ctxa

4 minutes ago, Scott Tracy said:

 

Hold on now. You are sure the guys who 'bash' Thai drivers fail to comply with the laws and customs of Thailand? I see one so called 'farang' riding without a helmet. Has this guy written something on here about Thais failing to comply, or are you just stereotyping?

If not the helmet, then they for sure mess up other things while on the road. We are all far from perfect drivers, but those who bash others’ races for the way they drive tend to be the ones who end up messing up the biggest. At the end of the day, they are uneducated folks themselves.

I just used that picture as an example that we farang are always preaching about traffic laws, and how good drivers they are and blah blah, but then in the road you see many driving without helmet as a matter of fact.

30 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

You obviously do not understand ''humor'' sad!!

Well, I don’t think it was humor. It was a typical post which you can absolutely expect from someone whose username is “Pravda”. 
 

Shall we talk about how many Mercedes-Benz CPSU General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev had in his collection, while a major part of the population of the country he lead was living in total poverty?

9 minutes ago, possum1931 said:

Wrong. People riding without helmets can only damage themselves, people riding while using their phone are also risking damaging other road users, think about it.

Back in Spain. Since healthcare expenses are fully paid by the state, and hence every tax-payer citizen. We used to say that people riding without helmets damages them all taxpayers. Since after he smashed his head against the asphalt the government is gonna have to fork out a nice couple of tens of thousands of euros of taxpayers money to pay for his brain surgery which could have been avoided by a helmet.????????

In Thailand, nobody is gonna pay for your surgery except yourself and/or the insurance which you yourself paid. So I agree that it hurts nobody. 
 

Nevertheless, both of them should be properly prosecuted by LE and then less and less people would do it. Though I can tell you that tough enforcement of a law doesnt necessarily always work. In China the traffic police is very serious about enforcing the no mobile phone while driving law, to the point they even installed AI cameras to detect when somebody is using the phone. Yet everyone does it, even myself I got quite several fines and lost several points back in China thanks to the damned phone ????????‍♂️ I told you guys, I am neither any sort of angel or perfect driver on the road ????????‍♂️????????‍♂️

42 minutes ago, seajae said:

my wife must  be a thai racist then going by your comment as she bashes thai road users all the time, she says they too unneducated or just too arrogant to ride/drive correctly and follow the road rules, they think they dont apply to them or are unable to think at all, I must admit I agree with her 100% as the road death/injury figures back this up completely. But then she is a well educated  thai and she actually thinks before she does things, she is also a pretty good driver unlike many road users

You know very well that what I am talking about definitely is not the typical swear words that one says after we come across someone who we think is driving badly ???? (and I say this because many times it’s just the pot calling the kettle back, gotta be real) 

Nah, that’s normal. Everybody does that. And you would act the same regardless of they were they Thai, American, Japanese or South African… 

But the type of bashing I am talking about is something very common from a handful (thankfully not many members of this forum). Example: 

Thread: My phone is not charging since yesterday. Any suggestions? 
 

Reply 1: Are you sure you are getting proper electricity to the charger? Electricity here in LOS sucks, you get spikes all the time, sometimes you even lose one phase of current, all the wiring is done by lazy fellas and blah blah goes on ranting about how life here in LOS sucks and how good it was back home for a whole hour. ????????????
 

Same pretty much they do about the roads. 

31 minutes ago, fdsa said:

OK, let me rephrase your wording to make it look less silly.

 

 

-> you ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT hack anybody with just their IP if there is a firewall between you and that IP that filters absolutely everything and if there is no vulnerable software running on the computer with that IP and if there is no Microsoft Windows installed on the computer with that IP

Don’t overdo it either. I could give you a list of 10,000 home IPs (not servers). And I’m sure you won’t be able to get a shell in any device behind either of them. (Just a saying, I obviously don’t have 10,000 home IPs, it’s an example)
 

The point still stands. Having someone’s IP doesn’t necessarily mean you can hack them.  Because you don’t hack an IP (you CANT), you hack through whatever insecure thing there is behind that IP. An IP is like an address, some houses in those addresses will have armed security guards at the doors, and others will have open doors through which you can easily go through. It still is not the address fault ????

Any website we visit logs our IPs (unless you use VPN or Proxies that is of course). And many of those websites eventually get hacked by hackers exposing all those IPs to the hacker. If it was that easy to hack through an IP alone, then we would all be hacked. A full RCE like EternalBlue is something very unfortunate and very rare too. In 99.9% of the cases, a home IP itself alone won’t be enough to hack the person behind it. Can we at least agree on this?

