Jump to content

coolcarer

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,816
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

3,166 profile views

coolcarer's Achievements

Gold Member

Gold Member (8/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • 10 Posts
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • First Post
  • 5 Reactions Given

Recent Badges

2.4k

Reputation

  1. Where did I claim I know what their opinion is? I call it a review because that’s what they call it. EU foreign ministers are set to discuss the review during a gathering in Brussels on Monday. Member countries remain divided in their approach to Israel. While some ministers could advocate for moving toward taking action based on the review, no concrete decisions are expected at Monday’s session. https://www.timesofisrael.com/eu-report-finds-indications-that-israeli-actions-in-gaza-violate-cooperation-deal/
  2. Pure distraction from stopping Iran the state sponsors of world wide terrorism from getting a nuclear bomb.
  3. What on earth are you talking about? What was at the start of the enquiry? The member states that refused to take part did not magically change their minds. They still refuse. What enquiry are you referring to anyway? This was a review of the pact the EU has with Israel, not an enquiry. Any serious action taken, a big if then it takes a unanimous decision of member states which they just do not have. In addition keeping the 17 member states that wanted the review in lockstep will still be a problem. Any action will not be announced till the end of the summer, note if any action! The review outcome also needs to be presented to Israel first.
  4. Typical pro Palestine group. Now to be a terrorist group. Having viewed there website its no wonder. Let them go to Gaza and join Hamas.
  5. It’s a war and as your link says some have been repaired and they are fixing the other. Jeez. Hamas started this and can finish it today or months ago by releasing hostages and laying down arms.
  6. Not all of the EU member states then. Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy and Lithuania were against, and Latvia adopted a "neutral" position, sources said then. Israel decried the decision and called on Brussels to keep bilateral dialogue going. "We completely reject the direction taken in the statement, which reflects a total misunderstanding of the complex reality Israel is facing," a spokesperson of Israel's foreign ministry said in May. "This war was forced upon Israel by Hamas, and Hamas is the one responsible for its continuation."
  7. Yes of course you did. Here's another one for the mix, not that it makes much difference, these polls are a waste of time. Stopping Iran from getting weapons of mass destruction is the important thing. Be that through a deal (failed so far because of iran), relying on Israel or helping with some strikes with the bunker busters. I'm for helping! Hill Poll: Voters willing to see US attack Iran over nuclear weapons Nearly half of likely voters think the United States should be willing to use military force to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, according to this week’s The Hill Poll. Forty-nine percent said military force should be used, while 31 percent said it should not and 20 percent were not sure. https://thehill.com/polls/105058-hill-poll-voters-willing-to-see-us-attack-iran-over-nuclear-weapons/
  8. Nothing but happy faces collecting food aid at GHF and the international press reporting there too. This scene replays day after day at GHF’s distribution sites in Gaza. The happiness and appreciation runs deep. Delivering food in way that reaches the Palestinian people directly is essential. This is critical. We won’t be deterred. Today I visited one of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Secure Distribution Sites inside Gaza. A remarkable & unprecedented operation.
  9. Did Hamas bother to mention which org was supplying this aid when the alleged Israeli army fired? GHF sites have reported nothing again, they seem to be much safer than whoever is providing this aid. Thanks for the Hamas report though.
  10. They were out in London at the weekend, waving their Iranian flags. Confirming their support fora state sponsor of terrorism. Pathetic
  11. Will Greta be jumping on a boat to Iran next? Sandwiches in hand this time.
  12. Deflection from the Hamas claims and what Hamas is doing to try and stop aid being delivered. Here are health officials. In other words. Hamas
  13. Another extreme bias hit piece from the Guardian making unverified claims from Hamas and hearsay from unnamed so called health officials. Sick reporting after the reality of what Hamas have now resorted to in their murder of GHF staff helping to distribute aid. Pure Hamas propoganda
  14. Activism has been extremely lucrative for her then. How much she made from the selfie yacht would be interesting to know. Her social media post sponsorships are probably quite handsomely rewarded. A Hamas associated member organized the trip
×
×
  • Create New...