Social Media

Germany has ordered the closure of all three Iranian consulates within its borders following Iran’s execution of Iranian-German national Jamshid Sharmahd, a 69-year-old dissident who resided in the United States. This decision, announced Thursday by German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, underscores a significant diplomatic fallout between Germany and Iran and leaves the Islamic Republic with only its embassy in Berlin. Sharmahd, who had been living in Glendora, California, was detained in 2020 after being kidnapped from Dubai by Iranian security forces while attempting to travel to India for business. On Monday, he was executed by Iranian authorities on terrorism charges, stemming from allegations of his involvement in a 2008 mosque bombing that killed 14 people and injured over 200 others. Iran further accused him of plotting additional attacks through the Kingdom Assembly of Iran and its militant wing, Tondar, as well as disclosing sensitive information about Iran’s missile sites during a 2017 television appearance. His family, however, has maintained his innocence, rejecting the charges as fabricated. Germany, the United States, and international human rights groups condemned Sharmahd’s trial, describing it as a “sham.” The German Foreign Ministry summoned Iran’s charge d’affaires to protest the execution, and German Ambassador Markus Potzel raised objections to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi before being recalled to Berlin for further consultations. Baerbock stated that her government had made it clear to Tehran that executing a German citizen would carry serious repercussions, emphasizing that Sharmahd’s case was central to discussions with Araghchi in New York only a month prior. “The latest comments by the Iranian foreign minister, in which he puts the cold-blooded murder of Jamshid Sharmahd in the context of German support for Israel, also speak for themselves,” Baerbock said. “Iran’s government knows above all the language of blackmail, threat, and violence.” Iran responded to Germany’s outcry with defiance. Foreign Minister Araghchi dismissed the protests, asserting that “a German passport does not provide impunity to anyone, let alone a terrorist criminal,” and accused Baerbock of “gaslighting.” He further contended that Germany was an “accomplice” in what he described as an “ongoing Israeli genocide,” referring to Germany’s alliance with Israel amidst rising tensions in Gaza and Lebanon. This diplomatic clash represents one of Germany’s rare moves to close foreign consulates, indicating a serious deterioration in relations. Last year, Germany similarly directed Russia to close four of its five consulates following diplomatic restrictions imposed on German missions in Russia. Baerbock remarked that diplomatic relations with Iran had already been “at more than a low point” and reiterated Germany’s intent to advocate for the release of other German nationals detained in Iran. At a broader level, the execution has further strained Iran’s ties with the European Union. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell stated Tuesday that “the execution of a European citizen is seriously harming relations between Iran and the European Union.” He added that the EU would “now consider targeted and significant measures,” without specifying further details. Baerbock highlighted that the EU had recently imposed new sanctions on Iran and expressed support for designating Iran’s Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Sharmahd’s family last received a message from him on July 28, 2020. Although the details surrounding his abduction remain unclear, tracking data indicated that his phone moved south from Dubai into Oman before the signal disappeared in Sohar. Two days later, Iranian authorities claimed to have captured Sharmahd in a “complex operation” and later released a photograph of him blindfolded. The diplomatic response has intensified since then, with Germany even expelling two Iranian diplomats last year over Sharmahd’s initial death sentence. The case has reignited international debate over Iran’s treatment of dissidents and Germany’s stance against Iran’s approach to foreign relations and human rights abuses. Based on a report by AP 2024-11-02

Former President Donald Trump has launched a $10 billion lawsuit against CBS News, claiming that the network deceptively edited an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris to sway public opinion and unfairly bolster her image. Trump’s legal team contends that the alleged editing was intended to mislead voters by presenting Harris’ responses on the sensitive issue of the Israel-Hamas conflict in a favorable light for the Democrats. Trump’s attorneys argue that these selective edits, which were not made publicly available in their uncut form, are part of a broader CBS strategy “to tip the scales in favor of the Democratic Party” through news distortion that was “intended to confuse, deceive, and mislead the public.” The suit also references Trump’s prior public call for CBS to release the unedited transcript, which he claims would reveal bias and selective framing. CBS responded to the lawsuit, refuting the claims as “completely without merit.” A spokesperson for the network stated that “60 MINUTES fairly presented the Interview to inform the viewing audience, and not to mislead it,” affirming the network’s commitment to responsible and unbiased journalism. CBS had previously acknowledged trimming Harris’ response, maintaining that it was a necessary edit to include more content within the program’s allotted time. “When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate, and on point,” the network had said on October 20. The legal filing calls for a jury trial and substantial damages, alleging that CBS’s actions violate Texas laws prohibiting deceptive acts in business practices. Trump, who has previously declined interview requests from “60 Minutes,” has labeled the alleged editing as potentially “the Biggest Scandal in Broadcast History.” CBS has stated it intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-02

In an upcoming documentary, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson shared an experience he claims involved a demon attack. Carlson, known for his outspoken views, recounted the unusual expereince, which he says left him with visible injuries and shook his understanding of the supernatural. The segment was filmed as part of *Christianities*, a crowdfunded documentary that explores various Christian traditions and experiences, although the exact timing of Carlson’s interview is unclear. This isn't the first time Carlson has mentioned an interest in the supernatural. The Wall Street Journal reported that he discussed demonic forces in a conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, allegedly telling Putin, “demonic possession is real, I happen to know for a fact.” Carlson’s apparent belief in such forces aligns with some statements made by his supporters, particularly following his departure from Fox News last April. During that period, Carlson, who once referred to former President Donald Trump as a “demonic force” in a text message during the January 6 insurrection, faced significant media scrutiny. Carlson’s firing sparked reactions among his Christian followers, with some asserting that his departure was due to spiritual warfare. Texas-based televangelist Lance Wallnau, in particular, claimed that Carlson’s exit from the network was a win for the “devil,” stating, “Tucker is a casualty of [the spiritual] war. I don’t like it when the devil wins.” Carlson’s story has sparked curiosity and speculation, though his representatives have not commented publicly on the claims. The documentary clip adds a new dimension to the former host’s outspoken persona, revealing his thoughts on faith, the supernatural, and his belief that his unusual experience with “something unseen” has left a lasting impact on his worldview. Based on a report by Daily Beast 2024-11-02

Conspiracey post on the the Kalerghi Plan removed. Repeat and it will be more than the post removed

A troll post and reply has been removed.

