Chomper Higgot

It’s that Republican accusation/confession thing again.

If a predatory pervert gets accused of other crimes, I’m not inclined to be the least bit concerned.

That’s a very thin line of defense, more the point not a behaviour many feel the need to defend.

OK, that’s the mistakes. Now let’s deal with the Criminal actions.

The topic is “Climate-sceptic accounts surge after Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover”

There was me thinking it was that special kind of attention some men reserve for intelligent, articulate women who have the temerity to express their opinion.

How did Greta get into this? Oh, you obsessed again.

Well you believe the UN want to control what we say and what we think. So you are right, people will believe all sorts of nonsense.

Nurses are going on strike, Doctors too. Enough, has become enough. Not everyone has a ‘partner’.

Sickening.

Seek and you shall find: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/space-exploration-technologies/company_financials Interestingly a significant cross over with who funds Twitter. Don’t worry people, Musk has your back.

There is also a problem with the classification of ‘mass shootings’. Few people are concerned if a drug gang member shoots dead half a dozen other drug gang members. What is of concern is killers arming themselves and going on murder sprees in schools, colleges, shopping malls, churches, synagogues and other places where law abiding citizens have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Let’s not mix the data.

“Accuracy and power mean little at close range” Tell that to the Uvalde police officers cowering outside while kids were being murdered at close range. Utter nonsense.

Defeatist logic. Doing nothing will certainly give rise to more deaths. Removing an particularly lethal and favored weapon of mass killers will as you say cause them to choose other weapons, less accurate, less powerful and less lethal.

Pledging support to the NRA and ignoring the fact 60% of American adults neither own a gun or live in a gun owning household. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/13/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/

So let’s pretend that the false statements made by FOX to the court weren’t first the subject of detailed legal strategy discussions undertaken by FOX and their legal team.

Perhaps you should have a think about what it is the SCOTUS does.

‘Mental Health’ now that’s something to think about.

Actually it was an Amendment to the Constitution, and not the first nor the last. The Constitution can be Amended.

Lying to the Court. That’s going to cost.

Perhaps they already have a life and don’t want to follow the example you yourself are setting and have outline above.

Perhaps they don’t want France to go the same way.

As the article you linked clearly states, the Judge(s) did not wave any ‘Executive Privilege’, they ruled there was no ‘Executive Privilege’ since the actions by Trump being investigated are crimes out with the Presidential Duties. USA v Nixon already established at the SCOTUS there is no Executive Privilege’ covering actions by the sore side t that are crimes. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Nixon

NYAG is on it. https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2022/statement-attorney-general-james-court-tossing-latest-nra-effort-avoid

Name a repressive regime or religion that doesn’t pay particular attention to controlling women.