Social Media

The escalating frustrations among UK farmers over proposed inheritance tax reforms have led to a call for protests in London this week. Unlike their French counterparts, who are known for their militant demonstrations, British farmers are planning peaceful marches and discussions—at least for now. However, organizers warn that if the government refuses to reconsider its controversial tax plans, the protests could take a more confrontational turn. The proposed policy, set to take effect in April 2026, imposes a 20% inheritance tax on farming assets valued at over £1 million, with allowances raising the threshold to £3 million. For many family-run farms, this represents a significant financial burden. Farmers like Clive Bailye, who runs The Farming Forum website, say this “impossible tax” forces families to sell off their land to meet the tax bill. Bailye estimates he would owe £450,000 for his parents’ farm, an increase of £60,000 from the current rate. “The only way I could possibly pay that is by selling the farm,” he said, emphasizing the emotional and economic toll such policies impose on family farms. Tuesday’s protests will consist of two distinct actions: a union-led effort where nearly 2,000 farmers are set to meet MPs across Westminster, and a family-oriented march through London’s streets. Organizers have stressed the importance of maintaining a respectful and peaceful atmosphere, asking participants to “leave no mark” other than food bank donations. Bailye described the march as a “family thing,” featuring children pedaling mini-tractors at the forefront. However, tensions are simmering beneath the surface. Bailye expressed concern that more militant farmers might adopt tactics akin to those seen in France, where farmers recently blocked motorways and dumped manure to express their dissatisfaction with government policies. “There are other groups of farmers who, for want of a better word, want to get more French,” he said, adding that such actions could tarnish the farming industry’s reputation. Police have already issued warnings against disruptive protests, making it clear that using tractors to block roads would result in arrests. Oliver Harrison, an arable farmer and one of the march’s organizers, noted that some farmers are eager to take such measures. However, he has urged protesters to focus on communicating their plight. “We don’t want to be in headlines because farmers are rioting,” Harrison said. “We want to be in the headlines explaining that we feed people and [the tax increase] is taking away that ability.” National Farmers Union (NFU) President Tom Bradshaw echoed these sentiments, urging farmers to bring the values of “trust, respect, and family” to London. He described the day as a chance for rural communities to showcase their concerns without disrupting the capital. Bradshaw criticized the government for underestimating the human impact of these reforms, particularly on elderly farmers who cannot benefit from seven-year gifting rules. “If you’re in the twilight years and you don’t expect to live for seven years, that creates a really, really difficult position,” he said. Only farms worth more than £1 million will be subject to the new inheritance tax rate. That might sound like a lot, but according to Bailye, £1 million won’t get you very far in modern farming. “The working capital involved in running a viable farm is £5-10 million. A tractor is £250,000 now. A combine harvester is £500,000. A milking parlour £1 million, grain stores £500,000. A farm house might be £500,000, or if you’re in the Cotswolds it could be worth a couple of million. “On paper, [some farmers] are extremely wealthy people because they’ve got this £10 million asset. But for many farms the return on capital is 0.5 per cent or less. If you walked into Dragon’s Den with a business idea saying ‘I’d like you to invest £10 million and I’ll give you 0.5 per cent return’, they’d laugh you out the door. So as a way to make money it doesn’t make sense. It’s not about that, it’s about a lifestyle.” Based on a report by the Times & Sunday Times 2024-11-19

Last week, The Guardian, a cornerstone of left-leaning media, announced its departure from Twitter, or X as it’s now known, marking a symbolic moment in the shifting dynamics of social media. “The US presidential election campaign served only to underline what we have considered for too long,” the paper declared, “that X is a toxic media platform and that its owner, Elon Musk, has been able to use its influence to shape political discourse.” The Guardian's withdrawal from Twitter is just the latest chapter in what has been a turbulent time for the publication. From counseling its staff after Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory to grappling with a global political shift to the right, the paper has found itself navigating a world increasingly at odds with its ideological leanings. The same UK government The Guardian once cheered into power is now implementing policies that it strongly opposes, from changes in education to agricultural reforms. The platform itself has changed dramatically since Elon Musk took over. Where leftist voices once dominated, the platform now leans more conservative, a transformation that hasn’t gone unnoticed. The departure of The Guardian—and even the Clifton Suspension Bridge’s Twitter account—underscores how Musk’s ownership has reshaped the platform’s character. The bridge’s social media team announced its own exit, humorously leaving users to ponder how such a decision might have rattled Musk himself. For some, Twitter has always been a microcosm of modern social dynamics, a space where vanity and debate intertwine. It’s a digital stage for self-expression, righteous indignation, and at times, outright vitriol. Critics argue that social media, Twitter included, has done little to enhance public discourse and much to foster division, bullying, and performative outrage. The Guardian's decision raises questions about where its audience and other left-leaning individuals will turn. Platforms like Facebook and Instagram still host The Guardian’s content, but they, too, come with their own controversies and limitations. Yet the issue remains: without a common battleground like Twitter, can those on the left find a new venue to engage their ideological adversaries? Meanwhile, conservatives and right-leaning voices seem content to remain on Twitter, where they enjoy what they perceive as newfound freedom from relentless self-righteous critiques. With their critics leaving en masse, the dynamics of the platform may further shift, creating a space more homogeneous in thought and tone. For now, the question lingers: where will these “poor lambs” go to bleat? Will they find a new haven where they can engage in the debates they once relished on Twitter, or will their absence leave them out of the fray entirely? One thing is certain—social media’s influence on political discourse is far from over, and its evolution continues to mirror the changing tides of society itself. Based on a report by The Daily Telegraph 2024-11-19

Kanye West, the rapper and producer also known as Ye, has been accused of making antisemitic remarks about his ex-wife Kim Kardashian in a lawsuit filed Thursday. The complaint alleges that West told an employee that Kardashian had “Jewish masters,” among other controversial statements. The plaintiff, Murphy Aficionado, began working as a project manager for West in October 2022. His role involved overseeing various construction projects. According to the lawsuit, Aficionado was not paid for his work during the first five months of his employment and was subjected to a hostile work environment. The suit claims West frequently delivered “racist lectures” and indulged in antisemitic conspiracy theories. Aficionado specifically alleges that West stated, “The Jews are out to get me. They froze my bank account. The Jews got Kim and my kids… The Jews convinced Kim. She has Jewish masters.” These comments, according to the suit, were part of a pattern of discriminatory and offensive behavior. The lawsuit also details other troubling incidents during Aficionado’s tenure. On two separate occasions, West allegedly left Aficionado waiting while he loudly engaged in sexual activity in a nearby room. Aficionado’s employment ended in July 2023 when he was informed that Donda Academy, a private school founded by West, would be shutting down. This lawsuit is one of several filed against West by former employees this year. In June, Lauren Pisciotta, a former assistant, accused him of sexual harassment and wrongful termination. Pisciotta later amended her lawsuit in October, alleging that West had drugged and sexually assaulted her without her consent. Additionally, a former “director of intelligence” employed by West sued him in October, claiming that he was tasked with investigating Kardashian and tracking West’s wife, Bianca Censori, while she was on vacation. These lawsuits paint a troubling picture of West’s alleged behavior, with accusations ranging from exploitation and harassment to antisemitic and offensive remarks. As legal proceedings continue, the claims against the rapper add to the controversies that have surrounded him in recent years. Based on a report by Variety 2024-11-19

