Social Media

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is pursuing arrest warrants for Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the October 7 attacks on Israel and the ensuing conflict in Gaza. This development was revealed by the ICC's chief prosecutor Karim Khan in an exclusive interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. Khan specified that the ICC is also seeking warrants for Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, alongside two other prominent Hamas leaders: Mohammed Diab Ibrahim al-Masri, known as Mohammed Deif, leader of the Al Qassem Brigades, and Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’ political leader. These warrants against Israeli political figures mark an unprecedented move by the ICC, as it targets high-ranking officials from a nation closely allied with the United States. This places Netanyahu alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin, for whom the ICC issued an arrest warrant over the conflict in Ukraine. The charges against Sinwar, Haniyeh, and al-Masri encompass severe allegations including "extermination, murder, taking of hostages, rape, and sexual assault in detention." Khan highlighted the brutality of the October 7 incident, stating, “The world was shocked on the 7th of October when people were ripped from their bedrooms, from their homes, from the different kibbutzim in Israel. People have suffered enormously.” Conversely, Netanyahu and Gallant face accusations of "causing extermination, causing starvation as a method of war, including the denial of humanitarian relief supplies, and deliberately targeting civilians in conflict." Netanyahu has previously condemned the potential issuance of ICC arrest warrants as "an outrage of historic proportions," emphasizing that Israel has a robust independent legal system that thoroughly investigates legal violations. Responding to Netanyahu’s remarks, Khan stated, “Nobody is above the law.” He suggested that Israel, despite its objections to the ICC’s jurisdiction, could challenge the court's decisions legally, “They are free, notwithstanding their objections to jurisdiction, to raise a challenge before the judges of the court and that’s what I advise them to do.” Although neither Israel nor the United States are ICC members, the court claims jurisdiction over Gaza, East Jerusalem, and the West Bank following the Palestinian leaders’ formal acceptance of the court’s jurisdiction in 2015. The pursuit of these high-profile arrest warrants by the ICC underscores the global legal and political complexities surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and highlights the international community's efforts to address severe violations of human rights and humanitarian laws. Credit: CNN 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A link to a website making false claims has been removed. To be clear. Hamas are holding hostages. Israel is not. Any further posts making this claim will be removed.

As mentioned in the OP. New opinion piece on the historical lead up to the illegal invasion of Ukraine by Russia. Understanding Putin’s Motivations Behind the Ukraine Invasion https://aseannow.com/topic/1327637-understanding-putin’s-motivations-behind-the-ukraine-invasion/

In the aftermath of a reported helicopter crash carrying Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, a major search operation is underway in the mountainous region of north-west Iran. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has sought to reassure the public, stating that there will be no disruption in the country’s administration. Despite the challenging weather and heavy fog, over 40 rescue teams equipped with search dogs and drones are actively searching for the crash site. President Raisi had been returning from an area near the Iran-Azerbaijan border after inaugurating two dams with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, who has expressed his concern and offered assistance. The US State Department is closely monitoring the situation. Iranian officials have managed to establish contact with two individuals on the helicopter, suggesting the crash might not have been severe. Signals from the helicopter and a crew member's mobile phone have been detected, aiding the search efforts. However, the harsh weather and difficult terrain are complicating rescue operations, which are ongoing in the early morning hours in the region. The immediate focus remains on the rescue operation, but the incident has broader implications for Iran. Despite the potential crisis, Ayatollah Khamenei’s assurance indicates that the country’s governance will remain stable, with the IRGC and the supreme leader playing crucial roles in maintaining political stability. Economically, the news of the crash has caused a significant drop in the value of the Iranian Rial against the US Dollar, reflecting the incident’s impact on market confidence. Politically, Raisi is seen as a close ally of the supreme leader and a conservative figure, positioning him as a potential successor to Ayatollah Khamenei. Any harm to him could influence future power dynamics within Iran’s leadership. Nevertheless, the structured hierarchy within Iran's political system aims to maintain stability during this critical time, as the country and the world await the outcome of the search and rescue efforts. Credit: BBC & CNN 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Surveillance video from 2016, exclusively obtained by CNN, shows a disturbing altercation between Sean “Diddy” Combs and his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The footage corroborates allegations detailed in a recently settled federal lawsuit filed by Ventura, which accused Combs of severe physical abuse. The Incident Caught on Camera dated March 5, 2016, is sourced from multiple camera angles within the now-closed InterContinental Hotel in Century City, Los Angeles. CNN verified the location using publicly available images of the hotel's interior. In the video, Ventura is seen leaving a hotel room and heading towards the elevators. Combs, clad in a towel, runs down the hallway after her, grabs her by the neck, and throws her to the floor. He then kicks her as she lies motionless. Combs retrieves a purse and suitcase from near the elevators, then kicks Ventura again before dragging her by her sweatshirt toward a room. Ventura eventually stands, gathers her belongings, and attempts to use a phone on the hallway wall. Combs returns, appears to shove her, and then throws an object at her before walking away as an elevator door opens and someone exits. Ventura reached an undisclosed settlement with Combs and declined to comment on the video. Her attorney, Douglas H. Wigdor, stated, "The gut-wrenching video has only further confirmed the disturbing and predatory behavior of Mr. Combs. Words cannot express the courage and fortitude that Ms. Ventura has shown in coming forward to bring this to light." Cassie Ventura, known for her hit song “Me & U,” had an intermittent relationship with Combs from 2007 to 2018. The lawsuit filed in November described a pattern of physical abuse and control by Combs. According to the complaint, Combs assaulted Ventura in March 2016 after becoming intoxicated, giving her a black eye. When Ventura tried to leave the hotel room, Combs followed her, yelled, and threw glass vases at her, causing her to flee to the elevators. The complaint details Ventura's return to the hotel, fearing Combs' wrath, only to be urged by hotel security to leave, as they had witnessed the assault on the security footage. Ventura’s lawsuit also alleged that Combs paid the hotel $50,000 to secure the footage. The lawsuit contained other severe allegations, including rape in 2018 and years of repeated physical and emotional abuse. Ben Brafman, Combs' attorney, denied the allegations in a statement, asserting that the decision to settle the lawsuit did not imply any admission of wrongdoing. "Mr. Combs' decision to settle the lawsuit does not in any way undermine his flat-out denial of the claims. He is happy they got to a mutual settlement and wishes Ms. Ventura the best," Brafman said. Details of the settlement were not disclosed. However, since November, Combs has faced additional civil lawsuits accusing him of various forms of sexual misconduct and illegal activities. He has denied these allegations, and the cases are ongoing. In March, federal authorities searched Combs’ residences in California and Florida as part of a Department of Homeland Security investigation into human trafficking crimes. This investigation is linked to many of the sexual assault allegations in the civil lawsuits. Aaron Dyer, another attorney for Combs, criticized the searches as a "gross overuse of military-level force" and a "witch hunt based on meritless accusations." Diddy apologises Sean "Diddy" Combs has issued an apology for attacking his ex-girlfriend, Cassandra "Cassie" Ventura, after CCTV footage showed him kicking and pushing her in a hotel hallway in 2016. In a video posted on his Instagram, the rapper expressed deep remorse, taking full responsibility for his "inexcusable" actions, which were aired by CNN earlier in the week. "I was disgusted when I did it. I'm disgusted now," Combs stated. He revealed that he sought professional help, including therapy and rehab, and asked for God's mercy and grace. "I’m so sorry," he added, emphasizing his commitment to becoming a better person daily. However, Cassie's lawyers criticized Combs' apology, suggesting it was self-serving. "When Cassie and multiple other women came forward, he denied everything and suggested that his victims were looking for a payday," said lawyer Meredith Firetog. She argued that Combs' apology only came after his repeated denials were proven false, indicating desperation and insincerity. The