Social Media

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently dined with President-elect Donald Trump at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, signaling a surprising thaw in what was once a tense relationship between the two. Historically, the tech mogul and Trump have not shared a cordial rapport, with tensions peaking when Trump was barred from Meta platforms Facebook and Instagram following the Capitol riots in 2021. Trump, in turn, had publicly threatened Zuckerberg with jail if he interfered in the 2024 presidential election. The dinner appears to mark a significant shift in their relationship. A Meta spokesperson told the BBC, "Mark was grateful for the invitation to join President Trump for dinner and the opportunity to meet with members of his team about the incoming administration. It’s an important time for the future of American innovation." Trump’s stance on Zuckerberg has softened in recent months. In August, the president-elect wrote in a book that Zuckerberg would “spend the rest of his life in prison” if he attempted to influence the 2024 election. However, by October, Trump struck a more conciliatory tone, acknowledging during a podcast interview that it was "nice" Zuckerberg was "staying out of the election." Trump also expressed gratitude for a personal call from Zuckerberg following an assassination attempt on his life. Zuckerberg, too, has appeared to adopt a more accommodating approach. His suspension of Trump from Meta platforms was lifted earlier this year. Additionally, Zuckerberg has publicly expressed regret for Meta’s decision to de-emphasize content related to allegations against Hunter Biden prior to the 2020 election, a move that some conservatives criticized as biased. He has also pledged to avoid further contributions to electoral infrastructure, after a $400 million donation in 2020 sparked controversy. Zuckerberg has maintained that his intentions were non-partisan and aimed at supporting fair elections. While the specifics of the Mar-a-Lago dinner remain undisclosed, the timing of the meeting is noteworthy. Meta continues to face significant regulatory challenges, including an antitrust case filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in 2020. Strengthening ties with the incoming administration could potentially influence how these challenges unfold. Despite these developments, Zuckerberg’s budding relationship with Trump has been overshadowed by the president-elect’s close alliance with Elon Musk. The owner of X (formerly Twitter) has not only endorsed Trump but has also contributed over $100 million to his campaign. Musk’s influence has grown to such an extent that he has been appointed to lead a new Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, granting him significant sway over both government policy and regulatory matters. As Trump continues to build his administration, the evolving dynamics between big tech leaders and the president-elect offer a glimpse into how innovation and regulation may shape under his leadership. For Zuckerberg, the dinner at Mar-a-Lago might represent more than just a reconciliation—it could be a strategic move to secure Meta’s future amidst increasing scrutiny. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-30

Texas is evaluating a plan to redirect buses carrying migrants to federal detention centers rather than sanctuary cities, aiming to facilitate quicker deportations, according to a source in the Lone Star State government. This initiative would expand Operation Lone Star, the state's ongoing effort to deter illegal crossings at its border. “We are always gonna be involved in border security so long as we’re a border state,” the source stated. “We spent a lot of taxpayer money to have the level of deterrent that we have on the border and we can’t just walk away.” The plan, not yet approved by Governor Greg Abbott, involves chartering buses from border towns and rerouting them to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities, bypassing cities such as New York, Chicago, and Denver, which had previously received migrants under the busing program. By collaborating with ICE, Texas aims to expedite processing and deportation while receiving federal reimbursement for transportation costs. “That’s a way we could be involved in that, and of course they would reimburse us for paying for the [bus] contract,” the source explained. Tom Homan, the incoming border czar under President-elect Donald Trump, expressed interest in the proposal and hinted at a potential partnership. “I look forward to discussing that with them,” Homan said, referring to his upcoming talks with Texas officials. “We’re going to help them finish this job and secure Texas, and we’re going to work in partnership. And [Abbott] doesn’t have to worry about this administration suing him … to secure the Texas border.” Texas first launched its migrant busing program in 2022, sending nearly 120,000 individuals to major cities like New York, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and Chicago. The initiative was intended to highlight border challenges to the rest of the nation. New York City alone received approximately 45,900 migrants during that period. The program paused during the summer of 2023 after illegal crossings into Texas declined, a decrease attributed to enhanced state border security efforts. The recent election of Donald Trump signaled a shift in national border policy, as voters rejected what Texas State Representative Brian Harrison described as President Biden’s “radical open borders policies” that “made less Americans safe.” In preparation for the incoming Trump administration, Texas is already offering land for new deportation centers along the border. Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham confirmed the state’s readiness. “My office has identified several of our properties and is standing by ready to make this happen on Day One of the Trump presidency,” Buckingham said during a border visit this week. Homan emphasized that the first wave of deportations would focus on illegal migrants deemed threats to public safety and national security. This prioritization aligns with Texas’s renewed commitment to safeguarding its border and its communities, an effort underscored by its determination to partner with federal authorities for efficient enforcement. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-30

A 27-year-old man from Bradford was arrested this morning (Wednesday, November 27, 2024) on suspicion of voyeurism and harassment, following a series of reports involving women being followed, filmed, and harassed in Manchester City Centre. This arrest is believed to be the first in the UK linked to viral social media videos that appear to show women on nights out, some in vulnerable situations. The investigation revealed that alongside publicly posted videos, additional disturbing content was discovered on paywalled accounts. These included footage suspected to depict non-consensual nudity and upskirting. Authorities initially became aware of the issue after public concerns were raised about the videos, prompting appeals for those directly affected to come forward. Many women responded, sharing how these incidents had caused fear and undermined their sense of safety while out at night. The videos primarily captured scenes around the Peter Street and Deansgate areas of Manchester. Chief Inspector Wiggins further explained, "Everyone has the right to feel safe as they enjoy a night out, and these videos have made people, particularly women, not feel like that, which we can’t tolerate. Filming in public is legal, however, where this filming crosses the line into offences such as upskirting, stalking or harassment, it’s important that we don’t allow that behaviour." Highlighting proactive measures, he added, "Every Friday and Saturday there are approximately 60 officers on patrol around our city centre hotspots, also with support from partners, charities, and volunteers. Collectively, we are all on the lookout for any behaviour that appears predatory in nature, proactively challenging that behaviour and safeguarding anyone who is vulnerable." As Manchester prepares for the festive season, Wiggins reassured the public of the safety measures in place. "Particularly as we enter one of our busiest periods in the year, Christmas and New Year, I want to reassure the public that Manchester City Centre’s nightlife is safe, and they can expect us to take action against anyone who threatens that." The man is currently in custody for questioning as the investigation continues. Authorities have encouraged anyone personally impacted by the content of these videos to come forward, ensuring their experiences are recorded and aiding ongoing inquiries. Based on a report by Greater Manchester Police 2024-11-30

