Social Media

A number of off topic false and inflammatory claims have been removed along with a couple of replies to them. @tony2times A comment on moderation from the same poster also removed.

A devastating knife attack in Bavaria has left two people dead, including a two-year-old boy, and three others injured. The tragic incident unfolded in Aschaffenburg, a city of 72,000, just before noon on Wednesday. The suspect, identified as a 28-year-old Afghan national, has been apprehended. Authorities revealed that the suspect, a former asylum-seeker ordered to leave Germany, launched the attack in a park. Among his victims was a two-year-old Moroccan boy, who was part of a group of kindergarten children. Bavaria's top security official, Joachim Herrmann, disclosed that the boy was fatally stabbed with a kitchen knife. A 41-year-old German man, who appeared to intervene in an effort to protect the children, also lost his life. In addition to the fatalities, two adults and a two-year-old Syrian girl sustained injuries but are not in critical condition. Passersby acted swiftly, pursuing the attacker and aiding police in his arrest just 12 minutes after the assault. Joachim Herrmann detailed the suspect’s background, noting his prior involvement in violent incidents. "This individual had come to authorities' attention at least three times because of acts of violence," Herrmann said. Each time, the suspect underwent psychiatric treatment before being released. The suspect reportedly arrived in Germany in November 2022 and applied for asylum in early 2023. By December 4, he informed authorities of his intention to voluntarily leave the country and seek documentation from the Afghan consulate. However, his asylum application was formally denied, and he was instructed to leave Germany shortly thereafter. Investigators are now working to uncover the motive behind the attack, with early findings pointing to the suspect’s psychiatric condition. Herrmann stated, "A search of his room at a refugee home revealed no evidence of radical Islamic views, but it did turn up medication consistent with psychiatric treatment." Chancellor Olaf Scholz responded to the tragedy with a strongly worded condemnation. “This is an incomprehensible act of terror,” Scholz declared. He expressed frustration over repeated violent incidents involving individuals seeking asylum in Germany. “I am tired of such acts of violence happening here every few weeks — by perpetrators who came to us to find protection here. Mistaken tolerance is inappropriate here. Authorities must clear up at high pressure why the attacker was still in Germany at all.” Scholz stressed that the attack must lead to immediate action, stating, “It is not enough to talk.” His comments come amid heightened political sensitivity, as Germany approaches a national election in which irregular migration and asylum policies are major issues. The incident also recalls previous attacks that spurred debates on Germany’s deportation policies. Earlier this year, an Afghan immigrant killed a police officer in Mannheim, while a suspected Islamic extremist from Syria was accused of killing three people in Solingen. These events have led to renewed vows by Scholz to ramp up deportations of rejected asylum-seekers, particularly those involved in criminal activity. Germany recently resumed deporting Afghan nationals to their homeland, the first such action since the Taliban regained power in 2021. This latest tragedy further amplifies calls for stricter measures to address asylum policies and ensure public safety. The Bavarian community remains in mourning as authorities work to understand how such a horrifying act could occur and take steps to prevent future tragedies. Based on a report by ABC News 2025-01-23

Nick Timothy said Starmer had executed “a cynical masterclass in obfuscation” Sir Keir Starmer has faced sharp criticism over claims that his government used contempt of court laws to obscure details of Axel Rudakubana’s terror-related past. Nick Timothy, former joint chief of staff to Theresa May and now Conservative MP for West Suffolk, accused Starmer of orchestrating a deliberate cover-up in what he described as “a cynical masterclass in obfuscation.” Timothy compared Starmer's handling of the Rudakubana case to Theresa May's transparency during incidents like the Parsons Green Tube attack in 2017. May had publicly acknowledged terror links when they were identified, while Starmer allegedly chose to withhold such details in this case. Timothy pointed to a 2017 tweet from Starmer referencing the Finsbury Park attack, where he openly extended his condolences to the victims of terrorism. He questioned why, in the Southport case, the government refrained from disclosing Rudakubana’s possession of ricin and a terror manual until much later. “The prime minister would’ve been briefed immediately when the ricin and the terror manual were discovered,” Timothy asserted. “They made the decision not to share that information with the public, and even Angela Rayner called any link to terror ‘fake news.’ I assume they were worried about a public reaction. They would have assumed he was a Muslim, but you cannot cover up details because you need to be transparent.” Timothy further criticized the government’s approach, arguing that withholding the truth fueled conspiracy theories. “The prime minister doesn’t understand that truth is the antidote to conspiracy,” he said. “Those details were released in October anyway and didn’t jeopardize the trial, whatever the prime minister says today.” Serena Kennedy, chief constable of Merseyside Police, revealed that her force had wanted to share more information about the Southport case earlier but was advised against it by prosecutors. Similarly, Matt Jukes, the head of UK counterterrorism policing, expressed a similar stance, suggesting legal guidance prevented timely disclosures. Journalists also expressed frustration over the lack of transparency. The Daily Mail’s crime and security editor noted a “worrying pattern” of law enforcement agencies being instructed to remain silent in high-profile cases. After Rudakubana pleaded guilty, reporters pressed for the full background of the case to be revealed, citing public interest in understanding the terror connections. Critics argue that the government’s reluctance to disclose key details at the appropriate time undermines trust and raises questions about the use of legal mechanisms to manage public perception. The accusations against Starmer underscore a broader debate over the balance between legal constraints and transparency in cases involving national security, with many calling for greater openness to ensure public confidence in the justice system. Based on a report by The Times 2025-01-23