Off topic troll posts removed @BruceWayne

Israel's recent accusations of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) colluding with Hamas have intensified scrutiny of the organization’s role in Gaza, threatening the delivery of critical humanitarian aid. In February, the Israeli Defense Force announced the discovery of a Hamas data center under the UNRWA headquarters in Gaza's Rimal neighborhood. According to Colonel Benny Aharon, “UNRWA provides cover for Hamas, UNRWA knows exactly what is happening underground, and UNRWA uses its budget to fund some of Hamas’s military capabilities, this is for certain.” This discovery, along with tunnels found beneath UNRWA schools, has raised serious questions about UNRWA’s relationship with Hamas. The controversy deepened when footage emerged allegedly showing an UNRWA employee loading the body of an Israeli victim into an SUV during the Oct. 7 attacks, sparking Israeli outrage. While UNRWA spokesperson Jonathan Fowler commented that verifying the footage was impossible, the video strained relations further. The Knesset recently passed laws banning UNRWA operations in Israel-controlled areas, marking an unprecedented rupture between Israel and the UN agency. As the primary provider of essential services for Palestinians in Gaza, UNRWA is viewed by many as vital for basic healthcare, education, and humanitarian aid. However, it has also come under fire from organizations like the independent UN Watch group, which has documented what it claims are UNRWA’s links to terrorism and Islamist ideology. Hillel Neuer, UN Watch’s chief executive, argues, “UNRWA has kept Palestinians in a state of dependency for 75 years. Rather than help make Gaza into Tel Aviv 2.0, they have told Palestinians their homes are not in Gaza but in Israel, nurturing grievance, revenge, and terrorism.” UNRWA, established in 1949 following the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, is the only UN agency dedicated exclusively to a specific region. Predominantly funded by the U.S., European countries, and the UK, which contributed £35 million in the past year, UNRWA provides essential support in Gaza. Yet, revelations of Hamas-aligned individuals within its staff complicate the situation. Neuer asserts, “For the past 10 years we have been monitoring UNRWA staff’s support for terrorism on public social media,” citing posts glorifying Adolf Hitler and praising violence against Jews. While UNRWA dismissed some staff after these findings, many were reinstated, such as Fathi al-Sharif, a teachers’ union leader in Lebanon who was suspended but later returned following protests. Further complicating matters is Suhail al-Hindi, former head of UNRWA’s teachers’ union in Gaza, whose affiliation with Hamas’ politburo was widely suspected for years before his dismissal in 2017. With prominent staff accused of supporting Hamas, Israel’s decision to ban UNRWA complicates both the organization’s ability to provide aid and the Western nations’ humanitarian involvement in Gaza. Despite these connections, some argue that while Hamas’ influence in Gaza may be significant, it does not directly implicate UNRWA’s relief mission. Yet Israel’s stance effectively formalizes a distrust of UNRWA, hardening the divide and making a peaceful resolution to this tense dynamic seem even more elusive. The Knesset, has effectively ended Israel’s dealings with UNRWA and banned it from any Israeli-controlled territory. This is due to take place in 3 months. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-01

The new government’s bold claim to “honesty with voters” has unraveled quickly, as its first Budget reveals a path fraught with challenges for Britain. In any administration, the first Budget after a prolonged period in opposition is a defining moment, laying out campaign promises as policy and setting a clear direction for the country. Labour’s initial pledge to avoid tax increases and stimulate growth was quickly contradicted, however, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves implementing a substantial £40 billion tax hike—one of the most significant in recent history, despite concerns that it may dampen economic momentum. In addition to this tax increase, Reeves is taking on significant borrowing, which she once promised to avoid in favor of “balancing the books.” The funds are intended for expansive public spending projects, a move that will undoubtedly drive inflation, keep interest rates high, and place additional financial burdens on future generations. Reeves contends that the spending will pay off, suggesting that these costs will be worth it for future generations, who will supposedly benefit from improved infrastructure, science initiatives, transportation, and enhanced educational and housing facilities. However, her most substantial allocation is to the National Health Service (NHS), receiving an additional £22 billion for daily operations without any proposed reforms or productivity goals attached. While Reeves points to a forthcoming “10-year plan” by Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who promises systemic improvements next year, past reforms suggest caution. History has shown that without a fundamental overhaul, the injection of funds into the NHS often fails to yield meaningful improvements, with much of the allocated money absorbed by inefficiencies and administrative costs. Reeves’s Budget has also broken several campaign promises. The government had vowed to leave National Insurance rates untouched and not manipulate fiscal figures to justify borrowing—commitments it quickly abandoned. Labour’s claim of a £22 billion “black hole” in the finances, meant to justify their tax measures, was revealed to be more fiction than fact, lacking support from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Instead, the OBR’s forecast projects growth to peak at only 2% before dropping, undermining Labour’s growth ambitions and prompting Reeves to reference a vague “long-term growth” projection, which lacks immediate relevance. This cautious economic outlook did little to dampen Labour MPs’ enthusiasm for Reeves, who was celebrated by her peers as she asserted that her policies would stimulate economic growth, portraying herself as a kind of modern-day economic “alchemist.” Despite her optimism, history shows that true growth is more often driven by businesses and entrepreneurs than government policies. Reeves’s approach, however, may stifle that entrepreneurial drive, as her Budget introduces new tax pressures and regulations. Labour’s Budget brings a hefty increase to the National Minimum Wage, including a 16% hike for workers aged 18 to 20. While framed by the Chancellor as a benefit, this cost ultimately falls on businesses. Reeves has also introduced new employee rights, estimated to cost employers £5 billion, while increasing National Insurance rates from 13.8% to 15%. Employers will now also start paying National Insurance at a lower income threshold—reduced from £9,100 to £5,000—adding £615 in National Insurance for every qualifying employee. Known as a “tax on jobs,” these changes will likely limit job creation, leading businesses to reconsider growth plans. This policy has been described by some as a “poll tax on business” that dampens innovation and expansion at a critical moment for the economy. Notably, none of the senior ministers in the current government have direct business experience, raising questions about the administration’s grasp of private sector dynamics. The National Insurance hike alone is expected to raise £25 billion, placing the revenue burden for public spending largely on businesses—the very engines of economic growth. Reeves defends these tax measures, arguing that businesses will ultimately benefit from improved schools, healthcare, and housing. While this may hold some truth, these benefits mean little to companies if they struggle to remain profitable under increased financial obligations. Overseas investors, whom Reeves claims she is keen to attract, may also be dissuaded by the new Capital Gains Tax hike, increased stamp duties, and stricter regulations on non-domiciled residents. Such changes pose significant deterrents for potential investors, who may think twice before bringing capital to the UK under such conditions. During the campaign, Conservatives warned that Labour would revert to its historical trend of tax hikes, increased spending, and heavy borrowing. True to form, the new government has done precisely that, contradicting its earlier promises. Rishi Sunak, the outgoing Opposition leader, summarized the situation succinctly, arguing that Labour’s supposed commitment to integrity and transparency with voters has already been exposed as a façade. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-01