PS: That IP won’t belong to any specific computer. It will belong to a router. So that’s gonna be your first huge problem as a hacker, slipping through that NAT into the computer you wanna hack. Ufff, you better have a 0-day exploit which allows for RCE in some service which is doing udp hole punching, or there is port forwarding set up and active in that router for the device which is specifically is your target and therefore you can slip through that NAT into the device. Else let’s see how you figure it out ????

Lots of IFs, lots of IFs, judge yourself…

Funny how many hackers there are here in TVF. Unfortunately it seems to me that hacking just like many other things is easier written at a forum than done. Id love to see what you guys would manage to pull off in real life???? I am inclined to believe that it would be between nothing and nada 

13 minutes ago, fdsa said:

tell that to ransomware victims that were hacked through IP with these vulnerabilities. Also google for "NAT slipstreaming" if you still believe in almighty firewalls.

 

- no, you can.

NAT Slipstreaming AFAIK requires of social engineering. (Somebody at the other side of the network has to open a connection to a remote server in order to open a port through which the attacker can access). So it’s not just I grab an IP and I hack it.
 

Point still stands, in theory there is absolutely nothing to hack in an IP. If you find an IP in which somebody left a backdoor,  or it has an open port to certain unsecured service. Then sure, but you’re not hacking through the IP. You’re hacking through a backdoor or through an unsecured service ???????????? 

in the case of EternalBlue IPs weren’t to blame, RDP was.

7 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

ok stop crying like a baby, I don't care about your crapware, we are discussing BLC here ????

 

ok trust, right. What makes you think the technology found a way for trust. By doing billions of calculations to verify the integrity of the character chains? that's not trust, that's calculating validity and integrity. And there are other simpler and faster ways to calculate the integrity of the data. Those billions of calculations is the insecure answer of insecure individuals with Asperger or Autism who have a personal relationship problem with trust.

 

Verifying a billions times that your door is locked, is not really being efficient or even useful. Trust is not doing the same things billions of time like in a tourette syndrome. That's actually being insecured.

Ok. There are other simpler and faster ways to calculate the integrity of the data. Yes. And who is gonna verify it? A central figure, who can be corrupted, who can be biased. And above all, who may very well take a fee for providing those services (take eBay, Amazon, PayPal as an example) . 
 

The blockchain requires no central figure in order to get that trust. I know there are alternatives like DAG (IOTA), etc etc… 

But the point is? Did either of them exist before Blockchain? Nope, Blockchain was the first, and all those come from the idea of BLC. Same dog with a different lace. My point still stands. Maybe why you didn’t understand or I didn’t make clear enough is that when I talk about Blockchain I am talking about a Decentralized Trust solution, it doesn’t necessarily have to be the Bitcoin Blockchain. 

5 minutes ago, fdsa said:

What does stop the major Chinese mining pools owning more than 70% of Bitcoin hashrate to run a 51% attack on Bitcoin?

 

your knowledge is lacking, preserve on your quest.

 

What you’re showing there is a Microsoft RDP vulnerability. A properly configured firewall can prevent it, and has nothing to do with hacking through IP. 
 

It’s the same as saying, I put a bind tcp backdoor in your computer. Sure I use your IP to connect to it, but because the backdoor is there. With the IP itself I can’t do anything ????

in the case of EternalBlue, there was a backdoor, crappy MS RDP 

5 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

out of curiosity, please list the advantages you personally think that BLC has that no other technology could match ????

 

that should be fun LOL ????

trust, mate, trust. It’s trust. The point of BLC. 
 

You’re so nagging and annoying. What you call little crapware websites feeds thousands of people’s kids around the globe in the year of Corona. You on the other hand do nothing and help nobody, just laying in the sofa watching Mr.Robot. 
 

Go google about “X-Activator” and you will see how many people use it to feed their kids. And again let’s not talk about Installer 5, Checkra1n, and the bug bounty from Apple…. I was just doing some reverse engineering on iOS 14.5 beta, trying to find some new methods to hook in order to do some magicky magic but you just screwed it all up. Now I am tired, going to sleep. Hope you won’t keep nagging ????????

1 minute ago, GrandPapillon said:

and where is your Github page, fraud? ????

Don’t tell me you can’t find it Mr.NSA. It’s as easy as a Google search. Is that too hard for you? Wow ????????????????

4 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

do you? vhost resolve by name, ever heard of it? oh wait, you weren't born when that happened LOL ????

Every second you make it more apparent, your lack of knowledge I mean. Whatever floats your bot Mr.NSA ???????????????? 