The stereotype of the “stupid footballer” is far from accurate, according to a recent study that sheds light on the cognitive capabilities of professional players. Scientists from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden and Oxford University have assessed the cognitive function of footballers and found them to be exceptionally clever. Predrag Petrovic, a researcher involved in the study, emphasized, “These are super-clever individuals in terms of how their brain works. Maybe some of them are not as schooled, but you absolutely cannot dismiss their brains.” This research counters the age-old cliché that the best use of a footballer’s head is simply to hit the ball. Petrovic and his team tested 200 professional players from Brazil and Sweden, evaluating various cognitive abilities such as working memory, executive function, and problem-solving. Remarkably, the footballers consistently outperformed the average person, indicating a high level of cognitive proficiency. Leonardo Bonetti, a co-author of the study from Oxford University, explained that football inherently involves complex problem-solving skills. “When you want to dribble, you need to see very quickly what the defensive player is doing and be faster. If you are a midfielder, you need to plan properly, see the right path, anticipate how defensive players move, then take a decision to calibrate a pass.” These cognitive demands are reflected in the players’ test performances, which placed them in the 90th percentile—equivalent to an IQ of 120 to 130. The study also highlighted the players’ exceptional cognitive flexibility, placing them among the top 1 to 2 percent worldwide in such tests. Petrovic noted, “It is striking how good they are. They belong to the 1 to 2 percent of the best in the world in these tests. These are super-clever individuals.” Despite these findings, the stereotype of the unintelligent footballer persists, partly due to some infamous moments off the pitch. Instances like Jack Grealish struggling to identify England on a map or Mohammed Anas awkwardly thanking both his wife and girlfriend in a post-match interview fuel this misconception. However, Petrovic argues that these anecdotes should not overshadow the players’ intellectual prowess on the field. He stated, “When you speak to these players, they explain how they are always thinking about the next move, about where the space is, several steps ahead. They need to do those types of calculations all the time.” The stereotype of the dim footballer is not confined to the UK. Bonetti mentioned that in Italy, football players are often viewed as lacking intelligence. Similarly, German manager Hans Meyer once remarked, “In every squad there are five really stupid players. One of them would absolutely live under a bridge if he didn’t play football.” Bonetti believes this misconception stems from the educational background of many players. “Even if they are clever, they are not educated. Most stop at high school, possibly before. This might be related to lower knowledge, not lower intelligence.” Gregor Robertson, a former professional footballer turned journalist for The Times, expressed hope that the study would change public perceptions. “Am I surprised by the findings of this study? Not in the slightest. It’s the capacity to acquire skills and detailed understanding—to learn—that makes elite footballers the very best players of the most popular sport on the planet. The stereotype of the dullard footballer is as old as the hills, but formal education is not the only barometer of intelligence.” David Beckham once famously remarked about his son, “I definitely want Brooklyn to be christened, but I don’t know into what religion yet,” a statement often cited as evidence of footballers' supposed lack of intellect. However, this study suggests it’s time to reconsider such stereotypes and recognize the impressive cognitive abilities these athletes possess. Based on a report by The Times 2025-01-23

Donald Trump's re-election as the 47th (and also 45th) president of the United States sparked a wave of mixed emotions across the Atlantic. For some Britons, his return to the Oval Office seemed to highlight the inadequacies of their own government, particularly under the leadership of Keir Starmer's Labour Party. Trump's bold promises, such as putting a man on Mars, stood in stark contrast to what many in Britain perceive as their government’s inability to prioritize national interests. The inauguration, filled with its usual flair, had Britons looking on with a mix of awe and envy. Trump’s signing of executive orders, aimed at restructuring the nation, left some British onlookers wishing for a similar figure who would unapologetically place their country’s needs first. One could hear the collective cry, “Please can that man be Keir Starmer?” as they longed for a leader who exudes confidence and assertiveness. On social media, the sentiment of looking forward to Trump humiliating the Labour government resonated with many. Comments poured in, expressing eager anticipation. "Honestly, it’s the only bit of good news we have to look forward to at the moment," said one user, reflecting the widespread disillusionment. Another remarked, “Never in my life could I have dreamt of wishing a foreign state would heap humiliation on our own country’s leader. Yet this is what we have been reduced to.” Tina, one respondent, went as far as expressing hope that Trump might label the Labour Party as a terrorist organization, showcasing the depth of frustration among some segments of the British population. This, however, underscores a broader issue where foreign influence is seen as a necessary corrective to domestic policy failures. Critics of the Labour government accuse it of economic mismanagement, contributing to a hostile environment for the wealthy and leading to an exodus of millionaires, which in turn impacts the nation's tax revenues. The refusal to exploit natural resources, coupled with porous borders and a lenient justice system, are seen as further acts of treachery against the country’s well-being. The idea that envy of Trump’s America might be considered treasonous by some is met with skepticism. For those disenchanted with their current leadership, Trump's decisive actions—banning net zero initiatives, tightening border control, and committing to free speech—represent a model of governance they yearn for. Even the symbolic return of Winston Churchill’s bust to the Oval Office was seen as a nod to values that many feel have been neglected in Britain. Trump’s inaugural spectacle, from Melania’s striking outfit to Barron Trump’s towering presence, encapsulated the grandeur and assertiveness that some Britons feel is missing in their political landscape. Figures like JD Vance, who embodies the American Dream, further fueled the longing for leadership that champions the working class and eschews politically correct quotas in favor of natural diversity. In Trump’s first 24 hours, executive orders promising abundant energy, tighter borders, and a rollback on progressive policies presented a stark contrast to Britain’s path. For some, it seemed that Britain might benefit from a similar approach, even if that meant metaphorically joining the United States as its 51st state. As Britain watches from the sidelines, the yearning for a Trump-like figure to lead with boldness and a clear agenda grows among those dissatisfied with their current political climate. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

