Social Media

For decades, Israel has faced a grim reality: terror attacks perpetrated by extremists who seek to instill fear through violence. Yet, despite the gravity of these actions, such horrors often find a disturbing chorus of applause among certain groups in the West. College campuses and protest movements in cities like New York have echoed sentiments that effectively endorse these acts, creating an unsettling global ripple effect. This issue transcends borders. Just before Christmas, Germany witnessed a Saudi immigrant wreak havoc by driving through a bustling Christmas market, leaving five dead and nearly 200 injured. A similar tragedy unfolded in New Orleans during New Year’s celebrations when an ISIS-affiliated individual drove a truck into a crowd, killing 14 and injuring dozens. These events underscore a harsh truth: the threat of jihadist violence persists, undiminished. With regions like Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen serving as breeding grounds for terrorism, the conditions that enabled the rise of groups like ISIS remain disturbingly intact. In the aftermath of 9/11, the United States vowed to dismantle safe havens for terrorists, reducing ungoverned spaces where extremists could train and launch attacks. While initial efforts saw progress, the resurgence of jihadist strongholds underscores the fragility of these gains. Today, vigilance from intelligence agencies and military forces is imperative, as is the need for decisive action against emerging threats. Domestically, the issue is equally pressing. The New Orleans attacker appears to have been radicalized within the United States, raising critical questions about online recruitment and extremist networks. It is vital that law enforcement agencies aggressively dismantle these networks while holding those who promote terrorism accountable. The work of intelligence professionals is commendable, yet societal complacency and misguided sensitivities hinder progress. Too often, cultural concerns are cited to deflect from addressing the real enablers of extremism. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a prominent Muslim advocacy organization, has faced criticism for its connections to past terrorism cases and controversial statements by its leaders. Nihad Awad, CAIR’s executive director, recently described the October 7 violence in Gaza as a justified breaking of a siege. Ignoring the brutal atrocities committed that day, Awad’s remarks were met with applause from his audience. Such rhetoric, coupled with society’s reluctance to confront it, highlights a dangerous tolerance for extremist ideologies. In New York, a pro-terror rally on New Year’s Day illustrated the alarming normalization of such views. Organized by groups like the Palestinian Youth Movement, the protest featured chants glorifying “intifada” and calls for Jews to “go back to Europe.” Imagine the outcry if similar sentiments were expressed by groups like the KKK. The disparity in public and institutional responses to these threats is a cause for concern. It is time for Americans to demand accountability from those who promote or excuse terrorism. Whether on college campuses or city streets, voices that glorify violence must be challenged. The safety and moral integrity of our society depend on it. Based on a report by NYP 2024-01-07

Earl Spencer school abuse investigation sees police speak to second alleged victimIn his memoir, the 60-year-old says that an unnamed female member of staff was a ‘voracious paedophile’. Detectives investigating claims that Earl Spencer was sexually abused by a member of staff at his boarding school have spoken to a second alleged victim, it has emerged. The brother of Diana Princess of Wales claimed he had been molested by a female member of staff at Maidwell Preparatory School in Northamptonshire in the 1970s. In his memoir, the 60-year-old claimed the unnamed female was a “voracious paedophile” who had groomed him and other boys at the school. In the book, Earl Spencer revealed how the alleged sexual abuse took place when he was moved into a new dormitory. He claimed the staff member – who boys would refer to as “Please” – would come into the room after lights out and hand out illicit snacks. But he said one night she kissed him on the lips before molesting him under the bedsheets. He said he was not the only pupil she did this to and would choose a different boy each term to have intercourse with. Earl Spencer also alleged in his book that the former headmaster would spank boys on their bare bottoms, while another teacher took boys for naked swimming lessons. He wrote that he had been so traumatised by his experiences that he had regularly considered shooting himself with one of his father’s shotguns. Northamptonshire Police launched an investigation into the abuse allegations and a woman from the Midlands was arrested and questioned in June 2024. At the weekend the force confirmed officers had now spoken to a second former pupil about the claims. A police spokesman said: “Officers are investigating reports made by two people in relation to alleged offences.” Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-01-07

