.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
- Popular Post
cbtstorm
-
Posts
161 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by cbtstorm
-
-
They need this impeachment badly as a media show. as the coup plot failed and declass is going to take center stage.
-
1
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:
The ‘American People’ did not elect Trump, that was the ‘Electoral College’.
It's always the electoral college.
-
1
-
-
Considering Steele is/was a crown asset, id say Trump can say whatever he wants if one wants to comment about interference.
im sure there will be some zingers on this trip.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Cryingdick said:
Not sure what Avenatti has to do with Mueller speaking. He was the left's darling poster boy for awhile.
mistake, it left over from an unfinished post.
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:
Quick everybody get your batsuit pajamas on. Mueller is do to speak in less than an hour.
no q and a, just a statement.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:Classic. Won't make any difference to the resistance though. Trump is guilty of something, in their opinion, and they will find it even if it takes demanding every piece of paper he ever used, and interrogating every person he ever talked to.
"While we recognize that the man did not actually steal any horses, he is obviously guilty of trying to resist being hanged for it." the resistance
-
4
-
1
-
1
-
1 hour ago, mogandave said:
Assange is a hero to the left, not the right. I think he should be executed.I dont know about left/right but people who want to know the real workings love
info wherever it comes from.
wikileaks is just another outlet . its a dropbox.
Assange could have info of where his data originated. dowloaded to a thumbdrive, hard disk, or trsnsported over the network. whether it was an unathorised hack,
or access via password, unsecured server.
how much data & how long it took etc could answer questions .
Muellers investigation should have included all this.
I think Barrs will.
-
50 minutes ago, heybruce said:
That's not what you posted.
On the subject of "campaign gold", how about Trump stating "I love Wikileaks"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUtT0b0EnSw
probably 2016 campaign gold as well. wikileaks has a lot of fans.
which is also why many who have voted for Trump are not liking these indictments against assange and wont be same gold for 2020.
-
2 hours ago, mogandave said:
The “lol” is not something of a tip-off?
The idea of Trump or Hillary either one seriously asking a foreign country for political assistance on TV is ridiculous.
Hillary’s was a hypothetical, Trump’s was a joke.not if your looking for entrapment with this crew. like prosecutors lol
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
23 minutes ago, heybruce said:My apologies, it was cbstorm who posted:
"Wikileaks had some serious stuff, id encourage it too especially since she had private servers to circumvent foia requests and who knows whatelse
shady dealings she had."
However I never indicated I supported hacking, I just posed the question to cbstorm if his encouragement of hacking extended to hacking someone so recklessly unconcerned with security as Trump.
What I meant by condoning the results of hacking is clear; Trump encouraged people to go to Wikileaks and look at the hacked material. How can that not be an endorsement of the hacking?
id encourage people learning of the news thst wikileaks revealed in regards to hidden unsecured servers. thats campaign gold.
-
3
-
6 hours ago, bristolboy said:
I wasn't defending her contention. I was pointing out that cbtstorm offered a false version of the story.
she said it in jest as with trump. not a false version. point being that what Trump said does not imply collusion as previously implied.
you sure do get triggered and jump the gun a lot. you got checked last time and fled. lol
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 minutes ago, riclag said:This thread ain’t about mueller In case you didn’t notice it’s about the declassification of files which will lead up to a investigation by the special prosecutor .
easy to go off topic just answering to a comment.
Barr will look into whether these fisa warrants were applied for and issued
properly.
they can hash it out in court if he finds any funny business. no dif than what flynn or Papadopoulos had to do. Barr is not the final judge so its all just defense posturing imo
-
3
-
1 hour ago, heybruce said:
From page 15 of the Mueller report:
"In November 2017, a Facebook representative testified that Facebook had identified 470 IRA-controlled Facebook accounts that collectively made 80,000 posts between January 2015 and August 2017. Facebook estimated the IRA reached as many as 126 million persons through its Facebook accounts. In January 2018, Twitter announced that it had identified 3,814 IRA-controlled Twitter accounts and notified approximately 1.4 million people Twitter believed may have been in contact with an IR controlled account."
That's my three sentence fair-use limit on TV, but there is a lot more in the Mueller report about Russian interference.
Now that I've destroyed your claim that "Russian interference is a joke", why don't you attempt to support your other specious claims with some credible sources?
Regarding your encouraging Wikileaks to hack Hillary Clinton's private server; Trump continues to use a private phone against all security rules and requests that he stop. Would you encourage Wikileaks to hack his phone as well?
facebook deleted 3 billion fake accounts.
this ira nonsense of 470 accounts is meaninless. drop in the ocean.
same for twitter, no context as to what those tweets are about or their reach.
drop in the ocean
both companies inflate their size for ad dollars. another scandal in itself.
truth is your cadidate sucked and lost.
billions
nonetheless nothing to do with Trump.
-
1
-
2
-
-
12 minutes ago, Morch said:
Nope, that would be you deflecting again. I replied to a direct comment, you chose to intercede and move the goal posts.
