oldlakey

3 hours ago, The manic said:

The murder was not a consequence of her actions otherwise every man and woman who were unfaithful would be murdered. Her tragic death is caused by a sick, twisted inadequate excuse for a man and apologists like you who seek to blame victims.

Sorry my man you are wrong because we all react differently to any situation, thus we get different outcomes

Your actions can have dire consequences with some people, as in this case

It's a cruel world when it comes home to roost

7 hours ago, Artisi said:

I'm well aware of real life, I've lived it long enough, and hopefully for a bit longer yet. 

As for this murder, I am simply saying "don't blame the victim" what ever she did, had done, and planned on doing, being murdered wasn't her doing / fault. 

It's a bit like our intelligent leader's comment, "if you're attractive and wear a bikini, it's your fault if you get raped" 

 

As usual I have a good day every day, just about to head out for a relaxing lunch with a couple of friends to engage in some meaningful discussions which won't include victim blaming for being murdered. 

I am not going to reiterate my opinion / position on these events simply because they have not changed, and without checking I am going to assume that my Posts are still there for your viewing

Now my man as far as I am concerned this is a "DEAD" end thread and it is best left that way before we step on somebodies toes

The reason this thread has popped up on the notifications after approx a month is because a fellow member has quoted an old Post

At first I thought "YES" an update but not to be

Maybe I have missed some events / news / updates on these events if so hopefully you can help me out by updating yours truly

It appears to me that its waiting for the attention of whoever

Far be it from me to suggest anything is not quite above board here

If you do by any chance happen upon "Wallop" do kindly inform the RTP

Yes my man, it's a cruel world if you come from the wrong side of the tracks

7 hours ago, Dmaxdan said:

I think these villagers are going a bit 'Ogre' the top with this! 

Probably a troll on leave from Thaivisa

7 hours ago, from the home of CC said:

Sounds like the crap I grew up with, the 'virgin' mary and the 'holy ghost'. And I came from a well educated society.

That c&%p started more than 2000 years ago more fool you if you or yours believe it, this is happening today my man

7 hours ago, ratcatcher said:

"amongst others"

The two most important words of your post. Backwards as many think Thailand is, it has a lot of competition from other countries around the world when it comes to superstition and religion.

This is neither its just laughable ignorance

8 hours ago, Vacuum said:

Education would be a waste of time with these villagers....

A bit of road sense might just of saved one of them

5 minutes ago, dorchester said:

Wait until you get to vietnam.Need to go to airport? Better leave 6hrs early.The grab taxi's are complety lost when it comes to navigation,even when using google maps/Gps with the ear piece. 

Try one of the alternatives

1 hour ago, Damrongsak said:

Beer and bones.  Life in Loei. 

 

AH des res

9 hours ago, bluesofa said:

I have to agree with you on that, unless I've missed something?

 

Yes you missed the skin, the traditional sauce they are normally cooked in is rather nice, overall not to healthy I would guess

Luckily it's mainly a Chinese thing

Time to start cloning Big Joke

14 hours ago, Tailwagsdog said:

Instead of testing clubbers having a night out, spontaneous roadside testing of every driver ( bus, taxi, govt, with no exceptions) pulled over for meth & alcohol testing would send the right message. Happens allover the world.

You are into this happens all over the world business aren't you

Careful or others will be noticing 

14 hours ago, Tailwagsdog said:

Hey bloggers, these accidents happen all over the world, stop turning everything that happens into a 'thai' thing. 

They happen quite often for this company in "Thailand"

1 hour ago, BradWilkins said:

Wow I put a post detailing and questioning the diagnosis made by a doctor 10 years ago at Koh Samui hospital, with not finding I had 4 broken ribs, and it got deleted. Very surprising.

What having your post removed or encountering a Muppet masquerading as a Doctor

2 hours ago, cat handler said:

 

Thats fair enough, you really don’t need insurance once your past 70 because if you get sick you will most probably die anyway.

