Chomper Higgot

All fine and dandy, until it gets to the bit where they need to present evidence to a Grand Jury. Stick with the Comey Clown Show, it is at least entertaining .

The allegations against Trump are called criminal indictments passed down by a Grand Jury, they are now the subject of criminal prosecution. The ‘allegations’ against Biden are completely unsubstantiated. There’s a difference.

So long as I don’t have to hold my breath.

Allegations without evidence.

None of this is smoke, it’s all hot air from Comer. Accusations of crimes need evidence, he has no evidence of crimes that’s why he uses the terms ‘may have’, ‘possible’ and other such mealy-mouthed nonsense.

And you can provide examples?

FOX News, that organization that admitted in court to lying and even then went on to lie before the court. Is that where you go for your ‘Facts’?

“The only strong evidence Joe wasn't involved was” You what??? It doesn’t work like that. If you are going to accuse someone of a crime you need evidence they committed a crime, they don’t need to provide evidence they did not.

Try this for size. Banks notify international interbank transactions above $10,000, I make a number of such transactions per year. Each is notified as a ‘potential criminal transaction’ on the basis of the legal requirement to report, not on the basis of the transaction being a crime - The banks do not themselves investigate. “Financial institutions and money transfer providers are obligated to report international transfers that exceed $10,000.” https://www.bossrevolution.com/en-us/blog/international-money-transfer-laws So calm down, Comer and Murdoch’s NY Post mischaracterizing normal bank reporting might be the kind of nonsense you are eager to swallow but it is not evidence of any crimes.

The only surprise here is a Republican Governor acting to cut out the rot in his own Party. Hat’s off to Gov. Kevin Stitt for acting on this.

It’s that Republican accusation/confession thing again.

If a predatory pervert gets accused of other crimes, I’m not inclined to be the least bit concerned.

That’s a very thin line of defense, more the point not a behaviour many feel the need to defend.

OK, that’s the mistakes. Now let’s deal with the Criminal actions.

The topic is “Climate-sceptic accounts surge after Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover”

There was me thinking it was that special kind of attention some men reserve for intelligent, articulate women who have the temerity to express their opinion.

How did Greta get into this? Oh, you obsessed again.

Well you believe the UN want to control what we say and what we think. So you are right, people will believe all sorts of nonsense.

Nurses are going on strike, Doctors too. Enough, has become enough. Not everyone has a ‘partner’.

Sickening.

Seek and you shall find: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/space-exploration-technologies/company_financials Interestingly a significant cross over with who funds Twitter. Don’t worry people, Musk has your back.

There is also a problem with the classification of ‘mass shootings’. Few people are concerned if a drug gang member shoots dead half a dozen other drug gang members. What is of concern is killers arming themselves and going on murder sprees in schools, colleges, shopping malls, churches, synagogues and other places where law abiding citizens have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Let’s not mix the data.

“Accuracy and power mean little at close range” Tell that to the Uvalde police officers cowering outside while kids were being murdered at close range. Utter nonsense.

Defeatist logic. Doing nothing will certainly give rise to more deaths. Removing an particularly lethal and favored weapon of mass killers will as you say cause them to choose other weapons, less accurate, less powerful and less lethal.

Pledging support to the NRA and ignoring the fact 60% of American adults neither own a gun or live in a gun owning household. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/13/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/