In a move that highlights the complex interplay between his political alliances and business priorities, Elon Musk’s Tesla has publicly endorsed California’s climate policy to promote electric vehicles, even as former President Donald Trump, a political ally of Musk, vows to dismantle it if he is reelected. While some Republicans argue that California's plan will drive up gas prices, Musk’s electric car company insists the policy is beneficial both economically and environmentally, supporting California’s low-carbon fuel standard, which sets emissions limits for all transportation fuels sold in the state. Tesla joined other electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers, including Hyundai, GM, Audi, and Rivian, in urging California lawmakers to maintain the low-carbon fuel standard. In a letter to lawmakers on October 24, Tesla and its peers stated, “This program has achieved significant economic and environmental benefits for Californians, and we strongly support its continued advancement to drive even greater progress.” The letter, exclusively obtained by Politico, reflects a unified front among EV manufacturers, despite Musk’s political alliance with Trump. Musk’s support of California’s climate initiatives brings attention to a growing friction between his political and business interests. As Tesla and other EV companies advocate for policies that incentivize the adoption of electric vehicles, Trump has moderated his criticism of EVs in light of Musk’s influence as a campaign surrogate. Nevertheless, Trump remains committed to overturning California’s leading electric vehicle regulations. At a recent rally in Southern California, he declared, “I would not allow California politicians to get away with their plan to impose a 100 percent ban on the sale of gas-powered cars and trucks.” California has set ambitious goals to phase out the sale of combustion engine trucks by 2045 and gas-powered cars by 2035, which Trump has targeted as a key point of opposition. The policy updates proposed for California’s low-carbon fuel standard have also sparked debate among Congressional Republicans. Representatives Michelle Steel and David Valadao, both facing challenging reelection campaigns, joined other Republicans in opposing the amendments. On October 24, they signed a letter urging California regulators to delay the upcoming vote, citing concerns over potential gas price hikes, with state regulators previously estimating the amendments could increase costs by as much as 47 cents per gallon. California Governor Gavin Newsom has consistently backed the low-carbon fuel standard in the face of opposition from the oil industry and state Republicans. He has also pursued measures to address California’s high gas prices, including pushing for greater oversight of oil refiners and advocating for increased ethanol content in gasoline to help lower costs. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is set to vote on the proposed amendments to the low-carbon fuel standard on November 8, a decision that will be closely watched by both supporters and critics. As the state leads the charge for cleaner transportation, Tesla’s endorsement underscores the company’s alignment with California’s environmental goals, even as its founder navigates a complicated political landscape with allies who hold opposing views on the future of clean energy. Based on a report by Politico 2024-11-01

North Korea launched an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on Thursday, marking its longest recorded flight to date. The missile was in the air for an unprecedented 86 minutes, covering over 1,000 kilometers before descending into waters east of North Korea, according to reports from South Korea and Japan. The missile was launched at a sharply angled trajectory, reaching an altitude of around 7,000 kilometers (4,350 miles). Experts indicated that if launched on a flatter, horizontal trajectory, the missile could have achieved a much greater range, signaling North Korea's growing capability to cover extensive distances. The launch comes amid escalating tensions between North and South Korea, with Pyongyang adopting increasingly aggressive language and actions toward Seoul. Just a day before the missile test, South Korea warned that the North could be planning to conduct an ICBM launch close to the U.S. presidential election on November 5. The South Korean defense ministry stated that the recent test appeared aimed at developing capabilities for weapons that could “fire farther and higher.” In response to the test, South Korea announced plans to impose new sanctions on North Korea, a move intended to pressure Pyongyang into halting its missile developments. The United States was quick to condemn the launch as well. In a statement, Sean Savett, spokesperson for the White House’s National Security Council, called it a “flagrant violation of multiple UN Security Council resolutions.” He added that North Korea’s action “only demonstrates that [North Korea] continues to prioritize its unlawful weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programmes over the well-being of its people.” Pyongyang’s recent actions defy international sanctions that have long been in place. The last time North Korea launched an ICBM, in December 2023, the missile stayed airborne for 73 minutes and traveled approximately 1,000 kilometers. In a rare same-day report in North Korean state media, leader Kim Jong Un characterized Thursday's launch as a demonstration of North Korea’s “will to respond to our enemies” and described it as “appropriate military action.” Kim emphasized that “[North Korea] will never change its line of bolstering up its nuclear forces.” Experts believe this latest launch was likely aimed at enhancing the payload capacity of North Korea’s missile technology. Kim Dong-yup, an assistant professor at the University of North Korean Studies, commented that Pyongyang has been developing missiles capable of reaching the U.S. mainland, even with larger and potentially multiple warheads. Japan closely monitored Thursday's launch, while South Korean and U.S. officials convened soon afterward, pledging to “take strong and varied response measures,” according to a statement from the South Korean military. They emphasized the importance of sharing North Korean ballistic information among South Korean, U.S., and Japanese authorities, with the South reaffirming its full readiness to respond to further developments. The launch coincides with growing concerns that North Korea is deepening its alliance with Russia. Recently, South Korean and U.S. authorities accused Pyongyang of sending troops to Russia to support Vladimir Putin's campaign in Ukraine. The Pentagon estimates that approximately 10,000 North Korean soldiers have been deployed to training areas in eastern Russia, with a smaller contingent reportedly stationed in Russia’s west, near Kursk. The U.S. reported earlier this week that thousands more North Korean troops are en route to Russia. While North Korea and Russia have yet to confirm or deny these allegations, the perceived presence of North Korean troops in Russia has only heightened concerns over the burgeoning partnership between Putin and Kim, signaling new complexities in the region’s already fraught dynamics. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-01

