Morch

You go on and on about Netanyahu being responsible. Pretty much regardless of what is discussed. Your other go to opinion is that it's Israel's policies that are to blame. Hamas's policies and actions come in distant third.

Gallant is not religious/observant either. That you announce there are only two hyperbole options is, again, your opinion. I have posted a couple of other options above, there are others.

Great, now actually bother to read the link, rather than cerry-pick a convenient bit.

And yet, it's exactly what follows from your many posts. Your thrust is that Netanyahu is the one to blame, followed closely by Israel as a whole. Hamas comes in distant third, if that.

No. This is your claim, your argument. I do not need to make it for you. This is not how it works.

That's your opinion, again. Others could cite other reasons, such as political views, security concerns and whatnot. You? You go for hyperbole as the first option.

You have said you did. Again, that gap between what you imagine and reality.

You did not.

What's offensive is you trying to make Hamas not responsible for the attack.

You have not. And it's not quite the same thing. Again, your opinions are not facts.

Netanyahu is not religious. Or at least, not observant. Caught out many times.

That's from Richard Falk's pet project - so no need to expect anything semi-balanced.

Hence the 'starting' in the headline.

No such record. You're making things up on a regular basis.

No, that's another case of your opinion. Carpet bombing is a thing, not just any kind of bombing.

Your opinions are not evidence.

A whole lot of Gaza is riddled by underground tunnels, infrastructure serving Hamas. It is not a 'war crime' to demolish civilian infrastructure, not in the wholesale manner you pronounce.

Your posts often do the cursory bit about Hamas, but mainly they are focused on Israel's wrongs, real or supposed. Going on about 'war crimes' while clearly not having a clue about this, or how such things are decided is yet another hallmark of your posting. Apparently your own opinions, based on nothing much, are more valuable than facts and reality. It doesn't matter who you were responding to. I'm commenting on your posting style, warped take of reality. That I mention my own comments is because they run counter to your nonsense depictions of anyone not seeing things your way. Your last line embodies what I said above.

You are not posting anything resembling a balanced view. Your posts are certainly one-sided. I routinely provide credible sources, rather than rely on opinion presented as fact, which is your thing. Nowhere did I invoke "their credo is to wipe us out" as a rationale for war crimes. You live in an imaginary reality.

She was 19, and confused, not a pro. For example, I think most of my sister's friends are long past that phase, I know she is.

That's your opinion. Not a fact. I'm aware you have issues differentiating between the two.

Never said it was heinous, just amusing in light of the high horse comments made earlier.

Yes, and? Not sure what your argument is. Poor training, lacking procedure, heat of battle, general confusion - it all amounts to the same thing. Stuff happens.

No, that would be you trolling. It's not one vs. the other. There is no alternative account of what happened in that incident in Gaza. What an ambassador says is by definition propaganda. I notice that in all that you still haven't addressed the original post made, before you hijacked the topic on your 'corruption' nonsense.

Heh.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Husam_Zomlot#Other_work