Patong2021

Perhaps, but one certainly needs markets to sell products and suppliers who will sell critical raw materials. Do not under estimate the Chinese. They can sustian long term pain. US nationals are chronic complainers. They riot when Popeye's runs out of chicken. The US is picking fights with everyone and it cannopt go it alone. Are you He did not win by a landslide. He did not even receive a majority of votes cast. Are you intentionally wrong or are you really this ignorant of the vote result?

Have you been in some US cities like Philadelphia where the zombies walk? Or rural towns in in West Virginia and Kentucky ravaged by Hillbilly Heroin? Druggies rob and steal and kill to get their fix.

75%+ of the. Panama canal workforce came from The majority of the workers on the Panama Canal came from the West Indies, including Barbados, Jamaica, Grenada, Martinique, and Trinidad. 90%+ of deaths were these people. Your logic holds that their homelands can lay claim to the canal. Panama exists as a nation because it gained its independence in 1821 from Spain. It then joined with other states to form a greater Columbian Republic under the great Simon de Bolivar. Panama then split from Columbia The USA was involved because it sought to act as a colonial power. The USA has no right to meddle in Latin America. The USA is not in charge. All that the USA is doing is to force the world to look away from purchasing US products and to become more self reliant.

Nope. Recent illustrations; Britney Spears, Wendy Williams, Amanda Bynes , Brian Wilson (Beachboys), and Michael Oher (a dead wringer for Kanye). There has to be someone who cares, and right now, Kanye is being exploited by his entouragem, who need him free so they can earn their money. Maybe not full fledged members of the party, but most certainly encouraged to be affiliates and supporters. In the past the German Nazis were supported by the Grand Mullah of Jerusalem who sent his muslim militia to fight for the nazis. Iran currently funds extemist right wing groups with the intent of causing civil disorder.

Cocaine is a deadly addictive drug. The people laughing off the legalization are not prepared for the tens of thosuands of zombies that would be created.

The USA has no legal basis to take over the canal. Long before the US could gain control of the canal, it might very well be destroyed. I don't think the US population has the stomach to take the casualties that would occur if the USA occupied Panama. More importantly, invading Panama would require a declaration of war and it is unlikely Congress would authorize it. The USA risks a guerrilla war in Latin America. No US citizen would be safe.

You have not though this through, nor have you addressed the central issue of why it is the USA's sole obligation to care for people in a far off region, a region which does not support the USA's national interests. The US government is there to act in the best interest of its citizens. Currently, the USA has a massive deficit. It also has a financial obligation to its own citizens. In order to maintain the generous social assistance network in the USA, it has to be funded. The USA can't keep borrowing to fund its social services disbursements. You are free to criticize the USA. Good for you. Now please direct your anger at your own nation and region and demand that it pay more for people who don't care about you. Thailand has its nose up China's backside. Now it can ask China to provide the vast sums of foreign aid that the USA, Japan and other western nations provide. The USA was at its breaking point. It can't keep giving, because it doesn't have the money to give. The small group of taxpayers who pay for much of this spending don't want to fund it anymore. They want the money to go to repairing collapsing infrastructure and poorvpeople in the USA.

She was previously deported and has come back. Non compliance with the. immigration rules after a previous incident is a serious offence. Add to that the circumstantial allegation that she is a prostitute and it doesn't look good. My guess is that she has pissed off a Russian pimp and the Russians aren't helping as a means of teaching her a lesson.

Again, I ask, why it is the USA's responsibility? Yes, Musk is an evil man, but that is a side issue. Where is it either the legal or moral obligation to care for people who have no relationship to the USA and in a country that has hitched its wagon to the Chinese choo choo train.

They are having a field day becaus eof the presence of the pimply faced kids who have destroyed any semblance of security for the government's IT systems.

It is unfortunate. However, please explain why the USA is responsible for paying for the medical care for these people? China is a major presence in the region. Where is its aid money? What about India, Iran , Russia and the Gulf states? They too have many of their people in the area, more so than the USA, so they should be. contributing.

Nice troll. Everyone knows that the Apple products are most resistant to Russian and Chionese spying.

He will be colour coordinated.

Really? Is this a characteristic common to brothel type bars?

At some point, I expect that more than a few Republicans are going to wish this wasn't an issue as their rentboys and shemale companions start sharing information.

