-
Posts
11,160 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by baboon
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:It won’t be implemented, it’s a political game.
Braverman thinks Truss is cooked, she’s playing to the racists and xenophobes in her bid to step into No 10 when Truss is kicked out.
But I think she is doing so because she is a genuinely nasty piece of work herself, not just an ultra cynic.
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
40 minutes ago, JonnyF said:Oh save it - darkest hour ????.
We both know they are perfectly safe in France. They are crossing the channel for better handouts, not to avoid persecution.
I don't know anything of the kind. But then I am not burning with hate and anger.
- 2
- 1
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:An excellent initiative.
Much as I would like to see this implemented overnight, I realise it could take some time. So in the meantime, I suggest they set up immigration detention centres to house these illegal economic migrants from France. I'd suggest making them similar in terms of style to the Thai immigration detention centres, only less luxurious. Then patrol the borders picking up the dinghy occupants and immediately take them to the detention centres to stay indefinitely. That should disincentivize the majority from coming to the land of handouts until the ban can be implemented.
We should also leave the ECHR. We should make our own standards on human rights and do not need Strasbourg to weaponize them against us as they did in the Rwanda debacle.
When it comes to your darkest hour of need, I can only hope and pray the same level of love and charity is bestowed upon you that you would inflict on others.
- 4
- 3
-
On 9/19/2022 at 9:47 PM, proton said:
My mate had an expensive hi fi stolen from his house in Leicester years ago, luckily a neighbour took the cars number plate. Short time later the thieves were caught with the loot still in the back of the car. However, no arrests were made as they claimed they had no idea how it got into the car, and it was not them who took it.!
It didn't happen like that at all.
Clearly the Police concluded there were insufficient grounds in order to prosecute. And besides, they are run off their feet.
Blame the party of Law and Order who decimated their ranks.
-
11 minutes ago, proton said:
Threads about a multicultural dump called Leicester, not Thailand. Muslims raping 12 year olds in the UK has nothing to do with westerners paying bar girls for sex here.
Exactly the kind of thing UK sex offenders tell themselves on their own wing in prison: 'Well I may have done this, but HE did that.'
Regardless, they are segregated from other prisoners who want to harm them. And really harm them.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
53 minutes ago, loong said:I doubt that any treaty says that they have to give asylum to people escaping from France!
Mind you, they should be deported back to France, not Rwanda.How are you going to do that if France refuses to take them back?
- 4
-
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:
I'll ignore the silly Hitler deflection. Here's another source for the same story.
I'd find a left wing source for you, but for some reason they seem to be ignoring the story about this left wing nurse showing her "Be Kind" credentials for the world to see. I can't think why...
And this has what to do with the Pound slumping to an all time low against the Dollar?
-
1 minute ago, JonnyF said:
Ah I see. Deflect with chilidish comments about the source rather than addressing the issue. Classy.
It was rubbish. And the Daily Mail did support Hitler. Don't have a go at me about it; take it up with them.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
21 minutes ago, Lucky Bones said:What happened to Boris?
Seemed like he was doing OK?
Thrown out by his own party due to his lies, corruption and incompetence.
- 3
-
Hmm.
I think they have misunderstood the savagery of the wider world. Who really cares, given what is going on elsewhere?
The willy-slinging contest is over. Who really cares what you are up to?
- 1
-
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, hotandsticky said:Now, why would I lie about knowing wealthy Labour supporters. I don't lie.
They were your wealthiest friends a few posts ago. At least keep your story straight.
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
57 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:A disgraceful pejorative generalization.
As well as untrue: 'Hey, I just spent 36 hours in Beijing. Don't try to tell ME anything about the Chinese...'
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:Unlikely.
From what I saw during my holiday last month, by the time these workshy benefit claiming chav scroungers walked a few steps to get into range and raised their hand they'd be exhausted, collapse onto their fat arzes and crush their "fags" upon landing.
A shortage of food for a few weeks probably wouldn't even bring these individuals down to the acceptable BMI range. It would probably save the NHS millions in diabetes medication.
You just made that up. Why, I have no idea, but you made it up.