BBC has not independently verified the video, which appears to be a compilation of surveillance footage dated March 5, 2016. The footage, released by CNN, shows a man identified as Combs pushing Ventura to the floor, kicking her while she is down, attempting to drag her by her shirt, and throwing an object at her. The incident reportedly took place at the now-closed InterContinental Hotel in Century City, Los Angeles. Until now, Combs had not commented on the video. In an earlier statement, Ventura's lawyers said, "The gut-wrenching video has only further confirmed the disturbing and predatory behavior of Mr. Combs." The Los Angeles District Attorney's Office indicated that the alleged assault captured in the video might be too old to prosecute. Combs and Ventura began their relationship when she was 19 and he was 37. Last November, Ventura settled a lawsuit against Combs, accusing him of rape and sexual trafficking over a decade, for an undisclosed sum. Combs' lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, stated at the time that the settlement was "in no way an admission of wrongdoing." Since the settlement, several other women have filed lawsuits against Combs, accusing him of sexual and physical abuse. His homes in Los Angeles and Miami, Florida, were recently raided as part of a federal investigation into human trafficking. Credit: CNN 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The U.S. State Department has issued a warning for U.S. citizens traveling internationally during LGBTQ Pride month in June, urging heightened vigilance due to potential threats from extremist groups. This advisory underscores the need for increased caution at Pride events, which could be targeted by terrorist organizations or extremist actions. The travel advisory, released on Friday, specifically mentions the risk of terror attacks, demonstrations, and other forms of violence aimed at U.S. citizens and interests abroad. The State Department's warning highlights an increased potential for violence inspired by foreign terrorist organizations against LGBTQI+ individuals and events. The advisory urges U.S. travelers to be particularly alert in areas frequented by tourists and LGBTQI+ communities. While the State Department did not cite a specific event or threat, a spokesperson emphasized the importance of providing clear and timely information to help U.S. citizens make informed travel decisions. This travel warning aligns with recent alerts from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which also cautioned against potential threats to Pride month celebrations domestically and internationally. These agencies have noted that foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs) and their supporters might target Pride events, exacerbated by a heightened threat environment in the U.S. and other Western countries. The advisory references previous incidents and threats against LGBTQI+ communities, including: ISIS Messaging: In February 2023, ISIS released anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, denouncing the growth and promotion of LGBTQIA+ communities. Pulse Nightclub Shooting Anniversary: This year marks the eighth anniversary of the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida, where pro-ISIS messaging praised the attack. Vienna Pride Parade Plot: Last June, three alleged ISIS sympathizers were arrested for planning an attack on a Pride parade in Vienna, Austria. Pride celebrations in recent years have increasingly faced threats from far-right extremist groups. Notable incidents include: Kansas Threat: A Kansas man was arrested last year for threatening to bomb a Nashville Pride event. Patriot Front Arrests: In 2022, 31 members of the white supremacist group Patriot Front were arrested near a Pride celebration in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, charged with conspiracy to riot. GLAAD and Anti-Defamation League Reports: Last June, these organizations recorded 145 incidents of LGBTQ-motivated hate and extremism, including the murder of a woman at a Texas gas station by a man who directed a homophobic slur at her. Credit: The Hill 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Since the surprise attack by Hamas on southern Israel on October 7, the conflict between Israel and Hamas has intensified, drawing international attention and intervention. John Spencer, a military expert with 25 years of experience as an infantry soldier and now the Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point, has been closely monitoring the situation. Having embedded with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in Gaza twice over the winter, Spencer offers a unique perspective on the feasibility of Israel defeating Hamas without a ground invasion in Rafah, the southern Gaza city believed to be Hamas' last major stronghold. Spencer's analysis highlights a significant tension between Israel's military capabilities and the constraints imposed by international and, particularly, U.S. pressure. According to Spencer, the IDF possesses the capability to dismantle Hamas' military infrastructure rapidly. However, he believes that international pressure, especially from the U.S., has slowed and limited Israel's military operations, inadvertently increasing Palestinian casualties and suffering by prolonging the conflict. "The fact is that Rafah's where the hostages and remaining Hamas military power and leadership are believed to be," Spencer notes. "Their rockets and weapons production and other capabilities, everything. The IDF would have to go in on the ground because these things are deeply buried underground in the tunnels Hamas has built. If Hamas survives in Rafah, they win." Rafah is strategically significant for several reasons. It is not only a stronghold for Hamas but also a critical point for weapons smuggling across the Egyptian border. Spencer argues that if the IDF does not conduct a ground invasion to root out Hamas' deeply entrenched infrastructure, including extensive tunnel networks, Hamas will continue to pose a significant threat. "If Hamas survives in Rafah, it doesn't matter if they’ve been pushed into the smallest corner of Gaza. If the Hamas leadership survives, they’ve won the war, because they can say they attacked Israel and survived, and then they can rebuild," he explains. Spencer’s perspective is informed by his extensive military experience and his research into urban warfare. He draws parallels with other conflicts to underscore his point. For instance, he compares the situation to the U.S. military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, where quick, overwhelming force was used to dismantle enemy capabilities. The U.S. has been a critical player in this conflict, historically supporting Israel's mission to defeat Hamas. However, according to Spencer, recent U.S. actions suggest a shift. The U.S. has been withholding certain types of arms that Israel might use in Rafah, aiming to prevent a major offensive that would likely result in significant civilian casualties. "The US pressure on Israel has come to a head in Rafah," Spencer observes. This restraint, he argues, could inadvertently lead to a Hamas victory. "War is hell," Spencer affirms, but he notes that war must sometimes be waged decisively to achieve lasting peace. Spencer criticizes the current U.S. approach, suggesting that by slowing down Israel's operations, the international community is inadvertently extending the conflict and increasing civilian suffering. "By taking this approach, the US is inadvertently paving the way for a Hamas victory," he warns. Spencer firmly believes that a ground invasion is necessary for Israel to achieve its goals. He dismisses the notion that a ground invasion would be counterproductive, despite some views from U.S. officials. "As a scholar of urban combat, I strongly disagree with that. The fact is that Rafah's where the hostages and remaining Hamas military power and leadership are believed to be," he insists. Spencer points to the IDF’s successes in other parts of Gaza, such as Northern Gaza, as evidence that ground operations can be effective. "If you’re going to measure whether Israel has had any success in its approach, you measure it against what Hamas was on October 7, not what it is now. The IDF’s approach, in my opinion, has been very effective at destroying Hamas as a military organization," he argues. The international community's concerns about civilian casualties and the ethical conduct of war play a significant role in shaping the conflict. Spencer acknowledges the complexity and the high stakes involved. He points out that Hamas’ tactics of embedding military infrastructure within civilian areas complicate the IDF’s operations and increase the risk of civilian casualties. "Hamas took every law of war and reverse-engineered it to build an environment in which Hamas has occupied facilities because of their legal protections," Spencer explains. He argues that this tactic puts conventional militaries like the IDF at a significant disadvantage, particularly under the scrutiny of the international community. Spencer draws comparisons between the IDF's conduct in Gaza and the U.S. military's operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. He asserts that the IDF has implemented every civilian harm mitigation technique developed over the past 30 years, often going beyond what the U.S. has done. "The US military uses speed, force, and overwhelming power. That’s what we did in Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq," he says. In contrast, international pressure has pushed Israel to adopt a slower, more methodical approach, which Spencer believes has prolonged the conflict and increased destruction. Looking beyond the immediate conflict, Spencer warns of the long-term consequences of allowing