Social Media

Britain may align with the European Union in any global trade dispute ignited by former U.S. President Donald Trump’s potential return to the White House, suggested Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds. Highlighting the UK's close trading ties with the EU, Reynolds underscored the need to balance relations with Brussels against pressures from Washington. Trump has reportedly considered imposing hefty tariffs of up to 60% on Chinese goods and up to 20% on imports from other nations, a move experts warn could spark a global trade war. European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has cautioned that such geopolitical shifts place the single market under significant strain. Speaking to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee, Reynolds addressed the implications for Britain: "Tariffs on UK goods entering the U.S. would be a difficult thing for us to contend with. The U.S. is a key trading partner with £300 billion in bilateral trade. But compared to the EU, with over £800 billion in trade, we would have to weigh the consequences of actions that risk our relationship with Europe." Reynolds also noted the UK’s heightened vulnerability in a trade confrontation with China due to its global trade dependencies. "If there were a broader trade conflict between China and the West, the UK, as a globally oriented trading nation, would face more pain than the U.S. Simply replicating policies proposed by other nations might be more damaging to us than many realize," he said. His remarks come as the Labour government seeks to recalibrate its diplomatic relationships, including with the U.S., where Reynolds's comments risk creating tensions. Conservative critics argue that prioritizing Brussels over Washington could squander a valuable opportunity for deeper trade ties with America. Maxwell Marlow of the Adam Smith Institute warned against aligning too closely with the EU, saying, "The EU is synonymous with heavy-handed regulation and red tape, while America champions innovation and dynamism. Embracing Europe’s degrowth agenda will make Britain poorer and alienate our American allies. Instead, the UK should pursue a full-fat free trade agreement with the U.S." Meanwhile, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer met with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the G20 summit in Brazil, marking the first high-level UK-China talks since 2018. President Xi appeared to endorse Labour's economic vision, saying, "The UK is working to fix its economic foundations and rebuild Britain." However, this meeting drew criticism from Conservative figures, including former Cabinet minister Sir Iain Duncan Smith, who accused Starmer of “kowtowing” to an authoritarian regime. "Those suffering under Xi’s genocidal policies and forced labor will feel betrayed," he said. Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge acknowledged the importance of dialogue but stressed the need to recognize China’s "huge threat" to democratic values. As the geopolitical landscape becomes increasingly volatile, Britain’s position in navigating complex relationships with the U.S., EU, and China remains critical. The government's next steps will likely determine whether it can safeguard its economic and political interests without alienating key allies. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-20

In a case that shocked the nation, an Atlanta mother who killed her two toddler sons by placing them in an oven and sending horrifying footage of their lifeless bodies to their father has been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Lamora Williams, now 30, was convicted of the gruesome murders of Ke’Younte Penn, 2, and Ja’Karter Williams, 1, an act described by the jury as deliberate and chillingly cruel. The crime occurred in October 2017 when Williams, then 24 and a single mother, “knowingly and intentionally” forced her two young boys into an oven, turning it on and causing their deaths. Authorities responding to the scene found the children severely burned, a discovery that stunned even seasoned investigators. Initially, Williams attempted to distance herself from the crime, calling 911 with a fabricated account. She claimed she had come home from work to find her children dead and their caregiver missing. “When I came in, the stove was laying on my son, on my youngest son’s head, and my other son was laid out on the floor with his brains laid out on the floor,” she told the dispatcher in an eerie call. Desperate to avoid suspicion, she pleaded, “I don’t want to get locked up because this is not my fault.” Williams also contacted the children’s father, Jameel Penn, and showed him live video footage of the grisly aftermath. The devastated father, who immediately called 911 upon seeing the footage, later described the ordeal as “like a real horror movie. It was Friday the 13th.” Despite pleading not guilty and maintaining her innocence, a jury found Williams guilty of 14 charges, including felony murder, child cruelty, and providing false statements. On Friday, she was sentenced to life in prison without parole, with an additional 35 years. Williams’ mother, Brenda Williams, revealed that her daughter had a history of mental illness and suggested that the tragic incident might have been triggered by her breakup with Penn. She stated that her daughter had likely “snapped” under the strain of her circumstances. While in custody, Lamora Williams was placed under suicide watch, underscoring the ongoing concerns about her mental health. Tabitha Hollingsworth, Williams’ sister, expressed heartbreak over the preventability of the children’s deaths. As the family continues to grapple with the enormity of this tragedy, the case serves as a grim reminder of the devastating consequences of untreated mental illness and unchecked emotional instability. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-20

Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur and owner of X (formerly Twitter), has sparked fresh controversy with his criticism of Britain’s proposed tax policy targeting farmers. Responding to an article in *The Observer*, Musk claimed the UK was going “full Stalin” over Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s plan to revoke inheritance tax exemptions for certain agricultural assets. The article, written by former *Observer* editor Will Hutton, argued that Labour’s policy would revitalize rural communities. Hutton suggested that lowering farmland prices by removing tax exemptions could enable younger generations to acquire land. In a pointed response on X, Musk drew a parallel between this policy and the Soviet collectivization of the 1930s under Joseph Stalin, a campaign that forcibly redistributed farmland and led to widespread hardship and famine. The proposed policy, announced in October’s budget by Labour’s Rachel Reeves, seeks to end inheritance tax exemptions on agricultural assets valued over £1 million. Farmers’ unions, however, have condemned the plan. The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has labeled it “disastrous,” expressing fears that it could decimate family farms. Many farmers are planning a mass demonstration in London to demand that the Government reconsider. Farmers argue that the policy could have far-reaching consequences, with the NFU accusing Reeves of using misleading data. The union claims that the Treasury has underestimated the number of farms affected, suggesting the actual figure is double the official estimate. Musk, known for his outspoken nature and political commentary, had previously criticized the policy, saying: “We should leave our farmers alone. We [owe] farmers immense gratitude for making the food on our tables!” This latest remark adds to his history of high-profile interventions on global political issues. Downing Street has refrained from directly addressing Musk’s critique. A spokesperson stated: “We’re not going to get into a back and forth on individual comments. We will continue to engage with the industry and explain how the process works, and it remains the case that we expect the vast majority of farmers to be unaffected by the changes.” The spokesperson also emphasized the Prime Minister’s ongoing support for farmers, reiterating their importance to the nation and promising efforts to provide reassurance about the policy’s impact. As tensions escalate, thousands of farmers are poised to take their concerns directly to MPs, highlighting the growing unease over policies that they fear could undermine Britain’s agricultural backbone. Musk’s dramatic intervention adds another layer of complexity to the debate, amplifying global attention on a policy that has already divided public opinion. Jonathan Charlesworth, the son of a farmer who took his own life, believes that the new inheritance tax policy announced by the government pushed him over the edge and caused him to take his own life. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph & Sky News 2024-11-20