In a controversial move, Donald Trump has instructed all federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) staff to be placed on paid leave, with plans for eventual layoffs. This decision is part of a broader agenda to dismantle diversity-focused initiatives across the federal government, a hallmark of his administration's policy shifts since returning to office. The directive stems from an executive order signed on the president's first day, which overturned protections established by President Lyndon Johnson. These protections had safeguarded workers from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and national origin. Trump's order also encourages private companies to “end illegal DEI discrimination and preferences,” signaling his intention to reshape both public and private sector approaches to diversity. The Office of Personnel Management has ordered all federal agencies to comply with these new directives. Agencies must place DEI staff on paid leave, remove any publicly available DEI-focused resources from their websites, and cancel all DEI-related training sessions by 5 p.m. Wednesday. These sweeping measures reflect Trump's commitment to what he has called a "new golden age" for the United States. Seeking to make an immediate impact, Trump has issued a flurry of executive orders targeting immigration, gender policies, and climate regulations. Many of these actions have systematically reversed policies implemented under the Biden administration. The president has also promised to remove over a thousand Biden-era appointees, including Admiral Linda Fagan, whom Joe Biden appointed as head of the U.S. Coast Guard in 2022. Trump dismissed Fagan on Tuesday, accusing her of an "excessive focus on diversity policies." In another significant step, the State Department has removed the “selecting your gender marker” page from its website. Previously, individuals applying for or updating passports could choose from male (M), female (F), or unspecified/another gender identity (X). Now, the page redirects to general passport information. This change follows Trump’s executive order requiring all government agencies to ensure that official documents, such as passports and visas, “accurately reflect the holder’s sex.” The administration has declared that the U.S. government will recognize only two sexes, male and female, as part of a broader campaign to eliminate what it describes as “radical and wasteful” DEI initiatives. Heralding these changes as part of his vision for a revitalized America, Trump has emphasized his intent to undo policies he perceives as divisive or inefficient. However, critics argue that these moves undermine decades of progress in promoting equality and inclusion. As debates rage over the implications of these measures, the president remains resolute, declaring these actions essential to restoring what he views as America’s foundational values. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

Prince Harry has achieved what his legal team is calling a "monumental victory" in his privacy invasion case against News Group Newspapers (NGN), the publisher of *The Sun*. The case, set to launch into a weeks-long trial, was settled on the opening day in a development described as extraordinary. This outcome has garnered attention not only for its implications but also for the strong statements it has inspired. David Sherborne, Prince Harry's lawyer, echoed these sentiments, calling for broader investigations into NGN’s "illegal actions and its blatant disregard for the law." He urged the police and Parliament to probe not only the unlawful practices but also the "perjury and cover-ups" associated with the case. Exposing the Truth Sherborne revealed that NGN unlawfully employed over 100 private investigators on more than 35,000 occasions across 16 years. These actions were allegedly known to editors and executives, forming what Sherborne described as an "extensive conspiracy" to cover up the misconduct. He also noted that many individuals implicated in these activities remain in senior positions within News UK and other global media outlets. The lawyer praised the resilience of both Prince Harry and Lord Watson, stating that their persistence led to a "historic admission" from NGN, despite the company’s longstanding denials and resistance. A Milestone for Prince Harry Prince Harry’s settlement with NGN includes "substantial damages," accompanied by an apology acknowledging the distress caused by the invasive actions of journalists and investigators. While NGN has admitted to unlawful practices associated with its now-defunct *News of the World*, it continues to deny allegations of phone hacking at *The Sun*. This point remains unresolved in the settlement, despite being a key aspect of Prince Harry’s case. Royal commentator Jennie Bond reflected on the significance of the outcome, describing it as a "huge victory" for the Duke of Sussex. "He wanted his day in court, but he’s got the apology he sought without the prolonged ordeal of a ten-week trial," Bond noted, adding that the resolution allows Prince Harry to move forward with his life. Wider Implications This case was one of three legal battles Prince Harry has launched against British tabloids, accusing them of privacy violations. In a previous victory, the court ruled that phone hacking was "widespread and habitual" at the *Daily Mirror*. These cases highlight ongoing issues within certain corners of the press, raising questions about journalistic ethics and the protection of individuals' privacy. With this settlement, Prince Harry has not only secured a personal triumph but also shone a light on the systemic issues within the media. As his legal team and supporters have emphasized, this outcome serves as a reminder that no one is above the rule of law, regardless of power or influence. Based on a report by Sky News 2025-01-23

Australian federal police are delving into the possibility that antisemitic crimes in the country may be funded by "overseas actors or individuals." This investigation comes amid a rise in such incidents, the most recent being the arson and vandalism of a childcare center in Sydney, marked by anti-Jewish graffiti. Thankfully, no injuries were reported. In response to the escalating situation, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese convened an emergency cabinet meeting, resulting in the decision to establish a national database for tracking antisemitic incidents. Since the federal police task force's formation in December, more than 166 reports of antisemitic crimes have been filed. In addition to tracing funding sources, the police are investigating whether young individuals have been radicalized online to commit these crimes. However, Commissioner Kershaw warned that while intelligence is being gathered, it does not equate to concrete evidence, although more charges are anticipated shortly. The task force, named Special Operation Avalite, recently made its first arrest. A Sydney man was charged with making death threats against a Jewish organization. This marks a significant step in addressing the series of antisemitic crimes. Prime Minister Albanese condemned the attack on the childcare center, located in Maroubra, a suburb of eastern Sydney. He labeled it "as cowardly as it is disgusting" and unequivocally a "hate crime." In a statement on social media, he emphasized the broader implications of such acts, stating, "This was an attack targeted at the Jewish community. And it is a crime that concerns us all because it is also an attack on the nation and society we have built together." The rise in antisemitic crimes has shaken the community and prompted a robust response from law enforcement and government officials alike. As investigations continue, the focus remains on uncovering the roots of these acts and preventing further incidents to uphold the values of inclusivity and safety in Australian society. Based on a report by BBC 2025-01-23

