Chomper Higgot

And that’s all that is needed for ‘Reasonable Doubt’.

I’m not making wild assertions, you are. I’m referring to that centuries old judicial maxim (brace yourself)…. ‘Reasonable Doubt’.

Hunter Biden certainly can’t. He doesn’t even know who has has access to this computer since he allegedly last saw it. What is indisputable is, lots of people had access to this computer before it was taken under the custody of the FBI.

If + Could And you are right, you don’t have complete knowledge of what is on Hunter Biden’s computer. Hunter Biden himself cannot swear under oath that he has complete knowledge of what is on this computer given it has been out of his possession for so long and I’m the hands of multiple people before being placed into the custody of the FBI.

Good luck with that.

That might be the case if the documents were not recovered from ‘Boxes’ ’ in ‘Trump’s Mar a Largo’ estate and if the FBI had no evidence of Trump instructing that those documents be retained, moved or hidden. And even if you managed to clutch all those straws there’s another problem. Trump has admitted to having the documents. It gets better. Trump asked for the documents to be returned to him.

If + If + If + If

There’s a marked difference between DNA evidence that is categorically link d to the identity of individuals and computer data files which may be added by anyone holding possession of the computer.

I suggest you go read up on Chain of Custody and what particular problems it is intended to address. I have.

That is no excuse for Government by executive edict to continue.

You haven’t addressed the point I have made. The Bill transfers the powers of Parliament to the Executive. This is a departure from the laws of the nation being deterred by Parliament to the laws of the nation being deterred by Executive edict. Are you supportive of this? Or should Parliament be Sovereign?

The repeal of laws has a centuries long history, it follows the democratic process in which Parliament is endowed with the power to make laws and, where necessary, repeal laws. The process is subject to Parliamentary review, debate and approval. The Retained EU Law Bill aims to hand these powers to Ministers (remove these power from Parliament), replacing the democratic processes of Parliament with executive edict. Perhaps you are content to see the Sovereignty of Parliament and the Democratic process usurped.

I’ve never argued that the UK should continue doing more or less the same as it’s been doing for past 15 years, and absolutely not for the course it’s been following for the past 12 years.

Why would the UK veto laws and regulations that the UK had an active role in drafting?

What Sunak is doing is kicking the can down the road. The ERG want full deregulation of the UK, which like the Lettuce’s ripping up ‘economic orthodoxy’ will result in extreme damage to the UK economy. It certainly will not deliver benefits for ordinary citizens. A battle is due, between the madness of the ERG and Conservative prudence.

It very much matters who’s in charge. This Government took the opportunity of the COVID excuse to introduce ‘fast track’ (VIP) procurement. It resulted in £Billions being handed to chums of Government Ministers who raked in vast personal profits while delivering very little benefit to the nation; though of course in an energy crisis useless PPE might be burned in chain grate boilers to produce electricity.

Meaningless comment

The laws were not ‘imposed on the UK’ the UK was actively involved in their drafting, had an absolute right to veto and passed the laws in the UK Parliament.

Good move and not before time.

You could counter it with some tangible BREXIT benefits.

One can imagine lots of things.

There zero EU laws on the UK statute books. Laws on the UK statute books are by definition UK laws, they were put there by the UK parliament. They cover a number of important issues, including workers rights, rights to equality in au and retirement benefits, through product safety to the protection of individual privacy. All the stuff the extremists in the ERG would rather was not in the way of their plans to make more money for themselves and their chums.

Because I read the article. Refer above and follow the link.

It’s totally unrelated to illegal immigration to the UK (inserted by you), but how you can claim it is not related BREXIT which removed from all British citizens the right to live and work in EU nations is a mystery.

The Guardian frequently reports on illegal immigration, they don’t however conflate their reports on the matter with a report on Britons being expelled from EU nations. The Guardian didn’t get to vote on Brexit, neither did Britons living in EU nations, despite being the British citizens most effected by the outcome.