stevenl

Please explain the connection between 'it's the truth ' and the rest of your post. Iyop of course.

I was wondering the same. I guess it would depend on how they filled out the application. 'pilot of a submersible going to 4000 meters deep' sounds different from 'manager of a tour company '.

Yes, why the question?

I don't think any estate foots the bill. But it's about more than money. What's the point, except showing off capabilities? Leave them be

They're dead on the seafloor at 4000 meters. Please don't spend any effort and money on this.

So nothing on this topic? No surprise because he is absolutely right

Depends how you want to move forward, in this case how you want to move forward with the China relations.

There may have been safety issues. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/21/us/titan-sub-safety-oceangate-employees/index.html

On what basis do you conclude 'jail time for normal Americans'?

Agreed with all. Still doesn't seem smart to say it out loud, and for sure not diplomatic.

When was the sub supposed to surface BTW? Can it not be a simple communication issue?

No commercial benefits? I think it is one commercial enterprise. The costs of the search and rescue should be on the company offering this trip. After all I'm sure they are insured?

Good there's an independent prosecutor then.

Excellent. Now waiting for Trump's attempts to delay

Excellent. Now waiting for Trump's attempts to delay

It doesn't violate the present ruling which pertains to revealing classified documents/information. I would not be surprised if later on a gag order will be issued though.

Doesn't matter. He doesn't have a legal defense and is not interested. He is fighting this out in the public realm.

A non disclosure order has been issued. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/19/donald-trump-classified-documents-evidence-restrictions