Boston Dynamics has released a video of its latest autonomous humanoid robot, Atlas, which can now perform tasks independently with zero human intervention. In this new demonstration, Atlas efficiently completes a sequence of physical tasks typically required in industrial settings. Moving engine covers between containers and skillfully maneuvering a mobile sequencing dolly, the robot simulates factory work, marking a significant milestone in autonomous robotics. The video has garnered mixed reactions on social media, with some users expressing fascination and others finding Atlas’s movements “creepy.” In particular, viewers remarked on Atlas’s impressive flexibility; in one scene, it rises by planting its feet behind its head, demonstrating both strength and precision in reorienting its spinal column to stand upright. This seemingly lifelike flexibility has added to the sense of awe and trepidation surrounding Boston Dynamics’ latest robot. Atlas’s advancements come on the heels of Tesla’s new Optimus humanoid robot, which was showcased earlier this month by CEO Elon Musk. During the unveiling, Optimus models mingled with guests and even pulled pints, impressing onlookers with their conversational abilities, though they were controlled remotely by humans. Experts have suggested that fully autonomous humanoid robots, such as Optimus, may take another decade before they are fully integrated and functional within society. As Atlas demonstrates its capabilities in controlled environments, Boston Dynamics has clearly taken a step forward in the field of autonomous robotics. While fully autonomous robots functioning in public spaces may still be years away, Boston Dynamics’ latest advancements suggest a promising and potentially transformative future for robotics in industry and beyond. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-01

In the office of Rachel Reeves, the new Chancellor, hangs a portrait of Ellen Wilkinson, a bold socialist and one of the founders of the Communist Party of Great Britain. Known as “Red Ellen,” Wilkinson’s legacy as a pioneering Labour education minister and a woman of unyielding political resolve has become an apparent source of inspiration for Reeves as she presented her inaugural Budget in the House of Commons. This act of homage is telling: Reeves recently replaced a portrait of former Chancellor Nigel Lawson with Wilkinson’s likeness in her office at No. 11, a detail revealed in a Treasury photograph the night before her first Budget speech. Wilkinson’s life is a study in defiance and transformation, a theme that resonates with Reeves’s potential aspirations for Labour’s tenure. Ellen Wilkinson read history at the University of Manchester beginning in 1910, a time when higher education was still a rarity for women. Just four years earlier, Christabel Pankhurst had graduated as Manchester’s first-ever female law graduate. Wilkinson’s time at university marked her deep commitment to the labor movement and the women’s movement, initially through the university’s Fabian Society branch and later as a trade union organizer. During her university years, she became romantically involved with Walton Newbold, who later became the UK’s first Communist MP. Though the relationship eventually ended, her passion for political activism only grew. Wilkinson’s fervor for social justice sometimes came at a personal cost. She famously recounted that she sacrificed a First in her degree, receiving instead a 2:1, as she devoted her energy “to a strike raging in Manchester.” Inspired by the 1917 Russian Revolution, she joined members of the Independent Labour Party to co-found the Communist Party of Great Britain in 1920. A year later, she traveled to Moscow to attend a congress, meeting notable communist leaders such as Leon Trotsky and Lenin’s wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya, whose speech deeply influenced Wilkinson. Despite her zeal for revolution, Wilkinson eventually diverged from her Communist Party peers on ideology. She sought a parliamentary seat, running as a Labour candidate in Ashton-under-Lyne in 1923, boldly asserting, “We shall have only one class in this country: the working class.” Though unsuccessful, her second attempt in 1924 secured her a seat as MP for Middlesbrough East, where her active role in Labour continued despite having to resign from the Communist Party due to Labour’s policy against dual membership. Wilkinson’s legacy encapsulates the ideological struggle within Labour, balancing the push for socialism with a more centrist approach, a tension still evident in contemporary party dynamics. Her story embodies a balance of unwavering socialist principles with the pragmatism needed to navigate political structures, a reflection of Labour’s own internal debates that may continue under Keir Starmer’s leadership. For Reeves, Wilkinson’s portrait is more than decoration; it represents a figure she has long admired. In her 2019 book *Women of Westminster: The MPs Who Changed Politics*, Reeves praised Wilkinson’s “defiance, determination, and courage” in breaking into a male-dominated political sphere. With Wilkinson’s portrait now hanging in her office, Reeves’s choice signals a tribute to socialist ideals and the courage to confront entrenched norms. Whether Reeves, as Chancellor, will follow in the steps of Red Ellen, challenging the establishment with a similar revolutionary zeal, or pursue a more tempered approach remains to be seen. Her tenure may ultimately reveal whether she aligns herself with Wilkinson’s vision or if her ambitions, like her decor, will favor a softer tone. Based on a report by the Daily Telegraph 2024-11-01

