ASEAN NOW News

Canadian police have identified the suspect behind a mass shooting that left eight dead and several wounded in northeast British Columbia. The tragedy unfolded at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School and a local home, with the suspect, an 18-year-old local resident, found dead from a self-inflicted injury. Investigations into the motive are ongoing. Get the latest headlines in your email Six victims were tragically killed at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School, marking the deadliest school shooting in Canada in decades. Among the victims were several students and a teacher. Two additional victims, identified as the suspect’s relatives, were discovered at a residence in the small town of 2,400 people. Authorities initially reported a higher death toll but later confirmed one injured victim survived. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney conveyed his condolences to the Tumbler Ridge community, stating, "the nation mourns with you." Mass shootings are notably rare in Canada, which enforces stricter gun control laws compared to the US. As the investigation progresses, the focus remains on understanding the reasons behind this devastating event and providing support to those affected in the tight-knit community. Authorities continue to gather information and urge anyone with insights into the suspect’s background or possible motive to come forward. The incident has reignited discussions on gun control and the need for comprehensive measures to prevent such tragedies. As Canada grapples with the shock of this event, the authorities emphasize the importance of community resilience and unity in healing and moving forward. Key Takeaways: An 18-year-old suspect identified in Canada's deadliest school shooting in decades. Eight victims, including students, a teacher, and relatives, confirmed. Prime Minister Carney extends national condolences and solidarity. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 12 Feb 2026 View full article

British Woman's Death in Texas Linked to Trump ArgumentLucy Harrison, a 23-year-old British woman from Warrington, Cheshire, was shot dead by her father while visiting him in Texas. An inquest revealed that the father-daughter duo had argued about then-President Donald Trump earlier that day. The incident occurred in Prosper, near Dallas, on 10 January 2025. Get the latest headlines in your email Harrison’s father, Kris Harrison, had moved to the US when Lucy was a child. Despite the police investigating her death as possible manslaughter, no criminal charges were brought against Kris after a grand jury in Collin County decided not to indict him. At the Cheshire Coroner's Court inquest, Lucy’s boyfriend, Sam Littler, provided insights into the "big argument" they had about Trump. Lucy often became upset about her father's gun ownership and previous alcohol issues, which came to a head during their visit. Kris Harrison admitted in a statement that he relapsed on the day of the shooting, consuming around 500ml of white wine. On that fateful morning, Lucy questioned her father’s reaction if she were a victim of sexual assault, to which he responded indifferently, upsetting her further. Before they were due to leave for the airport, Kris took Lucy to his bedroom to show her a Glock 9mm handgun he kept for "security." According to Kris, the gun accidentally discharged as he lifted it, striking Lucy fatally. He claimed he couldn't remember if his finger was on the trigger. Luciana Escalera, a police officer, noted the smell of alcohol on Kris’s breath after the shooting, and CCTV footage confirmed his purchase of wine earlier that day. Kris’s attorney, Ana Samuel, argued for the coroner to recuse herself due to alleged bias, but the request was denied. Lucy’s mother, Jane Coates, described her daughter as a "force of life," passionate about important issues and debates. The inquest has been adjourned, with the coroner’s conclusions expected shortly. Lucy’s tragic death has highlighted the emotional and complex family dynamics surrounding gun ownership and political disagreements. Key Takeaways: Lucy Harrison was fatally shot by her father after a political dispute. The accident involved Kris showing Lucy his handgun, which discharged. No criminal charges were filed as a grand jury declined to indict. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 11 Feb 2026 View full article

BREAKING STORY ! SummaryAt least seven people have been killed in a shooting at a school in British Columbia, Canada, police say Six people were found dead inside Tumbler Ridge Secondary School, while a seventh died on the way to hospital An individual believed to be the shooter was also found deceased with what appears to be a self‑inflicted injury, according to officials Another two people were found dead at a separate location, which police believe was connected to the incident 'The scene was very dramatic', police chief says RCMP Chief Supt Ken Floyd says it is too early to say whether the death toll will rise. The roughly 25 people who suffered non-life-threatening injuries are still being assessed by medical professionals, he says. "The scene was very dramatic and there were multiple victims that are still being cared for," he says. developing story Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 11 Feb 2026 View full article