Sky News host Erin Molan delivered a scathing critique of UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese following remarks made during an interview on *Piers Morgan Uncensored*. The heated discussion revolved around Albanese’s hesitation to explicitly acknowledge reports of rape that occurred during the October 7 attacks in Israel and its periphery. The topic, fraught with distressing details, has sparked widespread controversy and intense emotions as ongoing investigations seek to verify reports of sexual violence amid the broader conflict. Albanese’s reluctance to confirm the allegations during the interview has drawn criticism from commentators who argue that such a position undermines the gravity of the claims. As the situation continues to unfold, debates persist over the role of international officials and their responsibility in addressing allegations of atrocities with clarity and sensitivity. Molan’s reaction underscores the frustration felt by many who believe that the acknowledgment of such crimes should be unequivocal in the face of compelling evidence. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-11-30

When it comes to net migration in the UK, confusion reigns supreme. Is it going up? Or is it going down? The answer, as it turns out, is both – but with a heavier lean towards the former. The complexity lies not in the debate itself but in the data underpinning it, which is often revised and reinterpreted. To understand this dynamic issue, we must delve into how migration figures are calculated and why they’re subject to significant shifts. Take, for example, net migration data from the 12 months preceding June 2022. A year ago, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported this figure as 672,000. At the time, it was strikingly high, drawing considerable attention. Yet, the ONS also noted that net migration appeared to be on the decline, with this number lower than the prior quarter. For government ministers and the media, this was cause for optimism, as it allowed them to claim that migration was decreasing. However, as is often the case with provisional data, this figure did not hold. The ONS later revised its estimates, revealing that more people entered the UK and fewer left than originally believed. The result? The net migration figure for the same period was recalculated to a staggering 907,000. Far from falling, migration had actually been rising. This volatility highlights a critical point: migration data, like much of the statistics produced by the ONS, is subject to frequent revisions. Initial estimates, though widely reported, can differ dramatically from final figures, as new information emerges. It’s also important to note who these migrants are. Contrary to some public perceptions, the majority are not individuals arriving via small boats but rather people coming legally to study or work. Legal migration has reached historic levels, with more people arriving in the UK than at any other time in British history. Fast forward to today, and the ONS’s latest figures suggest net migration is falling, down to 728,000 in the year to June 2023—a drop of nearly 20% from the previous year. Data from the Home Office, such as visa approvals, supports this trend, indicating a possible slowdown in immigration. Yet caution is warranted. This is not the first time recent data has suggested a decline in net migration, only for subsequent revisions to tell a different story. Six months ago, the ONS claimed a 10% drop in net migration over the previous year. That estimate has since been adjusted to show a negligible decrease of just 1%. The lesson here is that while migration statistics can appear definitive, they are often more uncertain than they seem. Each new release should be taken with a measure of skepticism, particularly when provisional data is used to shape public discourse. In sum, the migration debate is less about whether numbers are rising or falling and more about the reliability of the data itself. For now, it’s safe to say that while net migration may be stabilizing, it remains at levels unprecedented in the UK’s history—a trend with profound implications for the country’s economy and society. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-11-30

In a significant development, Syrian rebel forces have reportedly entered Aleppo, marking the first time opposition fighters have reached the country’s second-largest city since government forces recaptured it in 2016. The rebel advance comes after a surprise offensive launched earlier this week, which saw the capture of several villages and the reactivation of a conflict that had largely been stagnant in recent years. Russians and troops loyal to the Russian-backed Syrian dictator Assad continue to retreat in northern Syria as rebels push into Aleppo, Syria's second largest city. Here, rebels have seized a massive depot of Russian weapons, ammunition, and military equipment. The rebels are advancing so rapidly that OSINT analysts cannot keep up with mapping the changes. The Syrian civil war, which erupted during the Arab Spring in 2011, began as a crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrations against Assad’s regime. It escalated into a full-scale conflict, with the Free Syrian Army emerging as a prominent rebel force against government troops. Over a decade of war has devastated the nation, resulting in more than 300,000 civilian deaths and displacing millions, according to United Nations estimates. As the battle for Aleppo reignites, the fragile balance in Syria faces new challenges, threatening to further entrench the divisions that have plagued the country for years. Based on a report by CNN | X 2024-11-30

