Social Media

Donald Trump is set to impose a sweeping travel ban on individuals from 43 countries, with Russia facing sharp restrictions on visas. The move, outlined in a dramatic memo, also places key Moscow allies under heavy sanctions, including Belarus, whose citizens may find it increasingly difficult to travel to the United States, according to reports from *The New York Times*. This latest immigration policy proposal comes as Trump navigates the delicate balance of ceasefire negotiations between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. As tensions mount, Trump warned that failure to broker peace could lead to a catastrophic global conflict, stating, "World War III could very easily erupt if peace talks fail." The list of countries that could be banned in full: All travel banned: Afghanistan Bhutan Cuba Iran Libya North Korea Somalia Sudan Syria Venezuela Yemen Visas sharply restricted: Belarus Eritrea Haiti Laos Myanmar Pakistan Russia Sierra Leone South Sudan Turkmenistan Countries have 60 days to address concerns: Angola Antigua and Barbuda Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Chad Republic of Congo Democratic Republic of Congo Dominica Equatorial Guinea Gambia Liberia Malawi Mali Mauritania St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia São Tomé and Príncipe Vanuatu Zimbabwe The memo details three separate categories of travel restrictions, ranging from full visa suspensions to partial bans. The most severe measures target 11 countries, including Afghanistan, Cuba, Iran, and North Korea, which would face complete suspensions. A second group of 10 countries would see partial restrictions affecting tourist, student, and immigrant visas, with some exceptions. The third and largest group consists of 22 nations that have been given 60 days to rectify security deficiencies or risk inclusion in the ban. A U.S. official indicated that the list remains subject to change and is pending approval by key administration figures, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The policy evokes memories of Trump’s controversial "Muslim ban" during his first term, with several of the same countries appearing on the current list. However, many new additions share characteristics with previous targets, as they are predominantly Muslim-majority or nonwhite, economically disadvantaged, and perceived as corrupt. One particularly surprising inclusion is Bhutan, a peaceful Buddhist and Hindu nation nestled between China and India—neither of which appear on the list. Critics argue that crime rates in Bhutan are low and question the justification for its inclusion. Trump's executive order, issued on January 20, mandates enhanced security screenings for foreign nationals seeking entry into the U.S. The directive requires several cabinet officials to submit a list of countries deemed to have inadequate vetting and screening processes by March 21. According to the order, countries failing to meet these standards will face either partial or full travel suspensions. This initiative is a continuation of Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown, a cornerstone of his second-term agenda. In an October 2023 speech, he previewed plans to restrict entry from regions deemed security threats, including the Gaza Strip, Libya, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen. The State Department reportedly compiled the list weeks ago, with input from embassies and regional bureaus on whether the policy is grounded in factual security concerns or political considerations. The proposed measures may still allow wealthy individuals and certain travelers on the "orange" list—where visas are restricted—to enter the U.S. However, they would be required to undergo in-person interviews before obtaining travel approval. It remains unclear whether existing visa holders or green card residents would be exempt from the ban. Among the reasons cited for imposing restrictions are weak passport security, insufficient information sharing on travelers, and the sale of citizenships to individuals from already-banned countries. Nations failing to address these concerns within 60 days risk being moved to more severe categories of restriction. The State Department has yet to comment on the policy. Meanwhile, Trump continues to escalate global tensions with his stark warnings about the potential for war. Speaking to the Justice Department, he cautioned, "I think we have it, I think we have it, but this could lead to World War III, very easily, could very easily lead to World War III." He further emphasized the risks of nuclear conflict, adding, "That was heading into World War III territory. That would've been a war like no other because of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons that you don’t even want to know about." Trump insisted that much of the progress toward peace had been achieved since he took office and revealed ongoing discussions with Putin. "I think we're doing well with Russia. We're speaking with President Putin. We want to get the war over," he stated. As the world watches, the fate of millions hangs in the balance. If these policies are implemented, they could redefine U.S. immigration strategy and deepen geopolitical divisions at a critical moment in global affairs. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2025-03-17

Authorities in Northern Ireland are investigating what could be the region’s first Islamist-related terror attack following a stabbing in Belfast. Counter-terrorism police have become involved after a man was arrested in connection with the incident, which took place on March 1 in the Ormeau Road area, near University Avenue. The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) arrested an 18-year-old suspect, originally from North Africa, after he allegedly stabbed a 51-year-old Northern Irish man in the chest before fleeing on foot. Armed response officers detained him shortly afterward, recovering a kitchen knife at the scene. The suspect was initially arrested on suspicion of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and possession of an offensive weapon. He was also taken for assessment by mental health professionals before later being re-arrested under Section 41 of the Terrorism Act. The investigation is being led by specialist detectives from the PSNI’s Terrorism Investigation Unit, who are working in close collaboration with security services and counter-terrorism officers in England. Authorities believe the suspect acted alone. It has been confirmed that the suspect entered Northern Ireland after traveling from Heathrow Airport to Dublin in 2022. He then moved to Belfast from Dublin in September 2023 and has been residing there since. Police have also been in communication with immigrant communities in Belfast to address concerns that the attack could heighten tensions in the area. PSNI Assistant Chief Constable Davy Beck emphasized that while the suspect has been arrested under the Terrorism Act, the precise motive remains undetermined. “It is important to stress that, while the suspect has been arrested under the Terrorism Act, the motive for the attack has not yet been established,” he said. “The victim, a 51-year-old man, received treatment in hospital and has since been discharged. He continues to receive support from specialist officers.” Beck also stated that investigators are considering multiple potential motivations, including whether the attack was a hate crime, a mental health episode, or an act driven by religious ideology. He further noted, “At this time, no other persons are being sought in connection with the attack. I urge anyone who was in the area at the time or may have information to contact us on 101.” While the investigation remains ongoing, this case marks a significant development in Northern Ireland, which has historically been affected by political violence rather than Islamist-related incidents. Based on a report by Belfast Telegraph 2025-03-17

President Donald Trump is preparing to invoke a little-used law from the 18th century to advance his immigration agenda. The Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a measure originally enacted during the presidency of John Adams, has not been used in over 80 years. The last time it was enforced, during World War II, it led to the internment of Japanese and German individuals, a period widely regarded as a dark chapter in U.S. history. Trump frequently referenced the act on the campaign trail, particularly in the context of his claims about Venezuelan gangs in Aurora, Colorado. Local officials, however, dismissed his assertions as "grossly exaggerated." Now, with his commitment to mass deportations, Trump has signaled his intent to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, even mentioning it during his inaugural address. The Alien Enemies Act was part of the broader Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, which were passed as the United States faced tensions with France. Unlike the other acts, which expired in the early 19th century, the Alien Enemies Act remained in U.S. law. It allows the president to authorize the relocation, arrest, or deportation of any male over the age of 14 who is a citizen of a country at war with the U.S. The law was originally created to supplement the Alien Friends Act, which permitted the president to deport any non-citizen deemed a threat to national security. The first use of the act came during the War of 1812, when President James Madison required British nationals in the U.S. to report personal information, including their occupation, residence, and family details. During World War I, President Woodrow Wilson used it to intern 6,000 German and other foreign nationals. In World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt invoked the law against Japanese, German, and Italian nationals, leading to the internment of thousands of Japanese Americans and requiring foreign nationals from those countries to register with the government. Trump’s renewed interest in the act comes amid heightened focus on immigration and border security, a central issue in the 2024 election. He has pledged to carry out what he calls "the largest deportation program in American history." He is expected to address the Department of Justice on Friday, emphasizing concerns about the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which he has labeled an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the U.S. However, legal experts argue that the Alien Enemies Act has historically been used against citizens of nations that have declared war on or invaded the United States. Some Democratic senators have pushed back against Trump's rhetoric, cautioning against using wartime laws to shape immigration policy. They have also pointed out that Congress holds the power to write immigration laws, not the executive branch. Despite the Trump administration’s strong stance on deportations, data suggests that in its first month, deportation numbers were actually lower than the monthly average under President Joe Biden’s administration. Still, Trump and his allies continue to tout their efforts to ramp up immigration enforcement, raising questions about how and when the Alien Enemies Act might be used in modern times. Based on a report by USA Today 2025-03-17 Update: Trump invokes 18th century law to speed deportations, judge stalls it hours later Source AP News