A candid moment between former U.S. Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush at Donald Trump’s inauguration has sparked widespread intrigue online, with internet sleuths scrambling to decode what was said during their brief exchange inside the Capitol Rotunda. A clip of the two leaders sharing a laugh has gone viral, and according to Jackie Gonzalez, a self-proclaimed expert in lip reading, the interaction may have been more revealing than it appeared. Jackie Gonzalez, who identifies herself as the “human hot mic,” claims to have mastered the art of interpreting conversations from video footage without sound. With over 2.3 million followers across social media, she has built a reputation for decrypting silent exchanges involving high-profile figures, including Taylor Swift, Paul Mescal, and Vice President Kamala Harris. Her assertion about the Obama-Bush exchange has further fueled discussions about the relationship between the former presidents and their reactions to the political shift symbolized by Trump’s inauguration. The viral moment is not the first instance of camaraderie between Mr. Obama and Mr. Bush. Despite their political differences, the two have shared a notably friendly rapport in recent years. Just weeks ago, at former President Jimmy Carter’s funeral, Mr. Bush playfully patted Mr. Obama’s chest in a lighthearted gesture that captured the warmth of their relationship. In the clip from Trump’s inauguration, Mr. Bush was accompanied by his wife, Laura Bush, while Mr. Obama attended without his wife, Michelle Obama. Mrs. Obama, who also skipped Jimmy Carter’s funeral, was later reported to be on vacation in Hawaii at the time. Though lighthearted, the viral exchange has prompted a variety of interpretations and debates about the meaning behind Mr. Obama’s alleged remark and the laughter it evoked from Mr. Bush. As the video continues to circulate online, it highlights not only the enduring curiosity surrounding public figures but also the unexpected moments of levity that can occur even during the most formal occasions. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

J.K. Rowling has publicly voiced her support for former U.S. President Donald Trump's controversial crackdown on transgender and gender identity rights, aligning herself with his stance that challenges what she calls the Left’s "calamity" over embracing "gender identity ideology." The renowned author of the Harry Potter series has become a polarizing figure in recent years for her outspoken views on gender issues, and her latest remarks have only intensified the debate. Trump, following his inauguration and return to the White House, signed several executive orders on his first day back in office, making waves both domestically and internationally. Among the orders was a directive to officially recognize only two sexes—male and female—as "immutable biological classifications." He also instructed federal agencies to use the term "sex" in place of "gender" and mandated that identification documents, including passports and visas, reflect an individual’s biological sex rather than their gender identity. Additionally, Trump’s administration ordered an end to federal funding for programs promoting what he termed "gender ideology." While Trump’s actions drew fierce criticism from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and activists, Rowling emerged as an unexpected supporter. In a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, the author wrote: "A noisy part of the Left still refuses to step outside their sex-is-a-social-construct bubble and acknowledge that their embrace of gender identity ideology has been a calamity. They were warned the right was capitalizing on their betrayal of women and girls. They didn't listen." Her comments reflect her ongoing criticism of what she perceives as the undermining of women’s rights by progressive gender policies. Rowling’s views have sparked significant backlash in the past, but she remains a prominent voice in the cultural debate over gender identity and biological sex. Trump’s return to the White House and his swift policy moves have reignited tensions over LGBTQ+ rights in the United States. Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, issued a defiant statement in response to the orders, saying: "We refuse to back down or be intimidated. We are not going anywhere, and we will fight back against these harmful provisions with everything we've got." The divide over gender identity policies has increasingly become a flashpoint in global politics, with activists on both sides mobilizing in response to the growing prominence of these issues. For Rowling, Trump’s actions appear to validate her warnings about the consequences of progressive policies, though critics argue her stance aligns her with a movement that seeks to erode hard-won rights for transgender individuals. As the backlash to Trump’s orders grows, so too does the debate over the future of gender identity rights. For now, Rowling remains at the center of the controversy, using her platform to challenge what she views as the Left’s failure to protect women and girls in the face of evolving gender norms. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2025-01-23

King Charles III has personally congratulated President Donald Trump on his inauguration, highlighting the enduring bond between the United Kingdom and the United States. The 76-year-old monarch sent a handwritten letter to Trump, marking the beginning of his second term as the 47th president of the United States. Buckingham Palace confirmed that the private message was delivered to Trump on Monday. In his letter, King Charles reflected on the "enduring special relationship between the UK and US." Although no state visit has been scheduled yet, it's understood that the possibility remains open for later in the year. Typically, invitations for foreign political figures and monarchs to visit the UK are extended based on the advice of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, with the ultimate decision resting with the UK government. Given Trump’s strong ties to the British royal family, a visit to the UK could be on the horizon. President Trump, now 78, has expressed admiration for the British royals on numerous occasions. During his first term, he met the late Queen Elizabeth II and described having "automatic chemistry" with her. He also spoke warmly of King Charles, calling him a “really wonderful guy.” Trump’s affinity for the British monarchy was further demonstrated during his recent meeting with Prince William at the newly reopened Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. Looking ahead, there’s speculation that King Charles and Queen Camilla might receive an invitation to Washington, DC, to attend the 250th anniversary of the signing of the US Declaration of Independence next year. Such an event would further symbolize the strong ties between the two nations. Meanwhile, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer also extended his congratulations to Trump. In a statement released Monday, Starmer said, “On behalf of the United Kingdom, I send my warmest congratulations to President @realDonaldTrump on his inauguration as the forty-seventh President of the United States.” He further emphasized the importance of the UK-US bond, stating, “The special relationship between the UK and the US will continue to flourish for years to come.” This warm exchange of congratulations underscores the continued diplomatic ties and mutual respect between the UK and US leadership, setting a positive tone for future collaborations. Based on a report by NYP 2025-01-23

Russia is rearming at an unexpectedly swift pace, raising alarms about a possible attack on NATO, according to Germany’s military chief overseeing Ukrainian affairs. Major General Christian Freuding has sounded the alarm, revealing that Russia has replenished its arsenal of missiles and tanks lost during its invasion of Ukraine, signaling a rapid resurgence in military capability. Speaking to *Die Welt* newspaper on the eve of Donald Trump’s inauguration as U.S. president, Maj Gen Freuding highlighted that Russia’s military is not only compensating for its substantial losses in personnel and equipment but is also making significant strides in rearming. “The Russian armed forces are not just able to compensate for their enormous personnel and material losses… they are successfully rearming,” he asserted. The German military officer emphasized that President Vladimir Putin has realigned the Russian economy to sustain his war efforts. Moreover, Russia has secured additional supplies from allies such as Iran and North Korea, aiding in the replenishment of essential military resources, including tanks, missiles, and drones. While it remains uncertain whether Putin intends to directly target NATO, Freuding warned that the conditions for such an assault are being meticulously prepared. “Production is growing, the supplies in the depots are growing,” he noted. This revelation comes at a critical juncture for Germany, which is embroiled in a political debate over a proposed £2.5 billion aid package for Ukraine. Chancellor Olaf Scholz has stipulated that any support for Ukraine would be contingent upon relaxing stringent national borrowing rules. As this debate unfolds, the situation on the ground in Ukraine remains tense, with Russian forces encircling Pokrovsk, a strategic town in the south Donetsk region. The town of Pokrovsk, previously home to 60,000 residents, is a crucial hub for Ukraine’s military logistics, serving as a center for railway and road networks. It also hosts a vital coking coal mine, integral to Ukraine’s steel industry, the country’s second-largest export sector. Reports indicate that operations at the mine have ceased, with workers evacuated due to the advancing Russian forces. “They have all stopped working now,” confirmed a source cited by Reuters, underscoring the gravity of the situation. Meanwhile, Russian military bloggers have celebrated their advances, suggesting that these movements are reshaping international narratives. The capture of nearby Velyka Novosilka, while symbolically significant, further illustrates the extent of Russia’s territorial gains since mid-2024. In the broader geopolitical context, former President Donald Trump has expressed a desire to broker a peace deal to conclude the war in Ukraine. However, analysts believe that Putin is pushing for territorial gains to strengthen Russia's negotiating position. He has reportedly ordered his generals to intensify attacks on Ukrainian positions using "swarm infantry tactics." Despite the war-weariness among Ukrainians and growing public support for a peace deal, advisers to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have cautioned against early negotiations with Putin, labeling it a potential “catastrophic mistake.” The unfolding scenario presents a complex challenge, as international leaders grapple with strategies to address the escalating conflict while maintaining regional stability. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-23

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has urged Americans to avoid equating the pardons issued by President Donald Trump with those of former President Joe Biden, emphasizing their significant differences. During an appearance on CNN’s *The Source* on Tuesday evening, Sanders discussed the wave of executive actions taken by Trump, including pardons for individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, and how some have drawn comparisons to the pardons issued by Biden before he left office. Host Kaitlan Collins questioned Sanders on the matter, particularly highlighting Biden’s controversial decision to pardon family members. “What I think is that he was worried that, given all of Trump’s rhetoric, that [Biden] was going to go after his family and close associates,” Sanders explained. “All right, that’s a concern, but don’t equate the two.” Sanders acknowledged that there is room for debate about whether Biden’s decision to preemptively pardon his family was right or wrong. However, he insisted that the move bore no resemblance to Trump’s actions. “It has nothing to do with what Trump did today,” Sanders stated firmly. Biden’s last-minute pardons of family members marked an unprecedented use of executive power, motivated by concerns over Trump’s threats of retribution during a potential second administration. The decision caused division among Democrats, with some supporting the pardons and others expressing disapproval. After assuming office, Trump acted quickly to pardon almost all the rioters who stormed the Capitol four years ago, a move that also faced intense scrutiny. Sanders criticized Trump’s decision, particularly given his public support for law enforcement. “To tell the entire world that we’re going to pardon people who attacked and hurt police officers is telling,” Sanders remarked. “I think that is a horrible message, and I strongly disagree with his pardoning of those insurrectionists.” He pointed out that he knows of no one in Biden’s family who attempted to overthrow the U.S. government. Sanders further condemned Trump’s actions, saying, “What Trump is saying to the world is that it is okay for you to attack police officers when you have a mind to do that. And I think that is an outrageous message to send to the world.” Sanders’ remarks underscore his deep concern about the implications of Trump’s pardons, contrasting them sharply with Biden’s controversial yet fundamentally different actions. Based on a report by The Hill 2025-01-23

Another way off topic trolling post removed, this is not about other posters, it is about: David Lammy Shifts Stance on Trump, Calling Him ‘Funny, Friendly, and Warm’

A 7 month old off topic link about the West Bank has been removed @bannork

UPDATE Hamas says 4 female hostages to be released on Saturday Hamas official Taher al-Nunu tells AFP that four Israeli women hostages will be freed in return for Palestinian prisoners on Saturday, in the second such release under a ceasefire deal. Nunu says Hamas would release “four Israeli female detainees in exchange” for a second group of Palestinian prisoners. He does not name them. There are seven female hostages remaining from the original list of 33 to be released in the first phase of the hostage ceasefire deal: Arbel Yehud, 29; Shiri Silberman Bibas, 33; Liri Albag, 19; Karina Ariev, 20; Agam Berger, 21; Danielle Gilboa, 20 and Naama Levy, 20. AFP & TOI