Muslim Americans who supported Donald Trump in protest against the Biden administration’s policies on the Israel-Gaza conflict have expressed deep disappointment in his pro-Israel cabinet selections. Trump’s decisions to nominate key officials known for their staunch support of Israel have left many feeling betrayed, especially given the promises of peace and stability that had drawn their votes. “We are very disappointed,” said Rexhinaldo Nazarko, executive director of the American Muslim Engagement and Empowerment Network (AMEEN). “It seems like this administration has been packed entirely with neoconservatives and extremely pro-Israel, pro-war people, which is a failure on the side of President Trump, to the pro-peace and anti-war movement.” Key appointments include Senator Marco Rubio, who was chosen as Secretary of State. Rubio, a vocal supporter of Israel, recently rejected calls for a ceasefire in Gaza, asserting that Israel should destroy “every element” of Hamas. Trump also selected former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee as Ambassador to Israel. Huckabee, a conservative who has consistently backed Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, has dismissed the viability of a two-state solution, calling it “unworkable.” Another controversial pick is Representative Elise Stefanik, nominated as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Stefanik has criticized the UN as a “cesspool of antisemitism” for its condemnation of civilian deaths in Gaza. These appointments signal a clear alignment with pro-Israel policies, a stark contrast to the expectations of many Muslim voters who supported Trump in hopes of achieving peace in the Middle East. Rabiul Chowdhury, a Philadelphia investor and co-founder of Muslims for Trump, said the Muslim vote had been pivotal in Trump’s victories in swing states like Michigan. “Trump won because of us, and we’re not happy with his secretary of state pick and others,” Chowdhury said. Others feel even more disillusioned. Hassan Abdel Salam, co-founder of the Abandon Harris campaign, described Trump’s staffing as more extreme than anticipated. “It’s like he’s going on Zionist overdrive,” he said. “We were always extremely skeptical...but it does look like our community has been played.” Many Trump allies who initially engaged with Muslim and Arab American communities, such as Richard Grenell and Massad Boulos, had promised that Trump would be a president committed to peace. Grenell, a former acting director of national intelligence, was even touted as a possible Secretary of State during campaign outreach efforts. However, his absence from a key role in the administration has only deepened skepticism. Despite the cabinet appointments, some Trump supporters remain hopeful. Bill Bazzi, mayor of Dearborn Heights, Michigan, who endorsed Trump, stated, “I still believe he will work to end the war, despite the cabinet appointments.” Rola Makki, vice chair for outreach of the Michigan Republican Party, echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that the ultimate outcome of Trump’s policies would matter most. “What people need to realize is that there are 50,000 dead Palestinians and 3,000 dead Lebanese, and that’s happened during the current administration,” she said. While Trump’s campaign did not respond to requests for comment, the discontent among his Muslim supporters underscores the growing tensions between promises made during his campaign and the reality of his policy choices. Many in the Muslim and Arab American communities feel the need to continue advocating for peace while grappling with the sense of betrayal. As Nazarko pointed out, “At least we’re on the map.” Based on a report by Reuters 2024-11-19

As Donald Trump prepares to assume the presidency once more, the Justice Department (DOJ) and the FBI are bracing for an era of political retribution. Legal experts and insiders believe that Trump’s nomination of staunch ally Matt Gaetz as attorney general signals a determined effort to consolidate control over the DOJ and pursue investigations against his perceived adversaries. Multiple current and former DOJ and FBI officials, fearing criminal investigations, have begun consulting lawyers, a move reflecting their heightened concerns. "Everything we did was aboveboard," stated a former senior FBI official anonymously, though they expect to be targeted regardless. They anticipate costly legal battles and potential congressional investigations as part of a broader strategy by Trump loyalists. Gaetz’s selection has amplified these fears. The former congressman, who faced but was not charged in a federal sex trafficking investigation, is seen by many as an enforcer of Trump’s agenda. A former DOJ official remarked, “He needs to be able to control the department, which he can do through a loyal AG beholden to him.” They added that Gaetz’s own vulnerabilities ensure his loyalty to Trump, who retains the power to protect him through potential pardons. The fear among DOJ and FBI officials stems from Trump’s consistent portrayal of their prior investigations as politically motivated. His spokesperson, Steven Cheung, dismissed all criminal charges against Trump as partisan attacks, calling for their dismissal. Legal experts view the looming investigations into Justice Department officials as a method to intimidate those who dare to scrutinize Trump’s actions. Stephen Gillers, an ethics professor at New York University, said, “Trump aims to neutralize sources of power that may impede him. That includes the law and legal institutions. He will tolerate no interference when the department’s decisions will benefit Trump and his allies or when its power can be deployed to retaliate against his enemies.” Inside the DOJ, morale has plummeted. Following Trump’s unexpected election victory, officials expressed shock and dismay, some even weeping at the prospect of his return to power. Attorney General Merrick Garland had sought to restore nonpartisan norms within the DOJ, but Trump's victory dashed those efforts. Despite Trump’s claims of corruption within the DOJ, officials maintain that their investigations, including federal charges related to Trump’s handling of classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election, were conducted properly. “There’s no crime,” said one law enforcement official, puzzled by the allegations against them. However, conservative lawyer Mike Davis and others argue that DOJ officials, including special counsel Jack Smith, could be prosecuted under laws like “conspiracy against rights.” Critics dismiss such theories as baseless. Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, stated, “I think that’s absurd. I don’t see any legitimate charge that can be brought against Smith.” Legal experts warn, though, that investigations can unearth unrelated minor infractions. A special prosecutor, for instance, might find violations involving taxes or other offenses during broader probes. This tactic was evident during past investigations: Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, faced convictions unrelated to the original Russia inquiry, while Special Counsel John Durham’s examination of the 2016 election netted only a single guilty plea for an unrelated matter. For those targeted, the financial toll can be devastating. Many DOJ and FBI officials now face the prospect of exorbitant legal fees, adding to the personal and professional costs of becoming entangled in politically motivated investigations. Gillers noted that Trump’s nomination of Gaetz marks only the beginning of this strategy. “Elevating Gaetz is in part payback for Jack Smith’s two indictments,” he said. “The Justice Department is Trump’s white whale, and like Captain Ahab, Trump is determined to get even.” As the DOJ prepares for a turbulent future, the implications for the rule of law and the independence of legal institutions remain uncertain, raising questions about the durability of democratic norms in an era of escalating political vengeance. Based on a report by NBC News 2024-11-19

