Wobblybob

10 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

War is a very degrading act, and I think it's safe to say that these kind of offenses have taken place throughout the course of history, and still take place on a regular basis. 

 

Though I am sure many soldiers behave in a noble  and righteous fashion, there are likely many who have no moral compass whatsoever, and simply do as they please. 

 

What about the IDF? Any crimes committed on their side, besides genocide? 

I'll give your post the contempt it deserves!

3 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If Blinken is involved I wouldn't put too much importance on it. IMO he's just a big bag of wind.

I have just phoned Blinken and he says that the feeling is mutual!

2 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

I woke up to a wet and overcast morning but the sun immediately broke through the clouds when I saw this post.

 

Alas, it’s overcast again. ‘‘Twas but a lie. I should have guessed.

You invented lying, no need to guess! 

7 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

debunked by who, you TDS tards on here? are you saying Boris Johnson did not fly out from the Uk and put a stop to the peace talks that were in the pipeline? because google will prove you wrong. 

you basically invented a scenario in you head that falls in line with your Trump bad, Putin bad  hysteria, that never happened, what a whopper!

No Frank you are twisting a scenario to suit your fantasy-prone personality, in other words you are away with the fairies. Ukraine were never going to reward Russia with gifting them the Ukrainian land they have stolen, and the sooner you can come to terms with this the sooner we can all move on, try to live in the reality world like the rest of us. 😕

Just now, transam said:

Just a "Red"....🤗

He brings the same argument to these boards on every thread thinking he'll get a different answer. 🥴

Just now, frank83628 said:

 the talks didn't happen because BoJo flew from the UK and put a stop to it, so no negotiations were done, meaning you invented that whole scenario!

This has been discussed many times and as many times it has been discussed it has been debunked, you either don't know what you're talking about or you are trolling. 

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

so, i don't know what i'm talking about, but then you go and invent a version of something that never happened?
 

lying Russians? humm, now.... wasn't there an agreement back in 97 to not expand nato Eastward?,  who went back on that? lets take a guess. 

other countries are wising up and seeing the US for what it is, they are making firmer ties elsewhere for themselves. good on them

didn't Saudi make huge deals with China rather than the US?

 

 

 

Points to note:- NATO doesn't move, countries join NATO out of necessity to protect themselves from the monster that is Russia. 

Why are you so protective of an authoritarian regime that treats Ukrainians as second class citizens and rapes, kills, tortures, and is in the process of destroying every bit of infrastructure they can bomb, this says so much about your mindset and it's not nice!

17 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

iif it was 'all but dead and buried' then why was everyone running round like headless chickens when trump said he wanted to Pull out?

 

the US interference in the region and the threat of nato missiles on Putins border has created this war, a war which could have ended in April 22, but the US & UK put a stop to it.

Hillary Killton being interviewed a while back said  basically, the war should be drawn out to cripple Russias economy! 

 

imaning how the US would react it Putin suddenly  was Putting missiles into Venezuela?.. wait, didnt something similar happen back in 1962?!

Hypocrisy . com 

 

Because the US was pumping the lions share of wonga into the NATO kitty.

Again you don't have a clue what you're talking about, could have been stopped in April 22, of course it could if Ukraine had agreed to surrender the territory that the Russians had already stolen, and then the lying Russians would have returned at a later date to take the rest of Ukraine.

Keep pumping Putin propaganda, it's all you understand!

1 hour ago, Bkk Brian said:

You shouldn't be so dishonest, you have still not provided a link for this claim.

 

"Ukrainian losses are well worth the price !"

 

Just admit you made a mistake and move on.

He has lied and is too dishonest to admit it. 🥴

56 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Bring it on!

What can possibly go wrong.🥴

26 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

Totally clueless. 
 

NATO’s new Asia-Pacific mission is remarkable for several reasons. When the alliance was formed in 1949 amid the looming post-war threat posed by the Soviet Union, it had a clear-cut purpose: protect Western Europe from the threat of Soviet expansionism. Once the Soviet Union collapsed in December 1991, NATO lost its raison d’être. Expanding to Central and Eastern Europe was no longer an obstacle, and the alliance has nearly doubled in size from its Cold War peak. With its geopolitical adversary dead and buried, NATO increasingly looked outside of Europe, in places like Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq, to maintain relevance.

https://time.com/6294499/nato-summit-vilnius-asia/

Yes let's us all thank Putin for the new vigour and interest countries are now showing in NATO, before his illegal invasion of Ukraine NATO was all but dead and buried. Putin has done more to revitalise NATO than any other person, for which we'll be eternally grateful. 

2 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

It seems like English isn’t your first language. Or maybe it’s your comprehension that is the issue.

 

We were (or I was, at any rate) talking about NATO expansion and not why they were expanding.

 

If you still want to hold on to the fallacy that Nato merely considers applications without seeking new members, be my guest. 

Without Russia there wouldn't be NATO, it is not difficult for most to understand!