Social Media

Reform UK has achieved a significant milestone by surpassing the Conservatives in an opinion poll for the first time, marking a pivotal moment in British politics. According to a YouGov survey, Nigel Farage’s party is now at 19 percent, edging past the Conservatives, who are at 18 percent. Labour remains the frontrunner with 37 percent, maintaining an 18-point lead, while the Liberal Democrats trail in fourth place at 14 percent. This unprecedented shift in the political landscape has prompted Farage to declare, “We are now the opposition.” The survey results came in the wake of the Tory manifesto launch, highlighting the growing concern among Conservative MPs and strategists about a potential "crossover moment" in the polls—a fear that has now materialized with Farage’s return to frontline politics and his takeover from Richard Tice as Reform leader. In a statement, Farage expressed his confidence, saying, “We have now overtaken the Conservatives, we’re in second position in the country. In fact, we’re leading the Conservative Party in every single region apart from Scotland. This is the inflection point. The only wasted vote now is a Conservative vote. We are the challengers to Labour and we’re on our way.” During a seven-way election debate on ITV, Farage emphasized the significance of the poll results: “Just before we came on air, we overtook the Conservatives in a national opinion poll. We are now the opposition to Labour.” His comments came in response to accusations from Penny Mordaunt, the Tory House of Commons leader, who labeled Farage a “Labour enabler.” Farage rebutted, “As for being the Labour enabler, we are now ahead of you in the national polls. A vote for you is actually now a vote for Labour.” Mr. Tice, Reform’s chairman, expressed his satisfaction with the poll results, stating, “We’re absolutely delighted and YouGov is the gold standard of pollsters. We think they’ve been closest to our real support. And the direction of travel is that we’re heading north and the Tories are heading south. The people’s revolt is just gathering momentum.” Reform UK's campaign strategy is set to intensify as Farage prepares to launch the party’s manifesto in the Welsh valleys, targeting Labour strongholds. Farage believes that Reform can capture seats from Labour in Wales, a region that voted strongly to leave the EU in the 2016 referendum. He argues that working-class communities in Wales have been neglected by Westminster since devolution and poorly served by the Labour-controlled Welsh Assembly. The Reform manifesto will not only critique the Conservative government but also highlight what it describes as “the disaster of the devolved Labour government in a left behind part of the country.” The party aims to resonate with voters disillusioned with both major parties, capitalizing on the frustration felt in regions like South Wales, where many former mining communities voted Leave in 2016. The Conservative campaign, meanwhile, has faced multiple setbacks. Recently, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak had to apologize for leaving D-Day commemorations in Normandy early. Additionally, Sunak was embroiled in controversy after one of his aides placed a £100 bet on a July election just days before the Prime Minister announced it would take place on July 4, leading to an investigation by the Gambling Commission. Lee Anderson, a former deputy chairman of the Conservative Party who defected to Reform in February, remarked on the poll results: “It’s happened, the crossover has actually happened. We are now polling ahead of the Conservative Party. Vote Conservative, get Labour.” A Tory MP from a marginal Red Wall constituency commented, “This is what happens when you fail to deliver on immigration.” Reform’s surge in support since Farage’s return has caught Tory strategists off guard. A YouGov survey conducted just before Farage announced his comeback had Reform at 10 percent and the Tories comfortably in second place at 25 percent. Farage’s return to leadership has nearly doubled Reform's polling figures, disrupting the Conservatives’ election strategy. Andrew Wells, head of European political and social research at YouGov, noted the significance of the poll: “Obviously all polls have a margin of error, so we can’t conclude for certain that more voters now back Nigel Farage’s party over the Conservatives. But what it does make clear is that at the very least the Conservatives and Reform are at a very similar level of support to each other. That in itself is remarkable given how close we are to an election when we might otherwise have expected smaller parties’ votes to be squeezed.” Despite the poll’s implications, some Conservative figures remain skeptical. David Davis, the former Conservative Brexit secretary, urged voters to be cautious about poll results: “On the doorstep in my constituency, I don’t see it. I’m sure the polls are right today. But the other thing I know from my 10 different campaigns is the polls are always off. There’s only one opinion poll that’s not off and it’s the one they take as people come out of the polling station. All the others are off by between 6 and 20 percent.” The Conservative Party’s warnings about a potential Labour super-majority have been highlighted in their social media campaigns, suggesting that the party could be reduced to a rump of just 57 seats, with the Liberal Democrats potentially overtaking them as the largest opposition party. As the political landscape shifts, the upcoming election promises to be a defining moment for all parties involved. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-15 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that he would order an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine if Kyiv agreed to withdraw troops from the four regions occupied and annexed by Russia in 2022 and renounce its NATO membership aspirations. This statement was made during a speech at the Russian Foreign Ministry in Moscow on Friday. Putin described this proposal as a "final resolution" to the conflict, emphasizing that it would bring about unity between Russia and Ukraine, as well as with Europe more broadly. He asserted the Kremlin's readiness to start negotiations without delay. “We will do it immediately,” Putin stated, suggesting that such an agreement would prevent the conflict from being frozen and instead provide a lasting solution. There was no immediate response from Kyiv. Ukraine remains firm on its NATO membership ambitions and insists on the withdrawal of Russian troops from all occupied territories. Putin's remarks coincided with a meeting of G7 leaders in Italy, where a €46 billion loan package for Ukraine was agreed upon. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy also signed a 10-year security agreement with US President Joe Biden. Switzerland is set to host a conference aimed at outlining steps towards peace in Ukraine, drawing from Zelenskyy's 10-point peace formula introduced in late 2022. This conference seeks to rally international support and present a unified front against Russian aggression. Background on the Conflict Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022. After failing to capture Kyiv, the conflict has predominantly focused on the southern and eastern border regions of Ukraine. Despite Russia's annexation claims, it does not fully control any of the four regions (Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson). Putin's demands include the complete withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from these regions and their cession to Russia. In Zaporizhzhia, Russian forces do not control the regional capital, and in Kherson, they withdrew from the city of Kherson in November 2022. Reactions and Implications The proposal by Putin comes at a critical juncture, as Ukraine continues to garner significant international support, both militarily and economically. The G7's financial support and the security pact with the US highlight the global community's commitment to Ukraine's sovereignty and defense. While Putin’s offer might appear as a pathway to peace, it essentially demands significant territorial concessions and a major shift in Ukraine’s foreign policy, which Kyiv is unlikely to accept without considerable pressure or significant concessions from Russia. The ongoing international efforts to support Ukraine and the planned peace conference in Switzerland underscore a continued push for a resolution that does not compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity or sovereignty. Credit: EURO News 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a significant legal development, Russia is facing accusations of utilizing deliberate starvation tactics during the 85-day siege of Mariupol in early 2022. This brutal strategy, aimed at causing widespread civilian harm, is being examined as a potential war crime by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. The siege of Mariupol, a key port city in southeastern Ukraine, marked one of the most harrowing episodes at the outset of Russia's invasion. Approximately 22,000 civilians are believed to have perished during this period, as they were left without essential services such as water, gas, and electricity. The temperatures during the siege plummeted to below minus 10°C, exacerbating the suffering of the city's residents. The ICC submission, prepared by Global Rights Compliance in collaboration with the Ukrainian government, argues that Russia, under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin, engaged in a calculated strategy to inflict mass civilian casualties by denying access to food and other vital services. Catriona Murdoch, a partner at Global Rights Compliance, highlighted the systematic nature of this strategy, describing it as a four-phase assault. In the first phase, Russian forces targeted and disabled the city's electricity, heating, and water supplies, effectively crippling its infrastructure. The second phase involved blocking humanitarian aid, with Russian forces denying and even attacking evacuation efforts, ensuring that aid could not reach the besieged population. The third phase saw continued assaults on remaining critical infrastructure, with deliberate bombings of aid and water distribution points to terrorize civilians further. The final phase involved strategic attacks aimed at destroying or capturing any remaining infrastructure, completing the encirclement and subjugation of the city. The extensive destruction in Mariupol, where an estimated 90% of healthcare facilities and homes were either destroyed or damaged, underscores the severity of the situation. Food distribution points and humanitarian evacuation routes were bombed, exacerbating the already dire humanitarian crisis. The dossier concludes that responsibility for these actions lies at the highest levels of Russian leadership, implicating President Putin and senior military officials, although specific commanders were not named. Starvation and the denial of essential services are recognized as war crimes, but this area of international law remains relatively new and untested in court. To date, no alleged perpetrator has been prosecuted for such crimes. However, recent actions by ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan indicate a growing legal focus on this issue. Khan recently applied for arrest warrants against Israeli officials for alleged starvation tactics in Gaza, marking the first time the ICC has pursued such charges. This precedent may influence the ICC's approach to the Mariupol case. Murdoch emphasized that these recent applications have brought greater attention