Hamas to survive. He suggests that leaving Hamas in power would validate their strategy and embolden other extremist groups. "Hamas will be viewed as the great actor who figured out a way to conduct a massive, brutal attack on Israel, survive, and still achieve political victories," he cautions. Spencer also touches on the potential for creating more militants in the future. He agrees with General David Petraeus that military actions can sometimes radicalize individuals who might join terrorist groups later. However, he emphasizes that in the present, the immediate threat must be neutralized. "Wars create people who aren’t happy if their side loses, and that can actually radicalize them. But in the present when you face an existential threat or a world war, it isn’t a consideration," he asserts. Spencer's analysis presents a stark view of the challenges and necessities of modern warfare against terrorist organizations like Hamas. He firmly believes that a ground invasion in Rafah is essential for Israel to achieve its goals and that international constraints, particularly those from the U.S., have inadvertently prolonged the conflict and increased suffering. In conclusion, Spencer's stance is clear: Israel can defeat Hamas, but it requires decisive, ground-based military action in Rafah. Without this, he argues, the cycle of violence and suffering is likely to continue, with Hamas emerging stronger and more emboldened. Opinion military expert John Spencer Credit: CNN 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

President Joe Biden addressed supporters in Atlanta, delivering a compelling message against his likely opponent in the upcoming presidential election, former President Donald Trump. Speaking at a campaign reception at Mary Mac’s Tea Room, Biden emphasized the stakes of the impending election and urged voters to reject Trump, whom he accused of seeking revenge rather than leadership. "Folks, Trump isn’t running to lead America. He’s running for revenge," Biden declared, according to pool notes. "And look, revenge is no way to lead a country." This pointed remark underscores Biden's framing of the election as a critical juncture for the nation’s future. Biden’s visit to Atlanta coincided with his commencement address at Morehouse College, where he further courted Georgia voters, a crucial demographic that played a significant role in his narrow 2020 victory. Biden lauded The Peach State electorate, attributing his past success to their turnout and expressing confidence that their support would be pivotal again in November. “Tell people that if you doubt the power of the vote, come visit Georgia,” Biden said, per the pool. “What you’ve all done is incredible. You’re the reason — not a joke — Georgia is the reason I’m president of the United States.” Despite his praise and optimism, recent polling data has presented challenges for the Biden campaign. A survey from The New York Times revealed that Biden is currently trailing Trump by 10 points in Georgia, a margin second only to Nevada's 12-point gap among key battleground states. Nevertheless, Biden remained upbeat about his chances. "We feel good about the state of the race," he stated. “There’s a lot to do. We know we’re far from over. But we know the race is close. Polls vary from moving up to down to tied but it’s hard to make any poll rational these days.” This statement reflects Biden's awareness of the fluidity and unpredictability of the race. The president’s speech in Atlanta was not just a critique of Trump but also a call to action, emphasizing the broader implications of the election. He warned that Trump’s return to the Oval Office would endanger democratic principles and individual freedoms. “We cannot let this man become president,” Biden urged. “Our children’s future is at stake. Not a joke. If you’ll allow me to make the case… We have to win this race, not for me but for America.” This appeal highlights Biden’s strategy of framing the election as a battle for the soul of the nation, a continuation of his 2020 campaign theme. Biden’s remarks in Atlanta are part of a broader effort to galvanize his base and reassure supporters amid challenging poll numbers. By highlighting his achievements and contrasting them with Trump's agenda, Biden aims to present himself as the steadier, more future-oriented choice. The president’s focus on Georgia reflects the state’s critical role in the upcoming election. Georgia’s shifting demographics and recent political trends have turned it into a battleground state, making it a focal point for both parties. Biden’s narrow victory in 2020 was largely attributed to high voter turnout, particularly among African American voters, a demographic he is keen to energize again. As the campaign progresses, Biden will likely continue to emphasize themes of stability, progress, and democratic integrity, contrasting these with his portrayal of Trump’s motivations as vindictive and divisive. This narrative is designed to resonate with voters who are wary of a return to the tumultuous Trump years and who value the preservation of democratic norms. Credit: The Hill 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Donald Trump has called for President Joe Biden to undergo a drug test before their first scheduled debate. This demand was made during Trump's speech at the Minnesota Republican Party’s Lincoln Reagan Dinner on Friday. “I’m gonna demand a drug test too, by the way,” Trump declared, drawing attention with his provocative claim. “I am, no I really am. I don’t want him coming in like the State of the Union, he was high as a kite.” Trump has previously accused Biden of being “all jacked up” during his State of the Union address, suggesting that the president was under the influence of drugs. The context of these accusations dates back to Biden's State of the Union address, where Trump and some of his allies have repeatedly claimed that Biden appeared unusually energetic, implying that he might have used performance-enhancing substances. Trump reiterated this stance in a radio interview, asserting that Biden was “higher than a kite” during the speech. As the former president and Biden prepare for two upcoming presidential debates, scheduled for June and September on CNN and ABC respectively, Trump's comments have added a contentious twist to the pre-debate atmosphere. With just over a month before the first debate, the stakes are high, and the rhetoric is heating up. Trump emphasized the need for fairness in the debates during his Minnesota speech. “They gotta be fair, I think they gotta be fair, and if they’re not, you know, you have to deal with it. Right? You have to deal with it,” he said, highlighting his concerns about potential bias and the integrity of the debate process. Adding fuel to the fire, Rep. Greg Murphy (R-N.C.) echoed Trump’s sentiments on Thursday, suggesting that Biden was under the influence during his State of the Union address. “I was in the State of the Union address and Joe Biden must have been jacked up on something that day. I absolutely believe that from a medical viewpoint and actually have a little bit of good knowledge that happened,” Murphy stated. “He can’t stand, and he can’t stand under the lights for that long, and I don’t think he can keep a concept in his brain that long.” These assertions have sparked significant controversy and have been widely discussed in political circles. As of now, no official statement has been made regarding Trump's drug test demand or the allegations of drug use during the State of the Union address. The demand for a drug test is not entirely unprecedented in political history, but it is certainly unusual and adds an unprecedented layer of drama to the upcoming debates. Trump's tactics appear to be aimed at casting doubt on Biden's mental and physical fitness, a strategy he has employed in the past. As the debate dates approach, both candidates are likely to ramp up their preparations and public appearances. Trump's latest demand is likely to be a topic of intense scrutiny and debate among political analysts and the public alike. Whether Biden will agree to such a test remains to be seen, but the request itself has already succeeded in drawing significant media attention and sparking discussions about the candidates' health and fitness for office. Credit: The Hill 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is facing mounting pressure to fulfill his promise of immediate compensation payments totaling up to £10 billion to the victims of the contaminated blood scandal, as the final report on the disaster is set to be published on Monday. Described as the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS, the contaminated blood scandal resulted in more than 3,000 deaths from the 1970s and 1980s due to tainted blood products. The grim legacy continues, with an individual infected during the scandal dying approximately every four days. In 2022, when Hunt was chair of the all-party health select committee, he urged prompt action, stressing the urgency of compensating victims before more lives were lost. As Chancellor, Hunt later acknowledged that compensation costs could be substantial. Now, with a looming £10 billion compensation bill, Hunt faces a significant challenge in balancing this with his goal of delivering pre-election tax cuts. On Monday, Labour will demand immediate and full compensation payments to victims, criticizing the government's prolonged delays. The final report by Sir Brian Langstaff is expected to detail the extensive impact of the scandal, with over 30,000 haemophiliacs or transfusion recipients infected with HIV or hepatitis C, leading to nearly 2,900 deaths by the end of 2019. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is anticipated to offer a formal apology on behalf of successive governments in a statement to the House of Commons early next week. Labour’s shadow minister without portfolio, Nick Thomas-Symonds, emphasized the urgency of addressing the victims' long wait for justice: “Victims have waited far too long for a proper apology and final compensation scheme. They should wait no longer.” In July 2022, Langstaff urged for immediate compensation, advocating for payments of no less than £100,000 to infected individuals and their bereaved partners. Despite these recommendations, significant interim payments have yet to be made. Diana Johnson, Labour MP and chair of the all-party parliamentary group on haemophilia and contaminated blood, has been a relentless advocate for the victims. She insists, “Compensation should be paid as quickly as possible by this government. We cannot wait for any future government to do the right thing, when we know one person still dies on average every three and a half days from the scandal.” Johnson also criticized the government’s inaction on making further interim payments to children who lost parents and parents who lost children, as recommended by Sir Brian in April 2023. Former health secretary and current Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, highlighted the scandal as indicative of a broader systemic failure within Whitehall. He condemned the longstanding refusal of civil servants to acknowledge the dangers of contaminated blood despite clear evidence, suggesting this was influenced by the Treasury's early stance against admitting liability. Burnham drew parallels to other major scandals, such as Hillsborough and the Post Office scandal, criticizing the unethical denial of reality and the abandonment of victims. Burnham stated emphatically, “Full compensation had to be paid out immediately. Anything else would be reprehensible and immoral.” The publication of the inquiry's final report marks a critical moment for the thousands affected by the scandal. As Hunt contemplates the financial implications amidst political and public pressure, the government's response will be closely watched. Immediate and full compensation is seen by many as not only a financial obligation but a moral imperative to rectify decades of injustice and suffering endured by the victims of this tragic episode in NHS history. Credit: The Guardian 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Three high-ranking Syrian officials are set to be tried in absentia in Paris for their roles in the arrest, torture, and deaths of Franco-Syrian student Patrick Dabbagh and his father Mazzen Dabbagh. This landmark case marks the first time senior figures close to President Bashar al-Assad are being held accountable for crimes against humanity and war crimes, potentially paving the way for further prosecutions. In the early hours of November 3, 2013, five Syrian officials, including representatives from the Syrian air force’s intelligence unit, forcibly took Patrick Dabbagh from his home in the Mezzeh district of Damascus. The following night, the same officials returned with a dozen soldiers to arrest Patrick’s father, Mazzen, a 48-year-old education counsellor at the city's French lycée. Accusing Mazzen of failing to raise his son properly, they ominously stated, "We’ll teach you to educate him," but gave no specific reasons for the arrests. For nearly five years, the family heard nothing about the fate of Patrick and Mazzen until July 2018, when they received certificates stating that Patrick had died in January 2014 and Mazzen in November 2017. No cause of death was given, and the bodies were not returned to the family. This Tuesday, Ali Mamlouk, 78, head of the Syrian secret services and security adviser to Assad; Jamil Hassan, 72, former head of the Syrian air force intelligence unit; and Abdel Salam Mahmoud, intelligence director at the notorious Mezzeh detention center, will face trial for their alleged complicity in the crimes against the Dabbaghs. The trial is unprecedented as it targets some of the most senior officers from the Syrian regime. French lawyer Clémence Bectarte, representing the Dabbagh family, emphasized the trial's significance: "It’s important not only for the Dabbagh family but for many other Syrians. There are families of people who have disappeared who are still waiting for news of their loved ones or the bodies of those who have been killed." The Syrian conflict, which began with pro-democracy protests in 2011, has since claimed more than 230,000 civilian lives, including 30,000 children, according to the Syrian Network for Human Rights. The Syrian intelligence services are believed to have tortured to death over 15,000 individuals. Despite this, Assad has been reintegrated into the Arab diplomatic fold over the past year, attending Arab League summits and meetings with regional leaders. The Paris trial underscores the growing resolve among European nations to pursue justice for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide under the principle of universal jurisdiction. This legal doctrine permits countries to prosecute perpetrators regardless of their nationality or where the crimes occurred. Last November, France issued an international arrest warrant for Assad over the use of chemical weapons against civilians. This was a historic move, as it marked the first time a sitting head of state was subject to an arrest warrant in a third country for crimes against humanity. France's investigation into the Dabbagh case involved testimonies from over 20 Syrians, many of whom survived Mezzeh prison and detailed the horrific conditions and command structure during the father and son's detention. Bectarte noted the importance of these testimonies: "The trial would not be possible without their testimony of the terrible reality of the crimes committed in the jails of Bashar al-Assad." The establishment of France's war crimes unit in 2012 has been instrumental in bringing such cases to court. Although universal jurisdiction had previously been limited by the need for a tangible connection to France, this case demonstrates the evolving landscape of international justice. Bectarte emphasized the trial's role in the broader fight against impunity: "At a time when the Syrian regime seems to come out unpunished for all the atrocities committed, it is essential that this trial qualifies the regime’s crimes and hold accountable its highest officials. The goal is there should be no escape from justice. This will not be the last trial." Mazen Darwish, of the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression, highlighted the broader impact: "Beyond Mazzen and Patrick Dabbagh, there are hundreds of thousands of Syrian men and women who have died during the Syrian conflict, especially at the hands of Bashar al-Assad’s regime and whose families are still waiting for justice." As the trial commences, it represents a critical step toward accountability for the Syrian regime’s atrocities. The outcome may influence future prosecutions and reinforce the global commitment to justice for victims of the Syrian conflict and other human rights violations. Credit: The Guardian 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a recent Q&A with Penn Today, Michael C. Horowitz, director of Perry World House and the Richard Perry Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, provides deep insights into Russian President Vladimir Putin’s motivations behind the large-scale attack on Ukraine. This aggressive move has not only shattered peace in Europe but also sparked global condemnation and severe sanctions. Horowitz, an expert on international politics and military power, sheds light on Putin's expansionist views, the timing of the invasion, and the implications of his nuclear threats. Why Invade Ukraine Now? When questioned about the timing of the invasion, Horowitz asserts that the crisis is a product of Putin’s own making. The Biden administration’s information indicates that Putin meticulously engineered the situation to justify Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The specific timing, however, seems influenced by practical considerations: the winter weather in Ukraine, which is favorable for military operations involving tracked vehicles like tanks, and the conclusion of the Olympics, ensuring that the invasion does not overshadow China’s event. The Threat of an Independent Ukraine Horowitz emphasizes that Putin perceives an independent, democratic Ukraine as a significant threat to his regime and to Russia. Putin’s decision to counter this perceived threat with overwhelming military force stems from his belief that Ukraine's democratic evolution could inspire similar movements within Russia, undermining his autocratic rule. This view aligns with Putin’s broader disdain for the post-Soviet order and his desire to restore Russia’s influence to what he perceives as its former glory during the Soviet era. Expansionist Goals and Soviet Nostalgia Putin’s ambitions extend beyond Ukraine. Horowitz notes that Putin harbors maximalist goals of reestablishing Russia’s status akin to its Cold War power. In a recent speech to his National Security Council, Putin suggested that all post-Soviet states should be considered part of Russia, indicating his broader territorial ambitions. This rhetoric and action reveal a desire to not only reclaim lost influence but also to secure his legacy as the leader who restored Russia’s might. Nuclear Threats and NATO’s Role The nuclear threat posed by Putin is a critical concern. Horowitz explains that while the Biden administration has ruled out direct military intervention in Ukraine, Putin’s implied nuclear threats are consistent with Russia’s strategic doctrine. Russia views its nuclear arsenal as a counterbalance to its conventional military inferiority compared to NATO and the United States. Thus, in a direct conflict with