Nigel Farage arrives in Hull with the energy of a seasoned performer on a comeback tour. Just days earlier, he had been in the U.S., addressing the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Maryland, where he shared the stage with Jordan Peterson and witnessed Steve Bannon deliver what some interpreted as a Nazi salute. From there, he had traveled straight to Cornwall for a Reform UK mini-conference, a gathering that saw protests erupt and, according to Farage, left his security chief with missing teeth after a violent confrontation. Now, he’s in Hull, the latest stop in his mission to establish Reform UK as a major political force. The enthusiasm among his supporters is palpable. A crowd of 2,300 has gathered, each paying a nominal fee to secure their place and prevent protesters from taking seats without showing up. The big draw of the evening isn’t just Farage’s speech but the announcement of Reform’s candidate for mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire—a figure insiders describe as “big in Hull.” Farage kicks off the day with a visit to Allam Power, a factory founded by the late Egyptian businessman Assem Allam, former owner of Hull City FC. Accompanied by his press aide Dan Jukes and a team of security personnel, he steps out of a black Mercedes. As soon as they enter the building, both men are eager for a cigarette. When asked why he still smokes, Farage quips, “I’m not giving the puritans the satisfaction.” Seated in the boardroom, Farage is surrounded by local business figures, including Assem Allam’s son Ehab and financier Johnny Abraham, who helped him secure a Lloyds bank account after he was debanked by Coutts in 2023. Farage, now 60, remains a striking figure: trim, dressed in a Barbour jacket over a blue suit, and sporting Union Jack socks—a staple of his wardrobe. He is instantly engaging, his personality a mix of charm, humor, and casual defiance. Unlike Labour leader Keir Starmer, often perceived as cautious and restrained, Farage exudes a confidence that resonates with his audience. Reform UK’s Rise and Challenges Reform UK has surged ahead in the polls, overtaking both Labour and the Conservatives. Farage’s personal approval rating is now higher than that of Prime Minister Kemi Badenoch. The party is expected to make significant gains in the upcoming local elections, particularly in former Labour strongholds across England, Wales, and Scotland. Despite these gains, Farage acknowledges that Reform remains “a concept party.” While it has secured a foothold in Parliament with five MPs, it lacks the institutional infrastructure of the established parties. To address this, Reform is expanding its London headquarters and building a grassroots network following the Liberal Democrats’ model. “Paddy Ashdown used to say you need ten councillors before you can have an MP,” Farage notes. During a factory tour, Farage listens as local businessmen voice their frustrations over high energy costs, excessive regulation, and what they perceive as government inefficiency. The conversation turns to Hull’s struggling high streets, and Farage controversially claims, “Turkish barbers, we know what they are—money launderers for drug dealing.” No one in the room challenges the assertion. His disdain for government intervention is clear. He criticizes national insurance hikes, dismisses Labour’s workers’ rights bill as harmful to business, and argues that the welfare system discourages employment. “Our voters have alarm clocks,” he says, emphasizing that Reform’s support base consists of working people frustrated with the status quo. Farage’s worldview extends beyond domestic policy. Over lunch—beef Wellington and red wine—he discusses his affinity for Donald Trump, whom he describes as “terrific fun” and “very real.” He believes Trump’s policies on immigration and DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) align with the views of many British voters, even if they dislike his personality. Farage also hints at a doomsday mindset, revealing that he owns a home generator and invests in gold. “I’m ready,” he says with a laugh when asked if he’s a prepper. Reform’s Political Identity As he prepares for the evening’s rally, Farage describes Reform as being at “the center of public opinion.” He distances himself from Germany’s far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), despite past associations. “I sat with a couple of them whom I liked and still like. But there are many in the AfD I wouldn’t contemplate working with,” he says. Reform has faced criticism for its vetting process after several of its 2024 election candidates were linked to extremist views. Farage acknowledges the challenge, noting that when the British National Party (BNP) was active, it absorbed most of the far-right elements. “Now they try to come to us,” he admits. His stance on immigration remains a cornerstone of his appeal. He calls for the UK to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights and to deport illegal migrants without exception. “We just dump them back on France’s beaches,” he says bluntly, dismissing concerns about diplomatic fallout. Farage also acknowledges that Reform’s support skews male but claims recent growth has brought more female members. He cites Andrea Jenkyns, a former Conservative MP now standing as Reform’s candidate for mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, as evidence that women are playing a growing role in the party. The Road to Downing Street? Farage believes the Conservative Party is finished. “Kemi will be lucky to survive past June,” he predicts. He also dismisses Starmer as weak, though he recognizes that Labour is adapting to Reform’s rhetoric on crime and immigration. When asked whether he could become prime minister, Farage doesn’t hesitate. “There’s a good chance, yes,” he says, estimating the odds at “about 35 to 45 percent.” A Party in His Image As the crowd gathers for his speech, the atmosphere is electric. Reform supporters, mostly older and overwhelmingly white, have traveled from across Yorkshire to hear him speak. On stage, he delivers his trademark blend of populist rhetoric and humor, condemning rising crime, uncontrolled immigration, and government failures. “Why don’t we start putting Britain first—in everything?” he asks, to roaring applause. The night’s big reveal is the introduction of Reform’s Hull mayoral candidate, Olympic gold medalist Luke Campbell. The boxing champion receives an enthusiastic welcome, but his speech is hesitant. “I am not a politician…” he admits. When asked about his priorities, he replies, “I will ask the people of Hull.” His inexperience highlights the challenges Reform faces in developing a political team beyond Farage himself. Despite its momentum, Reform remains, at its core, a vehicle for Farage. His personal brand, more than policy details or political structure, is what keeps supporters engaged. Whether that is enough to make him the next prime minister remains to be seen. But if nothing else, Nigel Farage is enjoying his time in the ring. Based on a report by The Times 2025-03-17

Ofcom has withdrawn three further impartiality rulings against GB News following its recent High Court defeat over programs hosted by Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg. The broadcasting regulator had initially ruled that the channel breached impartiality rules, but after the court’s decision in favor of GB News, it has now reversed its stance on additional cases. Last month, GB News achieved a significant legal victory when a judge overturned Ofcom’s decision that the channel had violated broadcasting regulations by allowing Sir Jacob to present news content. Now, in a further development benefiting the network, Ofcom has dropped three more breach decisions concerning episodes hosted by the Conservative couple Esther McVey and Philip Davies. Ms. McVey is the sitting MP for Tatton, while her husband previously served as a Tory MP from 2005 until last year’s general election. Angelos Frangopoulos, chief executive of GB News, expressed concern over the way Ofcom handled the situation. “Ofcom has now removed a total of five breaches against GB News. This follows the High Court’s decision that Ofcom had acted unlawfully. Although we welcome Ofcom’s adjustment of GB News’s compliance record, we note this only happened after GB News’s lawyers wrote to the regulator asking why its website failed to reflect the High Court’s judgment. It is noticeable that whilst Ofcom has previously rushed to social media to publicise new investigations and breach decisions against GB News – including in relation to the five breach decisions that have now been withdrawn – no equivalent posts were made to make the public aware of the High Court’s decision or the withdrawal of the five breach decisions.” Ofcom acknowledged the court’s ruling and signaled its intent to review its policies. A spokesperson for the regulator stated, “We accept the court’s guidance on this important aspect of due impartiality in broadcast news and the clarity set out in its judgment. We will now review and consult on proposed changes to the broadcasting code to restrict politicians from presenting news in any type of programme to ensure this is clear for all broadcasters.” The High Court ruling marked the first instance of Ofcom losing a legal challenge against one of its broadcasting decisions. The case highlighted the ambiguity in existing regulations regarding the role of politicians as news presenters. According to the broadcasting code, politicians are prohibited from acting as newsreaders, news interviewers, or reporters unless there is an exceptional editorial justification. Ofcom had determined that two episodes of Sir Jacob’s State of the Nation breached these rules. However, in her ruling last month, Justice Rowena Collins Rice quashed the verdicts, criticizing Ofcom for failing to differentiate between a news program and a current affairs show. As a result of the ruling, the decisions have been returned to Ofcom for reconsideration, and the regulator has been ordered to cover GB News’s legal expenses. Ofcom’s original interpretation of the broadcasting code also formed the basis for the three additional breach rulings, which concerned two episodes of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil and one episode of Saturday Morning with Esther and Phil, all broadcast in 2023. Based on a report by The Telegraph 2025-03-17