- 3
- 1
-
3 hours ago, JonnyF said:
Perhaps a reduction in welfare payments will encourage them to go out and work for a living.
Or perhaps it will encourage them to crack you over the head and steal your gear.
-
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Exactly that.
Time for Truss to publish the economic plan she claims she’s working to.
A quote from another forum I find pertinent:
"It must be quite depressing being Truss and Kwarteng, knowing that you’re only in the job you are because you’re just a front for shady “think tanks” to try to rollout their tax/economic changes to suit their donors, without any of the negative impact to themselves."
- 2
-
4 minutes ago, RayC said:
The whole package is largely unfunded as it is underpinned by increased government borrowing. That's not the issue. The issue is why has this abrupt 'about turn' occurred?
I thought that the whole point of cutting the top rate of tax was that the increased spend of this group would generate demand and consumption in lower income brackets?
According to the PM yesterday, this was sound economic policy. If that's the case surely it is today? Where is the courage of her convictions?
She HAS convictions other than 'Me, me, me'...?
-
7 minutes ago, hotandsticky said:
It will be forgotten well within the 2 year survival deadline.
We'll see.
-
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
In the first instance you need to revisit the OP, while relevant to people living in Thailand on income from the UK the £/฿ is not the topic of discussion.
Secondly, the BoE has stepped in with £65Billion of quantitative easing in order to prop the pound up, the BoE have stated this is not a long term fix.
You do know they have just scrapped the tax cut for the rich?
- 1
-
16 minutes ago, JonnyF said:
I'd have to disagree. While the original policy was controversial, allowing the MSM and the opposition to pressure you into changing government policy really plays into their hands.
Before, they were screaming for a U-Turn. Now they will deride her for making a U-Turn. She should have stuck to her guns IMO. We shouldn't be governed by hysterical media commentators like James O'Brien or other left wing extremists.
No, they will be derided for introducing a policy so horrible that the country wouldn't stand for it, thus causing the U turn.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, hotandsticky said:I agree, but as said above, the Tories have time on their side and if they start to turn things around then Labour need to show substance that they don't appear to have - and Starmer needs to be more than a tin soldier.
They don't have time on their side: they are despised. And with good reason. Tax cuts for the wealthiest and cuts to social security? How does that work in a modern social democracy unless the objective is a right wing coup?
That said, Starmer needs to turn up the heat a bit. Quite a bit, or else the ERG will reduce us to slaves of corporate wealth: What institutions does the British state own, now? Water? No. Gas? No. Electricity? No. The railways? No, apart from Network Rail. The NHS? Well a bit, but we are working on it. Air Traffic Control? No, New Labour quietly flogged that off too.
Need I go on with privatised prisons?
If you don't have state institutions then you don't have a state. Or a country...
- 3
-
Credo:
I am NOT promoting anti-jab theory. But my mother just had her fourth jab and was literally smashed to the ground because of it.
As a personal decision, I won't bother having any more. When the time comes to die, well you die. Especially when you are over 50 like myself.
I pray for a merciful end to my life rather than a protacted one. Let them shoot me up then wheel me out...
-
- Popular Post
8 hours ago, nobodysfriend said:Given Putin's intention to annex part of the Ukraine , it would be a good lesson for him if the Ukraine became a NATO member in record time . If , ever , he decides to use Nukes on Ukraine , it would be a nuclear attack on NATO with all the consequences .
Yes, the death of us all.
But I do agree that the enemies of Putin need to look into his snake cold blue eyes and warn him that HE is on the list, not Russia or the Russians. Just him. And let that be known to the Russian people as best as we can.
And the what, quarter of a million people fleeing him, won't take much convincing.
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
At this point, I don't see what alternative we have other than take it on the chin. Lockdown again? We can't afford it and it isn't like Europe is not further up financial sh#t creek with the awful ongoing situation in Ukraine.
- 4
-
Couldn't they just have left Her Majesty's face on the existing GBPeso rather than blowing yet more money on changing the look of the currency for no real reason? What is the point of the exercise?
UK to propose asylum ban on English Channel migrants
in World News
Posted
This thread is not about the Labour Party. Or race.