NATO, Russia might resort to nuclear weapons to avoid losing a conventional war. However, in the Ukraine context, the nuclear threat is primarily a deterrent against external intervention. Visuals of War and Historical Parallels The invasion’s visuals, reminiscent of past European wars, are startling. Horowitz highlights that this is the largest land invasion in Europe since World War II, underscoring its potential scale and impact. While war has persisted globally, large-scale territorial conquests have diminished over the past 75 years. The invasion of Ukraine represents a stark return to such aggression, driven by a combination of Russian weakness and ambition. Predicting Future Developments The future of the conflict remains uncertain. Horowitz outlines possible scenarios: Putin might attempt to consolidate control over the entire country, facing inevitable insurgencies, or install a puppet government, withdrawing forces to eastern provinces. Both strategies would likely encounter significant resistance from Ukrainians determined to reclaim their sovereignty. The Role of Leadership in International Politics Horowitz stresses the importance of leadership in international politics, particularly in autocratic regimes like Russia. Putin’s personal control over the Russian political system means that his whims heavily influence Russian foreign policy. Unlike democratic leaders, who are often constrained by political checks and balances, autocratic leaders like Putin can act unilaterally, leading to unpredictable and rapid developments in international crises. The Efficacy of Sanctions and International Response The effectiveness of sanctions in deterring Russia’s actions depends on multiple factors, including the severity of sanctions and the global community’s ability to reduce reliance on Russian resources. Although the Russian economy is suffering, Putin appears indifferent to the resulting hardships faced by Russian citizens. He likely hopes that Western resolve will wane before the economic pain forces him to reconsider his strategy. However, Horowitz believes this is a miscalculation, as the international community remains committed to supporting Ukraine and punishing Russian aggression. The Crucial Takeaway Ultimately, Horowitz urges people to recognize the gravity of the situation: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is driven by Putin’s desire to expand Russian influence and power. While various explanations exist for Putin’s actions, the responsibility for the invasion rests squarely on his shoulders. The crisis, manufactured by Putin, has catastrophic implications for countless individuals, highlighting the dire need for a robust international response. In summary, Michael C. Horowitz provides a comprehensive analysis of Vladimir Putin’s motivations behind the Ukraine invasion. Putin’s actions, rooted in a desire to reassert Russian dominance and counter perceived threats from a democratic Ukraine, have led to one of the most significant conflicts in Europe since World War II. As the world watches, the international community must navigate the complex dynamics of sanctions, military strategy, and diplomatic efforts to address this unprecedented crisis. Credit: Penn Today 2024-05-20 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Unapproved social media links and a post against the forums community standards have been removed.

There is a recent dedicated topic to Casually figures here: UN Cuts Death of Women and Children in Gaza by Half https://aseannow.com/topic/1327151-un-cuts-death-of-women-and-children-in-gaza-by-half/ If you want to carry on that discussion then I suggest you do so there.

Once again, remain on topic when discussing the "Latest developments and discussion of events in the Israel-Hamas War." Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source. Don't be surprised to find your post disappear if you do not. An inflammatory post has also been removed. There are dozens of other topics on the war including historical perspectives here: https://aseannow.com/forum/432-the-war-in-israel/

Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have recovered the bodies of three hostages from the Gaza Strip. The hostages, identified as Itzhak Gelerenter, Amit Buskila, and Shani Louk, were among those abducted during the brutal attack by Hamas on October 7 at the Supernova music festival near Re’im. The operation, carried out by the IDF and Shin Bet, underscores the complexities and ongoing efforts in the conflict to rescue hostages and bring closure to their families. On October 7, Hamas launched a devastating assault on the Supernova music festival near Re’im. The attack, which resulted in numerous casualties and abductions, shocked the international community and highlighted the volatile situation in the region. Gelerenter, Buskila, and Louk were among the festival-goers who managed to flee the initial assault, seeking refuge in the nearby Mefalsim area. Tragically, they were captured and killed by Hamas terrorists, and their bodies were taken to Gaza. The recovery of the hostages' bodies was announced by IDF Spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, who detailed the overnight operation. "The bodies were recovered in an overnight operation carried out by the military and Shin Bet," Hagari stated. This operation, which involved significant intelligence and ground efforts, was part of a broader campaign by the IDF to locate and retrieve hostages taken during the October 7 attack. For the families of Itzhak Gelerenter, Amit Buskila, and Shani Louk, the news of the recovery brought a mix of relief and renewed grief. Until recently, Gelerenter and Buskila were presumed alive, fostering a glimmer of hope among their loved ones. Shani Louk's death had been confirmed earlier when a fragment of her skull was identified, a discovery that was widely reported due to the harrowing footage of her abduction. Shani Louk’s father, Nissim, expressed his complex emotions in an interview with Channel 12 news. "The announcement that the IDF recovered her body was difficult to receive, but it was news that we had been waiting for," he said, acknowledging the confirmation he received more than six months ago about her death. Nissim praised the “brave soldiers” who retrieved his daughter’s body, a sentiment echoed by the other families involved. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog both issued statements of condolence and support for the families. Netanyahu described the news as heartbreaking and vowed to continue efforts to bring back all remaining hostages. "We will return all of our hostages — living and deceased alike," he declared. Herzog similarly stressed the national commitment to the safe return of all hostages, praising the bravery and determination of the IDF forces involved in the recovery operation. The recovery of the bodies highlights the intense and ongoing conflict in Gaza, where the IDF continues to engage in fierce battles with Hamas. The military’s efforts to recover hostages are complicated by the dangerous and volatile environment, requiring precise intelligence and coordinated operations. It said it had acted on intelligence gleaned from "interrogations of terrorists" who had been detained in Gaza. Rear Adm. Hagari urged the public to refrain from spreading rumors and to rely on official statements to maintain operational security. "I call on the public — please refrain from spreading rumors and maintain the security of our forces. Keep our forces safe. Listen to the messages of the IDF spokesperson and the official bodies only," he emphasized. The situation remains dire for many other families, with approximately 125 hostages still believed to be in Gaza. While some have been released or rescued, the fate of many remains uncertain. The IDF has confirmed the deaths of 37 hostages based on new intelligence and findings from ongoing operations in Gaza. The recovery efforts are further complicated by the presence of Hamas-held bodies of fallen IDF soldiers and civilians, some of whom have been in captivity since 2014. Credit: Times of Israel | X | BBC 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently launched a wastewater tracking dashboard to monitor the spread of bird flu, or H5N1, which has now been detected in cattle across nine states. Over 40 cattle herds have confirmed cases of this virus, raising concerns about its potential impact on both animal and human health. Tracking the Virus The new CDC dashboard will track all influenza A viruses from 600 wastewater treatment sites nationwide. This effort aims to help public health officials identify areas where the virus is most aggressively spreading. During the summer months, flu viruses typically circulate at very low levels, so higher-than-average levels of influenza A in wastewater can indicate unusual activity. Data from 189 sampling sites, including those in Illinois and Alaska, have shown higher-than-average levels of an influenza A virus as of May 4. What is Bird Flu? Avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu, is an infection caused by influenza viruses that primarily spread in birds but can infect other animals and humans. According to the Cleveland Clinic, humans can contract bird flu through contact with infected animals' body fluids, such as saliva, respiratory droplets, or feces. It can also be transmitted if humans inhale dust particles in animal habitats or touch contaminated surfaces and then touch their eyes, nose, or mouth. Those working closely with poultry, waterfowl, and livestock are at the highest risk of infection. Spread to Cattle The recent spread of bird flu to cattle has puzzled researchers. Jenna Guthmiller, an assistant professor of immunology and microbiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, suggests that milking machines