Jump to content

katatonic

Member
  • Posts

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by katatonic

  1. 52 minutes ago, Kwasaki said:

    I really don't understand people wanting to take cannabis other sick people, that is my view and my opinion. 

    In England we called people who took it for just getting high smack heads. 

    You are a little confused aren't you? Smack is heroin, rather a different kettle of fish. Presumably you're not actually English though, as it doesn't seem to be your first language.

    • Haha 1
  2. Phuket are providing an affidavit with four options for reasons for wanting to stay in or not being able to leave Thailand, one of which is not being able to get an embassy letter (not really making sense but then..) and seemed to give visas to all applicants yesterday. Seven day 'under consideration' stamps then apparently a further 7 week stamp after that, which my wife reckons is designed to put off those who don't want to pay 1900 baht twice..

  3. 18 hours ago, alianware said:

    What do these ambassador have to do with tourists ?? Tourists will only come if there will be no stupid visa regulation and other requirement. These ambassador cannot ask mass tourists to come even if they want to.

    Have you never accessed your country's embassy website? These people write the official guidelines for tourism from their respective countries, so totally relevant to tourism even in the current situation, which can change. Pretty obvious, not sure why it needs pointing out.

    • Like 1
  4. 17 hours ago, anterian said:

    This is just one of the many perks that ambassadors and their staff and families enjoy, so remote from us plebs who pay their salaries, relocation costs medical expenses and pensions. 

    This is actually what they do for a living: represent their countries and accept official invitations.

    • Like 1
  5. 3 hours ago, from the home of CC said:

    real 'tourists' will utilize the voa. Real 'tourists' live in another country and are coming for a holiday and presumably have a job they have to return to. Living on the border of the US  for 40 years I entered frequently, their main concern? did I have a job back in Canada? which would necessitate my return. Most countries have a similar concern. They don't want a bunch of foreigners running around doing whatever they deem necessary to keep living there including breaking laws and  offering bribes. I have friends (retired) that apply for a tourist visa every year, they usually spend 3 months. They are real long stay tourists, in my home country we call them snowbirds. They are not wealthy by any standards but will have absolutely no problem providing this requirement. But as I say, these are real tourists not folks trying to circumvent laws to live in another country..  

    Which VOA would that be?

  6. 4 hours ago, dunroaming said:

    Just like in China, a Mia Noi (concubine in China and a mistress to the rest of us) is common practice and the majority of wives know about them.  In fact some wives actively encourage their husbands to have one as long as they retain their status as wife number one.  The Mia Noi gets all the perks of being a mistress.  She gets wined and dined, often her housing and expenses are paid for and of course lot's of little gifts to keep her sweet.

     

    I would say don't try to put western values on this but quite honestly things are not that different in the West either.  You just need deeper pockets there.

    Yes, I have worked for lots of super-wealthy men, who predominantly do have mia-nois. Chinese (including BKK/Singapore/HK) especially but French and Italians too. The Chinese have houses in Sentosa and megayachts, the Europeans have chateaux and titles as well. Americans and Brits have pre-nups..

  7. 21 hours ago, ukrules said:

    If only there was some kind of law which required people to sit in an actual seat and wear a seat belt.

     

    Oh wait, there is, they just choose to ignore it with zero enforcement ????

    The list just released of new traffic fines has only one relating to seat belts: that the driver must wear one. No mention of passengers, front or back, oddly. Another one requires all motorbike passengers to wear a helmet.. And I can't wait to see the new 'must pull over if another vehicle signals they want to pass' regulation being enforced ????.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...