Copy and paste post removed from an unapproved blog @Hakuna Matata

Doctors, vicars, and other professionals across Britain have been implicated in investigations into non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs), raising questions about the boundaries of free expression and the role of law enforcement in addressing societal tensions. NCHIs, designed to address behavior motivated by hostility toward protected characteristics, have been recorded in cases ranging from personal grievances to professional disputes. Police forces responding to freedom of information requests revealed that incidents have been logged against individuals performing their professional duties. For instance, a doctor faced accusations of hate after allegedly misdiagnosing a patient, while a vicar was labeled a suspect for declaring that being gay was sinful. A notable incident involved a person reporting a hate complaint after being called a “sheep shagger,” a derogatory term for a Welsh individual, and another where someone asked if a Chinese meal came “with bats.” According to guidance, NCHIs should address actions with a clear intent of hostility and the potential to escalate into significant harm or criminal behavior. However, concerns have arisen about the apparent misuse of such measures. Jake Hurfurt, from the privacy advocacy group Big Brother Watch, commented, “Time and time again we are seeing evidence of questionable non-crime hate incidents being recorded by police. Interpersonal squabbles have no place in police records, and forces devalue the concept of real hate crime when they spend time on thousands of these unnecessary reports.” The issue has been compounded by reports that children and journalists have also been subjects of NCHIs. For example, a nine-year-old girl was investigated for calling a classmate a derogatory term, and a journalist was reported for referring to an interview subject as “deaf and dumb.” Some police forces, such as West Yorkshire Police, have defended their approach, emphasizing a commitment to record every incident of alleged hate, regardless of whether it meets the threshold of criminality. In one case, a person claimed their bisexuality led to a misdiagnosis, and another individual alleged discrimination after being denied a spot on a course due to autism. A spokesperson for West Yorkshire Police stated that officers apply their judgment to determine hostility toward protected groups. Humberside Police also recorded an NCHI involving a vicar who allegedly caused distress by stating that being gay was sinful. The force stated it carefully assesses each case, considering vulnerabilities and risks while maintaining a "common-sense and proportionate approach." Other examples revealed by The Times include reports of a social worker accused of racially discriminating against a parent and failing to deliver gifts to children, and a pub incident where a transgender individual alleged they were targeted when asked to leave after being accused of inappropriate behavior. Critics argue that some incidents stretch the purpose of NCHIs. In Norfolk, a man’s comment about “sheep shagger” was logged, while Humberside recorded a hate incident involving a remark about bats and Chinese food. In South Wales, a lesbian couple believed a dead rat on their doorstep was a targeted act, despite the commonality of rats in the area. Surrey Police defended an NCHI where a couple was asked to leave a pub after allegations of inappropriate behavior, asserting that it was justified due to the transgender identity of one individual. In another case, a West Yorkshire woman reported an NCHI after finding a dead pigeon outside her home, linking it to prior harassment. The growing prevalence of NCHIs—13,200 recorded across 45 police forces in the year ending June 2023—has prompted calls for reform. Updated guidance from former Home Secretary Suella Braverman aims to raise the threshold for such reports. As the debate continues, balancing the protection of free expression and addressing genuine hate remains a contentious challenge for law enforcement. Based on a report by The Times & Sunday Times 2024-11-18

A woman has testified to a House Ethics Committee panel that she witnessed former Congressman Matt Gaetz engaging in sexual activity with a minor during a Florida house party in 2017, according to her attorney, Joel Leppard. The explosive allegation, disclosed Friday, has reignited scrutiny around Gaetz, despite a prior Justice Department investigation that did not result in criminal charges. “My client testified to the House Ethics Committee that she witnessed Rep. Gaetz having sex with a minor at a house party in Orlando in 2017,” Leppard told NBC News. The lawyer, representing two witnesses in the case, called for transparency and urged the committee to release its findings on allegations of sexual misconduct. “The American people deserve to know the truth about the person slated to become the top law enforcement officer in the country,” Leppard added, referencing Gaetz’s recent nomination by former President Donald Trump to lead the Department of Justice (DOJ). A spokesperson for Gaetz dismissed the allegations, pointing to the Justice Department's decision not to pursue charges. “Merrick Garland’s DOJ cleared Matt Gaetz and didn’t charge him. Are you alleging Garland is part of a cover-up?” the spokesman stated, emphasizing that the previous investigation concluded without criminal findings. The claims against Gaetz have resurfaced following a report by ABC News that a central figure in the DOJ's earlier sex trafficking investigation testified before the Ethics Committee, alleging that Gaetz had a sexual relationship with her when she was 17 years old. The woman, now in her 20s, was subpoenaed by the ethics panel over the summer and testified about the alleged encounter. Despite the DOJ’s decision not to bring charges last year, the House Ethics Committee continued its own probe into Gaetz's conduct. However, Gaetz’s abrupt resignation from Congress on Wednesday—following his nomination by Trump to lead the DOJ—has complicated the investigation. By stepping down, the 42-year-old is no longer under the jurisdiction of the Ethics Committee, effectively halting the inquiry and preventing the release of its findings. “These allegations are invented and would constitute false testimony to Congress,” Gaetz said in a statement responding to the accusations. “This false smear following a three-year criminal investigation should be viewed with great skepticism.” The decision to end the probe without releasing its conclusions has drawn criticism, with several senators calling for the Ethics Committee’s report to be made public before deliberations on Gaetz’s confirmation to the cabinet post proceed. The controversy surrounding his nomination underscores the broader tension over the allegations and the lingering questions about Gaetz’s past conduct. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-18