President Joe Biden marked his final Thanksgiving as president with a heartfelt message of gratitude and reflection, expressing appreciation for the trust placed in him over the past four years. Sharing his thoughts on the social platform X, Biden wrote, “With hearts full of gratitude: Happy Thanksgiving, America. Jill and I are so grateful for the trust you’ve placed in us these past four years — serving you has been the honor of our lives.” Biden’s Thanksgiving remarks came just days after he participated in the White House’s annual turkey pardoning ceremony, a lighthearted tradition marking the start of the holiday season. On Monday, he granted pardons to two turkeys named Peach and Blossom, who will now reside at the Minnesota Agricultural Interpretive Center as education ambassadors. Adding a touch of humor, Biden noted that the turkeys enjoyed a road trip set to the tune of “Livin’ on a Prayer.” “This event marks the official start of the holiday season here in Washington,” Biden said during the ceremony. “It’s also my last time to speak here as your president during this season and give thanks and gratitude. So let me say to you — it’s been the honor of my life, I am forever thankful.” Spending the Thanksgiving holiday in Nantucket, Massachusetts, Biden is also honoring his tradition of calling members of the military on the day, a gesture reflecting his deep respect for the armed forces. Vice President Kamala Harris joined him in extending holiday gratitude to those in service, according to the White House. The tone of Biden’s message stood in stark contrast to the statement issued by former President Donald Trump, who offered a divisive Thanksgiving post on Truth Social. Trump’s message read, “Happy Thanksgiving to all, including to the Radical Left Lunatics who have worked so hard to destroy our Country, but who have miserably failed, and will always fail... the great people of our Nation just gave a landslide victory to those who want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” As the holiday season progresses, Biden and Trump have publicly agreed to a peaceful transfer of power in January, marking a notable shift from the contentious aftermath of the 2020 election. Earlier this week, Biden signed a memorandum of understanding to ensure his Cabinet transitions seamlessly with their successors. Biden’s Thanksgiving message served as a reminder of his gratitude and belief in the resilience of the American spirit. In his parting words, he reaffirmed his enduring faith in the nation: “We keep going. We keep the faith in America.” Based on a report by The Hill 2024-11-30

An Arizona man, Manuel Tamayo-Torres, has been charged with making threats against President-elect Donald Trump and his family. Authorities allege that Tamayo-Torres posted videos online almost daily, in which he accused Trump and members of his family of kidnapping and sex-trafficking his children. Federal court documents reveal that he also displayed an AR-15-style rifle in some of these videos, further heightening concerns over his intentions. According to the documents, one of Tamayo-Torres's videos was recorded at the Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale, Arizona, the location of a Trump rally on August 23. While the court papers refer to "Individual 1" instead of explicitly naming Trump, the description as a "former president and current president-elect" leaves no ambiguity. In a video posted to Facebook on November 13, Tamayo-Torres is seen holding what appears to be a white AR-15-style rifle with a 30-round magazine. He issues a threat that is both alarming and, at times, difficult to decipher. "You see [Individual 1], this from far away, [Individual 1]... As soon I hear that leave that barrel, I’m already on the foot run after you [Individual 1]," he says, according to the court documents. He also mentions law enforcement personnel, describing them as “little boys and their little badges, off the books,” and claims they cannot chase him effectively because of their equipment. In another video posted on November 21, Tamayo-Torres escalates his rhetoric, stating that Trump’s “whole family is going to die.” He goes on to make disparaging remarks, adding, “You’re Caucasian nothing. You’ll earn nothing. Aryan money, that’s all you have. You’re a low-life scum. I’ll spit in your f-----g face motherf---er, and if they give me a chance, I’m going to f-----g bury you myself." Tamayo-Torres was arrested in Southern California on Monday. He faces one count of making threats against the president-elect and four counts of making false statements during the purchase of a firearm. His attorney has not yet commented on the charges. The court documents also reveal Tamayo-Torres’s history of violent behavior. In 2003, he was convicted of felony assault and served five years in a California state prison. Additionally, in 2022, his ex-wife obtained a protection order against him. This case underscores ongoing concerns about threats of political violence in the United States. It also highlights the role of social media in enabling individuals to disseminate threatening messages, often with alarming reach. Tamayo-Torres's arrest serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by law enforcement in addressing such threats effectively. Based on a report by NBC News 2024-11-30

Keir Starmer is facing mounting scrutiny over efforts to finalize a treaty ceding sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, with accusations that he aims to push the agreement through before the potential return of Donald Trump as U.S. president. The agreement has become a political flashpoint, drawing criticism from Mauritius’s newly elected leadership and allies of Mr. Trump, particularly over its implications for strategic military interests. The deal, crafted by the previous Mauritian administration, has been met with skepticism by Navinchandra Ramgoolam, Mauritius’s new prime minister. During his campaign, Ramgoolam and his supporters labeled the agreement a “sell-out” and even accused the former administration of “high treason,” claiming it was a rushed decision influenced by political desperation. Since his election just two weeks ago, Ramgoolam has publicly voiced “reservations” about the treaty’s terms, further casting doubt on its viability. The treaty also faces resistance in Washington. Marco Rubio, a prominent ally of Mr. Trump and a candidate for the role of U.S. Secretary of State in a future Trump administration, has called the deal a “serious threat” to American national security. He warned it could undermine the strategic importance of the joint U.S.-UK military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the Chagos Islands. Rubio’s comments have amplified concerns about the treaty’s impact on military posture in the Indian Ocean, a region critical to Western interests amid increasing Chinese influence. Labour announced in October that it would relinquish sovereignty over the Chagos Islands, ending more than two centuries of British control. However, with Pravind Jugnauth, the Mauritian leader who negotiated the deal, now ousted from office, the agreement remains unsigned and in political limbo. Labour has argued that the treaty was necessary to secure the continued operation of Diego Garcia after the International Court of Justice deemed the UK’s administration of the islands “unlawful.” Opponents of the deal are optimistic that a Trump presidency could derail its ratification. Nevertheless, Starmer’s government has taken proactive steps to salvage the agreement. Jonathan Powell, Starmer’s incoming national security adviser, has been dispatched to Mauritius and Washington to address concerns and stabilize the negotiations. Despite reports suggesting a mid-January deadline, Downing Street has denied imposing a strict timeline. A spokesperson emphasized, “We haven’t set a timeline to ratify the deal, and we don’t intend to put a timeline on it. Obviously, it’s in everyone’s interests to progress the deal as quickly as possible.” Foreign Secretary David Lammy defended the agreement, dismissing criticism from opposition voices as political maneuvering. “This is incredibly sad,” Lammy said. “I know and I’m sad that there’s been so much politicking about this.” He argued that the treaty represented a “very good deal” and downplayed suggestions that it was on the brink of collapse. However, Conservative MP Sir John Whittingdale reiterated Ramgoolam’s scathing campaign rhetoric, which described the agreement as treasonous and a betrayal of Mauritius’s sovereignty. Lammy responded by highlighting the realities of electioneering: “Both you and I have said things during an election in order to get elected. He did not say that yesterday.” As the Chagos Islands dispute continues, it remains a contentious issue not only between the UK and Mauritius but also among international stakeholders concerned with the geopolitical stability of the Indian Ocean region. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-30