A California man convicted of the brutal murder of a gay, Jewish college student in a hate-fueled attack was sentenced to life in prison without parole. Samuel Woodward, 27, received his sentence in a Southern California courtroom nearly seven years after the killing of Blaze Bernstein, a University of Pennsylvania sophomore. Woodward, who was absent from court due to illness, had been convicted earlier this year of first-degree murder with a hate crime enhancement. Prosecutors established that Woodward’s attack on Bernstein was motivated by deep-seated animosity toward the victim’s sexual orientation and faith. In a courtroom filled with Bernstein’s family and friends, the emotional weight of the tragedy was palpable. Many attendees wore shirts emblazoned with the phrase “Blaze it Forward,” a campaign inspired by Bernstein’s memory to encourage acts of kindness. Speaking through grief, Bernstein’s mother, Jeanne Pepper, directly addressed the court: “Let’s be clear: This was a hate crime. Samuel Woodward ended my son’s life because my son was Jewish and gay.” She added, “Blaze’s memory and spirit will live on in every kind deed done in his honor.” The sentencing came as no surprise, given the jury’s verdict. Kimberly Edds, spokesperson for the Orange County District Attorney’s Office, confirmed that the life sentence was mandatory. However, Woodward’s attorney, Ken Morrison, sought a lesser sentence of 28 years to life, arguing that jurors hadn’t been presented with all the evidence during the trial. Morrison also indicated plans to appeal the verdict. Blaze Bernstein, just 19 years old at the time, went missing in January 2018 after meeting Woodward, a former high school classmate, at a park in Lake Forest, California. When Bernstein failed to show up for a dentist appointment the next day, his parents searched his room, finding his glasses, wallet, and credit cards, but no sign of him. The family’s investigation into his social media revealed that he had been communicating with Woodward on Snapchat. Initially, Woodward claimed that Bernstein had left the park to meet another friend. However, days later, Bernstein’s body was discovered in a shallow grave in the same park. He had been stabbed repeatedly in the face and neck. The trial focused not on whether Woodward had killed Bernstein but on his motives. Prosecutors argued that Woodward’s actions were tied to his association with Atomwaffen Division, a neo-Nazi hate group known for targeting minorities and LGBTQ+ individuals. Defense attorney Morrison countered that Woodward had no plan to kill Bernstein, attributing the crime to personal struggles stemming from a long-undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder and confusion about his sexuality, exacerbated by his conservative upbringing. Evidence presented during the trial painted a chilling picture of Woodward’s mindset. Authorities recovered a black Atomwaffen mask, a bloodied knife, and antisemitic and anti-gay materials during a search of his family’s Newport Beach home. Prosecutors also revealed that Woodward had used dating apps to lure gay men, abruptly cutting off contact after meeting them, and kept a hateful journal documenting his actions. The case drew widespread attention and outrage in Southern California, particularly in 2018, when local residents joined authorities in searching for Bernstein after his disappearance. The delays in bringing the case to trial further heightened public frustration. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-20

The foundational principle of medicine, "First, do no harm," appears at odds with the idea of placing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services. While there’s an argument that his advocacy for healthier lifestyles could be beneficial, his controversial views on health issues suggest more harm than good may result. In May 2023, during his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, Kennedy sat down to discuss his platform. He showcased his independence, criticizing President Biden’s policies and lamenting the Democratic Party's shift after Donald Trump's 2016 election. While these perspectives earned respect for their political insight, they had little connection to his views on public health, which seemed unmoored from scientific consensus. Kennedy’s health-related theories are a tangle of questionable claims, from blaming “neocons” for America’s problems to suggesting that “pesticides, cellphones, ultrasound” contribute to conditions like Tourette syndrome and peanut allergies. He also posited that the country’s chronic health issues can be traced to a single year in the 1980s when several “bad things” supposedly converged. Such assertions, while appealing to conspiracy theorists on social media, fail to resonate with evidence-based reasoning. Despite his ability to critique issues like the dysfunctional relationship between federal agencies and Big Pharma, Kennedy’s solutions seem impractical. While the pharmaceutical industry has its flaws, it also plays a critical role in innovation and employment. A radical overhaul of the industry, as Kennedy has suggested, could lead to unintended consequences, including economic disruption and a potential decline in access to life-saving medications. Kennedy’s positions also clash with Donald Trump’s priorities. His opposition to fracking, pesticides, and fertilizers undermines Trump’s commitment to supporting farmers and the energy sector. Such contradictions raise questions about how Kennedy could fit into a broader agenda focused on economic growth and stability. The Department of Health and Human Services oversees over 100 programs and employs more than 83,000 people. Effective leadership in this role demands stability and pragmatic decision-making, not the divisive rhetoric or prolonged disruptions that might follow Kennedy’s appointment. The Senate, where Republicans have a slim margin, is unlikely to confirm such a polarizing figure without a fight, further complicating the situation. Trump’s campaign hinges on addressing pressing issues like the economy, border security, and global instability. Diverting resources and attention to defend or manage Kennedy’s controversial positions risks derailing those priorities. The suggestion that a “worm” impacted Kennedy’s cognitive judgment might be hyperbole, but it underscores the broader concern: Kennedy’s appointment could introduce chaos where clarity and competence are paramount. He told us with full conviction that all America’s chronic health problems began in one year in the 1980s when a dozen bad things happened. Convincing to the gullible conspiracy-hungry crowd on Twitter, but not to the rest of us. In fact, we came out thinking he’s nuts on a lot of fronts. In this light, entrusting Kennedy with the nation’s health infrastructure not only risks breaking the first rule of medicine but could also undermine broader efforts to address the critical challenges facing the country. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-20

Trolling meme removed @connda

An essential undersea internet cable linking Finland to Germany has been severed, raising alarms about potential Russian involvement in the incident. The break occurred early Monday morning near Gotland, a Swedish island in the Baltic Sea, and has disrupted a critical communication link between Finland and central Europe. The Finnish state-owned data service provider, Cinia, announced the disruption and dispatched a repair ship to investigate the cause of the outage. Ari-Jussi Knaapila, the company’s chief executive, noted the unusual nature of such damage, stating, “At the moment, there is no way to assess the cause of the cable break, but such breaks without external impact do not happen in these waters.” Despite this, Knaapila acknowledged the possibility of accidental damage caused by human activity, such as a trawler or a ship deploying an emergency anchor. While Cinia emphasized there is no direct evidence pointing to sabotage, the situation has reignited security concerns in Finland, particularly in light of its recent NATO membership. The fibre optic cables, critical to international internet traffic, are typically protected by double-armored steel casings, making accidental damage uncommon. The disruption is unlikely to affect most internet users in Finland, as the country can redirect data traffic through other undersea cables. However, the symbolic significance of the incident has heightened tensions. Finland has been on heightened alert for potential espionage activities from Russia since its accession to NATO, ending a long-standing policy of neutrality. These concerns are not without context. NATO intelligence warned in September of Russia’s suspected efforts to strengthen a covert submarine unit capable of targeting undersea infrastructure. Dmitry Medvedev, Russia’s former president, further exacerbated fears by declaring undersea cables to be legitimate targets, referencing Western "complicity" in the destruction of the Nord Stream gas pipeline. As investigations continue, the severed cable serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities in Europe’s critical infrastructure and the growing risks of geopolitical tensions spilling into vital technological domains. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-19