Norwegian Defence Chief Highlights Potential Russian ThreatsGeneral Eirik Kristoffersen, Norway's chief of defence, has issued a stark warning about the possibility of a Russian invasion aimed at protecting nuclear assets in the far north. While Russia does not show conquest ambitions akin to those in Ukraine, its nuclear arsenal on the Kola Peninsula, near the Norwegian border, presents a strategic vulnerability. Kristoffersen outlined the importance of these nuclear resources, suggesting their protection could lead to aggressive actions by Moscow. "We don’t take that off the table," he stated, referencing scenarios where Russia might act to safeguard its second-strike capabilities. This highlights the broader strategic calculations that shape tensions in the region. In a comprehensive interview with the Guardian, Kristoffersen also criticized remarks made by former U.S. President Donald Trump concerning Greenland. He dismissed Trump’s assertions about allied roles in Afghanistan and emphasized Norway's significant contributions, including frontline missions and substantial sacrifices. The geopolitical landscape has shifted significantly, especially with Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Norway has responded by bolstering its defenses and strengthening alliances with Sweden and Finland, who have joined NATO. Kristoffersen stressed the dual nature of the threats, combining traditional military risks with modern hybrid tactics. Despite these challenges, Norway maintains open lines of communication with Russia, particularly regarding search and rescue missions in the Barents Sea. Kristoffersen has advocated for a military hotline between the nations to avoid accidental escalations, noting that recent airspace violations were likely due to pilot inexperience rather than intentional aggression. Regarding the Svalbard archipelago, Kristoffersen confirmed Norway's adherence to the 1920 treaty prohibiting its militarization. He dismissed Russian accusations of stealth militarisation as unfounded, asserting that Moscow does not genuinely believe in these claims, but uses them for propaganda purposes. Addressing Trump’s broader comments on Greenland, Kristoffersen found the claims of military designs by China and Russia "very strange." He reinforced that Norway’s intelligence services have a comprehensive view of Arctic activities, focusing on traditional Russian operations rather than new threats in Greenland. French President Emmanuel Macron has added to the dialogue, urging European nations to stand firm against intimidation and strategic pressures. Macron described a "Greenland moment," warning that perceived threats could lead to increased dependency without proper resistance. Kristoffersen’s insights underline the complexities involved in maintaining Arctic security, particularly given the growing geopolitical tensions. By advocating for preparedness, strong alliances, and channels of communication, Norway seeks to manage these challenges while preventing unnecessary escalations. As the Arctic continues to be a focal point of strategic interest, the role of nations like Norway, with its balanced approach of resilience and diplomacy, becomes crucial. The broader international community watches closely, recognizing that developments in this region have significant implications for global stability. Key Takeaways: Norway warns of potential Russian moves to protect nuclear assets. Emphasis on strong NATO alliances and Arctic security preparedness. Open communication with Russia crucial in managing tensions. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10 View full article

Farage Warns of Islamist Influence in UK InstitutionsNigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, has raised concerns about Islamist influence within British society, claiming that Islamists are "embedded" in the nation's education, politics, and police. He delivered this warning during the launch of his party's Jewish Alliance. Farage stated that senior intelligence sources informed him about the deep infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood, a Sunni Islamist organization, into various UK structures. Emphasizing the education system, political sphere, and police force, he noted the spreading influence as a significant threat to national stability. Highlighting "rife and rampant sectarianism," Farage criticized the lack of action against the Brotherhood, contrasting it with certain Arab countries that have banned the group, designating it a terrorist organization. Farage believes this inaction mirrors a broader reluctance to confront security challenges. His concerns resonate with recent US actions, where the government moved to potentially designate parts of the Muslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist organizations. US officials cited the Brotherhood's engagement in violence and destabilization across the Middle East, noting threats to American and allied interests. The US highlighted specific incidents, such as the Brotherhood's involvement in attacks following the events of October 7, 2023, in Israel. According to officials, chapters in Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt have aligned with militant groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, escalating regional tensions. Farage's warnings at the Jewish Alliance event were echoed by international concerns regarding the Brotherhood's activities. He pointed out the urgency of addressing embedded threats to protect national security. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has acknowledged the potential threat, stating to Jewish News that the Government is keeping the Muslim Brotherhood under "very close review." This statement indicates a level of governmental awareness and monitoring of the organization's influence within the UK. Farage's remarks aim to spotlight the importance of proactive measures to safeguard British institutions from foreign influence. By invoking international examples, he underscores the need for vigilance and decisive action. Key Takeaways: Farage claims Islamists are embedded in UK institutions. Aligns with US scrutiny of the Muslim Brotherhood. UK Government monitoring the Brotherhood's influence. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10 View full article