In a strike at the end of October, Israel targeted and destroyed an active nuclear weapons research facility in Iran, according to sources from the U.S. and Israeli governments. The attack, which focused on the Taleghan 2 facility within the Parchin military complex, dealt a severe blow to Iran's covert efforts to resume nuclear weapons development. Israeli and U.S. officials have stated that this operation disrupted a significant part of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The Parchin complex, located roughly 20 miles southeast of Tehran, had long been associated with Iran's Amad nuclear weapons program, which officially ceased in 2003. However, recent intelligence suggested renewed activities at Taleghan 2, a site previously thought to be inactive. A former Israeli official revealed that the strike obliterated advanced equipment essential for designing plastic explosives used to trigger a nuclear device. High-resolution satellite images confirmed that the facility had been completely destroyed. This renewed nuclear activity reportedly included computer modeling, metallurgy, and explosive research — processes that could be applied to the development of nuclear weapons while also being framed as civilian scientific research. “They conducted scientific activity that could lay the ground for the production of a nuclear weapon,” a U.S. official explained, emphasizing the secretive nature of the research, known only to a small faction within the Iranian government. Iran has consistently denied pursuing nuclear weapons. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated this stance, stating unequivocally, “Iran is not after nuclear weapons, period.” Despite these denials, Israeli and U.S. intelligence began tracking suspicious activities at Parchin earlier this year. In June, U.S. officials privately warned Iran about the activities but saw no signs of compliance. By late October, the situation had escalated. The attack on Taleghan 2 was strategically timed. Israeli officials reportedly selected the site as part of their retaliation for Iran’s massive missile attack on October 1. U.S. President Joe Biden had cautioned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, warning of the potential for sparking a larger conflict. However, the Israelis pressed forward, targeting a site that Iran had not declared under its nuclear program. This strategic choice meant that Iran could not openly acknowledge the attack without admitting to violations of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. “This strike sent a clear message that the Israelis have deep insights into Iran's secret operations, even those known to only a few within their government,” said a U.S. official. The fallout from this strike is expected to have international repercussions. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will convene next week to vote on a resolution censuring Iran for its lack of cooperation with the UN’s nuclear watchdog. Tehran has hinted that it might respond by limiting its cooperation with the agency. The Taleghan 2 strike highlights the high-stakes power struggle over nuclear capabilities in the region. While Iran denies any intent to develop nuclear weapons, this event underscores the vigilance and determination of Israeli and U.S. intelligence in countering perceived threats to global security. Based on a report by AXIOS 2024-11-18

The investigation into journalist Allison Pearson has sparked a wave of support among female journalists, who warn they could face similar scrutiny over their work or social media posts. Pearson, a columnist for *The Telegraph*, is currently under investigation by three police forces for a now-deleted tweet. The controversy has ignited broader discussions about freedom of expression and the role of the police in regulating speech. On Remembrance Sunday, Pearson was visited at her home by Essex Police. They informed her of a complaint related to her tweet but declined to provide details about the alleged offense or the identity of the complainant. This incident has drawn criticism from fellow journalists, including *Daily Mail* columnist Sarah Vine, who described the situation as a "frightening moment for press freedom." Vine remarked on the pressures faced by journalists, particularly women, saying: “Journalists, and especially female journalists, are used to receiving a lot of abuse. It’s not easy, but it comes with the territory. We console ourselves with the thought that the police and responsible authorities have our back. What has happened to @AllisonPearson has shown that is no longer true. It’s a frightening moment for press freedom. The fact that @Keir_Starmer seems okay with it is even more chilling.” *Daily Mail* journalist Rachel Johnson, the sister of former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, echoed these concerns. Sharing an article written by her brother in Pearson’s defense, she stated: “Hear hear – and so say all of us standing with @AllisonPearson. They messed with the wrong Welshwoman this time, but any one of us could be next.” The investigation centers on whether Pearson’s tweet constituted a Non-Crime Hate Incident (NCHI) or violated the Malicious Communications Act. Although NCHIs are not criminal offenses, they are recorded by police. Essex Police recently clarified that Pearson is now being investigated under section 17 of the Public Order Act for allegedly stirring up racial hatred with a post made in November last year. The controversy has prompted a government review of how police handle NCHIs. Donna Jones, the former chair of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, criticized the approach, arguing that police should not be engaging with individuals unless a crime has been committed. “The police should not be going to somebody’s home if they have not committed a crime,” Jones stated. She added, “If it is a non-crime, it should stop there. Yes, collect the data, feed it into the Home Office, but going further only wastes police resources.” The sentiment was shared by Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Conservative Party, who told *The Telegraph*: “We need to stop this behavior of people wasting police time on trivial incidents because they don’t like something, as if they’re in a nursery.” Other politicians, including Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, and Suella Braverman, former home secretary, have voiced similar frustrations with the policing of speech. Renowned barrister Geoffrey Robertson KC also criticized the investigation, calling it “a waste of public money.” The incident, he suggested, illustrates the need for a reassessment of priorities in policing. As the debate over Pearson’s case continues, the outpouring of support highlights concerns among female journalists about the implications for press freedom. “Any one of us could be next,” Rachel Johnson warned, a sentiment that resonates widely in a profession increasingly under scrutiny for expressing contentious views. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-18

A 19-year-old woman, employed as a Sunday school teacher, allegedly sought the position to encourage children to embrace extremist ideologies, the Old Bailey was told. The defendant, Dzhamilya Timaeva, reportedly used her role to instill beliefs about waging jihad, including distributing a cartoon book titled *Little Muwahideen*, which prosecutors say glorified holy war against non-believers. The court heard that Timaeva was the head teacher at the Windsor Muslim Association and had been preparing to teach at the Tawheed Islamic Education Centre in Maidenhead. She had created lesson plans and a curriculum for the school and ordered 70 copies of the *Little Muwahideen* book, which were delivered to her home in Windsor, just a mile from Windsor Castle. The book, designed for children, emphasized the "duty" of waging war in Islam, the jury was told. Prosecutor Gareth Weetman argued that Timaeva’s actions reflected a broader intent to spread extremist ideologies. He stated: "This is a case about extremism. In simple terms, it is the prosecution case that Dzhamilya Timaeva had extremist beliefs and wanted to encourage others to share those beliefs. The defendant saw it as her duty to teach these extremist beliefs to young children. In order to do so, she obtained a place as a teacher at an Islamic Sunday school." Mr. Weetman emphasized that Timaeva had actively implemented her plans by September 2022, teaching children with the objective of promoting the idea that waging war against non-believers was integral to Islam. "This was all part of her plan to spread to others not just the furtherance of Islamic belief but that part of Islam is waging war against those who do not believe in Islam," he said. Timaeva was arrested at Heathrow Airport while attempting to board a flight to Turkey. Upon searching her iPhone, investigators found a video on her Telegram account titled *Incite the Believers*, which reportedly urged viewers to carry out arson attacks in the West. Additional materials found on her devices included a document on the "permissibility of suicidal operations" and a note titled *The Woman I Want to Be*, which included aspirations of raising children to become soldiers for Allah. The prosecution also revealed videos supporting ISIS, the extremist organization that once controlled large swaths of Syria and Iraq, were stored on Timaeva’s phone. Mr. Weetman added, “Police discovered several videos in support of ISIS, highlighting her extremist views and intent.” Timaeva, who has been released on bail, denies charges of disseminating terrorist documents and possessing materials for terrorist purposes between October 2022 and February 2023. Her trial is ongoing. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-18