Spin it all you like, Barr's presentation of the Mueller report does not support high regard for his credibility on such matters. Your claim that Barr is "attacked....before any declassification" - in response to posts citing his conduct on Mueller's report is bizarre. He's attacked precisely because he recently demonstrated his credibility on this is questionable.
Enjoy your fantasies.
3 years of a failed fantasy. ofcourse any Ag will be in the same position if
no collusion and no obstruction was decided based on Barrs understanding
of the statue.
Basicslly if you dont get your way, then only thing left is to cry foul. standard loser tactic just an extension of the resposnse to election results.
im enjoying the show. thx.
buckle up, its gonna be a bummpy ride.
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
9 minutes ago, heybruce said:Why would anyone think Trump was a Russia agent? Oh, I remember:
All US intelligence agencies agreed that Russia interfered with the 2016 election.
Trump was running a "Let's be friends with Russia" campaign while pursuing a major real estate deal in Moscow.
Trump asked Russia to hack Hillary's emails.
Trump encouraged everyone to check out Wikileaks, which was releasing emails hacked by Russia.
Trump hired lots of people for his campaign with shady Russia connections.
didnt hrc recently ask china to release Trump tax returns lol
Russian interference is a joke, even google ceo admitted some russian firm spent less than 5,000 grand for ads that half of which ran after the election.
Wikileaks had some serious stuff, id encourage it too especially since she had private servers to circumvent foia requests and who knows whatelse
shady dealings she had.
We still dont know who hacked her hidden servers, as fbi outsourced that info to Crowstrike, a firm paid by you know who.
its all coming, hang tight.
-
2
-
1
-
2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Morch said:The AG's credibility, with regard to declassification of documents, is already proven to be a dubious affair.
No the real dubious affair was the last three years. "Trump a russian agent"
Dems went all out on this and we'll get to the bottom of why. I suspect its not just an election loss.
Ofcourse attacking barr is just standard defense tactic even before any declassification. I wont matter though. I wonder who will be indicted first.
or will it be several at once.
-
3
-
1
-
19 minutes ago, candide said:
The critics are about 'selective' declassification, not declassification. I guess all people whom are critical to Barr are for full transparency: declassification of all documents without selection by Barr.
Dr. Barr is a proctologist, this is gonna hurt. But they are gonna claim he left something up inside no matter what.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
9 minutes ago, heybruce said:Are you kidding? Being the Cover-up General is why Trump appointed him. Barr never sees anything being done by the President as a crime. Now he's gone one step further and is promising to "find" crimes for the President. The concern is that he will invent crimes where none exists.
declassification of documents bring you concerns. so you attack the Ag credibility. defense 101
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, heybruce said:Do you mean the independent journalists that tell us 911 was done by the CIA, the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre never happened, Hillary Clinton is running a child pedophile ring from the basement of a pizza restaurant, etc.?
the great unraveling of this Trump Russia conspiracy hoax investigation is here. We will eventually find out the origins, the construction, then players. some heads are gonna roll.
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 minutes ago, heybruce said:You spend way too much time on conspiracy theory websites.
ah you're probably right???? but its too fascinating of a storey to leave it to msm
activist posing as journalists to weave.
the good stuff is behind the curtains at which we can only speculate and independent journalists are trail blazing. unfortunately it seems those articles are not allowed in this msm safezone. oh well.
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
its all gonna unravel. who and when did they know the uk dossier was junk.
who paid for it? exactly how much etc.
what and when did the white house know.
did they spy/surveil other candidates? ? and from when
The HAMR and how extensively it was used by past admin.
what happend in Italy with Mifsud and who employs him.(italian intel heads fired recently)
who are the leakers inside fbi to media. all of that and more.
etc etc, its all coming to theater near you. The biggest scandal in American history. no amount of screeching, spinning, projecting, misdirecting or obfuscating is going to help the plotters and their media colluders.
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
22 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
In an America where the Attorney General is running prosecutions of the President’s political opponents then Obama and HRC are wise to engage lawyers.
This abuse of power is a threat to them and to democracy.
thats really rich after having failed at a coup.
-
2
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Declass is just the first step. eventually I think this will lead to military tribunals
for some of the actors. Treason, sedition are serious charges.
-
2
-
1
-
2
-
5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:
What a bunch of losers. He knows what they think of him and I doubt he cares a jot. None of them can vote against him.
What they should be protesting, along the lines of the yellow vests, is the appalling fiasco that is the present British government.
However, I guess Trump owns their brains
.
didnt they raise money for this already? now they need 30k again!
they should have sold key chain size baby trump to raise the funds but that would be too entrepreneurial for leftist community organizers.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
.
SURVEY: Time to start impeachment proceedings?
in World News
Posted · Edited by cbtstorm
added
a five eye stitch up if you prefer.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/02/donald-trump-prepared-challenge-may-uk-role-starting-russian/
Facts are they spied on a cadidate, president elect, then president to bring him down and failed based on unvetted salacious allegations by foreign intel operators and failed.