RayC

I've just spoken with H. and he's naturally extremely disappointed with your reactions. Nevertheless, he said that your're always welcome at his place if you change your minds.

Proves what? Given that Starmer was a member of the Labour Young Socialists while at school and the Labour club at university, I'd hazard a guess that there's a fair chance that he voted Labour in any elections.

Don't forget women and the working class. Democracy in the UK has never been the same since those groups were allowed to vote. I blame the Whigs and their progressive ideas.

National Rally conspired in exactly the same way by not standing in seats where The Union of the Far Right had candidates more likely to win. Presumably you also think that National Rally have made a massive strategic error which will backfire?

Given that NATO and Russia are both nuclear powers, the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction - which has the appropriate acronym MAD - would probably ensure that in the event of Russia launching a first strike nuclear attack Moscow, St. Petersburg and various other Russian cities will be razed to the ground. There is a simple solution: Putin withdraws Russian troops from Ukraine and respects Ukraine's international borders. Unfortunately, that outcome is about as likely as me winning the €50m Euro millions jackpot.

Thanks for posting that interesting article. The UK acting in isolation isn't going to greatly affect emissions, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't act: Someone has to take the lead. Imo all nations act in what they perceive as being in their own best interests rather than on behalf of "Team World".

Russian propaganda. Starmer pledged to continue the support shown to Ukraine by the previous Tory administrations which imo is the correct thing to do. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rferl.org/amp/uk-elections-ukraine-labour-starmer/33022866.html

I agree that the cost of net zero should be estimated, although that that calculation will involve a lot more complexity than some basic maths. Notwithstanding that, in your original post you seemed to reject "globalism"*? How can the UK thrive if it does? * Tbh I am never sure what people mean when they reject "globalism/ globalisation"? What is the alternative? Acting in isolation? Imo that is both undesirable and impractical.

How does an individual nation thrive then?

You either believe in FPTP or you don't. Which is it?

And you can supply no evidence to support your contention that the UK's relative "success" is due to Brexit. Moreover, you are cherry picking your countries and timescales to use as a comparison. Why not include Italy? If the UK/ Germany are similar in scale, so are the UK/ Italy. Why not set the timeline to July 2016 or February 2020? In any event, absolute size means little. Exports make up 50% of Germany's GDP vs. <30% of the UK's. A slowdown in the world's economic growth was always going to hit them harder. Having a (imo) weak Chancellor and government doesn't help either. I made no doomsday predictions. I believed that Brexit would have negative effects for the UK in almost all regards e.g. economically, culturally, diplomatically, etc. Almost all the research and reports to date have shown that to be the case. You claimed that Brexit would be beneficial for the UK. To date, there is little to suggest that is the case. Maybe being 6,000 miles away has shielded you from the facts.

Yes it is ridiculous, but you were less vocal about the result of the 2019 election when the Tories got an 80-seat majority with 43% of the vote.

Sorry busy morning. Anyway, I'm here now. And you attribute that "outperformance" to Brexit? Be good to see your workings. Btw since the referendum vote the UK has underperformed France on an annualised GDP growth basis (Source: World Bank)

It will be like Brexit then, with the responsible party unwilling to be accountable for its' failure (to date).

These are still isolated incidents albeit, unfortunately apparently on the increase. Why would acts of violence against homosexuals make liberals feel good about themselves? That makes no sense. Still no comment about the other racist incident?

You're way out in your timings! It's a shame that your post hasn't got an exact time-stamp. I'd hazard a guess that it took <2 minutes for the Labour hating comments to start.

So both the UK and Canadian governments willingly allow known terrorists into their respective countries in order to diversify and culturally enrich their respective nations? Yeah, right. I note that you avoid commenting about the Israeli nationalists chanting racist slogans.

That view is contrary to how British Muslims see themselves https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2018-03/a-review-of-survey-research-on-muslims-in-great-britain-ipsos_0.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiP78eqxY2HAxU-VqQEHc5cBf4QFnoECA0QBQ&usg=AOvVaw03eszbKhkyHiCx2I2YyeoF (Note: I only read the Executive Summary) You're right. Would you also agree that it's extremely likely that Muslims don't appreciate Jewish nationalists walking through Jerusalem chanting, "Death to Arabs"? (Note: This pre-dates the Hamas atrocity, so that can't be used to excuse these individuals) https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/world/israeli-crowds-chant-racist-slogans-taunt-palestinians-during-jerusalem-day-march Such appalling acts are not in the name of diversity. They are committed in the name of religious bigotry.

There is nothing "interesting" about my use of the word 'most', not is there any circle to square. The overwhelming majority of the UK population - irrespective of their gender, race, religion or any other attribute - are law-abiding. Therefore, I'd suggest that my contention that " ...most Muslim immigrants to the UK are not a threat to the fabric of British society" is correct. The case of the Batley teacher is appalling but is, fortunately, one of a few isolated incidents: I don't know the reason why no arrests have been made but, presumably, it has something to do with the police being unable to identify the individuals concerned? There is no blasphemy law - explicit or implicit - in the UK nor should there be imo. A government commissioned report entitled, 'Understanding and Responding to Blasphemy Extremism in the UK', was published in March. Hopefully, the new government will consider implementing its' recommendations https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-and-responding-to-blasphemy-extremism/understanding-and-responding-to-blasphemy-extremism-in-the-uk-accessible https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/31/batley-school-what-teacher-in-hiding-can-tell-us-about-our-failure-to-tackle-intolerance

You're talking to yourself!😉

Would you agree that most Muslim immigrants to the UK are not a threat to the fabric of British society?

Fine. But how exactly are Labour responsible for you being unable to buy a property when they are in government?

It is so easy to spot a Leaver who buries his head in the sand and will still not accept the evidence presented to him regarding the negative effects of Brexit. Here's a link outlining how the EU actually works https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-does-european-union-work I will ignore your advice and continue to moan about Brexit for as long as I see fit.

The EU is a Single Market therefore the comparison should be with that entity. In any event, there is little to suggest that being outside the EU has contributed much to the UK's economic growth. If France were to leave the EU would face a major crisis. However, given that National Rally have stated that they will seek to leave and the majority of the French public are overwhelming in favour of remaining a French exit from the EU in the foreseeable future is unlikely.

Unless they are Greek, your friends' views are not representative of their compatriot's. In fact, they are not representative of many people worldwide. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/10/24/people-broadly-view-the-eu-favorably-both-in-member-states-and-elsewhere/