to starvation as a prosecutable war crime and may shape the ICC's consideration of the Mariupol dossier. Collecting evidence for this case presented significant challenges due to the ongoing Russian occupation and extensive destruction in the city. However, the lawyers employed innovative methods, including a specially designed algorithm to map destruction using satellite imagery. This technology helped correlate specific locations and their destruction with what explosives experts identified as Russian attacks. The submission of this dossier to the ICC represents a significant step in holding those responsible for the siege of Mariupol accountable. If the court acts on this submission, it could mark a pivotal moment in the prosecution of war crimes related to starvation and the deliberate denial of essential services. Murdoch stated, "What we could see is that there were four phases to the Russian assault, starting with attacks on civilian infrastructure, cutting out the supply of electricity, heating, and water. Then humanitarian evacuations were denied and even attacked, while aid was prevented from getting through. In the third phase, the remaining critical infrastructure was targeted, civilians terrorized with aid and water points bombed. Finally, in phase four, Russia engaged in strategic attacks to destroy or capture any remaining infrastructure items." The dossier concludes that the phased targeting of Mariupol demonstrated a lack of mercy for its civilian population, which was estimated at 450,000 before the full invasion began on February 24, 2022. Murdoch asserted that "Vladimir Putin is culpable," along with the "echelons of the Russian military leadership." The ICC accepts third-party submissions, though it does not necessarily act on them. Starvation and the denial of amenities necessary for civilian life are considered war crimes, but prosecutions in this area are unprecedented. Last month, ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan applied for an arrest warrant for Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, arguing that they had deliberately inflicted starvation on Palestinians in Gaza—a claim rejected by Israel. Khan asserted, "Israel has intentionally and systematically deprived the civilian population in all parts of Gaza of objects indispensable to human survival." Three Hamas leaders were also subject to similar applications, relating to the conflict that began with the group's attack on Israel on October 7. Murdoch explained that Khan’s applications for arrest warrants related to starvation as a war crime were the first of their kind and had brought the issue to the forefront of legal minds. "What it showed is where the ICC’s thinking is," she said. Initially, gathering evidence for a war crimes dossier on Mariupol seemed daunting due to the Russian occupation and intense fighting. However, Global Rights Compliance developed a technique that used a specially created algorithm to map the destruction of specific locations, as monitored by satellite imagery, with what explosives experts assessed as Russian attacks. As the ICC reviews this submission, the international community awaits its response. The outcome could set a significant precedent for future prosecutions of war crimes related to starvation and the deliberate denial of essential services. Credit: The Guardian 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The Scottish National Party (SNP), long dominant in Scotland's political landscape, is facing a significant shift in public sentiment. Recent events and public outcry suggest that the electorate is growing weary of the SNP's excuses and mismanagement, especially in critical areas like education and healthcare. During a recent BBC debate among Scotland’s political leaders, the frustration of Scottish voters was palpable. John Swinney, the SNP leader and First Minister of Scotland, faced harsh criticism from citizens who accused him of deflecting responsibility and blaming external factors for the SNP's failures. A Glasgow mother voiced her frustration directly, saying she was "sick" of Swinney blaming everyone else for issues that fall under the SNP's jurisdiction, such as education and health. Her comments resonated with many viewers, highlighting a growing discontent with the SNP's governance. Adding to the criticism, a young man from the audience expressed his anger at the state of the economy, noting the boarded-up businesses and increasing number of beggars in the streets. He condemned the SNP's focus on independence while failing to address pressing local issues. Swinney’s attempts to defend his party's record by blaming deficiencies on the British government or other parties fell flat in the face of these pointed critiques. The debate illustrated a broader shift in public opinion. As Swinney struggled to deflect blame, the public's dissatisfaction became increasingly clear. Opinion polls suggest that the SNP could face a significant defeat in the upcoming July 4 election. This potential downturn mirrors the political embarrassment experienced by Gordon Brown in 2010 when he was caught on camera dismissing a concerned voter as "bigoted." In the debate, Swinney was confronted with the harsh reality of public opinion. The Glaswegian mother demanded accountability for the SNP’s failures, particularly in education and healthcare, which are fully devolved to the Scottish government. Her demand for a direct answer underscored the frustration felt by many Scottish parents: "We’re sick of hearing it’s Westminster’s fault that education is in crisis. We want to know what you and your party are going to do to fix what’s happening in education right now." When Swinney attempted to sidestep her criticism, she forcefully interjected, "Stop passing the buck." Swinney's assertion that Scottish independence would enable him to address these issues was met with skepticism. Despite his description of independence as a "beautiful proposition," the public and his critics saw this as another evasion. One audience member quipped, "Tidy the flat before you move out, John," suggesting that the SNP should address current issues before pursuing independence. Political opponents, including Douglas Ross of the Scottish Tories and Anas Sarwar of Scottish Labour, seized the opportunity to highlight Swinney’s deflection tactics. They argued that with full control over education and the NHS, the SNP had no excuse for their failures. The debate also featured a contentious appearance by Lorna Slater of the Greens, who, instead of presenting clear alternatives, delivered what was perceived as a confused and noisy rant. Her performance did little to bolster her party's standing and may have alienated potential voters. As the July 4 election approaches, traditional SNP voters may be reconsidering their support. The debate underscored a significant shift in public sentiment, with increasing numbers of Scots demanding accountability and effective governance. The SNP’s focus on independence, while neglecting critical domestic issues, appears to be losing its appeal among a populace tired of excuses and eager for tangible improvements in their daily lives. The outcome of the election could mark a turning point in Scottish politics, signaling a decline in the SNP’s dominance and a demand for more accountable and effective leadership. As voters prepare to cast their ballots, the message is clear: it’s time for the SNP to address the real issues facing Scotland and take responsibility for their governance. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of SpaceX, is facing serious allegations of pursuing sexual relationships with female employees at his company, including a former intern and other staff members. These claims have been documented in affidavits by former executives and reported by The Wall Street Journal. One of the most notable accusations involves Musk having a sexual relationship with a former intern who was more than 20 years younger than him. Additionally, in 2014, Musk reportedly had a month-long affair with another female employee who reported directly to him. This relationship ended poorly, and the woman faced negative consequences, ultimately leaving the company and signing a non-disclosure agreement about her time at SpaceX. In another incident from 2013, Musk allegedly asked a female employee to bear his children. When she refused, she was subsequently denied a raise. These allegations paint a troubling picture of the work environment at SpaceX, suggesting a culture where company policies regarding sexual misconduct and harassment were not enforced, particularly when it involved Musk. Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX’s president, responded to these allegations by asserting that the company thoroughly investigates all complaints of harassment and takes appropriate actions. However, former executives maintain that Musk’s behavior was a significant factor in creating a sexist and hostile work environment. Adding to Musk’s legal troubles, SpaceX and he are being sued by eight engineers who claim they were wrongfully terminated for raising concerns about sexual harassment and discrimination against women at the company. This lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles, alleges that these engineers, consisting of four women and four men, were fired after circulating a letter criticizing Musk's behavior and urging the company to take a stand against his sexually charged comments on social media. The lawsuit highlights several instances of Musk making inappropriate comments, including a 2022 tweet where he joked, “if you touch my wiener, you can have a horse,” directed at the former CEO of YouTube. The plaintiffs argue that Musk’s conduct fostered a "pervasively sexist culture" at SpaceX, where female engineers faced routine harassment and sexist remarks, and their concerns were routinely ignored. The engineers also detailed how senior staff used euphemisms for sexual acts and male genitals when discussing rocket components, further contributing to the hostile work environment. These actions, according to the lawsuit, caused significant distress and disrupted the plaintiffs' emotional well-being at work. SpaceX has yet to respond to requests for comment on this particular lawsuit but has previously denied any wrongdoing, asserting that the engineers were fired for violating company policies and that the 2022 letter was disruptive. The company has also denied that Musk played a role in the decision to terminate these employees. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages and an injunction to prevent SpaceX from continuing its allegedly unlawful practices. Previous legal filings and civil rights complaints in California have also raised similar allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation at the company, suggesting a pattern of misconduct and inadequate responses to such issues. These allegations against Elon Musk and SpaceX bring to light serious concerns about the work culture at one of the world's leading aerospace companies. As these legal battles unfold, they will likely have significant implications for Musk, SpaceX, and the broader conversation about workplace harassment and accountability in the tech industry. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Grayzone attacks linked to Russia and its allies are rising across Europe, with recent incidents claiming lives and causing widespread disruption. One of the most alarming examples is the death of a Polish soldier, Mariusz Sitek, who was killed at the border with Belarus, not by traditional military means but through a tactic that exemplifies grayzone warfare. Mariusz Sitek, a member of Poland's 1st Armored Brigade, was fatally stabbed by a migrant brought to the border by Belarusian authorities. This incident is part of a broader strategy by Belarus to destabilize the European Union (EU) and NATO by using migrants as tools of disruption. In 2021, Belarus began transporting thousands of migrants from the Middle East, Afghanistan, and other regions to its borders with Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania. This tactic aimed to create an artificial migration crisis, sowing chaos and straining relations within the EU. Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania responded by erecting border fences and taking a firm stance against the influx. Despite these measures, the situation remains volatile, as demonstrated by Sitek's death. The Polish border fence, a recent installation of steel tubes topped with barbed wire, was pierced by a migrant wielding a knife attached to a pole, fatally wounding the soldier. This tragic event underscores the severity of grayzone aggression and the challenges it poses to NATO and European security. Grayzone aggression involves non-traditional methods of warfare that aim to destabilize and harm without triggering a full-scale military response. These tactics include cyberattacks, misinformation campaigns, economic coercion, and the use of proxy forces. They are designed to exploit vulnerabilities and create confusion, making it difficult for the targeted nations to respond effectively. The death of Mariusz Sitek is a stark reminder of the deadly potential of grayzone tactics. Poland's Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski has demanded the identification and extradition of the perpetrator from Belarus, but so far, there has been no cooperation. This lack of accountability is a hallmark of grayzone aggression, which seeks to inflict damage while avoiding direct confrontation. Another significant incident of grayzone aggression occurred on June 4, when a cyberattack hit several hospitals in London. The attack, attributed to the Russian cyber gang Qilin, severely disrupted medical services, rendering hospitals unable to conduct operations, perform blood transfusions, and carry out other critical functions. The UK National Health Service (NHS), the largest in the Western world, is now experiencing a blood shortage and has issued an urgent appeal for donations from individuals with the O blood type. Ciaran Martin, former CEO of the UK National Cyber Security Centre, confirmed the cyber gang operates freely within Russia, highlighting the complicity of the Russian state. The attack on the NHS demonstrates how grayzone tactics can target vital infrastructure, causing significant harm without conventional military engagement. The implications of these grayzone tactics are profound. Countries like Poland, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, and the UK have all faced suspected Russian-linked arson attacks, further illustrating the breadth of grayzone strategies. These actions create a persistent state of insecurity and challenge the traditional paradigms of national defense and international response. NATO and European governments are now grappling with how to address this complex form of aggression. NATO's commitment to defending "every square inch" of its territory is tested by these unconventional threats. The dilemma is whether to escalate the response, potentially provoking a broader conflict, or to find alternative strategies that can effectively counter these insidious tactics. One of the key challenges in responding to grayzone aggression is the lack of a clear rulebook. Traditional military responses are often inappropriate and escalatory, while inaction allows the aggressors to continue their destabilizing activities. The ethical standards upheld by liberal democracies also limit the range of possible retaliatory actions, making it difficult to respond in kind. The recent cyberattack on London hospitals and the death of a Polish soldier are stark examples of the urgent need for effective strategies to combat grayzone aggression. The West must develop comprehensive approaches that combine diplomatic, economic, cyber, and intelligence measures to deter and respond to these threats. The complexity of grayzone aggression requires a coordinated and multifaceted response. It is essential for NATO and its member states to enhance their resilience against such tactics, improve intelligence sharing, and develop new doctrines that address the unique challenges posed by grayzone warfare. As grayzone aggression continues to escalate, it is clear that the West needs answers, and quickly. The death of Mariusz Sitek and the disruption caused by cyberattacks on critical infrastructure highlight the immediate and tangible threats posed by these tactics. It is imperative for NATO and European governments to adapt their strategies and ensure they are prepared to defend against this evolving form of aggression. Credit: CEPA 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

San Francisco has made a historic declaration, affirming its commitment to transgender and non-binary individuals by designating itself as a sanctuary city. The unanimous decision by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors marks the city as the largest in the United States to adopt such a measure, reflecting its longstanding legacy of supporting LGBTQ rights. This resolution arrives at a critical time when many conservative states are escalating efforts to restrict transgender rights and access to gender-affirming care. By establishing itself as a sanctuary, San Francisco aims to provide a safe haven for transgender individuals and those who provide gender-affirming healthcare services. San Francisco's new status as a sanctuary for transgender and non-binary people is in line with its rich history of advocating for LGBTQ rights. The city has long been a leader in this area, with the Castro district recognized as one of the first gay neighborhoods in the country, rising to prominence in the 1960s as a center of LGBTQ culture and activism. The city is also home to the nation’s first transgender cultural district, located in the Tenderloin neighborhood. This district honors the site of a significant 1966 riot against police violence towards transgender individuals, an event that occurred three years before the more widely known Stonewall riots in New York City. Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, who represents the Castro district, emphasized that the resolution was a direct response to the conservative attacks on transgender people seen across the United States. He stated, “A majority of these laws specifically target transgender people, including youth. As other cities and states turn up the hate, places like San Francisco need to turn up the love.” “With this resolution, we are reaffirming that our City has been and will continue to be a sanctuary and a beacon for our transgender and gender non-conforming siblings,” Mandelman added. Over the past few years, more than a dozen states have introduced legislation aimed at limiting access to gender-affirming care. Transgender rights have become a contentious political issue, with conservative lawmakers proposing numerous bills that restrict healthcare, education, and other rights for transgender individuals. According to the Trans Legislation Tracker, a research site monitoring state bills targeting transgender rights, over 600 such bills were considered in 2023, and nearly 600 have been introduced so far in 2024. These legislative efforts often include bans on gender-affirming care for minors, restrictions on bathroom use, and limitations on participation in sports. San Francisco’s declaration as a sanctuary city for transgender and non-binary individuals is not merely a symbolic gesture but also a practical measure aimed at ensuring the safety and well-being of one of the most vulnerable communities. This policy echoes the city's well-known “sanctuary city” policy for immigration, which bars local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration agents. Adopted in 1985, the sanctuary city policy for immigrants has been replicated by cities across the country and has faced significant opposition from conservative groups and politicians. By extending sanctuary protections to transgender and non-binary people, San Francisco reaffirms its commitment to inclusivity and human rights. This action sends a powerful message to other cities and states, encouraging them to stand against discrimination and provide safe spaces for all individuals, regardless of gender identity. As legislative attacks on transgender rights continue to rise, San Francisco’s resolution represents a critical stand for equality and justice. It highlights the importance of local government action in protecting vulnerable populations and sets a precedent for other municipalities to follow. In a time of increasing division and hostility, San Francisco’s declaration of sanctuary status for transgender and non-binary people is a beacon of hope and solidarity. Credit: The Hill 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In northeastern Syria, children of ISIS fighters are grappling with a harsh reality: growing up behind bars for crimes they did not commit. Many of these young individuals, like Stefan Uterloo, find themselves in detention simply because of their parents' actions. At just 14, Uterloo was blindfolded and questioned by American officials. Now, at 19, he remains in Panorama, a maximum-security prison funded by the US-led coalition against ISIS and operated by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a Kurdish-led militia. He shares his confinement with 25 other young men in a single cell. Uterloo is among an estimated 600 boys and young men detained in Panorama, part of a larger group of nearly 4,000 ISIS male detainees. These young people, many brought to Syria by their parents to live under ISIS rule, now face an uncertain future. "I don’t know about the big guys," Uterloo said. "But if you’re speaking about the kids, and if you want to know the truth, we don’t even know why we are always punished. It’s like five years in this prison ... We don’t even know what we’ve done. We’ve been in prison because of our parents." The United Nations and various human rights organizations have long sounded the alarm about the humanitarian and legal crises faced by the children of ISIS fighters. Despite this, there is little consensus on how to handle their situation. As the US raises concerns about ISIS attempting to reestablish itself and launch attacks on the West, there is a renewed push to repatriate fighters and their families to their home countries for justice. Amnesty International estimates that approximately 30,000 children are currently held in at least 27 detention facilities and two camps—Al-Hol and Al-Roj—in northeastern Syria. This represents the highest concentration of children arbitrarily detained and deprived of their freedom globally. In a rare instance, CNN was granted access to these detention facilities, including Panorama prison. Amnesty International recently accused the SDF of holding detainees in "inhumane conditions," citing reports of torture and inadequate food and medical care, leading to a severe tuberculosis outbreak. The SDF disputes these claims. Mazloum Abdi, the SDF's top commander, stated that the allegations "are not mirroring the reality." During CNN's visit, detainees in the supervised cells appeared to be in decent physical condition, housed in clean, air-conditioned spaces. However, tuberculosis remains