Antisemitism in the UK has reached alarming levels, according to Wendy Sachs, the director of October 8, a new documentary highlighting escalating violence on American university campuses. Sachs, who also serves as the film’s executive producer, believes that the hostility faced by Jewish students in the US mirrors what has been happening in the UK for over a decade. The film’s release coincided with a controversial move by the Trump administration, which withdrew $400 million in federal funding from Columbia University, citing its failure to protect Jewish students during pro-Palestinian protests. Sachs argues that while the US is experiencing a new wave of antisemitism, the UK has been dealing with it for much longer. The new documentary ‘October 8’ is a film that should be seen by all. On Oct. 8, just one day after the Hamas massacre, Sachs was shocked to see pro-Hamas protests erupt in Times Square. Even before Israel had a chance to defend itself. Determined to push back against the growing wave of misinformation and antisemitism, Sachs drafted a treatment for a documentary. Her concerns are backed by data from the Community Security Trust (CST), a UK charity focused on protecting British Jews from terrorism and antisemitism. The organization reported a dramatic increase in antisemitic incidents at UK universities following Hamas’s October 7 attack. In the 2023-24 academic year, CST recorded 272 university-related antisemitic incidents, the highest number ever documented in a single year. This was a sharp rise from 53 incidents the previous year and 55 the year before that. Similar trends have been observed in the US, where Jewish students have faced verbal abuse and even physical assault in the wake of Israel’s military response to the October 7 attacks. At prestigious American universities, student societies have signed statements blaming Israel for the attack, including nearly three dozen groups at Harvard that released a statement holding “the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence.” The documentary features shocking footage, including a Cornell University professor referring to Hamas’s attack as “exhilarating” and “energizing.” Sachs aims to bring October 8 to British audiences within the next six months, hoping to spark greater awareness of campus antisemitism. A spokesperson for CST welcomed the film’s message, stating: “Rising campus antisemitism is a big problem, and we welcome anything that raises awareness of this.” Reviews of the documentary have been mixed. Frank Scheck of The Hollywood Reporter acknowledged its strong message but noted that October 8 “does some cherry-picking of facts and draws some questionable conclusions.” Meanwhile, Michael O’Sullivan of The Washington Post commented that while the film does not demonize either side, it illustrates “how Israel’s pattern of mistakes, if not arrogance, may have helped set a pot on the stove that is now boiling over with venom.” As antisemitism continues to rise on campuses in both the US and UK, Sachs hopes her documentary will serve as a wake-up call to those who may not yet understand the severity of the situation. Based on a report by The Times 2025-03-17

Jewish students at UK universities are feeling increasingly unsafe as campus societies share material glorifying Hamas and spreading antisemitic messages. Concerns over student safety have grown so much that Jewish sixth-formers are now attending workshops to prepare for potential harassment before they even step onto campus. The higher education regulator has made it clear that while universities must uphold free speech, this does not extend to harassment or support for proscribed terrorist organizations. This statement follows reports that student activists have been sharing content sympathetic to Hamas, which is recognized as a terrorist group by the UK government. An investigation by The Times uncovered that some student societies have been publicly praising terrorist “martyrs,” including those responsible for the October 7 attack that claimed over 1,200 lives. Some groups have also engaged with social media content featuring Hamas fighters and have used language echoing antisemitic tropes. This has led to an alarming climate on campuses, prompting the need for training sessions to help Jewish students navigate antisemitism in higher education. Robert Halfon, a former Conservative universities minister, who attended one of these workshops, condemned the current situation as a “shocking stain on our university system.” He pointed out that certain student societies have been posting material that appears to violate their universities' own codes of conduct, which emphasize respect and prohibit harassment. At the University of Leeds, the Students Against Apartheid Coalition engaged with social media posts referencing “messages from the resistance,” alongside an image of Hamas fighters on stage during an Israeli prisoner exchange. The same account also used the phrase “Nazi Zionism,” a well-known antisemitic slur. Meanwhile, Action For Palestine at Queen Mary University in London shared a post praising terrorist “martyrs,” including Yahya Sinwar, the mastermind behind the October 7 attacks, and Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike. In January, Cardiff Students For Palestine posted an image of Hamas fighters surrounding Israeli hostages with the caption, “Glory To The Resistance.” They also shared multiple images of Hamas members celebrating in Gaza, including one showing a fighter surrounded by children with the phrase “the resistance will never die.” The issue is not isolated to a few universities. At Cambridge, students have used Instagram to spread conspiracy theories alleging that Israel is stealing and trafficking Palestinian organs. Many other student societies across the UK have also been found sharing Hamas propaganda online, further escalating tensions on campuses. A spokeswoman for the Office for Students, the independent regulator for higher education in England, issued a statement reinforcing that universities must protect free speech while also preventing harassment. “Universities and colleges should take steps to uphold free speech within the law for students, staff, and visiting speakers. But this does not, and cannot, include discrimination against, or harassment of, Jewish students or staff, or any other conduct prohibited by law, including unlawful support for a proscribed organization,” she said. The Community Security Trust, an organization that monitors and addresses antisemitism, has called for urgent disciplinary action against students and societies engaging in this kind of behavior. Concerns over rising campus hostility have also been highlighted by recent controversies, such as the London School of Economics (LSE) facing backlash for allowing a book launch that critics say provided a platform for Hamas. The book, Understanding Hamas: And Why That Matters, by Helena Cobban and Rami Khouri, has been widely criticized. Cobban, who also spoke at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), was recorded expressing “respect” for Ismail Haniyeh, a Hamas political leader assassinated last year. She also suggested that the October 7 attack was targeted at military objectives. Meanwhile, at King’s College London, tensions flared when a pro-Gaza protest disrupted a panel discussion titled From Conflict to Connection: Israelis and Iranians in Dialogue. The event's moderator, a 21-year-old Jewish student, was forced to take refuge in a nearby room when protesters stormed the venue. “It was a legitimate panel discussion that was focused on dialogue,” he explained. “So it is quite telling that it got shut down by the very people who say they don’t want violence.” He went on to describe how Jewish students are increasingly made to feel unwelcome on campus. “Antisemitism is disguised as anti-Zionism. They say ‘Zionists off our streets,’ but they mean Jews off our streets. It’s like saying breathing is OK, but oxygen is not allowed.” Many Jewish students now find themselves avoiding student events altogether. “University is supposed to be the happiest years of your life,” the student added. “But Jewish students are frightened to walk from their halls of residence to lectures. And Jewish societies are being advised not to have stalls at freshers’ weeks. What’s going on is disgraceful — it’s not getting better, it’s getting worse.” As hostility towards Jewish students rises, calls are growing for universities to take stronger action to protect them from intimidation and ensure that campus environments remain spaces of safety, respect, and open dialogue. Based on a report by The Times 2025-03-17

For the first time in its history, Ofsted, the schools regulator, will be led by a religious school leader. Sir Hamid Patel, the chief executive of Star Academies Trust, has been appointed as interim chairman, stepping in until a permanent successor is found for Dame Christine Ryan. Sir Hamid has been a member of the Ofsted board since 2019 and has overseen the expansion of Star Academies, which operates nearly 40 primary and secondary schools, including several Islamic institutions, a Christian school, and grammar schools. Many of these schools have achieved an "outstanding" rating from Ofsted. His leadership at the trust, which he has headed since its formation in 2010, has been widely recognized, culminating in his knighthood in 2021 for services to education. His career in education began as the headteacher of Tauheedul Islam Girls’ High School in Blackpool, where he implemented policies encouraging students to wear a hijab outside of school and to engage in religious study, such as reciting the Koran weekly. The school also advised against bringing stationery featuring images deemed "un-Islamic," such as those of pop stars. Sir Hamid’s tenure at Tauheedul Islam Girls’ High School was not without controversy. In 2010, the school hosted Sheikh Abdul Rahman al-Sudais, a Saudi cleric known for inflammatory remarks about Jewish people. Sheikh Sudais had previously referred to Jews as "pigs" and prayed for God to "terminate" them. Sir Hamid later defended the visit, explaining in a 2013 interview that students were interested in meeting the cleric, who was widely followed online, and that his visit lasted only 20 minutes. There is no evidence that these remarks were made at the school. His appointment has drawn reactions from various groups. The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism voiced concerns, stating, "We hope that in his new role, Hamid Patel will adopt a higher degree of scrutiny than he appeared to in his previous occupation. British Jews will understandably be concerned that an individual who invited a man who allegedly described Jews as ‘pigs’ to speak to children will be responsible for assessing the performance of schools." However, Star Academies now hosts speakers from multiple faiths, including Jewish, Sikh, Hindu, Christian, and Islamic leaders. Sir Hamid has also made commitments to improving educational outcomes for all students, not just those from religious backgrounds. He has previously highlighted the struggles of white working-class boys in the education system, calling their low academic achievement “a national disgrace” and vowing to support efforts to improve their performance. The National Secular Society acknowledged his appointment with cautious optimism, stating, "At a time when religious fundamentalism is increasingly impacting schools, we’re willing to support any chairman who upholds principles of equality, regardless of sex and religion or belief. We urge Sir Hamid to ensure that Ofsted remains committed to ensuring that religion does not impede educational standards or undermine children’s fundamental human right to a broad and balanced education." His Majesty’s Chief Inspector, Sir Martyn Oliver, praised the appointment, noting, "Sir Hamid Patel runs some of the best schools in England. He is a highly respected school and academy trust leader, knighted for his contribution to education. After more than five years on the Ofsted Board, I’m delighted he is stepping up to lead while the secretary of state recruits a permanent chairman." Sir Hamid’s appointment comes at a time when Ofsted faces scrutiny over its school inspection processes. As interim chairman, he will be responsible for guiding the regulator through ongoing debates about its policies and ensuring that educational standards remain rigorous and fair across all schools in England. Based on a report by NYP 2025-03-17