As the UK implements a ban on XL bullies, a new breed is rising to prominence among those seeking powerful, intimidating dogs: the cane corso. This Italian mastiff, weighing up to 50kg (110 lbs), has been described as “like an XL bully on steroids” and is rapidly gaining popularity due to its formidable presence and legal status in the country. The cane corso, a descendant of the Molossian war dogs of ancient Rome, has traditionally served as a guard dog. Unlike the restricted XL bullies, which require exemption certificates and must be muzzled in public, the cane corso faces no such limitations, making it an attractive option for those desiring a status dog without the legal constraints. However, its growing popularity raises concerns among experts. Rob Alleyne, a canine behavior specialist who runs the Canine Instructor Academy in Suffolk, has noticed a significant increase in cane corso sightings. “The XL bully ban is driving people towards other large breeds that can be just as dangerous if not trained properly,” Alleyne explained. He warned, “The cane corso is like an XL bully on steroids. It’s a killing machine, and they’ve become much more popular now. [The ban] has just pushed people towards an even worse dog that doesn’t need to be registered, and God help us if they become too popular.” Alleyne compared the current trend to the pitbull terrier ban, which led to the rise of the XL bully, noting a similar pattern with the cane corso. "When they banned the pitbull terrier, what did we get? We got a dog far more dangerous than the pitbull terrier. Then if we ban the cane corso, people will just go out and get something else." Despite not being recognized by the Kennel Club and often excluded from pet insurance coverage, the demand for cane corso puppies is soaring. Prices on the Pets4Homes website range from £600 to £1,600, with more than 200 posts advertising litters. Fully grown cane corsos can even be found for as little as £75. Recent incidents have further highlighted the potential dangers of the breed. Jack Fincham, a reality TV star, faced charges after his cane corso, Elvis, bit a man. In another tragic case, Gary Stevens from Derby was jailed for four and a half years after his cane corso, Ace, killed his brother. Police were forced to shoot Ace after tasering proved ineffective. The rise in cane corso ownership has not gone unnoticed by professional dog walkers. Faith Throssell observed, “I’ve literally not seen [an XL bully] for months, certainly not since the summer. People have got more interested in other big dogs. I’ve seen a few more cane corsos.” Another dog walker in Croydon mentioned a pensioner client who recently acquired a cane corso-rottweiler cross, highlighting the shift in public preference following the XL bully ban. Experts like Alleyne emphasize that the real issue lies in the training and socialization of these powerful breeds. “One of the failings of the current dangerous dogs legislation is that it identifies specific breeds as ‘dangerous’, implying that all other breeds are inherently ‘safe’,” he said. “The fact is that the behavior of a dog is shaped by the way that it is bred, raised, socialized, and trained.” As the cane corso gains traction as the new status symbol, the debate continues over how best to manage the ownership of large, potentially dangerous dogs. Based on a report by The Times 2024-01-07

Keir Starmer, the leader of the Labour Party, has firmly condemned the spread of "lies and misinformation" regarding child sexual exploitation. His comments come in response to Elon Musk's recent remarks on the social media platform X, where Musk accused Starmer of failing to prosecute grooming gangs during his tenure as director of public prosecutions and called Labour MP Jess Phillips a "rape genocide apologist." Musk also suggested Phillips should be jailed. The controversy centers on the government's decision not to initiate a public inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Oldham, a decision defended by Phillips. In response to criticism, Starmer emphasized his commitment to addressing child sexual abuse, stating: "Child sexual exploitation is utterly sickening. For many years, too many victims have been completely let down." Starmer defended his record, asserting that he had tackled the issue "head on" during his time as director of public prosecutions. "I changed the system because I could see some of the things that were going wrong," he explained. Reflecting on the gravity of the issue, he acknowledged, "The victims here suffered terrible abuse, and then they weren't listened to." Speaking on the broader discourse around the topic, Starmer took aim at those perpetuating falsehoods. "Those who are spreading lies and misinformation as far and as wide as possible are not interested in victims; they're interested in themselves," he said, highlighting the harm such narratives cause to survivors seeking justice. Phillips, who has been a vocal advocate for addressing sexual abuse, received Starmer's staunch support amidst the attacks. He stated that Phillips has done "1,000 times more than they've even dreamt about when it comes to protecting victims of sexual abuse." The discussion also touched on existing reviews and inquiries into grooming gangs. Starmer pointed out that there have already been numerous localized investigations and called for the implementation of actionable recommendations. "Now is the time for action on inquiry recommendations," he urged. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak echoed this sentiment, agreeing that "no stone should be left unturned" in addressing the failures of the past. However, he questioned the effectiveness of previous governments in enacting meaningful change. Referring to the Jay Report, an independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, Sunak asked: "Why didn’t the last government implement the Jay requirements?" The tension between calls for further inquiries and the urgency for action highlights the ongoing complexities in addressing systemic failures surrounding child sexual exploitation. Both Starmer and Sunak stressed the importance of tangible measures to support victims and ensure accountability. As the discourse unfolds, the focus remains on safeguarding victims and preventing future abuse while countering the spread of harmful misinformation that distracts from these critical objectives. Based on a report by BBC 2024-01-07 Related Topics: UK Ex-MP Claims Grooming Gang Ethnicity Was Suppressed to Protect Votes Elon Musk Advocates for Tommy Robinson’s Release Amid Criticism of UK Leadership Kemi Badenoch Urges National Inquiry into UK Grooming Scandal

The United States is pushing for a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas to be finalized before the end of Joe Biden's presidency, Secretary of State Antony Blinken revealed during a press conference. The announcement comes ahead of Donald Trump's inauguration on January 20, adding urgency to ongoing diplomatic efforts. “We very much want to bring this over the finish line in the next two weeks, the time we have remaining,” Blinken told reporters when asked about the progress toward a deal. Hamas recently claimed to have provided Israel with a list of 34 hostages that could be released in the first phase of a ceasefire agreement. The list reportedly includes children, women, and the elderly. However, questions remain about the status of the hostages. A source involved in the negotiations told *The Telegraph*, “Israel of course demands that the hostages released are alive and not corpses. So until there’s a clarification on the list, there’s still work to be done to agree on the ceasefire.” The source further disclosed that Israel had already identified Palestinian prisoners who might be released in exchange. However, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the list of hostages provided by Hamas appeared to match the names shared with mediators by Israel in July 2022, suggesting no new information had been presented. While Israel has signaled its willingness to respect a ceasefire deal, officials have emphasized that any pause in hostilities will not signal an end to their campaign against Hamas. “It will be a ceasefire, where the international system along with Israel will hopefully manage to solve the issue of Hamas having any influence in Gaza,” the source added. As efforts to reach an agreement intensify, David Barnea, Israel’s intelligence chief, is reportedly set to travel to Qatar for further discussions. Meanwhile, Blinken’s remarks underscore the Biden administration’s determination to broker a deal that could alleviate tensions and potentially lead to a broader resolution of the conflict. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-01-07

