-
Posts
2,059 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Doctor Tom
-
-
I travelled from Thailand to UK with my Grandchild, different name. I carried with me a Permission Letter, signed by both his parents and witnessed by a Lawyer and duly stamped. I was asked for it at UK Immigration, so it was a good move. No issues on the return flight
-
53 minutes ago, Jumbo1968 said:
i have been trying to see/contact my doctor but you can’t call him nor speak with his secretary, everything is by email. He has already recommended 2 neither of which are available, I have a consultation on Thursday to discuss an alternative medication.
Bit confused at this. If it's an International Hospital Consultant you are dealing with, I find it incomprehensible that the hospital cannot supply what you need. They have processes to import meds that are maybe rare here, not unavailable locally, or generally in Thailand. Why do they offer you an alternative instead of sourcing the one you actually need? I know that is the case for Bangkok Hospital Pattaya, for, example, cancer drugs, so I don't know why you are having such an issue. I hope that you can sort it out quickly, as reliable and regular meds for your condition are vital if you are to arrest the condition. Good luck on Thursday
-
3 hours ago, lopburi3 said:
Unless you are talking about a country other than Thailand that has not been my experience - if it is in stock and not a controlled drug they will sell it. If you go with an explained condition they will likely advise you to use what other customers are using. In fact many pharmacies do not even have a pharmacist working.
Like many Vets, many rural so called 'doctors' and many 'dentists', too many of them are barely trained and often not fully qualified. Check the certificates displayed on the walls. Often they are merely 'Attendance' at courses, not formal degree qualifications.
-
3 hours ago, Jumbo1968 said:
In general Pharmacists just won’t sell you anything and everything just by telling them your symptoms, if they think you have a serious condition they will advise you to consult a doctor.
In Thailand, you can always, but always, find a pharmacist who will sell you prescription meds over the counter, without a prescription. It has always been thus here.
-
13 hours ago, connda said:
I really doubt anyone takes glaucoma meds unless they are diagnosed with glaucoma. Why would anyone want to buy a ฿600+ THB bottle of drops just for the heck of it. Unless you are already going blind, most people don't know they have it unless they are tested. I wasn't diagnosed until this year during a regular examination.You would be surprised at what meds people take here without ever being properly diagnosed with a condition by a Specialist Consultant. Self medication is rife here, hence so many people using a forum to ask questions about possible medical conditions that clearly need investigation by a doctor, in hospital. I don't know if it's some twisted thinking to avoid medical bills, or some people just being as dumb as a brick, but it happens a lot.
-
I come to this post a bit late. Firstly, I wouldn't take any eye drop medication unless I had competed a comprehensive examination investigation by a Specialist on what the issue is and how it may progress and submit to regular 12 monthly checks. I did just that and I now take Xalatin each day, which is readily available from a local Pharmacy who now stock it after my request. I do not have Glaucoma, but it is in my immediate family and the Xalatin is there to regulate the pressure in the eye, which was on the high side, so that I don't develop the condition. I will now take the `drops for the rest of my days. However, It was pointed out to me by the Specialist that it can have side effects if not used, stored and handled correctly.
-
30 minutes ago, KannikaP said:
To which 'stupid idea' are you referring please?
Are you trying to tell us all that unless you read a Thailand forum, that is the only way you can find out that you have to register for tax? Where is that is the visa rules, or the immigration rules? I'll tell you, nowhere. I use an argent for my extensions, she has told me nothing of this idea, because it doesn't concern me, or many thousand of other expats. If you run a business here, or are a Thai resident working overseas and remitting back to here, then you are liable; maybe.
- 1
- 1
-
7 minutes ago, Mike Lister said:
A tax resident is ANYONE who remains here for more than 180 days per calendar year, I suggest that most expat retirees here are tax resident.
well good luck with that stupid idea for retired expats. It will never happen
-
1 hour ago, KannikaP said:
From Mike Lister's Simple Tax Guide
10. Because you are Tax Resident, YOU must review your inbound overseas Funds Transfers each year to determine if they represent income assessable to tax in Thailand, nobody else will do this for you. Our current interpretation of the RD rules suggest that if your assessable income does not exceed 120,000 baht per year, you do not need to file a tax return (60,000 baht if your only assessable income is bank interest paid to you by a bank in Thailand). If your assessable income is over 120,000 baht per year, you must file a Thai tax return between 1 January and 31 March.
Because you are Tax Resident,
Most if not all retired expats, remitting living expenses to Thailand, are not tax residents.
- 1
-
On 1/22/2024 at 3:43 PM, KannikaP said:
Anyone receiving/transferring in more than Bht 120,000 in a year (ie Bht 10,000 per month) SHOULD get a TIN and file a return.
Utter nonsense
-
2 hours ago, Gweiloman said:
The UN should be interested in acts of international sabotage such as Nord Stream but they are not investigating. I wonder why. Occam’s razor obviously.
The UN is interested in nothing but its own propaganda, and its use as a nice holiday destination for its Members/Representatives.
- 2
- 2
-
1 minute ago, Gweiloman said:
Ok, so NK is sending arms to Russia. So what? The UN is a paper tiger. No nation seems to abide by or care about any UN Security Council resolutions.What can the UN do? Impose sanctions? Lol.
Exactly
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, retarius said:Russia should send pictures of US arms shipments to Ukraine.
Why? They are not being hidden
- 1
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I have a Toyota Vios. It is 7 years old and is in perfect working order after 130,000 kms. it was 680K new and its still under 800K new today. I love this little car and I will definitely replace it with same, or a Yaris, both are under 800K. I am not convinced on the MGs. They may look good, but will they last and have the reliability of a Toyota. In any event, out of principle, I would not buy a Chinese made car.
