portraying Black individuals as Trump supporters, though there was no evidence directly linking these images to Trump's campaign. This pattern of misinformation raises concerns about the ethical boundaries of political campaigning in the digital age, particularly as artificial intelligence becomes more sophisticated and easier to use for deceptive purposes. Taylor Swift, for her part, has not commented on Trump's recent social media posts, but her political leanings remain clear. Having previously endorsed Democratic candidates and spoken out against Trump, it is unlikely that she will lend any support to his 2024 campaign. Instead, this latest incident highlights the growing importance of media literacy and the need for voters to critically evaluate the information they encounter, especially as the use of AI-generated content continues to rise in political discourse. In conclusion, Donald Trump's attempt to falsely imply Taylor Swift's endorsement through the use of doctored images has backfired, leading to a backlash from her fanbase and further damaging his credibility. As the 2024 election approaches, this episode serves as a reminder of the challenges posed by misinformation and the importance of transparency in political communication. Credit: BBC | NYP 2024-08-19 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

The government is urging individuals in possession of zombie-style knives and machetes to hand them in to police stations ahead of an impending ban on these dangerous weapons. The authorities have assured the public that there will be no repercussions for those who surrender these items safely. This initiative is part of a broader effort to combat knife crime and enhance public safety. Zombie-style knives and machetes will be officially added to the list of prohibited dangerous items starting from September 24. This list already includes weapons such as butterfly knives, samurai swords, and push daggers. Although a ban on ninja swords was not included in the recent King's Speech, policing minister Dame Diana Johnson indicated that the government plans to make them illegal in the near future. The initiative is a key component of a larger strategy aimed at reducing knife crime by half within the next decade. Dame Diana Johnson emphasized the urgent need to restrict access to these lethal weapons, stating, "Too many people have access to weapons that can lead to devastating, life-changing consequences. There is no legitimate need for a weapon of this kind to be in our homes or on our streets. That is why we will continue to make sure the tightest restrictions are in place to limit the availability of these lethal weapons." She further explained the significance of the ban on zombie-style knives as part of the government's comprehensive plan to address knife crime. "Implementing a ban on zombie-style knives is just the first step in our ambitious, dedicated plan to halve knife crime within a decade, and will closely be followed by making ninja swords illegal," Dame Diana said. She called on the public to play their part in making communities safer by surrendering these dangerous weapons. "It is absolutely crucial that members of the public come forward and safely hand in these weapons. We are offering people the chance to do the right thing—to help make our streets safer, prevent further loss of life, and save so many futures." The success of this initiative relies on the cooperation of political, policing, and community leaders working together to tackle the knife crime epidemic. Dame Diana highlighted the importance of collective effort in achieving the government's goal: "We cannot do this alone, political, policing, and community leaders must work together to bring the knife crime epidemic to an end and offer a better future for our young people." The weapons surrender scheme is set to run for four weeks, from August 26 to September 23, and will be available at police stations across England and Wales. People in possession of zombie knives, machetes, or other prohibited weapons are encouraged to contact their local police station for advice on how to safely package and surrender these items. In addition to bringing weapons directly to police stations, individuals can also use surrender bins. To find out more about these alternative disposal options, people are advised to contact their local police force, council, or anti-knife crime charities. The government has issued a stern warning that anyone found in possession of a zombie-style knife or machete after the ban comes into effect will face serious legal consequences, including the possibility of a prison sentence. This measure underscores the government's commitment to eradicating knife crime and ensuring that such dangerous weapons are no longer a threat to public safety. Credit: Sky News 2024-08-21 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.