rampant, causing five deaths per month, and coughing could be heard throughout the hallways. Officials acknowledged that detainees spend up to 23 hours per day in their cells and are held indefinitely without charge. Advocacy groups argue that this situation creates "a legal black hole," potentially worse than the US' Guantanamo Bay detention facility. The broader issue extends to Al-Hol, a sprawling detention camp housing over 40,000 people, including individuals with ISIS affiliations and displaced persons. In a high-security annex, around 6,700 women and children with links to ISIS fighters are detained, many from over 60 countries. More than half of Al-Hol's population are children, the majority under 12 years old. The camp poses significant security risks. Gen. Erik Kurilla, head of the US military's Central Command, described Al-Hol as "a ticking time bomb," warning that it is "a breeding ground for the next generation of ISIS." Efforts to repatriate detainees from Syria have been slow. The population of Al-Hol has decreased by 42% from its peak of over 73,000 in 2019, but the process remains sluggish. Many detainees hail from countries outside the US-led coalition, such as Russia and China, complicating repatriation efforts. At the current pace, it could take at least seven more years to halve the camp's population. To mitigate the radicalization risk, the SDF has implemented a policy of separating boys at age 14 from their mothers, placing them in rehabilitation centers. However, children as young as 11 have been found in these facilities, suggesting that the policy may be applied more broadly. Former UN Special Rapporteur Fionnuala Ní Aoláin condemned this practice, stating, "It runs us into the area of a war crime." Compared to Al-Hol, the Orkesh rehabilitation center offers better conditions, with rooms, meals, and psychological support. Shamil Chakar, a teenager from Germany, recounted his violent separation from his mother in Al-Hol and his subsequent detention in Orkesh. Despite missing their families, detainees in Orkesh benefit from improved living conditions and support services. Repatriation efforts offer a glimmer of hope for some detainees. In May, American Brandy Salman and her nine children were repatriated from Al-Roj camp. However, others, like Hoda Muthana, an American-born woman who joined ISIS, remain in limbo. Muthana, whose US citizenship was revoked, lives in fear for her son's future as he approaches the age for forced separation. Her legal team continues to push for her and her son's repatriation, but the US government maintains that she is not a citizen. Muthana expressed her desperation to return to the US, even if it means facing imprisonment. "If I had any time to serve, I would serve it and I would come out and begin my life with my son," she told CNN. "If I were to have the choice between American prison and this camp, I would choose an American prison any day." The plight of these children and young adults underscores the complex humanitarian and legal challenges in dealing with the remnants of ISIS. As the world grapples with how to address these issues, the children of ISIS fighters continue to bear the consequences of their parents' actions, trapped in a cycle of detention and uncertainty. Credit: CNN 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Harvard University researchers have proposed a startling theory: extraterrestrial beings may already be living among us, possibly residing in advanced technological civilizations deep underground or in a base on the moon. This provocative idea is detailed in a new paper from Harvard's Human Flourishing Program, which delves into the enigmatic phenomenon of "unidentified anomalous phenomena" (UAP), more commonly known as UFOs. The study paper, titled The Cryptoterrestrial Hypothesis: A Case for Scientific Openness to a Concealed Earthly Explanation for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena,"** advocates for a broader consideration of potential explanations for UAPs. The authors, Tim Lomas, Brendan Case, and Michael Paul Masters, argue that the scientific community should adopt a spirit of "epistemic humility and openness" when investigating these phenomena. Exploring New Frontiers Traditionally, explanations for UAPs have been divided into two main categories: conventional terrestrial explanations, such as human-made technology, and extraterrestrial explanations, involving advanced civilizations from other parts of the cosmos. However, the Harvard researchers propose a third, less conventional category: an unconventional terrestrial explanation. This hypothesis suggests that UAPs could be the result of advanced civilizations that have developed on Earth, separate from known human history. The paper outlines several "cryptoterrestrial" hypotheses (CTH) to explain these unidentified phenomena: 1. Temporal or Extraterrestrial Visitors:** Cryptoterrestrials might have arrived on Earth from another time period or planet and have concealed themselves using advanced stealth technologies. 2. Parallel Evolution:** An intelligent species could have evolved separately from humans on Earth, possibly as descendants of unknown intelligent dinosaurs or ape-like ancestors. 3. Ancient Remnant Civilizations:** A remnant form of an ancient civilization could still exist on Earth, having survived a catastrophic event like a flood or another natural disaster. 4. Supernatural Entities:** This theory entertains the possibility of "earthbound angels" or other supernatural beings, likened to fairies, elves, or nymphs, existing in a hidden capacity. The authors acknowledge the skepticism that their theories will likely encounter, particularly the suggestion of supernatural entities like elves or fairies. They admit that such ideas may seem far-fetched, especially to those accustomed to the standard model of physics. "While belief in extraterrestrials is tenable, belief in (something like) fairies is simply not a live option for many scientists," the paper concedes. The Growing Interest in UFOs Interest in UFOs and UAPs has surged in recent years, driven by both public fascination and governmental concern. Lawmakers and military officials worldwide have called for more research, often framing the issue as one of national and planetary security. Last year, David Grusch, a career intelligence officer turned whistleblower, testified before Congress, alleging that the U.S. government has been hiding a long-standing program dedicated to retrieving and reverse-engineering UFOs. Grusch claimed to have been tasked with identifying all highly classified programs related to UAPs. However, the Pentagon has denied these claims, stating that investigators have not found any verifiable evidence to support the existence of such programs. NASA has also weighed in on the matter, stating that while the search for extraterrestrial life is a key priority, there is currently no credible evidence to suggest that UAPs are of extraterrestrial origin. "One of NASA’s key priorities is the search for life elsewhere in the universe, but so far, NASA has not found any credible evidence of extraterrestrial life and there is no evidence that UAPs are extraterrestrial," a NASA statement read. Government Response and Public Perception The Harvard paper addresses the U.S. government's response to UAP sightings, noting that many people believe federal officials are deliberately downplaying or obscuring the extraordinary nature of many UAP-related events. This perception of obfuscation contributes to public mistrust and fuels further speculation about the true nature of these phenomena. The paper has yet to undergo peer review and will soon be published in the journal *Philosophy and Cosmology*. The authors hope that by proposing these unconventional hypotheses, they can stimulate a broader and more open-minded scientific inquiry into the mysteries of UAPs. Conclusion While the idea of hidden civilizations on Earth may seem like the stuff of science fiction, the Harvard researchers emphasize the importance of keeping an open mind. As our understanding of the universe and our place within it continues to evolve, so too must our willingness to explore all possible explanations for the phenomena we observe. Whether or not the cryptoterrestrial hypothesis holds water, it represents a bold step toward a more inclusive and imaginative approach to scientific inquiry. Credit: Global News CA 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Republican Kari Lake has lost her appeal in the Arizona Court of Appeals challenging the 2022 governor election results, where she was defeated by Democrat Katie Hobbs. The appeals court upheld the previous judge's decision that Lake failed to demonstrate that thousands of Phoenix-area mail ballot signatures were improperly verified. Maricopa County, which is home to over 60% of voters in Arizona, was at the center of the controversy over the verification of mail ballot signatures. Lake's attorney, Bryan James Blehm, did not respond to requests for comment on whether Lake would further appeal the decision to the Arizona Supreme Court. Blehm was also recently sanctioned by the State Bar of Arizona for making "unequivocally false" statements to the state Supreme Court during Lake's election challenges. His 60-day suspension will begin on July 7. Despite losing multiple court challenges, Kari Lake has refused to acknowledge her loss to Katie Hobbs by more than 17,000 votes. Lake, a former television news anchor, is currently running for U.S. Senate and is considered the frontrunner for the GOP primary. She is expected to face Democratic U.S. Rep. Ruben Gallego in the November election for the seat currently held by independent Kyrsten Sinema, who is not seeking re-election. Lake has been one of the most vocal candidates in the GOP, echoing former President Donald Trump's false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him. In the Appeals Court ruling, Presiding Judge Sean Brearcliffe highlighted Lake's argument that over 8,000 ballots were "maliciously misconfigured to cause a tabulator rejection" and were not counted. However, even if all these votes had been for Lake, it would not have been sufficient to overcome the 17,000-vote margin between Lake and Hobbs. The ruling further solidifies Katie Hobbs' victory in the 2022 Arizona governor race and underscores the challenges faced by candidates contesting election results in the state. Credit: AP News 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The Biden administration is frantically working to prevent the escalating violence between Israel and Hezbollah from escalating into a full-scale war, as U.S. officials express deep concern over the potential for a broader conflict. This delicate situation unfolds amidst ongoing efforts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza, with fears that a war with Hezbollah could drastically exacerbate the regional crisis and draw the United States deeper into the conflict. The administration has warned Israel in recent weeks about the dangers of engaging in what it might perceive as a "limited war" in Lebanon. Officials highlight the risk of Iranian intervention, cautioning that Iran could mobilize pro-Iranian militants from Syria, Iraq, and Yemen to join the conflict. U.S. officials are particularly apprehensive about Israel either rushing into a war with Hezbollah or being inadvertently dragged into one without a clear strategy and without considering the full implications of a wider conflict. Behind the scenes, the White House is striving to contain the skirmishes between Israel and Hezbollah while simultaneously working towards securing a ceasefire in Gaza. The belief among officials is that achieving a ceasefire in Gaza is crucial for significantly de-escalating tensions along the Israeli-Lebanese border. The situation has intensified following an Israeli airstrike on Tuesday that killed a senior Hezbollah commander, Taleb Sami Abdullah, in the town of Jwaya, around six miles north of the border. Abdullah, who headed the "Naser" unit responsible for operations along the eastern border with Israel, was the highest-ranking Hezbollah official killed since the conflict began on October 7. Hezbollah has since vowed to escalate its attacks against Israel, launching 200 rockets on Wednesday, marking the most extensive assault since the initial conflict began. One of the Israeli targets that Hezbollah attacked was a factory for armored vehicles. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin communicated with his Israeli counterpart, Yoav Gallant, expressing concerns about the increased activity in northern Israel and urging de-escalation. "We are concerned about an increase in activity in the north. We don't want this to escalate to a broad regional conflict, and we urge de-escalation," said Pentagon deputy spokeswoman Sabrina Singh. Concurrently, the commander of the Lebanese army, Gen. Joseph Aoun, is in Washington for discussions with White House and Pentagon officials, as well as members of Congress, about the current crisis. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, during a press conference in Doha, emphasized that no party desires a war. He stressed that most stakeholders believe there can and should be a diplomatic resolution to the differences that could ignite a broader conflict. "It's safe to say that actually no one is looking to start a war," Blinken said. "What I've heard from everyone concerned and others who are working on this is there's a strong preference for a diplomatic solution." While traveling with President Biden to the G7 summit in Italy, White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan expressed the administration's particular concern about the border exchanges with Lebanon. He stressed that the U.S. is in close consultation with Israel on this issue. "The U.S. is particularly concerned about the exchange of fire across the border with Lebanon," Sullivan told reporters aboard Air Force One. The Biden administration's efforts highlight the delicate balancing act required to prevent a regional conflict while pursuing a ceasefire in Gaza. As the U.S. engages in high-stakes diplomacy, the situation remains precarious, with the potential for rapid escalation posing a significant threat to regional stability. Credit: AXIOS 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The leadership of Hamas is exploiting Western efforts aimed at alleviating the suffering of Palestinians, using the situation for their own self-preservation. The West, particularly the Biden administration, has been driven by the desire to end the suffering endured by ordinary Palestinians since Hamas launched a devastating attack against Israel on October 7. Western initiatives have focused not only on securing the release of approximately 120 Israeli hostages held by Hamas but also on preventing further bloodshed among Palestinian civilians. The Biden administration has been particularly invested in reaching a ceasefire, securing support from the United Nations Security Council before Secretary of State Antony Blinken embarked on yet another diplomatic mission to the Middle East—his eighth since the Gaza conflict erupted. Despite these efforts, previous U.S. initiatives have often ended in failure, frequently attributed to the intransigence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu's insistence on continuing Israel's military campaign against Hamas, even if Hamas were to release all remaining Israeli hostages, is often cited as a key obstacle to achieving a truce. However, as recent developments reveal, it is not Netanyahu's uncompromising stance that is primarily thwarting peace efforts. Instead, the fanaticism of Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas mastermind behind the October 7 atrocities, is the main impediment. Sinwar, who once boasted of strangling a suspected Palestinian collaborator with his bare hands, spent 22 years in an Israeli prison for killing two Israeli soldiers and four Palestinians in the 1980s. Known as “The Butcher of Khan Yunis” after the Gazan enclave where he was born, Sinwar appears to have calculated that the inevitable Israeli military response to the October 7 attacks would ultimately benefit Hamas. Leaked messages from Sinwar to other Hamas commanders suggest that his strategy has been effective. By weaponizing the Gaza conflict, Sinwar has managed to shift much of the global criticism towards Israel, while the deceptive tactics employed by Hamas for their self-preservation often go unnoticed. Hamas's use of Palestinian civilians as human shields and its utilization of schools and hospitals as command centers highlight the group's cynical duplicity. A striking example of this duplicity emerged recently when it was revealed that a Palestinian journalist who regularly wrote articles condemning Israeli "genocide" in Gaza was himself using his home to hold Israeli hostages abducted during the October 7 attacks. This incident underscores the willingness of Hamas commanders to exploit Gaza's civilian population for their own ends. Sinwar's messages reveal his belief that the Palestinian death toll, exacerbated by Hamas's operations in densely populated areas, is a "necessary sacrifice." From his perspective, the global criticism directed at Israel means that "we have the Israelis right where we want them." This callous disregard for the Palestinian people is a critical factor that Western negotiators must consider in their efforts to broker a ceasefire. Since the conflict began, Sinwar's primary goal has been to ensure Hamas's survival in some form in Gaza, even if it means that only a fraction of its initial 24 battalions of fighters remains. This is why, whenever figures like Blinken arrive with new ceasefire proposals, Hamas immediately demands a complete Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza—an offer that even the most peace-seeking Israelis are unlikely to accept, as it would enable Hamas to continue its attacks on Israel’s southern border. Moreover, any ceasefire that allows Hamas to maintain control in Gaza would be seen as rewarding its leaders for their acts of terrorism. Now that Sinwar's contemptuous attitude towards the welfare of Palestinians has been exposed, it should be clear to Western policymakers that Hamas, not Israel, is the true obstacle to achieving lasting peace in Gaza. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Antisemitic vandals targeted the home of Brooklyn Museum director Anne Pasternak, defacing her co-op in Brooklyn Heights with disturbing symbols and messages. The most prominent of these was a red triangle painted on her front door, a symbol widely used in Hamas propaganda to mark targets for death. Photos from the scene show the red inverted triangle, a symbol that has gained notoriety since November 2023 following Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7 and Israel's subsequent retaliatory actions. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has documented that this symbol appeared in Hamas' al-Qassam Brigades propaganda videos to signify Israeli soldiers marked for targeted attacks. In these videos, the red triangle would follow a target, who would then be struck by a sniper's bullet, a rocket-propelled grenade, or another deadly weapon. The red triangle has since been adopted more broadly in anti-Zionist memes and political cartoons, where it symbolizes Hamas and glorifies violence against Israelis. The ADL notes that it can sometimes appear innocuously in general pro-Palestinian social media posts, but its use has become increasingly linked to calls for violence. Protesters have used the symbol over images of Israeli soldiers or the Star of David to call for further violent resistance. In addition to the red triangle, vandals scrawled antisemitic and anti-Zionist messages on Pasternak's home, including "Anne Pasternak Brooklyn Museum White Supremacist Zionist" and "You have blood on your hands." Other Jewish board members of the Brooklyn Museum were similarly targeted. New York City Mayor Eric Adams condemned the vandalism, asserting that it was not a case of peaceful protest or free speech but a crime of overt, unacceptable antisemitism. "This is a crime, and it’s overt, unacceptable anti-Semitism," Adams said in a statement. He apologized to Pasternak and vowed to bring those responsible to justice. Jewish leaders in New York have drawn parallels between the current rise in antisemitism and the atmosphere of the 1930s in Nazi Germany. Michael Nussbaum, former president of the Queens Jewish Community Council, warned, "We are experiencing and seeing the Nazi playbook come to life in 2024." He emphasized the concerted effort to marginalize Jewish identity from public life, reminiscent of tactics employed by the Nazis. Matthew Schweber, a lawyer with the Columbia University Jewish Alumni Association, likened the actions of the pro-Palestinian movement in New York to the Ku Klux Klan, asserting that such protests engage in targeted harassment and incitement of violence. "These protests are not protected under the First Amendment because they are engaged in targeted harassment and incitement of violence," Schweber said. Brooklyn Councilwoman Inna Vernikov, a Jewish Republican, highlighted the increasing boldness of antisemitic behavior, expressing fear for the safety of Jewish residents. "It’s a scary time for the Jews," she said. She criticized the weak leadership that has allowed such behavior to escalate, questioning, "What’s next? We’re going to see Jews killed in the streets?" Recent incidents in New York have underscored this growing threat. Protesters in Union Square unfurled a banner reading "Long live October 7," and anti-Israel agitators have harassed Jews, telling them they wished "Hitler was still here." Vandals also splattered red paint on the homes of Jewish board members, and masked protesters have taken over subway cars, demanding that "Zionists" reveal themselves and leave. Jewish leaders are now calling for the reinstatement of New York's anti-mask law, previously used to combat the Ku Klux Klan, to strip violent protesters of their anonymity. Assemblyman Michael Reilly has introduced legislation to reinstate the mask ban, arguing that it is essential to prevent mobs from inciting fear and violence without facing consequences. The rise in antisemitic hate crimes in New York has been alarming, with a 150% increase in May compared to the same month last year, according to NYPD crime statistics. The total number of anti-Jewish hate crimes recorded this year has already surpassed those in the same period in 2023. This disturbing trend has prompted urgent calls for action to protect Jewish New Yorkers and combat the escalating tide of antisemitism. Credit: NYP 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A link to a site that publishes false stories and promotes anti-GMO propaganda. has been removed. The topic here is: UN Security Council Approves US-Led Ceasefire Plan for Israel-Gaza Conflict Please stay on topic if you want your post to remain. Additional posts removed including a reply with multiple nested quotes and no comments. Another off topic post removed, along with a comment on moderation.

A number of hate speech posts have been removed along with replies.

