Jump to content

Bert got kinky

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bert got kinky

  1. 2 hours ago, Lopburikid said:

    Correct!  Alcohol is legal, just because you don't want to drink it, doesn't mean it should be band!  It's like murder and rape, they aren't legal, but some people choose to commit these crimes, others don't. In ALL societies you are going to get those who break the law and those who respect the law. Look what happened in the 1920s , 1930s how many people (including innocent one) were murdered just because the government band alcohol. It the same with drugs same thing is happening, just a different product!

     

    just because you don't want to drink it, doesn't mean it should be band

     

    I didn't say that I wanted alcohol banned because I don't want to drink it.

    My statement was 'It's about time that this evil and dangerous drug got banned'.

    Alcohol has wrecked and taken far more innocent lives than prohibition (or any other drug) ever could and as long as it is legal, it will continue to do so.

     

     

    • Agree 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Lopburikid said:

    Just because it's there doesn't mean you have to drink it! It's people who create accidents, not the alcohol.

     

    What a very strange argument you field.

    So using your logic, should Heroin be legalized?

    After all, just because it's there, you don't have to shoot up.

    It's people that carry out the crimes to get their next fix, not the Heroin,

    • Agree 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    I've posted facts here, not pedantry, if you don't agree, please quote the specific "pedantry" but bear in mind that debunking glaringly false claims of "attempted murder" is not pedantry.   

     

    "Ever wonder why no one actually likes you?"

    No, I have not but whether you, or any other members of your gang, "like" me is both highly debatable and completely inconsequential.

     

    It is highly debatable whether I like you, how is it debatable?

     

    Also, as you believe that you know the answer to everything, please tell me about my 'gang'.

    How many members?

    Can you name one other member or are you just making this up to match your narrative?

     

     

     

     

  4. 9 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    It's also odd how some posters class a rational presentation of facts, debunking a clearly exaggerated and inaccurate claim, as pedantry.  Are you suggesting that you have "added" anything more worthy to this thread?

     

    More worthy than your constant barrage of pedantic remarks?

    Ever wonder why no one actually likes you?

     

    Grow up Lou, you'll make a fine grammar Nazi one day.

     

    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
  5. 7 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    Who on earth is going to be importing goods valued at B1?  The reference to B1 was simply to explain that, currently, imports valued at less than B1500 (B1-1,500)  are duty-free.  

     

    It was a hypothetical question, is that beyond your understanding?

     

    Just to explain that to you:

    A hypothetical question is one based on supposition, not facts. They are typically used to elicit opinions and beliefs about imagined situations or conditions that don't exist.

     

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
  6. 4 minutes ago, WHansen said:

    It is already illegal to sell weed with more than 0.2% THC, has been since it was decrim'd a couple of years ago. They were very clear about that. Those that invested heavily in bud that was illegal to sell for recreational use are now whining that they are going to lose money

    It is already illegal to sell weed with more than 0.2% THC

    No it is not, it is illegal to sell extracts with more than 0.2% THC but the flower/bud was not classed as an extract.

     

    They were very clear about that.

    No they were not, they were not clear on any of it, which is why nobody understands the current situation.

     

     

    • Thanks 2
×
×
  • Create New...