Chomper Higgot

If they have been keeping those bottles standing up all these years the contents are almost certainly Corked.

Any ruling by any ‘Sharia Court’ in the UK, just like any ruling by any other ‘Religious Court’ is subject to and may not infringe UK law OR just as importantly the European Convention on Human Rights. Which raises an interesting question. Why is it that those who are convinced that Sharia law is coming to get them and their rights are the same people, and newspapers, who vehemently oppose human rights laws and the ECHR, both of watch are a protection against tyrannical governments and abusive laws, regardless of those being religious or secular?

The anti Trump rhetoric is coming from Trump himself.

Says the guy who obviously has absolutely no idea what thread he’s posting in.

Superiors?

So off topic by seven decades,

Work place rule #1. Don’t dip your bread in your gravy.

In fairness (let me be polite), you are talking utter nonsense: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/06/22/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership/

And the absence of both you thought you’d give it a go.

I know it might be a bit of a revolutionary idea but I think they should abide by their own laws and the international conventions they have signed up to.

It’s not going to happen.

It was for generations a bit more than not speaking to Catholics in the work place. They were routinely excluded altogether.

Can you point out the bit where I ‘protect the terrorists’? Give it your best go.

There’s a thin veneer on that.

Because the UK is a signatory to the Convention. You too, and any member of your family in the UK would have the right appeal to the ECHR if you or their rights were being violated.