Bkk Brian

Only a court can decide that. U.S. has no evidence Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, Defense Secretary Austin says

US Secretary of State Blinken urged Hamas to quickly reach a decision on Israel's "extraordinarily generous” conditions for a temporary cease-fire in Gaza. "The only thing that’s standing between the people of Gaza and a cease-fire is Hamas,”

5 individual incidents. All in West Bank and all before Oct 7th "Four of these units have effectively remediated these violations, which is what we expect partners to do," Patel said. In the case of a fifth unit, Washington has not yet determined whether there has been sufficient remediation and was still in discussions with Israel, he said. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-found-five-israeli-military-units-committed-gross-human-rights-violations-2024-04-29/ https://archive.ph/XfT3E

The ball is in Hamas's court yet again. Why aren't the protestors shouting for this. Blinken says he hopes Hamas takes ‘extraordinarily generous’ truce offer, hostage deal, makes ‘right decision’ RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — US Secretary of State Antony Blinken says he is hopeful Hamas would accept an “extraordinarily generous” offer to halt Israel’s offensive in Gaza in return for the release of hostages. “Hamas has before it a proposal that is extraordinarily, extraordinarily generous on the part of Israel,” Blinken says in Riyadh at the World Economic Forum. “They have to decide — and they have to decide quickly,” Blinken says. “I’m hopeful that they will make the right decision.” https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/blinken-says-he-hopes-hamas-takes-extraordinarily-generous-truce-offer-makes-right-decision/

B.S. You claimed. My post here is certainly not an example of that habit you claim I have:

Didn't hear you pipe up when Russia moved nuclear weapons to Belarus.

That’s you engaging in your habit of inventing the views of those whose real views you can’t handle. Can you link and quote to that?

? Who did I claim refuted that? You watched the BBC interview? Why are you asking me when she left? did you not get a clue when she talked about the Israel lawyers submissions on the 24th March? Yes of course its valid today until the final decision in a few years time.

We can all get links from the BBC and plenty of other places, that is not however the Hard Talk interview where former ICJ President clarifies that it did not decide that the claim of genocide was plausible.

I was referring to ICJ not ICC

You claimed the BBC interview but wont say what was said. Why?

What did I claim? How do you know what I know?

So you claim to have watched all the BBC version of the interview, I asked you what was said about that specific issue. No, you make claims I will ask you about them, you asking me to desist will not change that.

😴 yea right

I've read the rulings, on Jan 26th when it was issued and further to the 28th March when SA returned to court. Your claim: "there is little evidence of Israel complying with that ruling." From a couple of weeks ago: WATCH: U.S. has no evidence Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, Defense Secretary Austin says Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Tuesday rebuffed arguments that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/09/us-has-seen-no-evidence-that-israel-has-committed-genocide-austin-says-00151241

Baseless accusations that have nothing to do with what ICJ said which was: "Donoghue also said that the lawyers "in the room" in Israel were in the best place to make sure that Israel was complying with the order." When asked how the planned invasion of Rafah fits into Israel's compliance with the court order, she told HARDtalk that the court had made no explicit ruling on the military operations in Gaza. "It can't be said that continuing the operation itself violates the order," she said. "But quite clearly, the threats about going into Rafah are why South Africa went back to the court and why the court imposed additional, more precise measures." I am surprised you missed that seeing as you claim to have watched it.

Poor and dishonest deflection when you know as well as I that the ICJ is Joan Donoghue at the time she was there when the ruling was made and also when SA asked for extra measures. Again where are you basing your claim that there is little evidence they are complying. Where are you getting this information from?

Here is what you said: If you claim that where are you getting it from? Because its not from former ICJ Joan Donoghue. I watched the full vid twice. She indeed does talk about it which if you had watched it as you claim you would know exactly what she said about it as its specifically relevant.

And that was? You claim there is little evidence of Israel complying, what did Joan Donoghue say about that when asked the same thing.

That's what I asked you and seeing as you went to the source video and watched it. You should know what she said about that?

Ignorant rant with baseless accusations

How would you know there is little evidence of Israel complying. You said you watched the BBC version of the Former International Court of Justice President Joan Donoghue interview. If so you will know what she said about that yes?

So Netanyahu partially funded No, not correct at all, do your research

These kids have Iran and Yemen rooting for them, they are being useful idiots for them

In the future, people will wonder how such an IMO atrocious state Yes we can see now you have no qualms about your openly anti-Semitic hate speech.