An off topic troll post making unsubstaniated claims has been removed @connda BBC Staff Divided Over Call to Wear Palestinian Flag Colors and Keffiyeh

Doctors in the UK have been urged to stop prescribing traditional blue inhalers for asthma, a long-standing staple of treatment for millions. This recommendation is part of updated NHS guidance, which highlights both the environmental impact of these devices and their limited effectiveness in addressing the root causes of asthma. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has instead encouraged the use of newer “combination inhalers” that provide more comprehensive treatment. Blue inhalers, also known as short-acting beta agonist (SABA) reliever inhalers, have been used for decades to alleviate immediate asthma symptoms. By relaxing the muscles in the airways, they help patients breathe more easily during asthma attacks. However, NICE has emphasized that these inhalers merely provide symptomatic relief without addressing the inflammation that underpins asthma. According to their guidelines, patients over the age of 12 should transition to combination inhalers, which pair a fast-acting reliever with a low dose of corticosteroids to reduce airway inflammation and prevent attacks. A significant driver behind the push to phase out blue inhalers is their environmental impact. These devices rely on a hydrofluorocarbon propellant to deliver medication into the lungs, a substance with a high greenhouse gas effect. Patients are now being educated about the environmental cost of these inhalers through informational leaflets, which compare their carbon footprint to that of a 75-mile car journey. Dry powder inhalers, which do not use gas-based propellants, are being presented as an eco-friendly alternative for environmentally conscious patients. The NHS has previously reported that inhaler emissions account for about 3% of its total carbon footprint, with around 60 million inhalers prescribed annually in England alone. Of these, more than 17 million were blue inhalers prescribed to nearly four million patients last year. NICE has warned that this widespread reliance on blue inhalers may not only exacerbate environmental harm but also increase the risk of severe asthma attacks and even fatalities. Evidence suggests that using three or more blue inhalers annually could indicate poorly controlled asthma and heighten the risk of complications. The new guidelines have been well-received by healthcare professionals. Cath Cooksey, a lead pharmacist with the Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board, explained, “Asthma is primarily an inflammatory airway disease, and although these blue inhalers might give the feeling of relief, they do not treat the underlying cause. Overuse of blue inhalers can indicate a deterioration of asthma and even using three or more a year has been linked to a higher risk of attacks. The takeaway to colleagues in the NHS and patients is clear — blue inhalers do not treat asthma and can mask more severe disease.” Specialist doctors have echoed these concerns, noting that combination inhalers not only reduce inflammation but also result in fewer severe asthma attacks. These devices combine corticosteroids, which address the root cause of asthma, with a fast-acting reliever to ensure immediate symptom relief when needed. NICE’s guidance reflects a shift in asthma management, aiming to improve patient outcomes while reducing environmental harm. This move marks a critical step in modernizing asthma treatment, encouraging more sustainable practices, and promoting a deeper understanding of effective disease management among both patients and healthcare providers. Based on a report by The Times 2024-11-29

The Metropolitan Police have launched a criminal investigation into individuals accused of enabling Mohamed Al Fayed in carrying out decades of sexual abuse, as 90 additional victims have recently come forward. Scotland Yard has identified more than five suspects alleged to have assisted the late Harrods owner in what detectives described as “horrendous abuse.” The investigation marks a significant escalation following the emergence of allegations from a total of 111 victims, the youngest reportedly just 13 years old. Before Al Fayed’s death in 2023 at the age of 94, police had been aware of 21 allegations against him between 2005 and 2023, including four accusations of rape, 16 of sexual assault, and one related to trafficking. Despite being arrested in 2013 over a rape claim, Al Fayed was never charged. The case gained renewed attention in September after the BBC aired an investigation into the Egyptian businessman’s alleged predatory behavior. The broadcast prompted a surge of allegations, with 150 individuals coming forward to provide information, including 90 new victims. Detectives are now examining claims of rape, sexual assault, and trafficking that span nearly four decades, from 1977 to 2014. Scotland Yard is conducting an internal review of how it handled allegations against Al Fayed during his lifetime. Questions have arisen about potential corruption within the police force, with reports suggesting officers may have accepted bribes to ignore claims of abuse, particularly from Harrods employees. All previous investigations into Al Fayed are being re-evaluated as part of the ongoing inquiry. In a statement, the Metropolitan Police revealed the scale of the investigation, noting that detectives have already examined 50,000 pages of evidence. The force admitted shortcomings in supporting victims in the past, with a spokesperson saying, “We know that contact with and support for some victims at the time could have been improved. Only after completing this comprehensive review will we fully understand what could have been done differently.” The Crown Prosecution Service had been approached five times between 2005 and 2023 regarding Al Fayed, yet no charges were ever filed. Now, the investigation is not only focused on Al Fayed’s alleged crimes but also on those suspected of facilitating his abuse. Detective Chief Superintendent James Clayman stated that the inquiry aims to determine the roles individuals played in enabling Al Fayed’s offending and the opportunities they may have had to protect victims. Appealing directly to victims, Clayman said, “I know you may have faced years of silence or disbelief, but you are not alone. We are here, ready to support you and ensure your voice is heard.” This comprehensive investigation reflects Scotland Yard’s commitment to addressing past failures and seeking justice for victims. The inquiry underscores the importance of accountability, not just for the accused but also for any individuals who may have played a part in perpetuating the abuse. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-29