A mob of hooded youths carried out a brazen robbery at the Apple store in Brent Cross shopping centre, North London, on Sunday afternoon. The incident unfolded in broad daylight, leaving shoppers, including families with young children, in a state of panic. The chaos began as the store’s security guard attempted to block one of the youths from entering. While his attention was diverted, the rest of the group rushed through the entrance, shoving aside customers in their path. Some shoppers, including a father who was seen carrying his child, fled in fear as the thieves descended on displays of Apple’s latest products. Employees and security personnel tried to intervene, with one guard in a high-visibility vest attempting to trip the robbers as they made their escape. In the rush, at least one stolen phone was dropped on the floor of the shopping centre. Social media users were quick to condemn the thieves, with many labeling their actions as “savage.” The incident has reignited concerns about the rising tide of retail crime across the UK. The Met Police reported that more than £15 million in goods and cash were stolen in the past year, highlighting the significant financial burden this crime wave places on businesses. The Apple store, one of approximately 120 shops in Brent Cross shopping centre, attracts thousands of visitors daily. Opened in 1976, the centre has long been a bustling retail hub, drawing around 15 million visitors annually. This robbery adds to growing pressure on police forces and the government to address the country’s escalating shoplifting epidemic. As investigations continue, the swift arrests in this case demonstrate law enforcement’s commitment to tackling such crimes head-on. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-01-07

Off topic troll post & bickering removed. Please read it again if you're losing focus, it is not about the bible in a speech from 2023 by Netanyahu

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is increasingly likely to announce his resignation as leader of the Liberal Party, though a final decision has yet to be made, according to a source familiar with his thinking. Speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, the source revealed that Trudeau may declare his intentions as early as Monday, following a report by the *Globe and Mail*. The potential announcement would mark the end of Trudeau's nine-year tenure as leader of Canada’s ruling party. The source’s comments come at a critical moment for the Liberals, who face growing internal pressures amid bleak polling data. Public dissatisfaction has fueled speculation about Trudeau’s future, with some Liberal legislators calling for a leadership change. If Trudeau steps down, the party would face a leadership vacuum at a time when polls suggest it is on track to lose decisively to the opposition Conservatives in the next federal election, which must take place by late October. The *Globe and Mail* reported that Trudeau’s decision could come before an emergency meeting of Liberal parliamentarians scheduled for Wednesday. However, the timing and specifics of his potential resignation remain uncertain. Trudeau’s office has yet to comment on the matter, and his official schedule for Monday lists participation in a virtual cabinet meeting on Canada-U.S. relations. As speculation grows, questions linger about whether Trudeau would step down immediately or remain as prime minister until a new leader is chosen. The *Globe and Mail* suggested that interim leadership discussions have taken place. One source indicated that Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc has been approached as a possible interim leader, though this could be complicated if LeBlanc decides to run for permanent leadership. Trudeau assumed leadership of the Liberals in 2013, at a time when the party was struggling after being reduced to third place in the House of Commons. His leadership brought a resurgence, culminating in a decisive victory in the 2015 federal election. However, a series of challenges in recent years, including ethical controversies, economic pressures, and public dissatisfaction with his administration, have eroded his party’s support. If Trudeau resigns, it could spark calls for a swift election to establish a stable government. This would be crucial for navigating key political challenges, particularly in managing relations with the United States under President-elect Donald Trump. With increasing numbers of Liberal MPs expressing concern over the party’s prospects, Trudeau’s departure could mark the start of a critical transition for the Liberals. Whether this move will reinvigorate the party or exacerbate its challenges remains uncertain as Canadians await an official announcement. Based on a report by Reuters 2024-01-06

Link to a foriegn language site has been removed. English only please as any claims made about it cannot be checked.

