Social Media

An Illinois man has been sentenced to 60 years behind bars for the brutal murder of his pregnant girlfriend, a crime that shocked the community with its savagery. Deundrea Holloway, 25, received his sentence after pleading guilty to the gruesome killing of 22-year-old Liese Dodd, who was nearly eight months pregnant. The Madison County State’s Attorney’s Office confirmed the sentencing in a press release earlier this week. Liese Dodd, described by loved ones as loving and spirited, was discovered dead in her Alton apartment on June 9, 2022. Her mother, Heidi Noel, went to check on her after not hearing from her daughter, only to make the horrifying discovery of her headless body inside the apartment. Police responding to the scene later found Dodd’s head discarded in a dumpster outside the building. “She was savagely, savagely killed,” former Alton Police Chief Marcus Pulido said, reflecting the community’s outrage and grief. “She was decapitated. Decapitated by a freaking savage monster. Her unborn child was also killed as a result of this. This daughter, this mother-to-be, and her family were in the planning stages of a baby shower that was supposed to be at the end of June.” Holloway, who had been in an on-and-off relationship with Dodd for about two years, was not the father of her unborn child. He was quickly apprehended following the murder and later pleaded guilty to charges including first-degree murder, intentional homicide of an unborn child, and concealment of a homicidal death. At the sentencing hearing, Dodd’s mother expressed the profound loss her family continues to endure. “On that night, I received a life sentence,” she said, as reported by First Alert 4. “To live the remainder of my life without my beautiful, loving, sassy daughter. A life without knowing the joy of watching Liese raise my granddaughter.” The trial and sentencing brought an end to over a year of legal delays, allowing Dodd’s family some closure. Madison County State’s Attorney Tom Haine emphasized the importance of sparing the family the added trauma of a trial. “This guilty conviction ends that,” Haine stated. “Our hope is that this conviction and sentence provide the family and loved ones some assurance and will be a step toward healing.” He commended the family’s strength throughout the ordeal, calling their courage remarkable. Community support has been vital for Dodd’s family. A GoFundMe campaign raised nearly $16,000, covering funeral expenses and enabling donations to local organizations, including $5,000 to the Oasis Women’s Center-Alton and $2,000 to the Riverbend Humane Society. Holloway will serve a minimum of 52 years before being eligible for release, but officials believe it is unlikely he will ever be freed. “It is unlikely he will ever see the light of day,” Haine said, reflecting the severity of the sentence. For the family and community, the conviction marks a significant step toward healing, though the scars of this horrific crime will remain. Liese Dodd’s memory lives on as her family and friends honor her life and advocate for support for victims of domestic violence. Based on a report by Sky News 2025-01-23

The United States has launched an ambitious $500 billion artificial intelligence initiative that threatens to overshadow European efforts and cement U.S. dominance in the AI race. On Tuesday, former President Donald Trump unveiled the monumental plan, which begins with the construction of a massive data center in Texas and aims to establish the infrastructure needed for long-term AI supremacy. The announcement has stunned European leaders and tech investors, many of whom see it as a stark reminder of the widening gap between Europe and the U.S. in technological innovation. “This is more than a wake-up call; this is a slap in our face,” said Christian Miele, general partner at venture capital firm Headline, which invests in French AI company Mistral. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has repeatedly expressed aspirations for the EU to lead in AI innovation. French President Emmanuel Macron is also planning to advocate for European AI dominance at an upcoming global AI summit. However, the sheer scale of the U.S. investment dwarfs European ambitions, highlighting a growing focus in Washington on countering China's influence in the field. Europe, which has already fallen behind in social media, cloud computing, and semiconductor production, now faces an uphill battle in AI development. In a single week, the U.S. has adopted a far more aggressive approach, including restricting the export of AI chips and scrapping earlier plans for AI regulation. This culminated in the launch of the $500 billion AI project, which one investor compared to the Manhattan Project—the program that developed nuclear weapons during World War II. While the European Union has outlined plans to support AI development, its efforts pale in comparison. The Commission recently allocated €1.5 billion, with half the funding coming from the EU budget, to support the development of AI-optimized supercomputers across seven sites. But as Holger Hoos, an AI professor at RWTH Aachen University, noted, “The EU’s investment is several orders of magnitude below what has just been announced in the U.S.” Venture capitalist Christian Miele echoed these concerns, stating that European policymakers have yet to grasp the strategic significance of AI. The EU’s fragmented financial markets and lack of Big Tech companies further compound the issue. Giorgos Verdi, a policy fellow at the European Council for Foreign Relations, observed that Europe lacks industry giants like OpenAI or Nvidia to attract private investment on the same scale. “We don’t have these Big Tech champions that the U.S. has; we don’t have this luxury of being able to work with them in order to mobilize private capital,” Verdi said. The energy crisis also hampers Europe’s ability to compete. Data centers required to train AI models consume enormous amounts of energy, and rising energy costs—exacerbated by the war in Ukraine—pose a significant challenge. Meanwhile, Trump’s administration has prioritized domestic energy production, declaring a “national energy emergency” to bolster oil and gas output. This stark contrast in energy policy underscores Europe’s vulnerability. “The kind of energy that is going to be needed in order to operate infrastructure on that scale is going to be insane,” said Miele. Trump’s plan, dubbed the Stargate Project, will immediately allocate $100 billion in funding. It involves major private-sector players, including Japan’s SoftBank, AI pioneer OpenAI, and chipmakers Nvidia and Arm. Microsoft, through its Azure cloud services, will also play a key role. For Europe, the U.S.’s bold move is a sobering reality check. Despite efforts to catch up, the continent remains far from competing with the scale, funding, and infrastructure of its transatlantic counterpart. While the EU continues to promote AI innovation, the gap between Europe and the U.S. only seems to be widening. Based on a report by Politco 2025-01-23