Just now, GrandPapillon said:

it seems that you have only 1 direct A record in your DNS for your website, that's not a proxy like setup that should resolve to proxy

 

have you been lying again? LOL ????

If that was my real IP and not a proxy you should be able to access my website through that IP with the following command: 

curl —header “Host:ctabuyo.com” http://IP…. 
 

Do you even understand how the internet works? ????????‍♂️????????‍♂️????????‍♂️????????‍♂️????????‍♂️

4 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

so you are a Chinese little hack, using some Russian proxy ????

 

like I said, can't even hack with an IP address, this is where the world has come to, frigging millennials can't hack <deleted> ????

I’m Spanish lol ????

you can hack through an IP? Holy cow I seriously don’t understand what you’re doing posting at TVF!!!!! You should be working for FBI CIA and NSA all at the same time ????????????????

1 minute ago, GrandPapillon said:

TV go through the Cloudfare proxy, you silly cow, their server IP address are hidden behind that proxy

 

which doesn't seem to be the case for your Russian websites ????

 

Let me dig a little bit deeper, and let me report back, you silly Russian hack ????

TVF go through the Cloudflare proxy doesn’t mean they have record of all our IPs? ????????????????????

this gets funnier every single moment… how much fun I’m having tonight

2 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

why are you hosted in Russia? Liu Yanpeng?

 

are you also running www.Netex24.net? and CryptoDOGE.biz?

I am not hosted in Russia. You should know that it is just a proxy DNS. Sort of like Cloudflare, but Russian cuz they are better at it. Check them out their name is stormwall 
 

Netex24 and crypto doge? Lol yeah, I own blockchain explorer ????????????‍♂️????????‍♂️

Ains Mr.Hacker, you see a WHOIS report and you have no idea what you’re looking it. Really funny ????????

4 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

 

account suspended by Twitter, hum interesting LOL ????

 

how long before you get banned by Google on SEO and for your analytics tracking ????

I don’t even do SEO. Again if you knew anything about it you would know that my website couldn’t be any worse SEO optimized ???????????????????????? 

every time you press send the comment, you’re making it worse….

4 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

interestingly I am finishing Season 4 of Mr Robot. Did you know that every command he types are real, I can even "tell" which one he is going to type before he does, and I recognize most of the output of the little progs he is running, since I have run myself. FYI, the script writer is a real hacker ????

 

and yes, you can hack someone with a simple IP address, at least the real hackers do, not the fake ones with crapware websites ????

Sure they can. You’ve indeed seen too much Hollywood and live in Dreamland ????????????????

And like I said before, my website feeds a lot of people around the world. Which is way more than you will be ever be able to achieve. And let’s not talk about Installer 5, Checkra1n and the bug bounty I got from Apple in 2018 ????

Nope, you can’t hack someone through their IP. But seeing that it seems as though you can, why don’t you show us how it is done instead of using the child argument that real hackers can? ????

It seriously is ridiculous to go around forums claiming that you can get hacked through your IP. Plain out scaremongering. Because guess what? Even ThaiVisa has the IPs all of us. If it was a vector to get hacked, it wouldn’t be exposed to literally every server you visit. Using your brain sometimes is good! 
 

2 hours ago, GrandPapillon said:

you got my IP now, come to get me and hack me, I can't wait to own your ass ????

How you expect me to hack you through your IP. ????‍♂️

I guess that in itself shows how much you know about computers. You watched Mr.Robot from beginning to end and heard the words IP and saw him typing some stuff into his computer and now you think you can hack someone through their IP. Well you better tell me how that works, because I don't even know that myself!! ????

The only bad thing you could do with an IP, is a Layer 4 (or Layer 3) DDOS Attack to leave the other person without network. But that's pretty pointless in itself, and definitely can't be considered hacking. DDOSing a home IP is what skids do.

Get it straight, in order to hack someone, the victim has to download and open an app into his device, or at the very least open a link which contains (malicious) javascript, or in case the attacker and victim are connected to the same LAN then there are many more choices, etc... But you ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT hack anybody with just their IP. Get it right, so you won't put yourself on display next time.

1 hour ago, ukrules said:

 

I bought some myself and took to time to learn about ECC, the neat way a private key is used to create a signature which can be verified with the associated public key and the way the transactions and unspent transaction outputs work along with the public address encoding, etc, etc. The mining didn't interest me at all but I know how it works - I never did mine any coins.

The crypto primitives used of course were nothing new and at the time it was still 'a little bit' patent encumbered if I remember correctly.

Something clicked and I thought wow that's really clever, so I started buying them, they were cheap at the time - like $12 cheap but this was quite a while ago.

