stevenl

You call his explanation a theory, I call his explanation a wild, wild theory.

To me believing in UFO's is in the same category ar believing the moon landing was fake.

I didn't know people traffickers provide work visa. Good to know. "It's very rare to hear from a victim of modern slavery in person, but one woman who came to the UK on a work visa - and was forced to work gruelling hours as a carer - has told us her story.". The whole story makes clear your suggestions are wrong.

You claimed "For those on Tier2 visas, as mentioned in the OP, it is highly unlikely.". The OP contradicts you.

A pity you missed this. "The number of modern slavery cases reported within the UK care industry has more than doubled in the past year. There were 109 potential victims, exploited for personal or financial gain, between January and March - twice as many as the same period in 2022." "Investigators trying to protect workers from being exploited say the care industry is now a "top priority"." And many more

It seems the facts as reported in the OP are contradicting your opinion.

Nothing comparable to this. Checked out Snickers vs marathon since I never heard of that one. No surprise since Snickers was and still is the global brand name.

Yes, comparable. Lol.

Thanks. Those are new logos, not comparable to a new name. So no comparable examples?

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-crane-removes-twitter-sign-san-francisco-police-2023-7 Lol

Looking forward to your example of a comparable rebrand.

If what has been shown in the house is proof, then Trump really is toast.

Not necessarily. I don't care about Twitter, just don't understand a waste of value like this.

I presume you mean 'haven't'?

Wasn't Brexit supposed to be greatly beneficial to the UK fishing industry? https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jul/22/we-are-at-50-of-the-quota-we-had-boss-of-uks-last-long-range-trawler-rues-squandered-brexit-hopes

Whether or not Ukraine is responsible is immaterial, the news is good. And yes, this is a legitimate target.

While I agree with your sentiment here I also wouldn't be surprised if Trump really believed and still believes the election was stolen from him.

Right, you admit your claim was not true but still stick to it. A true fan boy.

Don't forget that this documyeas presented to the then republican director of the DoJ. Nothing was done with i, I would presume because the claims made could not be verified.

No support whatsoever of your earlier post. You yourself would have realised that if you had posted 3 sentences of your link.

No. There is a lot of hard evidence against Trump, especially the documents case. Against the Bidens not a shred of hard evidence.

Un unverified documents with claims about payments made during the trump administration? Please check the definition of proof. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/20/politics/chuck-grassley-fbi-document/index.html

Lol, even the big crook managed to avoid an orange suit so far. And that story has been going on a lot longer and the evidence seems solid.

The war monger here is Putin.

I think a pac is paying for his legal costs, correct? And while this is happening the donations keep coming in.