Chomper Higgot

Euphemisms you say.

It’s not the end of society I associate with and certainly not one I defend. But I will accept making a spelling error, something that pales into insignificance compared to excusing and obfuscating the crimes of a convicted nonce. Refer to my post immediately above for the age range of children on the pornography for which Edwards was convicted.

A middle aged man imprisoned for crimes involving child pornography, specifically: “Huw Edwards was found to have: 41 IIOC comprise 7 Category A images (6x moving and 1x still), 12 Category B images (all moving) and 22 Category C images (1x moving and 21x still). The estimated ages for the children present in the Category A images is generally around 13 to 15 with two of the moving images showing a child aged around 7 to 9. The estimated ages for the children present in the Category B images is generally around 12 to 14, and for the Category C images generally around 12 to 15.” https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/ex-broadcaster-sentenced-possessing-indecent-images-children

You mean the women who want the right of dominion over their own bodies returned to them?!

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/obfuscate Introducing arguments that obfuscate the main issue (most[?] 14 to 16 years are sexually active) into a discussion's on the conviction of middle aged nonce. Which is precisely why I asked you what your alleged sexual activity of 14 to 16 year olds has to do with the conviction of the middle aged nonce Edwards.

The defense of fiction and hyperbole is not more fiction and more hyperbole.

The causal link between consumption of child pornography and child sexual abuse has already been established and is recognized in the law.

And there’s your excusing and obfuscation. Edwards isn’t a 14 year old, he’s a middle aged adult. “Unsavory”, no, not unsavory illegal.

That doesn’t answer my question. You stated most 14 to 16 year olds are sexually active. My question again. What has that got to do with the crimes for which the nonse Edwards was convicted?

My bad. Now all you have to do is explain what allegations of most 14 to 16 year olds being sexually actively has to do with the crimes fit which the nonse Edwards was convicted.

Ah personal attack and slurring innuendo. Now all you have to do is explain what the alleged sexual activity of teenagers in Thailand has to do with the crimes for which the nonse Edwards was convicted in a UK court.

Your posts are the demonstration. There’s a law, Edwards broke the law.

So absolutely nothing to do with this proposed legislation then.

No case to answer. Case closed.

Like I said excusing and obfuscating.

Thank you, and the NYP, for doing your bit to get every Democratic voter, and all those ‘never Trump’ Republicans to the polls.

I think you just did. What I am not is an excuser or obfuscater for the crimes of a convicted nonse.

I, in agreement with his Jury, put all of Edwards’ criminal behavior on his shoulders. I am disappointed the judge chose to be lenient in his sentencing decision, the basis of my thoughts on his sentence are explained in my post you responded to. Child pornography and the crimes behind it are not trivial matters, explaining, in reasoned detail my thoughts on Edwards’ crime and light sentence is far from drama.

I unequivocally support the right of Edwards, or indeed anyone no matter what their crime, to be afforded a qualified, competent and unbiased legal support during their investigation, arrest and trial. Why anyone would defend Edwards after his conviction is a mystery. If you can’t find a more deserving hill to die on, at least try to find one that isn’t at this end of the scale of perversion. I personally would like to see his sentence reviewed and raised to some serious time in prison.

Disproportionately Trump supporters, which in itself begs a number of questions all starting with ‘wtf’.

“I mad a post about NY” “Bots may not be fluent in English.” It’s not entirely unlikely.

Actually no, not mentioned at all. You made it up yourself.

Hate?

Moving from whataboutary to pure fiction isn’t an improvement.

OK so your 40% was indeed nonsense. You’ve got form.