Jump to content

CG1 Blue

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    4,073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

CG1 Blue's Achievements

Gold Member

Gold Member (8/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • 5 Reactions Given
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

8.7k

Reputation

  1. There's a big difference between fondling in a bar with the lady's consent, and forcefully grabbing a girl's baps on the street without consent. It's a bit worrying you don't see any difference.
  2. Ah the Hamas sympathiser is back. "Hamas don’t want the destruction of Israel, granted, they used to" And deluded. It's in their charter.
  3. Haven't yet. Let's discuss when people have actually been returned.
  4. No, but what they did was much worse. Human rights lawyers prevented us from sending migrants offshore for processing. Offshore processing is the only true deterrent. Shortly before Rwanda was to be implemented we already saw migrants diverting to Ireland, much to the disgust of the Irish. Offshore processing stopped boat crossing to Australia almost over night. And, a return deal with the EU? I assume that was a joke 🙄
  5. When will we see the lefty activists out on the streets of the UK with anti-Hamas and 'free the hostages' placards? I won't hold my breath.
  6. Yet they managed to charge, try and convict Lucy Connelly and others connected to the Southport riots in record time. The CPS are busy until it comes to anybody right of centre.
  7. Has the Palestinian government recognised the state of Israel yet?
  8. Because I see the impact this situation is having on friends and family back home, and in towns and cities across the UK. Streets unsafe for women and children. The people with a 'nothing to see here' mentality are helping to maintain the status quo. While support remains for allowing undocumented young men with unknown backgrounds to wander our streets, it's less likely the government will do anything radical to change it. It wasn't personal.
  9. Now you use the same strange words again. Do you know me? No, not at all. So, be careful with those statements which shows a lot about yourself. Do you deny what I said then? Please explain yourself if you do deny it, rather than making veiled threats. "be careful with those statements". Will you report me to Kier Stalin?
  10. The migrant hotels scheme costs the UK tax payer over £5 billion a year. 85% of those coming over on boats are young men, most are undocumented and we know nothing about their backgrounds, These men are free to roam the streets and are committing proportionally more sexual crimes than Brits, despite being paid-for guests. People in towns and cities across the UK are seeing some of these men hang around schools, loitering in high streets, harassing young girls and women and sometimes sexually assaulting them. 'People like you', by turning a blind eye to all this and justifying it are enabling it. There, I dared 🙄
  11. Stats are not your strong suit are they. Ever heard of proportionality? "Including those with unknown nationality in the foreign national category would mean non-British suspects were responsible for 40.6% of the charges. Excluding them places the figure at 37.8%." "despite foreign nationals accounting for less than a quarter of London’s population" You would expect foreigners seeking 'asylum' or hoping to make a life in the UK would behave impeccably. Yet proportionally they're committing significantly more sexual crimes. And people like you seem quite happy with that.
  12. Totally agree. The boat crossings would stop immediately if this were to be implemented. Or even better, build a secure detention centre on the Falklands for those seeking asylum. They managed to build the Nightingale hospitals during Covid in a matter of weeks, so why not pop-up detention centres in offshore British territories? And make them secure so the locals don't have to worry about girls and women being harassed, molested and worse. But let's remember, Starmer is an ex Human Rights lawyer. All his old lawyer pals are raking in the money while the UK remains the most attractive place to go for migrants. That's probably why Starmer seems happy to let this continue. After all he'll be looking for a job once he gets kicked out of office.
  13. The immigrants in 1930s Germany were not committing acts of terror, blowing up tube trains and kids' concerts, or raping thousands of German kids. It's pointless comparing the climate in 1930s Germany to that in Europe now.
  14. How much spending money do you propose we give per week to, let's say a 25 year old man from Eritrea? And what do you think he needs to buy with this extra cash? Bear in mind he already has living expenses covered, plus medical/dental and legal expenses. Also bear in mind the UK economy is already in dire straits.
  15. The 70 quid per week is just spending money. They have zero living expenses because that's all paid for by the British payers. Are you really that out of touch with what's going on?
×
×
  • Create New...