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has issued a formal apology to survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care homes, addressing a scandal that has left a deep scar on the nation’s history. Speaking in parliament, Luxon acknowledged the immense suffering endured by an estimated 200,000 children and vulnerable adults who were subjected to abuse between 1950 and 2019. "I make this apology to all survivors on behalf of my own and previous governments," Luxon declared solemnly. "It was horrific. It was heartbreaking. It was wrong. And it should never have happened. For many of you, it changed the course of your life, and for that, the government must take responsibility." The apology follows a six-year inquiry described by Luxon as the largest and most complex public investigation ever undertaken in New Zealand. It involved interviews with over 2,300 survivors and documented an extensive array of abuses, including rape, forced sterilisation, and child labour. The report also revealed that faith-based care institutions often had higher rates of sexual abuse than state-run facilities. In many cases, abusers were shielded by religious and civil leaders who moved them to new locations, denying accountability and prolonging the victims' quest for justice. Tragically, many survivors did not live to see their stories validated. The findings have been a harrowing vindication for survivors who fought for decades to expose the abuse and overcome systemic denial. Tupua Urlich, a Māori survivor who shared his testimony during the inquiry, expressed that the apology alone is insufficient. “The effects of that trauma came through later on in life,” Urlich told the BBC. “It’s not just the physical abuse; it was the disconnection from my family, from my culture.” Urlich questioned whether the apology would translate into meaningful action. "Justice? No, not yet... These words are nothing unless they're followed by action, and the right kind of action that is informed by survivors. The government have proven that alone they're not trusted, nor capable, of providing the sort of change and service that we need." The abuse disproportionately affected Māori and Pacific communities, as well as individuals with mental or physical disabilities, compounding existing inequities. Survivors and advocates are now calling for comprehensive reforms to the care system, coupled with a robust restitution framework. While the government has pledged systemic reform, details of a compensation scheme are not expected until early next year. Luxon's apology, though historic, is seen by many as merely the beginning of a long-overdue reckoning with the failures of New Zealand’s care systems. Survivors and their supporters continue to demand justice, ensuring that the apology is not merely symbolic but a foundation for real and lasting change. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-18

Britain should align its trade priorities with the United States rather than the European Union's "socialist model," according to Stephen Moore, a senior economic adviser to Donald Trump. Moore's comments come as the former president-elect considers policies that could include sweeping tariffs, potentially sparking global trade tensions and significantly impacting the UK economy. Moore, speaking from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, Florida, suggested the US would be "less interested" in pursuing a free trade agreement with Britain if it moves toward closer alignment with the EU. "I’ve always said that Britain has to decide — do you want to go towards the European socialist model or do you want to go towards the US free market? Lately, it seems like they are shifting more in a European model, and so if that’s the case, I think we’d be less interested in having [a free trade deal]," he stated. The UK’s trade relationship with the EU remains a critical issue. Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has prioritized negotiating closer ties with Brussels, aiming to bolster economic growth. Similarly, Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, recently emphasized the need to rebuild trade relations with the EU, arguing that Brexit had weighed on the UK economy. Labour has proposed easing post-Brexit checks on goods crossing the Channel and securing EU recognition of UK professional qualifications. Moore noted that Trump’s proposed tariffs — as high as 20% on imports generally and up to 60% on goods from China — reflect his mandate to revitalize American manufacturing and create jobs. While tariffs could trigger a global trade war, Moore argued they might also "shift production more to domestic" industries, stating, "I’m a free trader, but the public agrees with Trump, and so I think we will see tariffs." Trump himself recently declared that “tariffs” were “the most beautiful word in the dictionary.” The potential implications for Britain are substantial. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research has estimated that Trump’s tariff policies could halve the UK’s GDP growth, creating a £21.5 billion shortfall in the country’s tax and spending plans while driving inflation up by 3 to 4 percentage points. While the EU has prepared retaliatory tariffs targeting iconic American goods like Levi’s jeans and Harley Davidson motorcycles, the UK is unlikely to follow suit, fearing escalation. Instead, ministers are reportedly seeking a carve-out from US tariffs. A free trade deal between the US and UK remains a contentious issue. Boris Johnson’s government previously pursued such an agreement during Trump’s administration, but talks stalled over disputes regarding American agricultural standards. Current Labour leadership, including Chancellor Rachel Reeves, has ruled out allowing imports of chlorine-washed chicken or hormone-treated beef, emphasizing, "We are not going to allow British farmers to be undercut by different rules and regulations in other countries." Moore, who has warmed to Trump’s protectionist rhetoric, explained the strategy: "What he’s talking about is using — he put it very well — raising taxes on things made in China, Mexico, and Europe but lowering taxes on things made here." He acknowledged concerns about trade wars but echoed Trump’s sentiment that such conflicts already exist in practice. Lord Mandelson, a contender for the role of British ambassador to Washington, has advocated for a pragmatic approach. He suggested the UK pursue a limited agreement focusing on digital services and technology. Meanwhile, Lord Darroch, a former British ambassador to the US, predicted that Trump would act decisively on tariffs, leveraging them to demand concessions from trading partners. As the UK navigates its post-Brexit trade strategy, the choice between closer ties with the EU or the US looms large, with significant economic and political consequences tied to either path. Based on a report by the Times and Sunday Times 2024-11-18