During his campaign, former President Donald Trump has hinted at a potential government overhaul, proposing roles for controversial figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Elon Musk if he secures the presidency again. While the conservative “Project 2025” outlines a framework for a second Trump administration, Trump himself has expressed ideas that go beyond this, especially in the areas of health and government restructuring. Trump has discussed giving Kennedy a free hand to reform health safety systems. At a rally in Madison Square Garden, Trump declared, “I’m going to let him go wild on the food. I’m going to let him go wild on the medicines.” Kennedy has campaigned on a “Make America Healthy Again” platform, emphasizing regenerative agriculture, toxin-free environments, and natural health practices. However, his stance has raised questions due to his history with conspiracy theories, including his suggestion that chemicals in water could affect gender identity and a past comment equating vaccine mandates to the persecution seen in Nazi Germany. On Monday, Kennedy mentioned that Trump has assured him control over key public health agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Department of Agriculture (USDA). “The key that I think I’m – you know, that President Trump has promised me is – is control of the public health agencies,” Kennedy stated. The exact nature of Trump’s plans for Kennedy remains unconfirmed, but CNN reporter Meg Tirrell highlights the public health community’s concerns, noting that Kennedy’s platform conspicuously avoids the topic of vaccines, despite his past anti-vaccine advocacy. His criticism of vaccines has evolved in recent campaigns, but the skepticism he and Trump share on this issue remains a point of contention. Elon Musk, another prominent figure Trump has proposed to involve in his administration, would be tasked with a radical restructuring of the federal government. Musk has suggested that the federal bureaucracy should be completely rethought, saying, “Let’s start from scratch.” This would involve slashing government spending, possibly through the use of artificial intelligence, and restructuring government efficiency, with Musk humorously suggesting a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), echoing his cryptocurrency interests. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, however, criticized Musk’s proposal to cut $2 trillion from government spending, pointing out, “Only 15% of the federal budget is for payroll. So even if you took every single person working for the federal government out, you couldn’t save anything like $2 trillion.” He added that achieving such cuts would require reductions to Social Security and Medicare—areas Trump has pledged to protect. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Trump ally, recently alluded to another ambitious goal: a “massive” overhaul of the health care system, potentially eliminating the Affordable Care Act (ACA), popularly known as “Obamacare.” At a recent event in Pennsylvania, Johnson confirmed, “No Obamacare,” to cheers from the crowd. Trump himself has yet to reveal a detailed alternative, though he claimed to have “concepts” of a plan. Although he failed to repeal the ACA in his previous term, the notion of reshaping health care remains a priority for his administration. Despite these grand proposals, Trump and his allies would likely encounter significant resistance within the Senate and legal constraints within the Constitution. Although the president holds some authority over the federal workforce, a sweeping restructuring, especially on the scale Musk envisions, would require legislative approval. In Kennedy’s case, Senate confirmation would be necessary if he were nominated to lead HHS. Yet, without specifics in place to match the ideas in Project 2025, it’s uncertain how feasible these drastic changes would be. In conclusion, Trump’s vision of a government overhaul would give RFK Jr. and Musk powerful roles that could radically reshape health policies and government operations. However, the ambitious nature of these plans faces substantial legal and political obstacles that could restrict their implementation if he were to return to the White House. Based on a report by CNN 2024-11-01

There exists an unspoken rule in British public discourse: when an attack occurs with potential links to jihadism or immigration, the public often remains uninformed of a possible motive, at least until withholding this information becomes impractical. This process follows predictable steps. Typically, those who do attempt to discuss likely motives are advised to avoid prejudicing any trial. Public officials often insist that there will be an appropriate time and place to discuss these issues – though, in practice, that opportunity may never arise. Incidents like the murder of Drummer Lee Rigby, the assassination of Sir David Amess, the Ariana Grande concert bombing, and more recently, the Taylor Swift dance class massacre, showcase this pattern. These tragic events reveal a recurring reluctance to fully address the motives behind certain attacks until public curiosity grows too intense to ignore. For now, such violent attacks remain rare in the UK. It is only natural that, alongside outrage, the public might feel curious about how such incidents occur. Yet, when it came to the Southport attack, information from law enforcement seemed notably sparse. This led some to speculate about the motive behind the crime. Had the assailant been a far-right extremist with slogans referencing figures like Oswald Mosley, for instance, the details may have come to light immediately. Or if the attacker had declared, "All Taylor Swift fans must be killed," this, too, would likely have been shared openly. Instead, there was silence. Eventually, a vague statement surfaced on Sky News and other major media outlets, disclosing that the suspect was from Cardiff. This information, rather than satisfying public curiosity, seemed almost incongruous. As some wondered, would any presume a “typical Welshman” behind the crime? Further details then emerged, identifying the suspect as of Rwandan descent, a revelation that momentarily redirected attention. For some, this discovery was sufficient to dismiss any significant implications about the suspect's background. Others pointed to Rwanda’s predominantly Christian demographics and argued that, given the suspect was a child of immigrants rather than a recent arrival, his heritage bore little relevance. The prevalent belief in the multicultural state posits that once someone settles in Britain, they become “as British as roast beef,” regardless of origins. The release of the suspect's name, 18-year-old Axel Rudakubana, brought a new wave of responses. Media outlets strategically displayed images of Rudakubana from his school years, a conscious effort to present him as a young person, though not as young as his victims. As public frustration boiled over, protests erupted in multiple cities, and some individuals resorted to violence, targeting police vehicles, a station, a mosque, and even a hotel housing illegal immigrants. While some perpetrators faced imprisonment for these violent acts, others found themselves arrested simply for speculating online about the attacker or sharing what was deemed “false news,” including suggestions that the attacker might be Muslim. Only this week did further details about the case surface, indicating that the suspect possessed al Qaeda training materials and had attempted to create the deadly toxin ricin. These are significant revelations, vital for Rudakubana’s trial. Yet, the authorities likely became aware of these details early on, possibly within hours of searching Rudakubana’s home. Now, individuals who were criticized for allegedly spreading “fake news” about the attacker’s motives appear to have, in part, anticipated the truth. Like many other people I look forward very much to the day when we get to find out where the truth really lies. Based on a report by the Spectator 2024-11-01

Ofcom has imposed a £100,000 fine on GB News, citing “serious and repeated” violations of impartiality rules after the channel gave then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak what it described as a “mostly uncontested platform” during a broadcast. The program, which aired on February 12, allowed Sunak an hour-long Q&A with a live audience, with Ofcom concluding that the episode failed to present an “appropriately wide range of significant viewpoints” and did not preserve “due impartiality.” While Ofcom issued the fine, it will defer enforcing payment until the conclusion of a judicial review that GB News has initiated to challenge the regulator’s original ruling. Ofcom is set to defend its decision, asserting the severity of the impartiality breaches as justification for the penalty. Additionally, the regulator has ordered GB News to broadcast a public statement of its findings, the timing and format of which will be at Ofcom’s discretion. GB News chief executive Angelos Frangopoulos responded to the fine by calling it a “direct attack on free speech and journalism in the United Kingdom.” He described the sanction as “unnecessary, unfair and unlawful,” emphasizing that the High Court has allowed GB News to seek judicial review to contest Ofcom’s original ruling. “The plan to sanction GB News flies in the face of Ofcom’s duty to act fairly, lawfully and proportionately to safeguard free speech, particularly political speech and on matters of public interest,” Frangopoulos added. He highlighted the role of The People’s Forum, where Sunak was interviewed, as an essential platform for public engagement, asserting that GB News took steps to maintain impartiality in line with the Broadcasting Code. “It was designed to allow members of the public to put their own questions directly to leading politicians,” he stated, further emphasizing the network’s commitment to operating within regulatory boundaries. Frangopoulos underscored the station’s belief in freedom of expression, arguing that Ofcom has a responsibility to apply its rules fairly. “At the People’s Channel we will continue to fearlessly champion freedom; for our viewers, for our listeners, and for everyone in the United Kingdom,” he said, underscoring what he sees as the network’s unique role in the UK media landscape. The People’s Forum episode, which featured Sunak, was intended to be the first in a series offering public access to political figures, according to GB News. The network indicated that Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer had been invited to participate in a similar program, though his appearance did not materialize after Ofcom initiated its investigation. Ofcom’s review found that due impartiality requirements were unmet, as an adequate range of perspectives was not presented nor addressed in other programs. As the legal challenge unfolds, the Ofcom ruling and the subsequent response from GB News will likely spark broader discussions about media impartiality, freedom of expression, and the responsibilities of broadcasters under UK law. Based on a report by Press Gazette 2024-11-01

