Chomper Higgot

DeSantis will have to wait, the FBI have jurisdiction.

Your imagination is wasted Jonny, you could write novels; fictional fantasy stuff seems to be your natural genre.

“Russia, if you are listening” Said a man who hopes American voters are not.

I see The Daily Telegraph are still in that place of hurt they’ve been in silence July 5.

It’s not hard to find: Here from the Daily Mail report on the original criminal trial: In March, 2004, after false documents had been obtained claiming the girl was their daughter, a successful request was made to the British High Commission in Ghana for UK entry clearance for the "family". Three months later they flew to London. Here from the records of the disciplinary hearing: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-566852/Couple-smuggled-13-year-old-girl-Britain-work-household-slave.html https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66e2e938718edd8177131679/TRATMPO_Ernestina_Quainoo_conduct_panel_outcome__002_.pdf

Another one of your non sequiturs Jonny Once again I’ll ask you to produce evidence to your claim that I have blamed the rightwing, or indeed rightwing hate mongering for: “Immigrant trafficks and enslaves a child, gets convicted and then lies about the conviction to get a job working with children” Give it your best go.

I think Trump is hoping for a rebound once his ‘I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT’ scream gains traction.

RIP Amber. Didn’t one of the candidates for the Presidency discuss this very specific risk and consequences of pregnant women being denied healthcare as a direct result of the other candidate’s ’victory’ over Rowe v Wade?!

Then you should have no problem at all producing a post by me in which I ‘shill for Huw’. Give it your best go.

Does the Huw Edwards case get a mention in the Saville Report is that you doing a bit of time travel?

Ah, back to your dog whistling.

Shilling for Huw, the pervert I say should be in prison? Do you think you could comply with the forum rules and produce some credible evidence to back it up?

That’s a very serious allegation. Do you think you could comply with the forum rules and produce some credible evidence to back it up?

Perhaps one of those clauses in contracts that people imagine.

Support what Jonny?

No it does. You have stated the BBC were reluctant to let him go. This deserves some evidence to back it up.

I agree his behavior is abhorrent. There may or may not have been these clauses you refer to in his contract, we neither of us know. We do know that dismissing people on the basis of unproven allegations ones with legal risks. The court is the arbiter of guilt, not the BBC.

We now know Edwards is not ‘of the highest character’. I expect the BBC took legal counsel on the matter. Had the BBC dismissed him before the verdict and he had been found innocent, I expect the same perpetual BBC critics would be complaining about the cost of the ensuing legal settlement.

Pensions are held in trust, they are not under the control of the beneficiary and hence not subject to confiscation.

Not normalizing anything Jonny. Perhaps you should consider whether or not the rightwing hate mongering against immigrants plays any part in preventing victims of trafficking seeking help from the police and other authorities.

Particularly if the allegation has been made but a conviction not yet handed down.

It’s not unusual not to sack someone when they are charged with crimes but not yet convicted.

More supposition with zero backing.

Reluctantly suspended, reluctantly let go?

I know that Mokwit. But right wingers claiming the BBC is left wing does not make it so. The Rightwing fixation on the BBC being left wing is not an opinion shared by the majority of the British Public: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/trackers/is-the-bbc-more-favourable-towards-labour-the-left-or-the-conservatives-the-right