Chomper Higgot

The statement of facts also refers to Weisselberg and David Pecker. Also keep in mind Cohen presented call recordings relating to the pay off, these are a matter of court record.

Desperation, go after the wives and daughters.

You allege the NYDA has committed fraud, but present no evidence. Trump’s lawyers have stated they will file a motion to dismiss, if you have evidence to back your assertion send it ASAP, they need all the help they can get.

34 felony indictments and you want more. Don’t worry, Georgia DA and the DOJ are on it.

Count me as a believer. But then I was never one of those that believed Trump (AKA The Defendant) would ever be indicted.

You would perhaps prefer someone wearing a red hat and a sleeveless shirt.

‘Mistake’?

Let me correct you, the only factual evidence you’ve seen.

I believe that’s the claim:

Falsifying business records in the first degree is in and of itself a felony.

So why all the angst?

Don’t worry, the Prosecution have the records of the alleged transactions.

Trump supporters will not accept any indictments, trial or conviction of their idol. The Defendant himself has in the past said as much ‘I could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose voters’. There is no negotiating with idolatry, no sense at all in considering the views of cult followers when choosing what laws to enforce.

But he’s now a Defendant, anything and everything he says relating to the case may be used against him at trial. He needs to stay schtum. Well, if he knows what’s good for him.

Is falsifying business records in the first degree a crime? This case breaks what is only a convention of not indicting a former President. Bringing more indictments against the Defendant just got a whole lot easier, a whole lot more certain.

“Falsifying business records in the first degree” doesn’t sound very dramatic, it is however a felony and of concern to the Defendant, it is a felony that is very easily proven with documents and records. Or in this case 34 counts of “Falsifying business records in the first degree”

The immediacy is there right in front of you, I’ll grant you the Defendant hasn’t kicked off with his usual whinny histrionics, even he seems to have grasped the gravity of the situation he’s put himself in. I’m hopeful your wish with respect to other investigations the Defendant faces will meet your wishes and tgen some.

While the Defendant was being arrested in New York, the DOJ won at appeal to compel the testimony of Mark Meadows. The Defendant is heading into a world of hurt.

As these cases against Trump build and threaten his liberty he has one final defense. That defense resides within the accusations of senility and mental incapacity that he has frequently directed at President Biden. His accusation will, to the surprise of few, turn out to be a confession.

You do realize that the Facebook Algorithms select what news items they feed you based on your previous reactions. Or to put it more simply, they are feeding you what they know you want to see, your world view is being manipulated by the algorithm.

The truth to dealt with later today is that surrounding Donald Trump’s behavior. That’s how the Justice stream works, one case at a time on its own merits. I realize the unfolding events are difficult for you, try not to get distracted by other issues, real or imagined. Pay attention to what the indictments actually are. You have the opportunity of getting a very clear view. Good luck with what you learn from it.

The article makes no distinction on what constitutes ’harsh discipline’. While they almost certainly come as a pair, physical violence and emotional violence are not the same thing nor do they have the same impact. I doubt anyone can recall the pain of being hit as a child, whether by a parent, sibling, teacher, whoever. But emotionally abusive scaldings leave a scar that lasts. It’s not uncommon for adults to still wince at the recollection of cruel words directed at them when they were children. To my mind hitting a child and emotionally abusing a child with scaldings are two different things with very different impacts. The latter, I feel, is far more damaging, yet it is the former that gets the attention.

Excellent and I agree entirely, especially your last sentence. Like many kids I had my fair share of opportunities to get in trouble, the existence of clear and consistent rules at home helped me navigate those risks safely. Neither I nor my brothers or sisters where ever hit by our parents, but we all absolutely knew what rule was and where the line was drawn.

I’ll think you’ll find the news you clearly aren’t happy hearing is being carried internationally.

On the subject of BS. You’ve not seen the indictments, so your comment is clearly a perfect example of what you claim tge indictments to be. Once again a rightwing accusation turns out to be a confession.