placeholder

Please share with us your evidence of this. I won't be holding my breath whilst I wait.

Please share with us what has changed about the Biden story in relation to Burisma or Victor Shokin. Devon Archer specifically testiifed that Hunter told him he had nothing to do with Joe Biden coming to Ukraine at all. Archer also said that other members of Burisma and Biden's company told him that Shokin's firing was a bad thing since the CEO of Burisma had Shokin under control.

First off, where is the evidence that any of this money came from the governments of China, Russia or Ukraine? Was it a crime to do business with companies located in China, Russia, or Ukraine? Because if it was, thousands of business people should now be occupying jail cells. In fact, the so called Russian payment came from an oligarch who fled Russia because of a dispute she had with the Russian govt. She's wanted for arrest by the Russian govt. She's lived in the UK since 2010. And that's where that payment came from.

What Archer also repeatedly sent, and what the Daily Mail remarkably fails to note, is that Devon Archer was repeatedly asked if, during any of these conference calls, was any business discussed. He emphatically and repeatedly said no business was discussed. The conversations consisted of pleasantries. And Archer said "about 20 phone calls" not 24. Archer also noted that Joe Biden and his son spoke to each other every day over the phone. Archer said these phone calls occurred over a period of 10 years. That would average out to 2 phone calls per year. Given that they spoke every day, has it even been proven that Joe Biden knew his son was with business associated when these 20 calls were made?

One can only hope because so far there is zero incriminating evidence.

First off, when is James Comer to be trusted on anything he says? As far as I can tell, his committee hasn't released documents that actually prove that these people received payment from monies that originated in China or Russia. But, for the sake of argument, let's assume it's 9 or even 12. Are any of those people named Joe Biden? So what does the number of people have to do with proving that Joe Biden is corruptly involved?

As I've pointed out before, those figures aren't just for payments to the Biden family but to Hunter Biden's associates as well. But whatever the amount that ended up with Hunter Biden and 2 others connected to the Biden family, your contention that this qualifies as evidence that Joe Biden was in on it is nonsense. As Devon Archer testified. Hunter Biden told him repeatedly that he was using his father's name to get business. But that, in reality, he had no influence him. I have no doubt that various characters in China and Eastern Europe hoped to profit from the fact that Hunter Biden was Joe Biden's son. But this does not qualify as evidence that Joe Biden actually profited from Hunter Biden's dealing or that he was in on Hunter Biden's plans. Whereas there is a huge amount of hard evidence to show that Trump lied about this possession of the documents and obstructed justice.

I did use the quote to see if google could track it down. Here's the quote: "President Joe Biden has revealed that he’s asked Congress for funding to develop a new Covid vaccine, asserting that “everybody” will take the shot. Speaking to reporters, Biden said his administration will require all U.S. citizens to take the new shot, “no matter whether they’ve [been vaccinated] before or not.” Here's Google's reply No results found for "President Joe Biden has revealed that he’s asked Congress for funding to develop a new Covid vaccine, asserting that “everybody” will take the shot. Speaking to reporters, Biden said his administration will require all U.S. citizens to take the new shot, “no matter whether they’ve [been vaccinated] before or not.”.

Can you share with us what damage has been done that's due to Joe Biden?

And some of us still don't see a problem with that. Can you explain why it's a problem?

This nonsense has been tried on already. There was nothing in Hunter Biden's email that required access to those documents. That information could easily have been gathered from news sources and Wikipedia. All that accusation has to support it is speculation.

Why do you keep on repeating the same falsehoods about documents. The crime wasn't that Trump had them in his possession. One crime is that once they were requested back he refused. Another crime is that he lied about being in continued possession of documents after the claiming that all had been returned.. That's obstruction of justice. He also lied about his claim that he had declassified all the documents. We know that because there's an audiotape of him confessing to that. As for "interference". You've tried that one on before. Trump and other Republicans are still s making accusations of actual widescale and massive election fraud. Democrats claims are about Russian intervention, and various rulings designed to make it harder for voters likely to vote Democratic to cast their ballots.

There's a ton of unequivocal evidence to convict Trump in the Mar-a-Lago case. There is nothing like that that has so far been revealed in the case of Joe Biden. No good evidence at all.

Not just false but dishonest. Red Phoenix made up a quote.

Townhall may have misrepresented his quote, you actually made one up. That is dishonest.

First off, your quote above is a lie. Biden said no such thing. Stop making things up. As for the article you quoted, it's lying too. It represented that the following is what Biden said when asked if he would make a vaccination mandatory: "Yes, I can," Biden said. "I signed off this morning on a proposal we have to present to Congress a request for additional funding for a new vaccine that is necessary, that works." But here's what he was really answering: "Biden, who is vacationing in the Lake Tahoe area, was asked by a reporter on Friday if he could say anything about the uptick of COVID cases and a new variant." "Yes, I can," Biden said. "I signed off this morning on a proposal we have to present to Congress a request for additional funding for a new vaccine that is necessary, that works." https://news.yahoo.com/biden-plans-ask-congress-funding-003513892.html

Get a memory check. Mueller specifically said were Trump not President he would have recommended several counts against him on the charge of obstruction of justice. However, you are correct in a way about the fact that no reference was made to collusion. That's because collusion isn't a crime.

I know what you mean. It's disgusting what Democrats are calling Republicans: 'Human scum:' Donald Trump has harsh comments for 'Never Trumper' Republicans Having attacked some of his critics as "Do Nothing Democrats," President Donald Trump reserved a harsher term Wednesday for "Never Trumper Republicans" who continue to opposed him amid an impeachment inquiry. "Human scum." "The Never Trumper Republicans, though on respirators with not many left, are in certain ways worse and more dangerous for our Country than the Do Nothing Democrats," Trump tweeted Thursday. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/23/donald-trump-describes-republican-critics-human-scum/4076555002/

In a way, what they're saying could be true. By continually filing baseless motions Trump's legal team managed to delay the gathering of evidence and the onset of various trials.

Oops. The year should have been 2010.

You got a link for that?

Do you understand that Switzerland has signed many agreements with the EU and pays into it for the privilege of being connected? You think a similar arrangement for the UK would be a good idea?

If ever there was a case of self-inflicted damage, it's Donald Trump's.

I get it. If some is arrested, that's because they are a threat to somebody. Not because that they actually committed a crime. Or crimes.

"Latent" is the scientific term. But so what? Dormant is perfectly clear. Another feature of denialists is that they confuse semantics with science.