The UK experienced a dramatic decline in wind power production, with output falling to less than 1% of the country’s electricity supply due to some of the stillest weather in years. This rare atmospheric condition, known as a “dunkelflaute,” has brought winter wind farm production to what is believed to be its lowest level since 2015, a time when fewer turbines dotted the landscape. The lack of wind has forced the UK to lean heavily on electricity imports from neighboring countries such as France, Norway, Belgium, and Denmark. These undersea cable connections collectively supplied over 10% of the UK’s electricity on Wednesday, helping to stabilize the grid during the calm spell. Adding to the controversy surrounding wind power, former U.S. President Donald Trump reignited his criticism of wind farms earlier this week. He described turbines as “inefficient, ugly, and a threat to wildlife” while halting offshore wind developments in U.S. waters. With wind power faltering, Britain relied on its ageing fleet of gas-fired power stations, which provided over 60% of the nation’s electricity. The increased demand meant the National Energy System Operator (Neso) had to activate additional and costly backup capacity. At midday on Wednesday, the Connahs Quay 2 power station was offered a staggering £745 per megawatt hour to begin generating, a stark contrast to the typical market rate of around £100. These higher costs are expected to trickle down to consumer energy bills. While similar calm spells have occurred in the past—such as in May 2020—these typically happen during warmer months when energy demand is significantly lower. Winter days, however, bring higher electricity usage, with daytime demand averaging around 35 gigawatts (GW) and peaking at up to 50GW on very cold evenings. On Wednesday morning, the UK’s 12,000 wind turbines, which typically generate around 10GW and can reach up to 23GW during strong winds, were producing a mere 200 megawatts (MW). This output is equivalent to the contribution of just 30 large turbines on a windy day. With such low production, wind farms were effectively non-contributors to the power grid, and the strain on energy supply was heightened as evening demand approached. The Met Office had predicted the calm conditions, giving Neso time to prepare. It warned that winds across the UK, the North Sea, and nearby regions would remain extremely light until Thursday evening. However, relief was expected with the arrival of Storm Eowyn on Friday, bringing winds of up to 100mph. When asked about the preparations made during this tight period, Neso declined to comment on its operational strategies. Despite planning efforts, the last few days have been some of the most challenging for the UK’s power grid in recent years. The closure of the Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station in Nottinghamshire last September further strained the grid. As the UK’s last coal-fired power station, it could have provided an additional 2GW of capacity, easing the pressure during this calm spell. However, its shutdown was part of the UK’s efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Critics of wind energy have used the calm spell to amplify their concerns. Richard Tice, energy spokesman for Reform UK, supported Trump’s comments, stating, “Trump is right about wind turbines – they are ugly, expensive, and harm wildlife, including causing huge damage to marine life. People who invest by relying on subsidies for their long-term viability should not be surprised that eventually people wake up and say this is wrong. I have no sympathy. Short-term subsidies may be justifiable but not long-term ones for investors.” As the UK navigates the challenges of transitioning to greener energy sources, this episode highlights the ongoing difficulties in balancing sustainability, reliability, and affordability in the nation’s power system. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

In a demonstration of strength and resolve, the Royal Navy deployed an attack submarine to surface near a Russian spy ship suspected of mapping Britain's critical undersea infrastructure. The incident, which first occurred in November and re-emerged this week, highlights the UK’s escalating concerns over Russian activities in its waters. Defence Secretary John Healey addressed Parliament in a rare disclosure, revealing that the Royal Navy submarine HMS *Astute* confronted the Russian research vessel *Yantar* off the UK coast. The initial event took place near Cornish waters, prompting Healey to adjust naval rules of engagement, allowing British warships and submarines to approach closer and track the vessel more effectively. Speaking directly to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Healey declared: “We see you. We know what you are doing. And we will not shy away from robust action to protect this country.” The Defence Secretary emphasized the seriousness of the situation by publicly acknowledging the movements of the UK’s nuclear-powered submarine fleet—an exceptional step that underscores the gravity of the threat posed by *Yantar*. The vessel has been identified as a tool for gathering intelligence and mapping vital undersea cables and pipelines, which are critical components of Britain’s infrastructure. Russia’s activities in UK waters have alarmed NATO allies, who share growing concerns about the Kremlin’s potential to disrupt offshore infrastructure. A senior NATO official recently warned of the “real prospect” that Russia could engage in unconventional attacks, such as sabotage or arson, with potentially devastating consequences. In its latest incursion, *Yantar* entered the UK’s exclusive economic zone, approximately 45 miles off the British coast, on Monday. The spy ship was reported to be traveling through the English Channel, heading east toward the North Sea. In response, the Royal Navy deployed Type 23 frigate HMS *Somerset* and patrol vessel HMS *Tyne* to monitor the ship’s movements continuously. Healey assured Parliament and the British public: “Russia remains the most pressing and immediate threat to Britain, and I want to assure the House and the British people that any threat will be met with strength and resolve.” The UK’s efforts to counter Russian activities extend beyond its waters. P-8 Poseidon and Rivet Joint spy planes are now part of NATO operations to secure undersea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. Additionally, RFA *Proteus* has been tasked with monitoring offshore cabling and pipelines. The highly publicized confrontation reflects a broader strategy of deterrence against Russia’s increasingly aggressive maneuvers. As the UK and NATO prepare for potential unconventional attacks, Healey’s message to Russia was clear: Britain will not tolerate threats to its sovereignty or security. Based on a report by Sky News 2025-01-23

In a gesture tied to recent developments in Gaza, Yemen's Huthi rebels released the 25-member crew of the merchant ship Galaxy Leader on Wednesday. The crew had been detained for more than a year, and the rebels cited the ongoing ceasefire between Israel and Hamas as a key factor in their decision. The Galaxy Leader's ordeal began in November 2023 when the Iran-backed Huthis, in a campaign declared in support of Palestinians, launched a series of attacks targeting shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. On November 19, helicopter-borne Huthi fighters seized the Galaxy Leader, a vehicle carrier, detaining its international crew. The crew's release, announced by the Huthi-controlled Saba news agency, was framed as part of their support for the ceasefire in Gaza, which began the preceding Sunday. Oman played a critical role in facilitating the release. According to Saba, the Gulf sultanate provided essential assistance in the process. The crew, including a Bulgarian captain and second-in-command, 17 Filipinos, and sailors from Ukraine, Romania, and Mexico, were flown from Sanaa to Muscat aboard an Omani air force plane. At a press conference on the tarmac, the crew stood alongside a Hamas official, who praised the "coordination" between Hamas and the Huthis that secured their release. The rebel-affiliated Al-Masirah TV channel aired the event. Bulgaria’s foreign ministry later confirmed that Prime Minister Rosen Zhelyazkov had dispatched a government plane to bring the two Bulgarian citizens home. United Nations special envoy for Yemen, Hans Grundberg, welcomed the release, calling it “heartwarming news that puts an end to the arbitrary detention and separation that they and their families endured for more than a year.” Grundberg also called on the Huthis to cease all maritime attacks. Arsenio Dominguez, head of the International Maritime Organization, hailed the development as "a moment of profound relief for all of us—not only for the crew and their families but also to the wider maritime community." He emphasized that the release underscored the importance of diplomacy and dialogue, adding that innocent seafarers should never become "collateral victims in wider geopolitical tensions." The Galaxy Leader, a Bahamas-flagged vessel operated by a Japanese company, has British ownership and ties to Israeli businessman Abraham "Rami" Ungar. During its detention, the Huthis repurposed the ship as an attraction for Yemeni tourists, flying Yemeni and Palestinian flags from its mast in Hodeida, a rebel-held province. As part of Iran's "axis of resistance," the Huthis have remained active in regional conflicts. Since the onset of the Gaza war, they have launched missiles and drones targeting Israel. On Tuesday, the Huthis declared they would limit attacks to vessels linked to Israel during the ceasefire. For the families of the Galaxy Leader crew and the international maritime community, this resolution brings much-needed relief after a prolonged and tense period. The release also underscores the potential for diplomatic engagement in easing humanitarian crises, even amid complex geopolitical struggles. Based on a report by AFP 2025-01-24