The magnetic North Pole, a crucial element of navigation systems worldwide, is shifting toward Russia in an unprecedented manner, as revealed by new data from the British Geological Survey (BGS). While the pole's movement is not new, its current behavior and pace have intrigued scientists. In the northern hemisphere, compass needles point to the magnetic North Pole, a location shaped by the Earth's ever-changing magnetic field. Unlike the geographic North Pole, which remains stationary at the convergence of longitude lines, the magnetic pole has been in constant motion. Historically, it meandered near northern Canada’s coast but began accelerating toward Siberia in the 1990s. From 1600 to 1990, the pole moved approximately six miles annually. That rate surged to 34 miles per year in the 2000s, only to slow to 22 miles per year in the past five years—a deceleration that scientists have never recorded before. The findings come from the BGS, which collaborates with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to maintain the World Magnetic Model. Updated every five years, this model predicts the pole’s location and underpins technologies ranging from smartphone compass tools to military navigation systems. William Brown, a global geomagnetic field modeller at the BGS, emphasized its significance, stating, “Planes, boats, submarines, you name it, it’s in there.” The pole’s movement originates deep within the Earth, where molten iron churns in the planet's outer core. This liquid iron, driven by heat escaping from the core, generates the Earth’s magnetic field. Variations in the swirling patterns, roughly 2,000 miles below the surface, influence the magnetic field’s strength and the pole’s position. Describing this dynamic process, Brown compared it to a “giant cup of tea,” noting that the molten outer core has the viscosity of water and is in constant motion. Monitoring these shifts, however, remains complex. When Sir James Clark Ross, a Royal Navy officer and polar explorer, first located the magnetic pole in 1831, he relied on a magnetic needle that pointed directly downward. Today, the BGS employs advanced technology, using satellites and a network of ground stations to observe and map the Earth’s magnetic field. This data sheds light on the behavior of the molten core and its impact on the pole’s location. Professor Phil Livermore from the University of Leeds has offered an explanation for the pole’s unusual recent activity. He describes it as a “tug-of-war” between two magnetic patches—one beneath Canada and another under Siberia. Livermore explained that the Canadian patch seems to have stretched and split, slightly increasing the relative strength of the Siberian patch. This imbalance likely accounts for the pole’s gradual shift toward Russia. While predicting the future behavior of the magnetic North Pole remains elusive, the ongoing monitoring by scientists ensures a better understanding of these complex processes, which are vital for navigation and technology worldwide. Based on a report by the Times and Sunday Times 2024-11-18

In a harrowing incident outside Timberline High School in Lacey, Washington, a 17-year-old girl was nearly choked to death by her parents in what police are calling an attempted "honor killing." The girl, whose name has not been released, had run away from home to escape an arranged marriage and sought refuge at her school, where her 16-year-old boyfriend also studied. As she and her boyfriend waited at a bus stop near the school, her father, who had been waiting in his truck, confronted them. Yelling in Arabic, Ihsan escalated the situation when another student intervened, shouting in Arabic for him to leave the girl alone. Enraged, Ihsan punched the girl’s boyfriend before placing his daughter in a headlock. According to witnesses and police reports, the girl’s boyfriend and other students intervened when they saw her begin to lose consciousness, her arms flailing before going limp. Victor Barnes, the boyfriend's father, recounted the chilling moments, stating, "My son starts to see her eyes roll back… he tried to save her." With the help of others, the boyfriend subdued Ihsan, repeatedly striking him until he released his grip. As bystanders restrained Ihsan, Zahraa allegedly joined the attack, attempting to choke her daughter. Students intervened once more, pulling the girl away and preventing further harm. Amid the chaos, the girl’s older sister reportedly attempted to fight off the students, but they successfully separated the mother from her daughter. Witness Josh Wagner, who stopped his car believing he was witnessing a schoolyard fight, helped restrain Ihsan until police arrived. The girl, visibly shaken, fled into the school with her boyfriend, yelling, "My dad was trying to kill me." Zahraa reportedly pursued her into the school but was denied entry. The principal eventually placed the school on lockdown to ensure the girl’s safety. Both parents were arrested at the scene and later appeared in Thurston County Superior Court on November 5. Court records indicate that Ihsan and Zahraa remain in custody on bonds of $100,000 and $200,000, respectively. This horrifying incident has drawn attention to the dangers some individuals face when they resist cultural or familial expectations. The girl's survival was due in large part to the courage and quick action of her peers and strangers who intervened in her time of need. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-18

In his forthcoming memoir *Citizen,* former President Bill Clinton addresses his past connections to Jeffrey Epstein, adamantly denying allegations of visiting Epstein's private Caribbean island while acknowledging travel on the financier’s private plane in 2002 and 2003. Clinton claims his use of Epstein's plane—infamously dubbed the “Lolita Express”—was tied to his work with the Clinton Global Initiative. “The bottom line is, even though it allowed me to visit the work of my foundation, traveling on Epstein’s plane was not worth the years of questioning afterward,” Clinton writes in the memoir, according to excerpts reported by *The US Sun*. He admits to finding Epstein “odd” but insists he had no knowledge of the crimes later associated with the disgraced financier. “He hurt a lot of people, but I knew nothing about it, and by the time he was first arrested in 2005, I had stopped contact with him. I’ve never visited his island,” Clinton states. Epstein’s private island, Little Saint James, has been at the center of allegations of underage sex trafficking. Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s accusers, alleged in 2020 that Clinton was a guest on the island, though she did not accuse him of any wrongdoing. Clinton denies these claims and expresses regret for having ever met Epstein. “I wish I had never met him,” he writes. The memoir also reveals that Clinton met Epstein privately on only two occasions—once at Epstein’s Upper East Side townhouse and another time at the Clinton Global Initiative offices in Harlem. These interactions, according to Clinton, were brief. In 2019, a Clinton spokesperson confirmed the former president flew on Epstein’s plane four times between 2002 and 2003, traveling to Europe, Asia, and Africa. One such trip included a stop in Africa for a humanitarian mission, during which Clinton was photographed receiving a backrub from Chauntae Davies, a flight attendant and Epstein accuser. Davies later clarified that the massage occurred during a layover and described it as consensual and nonsexual. Beyond the Epstein controversy, Clinton uses *Citizen* to reflect on his 2018 NBC interview with Craig Melvin, where he was questioned about his affair with Monica Lewinsky in light of the MeToo movement. Clinton recalls being “caught off guard” and frustrated during the interview, particularly when pressed about whether he had personally apologized to Lewinsky. “I said, ‘No, I felt terrible then,’” Clinton writes, paraphrasing his response to Melvin. The interviewer followed up, asking, “‘Did you ever apologize to her?’” Clinton responded that he had apologized publicly multiple times, but Melvin challenged him, stating others claimed no direct apology had been made. Clinton explains in the book that he publicly apologized in 1999 alongside faith leaders at the White House, naming Lewinsky, her family, his own family, and the American public as the parties he wronged. “I meant it then, and I mean it today,” he concludes. The memoir presents Clinton’s efforts to clarify lingering questions about his controversial associations and past actions, offering insights into both the Epstein connection and the fallout from his presidency’s most notorious scandal. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-18