Farage Warns of Gated Future for British JewsNigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, has issued a warning that British Jews may soon need to live in "gated communities." At his party's Jewish Alliance launch, Farage shared his observations from Strasbourg during his MEP tenure, where Jewish communities faced significant security threats. Farage recounted passing a Jewish school in Strasbourg where children, aged four or five, were escorted by armed soldiers. He highlighted similar situations in Brussels, noting that successful Jewish residents often reside in gated communities with 24-hour security. "I'm afraid, on the current path, that is the future for the British Jewish community," Farage stated, underscoring his concerns for their safety. While Farage insisted he is not advocating for "special rights," he emphasized the urgent need for increased protection due to "a direct threat" against British Jews. His remarks highlighted a trend he's observed, urging action to prevent similar circumstances in the UK. Robert Jenrick also addressed the event, condemning "hate marches" by pro-Palestine protesters as assaults on national unity. His comments aligned with Farage's, promoting a vision of a cohesive, multi-faith, and multi-ethnic Britain. Despite facing criticism for previous comments about multiculturalism in Birmingham, Jenrick reiterated the importance of tackling antisemitism and ensuring Jewish security. He stressed that the Reform UK party is committed to safeguarding all communities under "one flag." The event featured speeches from notable figures including Suella Braverman and Richard Tice, who joined in expressing firm support for protecting Jewish life in the UK. Attendees described the launch as a powerful gathering focused on confronting sectarianism and promoting safety for all. The party's stance reflects a broader effort to address and combat antisemitic threats while fostering an integrated society. Farage's call to action highlights the need for vigilance and proactive measures to ensure the safety and integration of Jewish communities across the UK. Key Takeaways: Nigel Farage warns of potential security challenges for British Jews. Robert Jenrick emphasizes unity in facing antisemitic threats. Reform UK reinforces the need to protect Jewish communities. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10 View full article

Worldwide abuse case spans decades and multiple countries.Jacques Leveugle, a 79-year-old former French teacher, has been charged with the rape and sexual assault of 89 teenagers, with allegations dating back to the 1960s. The charges emerged after his nephew discovered a USB drive containing detailed accounts of his offences. The Grenoble prosecutor, Etienne Manteaux, revealed the disturbing breadth of the case, with crimes allegedly committed across France, Germany, Switzerland, Morocco, Niger, Algeria, the Philippines, India, Colombia, and New Caledonia. Leveugle allegedly used his position as an informal teacher at holiday camps to perpetrate these crimes. Authorities made the rare decision to name Leveugle publicly, hoping unknown victims will come forward, as only about 40 have been identified so far. “If victims wish to come forward, now is the time,” urged Manteaux. Leveugle was arrested in 2024, while residing in Morocco. His arrest followed his nephew's discovery of incriminating material on the USB, which allegedly contained extensive documentation of his sexual relations with minors. The timeline of Leveugle’s movements, dating back to 1967, shows a pattern of travel and alleged abuse in multiple countries. He reportedly exploited his role as a tutor to engage with young people, leading to the charges he now faces. Shockingly, Leveugle also confessed to killing his mother and aunt, claiming he smothered them with cushions during their terminal illnesses in 1974 and 1992. A separate investigation has been launched into these alleged murders. Despite the statute of limitations covering alleged assaults before 1993, Manteaux stressed the importance of understanding the extent of Leveugle's actions. The detailed records found could be key in piecing together the full scope of his crimes. This case draws parallels to other high-profile cases in France, where meticulous records kept by offenders have been instrumental in securing convictions. Such documentation has previously led to 20-year sentences in cases like those of Dominique Pélicot and former doctor Joêl Le Scouarnec. As the investigation continues, French authorities are determined to ensure justice is served, highlighting the significance of evidence in prosecuting historical abuse cases. Key Takeaways: Jacques Leveugle charged with abuse across decades and countries. Authorities name suspect to encourage more victims to come forward. Separate investigation into Leveugle's alleged familial murders. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10 View full article

Indonesia leads international effort to stabilize Gaza.Indonesia is gearing up to deploy up to 8,000 soldiers to Gaza as part of the second phase of a US-brokered ceasefire agreement. This marks Indonesia as the first country to commit troops to the International Stabilization Force (ISF). General Maruli Simanjuntak, the army chief of staff, announced that training is underway, focusing on medical and engineering roles. This initiative is mandated by the UN Security Council to secure borders and demilitarize the area, including the disarmament of Hamas. Indonesia's move follows its commitment to President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace, which aims to oversee post-war reconstruction and a new Palestinian government in Gaza. The board will meet for the first time in Washington on 19 February. President Prabowo Subianto's decision has sparked criticism from some Islamic groups in Indonesia, amidst public backlash over US involvement in Gaza’s conflict. However, Prabowo stands firm, emphasizing Indonesia’s role as the world’s largest Muslim nation in pursuing a two-state solution. Israel’s public broadcaster reported that an area between Rafah and Khan Younis in Gaza has been designated for an Indonesian military base. Although Turkey and Pakistan are considering similar moves, they have stressed their deployments would be strictly for peacekeeping, not disarming Hamas. Despite these efforts, tensions remain high as Hamas refuses to disarm while Israel occupies parts of Gaza. This complicates the mission, as the situation on the ground is far from a stable peace. Key Takeaways: Indonesia to deploy troops under a US-brokered ceasefire agreement. Tasks include securing borders and post-war reconstruction. Regional tensions persist, impacting peacekeeping efforts. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10 View full article

