Yellowtail

It was likely a targeted missile site bombed that resulted in a lot of terrorists killed and a some civilians killed and when the smoke cleared, all the dead were called civilians. Should Israel not bomb sites in Palestine that are firing rockets at Israel? If not, why?

Sigh...unfortunately not fast enough for you. How many dead children will it take for you to call on the Palestinians to take the moral high-ground and release the hostages and initiate a ceasefire?

All the missiles on an F-16 are precision weapons yes. Do some miss? Sure. But are they just dropped out of the aircraft willy-nilly? No, that's ridiculous. An example of indiscriminate bombing would be the hundreds of missiles Palestine fires at Israel from hospitals, mosques, apartment buildings, schools and whatnot. But you claimed people watching a bomb explode can tell whether or not it was fired indiscriminately, are you going to support that claim, or (like I assumed) were you just making it up?

No

Thanks MrBlowsJoe, but I think we're clear.

Yeah, I remember you redefined apartheid to include anything Israel does that you don't like. Carry on.

Yes, we all agree that the death toll on Gaza is horrendous. It is time the Palestinians take the moral high-ground and release the hostages and initiate a ceasefire. How many more Jews have to die before their bloodlust is satisfied?

How is it utter nonsense? Just because you say so? Please explain how anyone seeing a bomb explode can tell that the person that fired it, did so indiscriminately? If you are going to make stuff up, try to make stuff up that is at least possible.

What figures?

Yeah, sure. I linked to it two or three days ago, just do a search.

No, you weren't being "upfront and honest", far from it. You lied and and used it countless times, and after you got called out for lying you redefined it. Just like you've redefined any number of things like "indiscriminate" and "civilians" and "children", you just haven't admitted it yet.

I thought that was you Jar-Jar...

So as long as Trump believed he could make Mexico pay for the wall, he was not lying, and if he believed his property was worth what he said it was worth, it was not fraud, and if he believed he won the election he should be acquitted. Thanks, I think we're clear now.

I worked at a factory here for over 20 years, and the Thais seemed to live pretty nice lives. To westerners whose lives are focused on having crap, and not on family and whatnot it's hard to believe, I know.

Not anywhere I've been. How many of the guys from all over the world have to worry all year about the money to keep up their visas? Sure, there are people everywhere that never have to worry about money, but far and away, most people everywhere do.

Only if you redefine indiscriminate to mean any bombing, and redefine children to mean anyone under forty.

Oh no, like your carpet-bombing, he just redefined "men" to include rock. Now who looks stupid?

Nothing to see here....

You agreed you would pay them back on time and didn't. Liar. If I told you I promise I'll pick you up at the airport tomorrow at three, and never show, I wasn't lying, because it was a "future event". Trump promises to get Mexico to pay for the wall, but it was not a lie, because Mexico paying for the wall was a "future event". That's pretty weak even by your lame-a** standards.

Where is it that people live lives without money worries?

Education major?

Obviously, you are just in an arrogant and sickening state of denial and there is no point debating you. You are the type who the sun might be glaring in his face, but he would swear on the bible its pitch black. If 4000 dead kids so far do not move you, nothing else will and need to recheck your humanity.

No, per the example, you stole my car, and when I found you, I raped and killed your daughter, I killed your pregnant wife and baby, and then lit them on fire all while you watched, and then I killed you and burned your house down. So no, were not both criminals, you were a criminal, and I'm driving away laughing positing videos of you screaming online. You see them as being equivalent, I don't. Whatever.

"Obviously, you are just in an arrogant and sickening state of denial and there is no point debating you. You are the type who the sun might be glaring in his face, but he would swear on the bible its pitch black." Get used to it.

How would they know if the bombs they see exploding were dropped indiscriminately? The only people that could possibly know would be the people dropping the bombs. Is that not clear?