ozimoron

Obviously you care, you're here. It's not about self confidence, it's about civility. You're obviously one of those people who think that people who take offense at your "comments" are snowflakes. It's aggression, plain and simple.

You cited them as evidence in some spurious claim in a way which made no rational argument. Carry on.trolling.

There is a rule about clipping posts. And flaming. You just violated 2 rules in 6 words.

No, they're not, not by a human. The sole useful function of emojis is allow a popular post to be designated by 3 positive emojis. Emojis which don't count in this function should be deep sixed.

Why did you take an interest in Australian Aborigines? What does Australia personally have to do with you?

The anonymity highlights the pointless nature of negative emojis. Only positive emojis should be allowed. If you've got nothing good to say, say nothing. It's a fundamental precept of civil social interaction.

Yes!. They are means to troll or effectively enable posting a sad emoji on a post in a way that makes an offensive statement. Emojis are not typically moderated, they are a weak point.

Isn't he the "talking names and kicking ass" threat guy?

Exactly what should happen in Palestine.

No equivalence and you know it very well. Stop trolling. Make good faith arguments and support them properly. For example, your last post you make effort to support your claim. Nada, in words you might understand.

Is there any evidence that Israel doesn't want the land all to itself?

They're justified if the kids throw molotovs AND they are in reasonable fear of their lives,. They are not justified if the kids throw rocks and fireworks. If they shoot kids for throwing rocks they are nazis.

Obviously you don't understand my question. If you would not send your kids out to get shot for publicity but insist that Palestinians would, that's a racist as it gets.;

Would you send your kids out to get shot for some publicity?

That is a disgustingly racist accusation.

Not against children, they're not. You have a problem with grasping this fundamental precept of human rights and decency

Are the illegal Israeli settlements genocide or not? This is the point I made when I said Israel is a nazi state. Apart from shooting kids which you have made clear is justified in your opinion, it is the only criterion I used to judge Israel as being a nazi state. You have consistently dodged this question like kryptonite and now you are again attempting to deflect and to suggest there might be other reasons I think Israel is a nazi state. There aren't. This is the only reason. Since you won't answer that question with a direct answer I guess my point stands. edit: Nor did I use the word racist at any time.

If it's another country then why don't the Israelis act like it and get the hell out of Palestine?

Sure, We get it. Palestinians don't value their kids lives so they send them out to get shot just to bait the Israeli soldiers. The kind of people who believe that are racists.

How are illegal Israeli settlements not genocide? Do you want to defend that proposition?

I think this thread is precisely about Israel's crimes. What motivated Abbas to go off the reservation?

What you are suggesting is that because oil still has uses, removing 99% of the problem is pointless.

I think plastic needs to be banned for most cases anyway. The amount of plastic produced should be minimal and virtually absent for home consumer use.

Rats aren't stupid. They know when to jump ship. The unhinged Trump memo is starting to sink in.

Nobody on the planet has said to stop using oil. Just to stop burning it.