President-elect Donald Trump launched a scathing critique of *The New York Times* early Tuesday, accusing the publication of grossly misrepresenting him in its reporting and demanding an apology. Trump expressed his grievances in a series of posts on Truth Social, labeling the outlet’s coverage as “so wrong” and accusing it of intentionally trying to tarnish his reputation. “Will the failing New York Times apologize to its readers for getting years of ‘Trump’ coverage so wrong?” he wrote. Trump alleged that the publication knowingly publishes false information. “They write such phony ‘junk,’ knowing full well how incorrect it is, only meaning to demean.” Among his specific grievances, Trump targeted Maggie Haberman, a national political correspondent for the paper known for her extensive coverage of Trump dating back to his career as a New York real estate magnate. “A third rate writer and fourth rate intellect, writes story after story, always terrible, and yet I almost never speak to her,” Trump said of Haberman, who co-authored a recent *Times* piece that seemed to ignite his ire. The article in question, published late Monday, detailed an internal investigation conducted by Trump’s transition team. The investigation reportedly examined allegations that top aide Boris Epshteyn solicited payments from candidates for high-ranking Cabinet positions to gain favor with Trump. The claims, which Epshteyn has denied, drew significant attention and added fuel to Trump’s ongoing feud with the press. Trump’s indignation extended beyond Haberman to *The New York Times* as a whole, criticizing what he described as a disregard for accuracy. “They do no fact checking, because facts don’t matter to them,” Trump asserted, emphasizing what he sees as a consistent bias against him in the paper’s reporting. The president-elect also pointed to his historic 2016 election victory as evidence of the disconnect between *The New York Times* and the American public. “I don’t believe I’ve had a legitimately good story in the NYT for years, AND YET I WON, IN RECORD FASHION, THE MOST CONSEQUENTIAL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN DECADES,” he declared, adding, “WHERE IS THE APOLOGY?” Trump’s fiery comments come amid ongoing tension between his administration and major media outlets, particularly those he perceives as hostile. This latest exchange highlights the sharp divisions between Trump and the press as he prepares to assume the presidency. Based on a report by The Hill 2024-11-29

In a high-profile counter-terrorism operation in London, seven individuals have been arrested over alleged connections to the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), a group banned in the UK, US, and Turkey as a terrorist organization. The arrests were carried out by the Metropolitan Police early on Wednesday, with two women, aged 59 and 31, and four men, aged 27, 62, 56, and 23, detained at separate addresses. A seventh suspect, a 31-year-old man, was apprehended later in the day in west London. All seven are currently in custody under the Terrorism Act. The operation has drawn sharp criticism from Kurdish community representatives. Ishak Milani, of the Kurdish People’s Assembly in the UK, described the police action as "unjust and heavy-handed." He stated, “This aggressive act is not only an attack on our people but also an affront to the principles of democracy, justice, and human rights that the UK claims to uphold.” The Metropolitan Police defended their actions, asserting that the arrests were part of a "targeted operation" aimed at those suspected of terrorist activities linked to the PKK. Acting Commander Helen Flanagan acknowledged the concerns raised within the Kurdish community, stating, “We understand these arrests have caused some concern amongst certain local communities – particularly those in the Kurdish community.” Commander Flanagan emphasized the gravity of the allegations, describing them as "very serious" and a result of a "significant investigation." She added, “This investigation and activity is about protecting all of our communities, but particularly those in our Turkish and Kurdish communities.” The Met has encouraged anyone who believes they have been affected or targeted by individuals connected to the PKK to come forward. To address community concerns, officers plan to meet with local leaders and will increase their presence in the area over the coming days. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-29

The release of Abdalraouf Abdallah, a convicted terrorist with ties to the radicalization of Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi, has sparked widespread outrage and calls for intervention from the Justice Secretary. Abdallah, a childhood friend of Abedi, was freed from HMP Full Sutton in East Yorkshire this week after serving his full sentence, despite being deemed a continuing danger to the public. Abdallah's release comes just two months after the Parole Board rejected an early release plea, citing assessments from his prison officer, psychologist, and probation officer, all of whom agreed he posed a "high risk of serious harm to the public." Reports stated that Abdallah remained engaged with extremist ideologies and retained an intent to commit terrorist-related offenses. Despite these concerns, his automatic release was mandated as his sentence had expired. Abdallah, now 31, had been jailed for facilitating travel to Syria for individuals seeking to join the Islamic State group. In 2021, he was recalled to prison after breaching license conditions, underscoring the risks associated with his release. His potential to influence and radicalize others remained a central issue, with reports highlighting that he could exploit any accommodation or contacts post-release to further extremism. The release has prompted a fierce backlash, with Shadow Secretary of State for Justice Robert Jenrick leading calls for action. In a statement on X (formerly Twitter), Jenrick said: “This is the terrorist, Abdalraouf Abdallah. He was released on Tuesday. His prison officer, psychologist, and parole officer said he was ‘high risk,’ ‘engaging with extremism,’ and intended to ‘commit terrorist-related offending.’ The Justice Secretary must intervene.” According to documents from his parole hearing, Abdallah exhibited no significant change in his extremist mindset, and the proposed measures for managing his release were criticized as insufficiently robust. His continued engagement with extremism raised alarm among officials, who concluded that public safety could not be guaranteed under current release plans. The case has reignited debates about the adequacy of the UK’s system for managing the release of dangerous offenders. Critics argue that the automatic release mechanism, which is triggered when sentences expire, fails to account for the ongoing risks posed by individuals like Abdallah. Calls for reform have intensified as public and political figures question whether the existing legal framework adequately prioritizes public safety. The Justice Secretary is now under pressure to take urgent action. Jenrick and others have emphasized the gravity of the threat Abdallah poses, particularly given his previous role in radicalizing Abedi, whose attack on the Manchester Arena in 2017 claimed 22 lives and left scores injured. The case serves as a stark reminder of the challenges in balancing legal obligations with the imperative to protect the public from individuals who, even after serving their sentences, remain committed to dangerous ideologies. Whether Abdallah’s release will prompt changes to the system remains to be seen, but the anger surrounding the decision underscores the need for a comprehensive review of policies governing the release of high-risk offenders. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-29