In 1831, an immense volcanic eruption altered Earth’s climate, causing temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere to drop by an average of 1 degree Celsius. Nearly 200 years later, scientists have finally pinpointed the source of this mysterious eruption: Zavaritskii volcano on Simushir Island, part of the Kuril Islands archipelago in the northwest Pacific Ocean. This event, one of the most powerful eruptions of the 19th century, released vast quantities of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere. It coincided with the final stages of the Little Ice Age, a period of notable cooling that lasted from the early 1400s to around 1850. Despite the eruption's climatic impact, the volcano responsible remained unidentified for decades due to limited historical records and its remote location. Dr. William Hutchison, a principal research fellow at the University of St. Andrews, explained the challenges of uncovering Zavaritskii’s eruptive history. "For many of Earth’s volcanoes, particularly those in remote areas, we have a very poor understanding of their eruptive history,” he said. “Zavaritskii is located on an extremely remote island between Japan and Russia. No one lives there, and historical records are limited to a handful of diaries from ships that passed these islands every few years.” The breakthrough came through an innovative analysis of ice cores from Greenland. Layers of sulfur isotopes, volcanic ash, and glass shards deposited between 1831 and 1834 pointed to a midlatitude volcano in the Northern Hemisphere. Geochemical analysis and computer modeling ultimately led researchers to Zavaritskii, a volcano whose last known eruption had been in 800 BC. “The moment in the lab analyzing the two ashes together — one from the volcano and one from the ice core — was a genuine eureka moment,” Hutchison shared. While earlier studies misattributed the 1831 eruption to tropical volcanoes like Babuyan Claro in the Philippines, new findings highlight the Kuril Islands as a source of significant climatic disruptions. Dr. Stefan Brönnimann, a climatologist at the University of Bern, emphasized the importance of this discovery. “This eruption had global climatic impacts but was wrongly attributed to a tropical volcano for a long time period. The research now shows that the eruption took place on the Kurils, not in the tropics.” The impact of the eruption extended far beyond the Northern Hemisphere's cooler temperatures. The resulting environmental changes contributed to widespread famine and hardship across India, Japan, and Europe. “It seems plausible that volcanic climate cooling led to crop failure and famine,” Hutchison said. “A focus of ongoing research is to understand to what extent these famines were caused by volcanic climate cooling or by other socio-political factors.” The identification of Zavaritskii adds to a broader understanding of the role of volcanic activity in shaping Earth’s climate. Alongside other eruptions, such as Tambora in Indonesia in 1815 and Cosegüina in Nicaragua in 1835, it underscores the significant impact of volcanic eruptions during the Little Ice Age. Hutchison stressed the importance of monitoring isolated volcanoes like Zavaritskii, as future eruptions could have devastating global consequences. “We don’t really have a coordinated international community to kick into gear when the next big one happens,” he warned. “That is something we need to think about as both scientists and as a society.” By shedding light on the mysterious 1831 eruption, this research highlights the delicate interplay between natural events and human history and the need for vigilance in the face of Earth’s unpredictable geological forces. Based on a report by CNN 2024-01-06

The Biden administration has formally notified Congress of a proposed $8 billion arms sale to Israel, encompassing munitions for fighter jets and attack helicopters, as well as artillery shells, according to sources with direct knowledge of the deal. This marks a significant and possibly final arms transfer to Israel under the current administration. The decision arrives amidst ongoing claims from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his supporters that the Biden administration had imposed a silent “arms embargo” on Israel. Despite calls from some Democrats to condition arms sales on Israel’s approach to the war effort and humanitarian concerns in Gaza, President Biden chose not to tie such conditions to the deal. This agreement is structured as a long-term arrangement, with a mix of immediate fulfillment from U.S. stocks and deliveries that could take several years to complete. According to sources, the package includes a range of advanced weaponry: AIM-120C-8 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles for intercepting airborne threats, including drones; 155mm artillery shells; Hellfire AGM-114 missiles for attack helicopters; small diameter bombs; and JDAM tail kits that convert conventional bombs into precision-guided munitions. Additionally, the deal comprises 500-pound warheads and bomb fuzes, demonstrating a focus on both air superiority and ground-based offensive capabilities. A U.S. official stated that the sale is designed to bolster Israel’s long-term security by replenishing critical munitions and enhancing air defense systems. "The President has made clear Israel has a right to defend its citizens, consistent with international law and international humanitarian law, and to deter aggression from Iran and its proxy organizations,” the official said. “We will continue to provide the capabilities necessary for Israel's defense." Approval of the sale now lies with the House and Senate foreign relations committees, which will review the proposal. Given its scope and timing, the agreement underscores the Biden administration’s commitment to Israel’s security amidst regional instability, even as it navigates domestic and international scrutiny over the broader implications of arms transfers in the context of ongoing conflicts. While the deal is poised to address Israel’s strategic needs, its political and humanitarian ramifications remain subjects of debate, reflecting the delicate balance between defense partnerships and accountability in international relations. Based on a report by AXIOS 2024-01-06

