Jump to content

jerrymahoney

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    7,245
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jerrymahoney

  1. From the Justia link above:

    "Given the complexities surrounding employment and immigration law, you might find it beneficial to consult with an attorney. They can offer guidance specific to your situation and help ensure that your business remains in compliance with federal and state laws."

    So it isn't always cut & dry.

    • Haha 1
  2. That's a micro issue -- this is more macro esp. as regards those hating 3 CIT judges referenced above:

    -- Still, Mr. Trump’s tirade has strained an already uneasy relationship with traditional legal conservatives.

    -- Many share the president’s goals of strengthening border security, curbing the administrative state and ending “diversity, equity and inclusion” programs, said John Yoo, a conservative law professor. But, he added, they dislike some of Mr. Trump’s methods, whether that is prolifically invoking emergency powers or insulting judges who rule against his administration.
  3. 22 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

    I think this one is real funny I mean what reason could a judge have to disagree with Trump other than that he/she HATES TRUMP!

     

    Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of “TRUMP?” What other reason could it be? 

     

    https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114593880455063168

    I posted this above. The 3 judges that Trump says must hate him ruled on the CIT case V.O.S. tariff case. The legal group behind the plaintiffs case is the Liberty Justice Center. One of the prime backers of LJC is Richard Uihlein. This Richard Uihlein as in the #2 donor to Trump 2024.

     

    image.png.dff573c2a546e46ebc8edb2f3859b61f.png

     

    from the above WaPo:

     

    The (Uihlein) couple founded Uline, a Wisconsin-based shipping and packaging materials company. They give to causes outside the GOP’s mainstream, helping to push the party further to the right.

     

     

     

     

     

  4. 18 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

    So, it started as a joke. Too bad the left has not sense of humor.

     ICE Officers are herewith ordered, by notice of this TRUTH, to do all in their power to achieve the very important goal of delivering the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History.

     

    https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114690267066155731

     

    So this must be a joke again from from Trump just top send the left wingers into a tizzy. He'll say tomorrow he really didn't mean it. Just people don't appreciate his sense of humor.

  5. 21 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

    NYTimes headline 02JUN2025:

     

    A Fiery Brief Fueled by Conservatives Helped Put Trump’s Tariffs in Peril
    A coalition including leading figures on the right said the president’s program did violence to the Constitution. One judge cited it eight times.

    Folks on here want to go after the LIB-tards when the folks to really watch out for are the LIB-eratarians

  6. I think this one is real funny I mean what reason could a judge have to disagree with Trump other than that he/she HATES TRUMP!

     

    Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of “TRUMP?” What other reason could it be? 

     

    https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114593880455063168

    • Thanks 1
  7. On 6/14/2025 at 5:34 PM, impulse said:

    No.  He just underestimated the depths to which the Dems, MSM and activist judges would sink. 

     

    They'll be perfectly happy to destroy the country as long as it stops him.

     

    NYTimes headline 02JUN2025:

     

    A Fiery Brief Fueled by Conservatives Helped Put Trump’s Tariffs in Peril
    A coalition including leading figures on the right said the president’s program did violence to the Constitution. One judge cited it eight times.

  8. This from the ABC report:

     

    "The folks that were escorting me in the building walked me over. I didn't even open the door. The door was opened for me. And I spent a few minutes in the back of the room just listening in until the rhetoric, the political rhetoric got to be too much to take. So, I spoke up," he later added.


    During her news conference, Noem claimed she was going to "liberate" Los Angeles "from the socialists and the burdensome leadership this governor and mayor have placed on this country and this city."

     

    Padilla told MSNBC that he felt he needed to speak out, said he introduced himself and started asking a question before the officers pushed him out of the room as news cameras, reporters and onlookers recorded the incident.

     

    After he was quickly released, he and Noem had a private conversation for "10-15 minutes" after the incident, according to both the senator and the secretary.

    Noem said that Padilla will likely not be charged.

     

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/padilla-pushes-back-noems-claim-barged-news-conference/story?id=122817212

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...