Pique Dard

sorry for taking time before answering! i had a good laughter reading your answer, because you are saying exactly what i meant by asking if the fishing gear manufacturing...violations, i.e. THERE ARE OTHER VIOLATIONS, some more serious, yet no one protests. i rest my case.

above. it is called reportedly news. so what do you call the following, longer than the news, below

have you listened Poutine's defense? he said - and you can read this on most of social networks - he has done anything he could not to declare war. he has explained: nato which are the usa's armed arm wanted to place missiles there, i.e. in crimea . i repeat: HE SAID, not me! when the berlin wall fell, what did james baker said about nato? let me remind you, byt that time, nato had only 19 members vs 30 to-day. ONCE MORE, i dont't support war, i don't support poutine, i'm trying, based on facts, to explain russia's reaction

1. the first question. the answer is no BUT more more thant 15.000 who speak russian have been killed by ukranian soldiers dombass and donesk (not sure of the spelling) under 8 years now. 2. yes, see (1) 3. no, BUT russia don't want to be the USA's puppet either. and if ukrainia become nato's member, the USA = Nato will place missiles there. please read about the cuba crisis, the american invasion of grenade, james baker's statement.. i'm NOT a russian, not an ukranian, not an american. i'm AGAINST any kind of armed conflict. but honestly, one must analyse both sides deeds. i'm old enough to remember the vietnam war, every one was blaming cassius clay alias mohamed ali, calling him names ...because he refused to go nad fight, what happened afer that? where are we to-day? all these deaths, for what? that war could have been stopped immediately if some powerful politicians have taken time to think and to analyse the facts...

but not a wall against the usa imperialism? i tried to explain why poutine felt entitled to take this UNFORTUNATE decision, but most of the comments here accuse me of supporting the war!

i don't think you read my comments! read again please! and if you have time, read the history from the time the berlin wall fell... again, i've never said i support the war, i just want you "people" to understand the reasons that led russia to take this decision with serious consequences

lol! but it was you telling me i read wrong!

it'd too long to explain my point of view, so in short. 1. read james baker's statement about nato's expansion. at that time, nato had only 19 members, they are 30 now. 2. i don't agree with Russia's annexation oth the Crimea, BUT the fact is nato WANTED TO PLACE MISSILES THERE. 3. about "Encroaching of the border of Geargia", please read the (1). one more time, i'm against any kind of armed conflict, so i don't agree with Poutine, BUT he is reacting against the USA's policy. if i may say, please don't watch only cnn, bbc... watch other channels as well.! with a military budget ten times greater than that of the russians, the united states are not saints. how many military bases have the USA around the world? russia has 2 or 3 at the most.

... if you take time to read the history, i'm sure you'll see it's the other way round. that said, once more time, i don't support war

...right on the mark!

i'm REALLY sorry for saying this, but sometimes i can't help wondering if thai people really care about life! i've just watching a video on youtube: a so called baht bus in pattaya running the red lights at a junction just like that!

the question is WHY russia "invaded" ukraine? who remembers james baker "U.S. Secretary of State James Baker's famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion". this statement was made in 1990 and now suddenly has become a myth in some media! the current war isn't SPECIFICALLY against ukraine, it is against the expansion of nato. those are facts, however it doesn't mean i support the war.

freelancers! I hope girls working in the sex industry will read this offer

i want to believe what i read

...you are right and i agree with you! however nobody becomes "a hardened drug smuggler" just like that, there is always "the first time" and if you are unlucky you get caught

excellent! we now agree there are many other violations. so i expect you to tell me WHY "Prominent labor and human rights organizations" don't protest against those (violations)

this is what i think, the southafrican girl must have suspected more or less that something was fishy with her boyfriend. i mean, come on, she could have compared their lifestyle or ( her boyfriend's lifestyle) and the incomes from the restaurant... if her boyfriend ordered the package on her name, this is another story. if the package wasn't addressed directly to her, the police have no right to arrest her. finally, i wrote i'm suspicious but it doesn't mean i have reason to be

"Turning to humanitarian concerns, he called on parties to refrain from the use of force and to ensure the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure." just a time of time! none of the concerned parties will listen at that appeal

i'm not sure the secretary-general of the muslim world league has visited southern thailand

all these names just for a signature!

if i read right, those violations occurred only in the manufacturing of fishing gear?

i've seen worse!

allow me to doubt a bit! why to sign a package you haven't ordered? the address of the package was in whose name? two questions, two reasons to be suspicious

money talks and no amendment or law can prevent it from interfering

i don't know what kind of food makro produces, but don't give animals tohm yam goong! It is too spicy!