Donald Trump has voiced strong criticism of the United Kingdom's energy policies, particularly its reliance on wind energy and the recent hike in windfall taxes on fossil fuel profits. Trump called these moves a "very big mistake" and urged the UK to "get rid of windmills" while opening up the North Sea for more oil and gas production. In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump shared a news article from November detailing the withdrawal of a major U.S. oil producer, Apache, from the North Sea. The region, situated off the Scottish coast, is a significant hub for oil production. Trump wrote, "The UK is making a very big mistake. Open up the North Sea. Get rid of windmills!" Apache announced it would cease operations in the North Sea by 2029, attributing its decision partly to the increased windfall tax imposed on fossil fuel companies. The energy profits levy, introduced as a response to surging energy prices following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, was raised to 38% in October by UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves. This marked an increase from the original 25% introduced by Rishi Sunak in 2022. John Christmann, chief executive of Apache’s parent company, APA Corporation, explained that the investment required to meet UK regulations, combined with the "onerous financial impact" of the windfall tax, made hydrocarbon production beyond 2029 economically unviable. He also noted that substantial investments would be necessary to comply with regulatory requirements, further discouraging long-term commitments in the region. Trump's remarks reflect his broader stance on energy production. During his first presidential campaign, he popularized the phrase "drill, baby, drill," signaling his commitment to expanding oil and gas production. He has indicated that increasing domestic energy output will remain a key focus if he secures a second term in office. The windfall tax, formally known as the energy price levy, was introduced to address record profits reported by many oil and gas companies amid soaring energy prices. The additional revenue was intended to help alleviate the financial burden on households facing skyrocketing gas and electricity bills during a widespread cost-of-living crisis. Despite its intended benefits, the policy has faced criticism from industry stakeholders, with Apache being one of several firms reevaluating or scaling back operations in the North Sea. Critics argue that the tax discourages investment in the region, potentially undermining the UK’s energy security and economic stability. As global energy challenges continue, the debate over the balance between promoting renewable energy and maintaining fossil fuel production remains contentious. Trump's call to prioritize oil and gas over wind energy adds a high-profile voice to the conversation, further fueling the discourse on the future of energy policy in the UK and beyond. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-01-06

As Americans celebrated the arrival of a new year on New Year's Day, the dark reality of radicalized violence shattered the festive atmosphere in New Orleans. Around 3:15 a.m. local time on Bourbon Street, a bustling hub of New Year's revelry, tragedy struck. Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a U.S. Army veteran who had converted to Islam and reportedly embraced extremist ideologies, drove a rented pickup truck into a dense crowd of partiers. The vehicle was more than just a weapon of impact; it was packed with firearms, improvised explosive devices, and an ISIS flag. This horrific act of violence left at least 15 dead and more than 30 injured, turning a night of joy into one of devastation. Jabbar’s journey toward radicalization remains under investigation, but some details are emerging. He had been associated with Masjid Bilal, a mosque in Houston. In the wake of this horrific event, the mosque advised its members via social media to avoid speaking directly with the FBI, instead directing inquiries to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR, a controversial organization, has faced criticism and scrutiny over the years. It was listed by the FBI as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 case against the Holy Land Foundation, the largest terror financing prosecution in U.S. history. Former FBI counterterrorism officials have also described the group as a “front organization for Hamas,” a designation that continues to stir heated debate. A few hours later several hundred demonstrators called for an intifada at an anti-Israel protest in New York City’s Times Square to mark New Year’s Day. Attendees chanted “Resistance is glorious — we will be victorious,” “We will honor all our martyrs,” and “Gaza, you make us proud.” They carried signs that said “Zionism is cancer,” “No war on Iran,” and “End all US aid to Israel.” “There is only one solution — Intifada revolution,” they chanted, using a common refrain at anti-Israel rallies in the US. “Intifada,” Arabic for “uprising,” is associated with the Second Intifada, a period of terror attacks in Israel in the early 2000s marked by suicide bombings. For decades, political leaders and commentators have oscillated between vigilance and complacency regarding the threat posed by radical Islamic extremism. The assassinations of figures like Osama bin Laden and the dismantling of ISIS’s territorial control fostered a dangerous sense of security among some policymakers. Groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, often dismissed as regional concerns primarily affecting Israel, were deprioritized in the broader U.S. national security strategy. However, history provides ample warnings about the risks of underestimating jihadist networks. The 1983 Hezbollah bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, which claimed the lives of 241 American servicemen, remains a poignant reminder of their capacity for destruction. In contrast to this historical vigilance, recent political and cultural priorities have shifted focus domestically, with some officials concentrating on issues like abortion clinic protests and school board controversies. Meanwhile, fundamental security recommendations, such as those outlined in the 9/11 Commission’s final report urging a secure U.S.-Mexico border, appear to have been sidelined. The New Orleans attack is a grim testament to the persistent and evolving threat of radical Islamic jihad. It underscores the urgent need for robust national security measures, including tightened border controls and renewed international cooperation to combat extremism. The United States must remember the lessons of the past and confront the realities of the present. As the nation mourns the victims of this senseless act, it is imperative to recognize that complacency is not an option. If America is to prevent future tragedies, it must commit to a vigilant and proactive stance against the multifaceted threats posed by radical ideologies. Based on a report by NewsWeek | TOI 2024-01-06