Donald Trump Jr. has accused President Joe Biden of escalating global tensions in a deliberate attempt to provoke a major conflict before his father, President-elect Donald Trump, takes office. The claim follows reports that Biden authorized Ukraine to use long-range U.S.-made ATACMS missiles, capable of striking targets within Russia, in its ongoing war with Moscow. In a Sunday tweet, Trump Jr. alleged that Biden’s decision reflects the interests of the "Military Industrial Complex," which, he argued, is intent on igniting "World War 3" before his father assumes power in January. “The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives,” Trump Jr. stated. President-elect Donald Trump has claimed he will end the war in Ukraine shortly after taking office but has yet to provide specific details about how he plans to achieve this ambitious goal. In contrast, Biden’s decision to greenlight Ukraine’s use of ATACMS missiles has reportedly been framed as a strategic deterrent. According to Bloomberg, Biden authorized the action in part to dissuade North Korea from sending additional troops to Russia, amid speculation that Pyongyang could deploy up to 100,000 troops to bolster Russia's war effort. The ATACMS missiles, with a range of approximately 190 miles, provide Ukraine with the ability to strike deeper into Russian territory than ever before. This decision underscores the Biden administration’s ongoing support for Ukraine, even as it draws sharp criticism from some U.S. politicians and international leaders. Biden’s approach appears focused on maintaining pressure on Moscow while addressing emerging threats from alliances like the one between Russia and North Korea. However, critics, including Trump Jr., contend that such measures could have far-reaching and potentially catastrophic consequences. Trump Jr.’s comments highlight the divide between the Biden administration’s strategy and the rhetoric from the incoming Trump presidency. While Biden appears committed to bolstering Ukraine’s military capabilities, President-elect Trump has emphasized his intention to pursue peace, albeit without offering specifics on his proposed approach. As global tensions rise, the stakes remain high. The U.S.’s actions in Ukraine, North Korea’s involvement, and Russia’s responses continue to shape a conflict that shows no immediate signs of resolution. Based on a report by Daily Beast 2024-11-19

A disturbing investigation has uncovered how fraudulent asylum seekers exploit the UK's immigration system by falsely claiming to be from Eritrea, a war-torn East African country. Through brazen TikTok tutorials and other online platforms, individuals are openly coaching migrants to fabricate stories that secure them asylum in Britain, despite their true origins being far safer. The Mail's investigation reveals a growing network of thousands of individuals sharing resources on how to deceive Home Office officials. This includes detailed guides on Eritrean culture, geography, and traditions, designed to bolster false claims. The strategy exploits Eritrea’s exceptional 99% asylum approval rate, a figure driven by the nation’s reputation for severe human rights abuses. In one shocking instance, Ethiopian migrant Michaele Abraha, a London-based Uber driver, uses TikTok to boast about his asylum claim success. Abraha, who posts under the alias "Miki Abrere," openly admits he pretended to be Eritrean to gain refugee status in the UK. His account, with 16,000 followers, serves as a hub for guiding others in filing false asylum applications. Abraha's advice goes beyond cultural mimicry. He encourages migrants to claim they are minors to expedite their cases. In one TikTok session translated from Amharic, a language primarily spoken in Ethiopia, Abraha instructs viewers to "act like a child" by altering their behavior and appearance. For instance, he suggests allowing hair to grow longer to appear youthful and dressing in ways that might mislead authorities or hotel staff handling asylum seekers. Abraha also advises migrants on damage control if inconsistencies in their claims arise. In one instance, he reassures a migrant who feared exposure by suggesting they claim nervousness or miscommunication during interviews. Additionally, he recommends attending Eritrean community events and documenting interactions with Eritreans to lend credibility to their fabricated stories. Eritrea’s oppressive regime has earned the country the nickname "North Korea of Africa," due to policies like indefinite military conscription, forced labor, and systemic repression. This grim reality justifies the high asylum approval rate for genuine Eritrean refugees. However, Ethiopia, while not without its challenges, is significantly safer and even hosts over 800,000 refugees, many of them Eritreans fleeing their homeland. Robert Jenrick, the former Immigration Minister, described the findings as a "national security emergency." He criticized political opponents for not taking stronger measures to deter illegal migration, stating, "This is a national security emergency and the British public are rightly sick of it. It’s got to be stopped." The investigation identified multiple Ethiopians using similar deceptive methods. Some shared success stories in online communities, while others provided step-by-step guides, including how to destroy identifying documents and fabricate untraceable narratives. From 2010 to March 2024, nearly 35,000 asylum claims in the UK were attributed to Eritreans, a significant figure considering the country's population of 3.6 million. Between 2018 and 2024, Eritreans surpassed Syrians in approved asylum claims, despite Syria’s far larger population and ongoing civil war. Alp Mehmet, chairman of Migration Watch UK, criticized the laxity of the system, stating, "Make your way to the UK illegally, destroy anything that could identify you, make up a story that can’t be checked, and you’re home and dry. I dread to think how many in the backlog now being granted asylum or permission to stay have lied about who they are and where they’re from." The Home Office has pledged to investigate the allegations and revoke refugee status if it was obtained fraudulently. A spokesman emphasized, "We are fully committed to ensuring our asylum system is not open to abuse and protection is granted only to those who genuinely need it." Repeated attempts to contact Abraha for comment have gone unanswered. However, his TikTok activity and the growing network of similar schemes expose a critical vulnerability in the UK's asylum system, highlighting the urgent need for reform. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-19

Columbus, Ohio, witnessed a disturbing display of hatred on Saturday as a group of masked neo-Nazis marched through the city streets carrying swastika-emblazoned flags and shouting slurs through megaphones. Videos circulating on social media captured the agitators—about a dozen men dressed in black and wearing red masks—parading through the Short North area, a popular arts and entertainment district, in the early afternoon. The Anti-Defamation League Center on Extremism characterized the march as part of a growing trend of white supremacist displays across the United States over the past 18 months. Oren Segal, speaking to *The New York Times*, said, “At the end of the day, they want to create fear and anxiety in communities and get a photo op.” Ohio Governor Mike DeWine strongly condemned the march, taking to social media to denounce the actions of the group. “We will not tolerate hate in Ohio,” he stated. “Neo-Nazis—their faces hidden behind red masks—roamed streets in Columbus today, carrying Nazi flags and spewing vile and racist speech against people of color and Jews. There were reports that they were also espousing white power sentiments. There is no place in this state for hate, bigotry, antisemitism, or violence, and we must denounce it wherever we see it.” Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein also expressed his outrage, addressing the group directly in a statement shared on social media: “To those involved in the neo-Nazi march in the Short North today, take your flags and the masks you hide behind and go home and never come back. Your hate isn’t welcome in our city.” The march and the subsequent public backlash highlight ongoing concerns about the resurgence of white supremacist activity in the United States, raising questions about how best to address such displays of hate and protect communities from fear and division. Based on a report by Newsweek 2024-11-19

