Chomper Higgot

You’re on a roll, that’s two posts in a row I agree with.

You’ve described your view of the woman who has mauled the self proclaimed savior of America, the man who says he will Make America Great Again. It’s not a good look is it?!

OK, enlighten me. Why does a Billionaire need to beg money off his supporters, many of whom are living on low incomes?

I doubt he’ll pay his lawyers, but he will pay what the courts order him to pay. Assuming of course he’s not bankrupted by the award against him.

Republican makes allegations, but where is his evidence to back them up?

I don’t spend much time worrying about my past catching up with me.

Let’s be more precise, it’s not the President’s job to prosecute anyone.

Apart from stoking your grievance, why does it matter?

I take it that’s you not renewing your visa next year then.

But the person who started the war is the guy Republicans refuse to criticize.

1 Corinthians 13:11 I recommend the KJV

Trump ‘giving aid and comfort to those who have engaged in insurrection’. It’s a behavior that gets a mention in The Constitution.

I don’t know if it’s completely random, but you’ve at last posted something I agree with.

And the war monger making war in Europe right now with his illegal invasion of Ukraine.

So close the legal means to make a living, what means of supporting themselves do you suppose these people would turn to? Do you think making people outlaws might leave them prey to criminals? Maybe not even criminals, employ an ‘outlawed immigrant’ to do your yard work then refuse to pay them, they can’t go to the cops can they? Let’s see if you can think stuff through?!

Don’t get me wrong, grifters extorting money from their marks is often legal, or in the dark grey shadows of legality. It’s not the legality I’m referring to but Trump’s habit of grifting, his marks’ willingness to be conned and the obvious question ’why does a billionaire need to beg money off anyone?’

Just one example, among many, of the judge being extremely and overtly fair to Trump.

The proxy war that Putin started, how accommodating of him to help Biden out like that. Or is it that your departure from reality is getting beyond the realms of even the most fetid imaginings?

In the subject of ‘money grubbing’ has Trump started using this ruling against him to fleece his supporters yet?

Clutch those straws if they bring you comfort. Remember, past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Which in a civil trial is a smart strategy. The case is settled on which party the Jury believes to be the most credible. Trump’s refusal to provide a sample is an example of raising doubts about the credibility of his defense. Unlike a criminal case, in a civil case the jury cans draw inference from either party refusing to cooperate or provide disclosure, in common parlance ‘if he were innocent he would have cooperated’. Smart work by Carroll and her legal team, characteristically dumb work by Trump and his lawyers.

Always assuming Trump has $83.3 Million to hand. If he does now, he might very well not have after NY has done with him.

Forgive me if I hit a nerve, it was entirely un intended.

I’m saving adding the good stuff for the ruling from Trump’s NY Fraud Trial. Given the brouhaha kicked up by his fluffers over $83.3million, the $hundred of millions in the NY case should have a few heads exploding.

Not everyone loved him before he went into politics. He was widely despised, especially in NY City.