Europe stands on the brink of an economic apocalypse, with its longstanding prosperity under siege from stagnation, dwindling competitiveness, and the potential return of Donald Trump to the White House. As Mario Draghi starkly warned in a recent report, this is “an existential challenge” for the continent. Historically, Europe thrived on innovation and a robust economic model underpinned by its eastern expansion and strong trade relationships with the U.S. and Asia. Yet, the once-firm foundations of this prosperity now show alarming cracks. With China’s economic boom losing steam and U.S.-Europe trade relations clouded by rising tensions, Europe’s economic trajectory appears increasingly precarious. The challenges could escalate dramatically under a second Trump presidency. His administration has already hinted at imposing punitive tariffs on European goods, from Bordeaux wine to luxury Italian suits. Trump’s persistent demand for NATO allies to contribute more financially to their own defense adds another strain. European governments, already grappling with soaring deficits and declining tax revenues, face the prospect of deeper financial and political turmoil. Europe’s woes, however, go beyond external pressures. At its core, the continent faces a troubling truth: it has become an “innovation desert.” Despite a storied history of transformative inventions—from the automobile to modern pharmaceuticals—Europe has ceded ground in global innovation. Christine Lagarde, speaking at Paris’s historic Collège des Bernardins, cautioned that Europe’s cherished social model is at risk unless the region swiftly adapts. “Otherwise, we will not be able to generate the wealth we will need to meet our rising spending needs to ensure our security, combat climate change and protect the environment,” she said. The statistics paint a grim picture. Europe’s global tech presence is paltry, with only four of the world’s top 50 tech firms hailing from the continent. In the automotive sector, despite accounting for over 40% of global R&D spending, European carmakers missed the electric vehicle revolution. Germany’s auto giants, for instance, focused on optimizing diesel engines while companies like Tesla and Chinese manufacturers dominated the electric vehicle market. This failure has led to significant repercussions, including Volkswagen’s decision to shutter some German plants for the first time in its history. Compounding the issue is Europe’s chronic underinvestment in emerging technologies. IMF data reveals that U.S. tech companies spend over twice as much on R&D as their European counterparts, resulting in a 40% productivity surge in the U.S. tech sector since 2005, compared to stagnation in Europe. Lagarde succinctly captured the problem: “Europe is falling behind in emerging technologies that will drive future growth.” This economic malaise extends beyond tech and cars. European industries face mounting competition from China in areas like machinery and trains, sectors where the region once held dominance. Meanwhile, social spending in many EU nations is unsustainable under current economic conditions. France, for example, spends over 30% of GDP on social programs but is grappling with a budget deficit expected to surpass 7% by 2025. As borrowing costs rise and economic growth stagnates, the stark reality is that Europe may face difficult decisions reminiscent of Greece’s austerity measures in 2010. Clemens Fuest of the Ifo Institute reflected on Europe’s lack of preparation for these challenges: “The failure of Europe’s leaders to draw lessons from the last Trump presidency is now coming back to haunt us.” If Europe’s leaders fail to act decisively, the continent risks becoming a “debt-ridden, open-air museum,” as Draghi described. The trouble is, by the time Europeans wake up to their new reality, it may be too late to do much about it. Based on a report by Politico 2024-01-06

Labour has been accused of attempting to manipulate the next general election by proposing significant changes to voting laws. Critics claim the proposed reforms could dismantle safeguards against voter fraud and extend voting rights to millions of foreign nationals, potentially securing a Labour majority in future elections. Speculation in Westminster suggests Labour ministers are planning sweeping electoral reforms. Among the most contentious proposals is a move to extend voting rights to 16 and 17-year-olds, a change that could be enacted through legislation expected later this year. Adding to the controversy, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), a think-tank aligned with Labour, has recommended relaxing or removing the requirement for voters to present photographic identification, a measure introduced in 2022 to prevent voter fraud and intimidation. The IPPR argues that easing photo ID rules could increase voter turnout among marginalized groups, such as renters and non-graduates. The think-tank's report warns that ignoring political inequality would harm the Government's legitimacy, stating, “Letting current trends in political inequality play out would be an obvious act of self-harm for this Government.” Another divisive suggestion from the IPPR involves granting voting rights to approximately five million foreign nationals who are permanent taxpaying residents in the UK. Currently, voting rights are restricted to citizens of the UK, Ireland, and Commonwealth nations. The IPPR’s report highlights, “Around five million permanent taxpaying residents of the UK do not have the right to vote in its elections… There is clear need for a wider political conversation about the notion of citizenship and voting rights in the UK.” Additionally, the report proposes automatically registering voters before their 16th birthdays, potentially adding 700,000 young people to the electoral register annually. The combination of these changes could significantly alter the electorate, with critics arguing the reforms disproportionately benefit Labour. The proposals have sparked fierce backlash from Conservative MPs. Nigel Huddleston, co-chairman of the Conservative Party, accused Labour of attempting to undermine the electoral process. “This is nothing more than a shameless attempt by Labour to rig elections in its favour and turn a blind eye to electoral fraud,” Huddleston said. “It is no surprise that Labour has resorted to dirty tricks to improve its chances of electoral success and try to distract people away from its failures. In six short months in power, it has trashed the economy, whacked up taxes, and cut the winter fuel payment for 10 million vulnerable pensioners.” The controversy has also reignited scrutiny of the IPPR, a think-tank with a storied history of influencing Labour policy. Once dubbed “Tony Blair’s favourite think-tank,” the IPPR played a pivotal role during the New Labour era. Today, it wields significant influence over Sir Keir Starmer’s administration. The Prime Minister has appointed former IPPR executive director Carys Roberts and policy expert Rachel Statham to advisory roles, signaling the think-tank’s continued sway in shaping Labour’s agenda. As the debate over electoral reforms intensifies, questions remain about the broader implications for democracy and the balance of power in the UK. Critics argue the proposed changes represent a dangerous precedent, while supporters contend they are necessary to modernize the voting system and promote inclusivity. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-01-06

