Yellowtail

Biden will be re-elected with a wide margin. Every time I see him speak, I am reminded of the "let's feed grampa" scene in the original "Texas Chainsaw Massacre".

If you're talking about me claiming placeholder called the writer a liar, I stand by that. When you claim someone should not be believed, to my way of thinking, you are effectively calling them a liar. You see it differently. Just like when someone says "I am not excusing hamas, but...", to me, it seems like they are making excuses for hamas. In any event, I never asked anyone to ignore my clams, you just made that up. I'm glad you brought it up, because unlike you, I want to try to support my position, not just make some lame comment like: "Lol, you really have no clue." Weak.

Another well thought out response from the left.

Mostly demonstrations by Muslim immigrants and stupid kids

Still waiting for you to support your claims/lies that Israel has killed a million innocent Palestinians since the 7th, and that Briton is sending an aircraft carrier. You, placeholder and stevenl go together perfectly.

You're lying, I never said I should be ignored when I make false claims.

False

Biden tried to give/release $6B (or was it $8B?) to Iran, and has since tried to take it back/re-freeze it. Why do you think that is if not because of the Jews?

Yes, and I'm not making excuses but but but ...

A gold crown is a gold crown, but it's not pure gold. I think they make a wax crown, coat it with ceramic, burn the wax out and cast the crown with molten gold.

Once again you have nothing.

Yeah, any boat becomes an "aircraft carrier" when it has a helicopter on it. And then finds an article about a WW1 aircraft carrier with the same name and tries to say that was the ship being sent. Too funny

"Not that I doubt that Iran helps Hamas but this Matthew Levitt person works for the Washington Institute of Near East Policies: So his assertions don't amount to much in the way of reliable evidence." You're not calling him a liar, you're just claiming he's not to be believed, got it.

Only the people making false claims. He did say: "Not that I doubt that Iran helps Hamas but this Matthew Levitt person works for the Washington Institute of Near East Policies: So his assertions don't amount to much in the way of reliable evidence." Any I guess to a leftist, perhaps that is not calling someone a liar, but to me it is. He also makes excuses for hamas, and then claims he is not making excuses for hamas, which I think is a common leftist thing as well. I'm not excusing hamas, but....

So you don't doubt that Iran helps hamas, but you call Matthew Levett a liar for claiming Iran helps hamas. That makes as much sense as about anything you claim

Wrong. While most do want to take all of Israel, they want do not want to kick them out, they want to rape and kill them, and perhaps ransom as many as they can.

And it will pay off in the long run. Nothing you have said Mr. Links has said it wouldn't. In any event, he tried to give to them, and they'd be spending it now but for those pesky Jews. So, what do you think, $20 billion to hamas for the 20 American hostages?

Trump's fault, got it.

That's hilarious... Why? Liars need to be called out for what they are. Well, you can't say that anymore.

Yeah, Biden tried to give it to them, then had to pull it back... Be nice if we still had Bagram...

It is worth noting that the same poster claiming no direct connection between Iran and hamas, also claims that that Israel has killed over a million innocent Palestinians since the 7th!

Here you go liar, this is what you said:

Yes, I know the number is ridiculous, but so is most of what you claim. So again, please support your claim that Israel has killed over a million innocent Palestinians since the 7th, or admit you were lying.

what kind of job do you have that leaves you exhausted with no time for the kids?