Chomper Higgot

Perhaps the most twisted post I’ve ever read on this forum.

Drunk Yorkshireman trolls The Telegraph.

Everyone using social media is influenced by what is presented to them on the platforms they use.

RIP. Five children by an entirely unnecessary medical procedure, the demand for which is driven by the promotion for profit of cosmetic surgery. Undoubtedly an outcome that is left to the NHS to deal with. As so often, privatized profits, socialized costs.

Opinions differ. It’s a fair amount for something a lot more toxic and hurtful than ‘hurty words’.

‘Anti-Speechers’? Jones was lying for profit. Those his lies harmed have won a court settlement against him for the harm he caused them. Lies have consequences, Jones is now in the receiving end of the consequences of his lies. It’s rather fitting he should be.

To be fair, I don’t think Trump has ever read that particular book. Or for that matter, any book.

Nobody removed Jones’ free speech. He used it very effectively to lie for profit causing real harm to those he targeted. Now he’s getting some justice.

Quite the contrary, there were plenty of options other than sitting at home. My favorite sport enjoyed a boom, the healthy choice of exercise and fresh air was too good for many to miss. https://www.bbc.com/future/bespoke/made-on-earth/the-great-bicycle-boom-of-2020.html

Yes you are. You’re almost in cut a paste territory.

“Grossly offensive” Jonny, in breach of the law. I’ve linked the actual clause of the actual law, you should appraise yourself if it. “Strawman” as in portraying grossly offensive posts in breach of the law as “A fancy way of saying he was jailed for being rude.” No Jonny, he was being grossly offensive in breach of the law.

Now you’re trolling. Not a shred of evidence from you that he did not commit the crime he admitted and was convicted for.

Odd thing to say given you have been presented with the actual offense your martyr committed, as reported by the Crown Prosecution Service and you have also been presented with the actual law and clause of the law that he breached. My apologies that reality isn’t aligned with your misrepresentation of the facts of the case for which a formal CPS report has been provided.

Less than three months into a new Government is obviously too soon to determine if they are going to live up to manifesto promises. The Government hasn’t yet delivered its first budget.

He wasn’t being ‘offensive’ he was being ‘grossly offensive’ to an extent that breached 127(1)(a) and (3) of the Communications Act 2003. Lots of people criticize Government policy, but they don’t engage in racially aggravated breaches of the law. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gdww5lx2vo.amp Off you go again on your Muslim thing. Off you go again on your Edwards thing. Off you go again on your two tier Starmer thing. Are you aware that Starmer does not control police investigations, court verdicts, and court sentencing? Or is it something else you are willfully ignorant of?!

No convicted for breach of 127(1)(a) and (3) of the Communications Act 2003, that’s ‘ criminal behavior’. Short form ‘for breaking the law’. You might find the actual law instructive: “127Improper use of public electronic communications network (1)A person is guilty of an offence if he— (a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; “ “3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both.” He admitted his guilt, said he got caught up following the mob. (never wise that following the mob thing). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/127 I see your claims of ‘criticizing Government policy’ have evaporated.

He was convicted for: “Lee Dunn, date of birth 10/07/1973, is from Egremont, Cumbria and pleaded guilty to a charge of sending a grossly offensive message, contrary to section 127(1)(a) and (3) of the Communications Act 2003.” As is often the case his online posting has caught up with his day job, his criminal conviction has almost certainly cost him the security clearance he must have for lucrative work at Sellafield. “Janet Potter, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS North West, said: “This conviction should be a stark reminder to so-called keyboard warriors: online actions have consequences.” https://www.cps.gov.uk/north-west/news/man-jailed-offensive-social-media-posts-wake-recent-disorder

Name him Jonny and I’ll post the details of the crimes for which he was actually convicted and imprisoned.

Just like the American Diaspora registering to vote and put an end to the ambitions of a convicted criminal to be back in the WH.

Once again you spew you the misinformation you have repeatedly been corrected on with actual court reports. Nobody has been imprisoned for criticizing the Government’s policies. Give us names Jonny and I’ll put you right … again.

This is the message the NYP are trying to get across: Stoking fear in N.Carolina of something that hasn’t actually happened. N. Carolina being a critical state to win the WH.

Link

Let’s have a look at the youth vote: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4895567-harris-31-point-lead-trump-youth-poll/

You missed your vocation, but sadly for you the golden era of the Nickel Weeklies has passed. Try the NYP, perhaps they’ll buy your fictional musings, you have talent for this stuff, don’t waste it.

There is no proof of something that doesn’t exist. It’s for Trump and his supporters, both foreign and domestic, to demonstrate the truth of Trump’s pejorative claims.