may have carried the virus. High levels of the virus have been found in the udders of infected cows, indicating that the infection is mainly restricted to dairy cows. "Influenza A has never been recorded like this in cows before. There’s the occasional cow infected, but they are not a natural host for influenza A viruses, so this is really quite shocking to the field," Guthmiller said. Outbreak Locations Bird flu has been detected in cattle herds across nine states: Michigan, New Mexico, North Carolina, Kansas, Colorado, Idaho, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas. In Texas, researchers at Stanford University and Emory University found high amounts of bird flu viral RNA in archived wastewater samples from three sites, indicating the virus's presence since late February, before the first confirmed case in cattle. Human Impact and Concerns Despite the spread in cattle, the risk to humans remains low. Only one confirmed human case of bird flu has been reported this year, involving a person in Texas who had direct exposure to infected dairy cattle and experienced only mild symptoms. The CDC is monitoring 260 people who have been exposed to infected dairy cows, with 33 individuals tested for the virus. "Right now, the H5N1 bird flu situation remains primarily an animal health issue. However, the CDC is watching this situation closely and taking routine preparedness and prevention measures in case this virus changes to pose a greater human health risk," the CDC stated. Symptoms of Bird Flu in Humans The symptoms of bird flu in humans can range from mild to severe, including eye redness, flu-like symptoms, pneumonia, high fever, cough, sore throat, runny or stuffy nose, muscle or body aches, headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath. Less common symptoms can include diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, or seizures. Food Safety Concerns Bird flu has been found in high levels in the raw, unpasteurized milk of infected cows. The CDC warns that consuming raw milk could theoretically lead to infection if the virus contacts receptors in the nose, mouth, and throat, or if inhaled into the lungs. Both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the CDC consider raw milk a risky food due to potential contamination with harmful germs. Despite these warnings, sales of raw milk have increased since the virus was confirmed in cattle. However, pasteurized milk and properly cooked poultry and eggs are considered safe to consume. The FDA assures that the pasteurization process kills the virus, and the likelihood of infected poultry or eggs entering the food supply is very low due to USDA safeguards, including testing and inspection programs. While the spread of bird flu to cattle is concerning and warrants close monitoring, the risk to the general public remains low. The CDC and other health agencies are taking preventive measures and monitoring the situation closely. By following safety guidelines and consuming properly prepared food, the public can minimize their risk of infection. Credit: The Hill 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is under scrutiny for the alleged misuse of federal grant funds. This investigation, spearheaded by two Republican senators, Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, marks the second congressional inquiry into Willis's office this year. Allegations and Whistleblower Claims The accusations stem from a whistleblower, former Willis staffer Amanda Timpson, who claims that Willis misappropriated a federal grant of $488,000. According to Timpson, the funds, intended for establishing a youth gang prevention center, were instead used for purchasing computers and other expenses not covered by the grant. Timpson alleges that the promised youth gang prevention center never materialized. Congressional Inquiries In February, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, launched the first investigation into these allegations. The recent probe by Senators Grassley and Johnson follows a similar trajectory, intensifying the scrutiny on Willis's office. In a letter dated May 15, Grassley and Johnson demanded detailed information about all federal grants received by the Fulton County district attorney's office since fiscal year 2019. They also requested a comprehensive accounting of all expenditures for each grant and records related to the planned expenditures. Statements from Senators Senator Grassley emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the use of federal funds. "Congress has the right to know where federal tax dollars are sent and how they're spent. These federal funds were intended to help vulnerable youth and support important law enforcement initiatives, but the Fulton County DA's office appears to have used them to fulfill their own whims. Any official who squanders taxpayer funds should be held accountable," Grassley was quoted as saying. Senator Johnson echoed these sentiments, stressing the need for full transparency from District Attorney Willis. Context and Implications Fani Willis, currently overseeing the high-profile racketeering case against former President Donald Trump and several co-defendants related to attempts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia, has faced numerous challenges. She has been under fire for months following the revelation of a romantic relationship with a deputy hired to work on the Trump case. Although she has survived calls for her disqualification, a recent appeals court decision allowed Trump's lawyers to challenge the order keeping her on the election interference case, leaving the possibility of her removal from the case open. The ongoing investigations into the alleged misuse of federal funds by Fani Willis's office underscore the broader issues of transparency and accountability in the use of taxpayer money. With the pressure mounting from multiple congressional inquiries, the outcome of these investigations could have significant repercussions for Willis's career and the high-stakes cases she is currently handling. Credit: Newsweek 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In an unprecedented move, the United Nations Security Council convened a meeting solely focused on the hostages taken by Hamas during the October 7 attack in Israel. This informal gathering, initiated by the United States, aimed to address the grave issue of mass hostage-taking by Hamas, condemning it as a psychological tool of terrorism. The session included testimonies from former hostages and bereaved family members, highlighting the severe human impact of these actions. In three previously announced resolutions, the UN Security Council has called for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Testimonies of Hostage Survivors Shoshan Haran, who was taken hostage along with her daughter and two grandchildren, shared harrowing details of their 50-day captivity. Haran recounted the trauma experienced by her three-year-old granddaughter, Yahel, who now whispers, hides, wets the bed, and suffers from nightmares. "Three weeks after we were released, Yahel only whispers, too afraid to make a noise. She hid from everyone, too afraid to go outside. She wet the bed and had nightmares, too afraid she may be captured again," Haran revealed. Other poignant testimonies came from Ayelet Samerano, whose son was killed and his body taken by Hamas, and Gili Roman, whose sister was taken hostage and released in a truce deal. These stories underscored the severe psychological and emotional toll of the hostages' ordeal. International Condemnation and Demands The meeting, which focused on condemning the mass hostage-taking as an unprecedented form of terrorism, saw strong statements from various international representatives. US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield emphasized the United States' unwavering stance: "Taking hostages is cowardly – a cowardly tactic designed to instill fear, manipulate governments, and advance nefarious agendas. It violates basic principles of humanity." Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield also highlighted the international community's call for the immediate release of the hostages, stressing that President Joe Biden is deeply committed to this cause. "This is a responsibility that President Biden feels, to his core, and he’s committed to seeing through," she stated. Remarks by Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield Bring home every single hostage from more than 20 countries, who have been held against their will in Gaza since October 7, when Hamas murdered over 1,200 people, raped and maimed hundreds more, including the bodies of the dead, and abducted over 240 people, including women, children, and the elderly. This includes six U.S. citizens who are still being held hostage: Edan Alexander; Itai Chen; Sagui Dekel-Chen; Omer Neutra; Keith Siegal; and Hersh Goldberg-Polin. So today, let us again demand Hamas release all remaining hostages. Doing so would also open the door to ending this conflict. It would bring about an immediate and prolonged ceasefire, which would facilitate a surge of desperately needed humanitarian assistance to Gaza, and lead to the durable end of hostilities. Civilians in Gaza would be able to return to their homes and their lands with preparations beforehand to ensure shelter and humanitarian provisions. To put it simply: It would save lives on all sides. The only – the only thing standing in the way of all of this is Hamas. Hamas could stop fighting today by releasing the first hostage. Today. And so, we must demand Hamas take the deal on the table. Every single Member State has an obligation to speak out. Statement by UK Ambassador James Kariuki After 222 days in captivity, 134 hostages remain in Gaza, including British nationals and others with strong UK