The United States recently recorded its first instance of bird flu in a pig, raising concerns over the potential for the virus to become a human threat. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced that the infection was found at a small, mixed-animal farm in Crook County, Oregon, a location where different species share water and shelter. Initial testing detected bird flu in poultry at the farm, and further tests this week confirmed that one of the farm's five pigs had also contracted the virus. In response, officials quarantined the farm, and all five pigs were euthanized to allow for more comprehensive testing. The farm operates outside of the commercial supply chain, so the USDA assured the public that the nation’s pork remains safe. However, this case has underscored the potential for bird flu to make a “species jump,” sparking discussions about whether the virus might eventually pose a more significant risk to humans. Jennifer Nuzzo, a pandemic researcher at Brown University, highlighted the concerns this development raises. Pigs are known carriers of various influenza viruses and can play a role in enabling bird viruses to adapt to human hosts. "Pigs can be infected with multiple types of flu, and the animals can play a role in making bird viruses better adapted to humans," Nuzzo explained. Reflecting on past outbreaks, she noted that the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic had swine origins, reinforcing the importance of vigilance. “If we’re trying to stay ahead of this virus and prevent it from becoming a threat to the broader public, knowing if it’s in pigs is crucial,” Nuzzo emphasized. Currently, the USDA has conducted genetic analyses on the infected farm’s poultry and has not found mutations that would suggest an increased likelihood of the virus adapting to humans. This reassures officials that the immediate risk to the public remains low. However, bird flu’s continued spread in the U.S. is a concern. This strain, classified as Type A H5N1, has become widespread among wild birds, poultry, cattle, and several other animals, increasing the potential for human exposure. Troy Sutton, a flu researcher at Penn State, weighed in on the implications of the Oregon case, noting that while it's noteworthy, it does not necessarily indicate a higher level of threat. "It isn’t a one-to-one relationship, where pigs get infected with viruses and they make pandemics,” Sutton clarified. Although the virus has affected many species, he said that a significant cause for concern would arise if the virus started spreading more broadly among pigs and led to human infections. “If the virus starts spreading more widely among pigs and if there are ensuing human infections, then we’re going to be more concerned,” he added. So far in 2024, nearly 40 human cases of bird flu have been reported across California, Colorado, Washington, Michigan, Texas, and Missouri. Fortunately, the reported symptoms have mostly been mild, with the most common being eye redness. All but one of those affected had direct contact with infected animals, suggesting that transmission between humans is not yet a concern. Based on a report by AFP 2024-11-01

Off topic trolling nonsense removed

Just days before Election Day, Vice President Kamala Harris sought to distance herself from President Joe Biden’s remarks that seemingly branded Donald Trump’s supporters as “garbage.” The comment, which sparked a swift backlash, left some Democrats privately frustrated with Biden for igniting a political controversy at such a critical time. "Harris on Biden's "garbage" comment: "I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for..." Biden’s comment and the subsequent fallout have further fueled tensions within the Democratic Party, with some insiders expressing concern over the president’s remarks potentially alienating undecided voters at a crucial moment. In the final stretch of the campaign, Harris’s efforts to publicly distance herself from Biden’s words reflect a strategic move to mitigate any potential damage, reaffirming her commitment to serving all Americans without partisan bias. Based on a report by CNN 2024-10-31

Spain is grappling with its deadliest flood disaster in decades as intense rainfall has claimed at least 95 lives, with many more people still missing. The catastrophic floods, which began on Tuesday, have ravaged the eastern province of Valencia and beyond, submerging communities and leaving a path of destruction. The torrential rains triggered flash floods that overwhelmed the region, destroying bridges and buildings and forcing many people to cling to trees or seek refuge on rooftops. As President Pedro Sánchez declared three days of national mourning, the severe weather continued, further complicating rescue efforts. Expressing deep sorrow for the victims, Sánchez addressed the nation on Wednesday, saying, “The whole of Spain weeps with you… we won’t abandon you.” Officials fear the death toll may rise as the number of missing persons remains high. Of the 95 deaths confirmed so far, 92 occurred in Valencia, two in the neighboring region of Castilla-La Mancha, and one in Málaga. The latter involved a 71-year-old British man who passed away in the hospital after being rescued. The disaster has become Spain’s deadliest flooding event since 1973 when catastrophic floods claimed at least 150 lives in the country’s southeast. In Horno de Alcedo, just outside Valencia, Mayor Consuelo Tarazon described how floodwaters rose by over a meter in a matter of minutes. “The currents were so quick – and we called the emergency services who started rescuing some people who had water up to their necks,” Tarazon shared with *BBC Newshour*. Spain has deployed over 1,000 troops to assist with ongoing rescue efforts, although many areas remain cut off due to flooded roads, power outages, and disrupted communication lines. The European Union responded quickly to Spain's crisis, with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen activating the Copernicus satellite system to help coordinate rescue teams. Neighboring European countries have also offered additional support. Spanish Defense Minister Margarita Robles called the floods "an unprecedented phenomenon" earlier on Wednesday, acknowledging that while various factors contribute to flooding, the intensifying effects of climate change make extreme rainfall more likely. As Spain faces this tragic loss and destruction, the country is bracing for a challenging recovery effort in the weeks and months ahead. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-10-31