New Zealand's parliament witnessed a rare moment of cultural resistance as MPs performed a haka to protest a contentious bill aimed at redefining the Treaty of Waitangi, the nation’s founding document between the Crown and Māori people. The legislative chamber temporarily halted its proceedings after opposition MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke led the ceremonial dance when questioned about her party's stance on the proposed legislation. Critics, however, fear the bill threatens Māori rights and undermines efforts toward equity. Kiriana O’Connell, a Māori protester, rejected the notion of altering the treaty’s principles, stating, “The current treaty principles are already a compromise for our people.” Similarly, Juliet Tainui-Hernández, from the Māori tribe Ngāi Tahu, attended the hīkoi with her family to support an inclusive future for New Zealand’s children and grandchildren. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, while part of the ruling coalition with Act, described the bill as "divisive." Opposition also came from the Waitangi Tribunal, which criticized the lack of consultation with Māori in drafting the bill. It deemed the legislation a breach of the Crown's partnership obligations and warned that the proposed reinterpretation of treaty principles would harm Māori interests. The controversy extends beyond this bill, with many Māori perceiving it as part of a broader trend. Recent government decisions, such as disbanding the Māori Health Authority and reprioritizing English over Māori in naming official organizations, have fueled concerns. Despite comprising about 18% of New Zealand's population, Māori communities continue to face systemic disadvantages, including disparities in health, income, education, and life expectancy. The Treaty of Waitangi, signed in 1840, remains contentious due to discrepancies between its English and Māori texts, particularly concerning sovereignty. While not codified in law, its principles have been embedded in various legislative frameworks. The proposed bill, which passed its first reading with support from all coalition parties, will now undergo a six-month public consultation. However, its future remains uncertain, as coalition partners signal reluctance to back it in subsequent readings. For many, including Winston Pond, who joined the march in Auckland, the hīkoi represents more than just opposition to the bill. “I marched to make the point that Te Tiriti [the Treaty of Waitangi] is very important to our national identity,” he said. As the march progresses, its message reverberates across New Zealand, calling for a reaffirmation of the country’s commitment to equity and respect for its bicultural foundations. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-18

A pure trolling post has been removed @stevenl

Off topic troll post making further unsubstaniated claims has been removed

Troll post removed @pattayasan

A post with zero content aside from "+1" is not a discussion or information post @thaibeachlovers that is why the forum has the facility for the use of emoji's as you well know. I note you additionaly practise this on other topics, they have also been removed.

As the world contends with climate change, Europe’s right-wing leaders are crafting a unique approach that blends climate action with nationalist priorities, offering a blueprint for conservative climate diplomacy. While Donald Trump has signaled plans to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement if he returns to office, leaders in Europe’s right-wing governments are taking a different path. This year’s COP29 climate summit in Baku showcased how nationalist leaders in Europe, such as Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, are reconciling their political ideals with elements of climate action. Although right-wing populism is generally linked with less aggressive climate measures, governments from Italy to Turkey are advancing climate initiatives. Their motivations include protecting economic interests and preventing climate-driven migration. Some leaders, particularly Azerbaijan's Ilham Aliyev, have used climate summits as a platform to "greenwash" authoritarian regimes or to soften the perception of their fossil fuel industries. With notable absences from the summit, including Germany’s Chancellor Olaf Scholz and France’s President Emmanuel Macron, the stage was set for right-wing leaders to steer Europe’s presence at COP29. A close look at their approaches reveals a "green playbook" focused on economic gains, curbing migration, promoting nuclear energy, defending local industries, and showcasing leadership. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán set the tone by asserting his opposition to burdensome environmental regulations while praising his country’s progress in clean technology. “We are positioning ourselves to be a significant player in electric vehicle development and electricity storage,” he said, reflecting a push to profit from the booming green economy. A European climate negotiator described this approach as pragmatic, noting that “our companies see they can make money from the green transition… the earlier you start, the bigger a winner you’ll be as a company or a country.” For Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, migration policy intersects with climate. She argues that funding climate action in developing regions like Africa could reduce migration to Europe by creating local opportunities. Italy, under Meloni, has taken steps to expand economic partnerships with African nations, aiming to improve infrastructure and job creation. Last year, Italy pledged €100 million to a fund supporting countries impacted by climate disasters, while a €4 billion initiative has been set up for climate action abroad. At COP29, Meloni emphasized Italy’s ongoing commitment, stating, “Italy intends to continue to do its part.” Right-wing leaders also emphasized nuclear energy as a clean yet stable power source. Poland’s President Andrzej Duda declared, “I believe that nuclear is [the] future and it is only nuclear that will help us to achieve our climate goals.” This view was echoed by Slovakia’s President Peter Pellegrini, who emphasized nuclear power’s role in achieving climate neutrality. Immigration concerns were woven into these discussions, with Orbán criticizing climate legislation that, in his view, places undue burdens on European farmers. “We cannot sacrifice our industry for agriculture… We cannot impose unrealistic quotas or burdensome rules on farmers,” he declared. Duda, addressing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, also linked regional security to climate concerns, stating, “Russian aggression against Ukraine has shown us that armed conflicts also result in serious environmental damage and pollution.” While some right-wing leaders used the summit to highlight their own environmental efforts, they remained cautious about embracing a full green agenda. Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, for instance, avoided mentioning his country’s conflict with Ukraine and instead committed to “the wellbeing of future generations.” Similarly, Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan promoted his country’s ambitions to host COP31, even though Turkey only ratified the Paris Agreement three years ago. Italian Prime Minister Meloni wrapped up her address with a perspective that encapsulates this nationalist climate approach. “We must protect nature,” she said, “with man at its core.” The speeches at COP29 show how Europe’s right-wing leaders are blending climate action with nationalist rhetoric, positioning themselves as pragmatic stewards of both environmental and national interests. Based on a report by Politico 2024-11-16

Two activists have been charged following an incident in which orange paint powder was thrown over Stonehenge as part of a Just Stop Oil protest, aimed at halting the use of fossil fuels. Rajan Naidu, 73, of Birmingham, and Niamh Lynch, 22, of Bedford, face charges of causing damage to an ancient protected monument, and intentionally or recklessly creating a public nuisance. The pair were arrested in June after dousing the historic monument with orange cornflour powder on the eve of the summer solstice, drawing significant public backlash. Wiltshire Police confirmed the charges, with both Naidu and Lynch due to appear in Salisbury Magistrates’ Court on December 13. Just Stop Oil, the organization behind the protest, stated that the action was intended to pressure the government to cease the extraction and use of oil, gas, and coal by the year 2030. The protest group has increasingly used high-profile demonstrations to bring attention to its demands for environmental reforms. The incident was widely condemned by political leaders and public figures. Then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Labour leader Keir Starmer both voiced disapproval, calling the act unacceptable. English Heritage chief executive Dr. Nick Merriman commented on the impact of the protest, saying, “It’s difficult to understand and we’re deeply saddened about this vandalism, but we’ve been really touched by the messages of sympathy and support we’ve had.” He added that English Heritage's conservation team was quick to respond, as the colored powder on the stones posed a risk if it came into contact with water. “Our experts have already managed to clean the orange powder from the stones,” Dr. Merriman explained, noting that the cleanup was completed with care to prevent any lasting damage. Sophie Stevens, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS Wessex, stated, “The Crown Prosecution Service has authorized Wiltshire Police to charge Naidu Rajan and Niamh Lynch with offences related to damage caused to the protected monument Stonehenge on 19 June 2024.” Related: Stonehenge Seriously Vandalized by Just Stop Oil Activists, Prompting Arrests and Outrage Based on a report by the Standard 2024-11-16