The Labour government is preparing to implement a strategy inspired by Italy’s approach to managing illegal migration, with plans to form agreements with countries like Kurdistan, Vietnam, and Turkey. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is leading the initiative, aiming to replicate the Italian model of providing financial aid to foreign governments in exchange for their efforts to prevent migrants from embarking on dangerous journeys to the UK. The deals are expected to be finalized by the year’s end. These plans follow Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose government has significantly reduced the number of migrants arriving by boat. Italy achieved a 62% drop in arrivals during the first seven months of 2024, supported by financial agreements with countries like Tunisia and Libya. These agreements include investments in border security and coastguard training, as well as broader incentives like support for local businesses, education, and renewable energy projects. The UK’s proposed deals will include similar elements, tailored to specific countries. Kurdistan, identified as a key origin point for people-smuggling networks, is a priority. Earlier this year, a notorious smuggler operating from the Kurdistani city of Sulaymaniyah was arrested, highlighting the region’s central role in the illicit trade. Informal discussions between the UK and Kurdistan’s security services have already taken place to explore measures to disrupt these networks. Vietnam is another focal point, as its nationals accounted for 10% of small boat arrivals in the year leading up to June. Labour is revisiting an earlier Tory-led agreement involving targeted social media campaigns to deter potential migrants. The campaign includes testimonials from individuals deceived by smugglers, aiming to counter misleading claims about life in the UK. While Labour's overarching goal is to combat people-smuggling and reduce Channel crossings, it faces criticism from humanitarian groups concerned about the ethical implications of these deals. For instance, similar agreements with Tunisia and Libya have been condemned for pushing migrants into detention centers where reports of abuse and torture are common. Despite these challenges, the urgency for action remains high. Small boat crossings have surged, with 32,900 individuals arriving in the UK by November 11, surpassing the 2023 total of 29,437. Labour’s plans also involve strengthening the UK’s capability to deport migrants without legal grounds to stay. More than 25 return flights have been conducted since July, sending individuals back to countries like Albania, Poland, Vietnam, and even Timor-Leste. A key component of Labour’s strategy involves collaboration with local law enforcement in partner countries. This includes providing training to dismantle smuggling networks and bolster border security. Recent successes include the arrest of a Turkish national accused of supplying boats and engines to smugglers in northern France. The operation, conducted by the UK’s National Crime Agency in cooperation with Dutch and Belgian authorities, underscores the importance of international partnerships in addressing illegal migration. Labour leaders emphasize the need for “pragmatic” solutions, with Starmer highlighting the benefits of addressing migration at its source rather than reacting to arrivals. However, these plans are not without controversy. Critics question whether financial incentives to foreign governments can truly deter migration without exacerbating human rights concerns. As Cooper’s team works to finalize these deals, the balance between reducing illegal migration and maintaining ethical standards remains a contentious issue. Based on a report by The Times & Sunday Times 2024-11-19

The escalating frustrations among UK farmers over proposed inheritance tax reforms have led to a call for protests in London this week. Unlike their French counterparts, who are known for their militant demonstrations, British farmers are planning peaceful marches and discussions—at least for now. However, organizers warn that if the government refuses to reconsider its controversial tax plans, the protests could take a more confrontational turn. The proposed policy, set to take effect in April 2026, imposes a 20% inheritance tax on farming assets valued at over £1 million, with allowances raising the threshold to £3 million. For many family-run farms, this represents a significant financial burden. Farmers like Clive Bailye, who runs The Farming Forum website, say this “impossible tax” forces families to sell off their land to meet the tax bill. Bailye estimates he would owe £450,000 for his parents’ farm, an increase of £60,000 from the current rate. “The only way I could possibly pay that is by selling the farm,” he said, emphasizing the emotional and economic toll such policies impose on family farms. Tuesday’s protests will consist of two distinct actions: a union-led effort where nearly 2,000 farmers are set to meet MPs across Westminster, and a family-oriented march through London’s streets. Organizers have stressed the importance of maintaining a respectful and peaceful atmosphere, asking participants to “leave no mark” other than food bank donations. Bailye described the march as a “family thing,” featuring children pedaling mini-tractors at the forefront. However, tensions are simmering beneath the surface. Bailye expressed concern that more militant farmers might adopt tactics akin to those seen in France, where farmers recently blocked motorways and dumped manure to express their dissatisfaction with government policies. “There are other groups of farmers who, for want of a better word, want to get more French,” he said, adding that such actions could tarnish the farming industry’s reputation. Police have already issued warnings against disruptive protests, making it clear that using tractors to block roads would result in arrests. Oliver Harrison, an arable farmer and one of the march’s organizers, noted that some farmers are eager to take such measures. However, he has urged protesters to focus on communicating their plight. “We don’t want to be in headlines because farmers are rioting,” Harrison said. “We want to be in the headlines explaining that we feed people and [the tax increase] is taking away that ability.” National Farmers Union (NFU) President Tom Bradshaw echoed these sentiments, urging farmers to bring the values of “trust, respect, and family” to London. He described the day as a chance for rural communities to showcase their concerns without disrupting the capital. Bradshaw criticized the government for underestimating the human impact of these reforms, particularly on elderly farmers who cannot benefit from seven-year gifting rules. “If you’re in the twilight years and you don’t expect to live for seven years, that creates a really, really difficult position,” he said. Only farms worth more than £1 million will be subject to the new inheritance tax rate. That might sound like a lot, but according to Bailye, £1 million won’t get you very far in modern farming. “The working capital involved in running a viable farm is £5-10 million. A tractor is £250,000 now. A combine harvester is £500,000. A milking parlour £1 million, grain stores £500,000. A farm house might be £500,000, or if you’re in the Cotswolds it could be worth a couple of million. “On paper, [some farmers] are extremely wealthy people because they’ve got this £10 million asset. But for many farms the return on capital is 0.5 per cent or less. If you walked into Dragon’s Den with a business idea saying ‘I’d like you to invest £10 million and I’ll give you 0.5 per cent return’, they’d laugh you out the door. So as a way to make money it doesn’t make sense. It’s not about that, it’s about a lifestyle.” Based on a report by the Times & Sunday Times 2024-11-19

Last week, The Guardian, a cornerstone of left-leaning media, announced its departure from Twitter, or X as it’s now known, marking a symbolic moment in the shifting dynamics of social media. “The US presidential election campaign served only to underline what we have considered for too long,” the paper declared, “that X is a toxic media platform and that its owner, Elon Musk, has been able to use its influence to shape political discourse.” The Guardian's withdrawal from Twitter is just the latest chapter in what has been a turbulent time for the publication. From counseling its staff after Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory to grappling with a global political shift to the right, the paper has found itself navigating a world increasingly at odds with its ideological leanings. The same UK government The Guardian once cheered into power is now implementing policies that it strongly opposes, from changes in education to agricultural reforms. The platform itself has changed dramatically since Elon Musk took over. Where leftist voices once dominated, the platform now leans more conservative, a transformation that hasn’t gone unnoticed. The departure of The Guardian—and even the Clifton Suspension Bridge’s Twitter account—underscores how Musk’s ownership has reshaped the platform’s character. The bridge’s social media team announced its own exit, humorously leaving users to ponder how such a decision might have rattled Musk himself. For some, Twitter has always been a microcosm of modern social dynamics, a space where vanity and debate intertwine. It’s a digital stage for self-expression, righteous indignation, and at times, outright vitriol. Critics argue that social media, Twitter included, has done little to enhance public discourse and much to foster division, bullying, and performative outrage. The Guardian's decision raises questions about where its audience and other left-leaning individuals will turn. Platforms like Facebook and Instagram still host The Guardian’s content, but they, too, come with their own controversies and limitations. Yet the issue remains: without a common battleground like Twitter, can those on the left find a new venue to engage their ideological adversaries? Meanwhile, conservatives and right-leaning voices seem content to remain on Twitter, where they enjoy what they perceive as newfound freedom from relentless self-righteous critiques. With their critics leaving en masse, the dynamics of the platform may further shift, creating a space more homogeneous in thought and tone. For now, the question lingers: where will these “poor lambs” go to bleat? Will they find a new haven where they can engage in the debates they once relished on Twitter, or will their absence leave them out of the fray entirely? One thing is certain—social media’s influence on political discourse is far from over, and its evolution continues to mirror the changing tides of society itself. Based on a report by The Daily Telegraph 2024-11-19

