Chomper Higgot

So you go looking for opinions you agree with then post the links here.

Needs saving so soon. Who would have guessed.

Per the link, defendant Trump meets non of the conditions under which his presence in court during the trial is optional. Refer also to the Parker Warning: https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/8-Colloquies/Admonition-Parker.docx

Wrong again: And the judge also cautioned the defendant that if he fails to attend court an arrest will be made. (Parker Warning). https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_43

Off thing to say given the stagnated economy, prices still above the target 2% and the current Government having enacted the highest tax take since WW2. https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/article-12781839/amp/Tax-burden-highest-Second-World-War-44-billion-stealth-tax.html

So let me get this right. The radical left/deep state: 1. Forced Trump to commit crimes. 2. Infiltrated the Trump DOJ (which successfully prosecuted the crimes in which Trump was named the co-conspirator and for which Trump is now indicted) 3. Infiltrated the GOP, the Trump Business Organization and Trump’s trusted inner circle - laying low for decades waiting for the chance to give testimony and produce evidence against Trump. 4. Infiltrated and took control of the DOJ 5. Infiltrated and took control of the Grand Jury 6. Infiltrated and took control of the judiciary, in mind the appellate court. 7. Infiltrated Trump’s defense team and sabotaged their legal arguments and court filings. etc Or. There really is something worthy of criminal indictment about Trump’s behavior. …. Give up my nationality guessing, I’m not the subject of discussion.

That might address the logic of using a bond. It doesn’t address the legitimate question of examining the funds that are claimed to be guaranteeing the bond.

If the bond is secured by ‘Trump’s cash’, and presumably at some significant rates of interest/service charges. Why on earth is the bond necessary? Somebody needs to take a close look at that cash. The bond issuer’s statement alone is justification to do so. Voters might also want to assure themselves that the Presumptive Republican Candidate isn’t in debt to anyone hoping to buy some influence. Eyes all over that ‘Trump Cash Deposit’ seems more than necessary.

OK so your accusation of canceling Truss was baseless. Glad we cleared that up.

If you believed any of that you wouldn’t be engaging in streams of personal attacks.

That’s not even a single fact, let alone a brace of facts.

You’ve adopted the logic of a Monty Python sketch …. I broke a coffee cup this afternoon. Biden is President, ergo the broken coffee cup is Biden’s fault.

What? Point out where I even suggested ‘cancelling’ Truss. Go on, give it your best go.

I have absolutely no doubt Trump wishes to weaponize the DOJ, he did so when he was President. But he’s not going to be President. For the next 6-8 weeks he’s going to be on show to the press, they’ve already noticed his inability to stay awake. His aphasia is also already getting noticed. There’s no hiding the mess he is.

Then please do. All you’ve offered so far is canned MAGA talking points.

How about this as an alternative. Break the law and face the consequences.

Or do you would have us believe. But it’s just something you made up.

More conspiracy nonsense.

All these claims of ‘weaponizing the DOJ’. Firstly, ask Michael Cohen about that. Secondly, are we pretending that anyone other than Trump under multiple felony indictments who engaged in attacks on the jury, court officials, witnesses and family members of the Judge presiding over one of his trials would not have had their bail revoked? He should have been locked up awaiting trial months back.

And you have the evidence?!

Nobody is trying to jail a President. Defendant Trump is not the President, he’s a private citizen indicted by Grand Jury and now facing trial before a Jury of his peers.

How is putting a claim to immunity before the court the same as claiming to be above the law? Is that how far you’ve gone in your denial of reality, or is there more?

I guess this gets a pass our friends on the rightwing.

Says guy ranting about TDS because he doesn’t like what others are saying about the topic under discussion.

Let’s see how the bond holds up.