Britain faces a mental health crisis, but not in the way most people imagine. While genuine mental health conditions remain a pressing issue, a growing problem lies in the increasing number of individuals self-diagnosing with conditions such as depression, anxiety, OCD, PTSD, or neurodevelopmental disorders like autism and ADHD. This trend is diverting precious resources away from those truly in need. “The golden age of openness about mental health has turned into something else entirely,” notes Dame Clare Gerada, former president of the Royal College of General Practitioners. She warns that Britain has developed a tendency to label normal life challenges as mental health conditions. "People would rather have a label than consider why their life might be challenging or where it could have gone wrong," she adds. This shift has created a situation where mental illness is no longer stigmatized but, alarmingly, is often worn as a badge of honour. As Dr. Max, a consultant psychiatrist, explains, "It’s starting to feel like mental illness has become something people cling to as a way of explaining the normal difficulties life throws at us.” Former Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair recently weighed in on the issue, expressing concerns about the rush to medicalize life’s natural ups and downs. His words, echoed by mental health professionals, highlight the danger of self-diagnosis and the pressure on doctors to validate these unfounded concerns. The impact of this phenomenon on the healthcare system is profound. As Dr. Max shares, psychiatrists increasingly spend their time explaining to patients that they do not have mental illnesses. "I thought no one wanted to be mentally ill," one psychiatrist remarked at a recent meeting. "It turns out everyone does." This problem is compounded by a growing resistance from patients when told they are mentally well. “When I tell someone they don’t have depression, they often look at me confused and reply, ‘But I’m not happy,’” says Dr. Max. The expectation of constant happiness, as if life were meant to be a perpetual state of euphoria, has skewed perceptions of what constitutes mental illness. In some cases, doctors succumb to patient demands, providing a diagnosis to placate them. This can lead to unintended consequences, such as individuals being signed off work for dubious reasons, only to develop genuine mental health issues through prolonged inactivity, isolation, and substance use. “Some people end up at home, watching TV, playing video games, and smoking cannabis. And guess what? They eventually do develop real mental health problems,” Dr. Max laments. The rise of misdiagnosis and misplaced self-diagnosis risks trivializing the struggles of those with legitimate mental illnesses. It also perpetuates the misconception that life should always be positive and devoid of hardship. As Dr. Max emphasizes, “Life is rife with frustration, disappointment, and uncertainties. These are not illnesses; they are part of the human experience.” While the destigmatization of mental health discussions is a positive step, it’s crucial to strike a balance. The narrative must shift to emphasize resilience and coping mechanisms rather than labeling normal emotional experiences as disorders. "Yes, let’s keep talking," Dr. Max concludes, "but let’s expand the conversation to reflect the realities of life and the tools we need to navigate it. We owe it to those truly in need of mental health care to ensure they are not overlooked in a system overwhelmed by the ‘worried well.’” The solution lies not in silencing the conversation but in refining it—focusing on building emotional resilience and differentiating between mental illness and the challenges inherent to life. Only then can we ensure that help reaches those who need it most. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2025-01-22

A transgender nurse has been accused of intimidating female colleagues who launched a sexual harassment case against their employer after being required to share a changing room with her. The allegations were brought to light during a preliminary hearing at Newcastle Employment Tribunal. The nurse, known as Rose, was assigned male at birth but now lives as a woman. Despite this, it was noted during the hearing that Rose does not possess a gender recognition certificate, which legally defines her as male under current UK law. Female nurses working for the County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust have claimed they felt "intimidated" and "stared at" by Rose following the commencement of their legal action. Bruno Quintavalle, representing the nurses, argued that Rose had engaged in deliberate and confrontational behavior at the hospital since the legal proceedings began. He stated: “It is the claimants’ position … that far from being reduced to a state of fear and concern about his psychological or physical integrity, Rose has responded to the initiation of proceedings by trying to intimidate the nurses. By engaging in confrontational behavior in the hospital in situations where he would not usually be expected to be. This suggests that far from being in a state of shock, Rose is fully on top of things.” Bethany Hutchison, president of the Darlington Nurses Union, supported these claims in a witness statement, saying that Rose’s actions had made the nurses feel increasingly uncomfortable. Hutchison noted that Rose, who works as a theatre nurse, had begun frequenting the day surgery ward, where the complainants worked, much more often than before. “Rose’s frequent visits show there is no hostility or intimidation against Rose,” Hutchison stated. “Rather, it is Rose who is apparently seeking to intimidate us with those unnecessary visits.” Another nurse, Karen Danson, provided a statement detailing her own experiences upon returning to work after a period of medical leave. “Since I returned to work, I have only seen Rose a couple times in the canteen,” Danson said. “On those occasions, Rose is always staring and trying to intimidate us all.” Simon Cheetham KC, representing the NHS trust, sought an order to prevent Rose’s surname from being reported, citing privacy rights under the European Convention on Human Rights and potential risks of harm. Cheetham did not challenge the nurses’ allegations of intimidation during the hearing. However, Mr. Quintavalle opposed the application, arguing that granting anonymity would hinder the claimants’ ability to share their experiences. Sharon Langridge, the employment judge presiding over the preliminary hearing, has reserved her decision on the application for anonymity. She confirmed that her written ruling would be issued within the next couple of weeks. The tribunal is set to begin on June 16 and conclude on July 4, during which the claims of sexual discrimination and harassment against the NHS trust will be fully examined. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-22