Kanye West, the rapper and producer also known as Ye, has been accused of making antisemitic remarks about his ex-wife Kim Kardashian in a lawsuit filed Thursday. The complaint alleges that West told an employee that Kardashian had “Jewish masters,” among other controversial statements. The plaintiff, Murphy Aficionado, began working as a project manager for West in October 2022. His role involved overseeing various construction projects. According to the lawsuit, Aficionado was not paid for his work during the first five months of his employment and was subjected to a hostile work environment. The suit claims West frequently delivered “racist lectures” and indulged in antisemitic conspiracy theories. Aficionado specifically alleges that West stated, “The Jews are out to get me. They froze my bank account. The Jews got Kim and my kids… The Jews convinced Kim. She has Jewish masters.” These comments, according to the suit, were part of a pattern of discriminatory and offensive behavior. The lawsuit also details other troubling incidents during Aficionado’s tenure. On two separate occasions, West allegedly left Aficionado waiting while he loudly engaged in sexual activity in a nearby room. Aficionado’s employment ended in July 2023 when he was informed that Donda Academy, a private school founded by West, would be shutting down. This lawsuit is one of several filed against West by former employees this year. In June, Lauren Pisciotta, a former assistant, accused him of sexual harassment and wrongful termination. Pisciotta later amended her lawsuit in October, alleging that West had drugged and sexually assaulted her without her consent. Additionally, a former “director of intelligence” employed by West sued him in October, claiming that he was tasked with investigating Kardashian and tracking West’s wife, Bianca Censori, while she was on vacation. These lawsuits paint a troubling picture of West’s alleged behavior, with accusations ranging from exploitation and harassment to antisemitic and offensive remarks. As legal proceedings continue, the claims against the rapper add to the controversies that have surrounded him in recent years. Based on a report by Variety 2024-11-19

Muslim Americans who supported Donald Trump in protest against the Biden administration’s policies on the Israel-Gaza conflict have expressed deep disappointment in his pro-Israel cabinet selections. Trump’s decisions to nominate key officials known for their staunch support of Israel have left many feeling betrayed, especially given the promises of peace and stability that had drawn their votes. “We are very disappointed,” said Rexhinaldo Nazarko, executive director of the American Muslim Engagement and Empowerment Network (AMEEN). “It seems like this administration has been packed entirely with neoconservatives and extremely pro-Israel, pro-war people, which is a failure on the side of President Trump, to the pro-peace and anti-war movement.” Key appointments include Senator Marco Rubio, who was chosen as Secretary of State. Rubio, a vocal supporter of Israel, recently rejected calls for a ceasefire in Gaza, asserting that Israel should destroy “every element” of Hamas. Trump also selected former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee as Ambassador to Israel. Huckabee, a conservative who has consistently backed Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, has dismissed the viability of a two-state solution, calling it “unworkable.” Another controversial pick is Representative Elise Stefanik, nominated as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Stefanik has criticized the UN as a “cesspool of antisemitism” for its condemnation of civilian deaths in Gaza. These appointments signal a clear alignment with pro-Israel policies, a stark contrast to the expectations of many Muslim voters who supported Trump in hopes of achieving peace in the Middle East. Rabiul Chowdhury, a Philadelphia investor and co-founder of Muslims for Trump, said the Muslim vote had been pivotal in Trump’s victories in swing states like Michigan. “Trump won because of us, and we’re not happy with his secretary of state pick and others,” Chowdhury said. Others feel even more disillusioned. Hassan Abdel Salam, co-founder of the Abandon Harris campaign, described Trump’s staffing as more extreme than anticipated. “It’s like he’s going on Zionist overdrive,” he said. “We were always extremely skeptical...but it does look like our community has been played.” Many Trump allies who initially engaged with Muslim and Arab American communities, such as Richard Grenell and Massad Boulos, had promised that Trump would be a president committed to peace. Grenell, a former acting director of national intelligence, was even touted as a possible Secretary of State during campaign outreach efforts. However, his absence from a key role in the administration has only deepened skepticism. Despite the cabinet appointments, some Trump supporters remain hopeful. Bill Bazzi, mayor of Dearborn Heights, Michigan, who endorsed Trump, stated, “I still believe he will work to end the war, despite the cabinet appointments.” Rola Makki, vice chair for outreach of the Michigan Republican Party, echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that the ultimate outcome of Trump’s policies would matter most. “What people need to realize is that there are 50,000 dead Palestinians and 3,000 dead Lebanese, and that’s happened during the current administration,” she said. While Trump’s campaign did not respond to requests for comment, the discontent among his Muslim supporters underscores the growing tensions between promises made during his campaign and the reality of his policy choices. Many in the Muslim and Arab American communities feel the need to continue advocating for peace while grappling with the sense of betrayal. As Nazarko pointed out, “At least we’re on the map.” Based on a report by Reuters 2024-11-19

As Donald Trump prepares to assume the presidency once more, the Justice Department (DOJ) and the FBI are bracing for an era of political retribution. Legal experts and insiders believe that Trump’s nomination of staunch ally Matt Gaetz as attorney general signals a determined effort to consolidate control over the DOJ and pursue investigations against his perceived adversaries. Multiple current and former DOJ and FBI officials, fearing criminal investigations, have begun consulting lawyers, a move reflecting their heightened concerns. "Everything we did was aboveboard," stated a former senior FBI official anonymously, though they expect to be targeted regardless. They anticipate costly legal battles and potential congressional investigations as part of a broader strategy by Trump loyalists. Gaetz’s selection has amplified these fears. The former congressman, who faced but was not charged in a federal sex trafficking investigation, is seen by many as an enforcer of Trump’s agenda. A former DOJ official remarked, “He needs to be able to control the department, which he can do through a loyal AG beholden to him.” They added that Gaetz’s own vulnerabilities ensure his loyalty to Trump, who retains the power to protect him through potential pardons. The fear among DOJ and FBI officials stems from Trump’s consistent portrayal of their prior investigations as politically motivated. His spokesperson, Steven Cheung, dismissed all criminal charges against Trump as partisan attacks, calling for their dismissal. Legal experts view the looming investigations into Justice Department officials as a method to intimidate those who dare to scrutinize Trump’s actions. Stephen Gillers, an ethics professor at New York University, said, “Trump aims to neutralize sources of power that may impede him. That includes the law and legal institutions. He will tolerate no interference when the department’s decisions will benefit Trump and his allies or when its power can be deployed to retaliate against his enemies.” Inside the DOJ, morale has plummeted. Following Trump’s unexpected election victory, officials expressed shock and dismay, some even weeping at the prospect of his return to power. Attorney General Merrick Garland had sought to restore nonpartisan norms within the DOJ, but Trump's victory dashed those efforts. Despite Trump’s claims of corruption within the DOJ, officials maintain that their investigations, including federal charges related to Trump’s handling of classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election, were conducted properly. “There’s no crime,” said one law enforcement official, puzzled by the allegations against them. However, conservative lawyer Mike Davis and others argue that DOJ officials, including special counsel Jack Smith, could be prosecuted under laws like “conspiracy against rights.” Critics dismiss such theories as baseless. Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, stated, “I think that’s absurd. I don’t see any legitimate charge that can be brought against Smith.” Legal experts warn, though, that investigations can unearth unrelated minor infractions. A special prosecutor, for instance, might find violations involving taxes or other offenses during broader probes. This tactic was evident during past investigations: Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, faced convictions unrelated to the original Russia inquiry, while Special Counsel John Durham’s examination of the 2016 election netted only a single guilty plea for an unrelated matter. For those targeted, the financial toll can be devastating. Many DOJ and FBI officials now face the prospect of exorbitant legal fees, adding to the personal and professional costs of becoming entangled in politically motivated investigations. Gillers noted that Trump’s nomination of Gaetz marks only the beginning of this strategy. “Elevating Gaetz is in part payback for Jack Smith’s two indictments,” he said. “The Justice Department is Trump’s white whale, and like Captain Ahab, Trump is determined to get even.” As the DOJ prepares for a turbulent future, the implications for the rule of law and the independence of legal institutions remain uncertain, raising questions about the durability of democratic norms in an era of escalating political vengeance. Based on a report by NBC News 2024-11-19

