What I find hilarious is that it seems to me, that:
All the people making excuses for hamas all claim they are not making excuses for hamas.
All the most biased people swear THEY are unbiased but accuse others of being biased.
All the people that are unable to support their arguments, demand others support their arguments, and them ignore the support provided.
All the people that make the most bone-headed claims seem to play the dead children card when they get called on it, pretending anyone that disagrees with them does not care about dead children.
I think we all agree there are too many dead children, and we would like to see the killing stopped.
I think everyone would like to see the hostages released, the fighting to end, and for Israel and Palestine to coexist peacefully.
Many people claim Israel and hamas are doing the same thing they've always done, but I don't see it that way. I think this time Israel has had enough, and I think they're going the distance this time win or lose. I hope they win, I know a lot of you hope they lose, whatever.
I thought the cancer analogy (with hamas being the cancer) was a good one. Someone said the cancer has to be cut out, and someone else said no, we need to know the cause of the cancer. When you go to the doctor with cancer, they don't look for the cause, they cut the cancer out. Are people looking for the cause? Absolutely. Will finding the cause save a lot of people in the future? Absolutely. Is that going to help the people with cancer now? No. They will all be dead by the time the cause is determined.