Bill Maher has not held back his criticism of the "crazies" within the Democratic Party, making his views clear during a recent interview with the *Wall Street Journal*. Known for his sharp wit and unapologetic commentary, Maher explained why his comedy increasingly targets the left, despite being a lifelong Democrat. “You’re damn right I do, because you give me more material,” Maher said when asked about his satirical focus on the left. “I’m a comedian. I’m going to go where the gold is.” He emphasized the unique power of humor in political discourse, stating, “I think humor is one of the best avenues to get at the truth, maybe the best, especially in politics. When someone laughs, it is involuntary. So you can make the audience admit that they agree with you even if they really don’t want to.” Maher criticized the left’s inability to tolerate differing viewpoints, agreeing with the interviewer’s observation that the “woke” often fail to laugh at themselves. “This is one of the issues I have with the left,” he remarked. “They can’t stand to have to endure a moment of hearing something they don’t already agree with. Not that the right doesn’t do it, too, but the left does it worse.” He also addressed backlash from his liberal friends regarding his decision to host conservative guests on his show, such as Ann Coulter. “‘I had liberal friends who just couldn’t stand that. Just think about what this is,’” Maher said, pausing for effect. “‘That’s people who hate me for who I won’t hate.’” He repeated for emphasis, “‘People who hate me for who I won’t hate.’” When asked why many on the left struggle to engage civilly with those they disagree with, Maher attributed it to virtue signaling. “It’s in their psychological profile. They just have this need for virtue signaling, and to have their friends—and I guess everybody on social media—think of them as the good people. ‘We’re the good people. We know who’s good. And it’s us.’” Despite his criticism, Maher dispelled rumors of switching political allegiances. “Many Republicans say, ‘Maybe we could get Bill Maher.’ No, you can’t. What you can get is Bill Maher being honest about the left. I’m not going to join your team that doesn’t believe in democracy.” However, Maher acknowledged the appeal of the Republican Party to some voters, explaining, “There are voters who are not particularly enamored with Trump, not blind to his many flaws, but they just feel that the crazy on the left is somehow worse. I don’t agree with them, but I get it. I don’t hate them for voting for him.” Maher also critiqued the younger generation for what he perceives as a lack of perspective, particularly those educated at elite universities. “They have no idea, no perspective. Of course, if they’ve gone to elite universities, i.e., a—h— factories, they’ve been indoctrinated into this idea that they live in the worst country in the world at the worst time in history, when actually they live in, with all our flaws, still probably the best, with definitely indisputably the best time in history.” While Maher called for a “metaphorical colonic” for the country, he rejected the notion that America needs a revolution. “I like America. America does not need a revolution,” he said, pushing back against extremist rhetoric. Maher expressed concern that Democrats risk losing elections by failing to connect with voters. “They often say, when they lose elections, ‘We didn’t get our message out.’ Yes, you did. They just didn’t like it. You got it out loud and clear.” Concluding with his signature bluntness, Maher turned his sights on Vice President Kamala Harris, declaring, “You lost a crazy contest to an actual crazy person. Congratulations.” Based on a report by NYP 2024-01-06

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz recently shared his thoughts on handling tech mogul Elon Musk, who has been exchanging sharp comments with German politicians. Scholz advised against engaging with Musk, suggesting it is better not to “feed the troll.” “There are a lot of people on social media who want to attract attention with snappy slogans,” Scholz said during an interview with the German magazine *Stern*, published on Saturday. “I don’t believe in courting Mr. Musk’s favor,” he added, “I’m happy to leave that to others.” Scholz further emphasized that as a Social Democrat, he is accustomed to dealing with wealthy media entrepreneurs who do not appreciate Social Democratic policies and openly express their disdain. His remarks came amidst an ongoing back-and-forth with Musk, a tech billionaire closely allied with President-elect Donald Trump. Musk, recently appointed by Trump to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) alongside Vivek Ramaswamy, has used his social media platform to mock Scholz, referring to him as “Oaf Schitz” and predicting his defeat in the upcoming parliamentary elections on February 23. This jab came shortly after Musk wrote an op-ed in the German newspaper *Welt am Sonntag*, where he expressed strong support for Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), led by Alice Weidel. In the op-ed, Musk criticized Germany's bureaucracy and regulatory overreach, endorsing AfD’s immigration policies. Following the publication of Musk’s op-ed, the German government accused him of interfering in the country's electoral process. However, they downplayed his efforts to boost support for the AfD, stating that “freedom of expression also includes the greatest nonsense.” In his New Year’s address, Scholz subtly responded to Musk’s provocations, saying, “In our debates, one can be forgiven for sometimes thinking the more extreme an opinion is, the more attention it will garner.” Scholz expressed greater concern over Musk’s support for the AfD, a party with elements that are right-wing extremist, promote reconciliation with Putin’s Russia, and seek to weaken transatlantic relations. “It’s much more worrying than such insults,” Scholz told *Stern*. Musk, who has been increasingly involved in U.S. politics, backing Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign with a significant financial contribution of at least $250 million, is set to speak with Weidel, the AfD leader, on January 9 via his platform, X. Germany is heading into its February election amidst political turmoil, following the collapse of Scholz's coalition in November. Based on a report by The Hill 2024-01-06