Ahmad Mulakhil found guilty; case prompts calls for policy change.Ahmad Mulakhil, a 23-year-old Afghan asylum seeker, has been convicted at Warwick Crown Court for the horrific rape and abduction of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. The shocking incident occurred on 22 July, when Mulakhil took the girl to a secluded area and committed brutal sexual offences, while also recording an indecent video of her. During the trial, the victim bravely recounted her terrifying ordeal, explaining that Mulakhil laughed during the attack and ignored her pleas to stop. Prosecutor Daniel Oscroft condemned Mulakhil's attempts to shift blame onto the victim as "stomach-churning." The conviction has sparked widespread public outrage, with protests erupting due to the initial lack of information on Mulakhil's nationality and immigration status. This has led to changes in guidance for reporting such details in high-profile cases. Mulakhil, who arrived in the UK from France in March 2025, four months before the attack, now faces a substantial custodial sentence and deportation. His case has drawn criticism from political figures like Nigel Farage, who accused authorities of a "cover-up." Warwickshire Police initially followed national guidelines that excluded sharing suspects’ ethnicity or immigration status. However, after public pressure, police forces have been encouraged to disclose such details in similar cases. Mulakhil's co-defendant, Mohammad Kabir, was acquitted of charges related to the incident, including attempted child abduction. Following his acquittal, Kabir was released from custody. The case has amplified debates over immigration policies. A Home Office spokesperson stated that efforts are underway to reform laws to prevent foreign criminals from exploiting UK laws, emphasizing new measures to tackle illegal migration. The victim, praised for her courage, will carry the trauma of this crime for the rest of her life. Authorities continue to support and liaise with the Nuneaton community, acknowledging the deep impact this crime has had on local residents. Key Takeaways: Ahmad Mulakhil convicted for rape and abduction in Nuneaton. Public outcry leads to changes in reporting suspect details. Authorities focus on reforming immigration laws. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10 View full article

Starmer navigates turbulent political waters, securing temporary stability.Monday was a tumultuous day for Sir Keir Starmer as Prime Minister. Facing calls for resignation, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar almost delivered a decisive blow to his leadership. Yet, in a strategic comeback, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy and other cabinet members swiftly rallied behind Starmer, showcasing a united front. The dramatic events unfolded in a day filled with speculation and intrigue. Many believed Starmer might not survive the crisis, with even some Downing Street officials doubting his ability to continue. As tension escalated, Sarwar was poised in Glasgow, prepared to publicly call for Starmer’s resignation. However, Lammy's timely support, followed by a cascade of endorsements from ministers and MPs, shifted the tide. For now, Starmer retains his position, but the stability of his leadership hangs in the balance. Future challenges loom large, with the May elections on the horizon and the critical Gorton and Denton by-election. These events could become defining moments for Starmer’s tenure, testing his political resilience and party loyalty. The shadow of Wes Streeting, Health Secretary, and perceived leadership hopeful, looms over the political landscape. Streeting’s release of communications with Lord Mandelson without parliamentary approval fueled speculation about his ambitions, straining relations within the cabinet. Streeting maintains his support for Starmer, yet his actions hint at underlying tensions and potential rivalries. Other potential leadership contenders in the Labour ranks include Angela Rayner, Shabana Mahmood, John Healey, and Ed Miliband. Despite murmurs of their candidacies, none seem ready to directly challenge Starmer’s authority at present. The recent resignations within Starmer’s inner circle, including Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney, have added to the uncertainty. The departure of key figures weakens Starmer's team, making forthcoming appointments crucial for his leadership. Decisions about new staff could be pivotal, potentially redefining the direction and structure of his administration. Starmer is also under increasing pressure to adapt his political agenda. Calls for a bolder, more left-wing approach are growing louder, reflecting dissatisfaction among some Labour MPs. His recent victories within the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP), while significant, could be tested by future policy decisions and reforms, such as those related to the SEND system. His ability to balance the diverse factions within his party while delivering on policy promises will be critical. The scepticism from some MPs suggests that any faltering in these efforts could reignite leadership debates. As Starmer navigates these complexities, his focus remains on addressing key national issues and maintaining Labour's momentum. His speech at the PLP meeting emphasized his commitment to fight for the country he loves and to oppose the agendas posed by rival factions. In conclusion, while Keir Starmer has weathered this immediate storm, the road ahead is fraught with challenges. Vigilant of internal and external pressures, his leadership will continually be tested. How he maneuvers through these turbulent waters will define not only his future but also the trajectory of the Labour Party in the approaching months. Key Takeaways: Starmer solidifies position with cabinet support amidst crisis. Streeting's actions stir speculation about leadership ambitions. Upcoming elections and policy challenges may impact stability. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10 View full article

