Chomper Higgot

I’m not sure anyone had said ‘she’s the best candidate’, my view is she’s a great choice. I’ve already debunked the fallacy of ‘a best candidate’, it’s a nonsense.

Why does it matter? A choice has been made, so what’s your objection, or is this another of your ‘I don’t know much about it/I’ve not been following this/I’m not informed on the issue… that’s why I’m asking’ sprees?

There is no ‘Best qualified person for the job’. There are numerous people who are qualified, each offering their own range of qualifications and experience. Justice Brown Jackson is demonstrably highly qualified and a great pick.

It’s not her gender that has triggered all this rightwing outrage, refer racist meme posted and liked above.

Not for the first time you insert your fixation with other people’s gender into your posts.

How is this even relevant in this discussion?

I think he got it right, Justice Brown Jackson is a great pick.

Again, it was a campaign strategy that worked, delivering both an election victory and a superbly qualified SC Justice.

Earlier you made the accusation of selection on the basis of ‘affirmative action’. Now you object to the predominance of candidates being selected who attended the two top law schools in the US. Entry to these law schools is extremely competitive, not so many other law schools. Perhaps you would like to see ‘affirmative action’ in favor of less academically gifted applicants.

The ones that select the brightest applicants: https://www.velocitylsat.com/resources/top-law-schools I note you’ve flipped on candidates being selected on ability.

Too many people from the US top law schools?

He wasn’t ’virtue signaling’ he was ‘campaigning’. It worked, he won the election and appointed a highly qualified Justice who has spent her career representing ordinary people, she’s not some ‘corporate puppet’. A great pick.

Stick with ‘Justice Brown Jackson’, we’ll all know who you are referring to.

The Sun is written for a reading age of eight year olds, even then it seems some can’t get past the headlines.

Excellent.

Hogwash. Ketanji Brown Jackson is eminently qualified: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketanji_Brown_Jackson Your accusation of ‘affirmative action’ says absolutely nothing about Brown Jackson but a great deal about you.

Time to roll back the religious clique.

A bit of hyperbole, nobody is trying to shut down all power stations. Followed by climate change denial tropes. But yes, sadly, tackling climate change is left to Liberals and progressives, the rightwing having abandoned science and the environment.

There’s absolutely nothing ‘woke’ on this news piece. But don’t let that stop you.

A welcome return to appointing Justices who are qualified for the post.

The SCOTUS is begging to be reformed.

You’ll find the answer to that in Florida: https://apnews.com/article/epstein-maxwell-timeline-b9f15710fabb72e8581c71e94acf513e

Stick to her testimony given under oath.

There is no humor to be found in adults sexually abusing minors. Well not for anyone with even a shred of human decency there’s not.

Well that and JohnnyF wedging sexuality into the thread: The outrage and anger is constantly bubbling under the surface.