Chomper Higgot

If I knew why Prince Andrew’s mum stripped him of his military and Royal titles, I wouldn’t have asked the question in the first place.

Prince Andrew had his chance to clear his name, he decided he’d rather pay out millions in order to forgo that chance. He paid out millions and left the question of his guilt unanswered. He’s in a position suspicion that is of his own choosing, and aid for it even.

I wonder why his mum stripped him of all those military titles and Royal appointments?

So why did he pay out millions. I’m not the subject of this thread, neither is your imaginations on what my nationality might be. Stick to topic please.

It was a civil law suit, the outcome of which is always a two part decision. Is the allegation substantiated? If substantiated how much compensation must be paid? Prince Andrew first demanded a trial by jury and then decided, of his own volition, to pay up. So innocent he thought paying out millions was the best option.

Perhaps they do. Use of a phone is not a definition of what constitutes being trafficked.

Don’t want to address the fact my statement was correct then.

“Andrew was staring down the barrel of discovery, and the decision to settle will ultimately save him from that process. As part of discovery, both Giuffre and Andrew were set to give video depositions under oath” https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/prince-andrew-virginia-giuffre-settlement-jeffrey-epstein-1300515/

Sounds more like some rich guy with connections buying his way out of having to face ‘Discovery’ and provide a ‘Deposition under oath’. Which is what it was.

I never understood why Trump and his supporters wanted the Durham Inquiry in the first place. When did they ever have a need of facts, evidence or sworn testimony? They just make stuff up, the more crack-pot, bizarre and divorced from reality the more they believe it.

Biden isn’t going anywhere.

I’ll start to worry when I hear the President is taken by his staff for an unplanned visit to hospital in the middle of the night so he can be administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test. If he then starts boasting that the test was difficult, but he aced it anyway, I’ll really start to worry.

I’m not sure it was a good idea, in terms of your point of view, for you to introduce IQ into the discussion, but thank you for doing so. If we are going to discuss IQ let’s have a look at the link between Cognitive Ability and Rightwing/Racist views: ”Studies investigating the latter topic generally reveal lower cognitive ability to be associated with stronger endorsement of right-wing ideological attitudes and greater prejudice.” https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55893129.pdf “The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults.” https://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html “Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes: Lower Cognitive Ability Predicts Greater Prejudice Through Right-Wing Ideology and Low Intergroup Contact” https://www.jstor.org/stable/41417016

Ain’t that the truth?!

What’s the excuse for failing white Britons? They speak the language, have long term family and social connections, don’t have to deal with racism, they were born I in the UK, they won life’s lottery. Oh… sorry, I forgot. It’s always somebody else’s fault. Maybe, just maybe, the problem is a bit closer to home.

Don’t waste your time with these guys. Immigrants are out performing them in the job market, the children of immigrants are out performing their kids in school and university, immigrants are, through education and hard work rising to the top of companies, rising to the top of the professions and doing great in private business. Some folk respond with fear and hatred. There’s a reason for that.

Again, I’m not sure flying a helicopter is evidence of intellect. Hand eye coordination, spatial awareness maybe, I suspect having the right family name helps with being given the opportunity. Sorry, I’m not buying helicopter flying as an indication of intelligence. You need to look-up the meaning of ‘psychoanalysis’.

Asia is a possibility he could choose. The United States is not.

I wouldn’t describe someone who had to go begging £15,000 of a guy running a brothel in order to pay off his ex-wife’s debts as ‘someone with money’. https://www.newsweek.com/sarah-fergusons-money-troubles-prince-andrews-jeffrey-epstein-1473562

No I have not. But I’m not sure how that relates to him being bright, unless of course you are suggesting his family name had no bearing.

It’s owned by Hienz and made in The Netherlands. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_Sauce

What you do/have done is a matter for British law. Have sex with a trafficked 17 year old American and it becomes a matter for US law, I have already provided you one of the applicable statutes.

I don’t think Prince Andrew has ever been credibly accused of being bright.

There are many reasons why people are not charged under Federal Law, especially rich, powerful, well connected people. This has no bearing on ‘credible accusation’.

When did I say he was charged?