A united front of British supermarkets has emerged in support of farmers protesting against the government’s planned inheritance tax reforms. Tesco, Aldi, Lidl, the Co-op, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s, and Asda have all voiced their opposition to the proposed changes, joining calls for a pause and consultation on the policy, which many fear will have far-reaching consequences for the agricultural sector. The government’s plan, set to take effect in April next year, introduces a 20 percent inheritance tax on agricultural and business assets exceeding £1 million. Farmers argue that this policy will impact approximately 75 percent of commercial farms, potentially forcing many to sell their land and threatening the viability of family-owned farming businesses. Ashwin Prasad, Tesco’s chief commercial officer, emphasized the urgency of addressing farmers’ concerns, stating, “The UK’s future food security is at stake.” He urged the government to pause the implementation of the reforms and conduct a full consultation, calling for a long-term vision for UK agriculture that enables farmers to invest confidently while contributing to the nation’s transition to net-zero emissions. Lidl shared similar concerns, warning that the changes could undermine farmer confidence and deter investment in building a resilient and sustainable British food system. Aldi, which signed a National Farmers’ Union (NFU) letter urging the government to reconsider, stressed the importance of fostering a farming sector capable of investing in its future and delivering high-quality British food. Protests have been escalating, with farmers parking tractors in supermarket car parks to draw attention to the issue. Sainsbury’s, Morrisons, and Asda have also expressed public support for farmers, urging the government to listen to their concerns. In an earlier statement, Morrisons reassured farmers, saying, “We’re with you,” while Asda offered similar backing. The debate gained further traction with the release of a report by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). The report cast doubt on the government’s revenue projections, stating it was “highly uncertain” how much money the tax changes would generate. The OBR suggested that tax planning strategies, such as utilizing other reliefs, increasing charitable donations, or depleting estate values, could significantly reduce the policy’s impact. It also warned that the changes might not yield consistent revenue for at least 20 years. The government has estimated that the reforms could raise £500 million annually by 2029-30. However, the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), which represents landowners and rural businesses, has challenged this projection. CLA president Victoria Vyvyan argued that the economic implications of the policy had not been fully considered. “It is clear that neither the Treasury nor the Office for Budget Responsibility has fully considered the impact on the economy of these tax reforms,” she said. Vyvyan pointed to broader consequences, including reduced investment, job losses, and threats to food security. She urged the government to engage in meaningful consultation to understand the potential damage. “This means fewer jobs, less food security, less growth, and less money going into the Exchequer to pay for public services,” she warned. The CLA’s analysis suggests that over a generation, the reforms could affect as many as 70,000 farms, with at least 500 farms a year potentially facing significant inheritance tax bills. Even at the government’s lower estimate, more than 20,000 farms could be impacted over 40 years. Environment Secretary Steve Reed has defended the reforms, citing validation from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and the OBR. However, the IFS has recommended revising aspects of the policy to prevent family farms from being split up, acknowledging concerns raised by farmers and landowners. As the debate continues, the solidarity between supermarkets and farmers underscores the urgent need for a balanced approach that addresses the concerns of all stakeholders while safeguarding the future of British agriculture. Based on a report by BBC 2025-01-24

In a significant move to address militant activities in the Middle East, President Donald Trump on Wednesday directed his administration to redesignate Yemen’s Houthi rebels, officially known as Ansar Allah, as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO). The decision, aimed at cracking down on the Iranian-backed group, reinstates a designation Trump first imposed during his initial term in office, which had been subsequently reversed by the Biden administration. The executive order signed by Trump initiates the process of relisting the Houthis as an FTO, with the White House emphasizing the group’s attacks on U.S. Navy ships, commercial vessels, and civilian infrastructure across the region. This measure, according to the administration, seeks to disrupt the group’s financial support and curtail its operations. By imposing the designation, the U.S. Treasury Department gains broader authority to enforce sanctions and warn foreign entities that engaging with the Houthis could jeopardize their access to the U.S. financial system. In addition to targeting the Houthis, the executive order directs the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the State Department to review affiliations with United Nations agencies, contractors, and nongovernmental organizations operating in Yemen. Following this review, the administration plans to end partnerships with groups that make payments to the Houthis. The White House framed this as a necessary step to ensure U.S. resources are not indirectly supporting the militant group. “This action is critical to holding the Houthis accountable for their destabilizing activities,” the administration stated, underscoring the group’s ongoing threats to regional stability and U.S. interests. The relisting of the Houthis as an FTO has long been a contentious issue. While Trump originally designated the group during his first term, the Biden administration later reversed the decision over concerns that the designation could hinder humanitarian aid from reaching Yemen’s vulnerable population. Yemen remains embroiled in a protracted conflict that has resulted in a severe humanitarian crisis, with millions facing hunger and displacement. Notably, Trump’s initial designation of the Houthis as a terrorist organization drew rare criticism from Republican lawmakers. Many expressed concerns that such a move would exacerbate the humanitarian crisis by blocking critical aid to Yemen. However, the White House argued that the measures are designed to restrict the Houthis’ access to financial markets without obstructing aid delivery. In a related development, the Biden administration last week declared the Houthis as a “specially designated global terrorist group,” a classification that allows for targeted sanctions and funding restrictions. Although this designation was set to take effect within 30 days, Trump’s new order signals his administration’s commitment to accelerating efforts to curtail the Houthis’ influence. The decision to reinstate the terrorist designation highlights the broader tensions surrounding U.S. policy in Yemen and the challenge of balancing counterterrorism objectives with humanitarian considerations. The administration’s move signals a firm stance against the Houthis while leaving open questions about the implications for Yemen’s humanitarian crisis. Based on a report by The Hill 2025-01-24

