Chomper Higgot

It’s been explained to you many times, she 17 and trafficked across a state line for the purposes of paid sex. 1. Trafficked across a state line. 2. not legally competent to consent to paid sex. You cannot conclude that because an individual is not charged that they did not commit a crime. Nor can you conclude anything from something not being reported in the media.

It his defenders here are all men.

Once again, she’s a smart cookie. Prince Andrew demanded take this before a jury, that didn’t happen either. Prince Andrew is not a smart cookies. He’s done.

He’s done and you know he is.

Which does not stop some here engaging in attacks upon her. Figure that.

She set off to get $5million and wound up getting over £12million + a formal apology. Well done!

Here’s a better summary. Prince Andrew settled out of court for £millions and a formal apology to Giuffre. Just the bare facts will do nicely.

Again, replete with your own assumptions.

An assumption on your part.

Who got the £millions and who had to apologize to whom?

We’ll all that’s left for Prince Andrew’s defenders is to attack the woman he has been forced to apologize to and to whom he must now hand over £millions. One has to ask, Prince Andrew clearly decided doing so was in his very best interest, so why the incandescent rage from his male supporters? Read their comments and decide for yourself.

Public opinion is already demanding Prince Andrew be stripped of titles and duties, it’s also playing into growing Republicanism. Your man paid up, he’s lost in the court of public opinion, he’s done.

The fallacy of your continual references to the non applicable English law has been explained to you more than once. Your man paid up, he’s done.

I call her a victim because she was a victim of sex trafficking when she was a minor.

He’s short by at least £12million.

Public opinion has everything to do with it.

UK is now offering COVID vaccination for 5-11 year olds: https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o411

Don’t get fooled into tempting probability. Darwin wrote a book on it.

The matter is to be raised in the House of Commons: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/feb/16/duke-of-yorks-sexual-abuse-case-settlement-to-be-raised-in-parliament

Which is why he’s handing over £millions

And there cannot be an examination of the case until the court has determined if it has jurisdiction.

Whataboutary

I never stated criminal charges were brought. She was trafficked to Andrew at the age of 17, which under YS law is a crime and is below the age at which she was legally competent to consent. Stay classy Andrew.

Giuffre was not legally competent to make any such decision. This has been explained to you many times.

I’ve never made such an accusation.