If you want to get technical and be historically accurate, much of the Gaza population are arab occupiers. The population prior to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire was small and there was a jewish population. There were arabs, but they were mostly Bedouin. The core arab population has no familial ties to the majority of arabs who now live in Gaza. During WWI the Turks expelled jews from Gaza,. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the jews returned. Much of their property had been looted or was occupied by Arabs. With the partition of British occuped Israel, and Transjordan, and the custody of Gaza assigned to Egypt, Gaza became host to a large Arab population who were told by Arab nations to leave the state of Israel as it would be destroyed. Many migrated to Gaza. The Bedouin were driven from their lands by occupying non resident arabs. The indigenous arab families saw their lands and properties seized by arab migrant squatters. And now we come to great enlightened political pundits like you. Your position ignores the rights of the Bedouin, and the original arab clans, most of whom had no problem with their Israeli neighbors. Your position dipossesses these arabs in favour of a large and dominating group of arabs who are foreign to Gaza. If you were to say, that Bedouin grazing rights, and the original Gaza tribal clan property claims must be respected and their lands reurned then you would be arguing from a position of moral integrity. Unfortunately, you are not.

Criticize him all you want, but at least Trump has tried to come up with an option that will treat the arabs humanely, and to faciliate and support peace and prosperity. The current methods don't work.

Let go of the pearls clara. The Thais who are allowed into western countruies are doing the work that westerners won't and/or cannot do. The Thais are primarily employed on farms and in the hospitality sector. Are you able to cook Thai food in a restaurant under pressure, or work as farm labour? If so, you can replace the Thais, who are there because there is no one competent locally.

It is easy to see who has never made a sizeable donation to charity or to the government. 🙂 You can't even insult Biden with an accurate statement. It most certainly will be. I suppose that since you do not make charitable contributions,you can't be expected to know much about tax policy in the free world. Not really. He would be fronting the funds. You are correct. Here is how these things work. - One person sponsors the project. They then ask friends, clients, suppliers and supporters to participate. - Approx. 50% of the donation is deductible from income, which is a generous tax reduction. In effect, money that would have otherwise been paid in tax is instead diverted to a preferred project. If the lead fundraiser is good, much of the project is paid for by others who will also contribute. This is nothing new, and is used by large companies and the wealthy to manage their tax liabilities. It isa generous offer by Trump in the sense that it will take some time to organize. He would however get credit and most likely naming rights to the room. The fact is that the US government is paying for the tent rentals. A built for purpose facility would be more cost effective. Nothing wrong with the Trump proposal, and I agree with him, that having the events in a tent is low end.

The USA does not screen when leaving. Only people on the do not fly list will be flagged at checkin. Unless his passport was cancelled, he can travel.

A proposal is a starting point. One does not need to negotiate first in order to make a proposal for discussion. You interpret according to your bias. I understand it from the perspective of a property/real estate developer with a vision. The USA will assume project management and control of the project. The intent is to minimize the potential for corruption and for terrorist infrastructure being built back. What is so wrong in hoping to give the people a safe and prosperous place to live? You are projecting your own bias. Trump approached this from his experience and perspective as a project initator and developer. He dreams big. What he has proposed is a working concept. It will be adjusted and modified going forward to reflect the needs and interests of stakeholders. To date, Trump is the only person to come up with a viable concept. No one else, including the Arabs has offered anything better than building back ugly concrete structures complete with military dual purpose. The Europeans and USA are expected to pay for it . What is the point of repeating past errors?

USAID is accountable to the US Congress.

If the person suggesting this was not named Trump, and if it was anyone else other than Arabs of Gaza involved, the proposal would be described as generous, compassionate and brilliant. North Gaza is uninhabitable. If people return, the area will not be able to be rebuilt quickly and without the same issues as before with military installations embedded into residential areas, schools and hospitals. Trump is not proposing a permanent move. It is temporary, to allow the rapid rebuilding and development of the area. A multibillion$/Euro business has been built out of the chronic need for financial aid for Gaza. European aid agencies make their livings from this as does UNRWA. An arab bureacracy and wealthy class depends on the flow of aid money. Much of the population does not work, not for the lack of opportunity, rather they are paid to sit around. The Trump proposal will break the dependency and give the opportunity of prosperity and self determination to the people of gaza. The Trump plan also ensures that the billions in aid will be used to buld a community and not finance terrorism. No arab nation will publicly support this because they are afraid to, not because they think it is wrong. Every arab leader knows what happened to Jordan's king Abdullah and Anwar Sadat when they were pragmatic. The Hamas millionaires will be opposed and Iran will fight the plan. There is no ethnic cleansing and no war crime in the proposal.

I have a feeling she was being aggressive on her scooter and her target was having none of it.

Yes, it is a good idea to control the debt. It will require a sharp knife and a willingness to step on toes etc. However, the US has a constitution and is supposedly a nation subject to the rule of law. There is something quite concerning about unelected, unvetted and unknown people acting without transparency. The US Congress controls the purse of the USA. Dismantling agencies and departments that Congress has initiated, or has a right to oversee, without the knowledge or consent of Congress is undemocratic. Musk has conflicts of interest with the groups he is attacking. Let a neutral person without a conflict of interest take responsibility.