- 1
- 3
- 1
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 12/14/2023 at 3:08 PM, Gecko123 said:A closer reading of the CRUELTY PREVENTION AND WELFARE OF ANIMAL ACT, B.E. 2557 (2014) does seem to indicate that killing a pet which is not suffering may indeed be against the law, whether performed by a vet or at home.
Because the English language translation of paragraph (4) was somewhat ambiguous, I looked at the Thai language text, which reads "การฆ่าสัตว์ในกรณีท่ีสัตวแพทย์เห็นว่าสัตว์ป่วย พิการ หรือบาดเจบ็และไมส่ามารถเยยีวยาหรอื รกัษใหม้ชีวีติ อยรู่ อดไดโ้ ดยปราศจากความทกุข์ทรมาน." This translates to "in the case where a veterinarian deems an animal so ill, disabled, or injured that no medical treatment or procedure can be performed which will allow the animal to continue to live without suffering. Note that ความทกุข์ทรมาน does not translate to "insufferable pain"(as translated below) which would suggest that the animal has to be in absolute agony before it can be legally euthanized. Rather, ความทกุข์ทรมาน simply translates to "suffering", "pain" or "distress." So a more accurate translation than the below translation of paragraph (4) might well be: "killing animals in cases where the veterinarian sees that the animal is sick, disabled, or injured and a vet is unable to provide treatment or treatment to sustain its life without suffering."
While it would obviously be easier to have a pet euthanized at a vet, in cases where an injured or ill animal does meet this criteria, the Cruelty Prevention and Welfare Prevention act does not appear to specify that a veterinarian necessarily has to perform the euthanasia, or that it is illegal to perform it at the owner's residence.
CRUELTY PREVENTION AND WELFARE OF ANIMAL ACT, B.E. 2557 (2014):
Section 20. No person shall perform any act which is deemed an act of cruelty to animal without justification.
Section 21. The following shall not be deemed cruelty to animal under section 20:
(1) killing an animal for food, this shall apply only to animals used as food;
(2) killing an animal under the law on animal killing control and meat vending;
(3) killing an animal to control animal contagious diseases under the law on animal contagious diseases;
(4) killing an animal in the case where a veterinarian considers an animal ill, disabled, or injured and cannot be treated or restored to survive without insufferable pain; (Note: "insufferable pain" may overstate intent of wording in original Thai language text - see above)
(5) killing an animal in accordance with a religious ritual or belief;
(6) killing animal in the case where there is a necessity to prevent danger to life or body of a human or other animal, or to prevent damage to property;
(7) any act to the body of an animal which is deemed a veterinary practice by a veterinarian by profession or a person who is exempt from registering, and being granted a veterinary license from the veterinary council as per the law on veterinary profession;
(8) cutting an ear, the tail, fur, horn, or tusk with reasonable justification and is harmless to an animal or the live of an animal;
(9) local traditional animal fight;
(10) any other act which is specifically permitted by the law;
(11) any other act which is prescribed by the Minister by Notification with the approval of the committee.
CRUELTY PREVENTION AND WELFARE OF ANIMAL ACT, B.E. 2557 (2014):
English: https://dld.go.th/th/images/stories/law/english/en_cruelty_prevention_act2014.pdf
Thai: https://pvlo-lpn.dld.go.th/webnew/images/stories/prakad/2561/cruelty.pdf
As I say in a post above, just a load of BS.
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 12/11/2023 at 11:23 AM, Moonlover said:It's actually a cultural thing that makes vets very reluctant to carry out your wishes
Culture be damned. They are f-ing cowards, hiding behind some cultural BS when their clear duty is to ease the suffering of animals. They are all useless and a f-ing disgrace. My dogs are still young but I dread the day when we need to take such a decision. I'm so sorry.
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, advancebooking said:Recently I was nearly killed walking fast across a zebra crossing.
Take note; there are no pedestrian crossings in Thailand. They may be marked as such, some even have lights, but they are never safe. Like roundabouts, Thai's do not understand them .
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
49 minutes ago, NickyLouie said:
So what's your excuse ?
He hasn't got one, he never has,
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, Morch said:
or decades? Hamas is not in control of the Gaza Strip that long. And, of course, it's not like all Gazans voted them in.
Hamas was founded in 1987, so 3 and a half decades ago
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:
From your mouth to God's ear...
There is no God.
-
2 minutes ago, Morch said:
For decades? Hamas is not in control of the Gaza Strip that long. And, of course, it's not like all Gazans voted them in.
Hopes are very nice, but aren't a substitute for reality, and the reality is that this operation either drags on, or dies a slow undignified death.
The reality is that Israel will not stop until Hamas is finished. They have pretty much destroyed Gaza as a livable environment, so that is progress.
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:
Anyone under 19 is considered an innocent child even if they are fighting with Hamas.
Anyone carrying a weapon is a legitimate target.
-
14 minutes ago, Morch said:
Achieving it how? Does Hamas surrender? Stop fighting? Release hostages? Accept proposals?
Hopefully, when the military action is over, there will be nobody left in Hamas to surrender. The stupid, deluded population of Gaza, who have succored and supported the terrorists for decades, have now lost everything of any value. I hope that they think that it's been worth it.
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
It means Israel is achieving its Military objective, to destroy Hamas and the people and infrastructure that supports it. So far, its a job well done.
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 2
Police Warn Women Upskirting Now Increasing
in Thailand News
Posted
Up skirting is the most pathetic, juvenile, immature, perversion imaginable.