Chomper Higgot

They can make any promises they wish, they are never going to be in power and therefore will never have to deliver on these ‘easy promises’ The nations public services are already near collapse, tax cutting sounds great, until public services actually do collapse.

Truss was ousted by the Tories after bringing the economy to the brink of collapse. Tory reputation for ‘fiscal responsibility’ (which was always a joke) exposed as a lie.

Nothing at all like Labour.

Why would Labour worry about Reform, they are taking votes away from the Tories. I would be very surprised if Reform win more than a handful of seats, I doubt they’ll get more than a couple. They’re not even vetting their candidates and have ‘party structure’ to support an election campaign. What they are benefiting from is the media giving to them far more covers than the LibDems, Greens and Reform have hooked the Tories into playing catch-up. Reform make an outlandish rightwing policy promise, which they know they can never deliver on, the Tories respond with something similar, and Reform double down dragging the Tories further to the right. A mess of the Tories own making.

Take a look at Reform’s policies, they are focussed on reducing taxes and regulation. They are offering crumbs to the working class and riches for the already hyper wealthy, Classic populist scam.

And fear mongering is a great way to corral the minds of the gullible. Factor that.

An NDA is almost always a civil matter, very unlikely to be enforced under criminal law. There are also numerous reasons why an NDA may be voided.

The first misnomer is calling Reform UK a political party. It’s a lobby /pressure group, tactically pulling the Conservatives away from center right politics to the far right. Reform ‘members’ don’t get to vote on Reform Policies, they have zero say in how Reform or run.

He’s a carpet bagger playing to an audience. I doubt very much he believes the stuff he says.

Let’s see who backs out of the ‘debate’.

If they are bogus asylum seekers or simply dodging visa requirements they should not be in the UK. It’s the Government’s failure to deal with this that leaves these people in the UK

You might have a point, if not for the longstanding MAGA obsession with Hunter Biden.

Why does anyone still listen to Farage, the man’s a carnival barker. Wasn’t immigration supposed to be sorted out by the BREXIT con? He’s running his mouth, stirring xenophobia and blaming everyone else. Oddly, not standing for election and not joining a political party. Barking and hollering. It plays well to some.

Thanks for demonstrating the truth of my post.

I see the vitriol is flowing thick and fast in this thread. Intelligent, articulate, self confident woman sticks up for herself and runs circles around Convicted Felon Trump. The predictable response follows from the predictable sources.

It’s certainly a far better considered and thoughtful response than your ill informed nonsense deserves.

Like Biden has weaponized the DOJ to go after his own son?

Let’s have your evidence that Biden had any part in the prosecution of Convicted Felon Trump.

Trump did weaponize the DOJ. The unlawful imprisonment of Michael Cohen for having the temerity to execute his 1st Amendment right to write a book, albeit critical of Convicted Felon Trump.

I don’t know whether or not you were following any reliable reporting of his trial, but the only time Convicted Felon Trump woke up long enough to pay any attention to the proceedings was when Stormy Daniels was giving her testimony. Convicted Felon Trump certainly care about the ‘porn star’ telling her account of him ‘having’ her. You’re being rather presumptive on the matter of the SC, perhaps you think their might be some bias toward the Convicted Felon Trump. With the national flag flown upside down at their homes and the wives of SC Justices themselves involved in the Convicted Felon Trump’s insurrection, you might be correct. But then again do the SC want to even get involved?

Not in court they don’t.

Entirely consist with the definition of criminal conspiracy.

I believe the correct and more appropriate term is to ‘have Latin’ or ‘have some Latin’. As a child I learned classical Latin, and to this day still read Latin classics, most recently ‘The Agricola’ but I don’t read ecclesiastical or Medieval Latin. Latin as a subject has been widely taught in western schools and I expect far more people have at least some Latin than might be expected.

To be fair FOX News has been rather enjoyable this past few days.

Well if you will make the argument that a Republican in today’s GOP has any kind of moral authority on the basis of past history towards Convicted Felon Trump. Far too many spin on a dime.