Sean “Diddy” Combs has been accused of spiking a 10-year-old boy’s soda and sexually assaulting him during an “audition” at a New York hotel, according to a new lawsuit. The rap mogul also faces claims that he and a bodyguard sexually abused a 17-year-old male teenager who was auditioning for his reality show Making the Band. The two new claims are among more than two dozen allegations of sexual misconduct being faced by Combs, who is behind bars in Brooklyn, New York, after being refused bail. The incident involving the young boy from California, named in the suit only as “John Doe,” happened in 2005 after the aspiring rapper and actor met Combs through a consultant hired by his parents. The boy told Combs he would “do anything” to be a star, says the complaint, before the music tycoon allegedly gave him a soda spiked with drugs, pushed him down, and forced him to perform oral sex. A report from Reuters says that the boy lost consciousness. When he woke up he felt sore and his pants were undone, it continued. The boy said he cried and asked for his parents. The lawsuit contends that Combs told him he would hurt them “badly” if the child disclosed what happened. The 17-year-old claimed he was forced to perform oral sex on Combs and his bodyguard in 2008 as a “test” of how much he wanted to make it in the music business, says the complaint, which adds that he failed the audition because he was deemed “untrustworthy due to his reservations about performing oral sex on his bodyguard.” Based on a report by the Daily Beast 2024-10-31

The number of migrants illegally crossing into the United States under Vice President Kamala Harris may be substantially higher than official figures indicate, according to new findings. The Telegraph reports that illegal crossings are estimated to be 25 percent higher than public records suggest when accounting for so-called "gotaways"—migrants who evade detection. This brings the total to nearly nine million people who have crossed the U.S. border since Harris assumed office and was tasked with addressing the "root causes" of illegal immigration from Central America. Critics argue the White House has understated the scale of illegal crossings, accusing the administration of "laundering" figures to obscure its border security record. According to Simon Hankinson, an immigration research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, "I think it is a deliberate obfuscation. They have essentially laundered illegal immigration.” Monthly data released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection accounts for only those migrants intercepted, totaling approximately 7.15 million since President Joe Biden and Harris took office. However, a Freedom of Information request by The Telegraph reveals an estimated 1.8 million gotaways have crossed the border undetected from February 2021 through September 2024. Due to their evasion of Border Patrol, the precise paths of these individuals remain largely unknown. The head of Border Patrol, Jason Owens, voiced concerns in February over the number of gotaways, describing the situation as a "national security threat." Reflecting on the unknowns surrounding these individuals, Owens questioned, “What do they have to hide? What are they bringing in? What is their intent? Where are they coming from? We simply don’t know the answers to those questions.” While the issue of migrant encounters versus gotaways isn’t unique to the Biden administration, Hankinson suggests that “gotaways, almost by definition, are going to be more likely to have criminal records and to be undesirable than people who show up and surrender to the border force.” Some 80 percent of those apprehended between 2021 and 2023 were either deported or immediately turned back, a rate double that of the early 2000s under George W. Bush. Harris has recently pledged to enhance border security, stating that if she wins the presidency in November, she would ensure migrants crossing illegally are barred from entry. However, critics on the Republican side contend that Harris has failed in her role as "border tsar," struggling to address the issue adequately. Polls indicate immigration remains a top priority for voters, with Trump generally viewed as more capable in managing it. Notably, the surge in gotaways under the previous administration’s use of Title 42 expulsions during the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to the rising figures. Title 42 allowed for the rapid expulsion of migrants, often without a hearing, which some experts argue inadvertently encouraged migrants to attempt crossings repeatedly. David J. Bier, an immigration analyst at the Cato Institute, referred to the practice as "self-defeating," explaining, “At the same time, you’re giving them no reason to turn themselves in to the Border Patrol because you’re saying you can’t apply for asylum.” The current administration’s cessation of Title 42 in May 2023 saw a reduction in gotaways, dropping from 56,003 in May to 30,116 the following month. This trend continued, with gotaway numbers through September 2024 reported to be less than half of those from the same period in the prior year. Victor Manjarrez, a former Border Patrol chief for Arizona, pointed out that crossing the U.S.-Mexico border remains challenging due to the vast deserts and limited surveillance, which people-smuggling gangs exploit. Ultimately, Customs and Border Protection estimates its gotaway figures using an array of surveillance methods, including CCTV, motion sensors, aerial surveillance, and tracking disturbances along the border. Based on a report by the Daily Telegraph 2024-10-31

In a notable shift, USA Today and over 200 other newspapers owned by Gannett have chosen not to endorse a candidate in the upcoming presidential election. This move aligns with decisions from other major publications, such as the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times, which have also decided to forgo endorsements. “None of the USA Today Network publications are endorsing in presidential or national races,” confirmed Lark-Marie Antón, spokesperson for USA Today, in an interview with The Hill. While Gannett’s publications are refraining from backing candidates in national races, Antón clarified that they still retain the “discretion” to endorse at state or local levels. She explained that some newspapers may opt to endorse key issues impacting their communities rather than individual candidates. “Many have decided not to endorse individual candidates, but rather, endorse key local and state issues on the ballot that impact the community,” said Antón. “Why are we doing this? Because we believe America’s future is decided locally — one race at a time,” she added. With over 200 publications spread across the nation, Gannett aims to serve readers by providing them with “the facts that matter and the trusted information they need to make informed decisions.” Gannett’s decision is particularly significant given the company’s ownership of influential papers in swing states, such as the Arizona Republic and the Detroit Free Press, where endorsements have the potential to sway voters. The Washington Post, owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, has faced backlash for its own decision to stay silent on the presidential endorsement front. In an op-ed published on Monday, Bezos defended the move, calling it “right” and “principled,” and dismissed speculation that it was motivated by business interests. The decision has led to significant fallout, with NPR reporting on Monday that more than 200,000 people canceled their subscriptions to the Washington Post, citing “two people at the paper with knowledge of internal matters.” Bezos expressed regret over the timing of the decision, which he believes should have been made sooner. “Ending [endorsements] is a principled decision, and it’s the right one,” he wrote, adding, “I wish this decision to end presidential endorsements had been made earlier, in a moment further from the election and the emotions around it. That was inadequate planning, and not some intentional strategy.” The Los Angeles Times also recently announced it would not be endorsing a candidate, acknowledging that the decision has led to a loss of subscribers. Despite the reactions, these major outlets appear firm in their belief that withholding endorsements offers readers an unbiased platform at a time when media credibility is often questioned. Based on a report by NYP 2024-10-31