Copy and paste post removed from an unapproved blog @Hakuna Matata

Doctors, vicars, and other professionals across Britain have been implicated in investigations into non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs), raising questions about the boundaries of free expression and the role of law enforcement in addressing societal tensions. NCHIs, designed to address behavior motivated by hostility toward protected characteristics, have been recorded in cases ranging from personal grievances to professional disputes. Police forces responding to freedom of information requests revealed that incidents have been logged against individuals performing their professional duties. For instance, a doctor faced accusations of hate after allegedly misdiagnosing a patient, while a vicar was labeled a suspect for declaring that being gay was sinful. A notable incident involved a person reporting a hate complaint after being called a “sheep shagger,” a derogatory term for a Welsh individual, and another where someone asked if a Chinese meal came “with bats.” According to guidance, NCHIs should address actions with a clear intent of hostility and the potential to escalate into significant harm or criminal behavior. However, concerns have arisen about the apparent misuse of such measures. Jake Hurfurt, from the privacy advocacy group Big Brother Watch, commented, “Time and time again we are seeing evidence of questionable non-crime hate incidents being recorded by police. Interpersonal squabbles have no place in police records, and forces devalue the concept of real hate crime when they spend time on thousands of these unnecessary reports.” The issue has been compounded by reports that children and journalists have also been subjects of NCHIs. For example, a nine-year-old girl was investigated for calling a classmate a derogatory term, and a journalist was reported for referring to an interview subject as “deaf and dumb.” Some police forces, such as West Yorkshire Police, have defended their approach, emphasizing a commitment to record every incident of alleged hate, regardless of whether it meets the threshold of criminality. In one case, a person claimed their bisexuality led to a misdiagnosis, and another individual alleged discrimination after being denied a spot on a course due to autism. A spokesperson for West Yorkshire Police stated that officers apply their judgment to determine hostility toward protected groups. Humberside Police also recorded an NCHI involving a vicar who allegedly caused distress by stating that being gay was sinful. The force stated it carefully assesses each case, considering vulnerabilities and risks while maintaining a "common-sense and proportionate approach." Other examples revealed by The Times include reports of a social worker accused of racially discriminating against a parent and failing to deliver gifts to children, and a pub incident where a transgender individual alleged they were targeted when asked to leave after being accused of inappropriate behavior. Critics argue that some incidents stretch the purpose of NCHIs. In Norfolk, a man’s comment about “sheep shagger” was logged, while Humberside recorded a hate incident involving a remark about bats and Chinese food. In South Wales, a lesbian couple believed a dead rat on their doorstep was a targeted act, despite the commonality of rats in the area. Surrey Police defended an NCHI where a couple was asked to leave a pub after allegations of inappropriate behavior, asserting that it was justified due to the transgender identity of one individual. In another case, a West Yorkshire woman reported an NCHI after finding a dead pigeon outside her home, linking it to prior harassment. The growing prevalence of NCHIs—13,200 recorded across 45 police forces in the year ending June 2023—has prompted calls for reform. Updated guidance from former Home Secretary Suella Braverman aims to raise the threshold for such reports. As the debate continues, balancing the protection of free expression and addressing genuine hate remains a contentious challenge for law enforcement. Based on a report by The Times & Sunday Times 2024-11-18

A woman has testified to a House Ethics Committee panel that she witnessed former Congressman Matt Gaetz engaging in sexual activity with a minor during a Florida house party in 2017, according to her attorney, Joel Leppard. The explosive allegation, disclosed Friday, has reignited scrutiny around Gaetz, despite a prior Justice Department investigation that did not result in criminal charges. “My client testified to the House Ethics Committee that she witnessed Rep. Gaetz having sex with a minor at a house party in Orlando in 2017,” Leppard told NBC News. The lawyer, representing two witnesses in the case, called for transparency and urged the committee to release its findings on allegations of sexual misconduct. “The American people deserve to know the truth about the person slated to become the top law enforcement officer in the country,” Leppard added, referencing Gaetz’s recent nomination by former President Donald Trump to lead the Department of Justice (DOJ). A spokesperson for Gaetz dismissed the allegations, pointing to the Justice Department's decision not to pursue charges. “Merrick Garland’s DOJ cleared Matt Gaetz and didn’t charge him. Are you alleging Garland is part of a cover-up?” the spokesman stated, emphasizing that the previous investigation concluded without criminal findings. The claims against Gaetz have resurfaced following a report by ABC News that a central figure in the DOJ's earlier sex trafficking investigation testified before the Ethics Committee, alleging that Gaetz had a sexual relationship with her when she was 17 years old. The woman, now in her 20s, was subpoenaed by the ethics panel over the summer and testified about the alleged encounter. Despite the DOJ’s decision not to bring charges last year, the House Ethics Committee continued its own probe into Gaetz's conduct. However, Gaetz’s abrupt resignation from Congress on Wednesday—following his nomination by Trump to lead the DOJ—has complicated the investigation. By stepping down, the 42-year-old is no longer under the jurisdiction of the Ethics Committee, effectively halting the inquiry and preventing the release of its findings. “These allegations are invented and would constitute false testimony to Congress,” Gaetz said in a statement responding to the accusations. “This false smear following a three-year criminal investigation should be viewed with great skepticism.” The decision to end the probe without releasing its conclusions has drawn criticism, with several senators calling for the Ethics Committee’s report to be made public before deliberations on Gaetz’s confirmation to the cabinet post proceed. The controversy surrounding his nomination underscores the broader tension over the allegations and the lingering questions about Gaetz’s past conduct. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-18