links. We are extremely concerned about the reports that many of them are believed to be very ill or deceased. The UK is clear: we call for the immediate, unconditional release of all hostages in Gaza held by Hamas and other groups. Hostage-taking is unlawful and poses a clear threat to international peace and security. Reactions and Criticisms While there was unanimous condemnation of hostage-taking, the meeting also saw criticisms of Israel's military actions in Gaza. Representatives from Russia, China, Algeria, and other countries voiced concerns over Israel's offensive, which, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, has resulted in over 35,000 Palestinian deaths. These figures, however, are unverified and do not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Algerian diplomat Ahmed Sahraoui condemned Israel's actions, describing them as a "barbaric killing machine" wreaking havoc in Gaza under the guise of rescuing hostages. Russian diplomat Georgiy Barsukov echoed these sentiments, accusing the US of ignoring the broader context of alleged genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. Calls for Action Israel's UN Ambassador Gilad Erdan highlighted the urgent need for the Security Council to prioritize the hostage crisis. "The hostages are the most urgent and critical humanitarian issue that the council must focus on," Erdan asserted. He criticized the UN for its inaction, asking, "Has the council condemned Hamas and demanded they permit the Red Cross to check on the hostages? Have you imposed sanctions on Hamas leadership until they release the hostages? What action has been taken?" Erdan emphasized the brutal conditions faced by the hostages, including beatings, torture, and rape, urging the international community to take decisive steps to secure their release. The UN Security Council's meeting marked a significant step in addressing the severe humanitarian issue of hostages taken by Hamas. The testimonies and international condemnations underscored the urgency of the situation, calling for immediate and decisive action to ensure the release of the hostages and to prevent the normalization of such acts of terrorism. Full Video of meeting: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1m/k1mwh7bdq3 Credit: Times of Israel 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

President Joe Biden invoked executive privilege to keep the recording of his deposition about storing classified documents confidential. This move comes as House Republicans push to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt for refusing to release the recording. Meanwhile the House Judiciary and Oversight committees have scheduled votes on contempt resolutions against Garland, arguing that the recording is crucial for understanding Special Counsel Robert Hur's decision not to charge Biden. The Justice Department has released a transcript of the deposition but argues that releasing the recording could jeopardize future criminal investigations. Associate Attorney General Carlos Uriarte confirmed that the Office of Legal Counsel determined the recording falls under executive privilege. Garland stated that the contempt threat is part of "unprecedented and unfounded attacks" on the Justice Department. He emphasized that the department has gone to great lengths to respond to legitimate congressional requests but insists that releasing the recording would harm future investigations. However the House Republicans, led by Speaker Mike Johnson and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, argue that the recording is necessary to assess Biden's mental state and the legitimacy of Hur's decision. They accuse the White House of attempting to hide the president's condition from the public. Investigation Background Biden's personal lawyers found classified documents at his Penn Biden Center office. Additional documents were later found at his Wilmington home. Unlike former President Donald Trump, Biden voluntarily returned the documents and cooperated with authorities. Special Counsel Robert Hur interviewed Biden and ultimately decided not to charge him. However, Hur described Biden as a "sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," a characterization Biden disputes. Political Implications The contempt resolutions are part of a broader effort by House Republicans to scrutinize Biden and Garland, with potential impeachment proceedings on the horizon. However, the success of these resolutions in the full House is uncertain due to the slim Republican majority and some moderate GOP lawmakers' reluctance to engage in partisan battles with the Justice Department. Democrats, including Rep. Jerrold Nadler and Rep. Hank Johnson, argue that the committees' actions are politically motivated and a waste of time, noting that the Justice Department has already complied significantly with congressional requests. Executive Privilege in Context Invoking executive privilege is relatively rare and typically occurs during significant congressional investigations. Past presidents, including George Washington, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, have invoked it in various contexts to protect sensitive information. Biden's invocation of executive privilege is aimed at preventing potential misuse of the recording for partisan purposes. White House Counsel Edward Siskel accused Republicans of intending to distort the audio recordings for political gain. The Justice Department maintains that producing the recording could impede future investigations by chilling cooperation from witnesses and targets. If the contempt resolutions pass the committees and are approved by the full House, it remains to be seen whether the Justice Department will act on them, given its past rejections of similar recommendations. Credit: USA TODAY 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Harris Wolobah, a 10th-grade student from Worcester, Massachusetts, died on September 1, 2023, after participating in the "One Chip Challenge," a social media trend involving consuming a highly spicy tortilla chip. The challenge, promoted by Paqui, a Texas-based subsidiary of the Hershey Co, involves eating a single chip coated with an intense chile pepper extract. The autopsy revealed that Harris Wolobah died of cardiopulmonary arrest triggered by the ingestion of food with a high capsaicin concentration. Capsaicin is the active component in chile peppers that gives them their heat. The autopsy also noted Harris had pre-existing heart conditions, including cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart) and a congenital defect called myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery. This condition can lead to abnormal blood flow and potentially severe heart arrhythmias when the heart is under significant stress, such as from ingesting large amounts of capsaicin. Medical experts explained that while Harris's heart defect made him particularly vulnerable, ingesting large amounts of capsaicin can pose serious risks even to those without underlying heart conditions. Dr. James Udelson, Chief of Cardiology at Tufts Medical Center, and Dr. Syed Haider, a cardiologist at MedStar Washington Hospital Center, both emphasized that significant capsaicin intake can increase heart activity, potentially leading to ischemia (reduced blood flow) and severe arrhythmias. The Paqui chip involved in the challenge is sold individually in a coffin-shaped box with clear warnings about its intense heat and potential risks. Despite warnings that the chip was intended for adults and not for those sensitive to spicy foods or with underlying health conditions, children have easily obtained the product, leading to numerous reports of illness. In response to Harris's death and other incidents, Paqui has discontinued the product and worked with retailers to remove it from shelves. The challenge, which gained popularity through social media, has led to various adverse health events among teenagers across the United States. This phenomenon is part of a larger trend of extreme spicy food challenges driven by the quest for internet fame. Such challenges have prompted warnings from poison control centers and health authorities about the potential for severe allergic reactions, breathing difficulties, irregular heartbeats, heart attacks, and strokes. Harris Wolobah's tragic death underscores the dangers of extreme spicy food challenges and highlights the need for increased awareness and caution regarding such viral trends. Authorities and health professionals continue to warn against the consumption of excessively spicy foods, especially for individuals with underlying health conditions. Credit: The Guardian 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a controversial bill on Wednesday that removes requirements for the state to consider climate change when crafting energy policies. The law also eliminates nearly all references to climate change from Florida's statutes. Key provisions of the law, set to take effect in July, include: 1. Prohibition of Offshore Wind Turbines: The law bans the installation of offshore wind turbines within Florida waters or within one mile of the state's coastline, despite no existing offshore wind facilities in the state. 2. Streamlining Natural Gas Pipeline Approvals: The legislation removes certain regulatory barriers, facilitating the approval process for natural gas pipelines. 