Former European Commission President José Manuel Barroso has revealed striking insights into Vladimir Putin’s view of Ukraine, describing the Russian leader’s desire to undermine its sovereignty. In an exclusive interview with Euronews, Barroso recounted his interactions with Putin during his decade-long tenure from 2004 to 2014. Over the course of 25 meetings, Putin made it clear that he did not see Ukraine as an independent entity. Barroso recalled that Putin once referred to Ukraine as “an artificial country created by the CIA and by the European Commission.” According to Barroso, the Russian president’s goal was to prevent Ukraine from achieving full independence. Instead, Putin envisioned Ukraine as a satellite state firmly under Moscow’s influence, much like Belarus. “I know because I spoke with him about this,” Barroso explained. “He does not want Ukraine to exist, or if it exists, to be a kind of Belarus without any independence in foreign policy or in defense terms—a vassal state. This is his goal.” Barroso emphasized his unique perspective, having met Putin more frequently than any other non-European leader during his presidency. “Putin is the leader outside Europe that I met the most during my ten years in office. I met him 25 times. I know what he feels. I know,” Barroso said. He further noted that Putin’s ambitions extended beyond territorial gains, asserting, “Putin does not want to come to the Russian people and say, okay, we have gained some more territory, a little bit of Donbass, a little bit of Crimea now. The goal of Putin was to avoid Ukraine being a country.” During Barroso’s time in office, several key events marked Russia’s increasingly aggressive posture. These included the annexation of Crimea, the conflict in Georgia, and high-profile assassinations linked to the Kremlin, such as journalist Anna Politkovskaya and former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko. Reflecting on the annexation of Crimea, Barroso noted that many European governments viewed it as a “special case.” He added, “That’s why today, honestly, nobody believes that Ukraine is going to get back Crimea. That’s the reality.” Barroso also shed light on the European Union’s response to Russian aggression during his tenure. While there was awareness of Putin’s intentions, EU member states hesitated to impose strong sanctions due to economic concerns. “The problem was which kind of sanctions because then they could not agree, and they asked the commission to design the sanctions,” Barroso explained. Each country sought exceptions for specific industries, ranging from farming and energy to banking and even diamonds. “I don’t think at that moment it was possible to conceive a much stronger position because, in fact, the governments were not ready for it,” he admitted. Despite past hesitations, Barroso is unequivocal about Europe’s responsibility to support Ukraine in its current struggle against Russia. He argued that Europe must ensure Ukraine’s victory regardless of any potential policy shifts in the United States. “Whatever happens with our American friends, we should support Ukraine because if not, it’s not only going to be a tragedy for Ukraine. It’s a very important country, but a tragedy for Europe,” Barroso said. He warned that failing to act decisively would embolden movements opposed to democracy, international law, and European values. Based on a report by Euro News 2024-11-29

The U.K.’s Labour government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, is navigating a delicate balancing act between ambitious climate policies and the pressing need for economic growth. As political pressures mount and the realities of governance take hold, Labour is signaling its willingness to prioritize economic stability and electoral viability over stringent green targets. Central to this shift is the government’s stance on electric vehicle (EV) sales, a cornerstone of its climate strategy. Intense lobbying from the automotive industry has led to calls for adjustments to rules designed to accelerate the transition to zero-emission vehicles. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) recently warned that the pace of change is having "negative effects" on the car market and the U.K.’s appeal to investors. Labour, keen to reverse the country’s stagnant economic growth, appears to be listening closely. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds emphasized this pragmatic approach in recent parliamentary discussions. "I’ve got no interest in the country hitting its climate targets by shutting down jobs and industry," he stated, making clear that Labour’s green ambitions will not come at the expense of employment or economic recovery. While the overarching goal of banning new petrol and diesel car sales by 2030 remains intact, Reynolds assured industry leaders that consultations on the Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate—annual EV sales quotas accompanied by steep fines for noncompliance—will be fast-tracked. Although details of the consultation remain unclear, Reynolds and Transport Secretary Louise Haigh have sought to reassure car manufacturers. "We’ve heard you loud and clear on the need for support to make this transition a success," Reynolds said, signaling potential changes to ease industry concerns. Such moves, however, have sparked criticism. Colin Walker, head of transport at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), warned that diluting the ZEV mandate could undermine efforts to cut CO2 emissions in the transport sector. "The green agenda and the growth agenda are not mutually exclusive," Walker argued, urging the government to view climate action as an opportunity rather than a constraint. Labour leaders often echo this sentiment, with Starmer portraying climate action as a driver of economic innovation and job creation. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has eased public investment rules to channel funds into energy infrastructure, underscoring the party’s belief in the economic potential of the green transition. However, Starmer’s decision earlier this year to drop Labour’s £28 billion annual green investment pledge—a key promise during his time as opposition leader—revealed a willingness to adjust priorities under political and financial pressures. The tension between environmental commitments and growth ambitions extends beyond EV policies. Labour’s promise to build 1.5 million new homes during this parliamentary term, a cornerstone of its economic strategy, has sparked debates over the environmental consequences of large-scale construction. This clash also highlights divisions within the broader green movement, with renewable energy advocates sometimes at odds with conservationists concerned about the impact of wind turbines and pylons on wildlife and habitats. Based on a report by Politico 2024-11-29