In a strike at the end of October, Israel targeted and destroyed an active nuclear weapons research facility in Iran, according to sources from the U.S. and Israeli governments. The attack, which focused on the Taleghan 2 facility within the Parchin military complex, dealt a severe blow to Iran's covert efforts to resume nuclear weapons development. Israeli and U.S. officials have stated that this operation disrupted a significant part of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The Parchin complex, located roughly 20 miles southeast of Tehran, had long been associated with Iran's Amad nuclear weapons program, which officially ceased in 2003. However, recent intelligence suggested renewed activities at Taleghan 2, a site previously thought to be inactive. A former Israeli official revealed that the strike obliterated advanced equipment essential for designing plastic explosives used to trigger a nuclear device. High-resolution satellite images confirmed that the facility had been completely destroyed. This renewed nuclear activity reportedly included computer modeling, metallurgy, and explosive research — processes that could be applied to the development of nuclear weapons while also being framed as civilian scientific research. “They conducted scientific activity that could lay the ground for the production of a nuclear weapon,” a U.S. official explained, emphasizing the secretive nature of the research, known only to a small faction within the Iranian government. Iran has consistently denied pursuing nuclear weapons. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated this stance, stating unequivocally, “Iran is not after nuclear weapons, period.” Despite these denials, Israeli and U.S. intelligence began tracking suspicious activities at Parchin earlier this year. In June, U.S. officials privately warned Iran about the activities but saw no signs of compliance. By late October, the situation had escalated. The attack on Taleghan 2 was strategically timed. Israeli officials reportedly selected the site as part of their retaliation for Iran’s massive missile attack on October 1. U.S. President Joe Biden had cautioned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, warning of the potential for sparking a larger conflict. However, the Israelis pressed forward, targeting a site that Iran had not declared under its nuclear program. This strategic choice meant that Iran could not openly acknowledge the attack without admitting to violations of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. “This strike sent a clear message that the Israelis have deep insights into Iran's secret operations, even those known to only a few within their government,” said a U.S. official. The fallout from this strike is expected to have international repercussions. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will convene next week to vote on a resolution censuring Iran for its lack of cooperation with the UN’s nuclear watchdog. Tehran has hinted that it might respond by limiting its cooperation with the agency. The Taleghan 2 strike highlights the high-stakes power struggle over nuclear capabilities in the region. While Iran denies any intent to develop nuclear weapons, this event underscores the vigilance and determination of Israeli and U.S. intelligence in countering perceived threats to global security. Based on a report by AXIOS 2024-11-18

The investigation into journalist Allison Pearson has sparked a wave of support among female journalists, who warn they could face similar scrutiny over their work or social media posts. Pearson, a columnist for *The Telegraph*, is currently under investigation by three police forces for a now-deleted tweet. The controversy has ignited broader discussions about freedom of expression and the role of the police in regulating speech. On Remembrance Sunday, Pearson was visited at her home by Essex Police. They informed her of a complaint related to her tweet but declined to provide details about the alleged offense or the identity of the complainant. This incident has drawn criticism from fellow journalists, including *Daily Mail* columnist Sarah Vine, who described the situation as a "frightening moment for press freedom." Vine remarked on the pressures faced by journalists, particularly women, saying: “Journalists, and especially female journalists, are used to receiving a lot of abuse. It’s not easy, but it comes with the territory. We console ourselves with the thought that the police and responsible authorities have our back. What has happened to @AllisonPearson has shown that is no longer true. It’s a frightening moment for press freedom. The fact that @Keir_Starmer seems okay with it is even more chilling.” *Daily Mail* journalist Rachel Johnson, the sister of former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, echoed these concerns. Sharing an article written by her brother in Pearson’s defense, she stated: “Hear hear – and so say all of us standing with @AllisonPearson. They messed with the wrong Welshwoman this time, but any one of us could be next.” The investigation centers on whether Pearson’s tweet constituted a Non-Crime Hate Incident (NCHI) or violated the Malicious Communications Act. Although NCHIs are not criminal offenses, they are recorded by police. Essex Police recently clarified that Pearson is now being investigated under section 17 of the Public Order Act for allegedly stirring up racial hatred with a post made in November last year. The controversy has prompted a government review of how police handle NCHIs. Donna Jones, the former chair of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, criticized the approach, arguing that police should not be engaging with individuals unless a crime has been committed. “The police should not be going to somebody’s home if they have not committed a crime,” Jones stated. She added, “If it is a non-crime, it should stop there. Yes, collect the data, feed it into the Home Office, but going further only wastes police resources.” The sentiment was shared by Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Conservative Party, who told *The Telegraph*: “We need to stop this behavior of people wasting police time on trivial incidents because they don’t like something, as if they’re in a nursery.” Other politicians, including Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, and Suella Braverman, former home secretary, have voiced similar frustrations with the policing of speech. Renowned barrister Geoffrey Robertson KC also criticized the investigation, calling it “a waste of public money.” The incident, he suggested, illustrates the need for a reassessment of priorities in policing. As the debate over Pearson’s case continues, the outpouring of support highlights concerns among female journalists about the implications for press freedom. “Any one of us could be next,” Rachel Johnson warned, a sentiment that resonates widely in a profession increasingly under scrutiny for expressing contentious views. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-18

A 19-year-old woman, employed as a Sunday school teacher, allegedly sought the position to encourage children to embrace extremist ideologies, the Old Bailey was told. The defendant, Dzhamilya Timaeva, reportedly used her role to instill beliefs about waging jihad, including distributing a cartoon book titled *Little Muwahideen*, which prosecutors say glorified holy war against non-believers. The court heard that Timaeva was the head teacher at the Windsor Muslim Association and had been preparing to teach at the Tawheed Islamic Education Centre in Maidenhead. She had created lesson plans and a curriculum for the school and ordered 70 copies of the *Little Muwahideen* book, which were delivered to her home in Windsor, just a mile from Windsor Castle. The book, designed for children, emphasized the "duty" of waging war in Islam, the jury was told. Prosecutor Gareth Weetman argued that Timaeva’s actions reflected a broader intent to spread extremist ideologies. He stated: "This is a case about extremism. In simple terms, it is the prosecution case that Dzhamilya Timaeva had extremist beliefs and wanted to encourage others to share those beliefs. The defendant saw it as her duty to teach these extremist beliefs to young children. In order to do so, she obtained a place as a teacher at an Islamic Sunday school." Mr. Weetman emphasized that Timaeva had actively implemented her plans by September 2022, teaching children with the objective of promoting the idea that waging war against non-believers was integral to Islam. "This was all part of her plan to spread to others not just the furtherance of Islamic belief but that part of Islam is waging war against those who do not believe in Islam," he said. Timaeva was arrested at Heathrow Airport while attempting to board a flight to Turkey. Upon searching her iPhone, investigators found a video on her Telegram account titled *Incite the Believers*, which reportedly urged viewers to carry out arson attacks in the West. Additional materials found on her devices included a document on the "permissibility of suicidal operations" and a note titled *The Woman I Want to Be*, which included aspirations of raising children to become soldiers for Allah. The prosecution also revealed videos supporting ISIS, the extremist organization that once controlled large swaths of Syria and Iraq, were stored on Timaeva’s phone. Mr. Weetman added, “Police discovered several videos in support of ISIS, highlighting her extremist views and intent.” Timaeva, who has been released on bail, denies charges of disseminating terrorist documents and possessing materials for terrorist purposes between October 2022 and February 2023. Her trial is ongoing. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-18