A terrifying ordeal in West Wales when a Jewish-Israeli music producer, Itay Kashti, was lured from London under false pretenses and violently kidnapped. The three men responsible—Faiz Shah, 23, Mohammad Comrie, 23, and Elijah Ogunnubi-Sime, 20—have now been sentenced to over eight years in prison each after their meticulously planned attack was thwarted. Kashti was invited to what he believed was a legitimate music workshop at a secluded property in the Brynteg area of Llanybydder. The perpetrators posed as representatives of a reputable music production company and used stolen identities to rent the property and arrange a taxi for their unsuspecting victim. When Kashti arrived on August 26 last year, the men, masked and prepared for violence, launched their assault. The attackers also targeted the taxi driver but were forced to abandon their plan when he managed to escape, knowing he would alert the authorities. Police later discovered the three men hiding in nearby fields, leading to their arrest and subsequent guilty pleas to charges of kidnap. Judge Catherine Richards, sentencing the trio at Swansea Crown Court, described the crime as "motivated by events taking place elsewhere in the world" and highlighted the extensive planning involved. "None of you knew the victim," she told them. "He was an entirely innocent, hard-working music producer that you had identified as a victim based on your understanding of his wealth and his Jewish heritage." She imposed a 15-year restraining order alongside their prison terms. The judge detailed the sophisticated nature of the crime, revealing that the perpetrators had created false financial documents, used multiple mobile phones, and even developed escape routes. Messages between the attackers showed they had planned to drug Kashti with ketamine and had acquired an imitation firearm. When they attacked him, they handcuffed him to a radiator and threatened his life. The impact on the victim was profound. Recalling the terrifying experience, Kashti compared it to a national tragedy, saying, "As an Israeli, this incident felt like my own personal October the 7th." He described being kicked in the head, restrained, and told he would be killed if he tried to escape. "The awful attack of 7th of October was flashing through my mind as I lay restrained on the floor in handcuffs." Eventually, after his captors fled, he managed to free himself and call his wife, who alerted the police. Authorities later released images showing blood on the cottage floor and the cable ties used to bind him. Prosecutor Craig Jones revealed that messages between the kidnappers referred to Kashti’s perceived political stance and their lack of remorse. Their plot also included plans to launder extorted money through cryptocurrency. Items found in their possession included face masks, gloves, rental cars, a gag, blindfold, handcuffs, and cable ties—evidence of the chilling extent of their intentions. Mark Gardner, chief executive of the Community Security Trust (CST), expressed gratitude to prosecutors and law enforcement, emphasizing the gravity of the crime. "The combination of criminality and anti-Jewish hatred could easily have resulted in a far worse, perhaps even fatal outcome. We will continue to work with the police and all other partners to ensure the safety of our Jewish community and to bring perpetrators of antisemitism to justice." Inspector Gareth Jones of Dyfed-Powys Police acknowledged the traumatic impact on Kashti and his family. "This sentence today reflects the severity of this offence and the ordeal the victim suffered. We hope it gives the victim a sense of justice. We thank him for his strength, bravery, and patience whilst we carried out a thorough investigation into what was an extraordinary crime." Based on a report by BBC | Telegraphandargus 2025-03-17

China’s military has been spotted conducting drills with massive amphibious landing barges in the South China Sea, raising concerns that these specialized vessels could play a crucial role in a potential invasion of Taiwan. The footage, which surfaced on Chinese social media before being removed, shows the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) testing the Shuiqiao barges—large vessels equipped with retractable bridges designed to unload heavy military equipment onto enemy shores. BREAKING: China unveiled its new huge ”invasion barges” during an amphibious landing exercise near Zhanjiang. The barges will make it possible for China to move large amounts of military equipment to a shore without docking facilities. Ships would dock with barges, unload tanks, trucks and other armored vehicles which could then drive to shore across 120 meter long arm acting as a bridge. Such barges could be used for military operations against Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines and other areas near the South China Sea. Reports indicate that between three and five of these barges were constructed in Guangzhou shipyard in southern China, each completed in just a few months despite development beginning in 2022. Their appearance in drills near Zhanjiang, Guangdong—600 miles from Taiwan—suggests China is refining its amphibious warfare capabilities. Naval analyst HI Sutton, who first reported on the barges in January, described them as “tailor-made for an amphibious assault.” He noted that while China might argue these ships have civilian applications, their size and purpose-built design make such claims unlikely. Dr. Emma Salisbury, a research fellow at the Council on Geostrategy, believes these barges could solve a long-standing logistical challenge for China in mounting a full-scale invasion. “A core problem for the PRC in invading Taiwan is getting the necessary heavy equipment over the Strait – and the solution to that problem is what we are seeing with these barges,” she told The Telegraph. “While landing forces on contested shores is always going to be difficult, these barges look to be ideal for moving tanks, armored vehicles, and the like quickly and safely on to shore.” Allowing information about these barges to reach the public, she added, underscores China’s growing threat in the region. The vessels perform a function similar to the U.S. military’s Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore system (JLOTS), which was used in an attempt to deliver aid to Gaza last year but was operational for only 20 days due to weather, technical, and security issues. However, not all analysts believe these barges will play a decisive role in an invasion scenario. Timothy R. Heath, a senior international defense researcher at RAND, pointed out that the slow-moving barges would be easy targets in a battle. “The slow-moving barges are easily targeted so they are unlikely to survive in the middle of a battle on the beaches,” he told The Telegraph. He noted that China already has military-grade amphibious assault ships that are better suited for deploying armored vehicles. Instead, Heath suggested that the barges might be intended for humanitarian missions in regions with poor port infrastructure. Despite this, defense analyst and former submariner Tom Shugart warned that Taiwan and the U.S. should remain on high alert. While the footage does not indicate an imminent attack, he wrote on X that concerns should grow “for when they’ve fully tested these and perhaps built many more.” China’s rapidly expanding naval capabilities are adding to these anxieties. A recent report from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies highlights that China has built the equivalent of the entire Royal Navy in just a few years, surpassing the U.S. Navy in sheer hull count and nearing its fleet tonnage. Between 2019 and 2023, Chinese shipyards in Dalian, Guangzhou, Jiangnan, and Hudong-Zhonghua collectively produced at least 39 warships—exceeding the Royal Navy’s total battle force fleet. With Beijing’s military ambitions continuing to grow, these developments signal an increasingly tense geopolitical landscape, particularly as China strengthens its ability to project power across the Taiwan Strait. Based on a report by The Telegraph 2025-03-17

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Friday that South Africa’s ambassador to the United States, Ebrahim Rasool, is “no longer welcome” in the country. The decision marks another instance of the Trump administration’s increasing scrutiny of South Africa’s government. In a post on X, Rubio labeled Rasool a “race-baiting politician” who harbors disdain for President Donald Trump. He further declared the ambassador “persona non grata,” effectively barring him from U.S. diplomatic engagement. Rubio’s statement linked to a Breitbart article reporting on Rasool’s comments during a South African think tank’s webinar. In the virtual discussion, Rasool referenced Trump ally Elon Musk’s engagement with far-right figures in Europe, describing it as a “dog whistle” to a global movement of individuals who view themselves as part of an “embattled white community.” The State Department provided no additional details about Rasool’s ban, and it remained unclear whether the ambassador was in the U.S. at the time of the announcement. Rubio posted his statement while en route to Washington from a Group of Seven (G7) foreign ministers meeting in Canada. It is uncommon for the U.S. to expel a foreign ambassador, as persona non grata designations are typically reserved for lower-ranking diplomats. Even during periods of heightened tensions between the U.S. and Russia—such as the Cold War, Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea, allegations of election interference in 2016, and the poisoning of a former Russian intelligence officer in Britain—Washington and Moscow refrained from expelling each other’s ambassadors. Efforts to obtain comment from the South African Embassy in Washington were unsuccessful, as phone calls made toward the end of the workday went unanswered. Rasool, who previously served as South Africa’s ambassador to the U.S. from 2010 to 2015, had only recently returned to the post in January. His background includes a long history of anti-apartheid activism; as a child, he and his family were forcibly evicted from a Cape Town neighborhood designated exclusively for white residents. He later became a political figure in Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress, even serving time in prison for his activism. His expulsion coincides with Trump’s recent executive order cutting aid and assistance to South Africa’s Black-led government. In the order, Trump argued that South Africa’s Afrikaner population—descendants of mainly Dutch colonial settlers—were being unfairly targeted by a newly passed law permitting the government to expropriate private land. South African officials have denied that the law is racially motivated, instead framing it as a means to rectify the injustices of apartheid-era land dispossession. Trump, however, has characterized the law as discriminatory, referring to Afrikaners as “racially disfavored landowners.” His administration also announced plans to offer Afrikaners refugee status in the U.S., despite the fact that no land has yet been expropriated under the law. The Expropriation Act, signed by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa earlier this year, grants the government authority to seize land in cases where it is underutilized or where redistribution serves the public interest. It is intended to address historical inequities stemming from apartheid, when Black South Africans were forcibly removed from their lands and relegated to racially designated areas. Musk, who was born and raised in South Africa and now heads Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, has frequently criticized the law on social media, portraying it as a direct threat to the country’s white minority. His stance has fueled further controversy over the issue, as the Trump administration continues to shape its foreign policy toward South Africa. Based on a report by NYP 2025-03-17

A 42-year-old transgender woman accused of hurling Molotov cocktails at vehicles and defacing a Tesla dealership in Loveland, Colorado, has been identified as Lucy Grace Nelson, also known as Justin Thomas Nelson. According to sources, Nelson lives with her mother due to "emotional problems" and refers to herself as "baby" online. Nelson allegedly carried out multiple acts of vandalism at the dealership, spray-painting offensive graffiti on company signs and vehicles, including phrases such as “Nazi cars” and “f—k Musk,” a direct attack on Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The suspect was arrested on February 24 after returning to the dealership, allegedly carrying additional incendiary devices and materials used for vandalism. Police described the graffiti as “offensive and hateful in nature.” Nelson, who is listed as female on her driver’s license and police booking records, now faces a federal charge of malicious destruction. She was released on a $100,000 cash bond. Federal authorities have declined to clarify whether she is being prosecuted as male or female. Nelson’s father, Claiborne “Jerry” Nelson, 82, told *The Post* that his daughter changed her name a few years ago and has struggled to maintain employment. “He’s in his early 40s but has been living with his mother, who has been taking care of him,” Claiborne said. “He has emotional problems. He hasn’t been able to keep a job.” While Nelson’s motivations remain unclear, social media posts and police documents provide some insight into her activities. A police affidavit includes screenshots of Facebook posts showing a burning Nazi flag and a masked selfie. In other posts, Nelson documented her gender transition, writing, “baby got her first bra… behold the power of socks” and “baby got her first dress” alongside images of herself in feminine clothing. A Reddit account under Nelson’s full name, which has since been suspended, posted in October 2023, “all bigots should be killed,” before clarifying, “morally speaking, that is… don’t actually because going to prison sucks.” The Loveland Police Department confirmed that the incendiary devices found at the scene were dangerous and not mere fireworks. “I know that there’s been some rumors that it was just fireworks and bottle rockets, and that is not the case. That is not true,” said Chris Padgett, a police spokesperson. “The devices that were discovered had potential for serious damage.” Authorities began investigating in late January after Tesla’s Loveland dealership was vandalized on three separate occasions. When Nelson was arrested, she was found with gasoline, spray paint, empty liquor bottles, and cloth soaked in accelerant inside her car. At least four cars, valued at a total of $220,000, had been targeted with firebombs, according to the arrest affidavit. Photos from a criminal complaint filed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives show Tesla signs and Cybertrucks defaced with spray paint, as well as small fires across the dealership lot, believed to have been started by Molotov cocktails inside vodka bottles. Surveillance images captured Nelson throwing explosives at the vehicles. The attacks coincide with an online movement called #TeslaTakedown, which urges shareholders to divest from Tesla and encourages car owners to sell their vehicles. The movement, associated with actor Alex Winter of *Bill & Ted* fame, opposes Musk’s role in President Trump’s cost-cutting task force, DOGE, which has eliminated over 62,000 federal jobs since January. However, Winter’s *Rolling Stone* op-ed does not promote violence. President Trump addressed the Tesla attacks on Tuesday, stating that future acts of vandalism against Tesla facilities would be classified as “domestic terrorism.” He emphasized, “They’re harming a great American company.” As the case against Nelson unfolds, the investigation continues into whether the attacks were politically motivated or part of a broader anti-Tesla movement. Based on a report by NYP 2025-03-17

Three months into his second term, President Trump has reached the highest approval rating of his presidency, while more Americans believe the country is on the right track than at any time since 2004, according to a new NBC News poll released Sunday. The survey found that 47% of voters approve of Trump’s job performance, an all-time high in the poll, although 51% still disapprove. Trump previously reached 47% approval in early 2020, just before the COVID-19 pandemic, and again in October 2018. Despite this historic high, the president has not won over a majority of Americans, and 54% disapprove of his handling of the economy—marking the first time he has lost a majority on that issue in NBC’s polling. Still, voters generally feel Trump is delivering “the right kind of change” on key issues, including his controversial tariffs. The poll found that more Americans support his trade policy (41%) than oppose it (38%), even after a stock market selloff following his decision to impose sweeping tariffs—25% on Canada and Mexico and 20% on China. His immigration policies remain the most popular, with 56% of respondents saying they are a positive change. Government spending cuts were also well received, with 47% approving compared to 29% opposing. Even in areas where Trump has faced significant opposition, such as his approach to the Ukraine war and NATO, more people view his actions positively than negatively—41% and 40%, respectively. On inflation, 40% said his policies are having a positive impact, while 30% believe they are making things worse and 28% see no effect. The poll underscores the sharp partisan divide surrounding Trump. His approval among Republicans stands at a staggering 90%, while only 4% of Democrats support him. According to NBC, this marks the widest gap in partisan approval for a president in the last 80 years. NBC’s findings align with other recent polls. The latest RealClearPolitics average puts Trump’s approval rating at 48.2%, significantly higher than where he stood at this point in his first term (44%). However, it remains below where former President Joe Biden was at the same point in his presidency (53%). In another boost for Trump, 44% of registered voters now believe the country is on the right track—the highest percentage since President George W. Bush was in office two decades ago. While 54% still believe the country is headed in the wrong direction, the shift represents a significant improvement from the previous administration. In September of last year, only 28% of voters said the nation was on the right track, while 65% believed it was on the wrong path. One of Trump’s most significant actions in his second term has been the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a move that has drawn fierce protests from government employees and backlash from Democrats. While the department remains unpopular overall (47% negative versus 41% positive), voters are split on whether it was a good idea, with 46% in favor and 40% opposed. Trump has remained steadfast in his support of DOGE and Elon Musk, backing the cost-cutting initiative as a way to reduce the federal deficit. Perhaps the most striking development in the poll is the dramatic decline in the Democratic Party’s favorability. Only 27% of voters view the party positively, while 55% have a negative opinion—the worst numbers for Democrats in NBC News’ polling history. Based on a report by NYP 2025-03-17

More than 200 alleged members of Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang have been deported from the United States to a high-security prison in El Salvador, despite a federal judge’s order attempting to block their removal. The deportation flights had already left US airspace before the order took effect. El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele confirmed the arrival of 238 Tren de Aragua members along with 23 alleged members of the MS-13 gang on Sunday morning. He shared the news on social media, mocking the legal challenge to the deportations. "Oopsie... Too late," Bukele posted, appearing to taunt the judge’s ruling. Today, the first 238 members of the Venezuelan criminal organization, Tren de Aragua, arrived in our country. They were immediately transferred to CECOT, the Terrorism Confinement Center, for a period of one year (renewable). The White House also reacted, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt posting on X that "these heinous monsters were extracted and removed to El Salvador where they will no longer be able to pose any threat to the American People." US Secretary of State Marco Rubio praised Bukele, calling him "the strongest security leader in our region." The deportations followed an executive action by President Trump, who declared that Tren de Aragua was "conducting irregular warfare" against the United States. Using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, Trump authorized the removal of its members. However, on Saturday evening, US District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, DC, issued a 14-day halt on deportations covered under Trump’s proclamation. When informed that some flights had already taken off, Boasberg verbally ordered them to return, but his written ruling did not explicitly include that directive. The official notice appeared in court records at 19:25 EDT on Saturday (00:25 GMT on Sunday), though it remains unclear exactly when the planes left US airspace. A senior Trump administration official later stated that legal advisors determined the judge’s ruling was not applicable because the flights had already reached international waters. "They were already outside of US airspace," the official told Axios. "We believe the order is not applicable." The US Department of Justice has since appealed Boasberg’s ruling, according to CBS News. Meanwhile, the BBC has reached out to the department for further comment. This latest deportation underscores the growing diplomatic relationship between the US and El Salvador. In February, Rubio made El Salvador one of his first visits after becoming Secretary of State, during which Bukele initially offered to take in US deportees. The move was seen as part of a broader effort to justify the cost of the massive Cecot prison facility. Trump’s second-term immigration crackdown has intensified, with these deportations forming part of his broader push to remove undocumented immigrants. In January, he signed an executive order designating Tren de Aragua and MS-13 as foreign terrorist organizations. His campaign promise to launch the largest deportation operation in US history was a key part of his re-election platform, and this latest move signals his administration’s commitment to fulfilling that pledge. Based on a report by BBC 2025-03-17

President Trump says he has ordered a “decisive” military action against Houthi rebels in Yemen, opening a new salvo against the Iran-backed group that has targeted shipping lanes in the Red Sea. Trump said the US would deploy “overwhelming lethal force” against the group “until we have achieved our objective.” “They have waged an unrelenting campaign of piracy, violence, and terrorism against American, and other, ships, aircraft, and drones,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. He said US personnel were carrying out aerial attacks on Houthi bases, leaders and missile defenses “to protect American shipping, air, and naval assets, and to restore Navigational Freedom.” “No terrorist force will stop American commercial and naval vessels from freely sailing the Waterways of the World,” Trump wrote. Trump approved the Houthi strike plan — which he requested to be drawn up several weeks ago — late last week, and the final order was given on Saturday to begin what officials describe as a sustained attack on the group’s positions in Yemen. Further actions after Saturday will depend on battle damage assessments from this series of strikes, a US defense official told CNN. But there is expected to be more action against the Houthis over the next several weeks. A larger campaign of strikes took time to organize and plan because the US had to collect the intelligence necessary for more sweeping attacks against the Houthis, and that took a considerable amount of time. A senior military official recently told CNN the intel collection required for broader strikes had been completed. The US has been working to degrade Houthi capabilities for months as the entity worked to disrupt international shipping lanes in the Red Sea, one of the world’s busiest waterways, calling the attacks a response to Israel’s war in Gaza against Hamas. The group has targeted more than 100 ships and vessels, including with drones, missiles and small ships. The Biden administration sought to respond by carrying out targeted strikes on Houthi positions in Yemen, including attacking underground weapons storage facilities in October and November, but the actions did not prevent further attacks. The Houthis had previously promised to stop attacks on ships in the Red Sea so long as the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas was maintained. For more than a year, the group had carried out attacks on cargo ships in what it called revenge against Israel for its military campaign in Gaza, leading to a protracted crisis in the sea’s busy shipping corridor. “This ban will continue until the crossings into the Gaza Strip are opened and its needs for food and medicine are allowed to enter,” the Houthis said on Tuesday. “This is not a one off. This is the beginning of an ongoing series of events that will last days if not weeks,” a source familiar with the strategy told CNN. “There is not and will not be an invasion or troops on ground. But there will be a series of ongoing strategic targeted attacks.” Earlier this year, Trump signed an order designating the Houthis a “foreign terrorist organization.” Trump, in his message, said the Biden administration’s approach to the Houthis was “pathetically weak, so the unrestrained Houthis just kept going.” Based on a report by CNN 2025-03-16

An off topic troll post has been removed, any more @Stewart12 and it will not only be posts removed Topic: Democrats Face Backlash for Supporting Arrested Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil

A post with numerous claims that require credible sources has been removed. "In factual areas such as news forums and current affairs topics member content that is claimed or portrayed as a fact should be supported by a link to a relevant reputable source."

Off topic deflection post removed @cjinchiangrai

An inflammatory troll post making numerous false claims and flames has been removed @6Hugh_Janus9 For such a new poster I suggest you head here and do some reading first: https://aseannow.com/forum_rules/ The topic here: Democrats Face Backlash for Supporting Arrested Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil

This topic has been //Closed// as its already running here:

Wethersfield, a quaint village about 50 miles from London, is a picture of English tradition. Neatly maintained houses line country roads leading to a small village green, a school, and the historic St. Mary Magdalene Church, which dates back to the 13th century. But in a field just beyond the village, a young man, Middle Eastern in appearance, sat against a hedge, absorbed in his phone. When approached, he startled, scrambling to his feet and fleeing toward the trees. The old airbase at Wethersfield now serves as an asylum camp, housing adult men who have come from countries such as Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Iraq, and Syria. Many arrived in the UK via the English Channel, crossing in small boats before seeking asylum. Currently, 580 men reside there, with the number set to increase to 800. The government initially announced a target of 1,700 but has since remained vague on the final figure. Before the camp opened, Wethersfield had a population of just 707. The site was originally intended for a prison, an idea met with local opposition. When the plan shifted to an asylum center, villagers were assured it would be temporary. Few believed it. “They’re talking about up to 1,800 people, which is more than twice the population,” said a woman who had moved to Wethersfield from East London. Though she slightly exaggerated the potential number, her concerns were real—soon, the camp’s population could surpass that of the village itself. The people of Wethersfield remain civil, embodying the English tradition of politeness. They do not express overt hostility toward the asylum seekers. Their frustration is directed at the government, both Conservative and Labour, as well as the bureaucratic inefficiency of the Home Office. Still, they cannot deny that life in Wethersfield has changed. Locals report that the asylum seekers loiter in groups along footpaths and trespass on farms. Some have reportedly defecated on village lanes, and despite government efforts to educate them on British customs, villagers claim to have seen some watching children in playgrounds. Security footage captured an attempted house break-in, and one villager recounted, “One tried to burgle the pub.” When asked whether they feared a rise in crime, the villagers hesitated to answer. In England, discussions on migration and crime tread dangerous ground. Everyone is aware of the past scandals involving mass immigration and crime spikes, such as the infamous grooming gangs that targeted young girls across the UK. However, speaking too candidly can have consequences. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has labeled anti-immigration concerns as “far right,” and under the Online Safety Act of 2023, British citizens have faced legal consequences for blunt discussions on social media. Vice President J.D. Vance even criticized Britain for its crackdown on free speech. Some villagers refused to talk about the camp. Those who did speak did so anonymously, wary of repercussions. Their fears were not unfounded. One resident, living near the back gate of the base in a house with countryside views, admitted she could not sell her home—buyers had no interest in a property next to an asylum center. “We hear helicopters, ambulances, and sirens all the time,” she said. “They’re fighting amongst each other in their cells.” When asked if she felt safe, she hesitated. “I’ve got my adult son living here. Luckily, my daughter doesn’t anymore, so that’s good. But our neighbors have younger children.” Would she let her daughter walk alone? “No, probably not.” She didn’t need to explain why. At the Fox on the Green pub in Finchingfield, the barmaids had been instructed to stay silent on the issue. But Sam, a local customer, pointed the way: “You want to speak to Greg Meat.” Greg, a fifth-generation farmer, preferred to go by “Greg the Egg” and had been a lifelong Tory—though lately, he was drawn to Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party. He had already attended three of their meetings. “So far, I’ve liked what I’ve heard.” The conversation mirrored others from migration hotspots across Europe and beyond. From the Italian and French coastlines to the streets of Amsterdam, Paris, and Phoenix, Arizona, communities are struggling with the effects of mass immigration. Across the West, anti-immigration parties are gaining ground, and nations are tightening their borders. The pattern is familiar: migrants are placed in hotels or temporary camps while governments scramble to respond. Once-traditional voters are turning to nationalist movements for solutions. British asylum law requires proof that applicants face persecution in their home countries due to race, religion, nationality, political beliefs, or identity. Some asylum seekers exploit this, claiming religious conversion for asylum. In 2022, 72% of applicants citing LGBTQ+ status were approved. Others have claimed Christianity as a means to stay. Liverpool Cathedral has seen so many Iranian asylum seekers seeking baptism that it established a Persian congregation, baptizing over 300 converts by 2017. Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman alleged in 2024 that “churches around the country” were “facilitating industrial-scale bogus asylum claims.” Yet, successful asylum seekers make up only 11% of UK immigrants. The rest come seeking better economic opportunities. In Wethersfield, villagers remain skeptical. One woman recounted how she had entered the village church and found Iranian asylum seekers preparing for baptism. “They’ve been taken under the wing of a local reverend,” she said. “They’re getting ready to be baptized.” While Iran does suppress Christianity, few in the village believed the conversions were genuine. Reverend Alex Shannon of St. Mary Magdalene declined to discuss the matter, stating, “As a church, we aim to serve all the people of the community. It’s a political issue. We’re not involving ourselves in any public comment.” One resident summed up the village’s predicament: “If people are still coming across the Channel, either they open up more of these places or they jam more people into the ones they’ve already got, right?” She paused, then added, “What’s too many?” The silence that followed was telling—perhaps she already knew the answer. Based on a report by Daily Express | FP 2025-03-15