Keir Starmer’s leadership of the Labour Party has faced significant challenges during its initial months, as an analysis of council election results reveals a sharp decline in the party’s performance. Since July 4, Labour candidates have secured only 53 of the 150 contested local authority seats, a steep drop from the 75 previously held. In contrast, the Conservative Party has improved its standing, increasing its seat count by 21 to 44. Reform UK, a relative newcomer to council elections, has also made gains, securing five seats. Labour's share of the vote has fallen markedly, dropping from 32.6% before the general election to 24.5%, according to data from ElectionMapsUK. Meanwhile, the Conservatives experienced a modest increase in their vote share, rising from 23.2% to 24.1%. Other parties have also benefited from Labour’s decline, with the Liberal Democrats climbing by 3.4 percentage points to 18% and the Green Party improving to 10%. Reform UK, which previously had limited presence in local contests, captured 6.7% of the vote. This decline follows what has been described as a tumultuous first five months for Starmer, despite his landslide victory in the general election. That victory, however, came with one of the lowest winning vote shares in history, setting a challenging backdrop for his leadership. Much of the backlash has centered around economic policies introduced under Labour's Chancellor Rachel Reeves. A controversial £40 billion tax increase, unveiled in her first Budget, has drawn criticism from various groups. Farmers have voiced frustration over inheritance tax changes, while pensioners have expressed anger at the removal of winter fuel allowances. Adding to Labour’s troubles is growing public discontent, with a parliamentary petition calling for a new general election nearing 2.8 million signatures. The local election results underscore the difficulties Starmer faces in maintaining public support while managing economic pressures and addressing voter concerns. With dissatisfaction rising, Labour must navigate a politically volatile landscape to regain its footing. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-29

President-elect Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that Mexico's newly inaugurated president, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, has committed to halting migration through her country into the United States. Trump described the conversation as highly productive, emphasizing its significance for addressing issues related to migration and illegal drug trafficking. “Just had a wonderful conversation with the new President of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo,” Trump shared on Truth Social. “She has agreed to stop Migration through Mexico, and into the United States, effectively closing our Southern Border.” The discussion extended beyond migration, with Trump highlighting their dialogue on combating the flow of illegal drugs across the U.S.-Mexico border. “We also talked about what can be done to stop the massive drug inflow into the United States, and also, U.S. consumption of these drugs,” he wrote, concluding, “It was a very productive conversation!” Sheinbaum Pardo, 62, made history as Mexico’s first female president when she took office in October. A scientist and former mayor of Mexico City, she responded to Trump’s remarks with her own comments on social media. On X, formerly known as Twitter, she confirmed their collaborative efforts on migration and security. “I had an excellent conversation with President Donald Trump,” Sheinbaum Pardo wrote. “We discussed Mexico’s strategy on the migration phenomenon and I shared that caravans are not arriving at the northern border because they are being taken care of in Mexico.” She further detailed plans to strengthen security collaboration while respecting national sovereignty and elaborated on efforts to address drug consumption, particularly fentanyl, within Mexico. “We also discussed strengthening collaboration on security issues within the framework of our sovereignty and the campaign we are carrying out in the country to prevent the consumption of fentanyl,” she added. Trump has been vocal about leveraging tariffs as a means to pressure Mexico and other countries on issues like illegal immigration and drug smuggling. Earlier this week, he announced plans to impose a 25% tariff on Mexican imports if significant action wasn’t taken. Canada and China were also named in Trump’s broader tariff strategy, with proposed rates of 25% and 10%, respectively. Following his conversation with Sheinbaum Pardo, Trump expressed confidence in the immediate impact of Mexico’s commitment. “Mexico will stop people from going to our Southern Border, effective immediately,” he declared in a separate Truth Social post. “THIS WILL GO A LONG WAY TOWARD STOPPING THE ILLEGAL INVASION OF THE USA. Thank you!!!” The exchange marks a significant step in addressing key issues surrounding U.S.-Mexico relations, with both leaders signaling their readiness to collaborate on pressing challenges. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-29

A group of Labour MPs is urging a government-appointed commission to ensure the paintings displayed in Parliament reflect the diversity of modern Britain. The appeal comes as part of a broader set of proposals aimed at modernizing the institution and fostering a more inclusive environment. The group of eight backbench MPs, including former shadow ministers Stella Creasy and Dr. Rosena Allin-Khan, as well as Beccy Cooper, the newly elected MP for Worthing West, plans to present their recommendations to the Commons Modernisation Committee. This new panel, comprising 14 MPs, has been established to explore reforms to parliamentary procedures. Speaking to *PoliticsHome*, Beccy Cooper highlighted the evolving nature of Westminster. "Westminster is a changing place, with more women MPs, people from ethnic minorities, and people with disabilities," she stated. While emphasizing the privilege of working in Westminster, Cooper added that she and her colleagues are keen to propose changes to enhance its operation and inclusivity. This push for reform follows Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s controversial decision to replace several historic portraits in Downing Street, a move that has drawn criticism. Under previous administrations, portraits of Elizabeth I, Sir Walter Raleigh, and Margaret Thatcher were prominently displayed. These have now been substituted with landscape artwork, reflecting Starmer’s preference for less politically charged decor. The shift in artistic focus has extended beyond Downing Street. Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently replaced a portrait of Nigel Lawson, a prominent Conservative chancellor under Thatcher, with an image of Ellen Wilkinson. Wilkinson, a former Labour education minister and a founding member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, symbolizes Labour’s historical roots and progressive ideals. In addition to advocating for diverse artwork, the Labour MPs are reportedly considering other recommendations. These include providing parliamentary staff with greater access to green spaces and introducing regular, guaranteed breaks to improve well-being within Westminster. However, the proposals have not been universally well-received. Critics argue that such initiatives fail to address pressing national concerns. Elliot Keck, head of campaigns at the TaxPayers’ Alliance, expressed his dismay, saying, "Dear me. The quality of our current crop of politicians. How about these MPs spend their time fixing the backlog of driving tests or any of the other dozens of issues they were elected by their constituents to solve?" Steven Barrett, a commercial barrister and commentator, was similarly scathing. "We appear to have elected a bunch of controlling, authoritarian loons," he remarked, questioning the priorities of the MPs involved. The Commons Modernisation Committee is open to receiving feedback on potential reforms until just before Christmas, providing MPs and members of the parliamentary community with an opportunity to shape the future of Westminster. While the debate over parliamentary paintings may seem symbolic to some, it reflects broader discussions about representation and inclusivity in British political life. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-29