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has suggested that Donald Trump's presidency could catalyze a sweeping right-wing political transformation across Europe. Speaking at a conference on Monday, Orban expressed his optimism about the influence of a new U.S. administration on European politics and declared his intention to spearhead what he described as an offensive to "occupy Brussels." "The Sun will shine differently in Brussels," Orban proclaimed, emphasizing the potential for significant political change. He referenced the arrival of a "new President in the US" and the presence of a "large faction of Patriots in Brussels" as key factors that would energize the movement. "So the great attack can start. Hereby I launch the second phase of the offensive that aims to occupy Brussels," Orban stated. The Hungarian leader has been a vocal supporter of Donald Trump and a frequent critic of the European Union, often opposing its policies on issues such as migration and governance. Orban's rhetoric reflects his broader ambition to bolster nationalist and right-wing political forces within Europe, challenging the influence of EU institutions in Brussels. Orban’s remarks come amid growing divisions within the EU, where debates over sovereignty, immigration, and cultural identity have fueled the rise of nationalist movements in several member states. His comments suggest a renewed push to align with like-minded political actors and amplify their influence on the European stage. While Orban's statements are likely to resonate with his supporters, they may also intensify tensions between Hungary and EU leaders, who have often criticized his government for undermining democratic norms and the rule of law. The Hungarian Prime Minister's bold declaration underscores his vision of a politically redefined Europe, one shaped by the resurgence of right-wing ideals and resistance to what he views as the overreach of Brussels. Based on a report by Reuters 2025-01-22

In a recent interview on CBS' "Face the Nation," President-elect Donald Trump's incoming national security adviser, Mike Waltz, made a definitive statement regarding the situation in Gaza. He emphasized the unwavering stance of the Trump administration towards Hamas and their governance in the region. "Hamas will never govern Gaza. That is completely unacceptable," Waltz declared, signaling a strong U.S. support for Israel's actions should Hamas violate the ceasefire-for-hostages agreement. Waltz underscored that the Trump administration has conveyed this position clearly to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "I want the Israeli people to hear me loud and clear," he asserted. "If Hamas reneges on this deal and Hamas backs out, moves the goalpost, what have you, we will support Israel in doing what it has to do." His remarks reflect a firm commitment to Israel's security and a zero-tolerance policy for any deviation by Hamas from the agreed terms. Moreover, Waltz expressed optimism about the Trump administration's potential to further the Abraham Accords, particularly by facilitating a normalization agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia. This goal aligns with the broader Middle East peace strategy that the administration seeks to advance. Based on a report by Reuters 2025-01-22

In a surprising turn, Foreign Secretary David Lammy has offered high praise for President-elect Donald Trump, a stark contrast to his previous harsh criticisms. Lammy, who once referred to Trump as a “woman-hating, neo-Nazi sympathising sociopath” in 2018, now describes him as “incredibly graceful,” “generous,” and “very, very friendly.” Lammy’s shift in tone comes as the UK government seeks to strengthen ties with the incoming US administration. Sir Keir Starmer is expected to visit Washington, D.C., to meet with Trump in the coming weeks, with efforts to secure a new trade deal high on the agenda. A “mini-Cabinet” of senior ministers has been established to strategize ways to persuade Trump to reach an agreement favorable to the UK. When questioned on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme about his altered perspective on Trump, Lammy emphasized a pragmatic approach. “The approach has got to be progressive realism,” he said. “You meet the world as it is, not as you would wish it to be.” Lammy acknowledged the broad support Trump enjoys globally, noting a recent survey indicating that 70 percent of the world welcomes Trump’s return to power. He pointed out the increase in support for Trump among various demographics in the US, including African American and Latino communities, and younger voters. “We have to reckon with that truth,” Lammy concluded, signaling a recognition of Trump’s enduring appeal. The UK government is hopeful that past criticisms from senior Labour figures won’t hinder the ongoing efforts to foster a strong UK-US relationship under Trump’s leadership. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-22

The trial of Ricky Jones, a suspended Labour councillor facing accusations of inciting violence during last summer’s riots, has been postponed until August. Jones, 57, is charged with encouraging violent disorder following a speech delivered to a crowd in Walthamstow on August 7 last year. His words, captured on video, gained widespread attention online as he spoke out against "disgusting Nazi fascists," declaring, "we need to cut their throats and get rid of them." Originally, Jones was scheduled to stand trial this week at Snaresbrook Crown Court. However, a decision made last week has now deferred the trial until August 11. This delay follows Jones’ suspension from the Labour Party after his participation in the anti-fascist protest on Hoe Street, Walthamstow, where the controversial speech was made. In court last September, Jones pleaded not guilty to the charge of encouraging violent disorder. Initially remanded in custody, he has since been released on bail. Chief Crown Prosecutor Jaswant Narwal of CPS London North stated at the time the charges were announced, "Jones was filmed addressing a crowd in Walthamstow on Wednesday 7 August during which he appeared to make remarks and a gesture to encourage others to act violently towards far-right protestors." Narwal emphasized the importance of preserving the integrity of the judicial process, reminding the public, "We remind all concerned that criminal proceedings are active and that he has the right to a fair trial. It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary, or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings." As the new trial date approaches, the case remains a focal point for public and media attention, highlighting the tensions surrounding the events of last summer and the ongoing repercussions for those involved. Based on a report by the Standard 2025-01-22