New Topics: Harrowing Captivity: The Ordeal and Rescue of Hostages Held by Hamas https://aseannow.com/topic/1329625-harrowing-captivity-the-ordeal-and-rescue-of-hostages-held-by-hamas/ U.N. Blacklists Israel and Hamas Over Grave Violations Against Children https://aseannow.com/topic/1329631-un-blacklists-israel-and-hamas-over-grave-violations-against-children/

Post removed for contravening community standards and inflamatory remarks

An investigation by the Financial Times has uncovered that Ukrainian children, abducted and taken to Russia during the Kremlin's 2022 invasion, have been listed for adoption on Russian government-linked websites. Using advanced image recognition tools, public records, and interviews with Ukrainian officials and relatives of the children, the FT identified and located four such children on the adoption website usynovite.ru. The findings contribute to the growing body of evidence suggesting that Russia's actions constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity. The International Criminal Court, Ukrainian government officials, and legal experts have been scrutinizing these actions, particularly the forced deportation and adoption of Ukrainian children. Among the identified children, one was found with a falsified Russian identity, including a new name and age that did not match their Ukrainian documentation. Another child was shown using a Russianized version of their Ukrainian name, with no mention of their true Ukrainian background. These children, aged between eight and fifteen, were taken from state care homes in regions of Ukraine that fell under Russian control during the invasion. They have been traced to locations in the Tula region near Moscow, the Orenburg region close to the Kazakh border, and occupied Crimea. The investigation also referenced a New York Times report that confirmed an additional seventeen Ukrainian children on the adoption website, all from a children’s home in Kherson. This adds to the grim tally of nearly 20,000 Ukrainian children who Ukrainian authorities estimate have been forcibly taken to Russia since the invasion began in February 2022. Many of these children are still missing. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Russian President Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia’s Commissioner for Children’s Rights, accusing them of being criminally responsible for the unlawful deportation of children. The Kremlin has not responded to requests for comment but has consistently denied abducting children, claiming instead that the actions were for their protection—a claim contradicted by substantial evidence. Putin has signed decrees facilitating the fast-track acquisition of Russian citizenship for Ukrainian children, further complicating efforts to return them. Ukrainian officials, charities, and the children’s relatives and guardians face significant challenges in tracking down and retrieving these children, a process that can take months and involve perilous journeys into Russia. Families who have managed to bring their children back recount harrowing experiences of coercion, abuse, and forced assimilation into Russian culture. Children have been reported to suffer from verbal and physical abuse, forced to adopt Russian identities, and denied contact with their relatives. One mother, Svitlana Popova, described her heartbreak upon discovering that her daughter, abducted by Russian soldiers, had been given a forged birth certificate indicating a Russian origin. Wayne Jordash, president of Global Rights Compliance, highlighted that forcibly transferring or deporting children is a war crime. When done as part of a widespread or systematic attack on a civilian population, as in Russia’s actions against Ukraine, these acts also qualify as crimes against humanity. He emphasized that changing children’s identities and putting them up for adoption demonstrates a clear criminal intent. The Financial Times worked closely with the Ukrainian Child Rights Protection Centre (CRPC) to confirm the identities of the children. The CRPC, a state body, is awaiting further confirmation on two more children identified by the FT. The center is actively working with relatives to facilitate the return of these children to Ukraine. Dmytro Lubinets, the Ukrainian parliament commissioner for human rights, underscored that Russia's actions were premeditated, citing documents shared by Ukrainian officials that reveal Kremlin plans for the forced deportation of Ukrainian children. These documents outline a "filtration" process devised ahead of the invasion. Daria Herasymchuk, an adviser and commissioner for children’s rights to the President of Ukraine, characterized Russia’s actions as part of a “well-planned genocide policy.” She emphasized the scale of the crime, noting the large number of kidnapped children. As of June 11, Ukraine has successfully returned at least 389 children from Russia, according to the president’s office. The efforts to return more children continue, with the CRPC and Ukraine’s human rights commissioner’s office working to confirm the identities of dozens more Ukrainian children flagged by the FT. One such child has been located, and plans are underway to bring them back to Ukraine. Credit: Financial Times 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The UK economy experienced zero growth in April, according to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This stagnation has provided ammunition for the Labour and Liberal Democrat parties, who argue that the Conservative government's economic strategies are failing. The ONS report highlighted that heavy rainfall, marking the wettest April in 12 years, contributed to a decline in retail sales and construction output, significantly impacting the overall GDP. The report revealed that GDP growth in April was flat, a sharp contrast to the 0.4% increase recorded in March. This outcome aligns with predictions from a Reuters poll of economists, who had anticipated a 0% growth due to the adverse weather conditions. The ONS data showed UK rainfall at 155% of the long-term average for April, leading to a 1.4% decline in construction output. This decline was also influenced by poor demand for construction products in the manufacturing sector. Production saw a 0.9% drop, while the services sector, which accounts for nearly 80% of the UK’s total output, grew by just 0.2%. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s narrative of an improving economy has been called into question by these figures. The UK had just emerged from a brief recession at the end of 2023, with 0.6% growth recorded in the first quarter of the current year. However, expectations for the second quarter are more modest, with economists predicting around 0.3% growth, half the rate achieved between January and March. The general election set for July 4 looms large, with these economic indicators likely to play a significant role in campaign narratives. Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves criticized the Conservative government, stating, "Rishi Sunak claims we have turned a corner, but the economy has stalled and there is no growth. These figures expose the damage done after 14 years of Conservative chaos." Reeves outlined Labour’s plan to grow the economy by bringing back stability, unlocking private sector investment, and reforming the planning system. She dismissed the Conservative's approach as "more of the same," describing it as a "desperate wish list of unfunded spending promises that will mean £4,800 more on people's mortgages. Rishi Sunak's plan is a recipe for five more years of Tory chaos." Liberal Democrat Treasury spokeswoman Sarah Olney echoed these sentiments, arguing that the lack of growth in April showed the Conservatives had "utterly failed" to deliver on their promises. "As Rishi Sunak's time as prime minister peters out, so does the UK's economic growth," she said. Olney criticized the Conservatives for presiding over stagnation and economic misery for hardworking families across the country, stating, "The Conservatives' manifesto shows they simply lack the ambition and vision to get the economy moving again. It's clear for voters across the country that the only way to make it happen is to vote them out of office on July 4." Chancellor Jeremy Hunt remained optimistic despite the disappointing figures. He insisted, "There is more to do, but the economy is turning a corner and inflation is back down to normal." Hunt emphasized that the Conservatives would continue to "keep the economy growing with our clear plan to cut taxes on work, homes and pensions." Looking ahead, the economic projections for the rest of the year remain cautious. Yael Selfin, chief economist at KPMG UK, suggested that there could be renewed momentum in the coming months, supported by an improvement in consumer sentiment as pay growth remains strong. She noted that the early summer general election could help resolve political uncertainties, potentially providing a boost for business investment. However, Selfin warned that whichever party wins the election will have to contend with several supply-side challenges that will constrain the UK's long-term growth potential. She predicted that economic activity would remain sluggish in historical terms this year, with growth expected to be just 0.5%. As the election approaches, the latest economic data will undoubtedly fuel further debate and scrutiny of the Conservative government's policies, with opposition parties seizing every opportunity to highlight what they see as the failures of the current administration. The electorate will have to weigh these arguments carefully as they decide which party can best navigate the UK through its current economic challenges. Credit: Sky News 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In just three years, Stephen Watson, the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (GMP), has transformed a beleaguered force into one of the UK's most improved, according to the official police watchdog. Watson, 55, who describes his leadership style as "back-to-basics," has focused on fundamental policing principles and earned praise from former Conservative home secretaries Priti Patel and Suella Braverman, as well as current Home Secretary James Cleverly. This acclaim comes despite his appointment by Labour's Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor who dismissed Watson's predecessor. Watson’s strategy, which emphasizes getting officers back on the beat, has garnered attention from both political sides, fueling speculation that he might eventually become Britain's most senior officer, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. His tenure has not been without challenges, including navigating the complex investigation into Angela Rayner, the deputy Labour leader, and addressing the fallout from GMP’s wrongful conviction of Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Meeting Watson in his office on the fourth floor, adorned with a portrait of Elizabeth II and views of the city skyline, it's clear he embodies a disciplined, military-like presence. Wearing his full police uniform, Watson shares his vision and recounts the transformation of GMP with precise statistics. When he took charge in the summer of 2021, GMP was in "special measures" for failing to record 80,000 crimes—nearly a fifth of that year's total. Emergency response times were the worst in the country, and the force faced severe criticism for its handling of domestic abuse and sexual assault cases. Under Watson's leadership, every crime is now investigated, emergency response times have improved significantly, and arrests for domestic abuse have doubled within a year. Overall crime has decreased by 7.7%. The number of stop-and-searches has quadrupled to 46,029 in a year, contributing to significant reductions in robberies, firearms offenses, and knife injuries. "It is about leadership and having an effective plan," Watson asserts, detailing the force’s successes: "In 12 months, neighborhood crime is down 15.4%, burglary is down 24 points, vehicle crime is down 16.2%, robbery is down 11.2%, theft from the person is down 3.9%." Watson’s philosophy involves shifting the force from a reactive to a proactive stance on crime. "We pick up the phone, we get to people quickly, we make accurate records, we investigate all reasonable lines of inquiry. We