3. Elimination of Renewable Energy Goals: It strips state officials of the authority to set renewable energy goals, effectively halting progress towards cleaner energy alternatives. Governor DeSantis defended the legislation in a social media post, framing it as a rejection of what he termed the "radical green zealots" and an effort to restore rationality to Florida’s energy policies. Environmental leaders have sharply criticized the new law, arguing that it disregards the significant environmental challenges facing Florida. Yoca Arditi-Rocha, executive director at the CLEO Institute, highlighted the various environmental threats Floridians face, including: Rising Sea Levels: As a state with extensive coastlines, Florida is particularly vulnerable to sea-level rise. Extreme Heat: Increasing temperatures pose health risks and exacerbate existing environmental issues. High Property Insurance Costs: The state has seen a mass exodus of insurers, many citing high catastrophe costs associated with climate change. Frequent Flooding and Severe Storms: Climate change is contributing to more frequent and severe weather events. Arditi-Rocha emphasized that the removal of statutory language acknowledging these threats undermines efforts to protect Floridians and appears to prioritize fossil fuel industry profits over public interest. The bill's passage comes after Florida recorded its warmest year since 1895 in 2023, with an average annual temperature of 73.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The state has also experienced significant insurance market disruptions, driven by a combination of increasing natural disaster costs, litigation, and fraud. Governor DeSantis has a history of contentious interactions with environmental advocates and has taken a combative stance against Biden administration environmental policies during his 2024 presidential campaign. Despite his opposition to federal climate policies, DeSantis has previously opposed offshore drilling and fracking in Florida, citing risks to the state's environment. In another recent move, DeSantis signed legislation preventing local governments from establishing their own heat protections for outdoor workers, further fueling debates over his administration's approach to environmental and worker safety issues. DeSantis’s newly signed legislation represents a significant shift in Florida’s energy policy, removing climate change considerations and easing regulatory hurdles for fossil fuel projects. While proponents argue it will restore practical energy policy, critics contend it neglects the pressing environmental challenges facing the state and favors industry profits over public welfare. As Florida grapples with the impacts of climate change, the implications of this legislative change will likely continue to spark debate and influence the state's future policy directions. Credit: The Hill 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Police successfully reclaimed a lecture hall at the University of California, Irvine (UC Irvine) from pro-Palestinian protesters who had occupied the building for hours. Law enforcement also cleared a student encampment that had been in place for over two weeks. This protest was part of a broader movement across U.S. campuses in response to the ongoing war in Gaza, with activists calling for a ceasefire, the protection of civilian lives, and university divestment from Israeli interests. UC Irvine officials had requested police intervention after declaring the occupation a "violent protest." Officers from about ten nearby law enforcement agencies converged on the campus, equipped in riot gear, and formed barricades while issuing warnings to protesters. Within four hours, police had removed the protesters from the lecture hall and the adjacent plaza. The university reported a minimal number of arrests and described the protesters as "begrudgingly cooperative." Chancellor Howard Gillman expressed regret over the necessity of police involvement, emphasizing that the university had attempted to manage the situation without escalation. He stated that the university had been in talks with the protesters but failed to reach a compromise on an alternative, non-disruptive protest site. Gillman highlighted the university's commitment to enforcing regulations against illegal encampments and reiterated the institution’s stance against divesting from Israel. "Encampment protesters have focused most of their demands on actions that would require the university to violate the academic freedom rights of faculty, the free speech rights of faculty and fellow students, and the civil rights of many of our Jewish students," Gillman said. Protesters had set up an encampment adjacent to the lecture hall on April 29, and on May 15, between 200 to 300 protesters took over the lecture hall during a period when no classes were in session. Police used a loudspeaker to declare the gathering an unlawful assembly, warning of potential arrests. Officers formed lines and gradually pushed protesters back before making arrests and clearing the plaza. Protesters chanted, banged drums, and displayed banners, including one renaming the building "Alex Odeh Hall" in honor of a Palestinian activist killed in 1985. The University of California system has maintained its position on not divesting from Israeli interests, citing concerns over academic freedom, free speech, and civil rights. While the university managed to regain control of its facilities, the event highlights the challenges institutions face in balancing protest rights with campus regulations and safety concerns. Credit: Reuters 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Ahmed Ali Alid, a 45-year-old Moroccan asylum-seeker, has been sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 44 years for the murder of Terence Carney, a 70-year-old grandfather. Alid's attack, driven by motivations linked to the Gaza conflict, also included an attempted murder and assaults on police officers. On October 15, Alid, who had previously claimed asylum in the UK, prowled the streets of Hartlepool with the intent to kill. His first victim was his housemate, Javed Nouri, a 31-year-old Iranian asylum seeker and Christian convert. Alid broke into Nouri's bedroom at 5 a.m., brandishing two kitchen knives and stabbing him in the chest. Nouri managed to fend off Alid, suffering severe injuries in the process. After failing to kill Nouri, Alid took to the streets where he encountered Terence Carney. CCTV footage showed Carney, who was on an early morning walk, being repeatedly stabbed by Alid. Carney, described as a "defenceless" and "beloved" husband, father, and grandfather, was stabbed six times in the chest, abdomen, and back. During his trial at Teesside Crown Court, the prosecution argued that Alid's actions were acts of terrorism, motivated by his desire to retaliate against perceived injustices in Gaza and to influence the British government's foreign policy. Alid himself admitted to the police that his actions were "for the people of Gaza" and that he intended to kill more people. Prosecution lawyer Jonathan Sandiford said Alid had told police that “if he had had a machine gun and more weapons, he would have killed more victims.” Mrs. Justice Cheema-Grubb, who presided over the case, described Alid's actions as a terrorist act intended to intimidate and influence the British government. She noted that Alid had no history of mental illness and that his attacks were premeditated and politically motivated. “You attacked and murdered Terence Carney in a terrorist act. You intended it as revenge for the actions of a foreign country, Israel, and to intimidate and influence the British government in its international relations. You hoped to frighten the people of Britain and to undermine the freedoms they enjoy,” said the judge during sentencing. Alid's arrest was captured on footage showing armed police ordering him to "get down on the ground," with laser dots from their guns trained on him. Despite initial resistance, he was detained and later attacked two female officers during his police interview, shouting "Palestine" and "Allahu Akbar." Alid's violent spree was cut short thanks to the swift action of the police and the bravery of his housemates. Nouri, who had alerted the police about Alid's suspicious behavior days before the attack, had to relocate from Hartlepool due to the psychological trauma inflicted by the event. In his victim impact statement, Nouri expressed his disillusionment, stating, “All my thoughts of here being a safe country have gone. I would expect to be executed for converting to Christianity in my home country. But I did not expect to be attacked in my sleep here.” Carney’s family, in their statement, mourned the loss of a beloved family member and thanked Nouri and others for their courage in testifying. “We would not want anyone else to have to go through what we have had to go through over the last six months, and what we will continue to go through for the rest of our lives. For us, things will never be the same again. We can take some small comfort in knowing that justice has been served,” they said. The case has highlighted issues surrounding the asylum process and the challenges in identifying and managing individuals who may pose a threat. Alid had entered the UK in 2020 after traveling through several European countries. Despite warnings about his behavior, he was not adequately monitored. Justice Cheema-Grubb's decision not to impose a whole-life term, despite acknowledging the terroristic nature of Alid’s crimes, underscores the complexity of legal responses to such acts of violence. Alid’s sentence includes 44 years for murder and a concurrent 19-year term for attempted murder, with additional assaults on police officers considered. This case serves as a grim reminder of the potential for international conflicts to fuel domestic acts of terror and the ongoing need for vigilance and effective law enforcement to prevent such tragedies. Credit: Sky News 2024-05-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Please remain on topic when discussing the "Latest developments and discussion of events in the Israel-Hamas War." Don't be surprised to find your post disappear if you do not.