Trump's Alleged Call About Epstein Surfaces in FBI FilesExplosive allegations have emerged from an FBI document detailing a call between Donald Trump and a former Florida police chief in 2006. The now-president reportedly told the chief, "everyone knows" about Jeffrey Epstein's actions, praising the police for investigating Epstein. The unnamed police chief, believed to be Michael Reiter, claimed Trump informed him he had expelled Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, citing his "disgusting" reputation. He also alleged Trump labelled Ghislaine Maxwell as Epstein's "operative," warning to "focus on her." These revelations may challenge Trump's longstanding denial of knowledge regarding Epstein’s crimes. In 2019, Trump claimed ignorance of Epstein’s misconduct, stating, "No, I had no idea." While the Palm Beach police began probing Epstein for exploiting underage girls in 2006, the case was later handed to federal prosecutors. A controversial plea deal in 2008 shielded Epstein from severe charges. According to the FBI, Trump reportedly distanced himself from Epstein upon seeing him with teenagers, saying he "got the hell out of there." Reiter asserted Trump was an early informant to police about Epstein. However, Trump has maintained he severed ties with Epstein years before the arrest due to employment disputes. "He was fine, and then not too long after that, he did it again and I said 'outta here'," Trump stated about Epstein allegedly attempting to recruit Mar-a-Lago staff. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged the alleged call, aligning with Trump's narrative that he expelled Epstein for inappropriate behaviour. Amidst the resurfacing of these allegations, Maxwell recently refused to testify before Congress about Epstein, invoking the Fifth Amendment. Her lawyer stated that Maxwell would "speak fully" if given clemency by Trump—a prospect Trump has denied considering. The Justice Department has said there's no corroborating evidence of Trump's reported call, keeping the speculation alive about what the president knew and when. Key Takeaways: Trump allegedly called to alert police about Epstein in 2006. FBI document raises questions about Trump's Epstein knowledge. Maxwell remains silent, offering to speak if granted clemency. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10 View full article

Ghislaine Maxwell's refusal to testify before Congress draws backlash.Ghislaine Maxwell chose silence over answers during a closed-door congressional deposition, invoking her Fifth Amendment right. This move has drawn sharp criticism, with Democratic Representative Robert Garcia questioning, “Who is she protecting?” Garcia, part of the oversight committee pushing to release Jeffrey Epstein’s investigative files, slammed Maxwell for providing no information about Epstein's network. He accused the Trump administration of giving her special treatment in a low-security prison, alleging a White House cover-up. Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement with Epstein, was advised by her attorney David Oscar Markus to remain silent. Markus stated that Maxwell's current habeas petition demonstrates her conviction was based on an unfair trial, hence her decision to invoke the Fifth. According to Markus, Maxwell is willing to reveal everything if granted clemency by President Trump. "Only she can provide the complete account," he insisted, suggesting that both Trump and Clinton are innocent of any wrongdoing related to Epstein. The White House, approached for comment, reiterated previous statements that pardoning Maxwell was not under consideration. Ro Khanna, another Democratic representative, pointed out inconsistencies in Maxwell’s stance. Previously, she willingly engaged in an interview with Trump’s Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche without invoking her rights. Maxwell answered all questions without hesitation during that meeting, said her lawyer. This shift from openness to silence raises questions about her motivations and potential protections. Khanna had prepared pointed questions for Maxwell, seeking clarity on co-conspirators and secret settlements she once acknowledged. The Department of Justice claims no list of names exists, despite suspicions fueled by released documents and legal claims. Maxwell’s silence has intensified demands for transparency amid ongoing investigations. As her lawyer suggests the truth could emerge with clemency, the political and legal drama surrounding Epstein's network continues unabated. Key Takeaways: Maxwell refused to testify, invoking her Fifth Amendment rights. Her silence spurred allegations of a cover-up and raised questions. Calls for transparency in Epstein's investigation intensify. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.09 View full article