OK, but not today please

2 hours ago, wotsdermatter said:

You are correct,  When I travel by plane, which is often, I always book wheelchair assistance as I experience difficulty with walking, especially the distances that are often encountered at airports.  It actually works in my favour because I usually circumvent the long lines at Immigration.

 

'nuf sed

This poor chap "CANNOT" walk that's a little more than experiencing difficulty in walking

The airline does not provide personal care now does it, so how would that bridge be crossed

I will tell you, you don't cross that bridge because you wont be allowed to fly on a schedule flight

6 hours ago, wgdanson said:

Most Travel Insurance policies that I have examined only cover for a maximum of 31 days in any one trip. 

You dont buy off the peg you buy exactly want you want, at one time in my life I had Travel insurance coverage for many months at a time

Applicable world wide apart from the USA, I could never work out why 55555555

It came in handy just the once and it cost Norwich Union an absolute packet

8 hours ago, smedly said:

better still someone come from the UK and take him home, so he is in a wheelchair and can't talk, how does that stop him from flying

Try that with Emirates, when I was recovering from Guillain- Barre Syndrome the only way they would let me fly was if I could walk from the entrance door to my seat

There was no problem in any of the airports KL, Dubai or Heathrow wheel chair or electric buggy all the way, last off and last on though 5555555

9 hours ago, Vacuum said:

 

If he was "speeding", why did he drive on the far left line? Normaly the speedsters would use the right hand part of the road.

I dont know what he was doing, but I do know what he was not doing

He was not riding with "Due Care and Attention"

10 minutes ago, Benmart said:

There seems to be plenty of experienced accident investigation experts in this forum that were at the scene. Credentials and your report please.

This is just another case, one of many I am afraid of the lack of any kind of driving / riding skills or road sense

No special experience needed to recognize stupidity and the all encompassing death wish

It takes dedication on a large scale to produce 25,000 plus dead on an annual basis

5 hours ago, thonglorjimmy said:

Why was it thought appropriate to include a photo of some lottery tickets in the photograph of the scene of the accident? 

Because his number was up

5 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

Wow she was going at a fair ole lick !!

Guess if you're medically impaired you should make the judgement call to say no more driving/riding and hang up the keys... but then this is Thailand...

No judgement needed as we can see, at least she went alone

7 hours ago, seancbk said:

New video?

This was posted to Youtube in Dec 2017, almost a year ago.   

 

Well it had no discernible effect last time so they are giving it another go

5 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

When approaching traffic lights, its a safe assumption that scores of vehicles will jump the lights a number of seconds after the light has turned red... 

... When riding my motorcycle its a safe assumption that a car will turn across my path...  I don't know they will, but I assume they might...

 

All par for the course in Thailand... 

 

In this case...  we don't know the bike jumped the light and can only judge on experience and probability given our experience. Without further proof we can only speculate.

 

I'd speculate that the bike went through a red light. I speculate that it was too late for the car to stop at the lights as it changed to amber. I can see the car cut across the bike. 

 

If this were 'car on car' one car turns right, another coming towards him jumps the light they collide... 50/50...  50% blame on the vehicle jumping the light, 50% blame on the vehicle committed to turning right when the road was not 100% clear and he assumed the bike would stop for the light. 

 

Just because a motorcycle was involved I don't think fault is diminished for jumping the light (if it could be proven). 

 

What about turning left??? - the amount of times I am about to turn left and have to emergency brake for the motorcycle riding down the pavement and across my path, or the motorcycle cutting up my inside.... On both occasions the road is not 100% clear to make the maneuver... however, IMO the motorcycle would clearly be 100% to blame in these scenarios...

 

Thus, It could be argued that in jumping the lights (if the motorcycle actually did jump the lights) that the motorcycle is primarily to blame... 

 

All in all, this is an interesting debate on the varying options of road users.... 

The only option is to use your brain, then some people would live to drive / ride another day