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has issued a formal apology to survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care homes, addressing a scandal that has left a deep scar on the nation’s history. Speaking in parliament, Luxon acknowledged the immense suffering endured by an estimated 200,000 children and vulnerable adults who were subjected to abuse between 1950 and 2019. "I make this apology to all survivors on behalf of my own and previous governments," Luxon declared solemnly. "It was horrific. It was heartbreaking. It was wrong. And it should never have happened. For many of you, it changed the course of your life, and for that, the government must take responsibility." The apology follows a six-year inquiry described by Luxon as the largest and most complex public investigation ever undertaken in New Zealand. It involved interviews with over 2,300 survivors and documented an extensive array of abuses, including rape, forced sterilisation, and child labour. The report also revealed that faith-based care institutions often had higher rates of sexual abuse than state-run facilities. In many cases, abusers were shielded by religious and civil leaders who moved them to new locations, denying accountability and prolonging the victims' quest for justice. Tragically, many survivors did not live to see their stories validated. The findings have been a harrowing vindication for survivors who fought for decades to expose the abuse and overcome systemic denial. Tupua Urlich, a Māori survivor who shared his testimony during the inquiry, expressed that the apology alone is insufficient. “The effects of that trauma came through later on in life,” Urlich told the BBC. “It’s not just the physical abuse; it was the disconnection from my family, from my culture.” Urlich questioned whether the apology would translate into meaningful action. "Justice? No, not yet... These words are nothing unless they're followed by action, and the right kind of action that is informed by survivors. The government have proven that alone they're not trusted, nor capable, of providing the sort of change and service that we need." The abuse disproportionately affected Māori and Pacific communities, as well as individuals with mental or physical disabilities, compounding existing inequities. Survivors and advocates are now calling for comprehensive reforms to the care system, coupled with a robust restitution framework. While the government has pledged systemic reform, details of a compensation scheme are not expected until early next year. Luxon's apology, though historic, is seen by many as merely the beginning of a long-overdue reckoning with the failures of New Zealand’s care systems. Survivors and their supporters continue to demand justice, ensuring that the apology is not merely symbolic but a foundation for real and lasting change. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-18

Britain should align its trade priorities with the United States rather than the European Union's "socialist model," according to Stephen Moore, a senior economic adviser to Donald Trump. Moore's comments come as the former president-elect considers policies that could include sweeping tariffs, potentially sparking global trade tensions and significantly impacting the UK economy. Moore, speaking from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, Florida, suggested the US would be "less interested" in pursuing a free trade agreement with Britain if it moves toward closer alignment with the EU. "I’ve always said that Britain has to decide — do you want to go towards the European socialist model or do you want to go towards the US free market? Lately, it seems like they are shifting more in a European model, and so if that’s the case, I think we’d be less interested in having [a free trade deal]," he stated. The UK’s trade relationship with the EU remains a critical issue. Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has prioritized negotiating closer ties with Brussels, aiming to bolster economic growth. Similarly, Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, recently emphasized the need to rebuild trade relations with the EU, arguing that Brexit had weighed on the UK economy. Labour has proposed easing post-Brexit checks on goods crossing the Channel and securing EU recognition of UK professional qualifications. Moore noted that Trump’s proposed tariffs — as high as 20% on imports generally and up to 60% on goods from China — reflect his mandate to revitalize American manufacturing and create jobs. While tariffs could trigger a global trade war, Moore argued they might also "shift production more to domestic" industries, stating, "I’m a free trader, but the public agrees with Trump, and so I think we will see tariffs." Trump himself recently declared that “tariffs” were “the most beautiful word in the dictionary.” The potential implications for Britain are substantial. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research has estimated that Trump’s tariff policies could halve the UK’s GDP growth, creating a £21.5 billion shortfall in the country’s tax and spending plans while driving inflation up by 3 to 4 percentage points. While the EU has prepared retaliatory tariffs targeting iconic American goods like Levi’s jeans and Harley Davidson motorcycles, the UK is unlikely to follow suit, fearing escalation. Instead, ministers are reportedly seeking a carve-out from US tariffs. A free trade deal between the US and UK remains a contentious issue. Boris Johnson’s government previously pursued such an agreement during Trump’s administration, but talks stalled over disputes regarding American agricultural standards. Current Labour leadership, including Chancellor Rachel Reeves, has ruled out allowing imports of chlorine-washed chicken or hormone-treated beef, emphasizing, "We are not going to allow British farmers to be undercut by different rules and regulations in other countries." Moore, who has warmed to Trump’s protectionist rhetoric, explained the strategy: "What he’s talking about is using — he put it very well — raising taxes on things made in China, Mexico, and Europe but lowering taxes on things made here." He acknowledged concerns about trade wars but echoed Trump’s sentiment that such conflicts already exist in practice. Lord Mandelson, a contender for the role of British ambassador to Washington, has advocated for a pragmatic approach. He suggested the UK pursue a limited agreement focusing on digital services and technology. Meanwhile, Lord Darroch, a former British ambassador to the US, predicted that Trump would act decisively on tariffs, leveraging them to demand concessions from trading partners. As the UK navigates its post-Brexit trade strategy, the choice between closer ties with the EU or the US looms large, with significant economic and political consequences tied to either path. Based on a report by the Times and Sunday Times 2024-11-18

The magnetic North Pole, a crucial element of navigation systems worldwide, is shifting toward Russia in an unprecedented manner, as revealed by new data from the British Geological Survey (BGS). While the pole's movement is not new, its current behavior and pace have intrigued scientists. In the northern hemisphere, compass needles point to the magnetic North Pole, a location shaped by the Earth's ever-changing magnetic field. Unlike the geographic North Pole, which remains stationary at the convergence of longitude lines, the magnetic pole has been in constant motion. Historically, it meandered near northern Canada’s coast but began accelerating toward Siberia in the 1990s. From 1600 to 1990, the pole moved approximately six miles annually. That rate surged to 34 miles per year in the 2000s, only to slow to 22 miles per year in the past five years—a deceleration that scientists have never recorded before. The findings come from the BGS, which collaborates with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to maintain the World Magnetic Model. Updated every five years, this model predicts the pole’s location and underpins technologies ranging from smartphone compass tools to military navigation systems. William Brown, a global geomagnetic field modeller at the BGS, emphasized its significance, stating, “Planes, boats, submarines, you name it, it’s in there.” The pole’s movement originates deep within the Earth, where molten iron churns in the planet's outer core. This liquid iron, driven by heat escaping from the core, generates the Earth’s magnetic field. Variations in the swirling patterns, roughly 2,000 miles below the surface, influence the magnetic field’s strength and the pole’s position. Describing this dynamic process, Brown compared it to a “giant cup of tea,” noting that the molten outer core has the viscosity of water and is in constant motion. Monitoring these shifts, however, remains complex. When Sir James Clark Ross, a Royal Navy officer and polar explorer, first located the magnetic pole in 1831, he relied on a magnetic needle that pointed directly downward. Today, the BGS employs advanced technology, using satellites and a network of ground stations to observe and map the Earth’s magnetic field. This data sheds light on the behavior of the molten core and its impact on the pole’s location. Professor Phil Livermore from the University of Leeds has offered an explanation for the pole’s unusual recent activity. He describes it as a “tug-of-war” between two magnetic patches—one beneath Canada and another under Siberia. Livermore explained that the Canadian patch seems to have stretched and split, slightly increasing the relative strength of the Siberian patch. This imbalance likely accounts for the pole’s gradual shift toward Russia. While predicting the future behavior of the magnetic North Pole remains elusive, the ongoing monitoring by scientists ensures a better understanding of these complex processes, which are vital for navigation and technology worldwide. Based on a report by the Times and Sunday Times 2024-11-18