Three former employees of Harrods department store have come forward with allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking by Salah Fayed, a brother of Mohamed Al Fayed, from 1989 to 1997. The women, who shared their experiences with the BBC, claim that Salah abused them in various locations, including London, the south of France, and Monaco. One of the women, identified as Helen, has waived her right to anonymity, sharing painful details of her experiences after decades of silence. Helen, who was 23 and enjoying what she described as her "dream" job at Harrods, alleges that Mohamed Al Fayed raped her in a Dubai hotel room. She recalls, "It was like out of a horror film... I was in my nightie, and he grabbed my hand, started pulling me out of the bathroom. I was really trying to stop him, but I couldn't." She describes feeling helpless and far from home, isolated from anyone who might support her. Following the incident, she was instructed to sign a non-disclosure agreement with Harrods. "They've stolen a part of me," she says. "It's changed the course of my entire life." The agreement, Helen says, as well as her fear of reprisal, prevented her from speaking out for over 35 years. In an attempt to escape further encounters with Mohamed Al Fayed, Helen accepted an offer to work for his younger brother, Salah. She thought this opportunity would provide her with a fresh start, but her relief was short-lived. Helen recalls Salah offering her champagne, after which she began to feel disoriented. "Within a few sips, I was starting to feel a bit groggy... it was a really dizzy and weird feeling," she explains. At one point, Salah pressured her to try a bong with crack cocaine, assuring her, "This will make you feel better." This is the last memory Helen has of the evening, which she believes ended with her unconscious and defenseless. She remembers regaining consciousness on a couch in a different room, feeling confused and physically unwell. Her jeans were unbuttoned, and her belt was missing. Helen recalls a painful sensation between her legs and, upon discovering semen, realized what had likely happened. "I knew then what had happened. I knew," she says. In the aftermath, Helen says that Salah contacted Mohamed in her presence, speaking in Arabic. She recalls, "All I could hear was them laughing to each other." As Salah walked her back to her apartment, he introduced her to a friend who had apparently seen her the previous night. Helen now believes that Salah's friend also assaulted her while she was unconscious. Two other former Harrods employees shared similar allegations of abuse by both Mohamed and Salah Fayed. One of these women claims she was manipulated into trying crack cocaine, after which Salah would exploit her vulnerability. "He was trying to get me hooked on crack so he could do whatever he wanted to me," she told the BBC. Helen, who eventually resigned from Harrods, expresses profound grief over her experiences and the impact they’ve had on her life. "I didn’t want to see his face again," she says. Reflecting on the years of silence that followed, Helen shares that breaking her silence now, even after so long, feels essential: "It's the hardest thing I've ever had to say." These accounts shed light on the alleged misuse of power within Harrods and the personal toll on the women involved. Their decision to come forward, despite fears of retaliation, reflects their determination to seek accountability and validate their experiences after decades of feeling voiceless. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-16

Private jet traffic to Baku, Azerbaijan, has surged as global leaders and influential figures gather for the UN’s annual climate summit, Cop29, igniting accusations of hypocrisy over the choice of high-emission travel. In the lead-up to the event, Baku’s international airport recorded 65 private jet landings, with 45 arriving on Sunday and Monday as delegates convened. This marks a significant increase from last year, when 32 private jets landed during the same period. While this count is lower than in Dubai last year or Glasgow in 2021, the surge in high-carbon flights has drawn attention, especially as high-profile attendees seek to address the global climate crisis. The optics of these arrivals have triggered criticism from environmental advocates who highlight the outsized emissions linked to private jets. Denise Auclair, representing the Travel Smart Campaign, stressed the impact of these flights, noting, “Private jets have a disproportionate impact on the environment. They are five to 14 times more polluting than commercial planes per passenger and 50 times more polluting than trains. The number of arrivals by private jet we are seeing at Cop29 puts front and center the hypocrisy of using a private jet while claiming to be fighting climate change.” Auclair added that for some executives, a single long-haul private flight can produce more CO₂ than multiple people might emit over the course of an entire year. This critique echoes findings from Linnaeus University in Sweden, where researchers analyzed over 18.6 million private flights, revealing that certain celebrities produce over 500 times the annual carbon emissions of the average person. Events such as the 2022 Qatar World Cup and last year’s Cannes Film Festival have been linked to major spikes in private jet use. In comparison, last year’s Cop28 in Dubai saw 644 private flights, which collectively emitted an estimated 4,800 tonnes of CO₂. Despite these figures, sources close to aviation operations argue there are “understandable” reasons for some dignitaries to forgo commercial travel, citing security and logistical challenges. Yet the environmental impact remains clear. Between 2019 and last year, annual private aviation emissions rose by 46 percent, reaching 15.6 million tonnes of CO₂—roughly equivalent to Nepal’s yearly emissions. Climate advocates like Alethea Warrington of the charity Possible denounce the practice. “For CEOs who claim to care about tackling the climate crisis, using a private jet to get to Cop shows blatant hypocrisy,” Warrington stated. “Travelling by private jet is a horrendous waste of the world’s scarce remaining carbon budget, with each journey producing more emissions in a few hours than the average person around the world emits in an entire year.” The conference also saw some notable absences, with leaders from several of the top 13 carbon-emitting nations, including U.S. President Biden, China’s President Xi Jinping, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, opting not to attend. Argentina’s President Javier Milei went a step further, ordering his country’s representatives to withdraw entirely from Cop29. Known for his controversial views on climate change, which he once dismissed as a “socialist lie,” Milei has also signaled the possibility of Argentina’s exit from the Paris Agreement, which mandates greenhouse gas reductions. With over 67,000 people registered, this year’s conference is the second largest in history, following Dubai’s Cop28. The gathering has underscored the urgency of addressing climate change but also highlighted ongoing challenges in aligning global commitments with the actual practices of those in power. For many critics, the arrival of private jets in such high numbers is a troubling contradiction at a moment demanding tangible action. Based on a report by The Times 2024-11-16