It reminded me of the early days of the web when I first logged on, opened up whatever first generation browser it was and then opened a crappy webpage at some university. It explained that all the flags on the screen were actually hosted in separate universities in the flags country all around the world, that was another 'wow' moment.

 

So two 'wow moments', one for the web and another for Bitcoin, maybe one day there will be a third, perhaps when it hits a couple of hundred thousand dollars ????

 

 

 

The truth is that you would have to be crazy to invest any money which you can't afford to lose into Bitcoin. If all your savings are 30k and you invest all of it into BTC expecting it to become 90k then I guess we could all agree that you're crazy. 

But if you have an extra 30k which you can afford to lose, you may find that actually putting them into BTC perhaps doubles them. That's how a lot of people made huge fortunes and how others lost all they had... 

Blockchain sure had a 'wow-moment' for me too, but rather than private-key / public-key (this is basically RSA, and it has been around long before Blockchain, since the early 80s I believe). So what really surprised me about Blockchain, is the trust thing. The fact that you don't need to have any authority in order to have trust, and that in contrast to authorities the blockchain can never suffer from corruption. Let's say, many people trust their government, but it can be corrupted by powerful/rich people ,etc etc... Blockchain you can fully trust it, nobody can corrupt it, or fake it. So this was really the wow moment for me. And why I myself see so many potential in Blockchain, and myself invested a lot of time into learning this technology from the coding side to be ready for the future. (And as time passes it looks like governments and big corps each day more and more see the potential in it as well)

(PS: Yes I know that blockchain is susceptible to certain attacks such as the 51% attack, which in theory would allow that person to fake things as he wanted in the blockchain. But in real life, those attacks are non-viable as nobody can possibly gather that much computational power as to control 50%+ of a big enough blockchain network).

Just my two cents, and the way I see it 

.

1 hour ago, GrandPapillon said:

not falling for crapware and not buying BTC, I think that's above 99% of the population already ????

Well, I never bought BTC myself. And the rest is just pure jealousy ????

When you are able to make a software which feeds thousands around the world, hmu. Go to Fortune Town (or any iPhone repair shop in the world for that matter) and you'll see them using my "crappyware" and feeding their kids with the money they make out of it.

Anyway no point for me in continuing this nonsensical discussion which leads nowhere. I never adviced anyone to buy BTC, let alone at this point in time. But saying blockchain is nothing, is a whole different thing which clearly means you know nothing yourself. 

Good luck,

59 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

again you are missing the point, what's the purpose of the tech. What problem is it trying to solve? there are 100 ways to do the same things as BLC that are far more efficient. Sure I could make things more complex, creating micro webservices that do nothing but silly <deleted> in a complex way. That's not technology, that's being "redundant" and wasteful.

You are still stuck talking about cryptos, when cryptos and finance are just one of the many and when I say many I mean it applications of blockchain. 

There are literally no alternatives to blockchain. Unless of course what you want is just a "distributed database with similar properties" which would eliminate the many resources which blockchain uses, but, who would trust that? ????

59 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

and that's not your GitHub page btw, just your crappyware website ????

Crappyware that brought food in the table for hundredths of people around the world. Just check YouTube ????

What are your accomplishments in life? 

58 minutes ago, GrandPapillon said:

don't be silly, they test the tech out of curiosity, like they did in 2015, and yet no major project have come out of it. Even Singapore, the hub of financial frauds, have abandoned a lot of those fake "BLC" projects.

 

It's all PoC and toys for now, very quickly CTOs and Product Managers realize that nothing is coming out of this

 

how old is ETH and Smart Contract? any major project on serious Production using them? hell no, it's all speculation on the bitcoin exchanges for fools looking to spice up their 1,000 USD in savings ????

DHL, Maersk and even the Chinese government  are using blockchain applications successfully and reliably. (and these just come to mind, there are many others and many more will follow)

Blockchains applications go beyond cryptocurrencies and finance. Literally anyone can make a scam shtcoin out of blockchain. But that doesn't mean blockchain itself is sht or a scam. 

1 hour ago, GrandPapillon said:

only if you knew who I am LOL ????

 

I hacked the NSA in my sleep, and can still all your bitcoins LOL

Ah yes, and I went to Mars in a spacecraft built by myself, found and alien and took him back to earth with me. 

Dreaming is free, just like you dream you can understand the code behind Blockchain. Why don't you provide some proof to your words and share your Github, so we all see how much you really understand that code ????

I on the other hand, told you my nickname, so you can verify and see and Google by yourself all I've done related to "coding"