Berlin's police chief, Barbara Slowik, has issued a stark warning for Jews and LGBTQ+ individuals in the German capital, advising them to exercise caution in areas with large Arab populations due to a climate of hostility and potential danger. "There are areas of the city, we need to be perfectly honest here, where I would advise people who wear a kippah or are openly gay to be more careful," Slowik stated. She pointed to certain neighborhoods, particularly those with a significant Arab presence, as zones where such caution is warranted. "There are certain neighbourhoods where the majority of people of Arab origin live, who also have sympathies for terrorist groups," she said, adding that attitudes in these areas can be "openly hostile towards Jews." Germany has witnessed a sharp increase in anti-Semitic incidents, particularly since the escalation of violence in Gaza. Reports of anti-Semitic acts have doubled in 2023 compared to prior years. According to Slowik, Berlin police have launched over 6,000 investigations into anti-Semitism-related cases since October 7, most of which involve hate speech or graffiti. However, some incidents have been far more violent. A football fan was attacked for wearing a scarf emblazoned with the Star of David. A synagogue was targeted with a petrol bomb shortly after the Hamas attacks on October 7 in southern Israel. Additionally, a couple was assaulted in a fast-food restaurant for speaking Hebrew. The October 7 massacre also saw an unsettling response in the Berlin district of Neukölln, where men were observed handing out sweets to celebrate the attacks. This incident underscored broader concerns about the impact of recent waves of migration on Jewish safety in Germany. Neukölln, known for its vibrant LGBT nightlife, has the city's highest Arab population. While Jewish and LGBTQ+ communities have coexisted in the district for years, tensions remain. Physical assaults on gay couples have occurred in the area, highlighting ongoing challenges in ensuring safety and acceptance for all. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-29

A baiting troll post has been removed, if a member is not reading the OP and ignoring what it says then continuing to argue points that it has already confirmed, that is trolling @Chomper Higgot

Donald Trump’s cabinet nominees and members of his White House team have become the targets of bomb threats and swatting incidents. The FBI confirmed it is investigating multiple cases involving false emergency calls intended to elicit a heavy police response at the homes of Trump’s appointees. These threats, described by law enforcement as numerous and coordinated, have raised significant concerns about the safety of public officials and their families. The threats were directed at nominees for key roles, including the Departments of Housing, Agriculture, and Labor, as well as Trump’s pick for U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. The incidents, which occurred late Tuesday and early Wednesday, are under active investigation by police. Karoline Leavitt, a spokesperson for Trump’s transition team, condemned the attacks, calling them “violent, un-American threats to their lives and those who live with them.” She confirmed law enforcement acted swiftly to protect those targeted and pledged the team’s resilience. “With President Trump as our example, dangerous acts of intimidation and violence will not deter us,” she stated. While neither Leavitt nor the FBI disclosed the names of all the targets, some individuals have come forward to confirm they were affected. Elise Stefanik, Trump’s nominee for U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, revealed her family home was threatened as she traveled with her husband and three-year-old son from Washington, D.C., to New York for Thanksgiving. Meanwhile, New York police identified Howard Lutnick, Trump’s nominee for Commerce Secretary, as another target. Reports indicate that none of the individuals targeted this week were under the protection of the U.S. Secret Service. Lee Zeldin, nominated to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, disclosed that a pipe bomb threat with a “pro-Palestinian themed message” was sent to his home. "My family and I were not home at the time and are safe," Zeldin stated, expressing gratitude for the quick actions of local law enforcement. Similarly, Brooke Rollins, Trump’s choice for the Department of Agriculture, acknowledged a threat against her family in Fort Worth, Texas. “We were unharmed and quickly returned home,” she wrote in a social media post, praising the police for their swift response. Other nominees, including Scott Turner for the Department of Housing and Lori Chavez-Deremer for Labor Secretary, also shared their experiences of being targeted. Both vowed that such threats would not hinder their commitments. Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz, who recently withdrew from consideration for Attorney General, was among the additional individuals affected. A bomb threat in Niceville, Florida, prompted a thorough search of his residence, but no devices were found. Fox News reported that John Ratcliffe, Trump’s nominee for CIA Director, and Pete Hegseth, his pick for Defense Secretary, also received threats. These incidents follow a troubling trend of hoax attacks against high-profile political figures. Last year, swatting incidents over Christmas targeted numerous politicians, predominantly Republicans, but some Democrats as well. President Joe Biden has been briefed on the situation, with the White House affirming its communication with federal law enforcement and Trump’s transition team. U.S. Capitol Police, in coordination with federal agencies, emphasized the need for discretion to reduce the risk of copycat threats. These events underscore the dangers public officials face in a polarized political climate, highlighting the urgency of addressing threats against those serving in government. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-28

Troll post removed from a usual suspect @thaibeachlovers

A couple of troll posts removed, one was a blatant Israeli hate speech post @thaibeachlovers