With a potential tariff war looming between Canada and the United States, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has adopted a different approach in hopes of resolving the crisis. After initially warning of economic hardships and preparing for retaliation, Trudeau is now offering a more conciliatory message, emphasizing Canada's value as a trusted partner to the U.S. In an effort to appeal to President Donald Trump’s vision for America’s prosperity, Trudeau spoke optimistically about a shared future. “Canada is a safe, secure and reliable partner in an uncertain world,” he said this week. He added that failing to nurture the partnership could drive the U.S. toward “more resources from Russia, China or Venezuela.” This shift in rhetoric reflects Canada’s urgent attempt to avert a 25% blanket tariff on imports, a measure being weighed by its largest trading partner. The threat of these tariffs, compounded by Trump’s unpredictable objectives and timelines, has left Canada scrambling for a clear strategy. Canadian officials are now torn between retaliation and appeasement, with no consensus on the best course of action. While Canada has prepared potential countermeasures, such as targeted tariffs on U.S. goods like Florida orange juice or a broader "dollar-for-dollar" retaliation, these tactics are fraught with uncertainty. Similar approaches were used successfully during Trump’s first term, when tariffs were imposed on Canadian steel and aluminum. But this time, the stakes and dynamics appear different. Further complicating the matter is a divide among Canadian leaders. Trudeau has hinted that even drastic measures, including taxing or embargoing energy exports to the U.S., are on the table. However, this suggestion has faced opposition, particularly from Premier Danielle Smith of Alberta, an oil-rich province. Smith has voiced her disapproval of using energy as leverage, signaling internal divisions over how to proceed. Both Trudeau and Smith have taken their concerns directly to Florida, meeting with Trump in person to make their case. Despite Trudeau’s efforts, his frustration is evident. “We’ve been here before,” he told reporters on Tuesday, referencing the challenges of Trump’s first presidency. “The first Trump presidency represented moments of uncertainty and threats of instability that we were able to work through constructively.” Canada’s ambassador to Washington, Kirsten Hillman, has also weighed in, suggesting progress in understanding the Trump administration’s priorities. She noted that discussions had shifted from abstract debates to more concrete negotiations, pointing to the “America First” trade review commissioned by Trump. This review outlines U.S. trade priorities centered on national security, with key roles assigned to Trump’s nominees for treasury secretary, commerce, and trade representative, all awaiting Senate confirmation. The stakes for Canada are significant. Around 75% of its exports are destined for the U.S., while only 17% of U.S. exports head north. This imbalance leaves Canada in a vulnerable position, with limited bargaining power. “The U.S. can afford to have a long trade war with Canada, and Canada less so,” said Theo Argitis, managing director of the Compass Rose Group. He added that while Canada has long considered diversifying its trade partnerships to reduce reliance on the U.S., such efforts have repeatedly fallen short due to the geographical and cultural proximity of the two nations. As Canada grapples with its response, Argitis emphasized that avoiding a trade war remains the country’s top priority. “There’s been no evidence that Canada is able to diversify at all, and so we’re kind of stuck with option number one,” he said. Ultimately, the advantage appears to rest with Trump, leaving Canada to navigate a difficult path. Whether through retaliation, diplomacy, or a combination of both, Trudeau’s government faces a critical test as it seeks to shield its economy from potentially devastating U.S. tariffs. Based on a report by BBC 2025-01-24

Off topic post @Neeranam this is not about other posters and what their religion is, please read the topic and remain on it if you do not want any other posts removed.

More way off topic posts removed. Please discuss the thread without the need for personal attacks and off topic trolling

Post on shootings in the US has been removed, please discuss the topic not deflect to the US shootings

A number of off topic false and inflammatory claims have been removed along with a couple of replies to them. @tony2times A comment on moderation from the same poster also removed.

A devastating knife attack in Bavaria has left two people dead, including a two-year-old boy, and three others injured. The tragic incident unfolded in Aschaffenburg, a city of 72,000, just before noon on Wednesday. The suspect, identified as a 28-year-old Afghan national, has been apprehended. Authorities revealed that the suspect, a former asylum-seeker ordered to leave Germany, launched the attack in a park. Among his victims was a two-year-old Moroccan boy, who was part of a group of kindergarten children. Bavaria's top security official, Joachim Herrmann, disclosed that the boy was fatally stabbed with a kitchen knife. A 41-year-old German man, who appeared to intervene in an effort to protect the children, also lost his life. In addition to the fatalities, two adults and a two-year-old Syrian girl sustained injuries but are not in critical condition. Passersby acted swiftly, pursuing the attacker and aiding police in his arrest just 12 minutes after the assault. Joachim Herrmann detailed the suspect’s background, noting his prior involvement in violent incidents. "This individual had come to authorities' attention at least three times because of acts of violence," Herrmann said. Each time, the suspect underwent psychiatric treatment before being released. The suspect reportedly arrived in Germany in November 2022 and applied for asylum in early 2023. By December 4, he informed authorities of his intention to voluntarily leave the country and seek documentation from the Afghan consulate. However, his asylum application was formally denied, and he was instructed to leave Germany shortly thereafter. Investigators are now working to uncover the motive behind the attack, with early findings pointing to the suspect’s psychiatric condition. Herrmann stated, "A search of his room at a refugee home revealed no evidence of radical Islamic views, but it did turn up medication consistent with psychiatric treatment." Chancellor Olaf Scholz responded to the tragedy with a strongly worded condemnation. “This is an incomprehensible act of terror,” Scholz declared. He expressed frustration over repeated violent incidents involving individuals seeking asylum in Germany. “I am tired of such acts of violence happening here every few weeks — by perpetrators who came to us to find protection here. Mistaken tolerance is inappropriate here. Authorities must clear up at high pressure why the attacker was still in Germany at all.” Scholz stressed that the attack must lead to immediate action, stating, “It is not enough to talk.” His comments come amid heightened political sensitivity, as Germany approaches a national election in which irregular migration and asylum policies are major issues. The incident also recalls previous attacks that spurred debates on Germany’s deportation policies. Earlier this year, an Afghan immigrant killed a police officer in Mannheim, while a suspected Islamic extremist from Syria was accused of killing three people in Solingen. These events have led to renewed vows by Scholz to ramp up deportations of rejected asylum-seekers, particularly those involved in criminal activity. Germany recently resumed deporting Afghan nationals to their homeland, the first such action since the Taliban regained power in 2021. This latest tragedy further amplifies calls for stricter measures to address asylum policies and ensure public safety. The Bavarian community remains in mourning as authorities work to understand how such a horrifying act could occur and take steps to prevent future tragedies. Based on a report by ABC News 2025-01-23