President Biden’s recent remarks, where he referred to former President Donald Trump’s supporters as “garbage,” have stirred political controversy, with Trump using the incident to rally his supporters. Speaking to a crowd in Allentown, Pennsylvania, Trump urged his supporters to “forgive” Biden for his choice of words. President Biden, aware of the stir his comments had caused, also addressed the issue directly on social media, aiming to clarify his intentions. Writing on X (formerly Twitter), Biden said, “Earlier today I referred to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump’s supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage—which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable. That’s all I meant to say. The comments at that rally don’t reflect who we are as a nation.” Despite the White House’s efforts to clarify, the incident underscores the delicate balance Biden must maintain in an already polarized political climate. Some analysts suggest that the comment could have already inflicted damage, giving Trump an opening to remind his base of past moments when mainstream politicians dismissed or criticized his supporters. As Biden works to unite a divided electorate, his “garbage” remark may be yet another instance where his words echo in ways that carry unintended consequences. Based on a report by CNN 2024-10-31

An animator for Disney and Pixar orchestrated rapes of young girls in the Philippines that were livestreamed to his devices in France and the US, a court heard on Tuesday. Bolhem Bouchiba, 59 – whose film credits include Ratatouille, Up and The Incredibles – is accused of ordering livestreams of more than 1,000 acts of sexual and physical abuse. The father of two boys appeared in a Paris criminal court on Tuesday on charges of complicity in repeated rapes and sexual assaults on minors, human trafficking and child pornography offences. He faces life imprisonment if convicted. The victims in the Philippines ranged in age from as young as three to 15. The offences are alleged to have taken place between 2012 and 2021 when the graphic designer lived in the west of France and the US. According to documents seen by Le Figaro, on Bouchiba’s orders, the adults, often poverty-stricken mothers, relatives or neighbours, tortured young girls. He also told investigators he ordered mothers to manipulate the positions of children on the livestreams because he “couldn’t see very well, perverted as I was, I wanted to see”. In the Philippines, about one in three people live below the poverty line. Le Figaro reported that one in 100 children is thought to be a victim of sexual violence in exchange for money. Bouchiba’s arrest in 2021 came after Europol reported suspicious financial transactions from the Frenchman to a Filipina national, known to authorities as the local “money-maker” who centralised payments for sexually exploiting minors. Prosecutors estimate he spent £41,600 for up to 1,000 acts of sexual abuse over nine years. He also raised red flags with American authorities at a San Francisco airport in 2020 for having lied about his past as a sexual offender. Bouchiba was convicted of sexually assaulting an eight-year-old girl in 2014 and served a two-year suspended sentence. Testimonies from his family in court documents, however, used words like “caring”, “gentle” and “kind” to describe him. “The image of the single paedo-criminal, living alone and unemployed is completely erroneous,” commissioner Gabrielle Hazan, of the office of minors, told Le Figaro. “Perpetrators of sexual violence against minors span all ages, all socio-professional categories, all regions.” Bouchiba admitted watching child pornography on his smartphone but denied having downloaded any of the content. The trial continues. Based on a report by the Daily Telegraph 2024-10-31

Scientists believe they may have found clues to the location of Noah's Ark on what could be the world’s oldest map. This 3,000-year-old Babylonian artifact has long baffled archaeologists, but recent breakthroughs suggest it may offer directions to the fabled ark. The artifact, a clay tablet discovered in the Middle East and housed at the British Museum since 1882, displays map-like symbols along with paragraphs of cuneiform on its backside. These writings describe the Earth's formation and boundaries, portraying ancient Mesopotamia—modern-day Iraq—encircled by a “Bitter River,” a double-ring barrier marking the known world’s limits, an artifact often called the Imago Mundi. Over the last month, researchers have decoded portions of these inscriptions, and now believe they reference Biblical tales. They propose that the tablet’s reverse side serves as a guide for a journey, detailing landmarks and potential hazards. One passage describes a vessel “thick as a parsiktu,” a measurement that hints at the size required for a boat capable of surviving a great flood. This interpretation stems from other ancient Babylonian texts, which detail the construction of such a vessel to survive a catastrophic deluge. Another passage seems to give directions toward “Urartu,” the legendary resting place of an ark, believed to be situated in modern Turkey’s mountainous regions, where Noah and his family reportedly landed after the 150-day flood. Dr. Irving Finkel, a cuneiform specialist at the British Museum, suggests the tablet’s description aligns with that of Noah’s Ark. He explains, “Because it is the description of the Ark which was built, theoretically, by the Babylonian version of Noah.” In the Babylonian version of the flood story, similar to the Biblical account, a god named Ea sent a flood to cleanse humanity, sparing only one family. The chosen survivor, Utnapishtim, received divine instructions to build an ark and fill it with animals. During six months of flooding, Utnapishtim and his family endured the storm, finally finding refuge atop one of Urartu’s peaks as the waters receded. Finkel notes that the Babylonian account meticulously details the ark’s construction, including the god's specific commands, with Utnapishtim replying, “I did this, this and this. I’ve done it!” He even describes building the vessel with the thickness of a “parsiktu” vessel, emphasizing the ark’s sturdiness. The similarities between the Babylonian flood tale and the Biblical account of Noah’s Ark have long intrigued scholars. Babylonian stories, like the *Epic of Gilgamesh*, which also recounts a great flood, date back over 3,000 years. In contrast, the Biblical flood is believed to have occurred around 5,000 years ago. This recent analysis adds weight to the theory that both stories may share common origins. Though debate continues over whether Mount Ararat in Turkey, mentioned in Babylonian texts, truly exists, the map’s inscriptions offer a fascinating new perspective. According to Finkel, “It shows that the story was the same, and of course that one led to the other, but also, that from the Babylonian point of view, this was a matter of fact thing. That if you did go on this journey you would see the remnants of this historic boat.” While the claim of locating Noah’s Ark remains speculative, the discovery of an ancient map that might provide directions to its resting place offers an intriguing chapter in the ongoing search for historical truths behind ancient myths. Based on a report by NYP 2024-10-31