A daycare center has been firebombed and scrawled with graffiti reading “f— the Jews” in the latest antisemitic attack in Sydney, Australia. Acting New South Wales Police Commissioner Peter Thurtell announced that Strike Force Pearl, a unit established to investigate antisemitic crimes in Sydney, will receive additional resources immediately. “We already have significant resources, but incidents like this highlight the need for us to continue bolstering our efforts to identify, arrest, and bring these offenders to justice,” Thurtell stated. He further condemned the perpetrators, asserting, "These are criminals who aim to disrupt our society, and we will ensure they face the consequences." New South Wales Premier Chris Minns echoed these sentiments, emphasizing that both state and federal resources are being deployed to combat the rise in antisemitic crime. “The surge in antisemitic attacks is deeply troubling and remains a primary concern for our state,” Minns said. Despite acknowledging the challenges, Minns reassured the public that progress is being made, noting that nine suspects have been arrested and charged in connection with three recent attacks in Sydney, all of whom remain in custody. To enhance community safety, New South Wales Police also launched Operation Shelter following the increase in tensions triggered by pro-Palestinian protests in Sydney. According to Thurtell, over 180 individuals have been arrested under Operation Shelter, with 40 charged specifically with antisemitic offenses. Australia, home to approximately 117,000 Jewish residents—about 0.46% of its population—has the highest number of Holocaust survivors per capita after Israel. This historical context underscores the urgency and significance of addressing the current wave of antisemitic crimes to protect its Jewish community. Based on a report by WP 2025-01-22

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) has sharply criticized President Donald Trump for issuing broad pardons to nearly all individuals charged in connection with the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. In an interview on MSNBC’s "Inside with Jen Psaki," Schiff described the move as "obscene" and "a grotesque display" of presidential power. “It’s obscene. It’s a grotesque display of his new power as President to pardon these 15- or 1600 people, which I have to imagine includes people that committed violent assaults on law enforcement,” Schiff said. “It really is a terrible way to begin, but not a surprising way to begin the new administration.” On Monday night, Trump announced that he had granted approximately 1,500 “full, complete, and unconditional pardons” to individuals charged for their roles in the Capitol riot. A total of 1,583 people have faced charges related to the attack. Trump justified the sweeping pardons while signing orders in the Oval Office, stating, “What they’ve done to these people is outrageous.” Among those granted clemency were members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, who had been charged with conspiring to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election. The sentences of many were commuted to time served. Notably, Enrique Tarrio, the former national chairman of the Proud Boys, who was serving a 22-year prison term — the longest sentence handed down in connection with the attack — received a full pardon. Schiff criticized the decision to pardon Tarrio, calling it emblematic of Trump’s leadership style and his ties to far-right groups. “It is rather fitting, sadly, that among his very first acts in office is to give a pardon to a white nationalist leader like that,” Schiff remarked. “To pardon him, I think, is very symbolic of where the President is coming from. It, to me, harkens back to his statement, vis a vis the Proud Boys, years earlier, where he said, stand back and stand by, or something along those lines.” Reflecting on Trump’s latest move, Schiff concluded, “Well, apparently, he had their back after all.” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), another member of the former House select committee investigating the January 6 attack, also weighed in, telling CNN that the Trump administration “has a lot of explaining to do” regarding the clemency extended to the Capitol riot defendants. These actions came just hours after outgoing President Joe Biden issued preemptive pardons for members and staff of the House January 6 select committee, including Schiff and Raskin, in the final moments of his presidency. Based on a report by The Hill 2025-01-22

An inquiry by members of the House of Lords has urged "urgent" reforms to the UK’s disability benefits system, calling on the government to move forward with planned changes. The House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee, in a letter to Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) Secretary Liz Kendall, highlighted the pressing need to address rising welfare spending, which it said remains a significant challenge for the government. The report notes that £65 billion is spent annually on health-related benefits, surpassing the government’s defence budget of £54 billion. Committee chair Lord Bridges of Headley emphasized that the current system incentivizes claims for health-related benefits while offering limited encouragement for individuals to transition into employment. He urged immediate action, saying there should be “no delay” in reforms, particularly regarding how claimants are assessed. The intervention comes on the heels of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s comments during a recent visit to Ukraine, where he warned that he would be “ruthless” in cutting benefits if necessary to balance the budget. A green paper outlining planned reforms to health-related benefits is expected this spring, with the government signaling that changes to the controversial Work Capability Assessment (WCA) will be central. Since its introduction in 2008, the WCA has faced widespread criticism for inaccuracies and mistrust. Reports in both 2018 and 2023 found a significant number of incorrect assessment decisions, fueling public dissatisfaction. Lord Bridges criticized the current system as “financially unsustainable” and a waste of human potential, calling on the government to prioritize reforms. He added, “There should be more support to help those who are able to find and accept work—and to ensure that those who cannot work for a period are not abandoned to a life on benefits.” The number of people claiming health-related benefits has surged since the COVID-19 pandemic, with 3.7 million working-age individuals now receiving such support—1.2 million more than in February 2020. The committee pointed to increased mental health issues among young people and growing NHS waiting lists as key factors driving this rise. However, it stated there is “no convincing evidence” that government plans to improve NHS waiting times will significantly reduce these figures. The report also estimates that enabling 400,000 individuals currently out of work due to ill health to re-enter the workforce could save the government £10 billion annually. James Taylor, executive director of strategy at the disability equality charity Scope, called for immediate reforms but warned against focusing solely on cost-cutting. “Our broken benefits system urgently needs fixing, and we know there are a million disabled people who want to work but are denied the opportunity,” Taylor said. He added, “Cutting benefits spend means taking away the support disabled people need to live, which will push many more disabled people into poverty.” Labour has pledged to save £1.3 billion annually through reforms to the WCA, promising to match previous government spending commitments while re-consulting on changes. This follows a High Court ruling that deemed the Conservative government’s consultation on planned reforms “unfair” and “misleading.” A government spokesperson reaffirmed their commitment to boosting employment rates, stating, “We are determined to get Britain working again and have set out our first steps towards delivering an 80% employment rate by joining up local work, health, and skills plans.” Based on a report by The Independent 2025-01-22