Nick Timothy said Starmer had executed “a cynical masterclass in obfuscation” Sir Keir Starmer has faced sharp criticism over claims that his government used contempt of court laws to obscure details of Axel Rudakubana’s terror-related past. Nick Timothy, former joint chief of staff to Theresa May and now Conservative MP for West Suffolk, accused Starmer of orchestrating a deliberate cover-up in what he described as “a cynical masterclass in obfuscation.” Timothy compared Starmer's handling of the Rudakubana case to Theresa May's transparency during incidents like the Parsons Green Tube attack in 2017. May had publicly acknowledged terror links when they were identified, while Starmer allegedly chose to withhold such details in this case. Timothy pointed to a 2017 tweet from Starmer referencing the Finsbury Park attack, where he openly extended his condolences to the victims of terrorism. He questioned why, in the Southport case, the government refrained from disclosing Rudakubana’s possession of ricin and a terror manual until much later. “The prime minister would’ve been briefed immediately when the ricin and the terror manual were discovered,” Timothy asserted. “They made the decision not to share that information with the public, and even Angela Rayner called any link to terror ‘fake news.’ I assume they were worried about a public reaction. They would have assumed he was a Muslim, but you cannot cover up details because you need to be transparent.” Timothy further criticized the government’s approach, arguing that withholding the truth fueled conspiracy theories. “The prime minister doesn’t understand that truth is the antidote to conspiracy,” he said. “Those details were released in October anyway and didn’t jeopardize the trial, whatever the prime minister says today.” Serena Kennedy, chief constable of Merseyside Police, revealed that her force had wanted to share more information about the Southport case earlier but was advised against it by prosecutors. Similarly, Matt Jukes, the head of UK counterterrorism policing, expressed a similar stance, suggesting legal guidance prevented timely disclosures. Journalists also expressed frustration over the lack of transparency. The Daily Mail’s crime and security editor noted a “worrying pattern” of law enforcement agencies being instructed to remain silent in high-profile cases. After Rudakubana pleaded guilty, reporters pressed for the full background of the case to be revealed, citing public interest in understanding the terror connections. Critics argue that the government’s reluctance to disclose key details at the appropriate time undermines trust and raises questions about the use of legal mechanisms to manage public perception. The accusations against Starmer underscore a broader debate over the balance between legal constraints and transparency in cases involving national security, with many calling for greater openness to ensure public confidence in the justice system. Based on a report by The Times 2025-01-23

The stereotype of the “stupid footballer” is far from accurate, according to a recent study that sheds light on the cognitive capabilities of professional players. Scientists from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden and Oxford University have assessed the cognitive function of footballers and found them to be exceptionally clever. Predrag Petrovic, a researcher involved in the study, emphasized, “These are super-clever individuals in terms of how their brain works. Maybe some of them are not as schooled, but you absolutely cannot dismiss their brains.” This research counters the age-old cliché that the best use of a footballer’s head is simply to hit the ball. Petrovic and his team tested 200 professional players from Brazil and Sweden, evaluating various cognitive abilities such as working memory, executive function, and problem-solving. Remarkably, the footballers consistently outperformed the average person, indicating a high level of cognitive proficiency. Leonardo Bonetti, a co-author of the study from Oxford University, explained that football inherently involves complex problem-solving skills. “When you want to dribble, you need to see very quickly what the defensive player is doing and be faster. If you are a midfielder, you need to plan properly, see the right path, anticipate how defensive players move, then take a decision to calibrate a pass.” These cognitive demands are reflected in the players’ test performances, which placed them in the 90th percentile—equivalent to an IQ of 120 to 130. The study also highlighted the players’ exceptional cognitive flexibility, placing them among the top 1 to 2 percent worldwide in such tests. Petrovic noted, “It is striking how good they are. They belong to the 1 to 2 percent of the best in the world in these tests. These are super-clever individuals.” Despite these findings, the stereotype of the unintelligent footballer persists, partly due to some infamous moments off the pitch. Instances like Jack Grealish struggling to identify England on a map or Mohammed Anas awkwardly thanking both his wife and girlfriend in a post-match interview fuel this misconception. However, Petrovic argues that these anecdotes should not overshadow the players’ intellectual prowess on the field. He stated, “When you speak to these players, they explain how they are always thinking about the next move, about where the space is, several steps ahead. They need to do those types of calculations all the time.” The stereotype of the dim footballer is not confined to the UK. Bonetti mentioned that in Italy, football players are often viewed as lacking intelligence. Similarly, German manager Hans Meyer once remarked, “In every squad there are five really stupid players. One of them would absolutely live under a bridge if he didn’t play football.” Bonetti believes this misconception stems from the educational background of many players. “Even if they are clever, they are not educated. Most stop at high school, possibly before. This might be related to lower knowledge, not lower intelligence.” Gregor Robertson, a former professional footballer turned journalist for The Times, expressed hope that the study would change public perceptions. “Am I surprised by the findings of this study? Not in the slightest. It’s the capacity to acquire skills and detailed understanding—to learn—that makes elite footballers the very best players of the most popular sport on the planet. The stereotype of the dullard footballer is as old as the hills, but formal education is not the only barometer of intelligence.” David Beckham once famously remarked about his son, “I definitely want Brooklyn to be christened, but I don’t know into what religion yet,” a statement often cited as evidence of footballers' supposed lack of intellect. However, this study suggests it’s time to reconsider such stereotypes and recognize the impressive cognitive abilities these athletes possess. Based on a report by The Times 2025-01-23

Donald Trump's re-election as the 47th (and also 45th) president of the United States sparked a wave of mixed emotions across the Atlantic. For some Britons, his return to the Oval Office seemed to highlight the inadequacies of their own government, particularly under the leadership of Keir Starmer's Labour Party. Trump's bold promises, such as putting a man on Mars, stood in stark contrast to what many in Britain perceive as their government’s inability to prioritize national interests. The inauguration, filled with its usual flair, had Britons looking on with a mix of awe and envy. Trump’s signing of executive orders, aimed at restructuring the nation, left some British onlookers wishing for a similar figure who would unapologetically place their country’s needs first. One could hear the collective cry, “Please can that man be Keir Starmer?” as they longed for a leader who exudes confidence and assertiveness. On social media, the sentiment of looking forward to Trump humiliating the Labour government resonated with many. Comments poured in, expressing eager anticipation. "Honestly, it’s the only bit of good news we have to look forward to at the moment," said one user, reflecting the widespread disillusionment. Another remarked, “Never in my life could I have dreamt of wishing a foreign state would heap humiliation on our own country’s leader. Yet this is what we have been reduced to.” Tina, one respondent, went as far as expressing hope that Trump might label the Labour Party as a terrorist organization, showcasing the depth of frustration among some segments of the British population. This, however, underscores a broader issue where foreign influence is seen as a necessary corrective to domestic policy failures. Critics of the Labour government accuse it of economic mismanagement, contributing to a hostile environment for the wealthy and leading to an exodus of millionaires, which in turn impacts the nation's tax revenues. The refusal to exploit natural resources, coupled with porous borders and a lenient justice system, are seen as further acts of treachery against the country’s well-being. The idea that envy of Trump’s America might be considered treasonous by some is met with skepticism. For those disenchanted with their current leadership, Trump's decisive actions—banning net zero initiatives, tightening border control, and committing to free speech—represent a model of governance they yearn for. Even the symbolic return of Winston Churchill’s bust to the Oval Office was seen as a nod to values that many feel have been neglected in Britain. Trump’s inaugural spectacle, from Melania’s striking outfit to Barron Trump’s towering presence, encapsulated the grandeur and assertiveness that some Britons feel is missing in their political landscape. Figures like JD Vance, who embodies the American Dream, further fueled the longing for leadership that champions the working class and eschews politically correct quotas in favor of natural diversity. In Trump’s first 24 hours, executive orders promising abundant energy, tighter borders, and a rollback on progressive policies presented a stark contrast to Britain’s path. For some, it seemed that Britain might benefit from a similar approach, even if that meant metaphorically joining the United States as its 51st state. As Britain watches from the sidelines, the yearning for a Trump-like figure to lead with boldness and a clear agenda grows among those dissatisfied with their current political climate. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

In a controversial move, Donald Trump has instructed all federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) staff to be placed on paid leave, with plans for eventual layoffs. This decision is part of a broader agenda to dismantle diversity-focused initiatives across the federal government, a hallmark of his administration's policy shifts since returning to office. The directive stems from an executive order signed on the president's first day, which overturned protections established by President Lyndon Johnson. These protections had safeguarded workers from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and national origin. Trump's order also encourages private companies to “end illegal DEI discrimination and preferences,” signaling his intention to reshape both public and private sector approaches to diversity. The Office of Personnel Management has ordered all federal agencies to comply with these new directives. Agencies must place DEI staff on paid leave, remove any publicly available DEI-focused resources from their websites, and cancel all DEI-related training sessions by 5 p.m. Wednesday. These sweeping measures reflect Trump's commitment to what he has called a "new golden age" for the United States. Seeking to make an immediate impact, Trump has issued a flurry of executive orders targeting immigration, gender policies, and climate regulations. Many of these actions have systematically reversed policies implemented under the Biden administration. The president has also promised to remove over a thousand Biden-era appointees, including Admiral Linda Fagan, whom Joe Biden appointed as head of the U.S. Coast Guard in 2022. Trump dismissed Fagan on Tuesday, accusing her of an "excessive focus on diversity policies." In another significant step, the State Department has removed the “selecting your gender marker” page from its website. Previously, individuals applying for or updating passports could choose from male (M), female (F), or unspecified/another gender identity (X). Now, the page redirects to general passport information. This change follows Trump’s executive order requiring all government agencies to ensure that official documents, such as passports and visas, “accurately reflect the holder’s sex.” The administration has declared that the U.S. government will recognize only two sexes, male and female, as part of a broader campaign to eliminate what it describes as “radical and wasteful” DEI initiatives. Heralding these changes as part of his vision for a revitalized America, Trump has emphasized his intent to undo policies he perceives as divisive or inefficient. However, critics argue that these moves undermine decades of progress in promoting equality and inclusion. As debates rage over the implications of these measures, the president remains resolute, declaring these actions essential to restoring what he views as America’s foundational values. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

Prince Harry has achieved what his legal team is calling a "monumental victory" in his privacy invasion case against News Group Newspapers (NGN), the publisher of *The Sun*. The case, set to launch into a weeks-long trial, was settled on the opening day in a development described as extraordinary. This outcome has garnered attention not only for its implications but also for the strong statements it has inspired. David Sherborne, Prince Harry's lawyer, echoed these sentiments, calling for broader investigations into NGN’s "illegal actions and its blatant disregard for the law." He urged the police and Parliament to probe not only the unlawful practices but also the "perjury and cover-ups" associated with the case. Exposing the Truth Sherborne revealed that NGN unlawfully employed over 100 private investigators on more than 35,000 occasions across 16 years. These actions were allegedly known to editors and executives, forming what Sherborne described as an "extensive conspiracy" to cover up the misconduct. He also noted that many individuals implicated in these activities remain in senior positions within News UK and other global media outlets. The lawyer praised the resilience of both Prince Harry and Lord Watson, stating that their persistence led to a "historic admission" from NGN, despite the company’s longstanding denials and resistance. A Milestone for Prince Harry Prince Harry’s settlement with NGN includes "substantial damages," accompanied by an apology acknowledging the distress caused by the invasive actions of journalists and investigators. While NGN has admitted to unlawful practices associated with its now-defunct *News of the World*, it continues to deny allegations of phone hacking at *The Sun*. This point remains unresolved in the settlement, despite being a key aspect of Prince Harry’s case. Royal commentator Jennie Bond reflected on the significance of the outcome, describing it as a "huge victory" for the Duke of Sussex. "He wanted his day in court, but he’s got the apology he sought without the prolonged ordeal of a ten-week trial," Bond noted, adding that the resolution allows Prince Harry to move forward with his life. Wider Implications This case was one of three legal battles Prince Harry has launched against British tabloids, accusing them of privacy violations. In a previous victory, the court ruled that phone hacking was "widespread and habitual" at the *Daily Mirror*. These cases highlight ongoing issues within certain corners of the press, raising questions about journalistic ethics and the protection of individuals' privacy. With this settlement, Prince Harry has not only secured a personal triumph but also shone a light on the systemic issues within the media. As his legal team and supporters have emphasized, this outcome serves as a reminder that no one is above the rule of law, regardless of power or influence. Based on a report by Sky News 2025-01-23

Australian federal police are delving into the possibility that antisemitic crimes in the country may be funded by "overseas actors or individuals." This investigation comes amid a rise in such incidents, the most recent being the arson and vandalism of a childcare center in Sydney, marked by anti-Jewish graffiti. Thankfully, no injuries were reported. In response to the escalating situation, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese convened an emergency cabinet meeting, resulting in the decision to establish a national database for tracking antisemitic incidents. Since the federal police task force's formation in December, more than 166 reports of antisemitic crimes have been filed. In addition to tracing funding sources, the police are investigating whether young individuals have been radicalized online to commit these crimes. However, Commissioner Kershaw warned that while intelligence is being gathered, it does not equate to concrete evidence, although more charges are anticipated shortly. The task force, named Special Operation Avalite, recently made its first arrest. A Sydney man was charged with making death threats against a Jewish organization. This marks a significant step in addressing the series of antisemitic crimes. Prime Minister Albanese condemned the attack on the childcare center, located in Maroubra, a suburb of eastern Sydney. He labeled it "as cowardly as it is disgusting" and unequivocally a "hate crime." In a statement on social media, he emphasized the broader implications of such acts, stating, "This was an attack targeted at the Jewish community. And it is a crime that concerns us all because it is also an attack on the nation and society we have built together." The rise in antisemitic crimes has shaken the community and prompted a robust response from law enforcement and government officials alike. As investigations continue, the focus remains on uncovering the roots of these acts and preventing further incidents to uphold the values of inclusivity and safety in Australian society. Based on a report by BBC 2025-01-23

A candid moment between former U.S. Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush at Donald Trump’s inauguration has sparked widespread intrigue online, with internet sleuths scrambling to decode what was said during their brief exchange inside the Capitol Rotunda. A clip of the two leaders sharing a laugh has gone viral, and according to Jackie Gonzalez, a self-proclaimed expert in lip reading, the interaction may have been more revealing than it appeared. Jackie Gonzalez, who identifies herself as the “human hot mic,” claims to have mastered the art of interpreting conversations from video footage without sound. With over 2.3 million followers across social media, she has built a reputation for decrypting silent exchanges involving high-profile figures, including Taylor Swift, Paul Mescal, and Vice President Kamala Harris. Her assertion about the Obama-Bush exchange has further fueled discussions about the relationship between the former presidents and their reactions to the political shift symbolized by Trump’s inauguration. The viral moment is not the first instance of camaraderie between Mr. Obama and Mr. Bush. Despite their political differences, the two have shared a notably friendly rapport in recent years. Just weeks ago, at former President Jimmy Carter’s funeral, Mr. Bush playfully patted Mr. Obama’s chest in a lighthearted gesture that captured the warmth of their relationship. In the clip from Trump’s inauguration, Mr. Bush was accompanied by his wife, Laura Bush, while Mr. Obama attended without his wife, Michelle Obama. Mrs. Obama, who also skipped Jimmy Carter’s funeral, was later reported to be on vacation in Hawaii at the time. Though lighthearted, the viral exchange has prompted a variety of interpretations and debates about the meaning behind Mr. Obama’s alleged remark and the laughter it evoked from Mr. Bush. As the video continues to circulate online, it highlights not only the enduring curiosity surrounding public figures but also the unexpected moments of levity that can occur even during the most formal occasions. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

J.K. Rowling has publicly voiced her support for former U.S. President Donald Trump's controversial crackdown on transgender and gender identity rights, aligning herself with his stance that challenges what she calls the Left’s "calamity" over embracing "gender identity ideology." The renowned author of the Harry Potter series has become a polarizing figure in recent years for her outspoken views on gender issues, and her latest remarks have only intensified the debate. Trump, following his inauguration and return to the White House, signed several executive orders on his first day back in office, making waves both domestically and internationally. Among the orders was a directive to officially recognize only two sexes—male and female—as "immutable biological classifications." He also instructed federal agencies to use the term "sex" in place of "gender" and mandated that identification documents, including passports and visas, reflect an individual’s biological sex rather than their gender identity. Additionally, Trump’s administration ordered an end to federal funding for programs promoting what he termed "gender ideology." While Trump’s actions drew fierce criticism from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and activists, Rowling emerged as an unexpected supporter. In a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, the author wrote: "A noisy part of the Left still refuses to step outside their sex-is-a-social-construct bubble and acknowledge that their embrace of gender identity ideology has been a calamity. They were warned the right was capitalizing on their betrayal of women and girls. They didn't listen." Her comments reflect her ongoing criticism of what she perceives as the undermining of women’s rights by progressive gender policies. Rowling’s views have sparked significant backlash in the past, but she remains a prominent voice in the cultural debate over gender identity and biological sex. Trump’s return to the White House and his swift policy moves have reignited tensions over LGBTQ+ rights in the United States. Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, issued a defiant statement in response to the orders, saying: "We refuse to back down or be intimidated. We are not going anywhere, and we will fight back against these harmful provisions with everything we've got." The divide over gender identity policies has increasingly become a flashpoint in global politics, with activists on both sides mobilizing in response to the growing prominence of these issues. For Rowling, Trump’s actions appear to validate her warnings about the consequences of progressive policies, though critics argue her stance aligns her with a movement that seeks to erode hard-won rights for transgender individuals. As the backlash to Trump’s orders grows, so too does the debate over the future of gender identity rights. For now, Rowling remains at the center of the controversy, using her platform to challenge what she views as the Left’s failure to protect women and girls in the face of evolving gender norms. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2025-01-23

King Charles III has personally congratulated President Donald Trump on his inauguration, highlighting the enduring bond between the United Kingdom and the United States. The 76-year-old monarch sent a handwritten letter to Trump, marking the beginning of his second term as the 47th president of the United States. Buckingham Palace confirmed that the private message was delivered to Trump on Monday. In his letter, King Charles reflected on the "enduring special relationship between the UK and US." Although no state visit has been scheduled yet, it's understood that the possibility remains open for later in the year. Typically, invitations for foreign political figures and monarchs to visit the UK are extended based on the advice of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, with the ultimate decision resting with the UK government. Given Trump’s strong ties to the British royal family, a visit to the UK could be on the horizon. President Trump, now 78, has expressed admiration for the British royals on numerous occasions. During his first term, he met the late Queen Elizabeth II and described having "automatic chemistry" with her. He also spoke warmly of King Charles, calling him a “really wonderful guy.” Trump’s affinity for the British monarchy was further demonstrated during his recent meeting with Prince William at the newly reopened Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. Looking ahead, there’s speculation that King Charles and Queen Camilla might receive an invitation to Washington, DC, to attend the 250th anniversary of the signing of the US Declaration of Independence next year. Such an event would further symbolize the strong ties between the two nations. Meanwhile, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer also extended his congratulations to Trump. In a statement released Monday, Starmer said, “On behalf of the United Kingdom, I send my warmest congratulations to President @realDonaldTrump on his inauguration as the forty-seventh President of the United States.” He further emphasized the importance of the UK-US bond, stating, “The special relationship between the UK and the US will continue to flourish for years to come.” This warm exchange of congratulations underscores the continued diplomatic ties and mutual respect between the UK and US leadership, setting a positive tone for future collaborations. Based on a report by NYP 2025-01-23

Russia is rearming at an unexpectedly swift pace, raising alarms about a possible attack on NATO, according to Germany’s military chief overseeing Ukrainian affairs. Major General Christian Freuding has sounded the alarm, revealing that Russia has replenished its arsenal of missiles and tanks lost during its invasion of Ukraine, signaling a rapid resurgence in military capability. Speaking to *Die Welt* newspaper on the eve of Donald Trump’s inauguration as U.S. president, Maj Gen Freuding highlighted that Russia’s military is not only compensating for its substantial losses in personnel and equipment but is also making significant strides in rearming. “The Russian armed forces are not just able to compensate for their enormous personnel and material losses… they are successfully rearming,” he asserted. The German military officer emphasized that President Vladimir Putin has realigned the Russian economy to sustain his war efforts. Moreover, Russia has secured additional supplies from allies such as Iran and North Korea, aiding in the replenishment of essential military resources, including tanks, missiles, and drones. While it remains uncertain whether Putin intends to directly target NATO, Freuding warned that the conditions for such an assault are being meticulously prepared. “Production is growing, the supplies in the depots are growing,” he noted. This revelation comes at a critical juncture for Germany, which is embroiled in a political debate over a proposed £2.5 billion aid package for Ukraine. Chancellor Olaf Scholz has stipulated that any support for Ukraine would be contingent upon relaxing stringent national borrowing rules. As this debate unfolds, the situation on the ground in Ukraine remains tense, with Russian forces encircling Pokrovsk, a strategic town in the south Donetsk region. The town of Pokrovsk, previously home to 60,000 residents, is a crucial hub for Ukraine’s military logistics, serving as a center for railway and road networks. It also hosts a vital coking coal mine, integral to Ukraine’s steel industry, the country’s second-largest export sector. Reports indicate that operations at the mine have ceased, with workers evacuated due to the advancing Russian forces. “They have all stopped working now,” confirmed a source cited by Reuters, underscoring the gravity of the situation. Meanwhile, Russian military bloggers have celebrated their advances, suggesting that these movements are reshaping international narratives. The capture of nearby Velyka Novosilka, while symbolically significant, further illustrates the extent of Russia’s territorial gains since mid-2024. In the broader geopolitical context, former President Donald Trump has expressed a desire to broker a peace deal to conclude the war in Ukraine. However, analysts believe that Putin is pushing for territorial gains to strengthen Russia's negotiating position. He has reportedly ordered his generals to intensify attacks on Ukrainian positions using "swarm infantry tactics." Despite the war-weariness among Ukrainians and growing public support for a peace deal, advisers to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have cautioned against early negotiations with Putin, labeling it a potential “catastrophic mistake.” The unfolding scenario presents a complex challenge, as international leaders grapple with strategies to address the escalating conflict while maintaining regional stability. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has urged Americans to avoid equating the pardons issued by President Donald Trump with those of former President Joe Biden, emphasizing their significant differences. During an appearance on CNN’s *The Source* on Tuesday evening, Sanders discussed the wave of executive actions taken by Trump, including pardons for individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, and how some have drawn comparisons to the pardons issued by Biden before he left office. Host Kaitlan Collins questioned Sanders on the matter, particularly highlighting Biden’s controversial decision to pardon family members. “What I think is that he was worried that, given all of Trump’s rhetoric, that [Biden] was going to go after his family and close associates,” Sanders explained. “All right, that’s a concern, but don’t equate the two.” Sanders acknowledged that there is room for debate about whether Biden’s decision to preemptively pardon his family was right or wrong. However, he insisted that the move bore no resemblance to Trump’s actions. “It has nothing to do with what Trump did today,” Sanders stated firmly. Biden’s last-minute pardons of family members marked an unprecedented use of executive power, motivated by concerns over Trump’s threats of retribution during a potential second administration. The decision caused division among Democrats, with some supporting the pardons and others expressing disapproval. After assuming office, Trump acted quickly to pardon almost all the rioters who stormed the Capitol four years ago, a move that also faced intense scrutiny. Sanders criticized Trump’s decision, particularly given his public support for law enforcement. “To tell the entire world that we’re going to pardon people who attacked and hurt police officers is telling,” Sanders remarked. “I think that is a horrible message, and I strongly disagree with his pardoning of those insurrectionists.” He pointed out that he knows of no one in Biden’s family who attempted to overthrow the U.S. government. Sanders further condemned Trump’s actions, saying, “What Trump is saying to the world is that it is okay for you to attack police officers when you have a mind to do that. And I think that is an outrageous message to send to the world.” Sanders’ remarks underscore his deep concern about the implications of Trump’s pardons, contrasting them sharply with Biden’s controversial yet fundamentally different actions. Based on a report by The Hill 2025-01-23

Another way off topic trolling post removed, this is not about other posters, it is about: David Lammy Shifts Stance on Trump, Calling Him ‘Funny, Friendly, and Warm’