A growing number of wealthy British families are rushing to relocate to Italy and Greece before April 5 to avoid the upcoming tax reforms set to take effect in the new financial year. With Labour’s inheritance tax increases, higher capital gains tax, and the abolition of the non-dom regime on the horizon, financial experts report a surge in UK taxpayers seeking lower-tax alternatives abroad. Under the new rules, all UK residents will be taxed on their global income and gains, and the remittance basis—where tax is only paid on money brought into the UK—will be eliminated. Meanwhile, frozen income tax thresholds, which push more people into higher tax brackets, will remain unchanged until at least 2028-29. The remittance basis had allowed non-domiciled individuals to avoid UK tax on foreign income, provided they did not bring the money into the country. However, maintaining this status came with an annual charge of £30,000 for those who had been UK residents for at least seven of the previous nine tax years, and £60,000 for those residing in Britain for 12 of the past 14 years. Chris Etherington, from accountancy firm RSM, noted that Mediterranean countries like Italy and Greece are attracting high-net-worth individuals due to their favorable tax regimes, which resemble the soon-to-be-defunct non-dom rules in Britain. Christopher Groves, a partner at international law firm Withers, reported a "huge spike" in clients relocating to Italy, with many scrambling to leave before the tax year ends. "It’s important to make sure you’re gone by April 6 if you’re going to leave next year. You need to have found your villa in Marbella or apartment in Monaco," he said. Groves added that the tax changes had forced many to accelerate their departure plans, often in a rushed and unstructured manner. “The changes to non-dom and inheritance tax rules have pushed lots of people who didn’t have a real plan to leave the UK to bring that forward, which means they’re doing things in a less well thought-through way. The world is so small these days, so it feels like a relatively easy step to take, but there can be practical difficulties.” UK residency is automatically granted to individuals who spend 183 or more days in Britain during a tax year, but moving abroad does not necessarily eliminate UK tax obligations. Some individuals may qualify as non-residents by meeting automatic overseas tests, such as spending fewer than 16 days in the UK if they had not been a resident for the past three years or fewer than 46 days if they had been non-residents for three consecutive years. However, those who fail to meet these tests may still be considered UK residents based on ties such as family, property, or employment. With Britain’s tax burden at its highest level in 70 years and expected to rise further, the 40% inheritance tax has become a key factor motivating many to relocate. Groves highlighted the disparity with other countries: “We’re so out of step [with other nations]. You can go to Italy and [inheritance tax] is single digits if anything, in Switzerland it’s nothing. Here, 40% above £325,000 is confiscatory by comparison.” The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that up to 20% of non-doms may leave the UK due to these tax changes. However, it’s not just non-doms making the move. Wealthy Britons, regardless of residency status, are seeking tax-friendly destinations. In 2024 alone, Britain lost 10,800 millionaires to overseas migration—more than double the number who left in 2023. Research by the Adam Smith Institute suggests that each millionaire who departed last year would have contributed at least £393,957 in annual income tax—an amount equivalent to the tax payments of 49 average earners. Meanwhile, the Saltus Wealth Index found that more than a quarter (28%) of individuals with investable assets exceeding £250,000 are considering leaving the UK within the next year. The Treasury was approached for comment on the exodus of Britain’s wealthy but has yet to respond. Based on a report by The Telegraph 2025-03-15

An eight-mile stretch of protected Amazon rainforest has been cleared to make way for a new four-lane highway, intended to facilitate travel for the upcoming COP30 climate summit in Belem, Brazil. Drone footage reveals wide dirt paths cutting through the dense greenery, while heavy machinery paves over wetlands in what is considered the world's most biodiverse region. The road is meant to ease congestion for the expected 50,000 attendees, including world leaders. Logs have been seen stacked along the cleared land, marking a stark contrast to the original plans. The state government of Pará had previously scrapped the project, known as Avenida Liberdade, due to environmental concerns. However, preparations for COP30 reignited the proposal, leading to its swift approval. Adler Silveira, Pará’s infrastructure secretary, justified the road’s construction, calling it an “important mobility intervention” and a “sustainable highway.” He emphasized the lasting benefits for the local population and the necessity of accommodating COP30 attendees. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva defended the decision, stating that the summit would be “a COP in the Amazon, not a COP about the Amazon.” He insisted the event would highlight the region’s needs while demonstrating the federal government’s commitment to its protection. Despite these assurances, critics argue that cutting down parts of the Amazon—an essential carbon sink—directly contradicts the summit's climate-focused mission. Local residents have voiced their frustrations, fearing long-term consequences. Claudio Verequete, who lives just 200 meters from the highway, expressed his dismay. “Our harvest has already been cut down. We no longer have that income to support our family,” he told the BBC. He also noted that he has received no compensation from the government and worries that the road’s construction will encourage further deforestation. Adding to the community’s concerns, the highway is expected to be walled off, potentially cutting off access for those living nearby. “For us who live on the side of the highway, there will be no benefits. There will be benefits for the trucks that will pass through. If someone gets sick and needs to go to the center of Belém, we won’t be able to use it,” he added. This development comes amid broader environmental crises in the Amazon. In August 2024, vast fires swept through the Amazon, Cerrado savannah, and Pantanal wetland, with many ignited intentionally to clear land. At the same time, the Amazon River reached record lows for the second consecutive year, prompting emergency aid efforts for affected communities. A major tributary of the river in Brazil fell to its lowest recorded level, exacerbating the region’s growing environmental distress. Meanwhile, climate summits themselves face scrutiny over their environmental impact, particularly regarding the use of private jets by world leaders and corporate executives. At COP28 in Dubai, an estimated 291 private flights linked to the event generated 3,800 tonnes of CO2—equivalent to the annual emissions of over 500 people. Alethea Warrington, head of energy, aviation, and heat at climate action charity Possible, criticized the hypocrisy. “Travelling by private jet is a horrendous waste of the world’s scarce remaining carbon budget,” she told *The Times.* “Each journey produces more emissions in a few hours than the average person emits in an entire year.” Similar patterns were observed at COP27 in Egypt, where dozens of private jets landed in Sharm el-Sheikh and Cairo. The popular Gulfstream G650, a frequent choice for summit attendees, burns nearly 1,900 liters of fuel per hour, producing 23.9 tonnes of CO2 on a five-hour flight. Factoring in non-CO2 emissions at high altitudes, a single Gulfstream flight to COP27 may have generated over 45 tonnes of CO2—more than an average person emits annually. At COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, the trend escalated. A staggering 65 private jets arrived in the week leading up to the summit, nearly double the number recorded at COP28. Within just two days, 45 flights landed as the conference commenced. Warrington condemned the double standards: “For CEOs who claim to care about tackling the climate crisis, using a private jet to get to COP shows blatant hypocrisy.” Despite public backlash, government officials have defended their travel choices. A UK government spokesperson maintained that their delegation’s flight to COP27 was “on one of the most carbon-efficient planes of its size in the world” and that emissions were being offset. However, environmentalists argue that such assurances ring hollow when world leaders continue to rely on private jets, contradicting the very essence of these climate summits. Based on a report by BBC | Daily Mail 2025-03-15

Prime Minister Keir Starmer is scrambling to secure an economic agreement with President Trump before the end of the month to prevent sweeping tariffs that could undermine efforts to boost the British economy. With the US imposing global tariffs of 25 percent on steel and aluminium imports on Wednesday, industry leaders in the UK have warned that the measures will be “hugely damaging.” Despite attempts to negotiate an exemption during a phone call with Trump earlier this week, Starmer was unsuccessful in persuading the US president to spare Britain from the tariffs. Nevertheless, the prime minister has decided against imposing retaliatory tariffs, unlike the European Union, amid concerns that such a move could jeopardize the prospect of a broader economic deal with Washington. Trump is preparing to extend the tariffs, with a 25 percent levy on imports from countries that impose VAT on US goods, which includes the UK. These “reciprocal tariffs” are expected to take effect on April 1. Speaking in the Oval Office during a meeting with Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin on Wednesday, Trump made his stance clear. “We’ve been abused for a long time, and we will be abused no longer,” he said. “I am not happy with the European Union. We’re going to win that financial battle.” Last month, during Starmer’s visit to the White House, Trump indicated that Britain could be granted an exemption if a deal on artificial intelligence and other critical technologies could be reached. Now, with the April 1 deadline—dubbed “World Tariff Day” in Whitehall—rapidly approaching, the UK is intensifying efforts to strike a deal. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds will travel to Washington next week for talks with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Government sources remain optimistic, citing similarities in the UK and US approaches to artificial intelligence. While the EU is pushing for strict regulations on AI, the UK has opted for a more flexible approach, relying on voluntary commitments from tech firms. Starmer sees AI as a key driver of economic growth and has held off on introducing AI regulation legislation pending the outcome of the negotiations. The government is hopeful that this stance will align with US priorities and pave the way for a deal. The EU, by contrast, responded to the steel tariffs by announcing countermeasures targeting €26 billion worth of US goods, including bourbon, motorbikes, and industrial and agricultural products. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen defended the decision, stating, “The European Union must act to protect consumers and business. The countermeasures we take today are strong but proportionate.” At Prime Minister’s Questions, Starmer said that Britain would take a “pragmatic approach” to dealing with the White House. “I am disappointed to see global tariffs in relation to steel and aluminium, but we will take a pragmatic approach,” he told MPs. “We are, as he knows, negotiating an economic deal which covers and will include tariffs if we succeed. But we will keep all options on the table.” However, government insiders suggest that the UK is unlikely to retaliate against the US. Instead, officials are focusing on measures to prevent an influx of cheap steel, originally destined for the American market, from being “dumped” in the UK, further destabilizing the domestic steel industry. A Whitehall source claimed that Britain is in a “much better place” than the EU when it comes to negotiations. “They don’t have any cards to play,” the source said. “We do.” The strained relationship between Trump and the EU is another factor, with the US president previously asserting that the European bloc was designed to “screw the United States.” James Murray, the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury, urged caution, telling Times Radio that ministers must remain “cool-headed.” “We think that the best way for the UK to respond is with a cool-headed, pragmatic, productive response working with the US, whilst at the same time making absolutely clear that we will stand up for British industry and all options are on the table,” he said. With time running out, Starmer’s government is working urgently to secure a deal that would shield the UK from Trump’s sweeping tariffs while maintaining a strong economic relationship with the US. Based on a report by The Times 2025-03-15

Who will be the one to tell Jamie Oliver that dyslexia may not exist? And when they do, will the famous chef be relieved to be freed from this supposed burden, or will he be upset? Most likely, the latter. Dyslexia, much like its equally debated counterpart ADHD, is one of those rare conditions people seem eager to claim. Neither has an objective, testable, or scientifically verifiable diagnosis, yet both come with certain advantages for those labeled with them. Individuals diagnosed with dyslexia may receive special accommodations, including extended time for exams, the assistance of a scribe, or access to specialized software and modified test papers. There are even free or discounted laptops equipped with spelling support software. Similarly, ADHD diagnoses can grant access to untaxed welfare benefits that are not means-tested. Prescriptions for stimulant medication—closely related to illegal amphetamines—are readily available and even circulate in black markets. Fortunately, there is no specific pill for dyslexia yet. This is a thriving industry, with an estimated 870,000 children in Britain classified as dyslexic. Given the scale of the industry, criticism is often met with outrage. This is why figures like Jamie Oliver, who openly identify as dyslexic, receive widespread praise. The celebrity chef is set to present a documentary on dyslexia for Channel 4 later this year, a move hailed as courageous. But is it truly brave? The real minority in this debate may not be those who claim to have dyslexia, but those who question its very existence. Speaking on the BBC, Oliver described his school years as happy but admitted he struggled with reading, writing, and spelling. He famously left school with just two GCSEs. "I was running away from words, from reading and writing. I thought it was just me. But there were hundreds of thousands of us every year." He expressed concern that children like him suffer from declining self-esteem before the age of ten. His experience is undoubtedly real—struggling to read can make school miserable. But is the explanation really dyslexia? No universal definition or objective test for dyslexia exists. Every child who struggles to read faces different challenges, yet the solution often remains the same: synthetic phonics (SP), a time-tested method in which children learn to associate sounds with letters. This is how reading was traditionally taught before so-called modern methods emerged. One London teacher, Hungarian-born Eva Retkin, maintained for years that she could teach any child to read as long as they knew the alphabet. When challenged by a national newspaper, she proved her claim. Even at 80, long past retirement, she continued to teach reading with remarkable success. "I always had about 30 pupils in my class, so I assume a few of those were dyslexic, if that's what you want to call it, but it made no difference. They all learned to read before secondary school. Every single one of them." This aligns with findings from two respected academics, Professor Julian Elliott of Durham University and Professor Elena Grigorenko of Yale University. Their book *The Dyslexia Debate* dismantles the notion of dyslexia as a distinct condition, pointing out that there is no agreed definition or diagnostic standard. Despite this, society continues to discuss dyslexia as if it were an undisputed fact. Parliament’s Science and Technology Select Committee reached a similar conclusion in 2009, stating, "There is no convincing evidence that, if a child with dyslexia is not labelled as dyslexic, but receives full support for his or her reading difficulty, that the child will do any worse than a child who is labelled dyslexic and then receives special help." The reason is simple: both groups receive the same intervention. But as Elliott and Grigorenko note, being labeled dyslexic is often seen as advantageous. It can grant access to additional resources, exam accommodations, and most importantly, relieve parents, teachers, and children of any perceived responsibility. The real issue is not with the children. They are not to blame. The failure lies elsewhere. As American author Rudolf Flesch argued in *Why Johnny Can’t Read*—a book published 70 years ago—the root of the problem is flawed teaching methods. The widespread adoption of "look and say" reading strategies in the 1930s and 1940s replaced traditional phonics, leaving generations of children struggling to read. Despite overwhelming evidence in favor of phonics-based instruction, resistance remains. A seven-year study in Clackmannanshire, Scotland, confirmed the effectiveness of synthetic phonics in teaching literacy. Since 2005, English schools have been legally required to use SP, yet many teachers remain reluctant. Opposition still comes from "progressive" educators who see SP as rigid and joyless. A recent paper by Charlotte Hacking and Dominic Wise criticizes phonics, arguing that its strict structure stifles children's learning. Until phonics-based teaching is fully embraced, the dyslexia industry will likely continue to thrive. And as long as that happens, the number of "dyslexic" children in Britain will remain high—even though, with proper instruction, many of them could learn to read just like any other child. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2025-03-15