President-elect Donald Trump announced on Friday that former Fox News contributor Tammy Bruce will soon be joining his State Department. Bruce is set to work alongside Marco Rubio, the nominee for United States Secretary of State, as the new Spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State. “It is my great honor to announce that Tammy Bruce will be joining our incredible Nominee for United States Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, as Spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State,” Trump shared on his social media platform, Truth Social. Bruce had been a contributor at Fox News until Friday, a role she held since joining the network in 2005. She is also an accomplished author of several books. A Fox News spokesperson confirmed Bruce’s departure, stating, “Tammy Bruce has been an extremely valued contributor at FOX News Media for nearly 20 years, and we wish her all the best in her new role.” Trump praised Bruce, calling her a “highly respected political analyst” who had firsthand experience with “the lies and fraud of the Radical Left.” According to her bio on Fox News, Bruce was once a registered Democrat and was involved in several left-wing political campaigns during the 1990s. She later transitioned to using her experience as a liberal community organizer to oppose and expose the leftist agenda. Previously, she led the National Organization for Women. “As one of the longest-serving News Contributors, Tammy has brought TRUTH to the American People for over two decades,” Trump wrote. “I know she will bring that same strength of conviction and fearless spirit to her new position as State Department Spokesperson.” Bruce joins a growing list of former Fox News personalities who have been appointed to positions in Trump’s incoming administration, including Sean Duffy, Pete Hegseth, Janette Nesheiwat, and Monica Crowley. Notably, Bruce’s new role does not require Senate confirmation. Based on a report by The Hill 2024-01-06

Four years ago, after the upheaval of the Trump administration, President Joe Biden entered office with a promise to restore alliances and uphold democracy. The responsibility for executing this vision on the global stage fell to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, a seasoned diplomat and close Biden confidant with two decades of collaboration with the president. Their message to allies and adversaries alike was clear: a stable and predictable era of American leadership was on the horizon. However, Blinken’s tenure quickly became a trial by fire. The chaotic and widely criticized withdrawal from Afghanistan marked a difficult start. This was soon overshadowed by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, a conflict that presented a generational challenge to global stability. More recently, Hamas’s brutal attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza further plunged the region into turmoil, with ripple effects destabilizing both international and domestic political climates. Despite these challenges, Blinken has remained steadfast in advocating Biden’s vision of strong, proactive diplomacy as the solution to the world’s most pressing issues. "We continue to believe that the quickest way, the most effective way to have an enduring end to Gaza is through an agreement on a cease-fire that brings the hostages home. The two biggest impediments to getting that over the finish line — and we’ve been so close on several occasions and as we speak today, we’re also very close — there have been two major impediments, and they both go to what drives Hamas. One has been whenever there has been public daylight between the United States and Israel and the perception that pressure was growing on Israel, we’ve seen it: Hamas has pulled back from agreeing to a cease-fire and the release of hostages. And so there are times when what we say in private to Israel where we have a disagreement is one thing, and what we’re doing or saying in public may be another. But that’s in no small measure because with this daylight, the prospects of getting the hostage and cease-fire deal over the finish line become more distant." As Biden’s administration nears its conclusion, the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East persist, showing no clear path to resolution. The potential return of Donald Trump to the White House raises further uncertainty. A new Trump administration is expected to adopt a markedly different approach, retreating from the alliances and international institutions that Blinken and Biden have worked to strengthen. This oscillation in American foreign policy has left observers questioning the country’s reliability and its evolving role in the global order. Throughout these turbulent years, Blinken has remained committed to the ideals of diplomacy and international cooperation. His efforts have underscored the complexities of balancing immediate crises with long-term strategic goals. The legacy of his tenure, like the administration he serves, will likely be judged in the context of these extraordinary challenges and the outcomes they yield. Antony Blinken Says the War in Gaza Won’t Define His Legacy Based on a report by NYT 2024-01-06

A number of posts have been reported and removed for being off topic, mainly instigated by @frank83628 Replies also removed. This topic is not about Ukraine and Russian war. Why South Korea Should Go Nuclear

Off topic troll post removed @placeholder

There is a seperate topic already running for that. This is not it.

A couple of troll posts removed along with a very immature sarcastic follow up troll post @Will B Good 17. ASEAN NOW news team collects news articles from various recognised and reputable news sources. The articles may be consolidated from different sources and rewritten with AI assistance These news items are shared in our forums for members to stay informed and engaged. Our dedicated news team puts in the effort to deliver quality content, and we ask for your respect in return. Any disrespectful comments about our news articles or the content itself, such as calling it "clickbait" or “slow news day”, and criticising grammatical errors, will not be tolerated and appropriate action will be taken. Please note that republished articles may contain errors or opinions that do not reflect the views of ASEAN NOW. If you'd like to help us, and you see an error with an article, then please use the report function so that we can attend to it promptly.

A baiting troll post removed @blaze master along with replies Please discuss the "topic" nicely or it will be more than posts removed. Elon Musk and JD Vance Spark Controversy with Support for Germany’s Far-Right AfD

Reminder of the topic: Netherlands: Names of 425,000 Suspected Nazi Collaborators Published Online This topic is not about other wars and certainly nothing to do with the Palestinians