bring people to justice," he explains. He emphasizes focusing on tangible crime-fighting measures rather than what he sees as distractions from "woke" causes and social media. "Whether it be through adulterating the uniform with pins and badges and having all manner of florid social media accounts—these are all things that I don’t think have a place in policing," Watson states. His approach recalls the "broken windows" theory of policing, advocating for addressing minor offenses to prevent more serious crimes. "I expect my officers to enforce moving traffic offenses, litter and graffiti, right the way up through the spectrum. It’s as much about the small stuff as it is about the big stuff," Watson explains. He believes neglecting minor crimes leads to broader societal decay, exemplified by Manchester's Cheetham Hill district, which he transformed from the counterfeit capital of the UK into a safer area through rigorous enforcement and multiple raids. Watson and his deputy chief constable Terry Woods recently completed their annual strategy briefings with over 5,000 staff members, outlining their vision for the year. These meetings, initially termed “giants” to symbolize awakening the "sleeping giant" of GMP, have now dropped the "sleeping" part, reflecting the force's revitalization. Part of their success stems from connecting with frontline officers and emphasizing a return to professionalism, including strict dress codes and smart uniforms. "If you turn up to work, if you’re a female officer, you tie your hair up, if you’re a man you’ve had a shave, you press your clothing, you polish your boots, you look smart, and you look professional. We’re very uncompromising on that," says Watson. His leadership style is influenced by his family’s military background. Watson, originally from Warrington, grew up in Rhodesia where his father was a naval officer before the family returned to Britain in 1981. Initially considering a career in the Navy, he was persuaded to join the police by two GMP officers he met in Manchester. Watson joined Lancashire Constabulary in 1988 and steadily rose through the ranks, eventually becoming a key staff officer to Pauline Clare, the first female chief constable in Britain. His experience in this role provided him with invaluable insights into managing a police force. Watson's career trajectory includes significant roles such as chief superintendent in Merseyside, where he handled one of the toughest areas of the city, and a commander in the Met Police, where he played key roles in operations like the Vauxhall helicopter crash response and restoring public confidence after the 2011 riots. He then served as deputy chief constable in Durham, the best performing force in England and Wales, before transforming the "failing" South Yorkshire force into one of the most improved in the country. A dedicated family man, Watson maintains a base in Lancashire with his wife, Jane, and their two adult children. His unpretentious nature and loyalty have earned him respect within the force. "He doesn’t try to be something he’s not," says Deputy Chief Constable Woods. Watson's tenure at GMP began with the force ranked 43rd out of 43 in performance ratings. Today, GMP boasts some of the fastest 999 response times and improved crime-solving rates. "We are midway through a journey. We aspire to be outstandingly good at serious and organized crime, neighborhood policing, and child protection," Watson states, aiming to sustain GMP’s momentum amid tightening budgets and economic challenges. Watson’s ultimate goal is for GMP to be recognized as the most improved force in the country for the third consecutive year, a testament to his effective leadership and commitment to fundamental policing principles. Credit: Daily Telepgraph 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

President Joe Biden is currently favored to defeat Donald Trump in the upcoming 2024 election, according to a forecast model by the polling and forecasting website 538, formerly known as FiveThirtyEight. In a prediction simulation conducted by 538, Biden emerged victorious 53 times out of 100, while Trump won 47 times out of 100. This forecast considers a variety of factors, including adjusted polling averages, economic and political indicators, and demographic data. With less than five months remaining until the 2024 election, Biden and Trump, who is the presumptive Republican nominee, appear to be in a tight race, reminiscent of their previous contest. Biden, at 81 years old, is facing the election with historically low approval ratings and ongoing concerns about his age. On the other hand, Trump is attempting to secure a second term despite becoming the first U.S. president in history to be convicted of a crime, with a New York jury finding him guilty of 34 felony counts in a hush money trial last month. On June 11, 538 published their official forecast for the 2024 election, showing Biden slightly ahead in what is expected to be a close race. The model predicts that Biden has a 53-in-100 chance of winning the election, indicating that he is slightly more likely than Trump to come out on top. Trump, with a 47-in-100 chance, is not far behind, suggesting that the election outcome could still swing either way as November approaches. G. Elliott Morris, a data journalist for 538, explained the forecast's range of realistic Electoral College outcomes: “The range of realistic Electoral College outcomes generated by our forecasting model stretches from 132 to 445 electoral votes for Biden—a testament to how much things could change by November (and how off the polls could be).” Despite Biden's slight lead, Trump is currently just ahead in the polls, particularly in key swing states that could determine the election's outcome. The forecast model also incorporates various economic and political indicators that may favor Biden. Morris noted, "To forecast the election, we rely primarily on polls asking voters whom they support. However, our forecast also incorporates various economic and political indicators that aren't related to polling but can be used to make rough predictions for the election." Historical trends also suggest that incumbent presidents have a better chance when running for reelection. However, predictions can be skewed due to high political polarization, as is currently the case. Historian and writer Varad Mehta highlighted an alternative view on X (formerly Twitter), noting that DDHQ's forecast slightly favors Trump. The difference in predictions lies in their assessments of the key "blue wall" states, with 538 forecasting Biden winning all three and DDHQ predicting Trump victories in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin based on current polling data. Lawyer James Debate commented on the 538 forecast, saying, "Biden narrowly favored to win Presidential election according to 538's new forecast. I've been dunking a lot on 538 this cycle, but this is a surprisingly solid forecast and seems about right for the current polling." He also noted that 538 might be overestimating Kennedy's vote share, suggesting that third-party candidates' support tends to be overrated in polls. 538 plans to rerun its forecast simulator daily until November's election, updating it based on the latest data. This approach aims to provide the most accurate prediction possible as the political landscape continues to evolve leading up to Election Day. Credit: Newsweek 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a significant move, the North Carolina House of Representatives has passed a revised mask ban, targeting protesters and significantly impacting the public's ability to wear masks on private property. The legislation, passed with a vote of 69 to 43, now awaits the decision of Democratic Governor Roy Cooper. Despite modifications that permit medical or surgical masks to prevent the spread of contagious diseases, the bill has sparked considerable debate and concern among various groups. The bill's journey to the House floor was marked by controversy. Originally introduced to curb the wearing of masks during Pro-Palestinian protests and encampments, it reflects broader tensions surrounding public demonstrations and civil liberties. While the bill allows for certain health exemptions, it also empowers property owners, such as grocery stores and workplaces, to demand the removal of masks if requested. Opponents of the bill have voiced strong objections. Democratic State Representative Maria Cervania highlighted that the bill's narrow focus on contagious diseases neglects those who wear masks for other health reasons, such as allergies or compromised immune systems. Her colleague, Democratic State Representative Pricey Harrison, expressed personal concerns about the impact on individuals with asthma and the potential for racial targeting under the new law. Healthcare professionals have also raised alarms. Dr. Diana Cejas, a pediatric neurologist at the University of North Carolina, emphasized the risks faced by immunocompromised individuals and those with chronic illnesses. She argued that despite legislative assurances, the reality would likely involve increased scrutiny and harassment for those needing to wear masks for health reasons. "Some of our legislators have made the argument that this ban won’t apply to those of us who mask for medical reasons, but I think that we all know that won’t be true," Dr. Cejas said. "We already face scrutiny and outright harassment at times for the ‘crime’ of trying to protect ourselves from illness, particularly us disabled and chronically ill people of color and those with other marginalized identities." The bill's passage comes at a critical time, with a new subvariant of the coronavirus spreading across the United States. This has exacerbated concerns that the mask ban could hinder efforts to curb the virus's spread. The legislation's stipulation that people can be required to remove masks on private property has added a layer of complexity to public health measures, potentially undermining confidence in the state's response to the ongoing pandemic. Provisions in the bill allow for certain exemptions, such as costume masks on Halloween, but these concessions have done little to quell the broader concerns about its impact on public health and civil liberties. The bill's opponents argue that it represents a step backward in protecting vulnerable populations and maintaining public safety. Governor Roy Cooper's decision on whether to veto the bill will be closely watched. However, even if he does veto it, the General Assembly holds the power to override his decision, given the current political composition. This potential override adds another layer of uncertainty and concern for those opposed to the legislation. The revised mask ban reflects broader national debates about public health, civil liberties, and the balance between safety and freedom. As North Carolina navigates these issues, the outcome of this legislation will likely have significant implications for public policy and individual rights in the state. Credit: Mother Jones 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A recent survey from the British Social Attitudes (BSA) has revealed a significant shift in public opinion regarding transgender rights in the UK. Nearly half of Britons now believe that transgender people should not be allowed to change the sex listed on their birth certificates. This figure has more than doubled since 2019, indicating a notable change in societal perspectives over a relatively short period. In 2019, only 24 percent of respondents were opposed to the idea of altering the sex on birth certificates. In contrast, more than half (53 percent) supported the right of transgender individuals to make such changes. Today, that support has drastically decreased, with just over a quarter (26 percent) agreeing that a transgender person should be able to change the sex recorded on their birth certificate. This shift comes amid ongoing debates and political discussions surrounding gender identity and transgender rights. Political and Social Context The change in public opinion coincides with recent political developments and discussions. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has pledged to amend the Equality Act to define "sex" explicitly as "biological sex." This move aims to protect women’s spaces such as lavatories and changing rooms. Sunak has emphasized that “someone’s sex at birth should define whether the law sees them as male or female.” This proposal is part of the Conservative manifesto, which was launched recently and seeks to provide clarity on the legal definitions of sex and gender. The Cass Report and Its Implications The publication of the Cass report earlier this year has also influenced public attitudes. The report concluded that children who believe they are transgender should not be rushed into medical treatments that they may later regret. This cautious approach to gender identity in children has sparked further debate and likely contributed to the shifting perspectives highlighted by the BSA survey. Political Debate and Its Impact on Public Opinion The National Centre for Social Research (NCSR), which commissioned the survey, suggested that the intense political debate on gender self-identification has played a role in changing public attitudes. The survey found that nearly half of Britons (47 percent) believe that efforts to ensure equal opportunities for transgender people have gone too far, while 22 percent think they have not gone far enough. This represents a significant change since the question was first introduced in 2021, when about a third of people felt that efforts had gone too far, and another third believed they had not gone far enough. Trust in Government and Politicians at an All-Time Low The survey also highlighted a record low in public trust toward the government and politicians. Forty-five percent of respondents stated that they “almost never” believe that governments prioritize the needs of the country over internal party interests. This distrust is the highest recorded since 2009, following the MPs’ expenses scandal. Additionally, 58 percent of respondents said they “almost never” trust politicians to tell the truth when facing challenging situations, marking a 19-point increase from 2020. Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice commented on these findings, noting that the next government will need to address the concerns of a public that is increasingly skeptical about the trustworthiness and efficacy of the country's system of government. The findings from the British Social Attitudes survey reflect a significant shift in public opinion on transgender rights and broader political trust issues in the UK. With nearly half of the population now opposing changes to birth certificate sex markers for transgender individuals and a substantial portion believing that efforts for transgender equality have gone too far, it is clear that these issues will continue to be hotly debated. As political leaders navigate these complex and contentious topics, they will also need to rebuild public trust in their ability to govern effectively and honestly. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In an account of extreme adversity and resilience, the recent rescue of hostages Almog Meir Jan, Shlomi Ziv, and Andrey Kozlov from Hamas captivity in Gaza has revealed the severe physical and psychological abuse they endured over eight months. The Wall Street Journal reported on their plight, citing testimonies from relatives, Israeli security, and medical officials. The three men were captured during the violent incursion by Hamas-led terrorists at the Nova music festival in the Reim area on October 7. This attack resulted in the deaths of nearly 1,200 people and the abduction of over 250 hostages. Among the captives, the ordeal of Ziv, Meir Jan, and Kozlov was particularly harrowing. According to the Journal, the hostages were confined to a single dark room for six months. They had no contact with the outside world except through their interactions with their captors. The conditions they faced were severe and brutal. The captors enforced strict rules, and any failure to comply was met with harsh punishments. These punishments included being locked in a bathroom or being buried under blankets in intense heat, which was a form of both physical and psychological torture. The captors also frequently threatened to kill them, instilling a constant sense of fear and hopelessness. They told the hostages that no one would come for them and that nobody cared about them, further exacerbating their mental anguish. Despite these inhumane conditions, the three men found ways to cope and maintain their sanity. They played cards, wrote journals, and taught each other languages—Arabic, Hebrew, and Russian. These activities not only helped pass the time but also forged a close bond among them, which was crucial for their mental survival. The close relationship they developed provided emotional support and a sense of solidarity that kept them going through the darkest times. Their rescue, which took place in central Gaza’s Nuseirat refugee camp, was a complex operation involving Israeli security forces. Along with Meir Jan, Ziv, and Kozlov, Noa Argamani was also rescued. She had been held in a separate location about 200 yards away from the men. The operation was not without casualties. Hamas's government media office claimed that at least 274 people were killed during the rescue, although this figure has not been independently verified and does not distinguish between combatants and civilians. Israel reported that fewer than 100 people were killed, some of whom were civilians. Upon their return, the hostages exhibited signs of severe physical and psychological distress. They were treated at Sheba Hospital near Tel Aviv. Dr. Itai Pessach, who treated the hostages, noted that they had been beaten "almost every day" during their captivity. The hostages were malnourished to the point of muscle atrophy, and their weight had fluctuated significantly due to the stress, fear, and maltreatment they endured. Despite their cheerful demeanor upon rescue, which Dr. Pessach attributed to the adrenaline rush from the operation, the long-term effects of their ordeal were evident. The physical toll of their captivity was apparent. Meir Jan’s uncle, Aviram Meir, observed that his nephew’s skin was pale from months without sunlight. Although the hostages had been allowed to groom themselves in captivity and did not appear emaciated, their overall health was severely compromised. Dr. Pessach remarked on the gravity of their condition, stating, "We’ve heard stories that are beyond anything you can imagine." One particularly uplifting moment during their captivity came on May 11, Almog Meir Jan’s birthday. The hostages were allowed to watch Al Jazeera’s Arabic channel and saw a Tel Aviv hostage rally where Almog’s face was on a poster. This moment gave Almog a renewed sense of hope and reassurance that he had not been forgotten, providing a rare emotional lift during their confinement. "It made him feel he hadn’t been forgotten," said his uncle. The rescue operation has been a source of immense relief for the hostages’ families and friends, yet the trauma of their experience is profound. The Israeli security officials have advised the hostages and their families to avoid discussing the details of their captivity to protect their mental health and ongoing security concerns. Historically, detailed accounts of such experiences emerge only after the hostages have had time to recover and process their trauma. The broader context of the hostage situation remains grim. As of now, it is believed that 116 hostages are still held by Hamas in Gaza. The fates of these individuals are uncertain, with not all of them expected to be alive. Previous operations have led to the release of some hostages and the recovery of several bodies. Since the initial attack, seven hostages have been rescued alive, while the bodies of 19 hostages have been recovered. Tragically, three of these hostages were mistakenly killed during military operations. The IDF has confirmed the deaths of 41 hostages, citing new intelligence and findings from troops operating in Gaza. Additionally, one person remains missing since the October 7 attack, with their fate still unknown. Hamas is also holding two Israeli civilians who entered the Gaza Strip in 2014 and 2015, as well as the bodies of two IDF soldiers who were killed in 2014. The ongoing conflict and the continued captivity of these individuals underscore the complex and perilous nature of the situation in the region. Related Topic: IDF Rescue Four Israeli Hostages in Central Gaza Raid Credit: TOS & WSJ 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

On June 12, the United Nations released its annual Children in Armed Conflict report, marking a significant development by including Israel and Hamas on the blacklist for the first time. The report highlights a disturbing 155% surge in "grave violations" against children within the Israel-Hamas conflict, identifying both parties as perpetrators of severe rights abuses against minors. The report, set to be published on Thursday, specifically calls out the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for the killing and maiming of children, along with attacks on schools and hospitals. Conversely, it accuses Hamas and Islamic Jihad of killing, injuring, and abducting children. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described the conflict as having an "appalling, dramatic increase and unprecedented scale and intensity of grave violations against children," with the children in Gaza bearing the brunt of the suffering. Guterres expressed his profound disturbance over the "brutal acts of terror" against children carried out by Palestinian armed groups during the October 7 attacks, which resulted in 38 children killed and 42 taken hostage. He emphasized the importance of investigating reports of sexual violence. The report indicates that "some 19,887 Palestinian children were reported killed or maimed" in Gaza and the West Bank, though it notes that these numbers had not been verified. However, the U.N. has corroborated over 8,000 serious violations against 4,247 Palestinian children and 113 Israeli children in 2023 alone. It is also processing a backlog of 2,000 cases involving reports of killed and injured children. The majority of these incidents were attributed to the use of explosive weapons in populated areas by Israeli armed and security forces. Additional violations were attributed to unidentified perpetrators (58), Israeli settlers (51), Islamic Jihad (21), lone Palestinians (13), and the Palestinian Authority Security Forces (one incident). The pre-release of the report to Israeli officials sparked a furious reaction. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the U.N.'s decision, stating, "The U.N. has put itself on the blacklist of history when it joined the supporters of the Hamas murderers. The IDF is the most moral army in the world and no delusional decision by the U.N. will change that." Israeli ambassador to the U.N., Gilad Erdan, echoed this sentiment on social media, denouncing the inclusion of the IDF alongside groups known for harming children as "simply outrageous and wrong." Erdan argued that Hamas uses children as tools for terrorism and schools and hospitals as military compounds. He accused the U.N. Secretary-General of incentivizing and encouraging terrorism, motivated by hatred towards Israel. The U.N. report frames these breaches by Israel and Hamas within a broader context of widespread child rights violations in global conflicts. This includes significant violations in Ukraine and Sudan, with an overall 21% increase in grave violations against children. The Sudanese Armed Forces and the rival Rapid Support Forces were also blacklisted for killing and injuring children, attacking schools and hospitals, and in the case of RSF, for using child soldiers and committing sexual violence. Violations against children in Sudan have escalated nearly five-fold since the civil war erupted in April 2023. Russia's armed forces and affiliated groups were listed for the second consecutive year due to their actions in Ukraine, where they were responsible for the deaths of 80 Ukrainian children and the maiming of 419, primarily through the use of explosive weapons. The U.N. Security Council is scheduled to discuss the report on June 26. Blacklisted governments and groups can potentially have their names removed by developing and implementing a plan to address and rectify these violations. Credit: UPI 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe